What I find absolutely ironic about this video, is in number 40 he says he's not that well educated on government -Which he isn't but that isn't the point- here he's pretending to be a master on how the government works. So which is it Hovind? Either you don't know what you're talking about here and have to admit it, or admit you knew you were filling out those bankruptcy forms in bad faith.
Hovind said that when our government uses capital letters, then it means that it belongs to the coporate federal government, but yet capitalized the word "God". I knew that God was nothing more but a coporation to gullible people. I can't believe I used to believe this.
You are an idiot. Your claims about income taxes and the founders are false. The fact that in all the quotes you spammed (which I have removed) FAILED TO MENTION INCOME TAX.
Progressive tax has long been a staple of how taxes were collected since the Middle Ages! Long term before income tax!
People pay income tax because the income they earned is based on the benefits society gives them, such as security, federal roads, mail service, defense and public health.
1) What's your quote have to do with anything you brought up?
2) Income tax and the progressive tax system has historical roots from the the 16th century. Your conspiracy theory means nothing.
PS Military veterans receive tax funded loans, benefits and unemployment service, not to mention funds when they transition back to civilian life. Your claims are false.
Sir I bled for this country, I am a son of an immigrant who came here escaping tyranny. The Founders came here escaping tyranny and gave specific warning to us about how opportunists will use the Constitution to their advantage. This code you cite is exactly that. We are under tyranny I know so by my own blood as a military veteran. I was born here and I know I live in a foreign country by letter of law not by the landscape of my surroundings. I am not an anarchist, I am a patriot
With regard to tax cheats and the validity of the 16th amendment, search for kuglin vs irs. Vernice Kuglin, pilot for fedex not guilty for paying taxes. The question asked where in the code is it required to pay taxes. Hovind was put in jail for his challenge to the establishment. His being a tax cheat makes him a good American. The Founders warned against direct taxes in a big way, given the governmental abuse every citizen should refuse filing income tax, only way to constrain government
Whenever someone is charged with a crime they given an indictment. That indictment lists the specific penal code and quotes the lines alleging a crime was comitted.
So to ask a court what penal code was broken it is to either "play dumb" or have completely bad lawyers.
Hovind's indictment is online. He broke: Title 26 US Code, S. 7202 and Title 31, US Code, S. 5324.
Your anarchronistic and beliefs about the "founders" don't interest judges or the law.
@Trin80ty When your dog goes bad and threatens you, you put it down. The watch dogs of our society are no longer looking out for the welfare of the majority of this nation. To cite code is just bad rhetoric that was given us by bad opportunists. I am not anarchist, I am a patriot and former military veteran, I loathe anarchists with a passion.
Hovind's linear hierarchy contains no responsibility for other people by people. Oops, sorry, that's communism. By the way, that is executed through government.
i love the conspiracy nuts that say the paper version of themselves is not them. Dur. it is a sheet of paper, you are a human being. chemically quite different. Although the entity of yourself is represented in that sheet of paper, and good frikkin luck trying to get a loan or a bank/credit union account without it. You want income in a country that tracks everything with a system, enjoy eating and living. You don't, then too bad.
Slavery was THE issue in the Civil War. I quoted from South Carolina's declaration above. Here are the SECOND and THIRD SENTENCES in Mississippi's declaration of independence (the second state to leave the union):
"Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of SLAVERY-- the GREATEST material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and MOST IMPORTANT portions of commerce of the earth."
@Trin80ty slavery wasnt the issue. slavery was legal at the start of the war. lincoln banned slavery to weaken the south. just because slavery was missippi's reason for leaving the union, doesnt mean slavery was the issue for the war. the jets and patriots (NFL) r rivals, they go to war every game. if i choose to no longer b a patriots fan cuz they were caught filming opponents, doesnt mean the entire game being played is based on filming opponents. its just my reason for picking sides
At the start of the war, Lincoln was opposed to the EXPANSION of slavery, which is why he famously debated Douglas about the Kansas Neb. Act. Lincoln was elected as someone opposed to slavery in the North (see Dredd Scott case) where it was outlawed.
After he was elected and before inauguration, states began leaving the union citing Lincoln's "hostility" to slavery and that limiting slavery who hurt their economy (see the S. Carolina's declaration).
Lincoln was willing to keep slavery in the south to keep the union together. However after two years of fighting it became clear that this would not work. Thus, in early 1863 the Emancipation Proclamation was passed to hurt the south's economy and boast morale of troops (including getting blacks to fight).
Debates about slavery was the root cause of the war. Abolishing slavery wasn't.
After Dred Scott, the North now had slaves on their law, something they were opposed to and outlawed. The Kansas-Neb. Act undid the Compromise of 1820, which allowed more slave states to enter the union. With the new land in the terrority it worried the North about losing influence and the south of losing influence. The Fugitive Slave Law prevented abolitionists from helping slaves, something they were morally opposed to.
@Trin80ty (1/2) what you stated is common knowledge. you have actually proven my point brother. if there was fighting, rioting, vote rigging in kansas, before there was ever a shot fired in the south, then the expansion of slavery could not be the issue of the war between north and south, because the north (kansas was in the union) was already fighting over expansion of slavery b4 the war.
Apparently this is not "common knowledge" because you don't understand what the fighting was about.
When Kansas became a state southerners went into Kansas to pass a law to have slavery in the state. They won and this led to fighting (slavery was later overturned in leg.). The law went against the Missouri Compromise, which banned slavery north of 36°30!
