@Faerlon123, do you find it to be utterly useless to speak the way we do, for of what value is it for US to consider ourselves as 'superior' when we in actuality are doing little but isolating ourselves into social obscurity? Ted Kaszinsky thought much of his own intellect, too. Ah, but then, there is more beneath the surface, no? For let's be honest - we're also a couple of frustrated queers, and THAT shapes our arrogance more than our self perceived intellectual superiority.
Hey, you dolomite snobs, I am a wolf among you geeks, in sheep's clothing. I simply bought a book entitled "Improve Your Vocabulary in 20 Minutes a Day", and I synthesize these odd, arcane panegyrics on these threads--and you fools fall for it. Such a pack of queer shut ins, the gay Fudge Packer Union, the Brotherhood of Brown Dirt Cowboys you all are on these threads.
@Elmore3141 -- Balderdash! It is just that kind of analysis which convinces me that they have begun to put lead in the drinking water in addition to flouride. Your reasoning is comparable to a brain damaged Down Syndrome mongoloid defective child, or perhaps a resident of California. Boy, this is MY thread, and you failed to ask MY permission and puke your emesis on MY turf. I am God; I am smarter than any of you insolent puer. Visit my channels and see how obsessed I am with this stuff.
@ShereKhan77, you obviously have been medicated before coming here and spewing such dribble. I am the gatekeeper of this thread, and it is impostors like you who try to imitate my intellectual prowess. Ha, but such teenage chaff like yourself are but cheap one-offs of the Maestro. Nonetheless, would you like to get together for a backrub (wink wink)? Who are we fooling -- these videos are for gay misfits like us. Let's keep it a secret. Want to "check my prostate"?
Ha. Struck a nerve, I see...next time Phil the plumber comes to fix the basement toilet, why not profess your sodomitic attraction for his plumber-butted self? He can let you deepthroat his shitstained plunger, like you always dreamed of, you little queer.
buckley owns tv.i have to look into this man.see what his deal is.he is really into what people do and why.or at least sounds like it....lemme futher witness more footage....lol
What percentage of adult men who watch videos like this one, or Chomsky / Buckley / Vidal videos would you suppose are GAY? Yet here I sit, vehemently denying to some that I am a Captain on the Fudge Packer team. Yes, it is SO likely that heterosexual men are so infatuated with such topics.
Ah, could any of you 'sensitive' men help me come out of the closet?
Or, could we exchange emails with the prospect of meeting for a little 'backrub time'? (wink wink).
Well, g17swb, if posing childishly as someone far beyond your meager intellect causes you anxiety and depression, perhaps you should retire from posting stupidities and settle down in a nice little domestic 'arrangement' with Phil. After all, he is used to excrement; so you are perfect for him.
Ah, depression and anxiety....I retort others with pseudo-intellectual dribble, for I cannot see the forest for the trees. I see the details of but a single star in the sky, but I trip when I walk for I fail to see the stone in front of me. I laughably see my useless, overly focused "mental abilities" as a "good thing", for as a 'social moron' (and frustrated closet gay) I in actuality am less important that Phil the Plumber.
@Brotherrhaan, are you familiar with the writings of Emerson? He often wrote of the virtues of self sufficiency, and he loathed inferiority. Inferior as in YOU. You may also wish to chalk up on the writings of Japanese philosophers who delineated the proper grounds for one to commit suicide. Having read your dribble on this thread, I believe you more than qualify for the ritual of Hara-Kiri. You puer. How dare you pollute my thread, my manifesto, my thing of beauty and intellect.
@tomitstube, you write like an imbicile. What on earth made you believe you had permission to come to MY thread and vomit your written emesis for all to see? You made as much a fool of yourself by writing here without MY permission as you did by typing your childish words, words resembling those of a retarded mongoloid child who by all rights would have been better off having been aborted. You give credence to the argument that abortions should be considered postpartum. You imbicilic puer.
Ponder, to wit: The cognitive dissonance seen in my behavior whereby I regale in labeling others as "gay" yet where I myself am a charter member of the "Putt from the Rough" Golf Club.
Rather farcical, no? Post hoc, ergo propter hoc, for the preterites and supines of this manner of kallends never ceases to amaze. But then I like to take dick up my "poop chute" and go for calming Sunday morning drives down Brown Dirt Road, if you know what I mean. I love you all, gay brothers on this thread.
@tnt88910, another thing that is comical, is your, inappropriate overuse, of commas.
Hey, isn't it FUN to watch videos of worthless intellectuals like chomsky and buckwheat??!! It's like listening to the neurotic, pressured articulation of Woody Allen but without the entertaining humor!!!
I'm going to start a video playlist of the messages put forth by ANOTHER psycho with a uselessly high IQ, Unabomber Ted Kosinski!! You gay clowns should, too! (maybe you already have--would you share your
Chomsky's book was well written, and his attempt to make those points contained within the book during the interview,, was thwarted by Buckley who was a pawn of that power elite.
simply put what chomsky was getting at was the "good german" syndrome of world war 2. millions knew what was happening to their jewish neighbors but willfully looked the other way.
"You weirdo pseudo-intellectuals! God damn, I'll bet you have NO real life friends, and that you wrongly think you're superior to most other people because of some WORTHLESS academic 'skills' you think you possess. I'll bet you dress terribly, you stink from your incompletely wiped asses, your dentures are covered with yeast, and your semi-bald scalps are covered with huge dandruff flakes! Yecch! You LOSERS!
Nobody cares about you! Go kill yourselves, NOW!!"
Here, I'll pretend to be one of you gay, loner, shut-in, worthless intellectuals, too:
Ergo, to wit, ponder the hypothesis, "Did cavemen laugh when they farted?" Ceteris paribus, one supposes that it would depend on the content of their last meal. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Shame, I haven't gotten laid in 25 years, walking around spewing phrases such as, "et cetera" and "@mcmchugh99".
You pathetic, adults-in-diapers loner shut-in near-dead corpses.
DA TWELVE GUAGE AUTOLODER... That's Italian--you can go pump or auto.
DA FORTY FIVE LONGSLIDE WIT LASER SIGHTING... These are brand new--we just got them in. That's a good gun. Just touch the trigger, the beam comes on and you put the red dot where you want the bullet to go. You can't miss. ...... Anything else?
PHASED PLASMA RIFLE IN DA FORTY WATT RANGE... Hey, just whatcha see, pal...
DA OOZIE NINE MILLIE MEETA... You know your weapons, buddy......So, uh, which'll it be?
You weirdo pseudo-intellectuals! God damn, I'll bet you have NO real life friends, and that you wrongly think you're superior to most other people because of some WORTHLESS academic 'skills' you think you possess. I'll bet you dress terribly, you stink from your incompletely wiped asses, your dentures are covered with yeast, and your semi-bald scalps are covered with huge dandruff flakes! Yecch! You LOSERS!
@Catonian1 I am hardly illiterate, but am a very careless speller and typist. I stand by my assertion that Buckley is an effete thug, and a boor. That was his signature style and practically his stock in trade, the best he had to offer. Some lionize him for it. I despise him for it.
Buckley's body language is interesting. He tries to keep his head as far from Mr. C as much as possible. Buckley is almost falling of hid seat at one point.
I think the libertarian approach is more logical, each individual is accountable for their own actions, if you contribute to those actions than yes you're also responsible for what you've done.
What a pretentious goon .. Noam exposes him as the intellectual light weight that he actually is. Sorry bud but your intelligent sounding accent doesn't hide your inferior processesing capabilities!
1 Billion humans are permanently, severely undernourished. So long humans, workers, employees can not commonly own and control over what happens with their surplus production and their generated profits, 3 Billion humans that earn less than $2 a day will keep on being extorted by capitalism.