This means slavery existed beyond the agreement and undid the M. Compromise.
@Trin80ty 2/2 how could the union start a war over an issue that they themselves had not come to an agreement on? how could the union start a war on slavery, when they themselves owned slaves? point is this, abolishing slavery was just a clever ploy to gain a foothold on the enemy. i am thankful for it, but i am not fooled into believing that the north or the south, had the well being of black folks on their mind. the war was about politics, slavery issue was a byproduct of the war
The Union did not start war!! Fort Sumter was a federal military base in S. Carolina. After that state left the union citing Lincoln's "opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery," S. Carolina demanded the U.S. army leave the fort.
They did not because it was and is U.S. government land, and the S.C. military attacked. Lincoln had a choice: fight or let the union fall part. He chose to keep the union together.
@Trin80ty (1/2) even if i lack serious knowledge, i am capable of understanding what u r saying. i concede that slavery was a hot button topic during the time, and i would also agree that without slavery there would have been no war. but that still doesnt mean that was the cause. i understand that history books are written by whoever won the war. example, without 9/11 there would be no war in iraq, but 9/11 IS NOT the cause of the war in iraq.
Spoon feeding someone history lessons 500 characters at a time is exhausting. Clearly you lack basic background knowledge, which makes it difficult to discuss issues (especially when you don't even know who started the war!). If you don't know basic history then you don't understand the issues at hand. That's the point.
@Trin80ty 2/2 i respect ur direction n learning book knowledge, but i put more value in wisdom, than knowledge. more worth in reading between the lines, than reading the lines, more faith in my own observations than regurgitating things i found on google. i think deep down (if ur honest) you will have to admit that text books are slanted views...propoganda so to speak. if u truly believe that white people in the north were killing their brothers to rescue black people, ur mistaken!
Text books? Who brought that up? You do know there is a difference between scholarly monographs and text books? Or maybe you don't.
Books are slanted BY DEFINITION they make an argument and set out to prove the argument. Some do it successfully and experts, who are credentialed and spend their careers researching a topic, will support it or criticize it.
Scholarly books, not nonsense spouted from know nothings, is how history is done and argued.
@Trin80ty now THIS statement i can agree with. again my bottom line point, is this: IF YOU THINK RICH WHITE FOLKS IN THE NORTH WHERE KILLING THEIR BROTHERS OVER BLACK PEOPLE, YOU R SADLY MISTAKEN....i doubt anyone can argue that point
The claim is slavery (the issue of and debate about) was the cause of the Civil War. I gave evidence for that and you've done nothing but give incorrect claims and strawmen.
You have some serious education/comprehension issues.
@Trin80ty if cause for the war was slavery, then you are saying exactly THAT...white people in the north were killing their brothers in the south over the freedom of black folks. it just sounds ass backwards when u hear someone say it out loud. history is written by the winner of the war, u dont think its obvious these people painted themselves in a pleasing light, as tho they were freedom fighters? they no more wanted my freedom than US wanted freedom 4 the people in iraq. u know this
So after two weeks of silence you come back and twist my words so it fits a misconception you have about my claim?
I walked you through basic events that you don't even know. You don't even know basic history as proven when you claimed the North attacked the South!. I made my points clear and backed them with historical events/figures.
@Trin80ty none of your words were twisted and u kno it. ignorance means to have a lack of knowledge. if u think and i quote "WHITE MEN IN THE NORTH WERE KILLING WHITE MEN IN THE SOUTH TO FREE BLACK FOLKS" then your not even ignorant, just naive! It is a fruitless argument for me to go back and forth with u on wether whites were killing whites to save slaves. its moronic, that and i have a job my friend, i get back to this strand whenever i find time. whites killin whites over blacks HA
After two weeks you come back with a feeble attempt to defend your strawman.
I, nor no one else, here said: "WHITE MEN IN THE NORTH .... ." I did not and do not claim that.
You are quoting yourself giving a strawman. That's all.
If you have trouble understanding who said what, what the issues are as well as what side started the war (HINT: it's important to my point!) then there is no hope to continue.
I've wasted enough time with your misrepresentations.
You need to do a little studying on the Civil War. The war was not about slavery. The slavery thing didn't come later when the North figured they can win the war by getting the slaves to fight against the South. I am all for all men being equal, but the whole war started because of taxing the farmers of the South, not slavery.
No war has a single cause, but slavery was THE overriding issue. South Carolina was the first state that left the union when Lincoln was elected. On December 24, 1860 it declared:
Blacks "are incapable of becoming citizens." The North elected "a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery."
If slavery was ended "The slaveholding States will no longer have the power of self-government."
@Trin80ty If Lincoln was hostile to slavery then why is it he had his own slaves? Also have you herd of the saying the winners are the ones who write the history. Let me rephrase what I meant to get across. What started the war was not slavery.
Read South Carolina's declaration for seccession and count how many times "slave" appears in it. Here's a hint: nearly twenty times.
Anyone who claims slavery was not an issue, knows nothing about the causes of the war. Here's some of them: Kansas–Nebraska Act, Missouri Compromise of 1820, Dred Scott, John Brown, canning of Charles Sumner and the Fugitive Slave Law.
These issues provoked violent battles and intense debate about slavery long before Fort Sumter.
It was THE overriding issue that started the war. I just quoted from the South Carolina declaration. I just named specific laws and events that caused "civil war" first in Kansas. I gave specific context and issues with particular declarations about the north and the south.
If you want to bury your head in the sand and ignore facts to agree with fantasy promoted by Hovind fine. But you're wrong.
Hi there Trin80ty. I am very much enjoying some of the videos you have uploaded, particularly the debate Hovind had with Hugh Ross. I knew Hovind was a nut, but goodness I knew he was so into conspiracy stuff. May I ask though where you stand on Christianity in general? Your username suggests to me that you are probably a Christian, but I am not sure:). I am just curious.
Simply Google Kent Hovind, click on the results in Wikipedia, and you can see the real deal. Hovind just cons dimwits who know nothing about science out of their money.
How is Kent the smartest man in the US? He believes the earth was created 6000 years ago. I know he's a biologist but his faith got in the way of science. If it weren't for some scientists questioning the church or the bible or god then we would still be yelling at solar eclipses like the Vikings
@ndrthrdr1 my bad, heard some false info I suppose. I have no respect for him either way nor do I have any respect for anyone who believes the earth was created 6000 years ago
He is not and has never been a biologist, scientist nor academic.
In fact, he doesn't even have an undergraduate degree from a real school. His purchased his PhD, in the subject of Christian Education, in the mail. All he did saw pay a lump sum, not he sells his snake oil to idiots with a doctor title.
There is no proof Hovind has ever taken a basic college level science class.
@Trin80ty which just makes him look smarter cause even without a accredited education he still makes professors look stupid. I don't know why people think a degree depicts your knowledge. He still shits on a shit load of accredited scholars. A degree is just paper that society just makes out to be so significant. You can cheat your way through college but will you actually learn anything? He took the time to learn even if it wasn't at Harvard or Yale and I don't see your PHD....
@Sittinprettyxoxo He does nothing of the sort. Anyone with a diploma from an accredited college laughs at him for his ideas because they're demonstrably false. He got his "PhD" from a diploma mill. Pay them money and they hand you the diploma with nothing to back it. Years teaching High School? To his kids.
My earlier statement he claimed to not know about the tax system, yet here he is claiming that he does know. You can't be both informed and not informed simultaneously.
Disregarding someone because they don't have a PhD is trying to use argument from authority anyway. "Well he's got a PhD so you're instantly wrong." No. As long as the information presented is accurate then the person with the PhD is still wrong no matter their level of education. Most anyone with a PhD will tell you they love it when their ideas are legitimately debunked because it furthers knowledge.
@MysteriousAya "Anyone with a diploma from an accredited college laughs at him for his ideas because they're demonstrably false." I didn't know colleges started handing out diplomas first off and second, I think it's sad that you contradict your self as you do below. I don't see what him being from a non accredited college has anything to do with him proving that evolution is still NOT a science. I don't even see how you prov him wrong or where it shows he's false. Stick to the topic hun.
@Sittinprettyxoxo I was pointing out the fact that his PhD isn't real so your comment about him having one and the commenter not was completely irrelevant to the point.
Next you say that Evolution isn't science. What about it isn't scientific? Further more, even if Evolution were false, doesn't prove Creationism right by default. Creationism still has to go through the same peer review process everything else in the scientific community does.
@MysteriousAya And i was pointing out the fact that not having a phd doesnt mean that you can't prove something wrong so my previous comment is very relative. Tell me how the hell evolution is a science and not a religion. Please! I never said that it proved creationism it just proves how people will believe what they want to and not what is true. Science is something that can be observed, tested and demonstrated. Tell me, please enlighten me smh.
1) Hovind's a self-promoting convicted felon with a "PhD" purchased from a diploma mill ran from someone's home.
2) Scientists, by definition, do experiments and have their work peer-reviewed, meaning results are questioned at conferences and in literature.
3) If you don't understand the difference between science and religion, or know the basics of the scientific method, you can have a pointless conversation with people who are equally as ignorant at a creationist forum.
@jfrank197TBC, 1: The wor God is a name and shoudl be ccapped, 2: The Vikings did not yell at ecipses, 3:Hovind is not a Biologist, he has a degree in education. He is a teacher. 4: The ScineceV Religion debate is bunk created in ther 19th C, plenty of Christians accept evolution and the modern version of Creationism is 20th C.
@jfrank197TBC you know the bible talks about people who do not want to retain God in their knowledge and that God will send strong delusion..... believing that we came from rocks 4.3 billion years ago is strong delusion.
@springbokbullietjie lol when did I say we came from rocks 4.3 Ga? Humans have only been around for ~250,000 years. Maybe youre thinking of the age of the earth, which has been around for ~4.5Ga
@springbokbullietjie We're not sure yet, so let's assume that a magical, invisible sky wizard made everything appear magically out of thin nothing. "Poof!"
@ndrthrdr1 and you will never be sure till you die, even the folks who are trying to find the god particle in the hadron collider say they will most likely never find it. you see its much more logical to take that some incredible force designed everything. and that were not here by some crazy accident. i have got nothing to lose if your right, but if the bible is right you've got everything to lose and nothing to gain. are you prepared to bet your life to find out if God is real?
@springbokbullietjie ...any money to others who claim a godly need, or count on such a being to do anything, then you've wasted that time, money, effort, and/or trust for nothing.
Since it's an extremely long-shot gamble choosing one, an all-knowing god would would know that you were simply placing a bet, rather than actually believing.
At least with lottery tickets, you know that someone will win.
@springbokbullietjie Since there are countless gods that have been dreamed up, and more that haven't been dreamed up yet, and since there is no evidence that there is one (or more than one), and since there is no evidence that even if one or more actually does exist that it/he/she/they know or care what we believe, the odds of choosing one correctly AND knowing exactly how to please such a being are extremely small.