Democratize the economy, Workers Control over Production!☭
If you are against communism you have no clue what it is.
except that in practice he certainly is a liberal; when he supported obama's candidacy, for example. he could have suppported something/someone else, but he said that obama was the only option "if you live in he real world", or words to that effect. although i greatly admire the work chomsky has done, today he is far shorter on solutions than your average participant in any current "occupy" event.
Buckley's punch reference is in jest referring to the Vidal thing.. actually his guest were always treated very well and were given time to articulate their points of view.
Chomsky is dead on the money with his assessment of how the world works. Not all Germans were NAZIs and I'm sure many of them secretly knew Hitler was insane, much in the same way many Americans realized G W Bush was an imbecile. When you frighten enough people with the boogieman, rationality can go out the window, as was evidenced with 9/11. The ONLY rational voice in Congress was Barbara Lee. She was the only one who could see the forest for the trees and voted against the Iraq war.
HERE'S THE TRUTH: 1. Vietnam was a waste. 2. Buckley was no great hero but a man more intrested in being a socialite than helping America. He unlike say Pat Buchanan ignored the big issues in his last decades as he fizzled intellectually (immigration, demography, affirmative action, etc.). He went soft on mlk and the platitudes of his last decade were pathetic he had been conquered by PC. He tried to destroy Buchanan in 92'.
Buckley's not really threatening to punch Chomsky; this discussion occurred a year after Buckley actually DID threaten to punch Gore Vidal in the face. Here he is simply alluding to that comment playfully. Chomsky's reaction makes it clear that he catches the allusion.
Give William F. Buckley credit for at least interviewing his political opponents and arguing with them. There are a lot of conservative pundits today who couldn't handle that kind of discussion at all.
im on CHOMPSKYS SIDE ON EVERYTHING.dont hate w,f buck,just think he was brainwashed,ignorant,,i believe he regretted some of his positions near the end.did anyone else read he thought IRAQ was a bad idea and that pres ford thought dick chaney was nuts???
It seems that no matter what language they speak or in what part of the world we observe them, liberals tend to miss the point with the same, inimitable tone of confidence.
@jgolowka My point... was about the liberals that missed the point of the exchange between Buckley and Chomsky. It's all right there, and one need only stick to objective observation to know that both men were being ironic.
Just now I caught myself about to explain, but I decided just to enjoy the irony of you missing my point and corroborating it too.
@jgolowka It's because you and other libs in this comment thread have no clue what you're trying to comment on, that it is NOT obvious to you that you miss Buckley's point and my comment about the way libs go about missing points in general. Look, I'm more than happy to let you continue to entertain me, but really, why don't you just go educate yourself as to what Mr. Buckley was referencing in that clip instead of working your foot still deeper into your mouth?
William F. Buckley represents a realist of the American Empire ie..It has to do the very things it needs to do to not only survive but also to stamp its mark (just as other Empires have done past present AND future). Whereas Noam Chomsky represents the romantics, those who live in the luxury of an Empire but do not wish to take on board the very things IT has to do to survive as well as to provide the safeguard on those people that manifested the Empire in the first place. That's life MAN.
Ha Ha. You morons missed the 'allusion" Buckley was making. Buckley was spoofing himself when he did threaten to "smash" gore Vidal "in the face" on ABC t.v. in the late 60's.
If you truly were knowledgable, you would have known this and would have gotten the clever allusion to that incident -- So, Buckely is making a funny to Chomsky, who definitely is amused by it.
You people are so stupid it's frightening -- maybe Ignorant is a better word. You just don't know anything.
Dude. It's impossible to know everything, OK. Forgive us for having missed a minute of the '60s. BTW, I don't know who has the definition of "truly knowledgable" but I know it's not you.
In this particular clip Buckley is actually making fun of himself. It was in an earlier debate with Gore Vidal (easily found on youtube) where he "lost his temper" and said and I quote: "now listen you queer, stop calling me a crypto-Nazi or I'll knock you in the goddamn face" --and meant it.
Noam makes an excellent point here. I think for example the viewers and makers of The Daily Show may be especially guilty of this charge, as they enjoy some polite and sophisticated catharsis, without really getting passionate and changing anything, as the world burns.
@FrogmortonHotchkiss I think hes referring more to the "average American". We hide ourselves in the suburbs, we all partake in the purchase of an automobile with no alternative transport, we all work for a corporation because it is the only option, and we are all totally apathetic to what it is doing to our society. Nobody will stand out and challenge it because we are afraid that our whole life runs on this system and if we stand out we will be branded a "hippie" enemy of the American dream.
@TheGoodChap Hmm, I think Daily Show viewers don't depart from the average so much. On average, anyway. :-)
I mean, they were 100% behind Obama, even while Noam was warning that he was an opportunist without political substance. I mean, "yes we can" - come on... [cringe]
if buckley wants to punch someone, be sure he puts his thumb on the outside not the inside. what I love about all the highly visible republicans is how many criticise protesting the vietnam war but all the same republicans neatly got themselves out of military service: new gingrich, rush limbaugh, haley barbour, george f. will, karl rove, dick cheney (who had the gall to say, "I had other priorities than military service in the sixties). so did my two football coaches who were both killed then.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
I think I'm more in between Buckley and Chompsky. I do agree that being detached or apathic atrocities that goes on in this world is dangerous. But on the other hand if I do agree that if everyone is guility of everything then no one is guility. I wouldn't say that everyone is guility, but we can't expect our indifference will create a better world.
William F. Buckley, was severely deluded, imbued with prig and sprig grandiloquence, which compounded the echo-chamber impact of his dithering verbosity; notable are his a) nearly arch eye movements, b) flamboyant torso posturing, c) haughty ruse of an accent, akin in its inane superciliousness to that voiced by miss-informed Grace Kelly; both clearly unwitting fashion victims of an era touting WASP arriviste glare, d) while Grace had beauty and charm, e) Alcohol-Bill proved bore & closet-case
@Seedofwinter Chumpsky didn't "whip on him" he talked around everything Buckley brought up, not actually debating the points and topics but doing the chumpsky thing. He's a good debater because he (in his socialist hypocrite style) does his best to derail the debate down to his own moral level.
@daPlumber702 William Buckley didn't even have a grip on history in this debate, Chompsky actually had to remedy his glib knowledge.
Which point do you speak of? Chompsky calls a spade a spade: Country's do what's in their interests, and us Americans wrought destruction with the Soviets
With all due respect to Buckley and his family, Buckley is a pristine example of someone educated beyond their intelligence.He is a master of English, that uses it's flowery words to cloak his ignorance
Buckley comes off much better here. Chomsky's irresponsibly vague ideological definitions create meaningless moral criterion that makes the conversation impossible. Buckley just keeps making concessions to Chomsky to the point that they can't go anywhere.
@Onieracraft No "ideological definitions" were made; the crux of Chomsky's point was that a populace's excessive ideological/behavioral tolerance and timid unwillingness to intervene are as responsible for the eventual ascension of extremism as the inherent philosophical volition necessary for an extremist's success. Buckley tried to construe the issue as a 'theological observation' ("Guilty of everything, guilty of nothing.") when no proposition had been sought.
@Anonymous61771520 He says people should be less tolerant of bad decision making by their leaders. He finds the public's patience or open-mindedness terrifying. But should we be less tolerant of Democrats, or less tolerant of Republicans? We're back where we started, trying to determine who's right. All I can conclude is that Chomsky wants less quiet discussion and more loud arguing. Even better: less loud arguing and more violent revolution. But, somehow, always in the correct direction.
I think guys like Buckley get upset since they can't just say the truth. We want a war to profit from. Period. So do that and just straight up say what you want. Profit from the war. I think I respect black racist and neo-nazi's more since they at least up front tell you want they want. If I personally invaded Afganistan with a stated goal of destroying the Taliban I would have invaded Pakistan or at least told them I am entering your nation to destroy your Taliban and treated them as a frenemy
Nick Jonah fucked Justin Bieber in the poop chute, and then he spritzed Tabasco sauce on Bieber's dick. Then Screech from Saved By The Bell showed up and rubbed Vaseline on everyone's dick and hung Christmas tree ornaments from their testicles. Next, Screech inserted a cooked bratwurst into Nick's asshole, I mean WAY in there, then he pulled it out AND ATE IT.
Chomsky was walking his poodle through the woods when he felt the urge to pee. He looked for a deserving tree and when he chose one and approached it, he was surprised to find Burl Ives sitting at the base of the tree reading the Gita. Chomsky unholstered his dick and Burl Ives grabbed it and yanked on it with over 330 Newton-metres of force. It broke. Then then Michael Moore walked up and buttfucked both of them.
Chomsky is regarded as one of the world's leading intellectuals, and I respect that. However, I really don't see how anyone can read what he has said and written about the Israeli-palestinian conflict and have any respect for his opinion on this subject. His viewson this complex issue are stunningly simplistic, based more on emotion than logic, and would be disastrous in the extreme if actually implemented.
@oldstock1607 I agree. He's a prominent thinker on many levels and in many different fields. But when talking about politics, he never really says anything substantial or backs anything up with evidence, but is good at making seemingly agreeable disputes.
@m0ssadic And yet so many people overlook this with him. I think it's probably because he is such a demi-god to leftists throughout the world that they are prepared to take literally ANYTHING he says on any given matter as gospel. And as this is such a polarized issue, Chomsky and his devotees are willing to champion what feels good to them personally and aligns with their leftist sensibilities over that which is actually practical or just.
@Sagefrakrobatik He advocates a two-state solution, believing that this is going to stop the violence. This stance is flawed on two very fundamental principles: 1. It ignores the fact that anti-semitism (as in anti-judaism) is a fundamental tenet of Islam. Thus, the issue is not (form the Arab perspective) about territory at all. Even if a two state solution is implemented, the violence will continue, unabated, guaranteed. Islam is so heavily predicated on jew-hatred that even muslims who have
@oldstock1607 never had contact with Jews, for example, Pakistanis, hate jews. No Arab, no muslim state is EVER going to accept the presence of Jews on (what they see as) Arab land, and land sacred to islam. The Israelis offered the Palestinians a state long ago and the Palestinians flatly refused it. 2. It is based upon the belief that the U.S. can leverage the Israelis into ceding captured territory for this purpose. The Israeli lobby is so powerful in the U.S. that the Israelis dictate U.S.
@oldstock1607 never had contact with Jews, for example, Pakistanis, hate jews. No Arab, no muslim state is EVER going to accept the presence of Jews on (what they see as) Arab land, and land sacred to islam. The Israelis offered the Palestinians a state long ago and the Palestinians flatly refused it. 2. It is based upon the belief that the U.S. can leverage the Israelis into ceding captured territory for this purpose. The Israeli lobby is so powerful in the U.S. that the Israelis dictate U.S.
@oldstock1607 foreign policy to U.S. politicians, not the other way around. It is folly, not to mention supremely arrogant to think that this 1400 year-old conflict can be solved so simplistically. Now watch as people crawl out of the woodwork to try and counter what I've said about Jew-hatred in Islam. Also, Chomsky has called the Israelis "human rights violators," as if the Palestinian, if given their own state, would respect human rights. Who believes that? They don't respect human rights NOW
@oldstock1607 Dude your so full of it wow. Bet you didnt know the Mufti of Italy said publicly that the Jews have a historic right to Israel. Ever hear of a Musilm organization known as Arabs for Israel. They use the Quran to support their argument for Israel.
@Sagefrakrobatik By citing some obscure Mufti from the catholic nation of ITALY? Give me a break. Do you really wanna go there? Because if you do, I'll probably embarrass you. I have the Hadith, the Qur'an, multiple statements from Shar'ia law jurisprudence, and a multitude of statements from Imams around the world to prove my statement. And here's a tip, young man--when you hear muslims make the statement "we don't hate Jews, only zionists" take it at face value because it is definitely a LIE.
William Frawley played Fred Mertz on I Love Lucy. Frawley FUCKED Chomsky in his rectum while simultaneously grabbing Woody Allen's woody, and wrapping his mouth around Barney's Frank. Frawley then had his own rectum violated by Anthony's Weiner.
Fred Gwynne later arrived and sprayed Kouros pour Homme on all of them, and began whistling the opening theme song to the ancient TV show "Taxi" while he completely disrobed, revealing tattoos of Jimmy Carter and Vladimir Lenin on his butt cheeks.
How much we've lost. Not that I ever thought Buckley was an intellectual par excellence but...seriously....compare Buckley to oh say...Andrew Breitbart or whatever wunderkind the so-called conservatives are promoting (with millions in corporate support) today. What happened to my country? Why has the discourse become so bizarre, theatrical, and famously uninformed?
Remember when being educated was something one aspired to? Something one respected in others?
they both work for the government and rich people..its funny to see phoney bolognas pretend they are at odds with each other. Chomsky: i work for MIT the biggest contractor for the government. Buckley: Yes, I work for whoever in the corporate media will pay for my british speaking lessons and my expensive suit. maybe if we punch each other, the audience will REALLY believe we are enemies. Hilarious!
@bullshit3118 Guilt by association is a fallacy. Look it up. Read it. Think about it. You don't think Chomsky knows that MIT is a huge military contractor? There's footage of him appealing to MIT students about this very issue from the Vietnam War era. Why does the fact that he works there mean he's a participant in this activity? Do you know how large MIT is? And your attack against Buckley is 100% ad hominem. Another logical fallacy. Perhaps you should have gone to [a better] college?
@sleepcity how about this you little fucking weasel. you work for the man, you are the man. there are plenty of colleges that could use his services, but he works THERE. im sorry, i just realized your an MIT student. Go play with your little robots. any asshole that likes WILLIAM BUCKLEY..lol....how much more idiotic can you be. You are one A PRIORI piece of shit. hows that for latin asshole? lol
@bullshit3118 Nope, not an MIT student, though I wish I was -- it's a great American educational institution. I attend a state university. Don't you think it's a little simplistic and juvenile to refer to a massive educational institution as "The man?" It sort of makes you sound like a really self-righteous 15 year-old. I don't like Buckley, I merely pointed out how civil he appears compared with contemporary right-wing pundits. And is the name-calling really necessary? Are you really 15?
@sleepcity Who cares about my age you college boy twerp?? I think Chomsky is full of shit. I think Buckley is full of shit. Look what happened to Norman Finkelstein when he speaks out against Israel and his parents were holocuast survivors. he gets kicked out of DePaul by Zionist Derschowtiz. read about it, now he cant teach anywhere. Look at fucking Chomsky still at work and babbling away MUCH MORE than Finkelstein. he is an insider and a co-opter. and again blow it out your ass :)
@bullshit3118 Ah, the name-calling continues. I'm guessing by your bringing up Finkelstein and his not being granted tenure (which by the way appeared to me to be unfair and the result of political influence by his many ideological opponents, but nevermind -- I'm sure you'll ignore that) ultimately portends anti-semitism to be your bag. You hate Chomsky, you hate Buckley, you hate Dershowitz (no "c" big guy), you hate Harvard, you hate MIT, and you hate me. We get it. Anything relevant to say?