If you spend any of the one life you know you get by worshiping,praying, paying
Man, Trin80ty, you are lost. There are no tax laws first of all: See 'Freedom to Fascism'. Hovind is being persecuted for telling the truth, its that simple. IF you had any understanding of law you would know that his conviction was unconstitutional and rabidly contrived to make him look like a nut, when he's one of the smartest men in the United States. Your posts have only bolstered support for the man; simply labeling the title with the accusation of 'craziness' disputes none of what he says.
@VandalDust lifestyle? I've changed my lifestyle a number of times for the truth. Hovind isn't a threat to my lifestyle because most of what he says is BS.
I watched this whole tape yesterday, the whole 70 minutes.
It's pretty obvious how this John D'Arcy character uses biblical phrases, analogies and buzzwords to convince Hovind to participate in his tax fraud scheme. It's probably some kind of NLP thing? He gets Hovind's compliance and rapport by appealing to his core beliefs and desires. Pretty sad actually.
@Trin80ty I think you said it. Making millions, bragging about it, Not paying Caesar. Then complaining about his tax money (that wasn't paid) funding programs he doesn't like is a good way to get caught.
I was rebutting his comments in the video. Tax is not only legal but if not paid. You will be found and dealt with. As he has personally shown.
Man, I couldn't be happier that Kent Hovind followed all this whacky shit, otherwise he might still be out among all of us spouting his idiocy instead of in jail. Keep the faith, Kent! Never let "them" tell you and your "straw guy" how to live!
Wow, so on top of a fundamentalist moron and a criminal, Mr. Hovind is also a Confederate apologist? What the actual fuck?
Oh, and also Kent, the US isn't allowing you the freedom of worship/speech, it is guaranteeing you the freedom of worship/speech. You probably shouldn't be talking about this kind of stuff if you're flunking out on basic civics.
what he is talking about is so true.. when you are born, a corporation is created too in your name.. even your birth cert is traded on the stock markets.. & he is right about how your name is written too.. if its in capital letters, then this is not you.. even if you go to emigrate, they ask you if your bank/visa cards have your name in capitals or lower-case..
Freedom isnt free.. it was never free.. freedom is an illusion ..wake up!
Um there are things like taxes because PEOPLE VOTED FOR THOSE THINGS TO EXIST. Do you even know what a corporation is? What would you even trade a birth certificate for, anyway?
wrong side won the civil war ? what? what kind of retard is this hovind Ive heard of mongoloids of different types it seems a new tard is here the "hovinoid fucfktard maximus" be this creature !!!!
hovind taxes you must pay if the world you wish to live free in !!;)lolololol
Funny thing is your videos don't make him look crazy at all your never really specific about his craziness just another undercover illuminati at it's finest long live Jesus
An 'licence to preach' was never on offer to John Bunyan to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that it was not refusal to pay tax that got Kent Hovind into prison, still less was it preaching without a licence, it was TAX EVASION big difference. John Bunyan was a great man, Kent Hovind is a liar and a FALSE PREACHER. Beware!
Christianity - The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree
What's CRAZY is the DIS INFORMATION AGENTS WHO GET PAID TO POST GARBAGE LIKE THIS!
Thank God that those who see this, and have a brain cell left, know he is speaking the truth. He also is no Jesuit. Some people must have a level of dishonesty that is unimaginable. I know this man speaks the truth, and I may have not heard everything he ever said, but just listen to him on this video......IT'S THE TRUTH!
Okay, I just have to say this because if I hear something that stupid and don't correct it my head may end up recreating the movie Scanners. "...states are supposed to be Supreme." There is this thing in the Constitution called the "Supremacy Clause." Article VI, clause 2 and it says federal laws and treaties always trump the states. If saying something stupid was illegal, this would be a capital offense. And it WAS about slavery, deniers are just deluded tools.
Okay, I just have to say this because if I hear something that stupid and don't correct it my head may end up recreating the movie Scanners. "...states are supposed to be Supreme." There is this thing in the Constitution called the "Supremacy Clause." Article VI, clause 2 and it says federal laws and treaties always trump the states. If saying something stupid was illegal, this would be a capital offense.
Kent Hovind has helped many thousands of people see the lies promoted by the God-haters who control the educational institutions (a century old WRITTEN plan by the American Humanists) and the majority of the American media outlets and fools like this poster can't stand it so he wastes his time trying to deceive others.
When he stands before the King of kings and sees the wounds He took for him, He will be ashamed and filled with regret, but it will be too late then.
@BludBaut I will say Kent Hovind is very good at debating athiests. He does understand alot about tax codes and the IRS. But I would be careful listening to him about TAX CODES and IRS. When I hear things such as "South was Right" I hear Jesuit teachings. I know Hovind speaks against catholicism. But the SOUTH was tied to the Vatican. ANd if Hovind is teaching that the South was Right, he may be a Jesuit. And also some interpretations of law he may be using as a case may be wrong.
911dispatcher has been banned by the lying fool who posted this deceit and the many other, "Kent Hovind is Crazy" lies he posts. Liars and deceivers can't stand being told the truth and when they don't have the intellect to answer with knowledge or credibility, they block those who confront and challenge their stupidity, ignorance and lies.
That means I'm sure you can expect to not see my user name on this page again because cowards aren't courageous and don't like being exposed.