@sleepcity UH OH, trying to drag me into the anti-semitism "bag" huh? Seems to me lots of jewish folk pull that trick when they going gets tough. I'm against the abuse of power, I dont fuckin care of you wave your Israeli flag or not. Why would I ignore the fascism of Finkelstein's oponnents you moron? But if you want a good jewish joke, Dershowitz does remind me of hitler. how's that for relevance sleepy?
Well, isn't that special.
TemplarLeonem 16 hours ago
Subject g175wb continues to exhibit projective self- descriptive self-hate. Core mythos: unabomber, homosexuality, anally- fixated.
Prognosis: negative.
Reccomend ECT and psychotropics.
TemplarLeonem 1 day ago
@Faerlon123, do you find it to be utterly useless to speak the way we do, for of what value is it for US to consider ourselves as 'superior' when we in actuality are doing little but isolating ourselves into social obscurity? Ted Kaszinsky thought much of his own intellect, too. Ah, but then, there is more beneath the surface, no? For let's be honest - we're also a couple of frustrated queers, and THAT shapes our arrogance more than our self perceived intellectual superiority.
TempIarLeonem 1 day ago
More infantile-regressive anal-obsessive passive aggressive neurotic-projective textbook homosexual panic from g175wb, posing as (temp'I'arleonem).
Dolomote is a white mineral, you moron. And panegyrics are public speeches of praise, you imbecile.
Yet another errant failure. But one supposes you are used to it...
TemplarLeonem 2 days ago
Hey, you dolomite snobs, I am a wolf among you geeks, in sheep's clothing. I simply bought a book entitled "Improve Your Vocabulary in 20 Minutes a Day", and I synthesize these odd, arcane panegyrics on these threads--and you fools fall for it. Such a pack of queer shut ins, the gay Fudge Packer Union, the Brotherhood of Brown Dirt Cowboys you all are on these threads.
I love you.
Anybody up for a backrub (wink wink)?
TempIarLeonem 2 days ago
@Faerlon123- reverse snobbery is declasse.
TemplarLeonem 3 days ago
SERIOUSLY cringe when I hear upper class bourgeoise people speak English like Buckley. Blargh.
Faerlon123 3 days ago
Wouldn't any of us?
kidpresentable 3 days ago
Apparently Phil rejected your offer of man love, g175wb- you seem in quite a snit.
TemplarLeonem 3 days ago
Poor g17swb...perpetually stuck on stupid.
A shovelful of ashes, a bucket of filth, a disgrace to his race.
TemplarLeonem 6 days ago
@Elmore3141 -- Balderdash! It is just that kind of analysis which convinces me that they have begun to put lead in the drinking water in addition to flouride. Your reasoning is comparable to a brain damaged Down Syndrome mongoloid defective child, or perhaps a resident of California. Boy, this is MY thread, and you failed to ask MY permission and puke your emesis on MY turf. I am God; I am smarter than any of you insolent puer. Visit my channels and see how obsessed I am with this stuff.
TempIarLeonem 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ShereKhan77, you obviously have been medicated before coming here and spewing such dribble. I am the gatekeeper of this thread, and it is impostors like you who try to imitate my intellectual prowess. Ha, but such teenage chaff like yourself are but cheap one-offs of the Maestro. Nonetheless, would you like to get together for a backrub (wink wink)? Who are we fooling -- these videos are for gay misfits like us. Let's keep it a secret. Want to "check my prostate"?
TempIarLeonem 6 days ago
Comment removed
TempIarLeonem 6 days ago
Ha. Struck a nerve, I see...next time Phil the plumber comes to fix the basement toilet, why not profess your sodomitic attraction for his plumber-butted self? He can let you deepthroat his shitstained plunger, like you always dreamed of, you little queer.
Go back to g17swb, your original fag-tag.
TemplarLeonem 1 week ago
buckley owns tv.i have to look into this man.see what his deal is.he is really into what people do and why.or at least sounds like it....lemme futher witness more footage....lol
ShereKhan77 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What percentage of adult men who watch videos like this one, or Chomsky / Buckley / Vidal videos would you suppose are GAY? Yet here I sit, vehemently denying to some that I am a Captain on the Fudge Packer team. Yes, it is SO likely that heterosexual men are so infatuated with such topics.
Ah, could any of you 'sensitive' men help me come out of the closet?
Or, could we exchange emails with the prospect of meeting for a little 'backrub time'? (wink wink).
TempIarLeonem 1 week ago
Well, g17swb, if posing childishly as someone far beyond your meager intellect causes you anxiety and depression, perhaps you should retire from posting stupidities and settle down in a nice little domestic 'arrangement' with Phil. After all, he is used to excrement; so you are perfect for him.
TemplarLeonem 1 week ago
Ah, depression and anxiety....I retort others with pseudo-intellectual dribble, for I cannot see the forest for the trees. I see the details of but a single star in the sky, but I trip when I walk for I fail to see the stone in front of me. I laughably see my useless, overly focused "mental abilities" as a "good thing", for as a 'social moron' (and frustrated closet gay) I in actuality am less important that Phil the Plumber.
Puerrrrrrr.....
TempIarLeonem 1 week ago
The imbecile referring to Japanese philosophers and 'hara-kiri' should read a book once.
The term for the epistem is Bushido. And the Samurai, who practiced this, NEVER used the vulgar 'belly-cutting' term. It is called Seppuku.
My Iado instructor would lay you out if you talked so disrespectfully in his presence.
TemplarLeonem 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Still impostor, still stupid and vile.
I invite all users to report this idiot.
TemplarLeonem 1 week ago
@Brotherrhaan, are you familiar with the writings of Emerson? He often wrote of the virtues of self sufficiency, and he loathed inferiority. Inferior as in YOU. You may also wish to chalk up on the writings of Japanese philosophers who delineated the proper grounds for one to commit suicide. Having read your dribble on this thread, I believe you more than qualify for the ritual of Hara-Kiri. You puer. How dare you pollute my thread, my manifesto, my thing of beauty and intellect.
TempIarLeonem 1 week ago
@tomitstube, you write like an imbicile. What on earth made you believe you had permission to come to MY thread and vomit your written emesis for all to see? You made as much a fool of yourself by writing here without MY permission as you did by typing your childish words, words resembling those of a retarded mongoloid child who by all rights would have been better off having been aborted. You give credence to the argument that abortions should be considered postpartum. You imbicilic puer.
TempIarLeonem 1 week ago
To all witnessing: 'TempIarLeonem' is an impostor. Note substitution of 'I' for 'l".
What passes for clever in the short-bus set.
As to all that homoerotic fixation-all I can say is go get laid, nancy. You are really obsessed, just get it over with.
TemplarLeonem 1 week ago
Ponder, to wit: The cognitive dissonance seen in my behavior whereby I regale in labeling others as "gay" yet where I myself am a charter member of the "Putt from the Rough" Golf Club.
Rather farcical, no? Post hoc, ergo propter hoc, for the preterites and supines of this manner of kallends never ceases to amaze. But then I like to take dick up my "poop chute" and go for calming Sunday morning drives down Brown Dirt Road, if you know what I mean. I love you all, gay brothers on this thread.
TempIarLeonem 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LokiTetch, @blackmichael75, @HurricaneTBag, @g17y5wb, @PublicSecrecy, @maidenman69, @JimBowie1133, @mattb521, @CathProdigalDaughter, @DemCatBo, @fLcGambit, @economist737 -- Chomsky's modus operandi has always been the same. You have to read the Anti-Chomsky Reader by Horowitz, et al. He counters arguments with "facts", not logic. The only problem is, you inutile sodomites, facsimiles of supercilious English toff, your penises leak the drivel of gonorrhea into your boyfriends' mouths.
TempIarLeonem 2 weeks ago
@gay5ob,
Why don't you regale us with some of your scatological reminisce thinly disguised as lampoon?
TemplarLeonem 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hot fucking cocksucking two timing bitch,
Mama's in the kitchen cooking red hot shit,
Father's in hell,
and brother's in jail.
Sister's on the corner yelling, "Pussy for sale!"
Thank you.
gj7l1O0ij49gq1l00O0l 2 weeks ago
@tnt88910, another thing that is comical, is your, inappropriate overuse, of commas.
Hey, isn't it FUN to watch videos of worthless intellectuals like chomsky and buckwheat??!! It's like listening to the neurotic, pressured articulation of Woody Allen but without the entertaining humor!!!
I'm going to start a video playlist of the messages put forth by ANOTHER psycho with a uselessly high IQ, Unabomber Ted Kosinski!! You gay clowns should, too! (maybe you already have--would you share your
g17y5wb 2 weeks ago
I want to be, just like William F. Buckley, I mean, for comical reasons
tnt88910 3 weeks ago
Chomsky's book was well written, and his attempt to make those points contained within the book during the interview,, was thwarted by Buckley who was a pawn of that power elite.
Brotherrhaan 3 weeks ago
simply put what chomsky was getting at was the "good german" syndrome of world war 2. millions knew what was happening to their jewish neighbors but willfully looked the other way.
tomitstube 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"You weirdo pseudo-intellectuals! God damn, I'll bet you have NO real life friends, and that you wrongly think you're superior to most other people because of some WORTHLESS academic 'skills' you think you possess. I'll bet you dress terribly, you stink from your incompletely wiped asses, your dentures are covered with yeast, and your semi-bald scalps are covered with huge dandruff flakes! Yecch! You LOSERS!
Nobody cares about you! Go kill yourselves, NOW!!"
Well put.
gj7l1O0ij49gq1l00O0l 1 month ago
@mcmchugh99
fuck and piss
shit and tits
cunt and damn
whore and anus
bitch and cock
It's a word game -- can you figure it out?
PS - fuck you.
gj7l1O0ij49gq1l00O0l 1 month ago
Here, I'll pretend to be one of you gay, loner, shut-in, worthless intellectuals, too:
Ergo, to wit, ponder the hypothesis, "Did cavemen laugh when they farted?" Ceteris paribus, one supposes that it would depend on the content of their last meal. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Shame, I haven't gotten laid in 25 years, walking around spewing phrases such as, "et cetera" and "@mcmchugh99".
You pathetic, adults-in-diapers loner shut-in near-dead corpses.
gj7l1O0ij49gq1l00O0l 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DA TWELVE GUAGE AUTOLODER... That's Italian--you can go pump or auto.
DA FORTY FIVE LONGSLIDE WIT LASER SIGHTING... These are brand new--we just got them in. That's a good gun. Just touch the trigger, the beam comes on and you put the red dot where you want the bullet to go. You can't miss. ...... Anything else?
PHASED PLASMA RIFLE IN DA FORTY WATT RANGE... Hey, just whatcha see, pal...
DA OOZIE NINE MILLIE MEETA... You know your weapons, buddy......So, uh, which'll it be?
ALL...
gj7l1O0ij49gq1l00O0l 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I may close early today...There's a 15 day wait on the handguns but the rifles you can take right now.
You can't do dat...
WRONG
gj7l1O0ij49gq1l00O0l 1 month ago
You weirdo pseudo-intellectuals! God damn, I'll bet you have NO real life friends, and that you wrongly think you're superior to most other people because of some WORTHLESS academic 'skills' you think you possess. I'll bet you dress terribly, you stink from your incompletely wiped asses, your dentures are covered with yeast, and your semi-bald scalps are covered with huge dandruff flakes! Yecch! You LOSERS!
Nobody cares about you! Go kill yourselves, NOW!!
Masturbate to pics at my channe
g17y5wb 1 month ago
Buckley's the only man who could ever threaten to punch you in the face and sound absolutely adorable while saying it!
icarus313 1 month ago 5
@icarus313 that cause he's a neatly-parted hair pink panty homosexual.
MetrazolElectricity 19 hours ago
Bukley is an efete thug and boor.
tonygumbrell22 1 month ago
@tonygumbrell22 And you're an illiterate who can't spell.
Catonian1 1 month ago
@Catonian1 I am hardly illiterate, but am a very careless speller and typist. I stand by my assertion that Buckley is an effete thug, and a boor. That was his signature style and practically his stock in trade, the best he had to offer. Some lionize him for it. I despise him for it.
tonygumbrell22 1 month ago
@tonygumbrell22 Noted. The universe is indifferent.
Catonian1 1 month ago
Buckley's body language is interesting. He tries to keep his head as far from Mr. C as much as possible. Buckley is almost falling of hid seat at one point.
marmite400 1 month ago
If Chomsky had lost his temper, he'd have slapped Buckley's face and then wetted himself while crying like a baby.
Elmore3141 1 month ago
I kind of like William Buckley; he's arguably the closest thing to an intellectual the conservatives have ever produced.
1960mayhem 1 month ago
at no time did buckley threaten to punch chomsky.
he threatened the smash chomsky.
and no threat was made to chomsky's face.
rather, the threat in question was made to chomsky's goddam face.
itwontbelongyaya 2 months ago
@itwontbelongyaya - Chomsky dIdn't flinch- he wasn't intimidated in the least - people make too much of this muttered threat.
moffat691 1 month ago
No matter which 'side' one may support I feel it is wonderful to hear articulate and intelligent discussion from both of these men.
tiranuir 2 months ago
Actually to be accurate Chomsky is an Asshole.
bnsaints 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bnsaints On the contrary. If there is any hope for preventing the US from going feral, it's Chomsky.
TheCentralServices 2 months ago
RONPAUL2012 . COM !
FOR LIBERTY!
FOR PEACE!
N8Revolution 2 months ago
@N8Revolution Ron Paul: Racists for Unilateral Surrender.
DonMeaker 1 month ago
I think the libertarian approach is more logical, each individual is accountable for their own actions, if you contribute to those actions than yes you're also responsible for what you've done.
N8Revolution 2 months ago
@N8Revolution so logical in fact that Somalia has given it a go and hasn't that turned out well
irishgodfatherchris 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a pretentious goon .. Noam exposes him as the intellectual light weight that he actually is. Sorry bud but your intelligent sounding accent doesn't hide your inferior processesing capabilities!
N8Revolution 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1 Billion humans are permanently, severely undernourished. So long humans, workers, employees can not commonly own and control over what happens with their surplus production and their generated profits, 3 Billion humans that earn less than $2 a day will keep on being extorted by capitalism.
Democratize the economy, Workers Control over Production!☭
If you are against communism you have no clue what it is.
marxists. org
noprofitmaximierung 2 months ago
Buckley was an arrogant piece of shit who had absolutely nothing to offer. He needed to have his buck teeth mashed in
akeffo 2 months ago
@akeffo " Oh OK.....thank you for that.....Next on the line is Mike, Mike, go ahead...."
Shenandoah58 2 months ago
except that in practice he certainly is a liberal; when he supported obama's candidacy, for example. he could have suppported something/someone else, but he said that obama was the only option "if you live in he real world", or words to that effect. although i greatly admire the work chomsky has done, today he is far shorter on solutions than your average participant in any current "occupy" event.
lipsbach 2 months ago
Buckley's punch reference is in jest referring to the Vidal thing.. actually his guest were always treated very well and were given time to articulate their points of view.