@BludBaut That's funny. What you're describing are the tactics employed by countless creationists here on YouTube. Any time anybody brings up a point on their video, that person gets blocked. And I have no idea why you think "God-haters" run the educational institutions. I think you were implying "atheists" when you said "God-haters", but how can someone hate something they don't believe in? BTW you're threats of eternal punishment mean NOTHING to the very people you're aiming them at.
Well the truth is, that no man is the master of any other man. Which means Kent is correct. However, being raised in a corrupted society, it's hard to see the truth.
For all who want to know, there is an abundance of evidence on the Internet. I suggest you go to: the law that never was dot com and look at the fraud which has been perpetrated on America. It will blow your mind.
The fool posting this edited video is too lazy to do his homework.
The way he enunciates certain syllables makes him seem so wonderfully nutty. Like at :53, listen to capit-AL and seconds later he'll do it again. When he really gets preaching he starts doing it all the time. Such an interesting crazy megalomaniac he is. He seemed to forget the final option: try this goofy shit in court and get laughed at all the way to jail. It's great that one of his favorite debate tactics is to say "in a court of law" the evidence would not be good, etc.
@rrpostalagain He was railroaded in court, your ignorance notwithstanding. The government and the irs were committed to shut him down because he was exposing the fraud the government and the irs continue to perpetuate.
I understand the difficulty. IF they told the truth and took the proper action, the burden on the courts and the treasury would crush our country. It's a tenuous situation not helped by your ignorance.
But you have the Internet. There's no excuse for your ignorance anymore.
What Kent Hovind is talking about in this video is true. He has alot of bravery to expose the wicked people in the system. That is alot more than I can say for the wicked people who mislabel this video and all others who speak against him. Kent Hovind is a great man. United States is a corporation which was bankrupted a number of times by the international bankers. Anyone who denies this fact is either ignorant, stupid, malicious or any combination of those three.
The only time Jury Nullification is illegal is in a bench trial. If you have a jury that decides guilt or innocence in privacy then there will always be a possibility they will nullify the case. But its only for that case! If a judge is ever empowered to declare a mistrial just because he/she thinks the jury acquitted for an "unlawful" reason then jury trials will be rendered meaningless.
Timothy Geither also tax non-payer. He is not in jail...
George Bush launched this nation into an unnecessary war...Trampling the US Constitution... He is not in jail.
Ben Bernanke/Obama team destroying the dollar by printing them at will...which harms all of America by escalating inflation and destroying savings...They are in charge.
While you may not like Kent Hovind, 10 years in prison for tax issues for a Creation Science Museum is unjust!
For heaven's sake, Karl Marx did not create the income tax. He supported the idea of a progressive income tax, which applies progressively higher tax rates as the earnings reach higher levels. Income tax started in China, during the reign of Emperor Wang Mang, at a rate of 10% of profits for skilled labour.
@fortruth8989 He has never taught at any highschool, that's just another of his lies, and the socalled "ph.d" was bought at the infamous diploma mill "Patriot Bible University". The man is a conman and a criminal and he belongs in the prison he's doing time in now. : )
the world is full of corrupt politicians who what to do whatever they want... they would even start a war for money not bothering about how many people die. This is a truth.
@fortruth8989 dude, he's a fucking retard don't just believe the shit they filled your brain with when you were a child, go watch the videos of REAL scientists proving hovind wrong with REAL science, and not with childish jokes like hovind does ...
I like how Hovind states that taxes are voluntary, well Kent by that logic so is federal imprisonment ;)
squizill 13 hours ago
What I find absolutely ironic about this video, is in number 40 he says he's not that well educated on government -Which he isn't but that isn't the point- here he's pretending to be a master on how the government works. So which is it Hovind? Either you don't know what you're talking about here and have to admit it, or admit you knew you were filling out those bankruptcy forms in bad faith.
MysteriousAya 2 weeks ago
@MysteriousAya if he admitted i don't see why you're asking this question...
Sittinprettyxoxo 1 week ago
Hovind said that when our government uses capital letters, then it means that it belongs to the coporate federal government, but yet capitalized the word "God". I knew that God was nothing more but a coporation to gullible people. I can't believe I used to believe this.
MrYouraveragejoe05 1 month ago
Kent Hovind would make a great tea party candidate.
Yep, god, guns and no taxes.
jroyals26 1 month ago
@burntownhall
You are an idiot. Your claims about income taxes and the founders are false. The fact that in all the quotes you spammed (which I have removed) FAILED TO MENTION INCOME TAX.
Progressive tax has long been a staple of how taxes were collected since the Middle Ages! Long term before income tax!
People pay income tax because the income they earned is based on the benefits society gives them, such as security, federal roads, mail service, defense and public health.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@burntownhall
I recommend you look at the history of taxes, rather than a narrow conspiracy from ideologues.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@burntownhall
1) What's your quote have to do with anything you brought up?
2) Income tax and the progressive tax system has historical roots from the the 16th century. Your conspiracy theory means nothing.
PS Military veterans receive tax funded loans, benefits and unemployment service, not to mention funds when they transition back to civilian life. Your claims are false.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
Sir I bled for this country, I am a son of an immigrant who came here escaping tyranny. The Founders came here escaping tyranny and gave specific warning to us about how opportunists will use the Constitution to their advantage. This code you cite is exactly that. We are under tyranny I know so by my own blood as a military veteran. I was born here and I know I live in a foreign country by letter of law not by the landscape of my surroundings. I am not an anarchist, I am a patriot
burntownhall 1 month ago
With regard to tax cheats and the validity of the 16th amendment, search for kuglin vs irs. Vernice Kuglin, pilot for fedex not guilty for paying taxes. The question asked where in the code is it required to pay taxes. Hovind was put in jail for his challenge to the establishment. His being a tax cheat makes him a good American. The Founders warned against direct taxes in a big way, given the governmental abuse every citizen should refuse filing income tax, only way to constrain government
burntownhall 1 month ago
@burntownhall
Whenever someone is charged with a crime they given an indictment. That indictment lists the specific penal code and quotes the lines alleging a crime was comitted.
So to ask a court what penal code was broken it is to either "play dumb" or have completely bad lawyers.
Hovind's indictment is online. He broke: Title 26 US Code, S. 7202 and Title 31, US Code, S. 5324.
Your anarchronistic and beliefs about the "founders" don't interest judges or the law.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@Trin80ty When your dog goes bad and threatens you, you put it down. The watch dogs of our society are no longer looking out for the welfare of the majority of this nation. To cite code is just bad rhetoric that was given us by bad opportunists. I am not anarchist, I am a patriot and former military veteran, I loathe anarchists with a passion.
burntownhall 1 month ago
Hovind's linear hierarchy contains no responsibility for other people by people. Oops, sorry, that's communism. By the way, that is executed through government.
garethb1961 2 months ago
i love the conspiracy nuts that say the paper version of themselves is not them. Dur. it is a sheet of paper, you are a human being. chemically quite different. Although the entity of yourself is represented in that sheet of paper, and good frikkin luck trying to get a loan or a bank/credit union account without it. You want income in a country that tracks everything with a system, enjoy eating and living. You don't, then too bad.
kelbykross1 2 months ago
Satan against God? ...boy go get yourselve a dictionary and read some books...that's not comunism, that's religion
sagabhcrew 2 months ago
(Gasp) It's all in CAPITOL LETTERS!
zeke7071 2 months ago in playlist Kent Hovind is Crazy
Slavery was THE issue in the Civil War. I quoted from South Carolina's declaration above. Here are the SECOND and THIRD SENTENCES in Mississippi's declaration of independence (the second state to leave the union):
"Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of SLAVERY-- the GREATEST material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and MOST IMPORTANT portions of commerce of the earth."
(My added emphasis.)
Trin80ty 2 months ago
@Trin80ty slavery wasnt the issue. slavery was legal at the start of the war. lincoln banned slavery to weaken the south. just because slavery was missippi's reason for leaving the union, doesnt mean slavery was the issue for the war. the jets and patriots (NFL) r rivals, they go to war every game. if i choose to no longer b a patriots fan cuz they were caught filming opponents, doesnt mean the entire game being played is based on filming opponents. its just my reason for picking sides
DawgDiggler3DEnt 1 month ago in playlist Kent Hovind vs Hugh Ross (disc 1 of 2)
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
1 of 2
At the start of the war, Lincoln was opposed to the EXPANSION of slavery, which is why he famously debated Douglas about the Kansas Neb. Act. Lincoln was elected as someone opposed to slavery in the North (see Dredd Scott case) where it was outlawed.
After he was elected and before inauguration, states began leaving the union citing Lincoln's "hostility" to slavery and that limiting slavery who hurt their economy (see the S. Carolina's declaration).
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
2 of 3
Lincoln was willing to keep slavery in the south to keep the union together. However after two years of fighting it became clear that this would not work. Thus, in early 1863 the Emancipation Proclamation was passed to hurt the south's economy and boast morale of troops (including getting blacks to fight).
Debates about slavery was the root cause of the war. Abolishing slavery wasn't.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
3 of 3
Just before the war:
After Dred Scott, the North now had slaves on their law, something they were opposed to and outlawed. The Kansas-Neb. Act undid the Compromise of 1820, which allowed more slave states to enter the union. With the new land in the terrority it worried the North about losing influence and the south of losing influence. The Fugitive Slave Law prevented abolitionists from helping slaves, something they were morally opposed to.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
There was already fighting in Kansas (deaths, murders, vote rigging) about the expansion of slavery before a single shot was fired in the South.
Preston Brooks of S. Carolina even beat Senator Sumner in THE SENATE over the issue!
And yet you want to ignore all that.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@Trin80ty (1/2) what you stated is common knowledge. you have actually proven my point brother. if there was fighting, rioting, vote rigging in kansas, before there was ever a shot fired in the south, then the expansion of slavery could not be the issue of the war between north and south, because the north (kansas was in the union) was already fighting over expansion of slavery b4 the war.
DawgDiggler3DEnt 1 month ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
Apparently this is not "common knowledge" because you don't understand what the fighting was about.
When Kansas became a state southerners went into Kansas to pass a law to have slavery in the state. They won and this led to fighting (slavery was later overturned in leg.). The law went against the Missouri Compromise, which banned slavery north of 36°30!
This means slavery existed beyond the agreement and undid the M. Compromise.
Do some homework.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@Trin80ty 2/2 how could the union start a war over an issue that they themselves had not come to an agreement on? how could the union start a war on slavery, when they themselves owned slaves? point is this, abolishing slavery was just a clever ploy to gain a foothold on the enemy. i am thankful for it, but i am not fooled into believing that the north or the south, had the well being of black folks on their mind. the war was about politics, slavery issue was a byproduct of the war
DawgDiggler3DEnt 1 month ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
The Union did not start war!! Fort Sumter was a federal military base in S. Carolina. After that state left the union citing Lincoln's "opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery," S. Carolina demanded the U.S. army leave the fort.