TurboVonCrim 3 months ago
Chomsky is dead on the money with his assessment of how the world works. Not all Germans were NAZIs and I'm sure many of them secretly knew Hitler was insane, much in the same way many Americans realized G W Bush was an imbecile. When you frighten enough people with the boogieman, rationality can go out the window, as was evidenced with 9/11. The ONLY rational voice in Congress was Barbara Lee. She was the only one who could see the forest for the trees and voted against the Iraq war.
OaktownUSA 3 months ago
Can't stand Buckley. He postures and tries to act British..and fails. Why does he always sit sideways? Twit.
ib422000 3 months ago
HERE'S THE TRUTH: 1. Vietnam was a waste. 2. Buckley was no great hero but a man more intrested in being a socialite than helping America. He unlike say Pat Buchanan ignored the big issues in his last decades as he fizzled intellectually (immigration, demography, affirmative action, etc.). He went soft on mlk and the platitudes of his last decade were pathetic he had been conquered by PC. He tried to destroy Buchanan in 92'.
knightschwartz 3 months ago
@knightschwartz So basically you're telling us that you're a racist?
Onieracraft 3 months ago
@Onieracraft so you've been so brainwashed that you think caring about mass immigration makes one racist? You've been brainwashed very well.
knightschwartz 2 months ago
@knightschwartz
I didn't say that caring about mass immigration was racism, I suggested that YOU are a racist.
Onieracraft 2 months ago
This video is titled wrong, he does not threaten to punch Noam Chomsky in the face, he is simply joking with him. Don't try and stir trouble.
Australiano75 3 months ago
Did this pansy buckley ever have so much as a fist fight.......with another man that is?
mrearlygold 3 months ago
Did Chomsky ever come out of the closet?? My GayDar is pinging off the charts right now. His wrists are so loose..
M3di3v4L 3 months ago
That was not a threat, it was a joke about his steamrolling Gore Vidal.
davebex13 3 months ago
@ElginSteamer you're an ignorant motherfucker. that is all.
daPlumber702 3 months ago
Buckley never had a more formidable opponent.
ShaneKarma376 3 months ago
Buckley's not really threatening to punch Chomsky; this discussion occurred a year after Buckley actually DID threaten to punch Gore Vidal in the face. Here he is simply alluding to that comment playfully. Chomsky's reaction makes it clear that he catches the allusion.
ilikebook22 3 months ago 61
Give William F. Buckley credit for at least interviewing his political opponents and arguing with them. There are a lot of conservative pundits today who couldn't handle that kind of discussion at all.
mcmchugh99 3 months ago 12
@mcmchugh99
Agreed. My politics are the total opposite of Buckley's but I do miss Firing Line. It's a shame we don't do shows like this anymore.
Rushlimpballs 1 month ago
How do you feel now Buckley or have you still got the brains of a rocking horse!
TheGMMuk 3 months ago
Saying "god damn" on syndicated tv! Those were the days!
NoRegretsForOurYouth 3 months ago
I think he was joking...
tboladave 3 months ago
im on CHOMPSKYS SIDE ON EVERYTHING.dont hate w,f buck,just think he was brainwashed,ignorant,,i believe he regretted some of his positions near the end.did anyone else read he thought IRAQ was a bad idea and that pres ford thought dick chaney was nuts???
diagreen 4 months ago
Once upon a time.PBS granted air time to Mr.Buckley----It's so hard to fathom considering thier present tilt.
Pomiferous 4 months ago
Wow, didn't know Buckley was such a dick.
lurconis666 4 months ago
It seems that no matter what language they speak or in what part of the world we observe them, liberals tend to miss the point with the same, inimitable tone of confidence.
Contontos 4 months ago
@Contontos Chomsky is not a liberal. He is an anarcho-syndicalist. There are more than 2 philosophies in the world.
jgolowka 4 months ago 34
@jgolowka My point... was about the liberals that missed the point of the exchange between Buckley and Chomsky. It's all right there, and one need only stick to objective observation to know that both men were being ironic.
Just now I caught myself about to explain, but I decided just to enjoy the irony of you missing my point and corroborating it too.
Contontos 3 months ago
@Contontos I don't think you explained your point very well, or fully grasped my point.
jgolowka 3 months ago
@jgolowka It's because you and other libs in this comment thread have no clue what you're trying to comment on, that it is NOT obvious to you that you miss Buckley's point and my comment about the way libs go about missing points in general. Look, I'm more than happy to let you continue to entertain me, but really, why don't you just go educate yourself as to what Mr. Buckley was referencing in that clip instead of working your foot still deeper into your mouth?
Contontos 3 months ago
@jgolowka lol
Wrong. There's the Republican party and the Democratic party. Both sides...
sk8tafrnk 1 month ago
Am I missing something? Where did he threaten to punch Chomsky in the face?
sauceykat 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
William F. Buckley represents a realist of the American Empire ie..It has to do the very things it needs to do to not only survive but also to stamp its mark (just as other Empires have done past present AND future). Whereas Noam Chomsky represents the romantics, those who live in the luxury of an Empire but do not wish to take on board the very things IT has to do to survive as well as to provide the safeguard on those people that manifested the Empire in the first place. That's life MAN.
bloodcell9 4 months ago
I always want to punch Buckley out when he opens his mouth.
dirkstorm 4 months ago
affectation
contacter 4 months ago
What was up with that weird accent buckley had---sort of tweedy, anyone for tennis? blueblood wannabe affection? What an asshole.
contacter 4 months ago
Ha Ha. You morons missed the 'allusion" Buckley was making. Buckley was spoofing himself when he did threaten to "smash" gore Vidal "in the face" on ABC t.v. in the late 60's.
If you truly were knowledgable, you would have known this and would have gotten the clever allusion to that incident -- So, Buckely is making a funny to Chomsky, who definitely is amused by it.
You people are so stupid it's frightening -- maybe Ignorant is a better word. You just don't know anything.
salutetheflag 4 months ago 2
@salutetheflag
Dude. It's impossible to know everything, OK. Forgive us for having missed a minute of the '60s. BTW, I don't know who has the definition of "truly knowledgable" but I know it's not you.
basaintl 4 months ago
@66ott7 you mean a closet homosexual who did a lot of cocaine. that whole Yale thing? haha
pjh2331 4 months ago
I think Buckley was part of that whole "Yale" thing.
66ott7 4 months ago
@66ott7 Haha good one Patrick
destroyerofsenses 4 months ago
he's referencing a video where gore vidal accused him of being a crypto-nazi.
businessgoop 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In this particular clip Buckley is actually making fun of himself. It was in an earlier debate with Gore Vidal (easily found on youtube) where he "lost his temper" and said and I quote: "now listen you queer, stop calling me a crypto-Nazi or I'll knock you in the goddamn face" --and meant it.
joviste 4 months ago
Comment removed
joviste 4 months ago
Why does everyone assume when an "Interview" is held that its a debate
logicCplusplus 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chump ski is so mercifully free of the ravages of intelligence and wisdom, (correction)
JZarter 4 months ago
Chump ski is so mercifully free of the ravages on intelligence and wisdom.
JZarter 4 months ago
noam chomsky equates lemay with hitler.....you really dont need to hear much more than that to figure out where this asshole is coming from
rmendel100 4 months ago
Noam makes an excellent point here. I think for example the viewers and makers of The Daily Show may be especially guilty of this charge, as they enjoy some polite and sophisticated catharsis, without really getting passionate and changing anything, as the world burns.
FrogmortonHotchkiss 4 months ago
@FrogmortonHotchkiss I think hes referring more to the "average American". We hide ourselves in the suburbs, we all partake in the purchase of an automobile with no alternative transport, we all work for a corporation because it is the only option, and we are all totally apathetic to what it is doing to our society. Nobody will stand out and challenge it because we are afraid that our whole life runs on this system and if we stand out we will be branded a "hippie" enemy of the American dream.