They did not because it was and is U.S. government land, and the S.C. military attacked. Lincoln had a choice: fight or let the union fall part. He chose to keep the union together.
You lack serious knowledge about this.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@Trin80ty (1/2) even if i lack serious knowledge, i am capable of understanding what u r saying. i concede that slavery was a hot button topic during the time, and i would also agree that without slavery there would have been no war. but that still doesnt mean that was the cause. i understand that history books are written by whoever won the war. example, without 9/11 there would be no war in iraq, but 9/11 IS NOT the cause of the war in iraq.
DawgDiggler3DEnt 1 month ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
Spoon feeding someone history lessons 500 characters at a time is exhausting. Clearly you lack basic background knowledge, which makes it difficult to discuss issues (especially when you don't even know who started the war!). If you don't know basic history then you don't understand the issues at hand. That's the point.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@Trin80ty 2/2 i respect ur direction n learning book knowledge, but i put more value in wisdom, than knowledge. more worth in reading between the lines, than reading the lines, more faith in my own observations than regurgitating things i found on google. i think deep down (if ur honest) you will have to admit that text books are slanted views...propoganda so to speak. if u truly believe that white people in the north were killing their brothers to rescue black people, ur mistaken!
DawgDiggler3DEnt 1 month ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
Text books? Who brought that up? You do know there is a difference between scholarly monographs and text books? Or maybe you don't.
Books are slanted BY DEFINITION they make an argument and set out to prove the argument. Some do it successfully and experts, who are credentialed and spend their careers researching a topic, will support it or criticize it.
Scholarly books, not nonsense spouted from know nothings, is how history is done and argued.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@Trin80ty now THIS statement i can agree with. again my bottom line point, is this: IF YOU THINK RICH WHITE FOLKS IN THE NORTH WHERE KILLING THEIR BROTHERS OVER BLACK PEOPLE, YOU R SADLY MISTAKEN....i doubt anyone can argue that point
DawgDiggler3DEnt 1 month ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
Who claimed claim that? No one said that.
The claim is slavery (the issue of and debate about) was the cause of the Civil War. I gave evidence for that and you've done nothing but give incorrect claims and strawmen.
You have some serious education/comprehension issues.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@Trin80ty if cause for the war was slavery, then you are saying exactly THAT...white people in the north were killing their brothers in the south over the freedom of black folks. it just sounds ass backwards when u hear someone say it out loud. history is written by the winner of the war, u dont think its obvious these people painted themselves in a pleasing light, as tho they were freedom fighters? they no more wanted my freedom than US wanted freedom 4 the people in iraq. u know this
DawgDiggler3DEnt 1 month ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
So after two weeks of silence you come back and twist my words so it fits a misconception you have about my claim?
I walked you through basic events that you don't even know. You don't even know basic history as proven when you claimed the North attacked the South!. I made my points clear and backed them with historical events/figures.
Your ignorance is so clear, its pathetic.
Go read a book.
Trin80ty 1 month ago
@Trin80ty none of your words were twisted and u kno it. ignorance means to have a lack of knowledge. if u think and i quote "WHITE MEN IN THE NORTH WERE KILLING WHITE MEN IN THE SOUTH TO FREE BLACK FOLKS" then your not even ignorant, just naive! It is a fruitless argument for me to go back and forth with u on wether whites were killing whites to save slaves. its moronic, that and i have a job my friend, i get back to this strand whenever i find time. whites killin whites over blacks HA
DawgDiggler3DEnt 3 weeks ago
@DawgDiggler3DEnt
After two weeks you come back with a feeble attempt to defend your strawman.
I, nor no one else, here said: "WHITE MEN IN THE NORTH .... ." I did not and do not claim that.
You are quoting yourself giving a strawman. That's all.
If you have trouble understanding who said what, what the issues are as well as what side started the war (HINT: it's important to my point!) then there is no hope to continue.
I've wasted enough time with your misrepresentations.
Trin80ty 2 weeks ago
You need to do a little studying on the Civil War. The war was not about slavery. The slavery thing didn't come later when the North figured they can win the war by getting the slaves to fight against the South. I am all for all men being equal, but the whole war started because of taxing the farmers of the South, not slavery.
jeffeharkins 2 months ago 4
@jeffeharkins
No war has a single cause, but slavery was THE overriding issue. South Carolina was the first state that left the union when Lincoln was elected. On December 24, 1860 it declared:
Blacks "are incapable of becoming citizens." The North elected "a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery."
If slavery was ended "The slaveholding States will no longer have the power of self-government."
Trin80ty 2 months ago
@Trin80ty If Lincoln was hostile to slavery then why is it he had his own slaves? Also have you herd of the saying the winners are the ones who write the history. Let me rephrase what I meant to get across. What started the war was not slavery.
jeffeharkins 2 months ago
@jeffeharkins Don't worry, maybe one day, you'll actually realize it was slavery. Until then, I get some new comedy.
Sean1Sullivan 2 months ago
@jeffeharkins
Read South Carolina's declaration for seccession and count how many times "slave" appears in it. Here's a hint: nearly twenty times.
Anyone who claims slavery was not an issue, knows nothing about the causes of the war. Here's some of them: Kansas–Nebraska Act, Missouri Compromise of 1820, Dred Scott, John Brown, canning of Charles Sumner and the Fugitive Slave Law.
These issues provoked violent battles and intense debate about slavery long before Fort Sumter.