TheGoodChap 4 months ago
@TheGoodChap Hmm, I think Daily Show viewers don't depart from the average so much. On average, anyway. :-)
I mean, they were 100% behind Obama, even while Noam was warning that he was an opportunist without political substance. I mean, "yes we can" - come on... [cringe]
FrogmortonHotchkiss 4 months ago
if buckley wants to punch someone, be sure he puts his thumb on the outside not the inside. what I love about all the highly visible republicans is how many criticise protesting the vietnam war but all the same republicans neatly got themselves out of military service: new gingrich, rush limbaugh, haley barbour, george f. will, karl rove, dick cheney (who had the gall to say, "I had other priorities than military service in the sixties). so did my two football coaches who were both killed then.
zyxquark 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
It's so weird to see these guys so young.
Madfoot713 4 months ago 17
I think I'm more in between Buckley and Chompsky. I do agree that being detached or apathic atrocities that goes on in this world is dangerous. But on the other hand if I do agree that if everyone is guility of everything then no one is guility. I wouldn't say that everyone is guility, but we can't expect our indifference will create a better world.
neosoontoretro 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
William F. Buckley, was severely deluded, imbued with prig and sprig grandiloquence, which compounded the echo-chamber impact of his dithering verbosity; notable are his a) nearly arch eye movements, b) flamboyant torso posturing, c) haughty ruse of an accent, akin in its inane superciliousness to that voiced by miss-informed Grace Kelly; both clearly unwitting fashion victims of an era touting WASP arriviste glare, d) while Grace had beauty and charm, e) Alcohol-Bill proved bore & closet-case
CarCriticAssessor 4 months ago
@CarCriticAssessor And again, on this page as well. Same comment.
thesparitan 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He's just a sore loser, mad that Chompsky whipped on him.
Seedofwinter 4 months ago 19
@Seedofwinter it's a joke?
MrTreantHugger 3 months ago
@Seedofwinter don't tell me you didn't know he is making a reference to a famous exchange with Gore Vidal.
maidenman69 3 months ago
@Seedofwinter Perfectly said.
ShaneKarma376 3 months ago
@Seedofwinter Chumpsky didn't "whip on him" he talked around everything Buckley brought up, not actually debating the points and topics but doing the chumpsky thing. He's a good debater because he (in his socialist hypocrite style) does his best to derail the debate down to his own moral level.
daPlumber702 3 months ago
@daPlumber702 William Buckley didn't even have a grip on history in this debate, Chompsky actually had to remedy his glib knowledge.
Which point do you speak of? Chompsky calls a spade a spade: Country's do what's in their interests, and us Americans wrought destruction with the Soviets
With all due respect to Buckley and his family, Buckley is a pristine example of someone educated beyond their intelligence.He is a master of English, that uses it's flowery words to cloak his ignorance
Seedofwinter 3 months ago
@Seedofwinter
Buckley comes off much better here. Chomsky's irresponsibly vague ideological definitions create meaningless moral criterion that makes the conversation impossible. Buckley just keeps making concessions to Chomsky to the point that they can't go anywhere.
Onieracraft 3 months ago
@Onieracraft No "ideological definitions" were made; the crux of Chomsky's point was that a populace's excessive ideological/behavioral tolerance and timid unwillingness to intervene are as responsible for the eventual ascension of extremism as the inherent philosophical volition necessary for an extremist's success. Buckley tried to construe the issue as a 'theological observation' ("Guilty of everything, guilty of nothing.") when no proposition had been sought.
Also: Your words are nonsense.
Anonymous61771520 2 months ago
@Anonymous61771520 He says people should be less tolerant of bad decision making by their leaders. He finds the public's patience or open-mindedness terrifying. But should we be less tolerant of Democrats, or less tolerant of Republicans? We're back where we started, trying to determine who's right. All I can conclude is that Chomsky wants less quiet discussion and more loud arguing. Even better: less loud arguing and more violent revolution. But, somehow, always in the correct direction.
Elmore3141 1 month ago
Buckley who? Relies on reductionist dichotomies-so boring, so trite.
markse4444 5 months ago
@markse4444
Better than relying on hopelessly vague ambiguities.
Onieracraft 4 months ago
Comment removed
Foreshadow44 5 months ago
Comment removed
Foreshadow44 5 months ago
I think guys like Buckley get upset since they can't just say the truth. We want a war to profit from. Period. So do that and just straight up say what you want. Profit from the war. I think I respect black racist and neo-nazi's more since they at least up front tell you want they want. If I personally invaded Afganistan with a stated goal of destroying the Taliban I would have invaded Pakistan or at least told them I am entering your nation to destroy your Taliban and treated them as a frenemy
Foreshadow44 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nick Jonah fucked Justin Bieber in the poop chute, and then he spritzed Tabasco sauce on Bieber's dick. Then Screech from Saved By The Bell showed up and rubbed Vaseline on everyone's dick and hung Christmas tree ornaments from their testicles. Next, Screech inserted a cooked bratwurst into Nick's asshole, I mean WAY in there, then he pulled it out AND ATE IT.
Thank you.
g17y5wb 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK all palestinians and all those who support them.
Fuck all arabs and anyone who supports them. Primitive semi-human mongrels.
Thank you.
g17y5wb 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chomsky was walking his poodle through the woods when he felt the urge to pee. He looked for a deserving tree and when he chose one and approached it, he was surprised to find Burl Ives sitting at the base of the tree reading the Gita. Chomsky unholstered his dick and Burl Ives grabbed it and yanked on it with over 330 Newton-metres of force. It broke. Then then Michael Moore walked up and buttfucked both of them.
Thank you.
g17y5wb 5 months ago
Comment removed
g17y5wb 5 months ago
Chomsky is regarded as one of the world's leading intellectuals, and I respect that. However, I really don't see how anyone can read what he has said and written about the Israeli-palestinian conflict and have any respect for his opinion on this subject. His viewson this complex issue are stunningly simplistic, based more on emotion than logic, and would be disastrous in the extreme if actually implemented.
oldstock1607 5 months ago
@oldstock1607 I agree. He's a prominent thinker on many levels and in many different fields. But when talking about politics, he never really says anything substantial or backs anything up with evidence, but is good at making seemingly agreeable disputes.
m0ssadic 5 months ago
@m0ssadic And yet so many people overlook this with him. I think it's probably because he is such a demi-god to leftists throughout the world that they are prepared to take literally ANYTHING he says on any given matter as gospel. And as this is such a polarized issue, Chomsky and his devotees are willing to champion what feels good to them personally and aligns with their leftist sensibilities over that which is actually practical or just.
oldstock1607 5 months ago
@oldstock1607 explain? My friend said the same thing
Sagefrakrobatik 5 months ago
Comment removed
oldstock1607 5 months ago
@Sagefrakrobatik Certainly. Which portion of that would you like me to explain?
oldstock1607 5 months ago
@oldstock1607 his views on the Palestinian Israeli issue
Sagefrakrobatik 4 months ago
@Sagefrakrobatik He advocates a two-state solution, believing that this is going to stop the violence. This stance is flawed on two very fundamental principles: 1. It ignores the fact that anti-semitism (as in anti-judaism) is a fundamental tenet of Islam. Thus, the issue is not (form the Arab perspective) about territory at all. Even if a two state solution is implemented, the violence will continue, unabated, guaranteed. Islam is so heavily predicated on jew-hatred that even muslims who have
oldstock1607 4 months ago
@oldstock1607 never had contact with Jews, for example, Pakistanis, hate jews. No Arab, no muslim state is EVER going to accept the presence of Jews on (what they see as) Arab land, and land sacred to islam. The Israelis offered the Palestinians a state long ago and the Palestinians flatly refused it. 2. It is based upon the belief that the U.S. can leverage the Israelis into ceding captured territory for this purpose. The Israeli lobby is so powerful in the U.S. that the Israelis dictate U.S.
oldstock1607 4 months ago
@oldstock1607 never had contact with Jews, for example, Pakistanis, hate jews. No Arab, no muslim state is EVER going to accept the presence of Jews on (what they see as) Arab land, and land sacred to islam. The Israelis offered the Palestinians a state long ago and the Palestinians flatly refused it. 2. It is based upon the belief that the U.S. can leverage the Israelis into ceding captured territory for this purpose. The Israeli lobby is so powerful in the U.S. that the Israelis dictate U.S.
oldstock1607 4 months ago
@oldstock1607 foreign policy to U.S. politicians, not the other way around. It is folly, not to mention supremely arrogant to think that this 1400 year-old conflict can be solved so simplistically. Now watch as people crawl out of the woodwork to try and counter what I've said about Jew-hatred in Islam. Also, Chomsky has called the Israelis "human rights violators," as if the Palestinian, if given their own state, would respect human rights. Who believes that? They don't respect human rights NOW
oldstock1607 4 months ago
@oldstock1607 Dude your so full of it wow. Bet you didnt know the Mufti of Italy said publicly that the Jews have a historic right to Israel. Ever hear of a Musilm organization known as Arabs for Israel. They use the Quran to support their argument for Israel.
Sagefrakrobatik 4 months ago
@Sagefrakrobatik the mufti of Italy, eh? lol. And that makes me "full of it?" ok kid.
oldstock1607 4 months ago
@oldstock1607 You made a generalization about a religion and I prove you wrong with an example and you dismiss it. LOL
Sagefrakrobatik 4 months ago
@Sagefrakrobatik By citing some obscure Mufti from the catholic nation of ITALY? Give me a break. Do you really wanna go there? Because if you do, I'll probably embarrass you. I have the Hadith, the Qur'an, multiple statements from Shar'ia law jurisprudence, and a multitude of statements from Imams around the world to prove my statement. And here's a tip, young man--when you hear muslims make the statement "we don't hate Jews, only zionists" take it at face value because it is definitely a LIE.
oldstock1607 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Hot fucking cocksucking two-timing bitch,
Mama's in the kitchen cooking red-hot shit,
Father's in hell, and brother's in jail,
Sister's on the corner yelling, "Pussy for sale!"
Fuckin' A.
Thank you.
g17y5wb 5 months ago
g17y5wb 5 months ago
William Frawley played Fred Mertz on I Love Lucy. Frawley FUCKED Chomsky in his rectum while simultaneously grabbing Woody Allen's woody, and wrapping his mouth around Barney's Frank. Frawley then had his own rectum violated by Anthony's Weiner.
Fred Gwynne later arrived and sprayed Kouros pour Homme on all of them, and began whistling the opening theme song to the ancient TV show "Taxi" while he completely disrobed, revealing tattoos of Jimmy Carter and Vladimir Lenin on his butt cheeks.
g17y5wb 5 months ago
Comment removed
g17y5wb 5 months ago
Comment removed
g17y5wb 5 months ago
Too bad Mr B didn't live long enough to see Chumpsky embalmed and lie next to Lenin. For you college grads, that's not John I'm referring to.
chickenwretch 5 months ago
i put 5 pounds on chomsky by first round ko
boxermaf 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@benladen9892 posted on my profile:
"LONG LIVE HITLER,LONG LIVE EGYPT,LONG LIVE IRAN,your day is coming"
What a perfect example that Nazi Himmler knew what he talked about:
1:Himmler SS head established Islamische Zentralinstitu to create Islamic leaders that would
USE ISLAMAISM AS A CARRIER FOR NATZI IDEOLOGY IN THE 21 CENTURY
2:Arabs volunteered to Nazi army-40000 in Balkan divisions.
3:Muslim brotherhood leader:
The Nazi dint finished the job.The Muslim brotherhood will finish
MordechayAriely 5 months ago
How much we've lost. Not that I ever thought Buckley was an intellectual par excellence but...seriously....compare Buckley to oh say...Andrew Breitbart or whatever wunderkind the so-called conservatives are promoting (with millions in corporate support) today. What happened to my country? Why has the discourse become so bizarre, theatrical, and famously uninformed?
Remember when being educated was something one aspired to? Something one respected in others?
Of course Chomsky keeps hope alive.
sleepcity 5 months ago
they both work for the government and rich people..its funny to see phoney bolognas pretend they are at odds with each other. Chomsky: i work for MIT the biggest contractor for the government. Buckley: Yes, I work for whoever in the corporate media will pay for my british speaking lessons and my expensive suit. maybe if we punch each other, the audience will REALLY believe we are enemies. Hilarious!
bullshit3118 5 months ago
@bullshit3118 Guilt by association is a fallacy. Look it up. Read it. Think about it. You don't think Chomsky knows that MIT is a huge military contractor? There's footage of him appealing to MIT students about this very issue from the Vietnam War era. Why does the fact that he works there mean he's a participant in this activity? Do you know how large MIT is? And your attack against Buckley is 100% ad hominem. Another logical fallacy. Perhaps you should have gone to [a better] college?
sleepcity 5 months ago
@sleepcity how about this you little fucking weasel. you work for the man, you are the man. there are plenty of colleges that could use his services, but he works THERE. im sorry, i just realized your an MIT student. Go play with your little robots. any asshole that likes WILLIAM BUCKLEY..lol....how much more idiotic can you be. You are one A PRIORI piece of shit. hows that for latin asshole? lol
bullshit3118 3 months ago
@bullshit3118 Nope, not an MIT student, though I wish I was -- it's a great American educational institution. I attend a state university. Don't you think it's a little simplistic and juvenile to refer to a massive educational institution as "The man?" It sort of makes you sound like a really self-righteous 15 year-old. I don't like Buckley, I merely pointed out how civil he appears compared with contemporary right-wing pundits. And is the name-calling really necessary? Are you really 15?
sleepcity 3 months ago
@sleepcity Who cares about my age you college boy twerp?? I think Chomsky is full of shit. I think Buckley is full of shit. Look what happened to Norman Finkelstein when he speaks out against Israel and his parents were holocuast survivors. he gets kicked out of DePaul by Zionist Derschowtiz. read about it, now he cant teach anywhere. Look at fucking Chomsky still at work and babbling away MUCH MORE than Finkelstein. he is an insider and a co-opter. and again blow it out your ass :)
bullshit3118 3 months ago
@bullshit3118 Ah, the name-calling continues. I'm guessing by your bringing up Finkelstein and his not being granted tenure (which by the way appeared to me to be unfair and the result of political influence by his many ideological opponents, but nevermind -- I'm sure you'll ignore that) ultimately portends anti-semitism to be your bag. You hate Chomsky, you hate Buckley, you hate Dershowitz (no "c" big guy), you hate Harvard, you hate MIT, and you hate me. We get it. Anything relevant to say?
sleepcity 3 months ago
@sleepcity UH OH, trying to drag me into the anti-semitism "bag" huh? Seems to me lots of jewish folk pull that trick when they going gets tough. I'm against the abuse of power, I dont fuckin care of you wave your Israeli flag or not. Why would I ignore the fascism of Finkelstein's oponnents you moron? But if you want a good jewish joke, Dershowitz does remind me of hitler. how's that for relevance sleepy?
bullshit3118 3 months ago
@bullshit3118 Dude...you just denied being an anti-semite by saying "it's the Jews!" Are you fucking daft? Do you know what the word irony means?
sleepcity 3 months ago