Trin80ty 2 months ago
@Trin80ty I never said that slavery was not an issue it was not what started the war.
jeffeharkins 2 months ago
@jeffeharkins
It was THE overriding issue that started the war. I just quoted from the South Carolina declaration. I just named specific laws and events that caused "civil war" first in Kansas. I gave specific context and issues with particular declarations about the north and the south.
If you want to bury your head in the sand and ignore facts to agree with fantasy promoted by Hovind fine. But you're wrong.
Trin80ty 2 months ago
@jeffeharkins nope. you're incorrect it was about several things, tax was one, slavery was another
Sittinprettyxoxo 1 week ago
This guy is so lol.
TheDeistAngle 3 months ago in playlist Kent Hovind is Crazy
Hi there Trin80ty. I am very much enjoying some of the videos you have uploaded, particularly the debate Hovind had with Hugh Ross. I knew Hovind was a nut, but goodness I knew he was so into conspiracy stuff. May I ask though where you stand on Christianity in general? Your username suggests to me that you are probably a Christian, but I am not sure:). I am just curious.
Thanks for uploading these videos.
ukchristian28 5 months ago in playlist Kent Hovind is Crazy
@danielcomments
Did you know a jury agreed with the federal government and convicted Hovind of 58 felonies, including obstruction of justice and tax cheating?
I'd becareful about agreeing with his legal advice.
Trin80ty 5 months ago
@Trin80ty what jury? when? where?
Sittinprettyxoxo 1 week ago
Simply Google Kent Hovind, click on the results in Wikipedia, and you can see the real deal. Hovind just cons dimwits who know nothing about science out of their money.
ndrthrdr1 6 months ago in playlist Kent Hovind is Crazy
@ndrthrdr1 oh yes, wikipedia, the most reliable source on the net -_____________-
Sittinprettyxoxo 1 week ago
How is Kent the smartest man in the US? He believes the earth was created 6000 years ago. I know he's a biologist but his faith got in the way of science. If it weren't for some scientists questioning the church or the bible or god then we would still be yelling at solar eclipses like the Vikings
jfrank197TBC 6 months ago
@jfrank197TBC A biologist? Sure, and I'm an astronaut. His "PhD" is from a diploma mill.
ndrthrdr1 6 months ago in playlist Kent Hovind is Crazy 2
@ndrthrdr1 my bad, heard some false info I suppose. I have no respect for him either way nor do I have any respect for anyone who believes the earth was created 6000 years ago
jfrank197TBC 4 months ago
@jfrank197TBC
He is not and has never been a biologist, scientist nor academic.
In fact, he doesn't even have an undergraduate degree from a real school. His purchased his PhD, in the subject of Christian Education, in the mail. All he did saw pay a lump sum, not he sells his snake oil to idiots with a doctor title.
There is no proof Hovind has ever taken a basic college level science class.
Trin80ty 5 months ago 11
@Trin80ty which just makes him look smarter cause even without a accredited education he still makes professors look stupid. I don't know why people think a degree depicts your knowledge. He still shits on a shit load of accredited scholars. A degree is just paper that society just makes out to be so significant. You can cheat your way through college but will you actually learn anything? He took the time to learn even if it wasn't at Harvard or Yale and I don't see your PHD....
Sittinprettyxoxo 1 week ago
@Sittinprettyxoxo He does nothing of the sort. Anyone with a diploma from an accredited college laughs at him for his ideas because they're demonstrably false. He got his "PhD" from a diploma mill. Pay them money and they hand you the diploma with nothing to back it. Years teaching High School? To his kids.
My earlier statement he claimed to not know about the tax system, yet here he is claiming that he does know. You can't be both informed and not informed simultaneously.
MysteriousAya 1 week ago
Disregarding someone because they don't have a PhD is trying to use argument from authority anyway. "Well he's got a PhD so you're instantly wrong." No. As long as the information presented is accurate then the person with the PhD is still wrong no matter their level of education. Most anyone with a PhD will tell you they love it when their ideas are legitimately debunked because it furthers knowledge.
MysteriousAya 1 week ago
@MysteriousAya "Anyone with a diploma from an accredited college laughs at him for his ideas because they're demonstrably false." I didn't know colleges started handing out diplomas first off and second, I think it's sad that you contradict your self as you do below. I don't see what him being from a non accredited college has anything to do with him proving that evolution is still NOT a science. I don't even see how you prov him wrong or where it shows he's false. Stick to the topic hun.
Sittinprettyxoxo 1 week ago
@Sittinprettyxoxo I was pointing out the fact that his PhD isn't real so your comment about him having one and the commenter not was completely irrelevant to the point.
Next you say that Evolution isn't science. What about it isn't scientific? Further more, even if Evolution were false, doesn't prove Creationism right by default. Creationism still has to go through the same peer review process everything else in the scientific community does.
MysteriousAya 1 week ago
@MysteriousAya And i was pointing out the fact that not having a phd doesnt mean that you can't prove something wrong so my previous comment is very relative. Tell me how the hell evolution is a science and not a religion. Please! I never said that it proved creationism it just proves how people will believe what they want to and not what is true. Science is something that can be observed, tested and demonstrated. Tell me, please enlighten me smh.
Sittinprettyxoxo 1 week ago
@Sittinprettyxoxo
1) Hovind's a self-promoting convicted felon with a "PhD" purchased from a diploma mill ran from someone's home.
2) Scientists, by definition, do experiments and have their work peer-reviewed, meaning results are questioned at conferences and in literature.
3) If you don't understand the difference between science and religion, or know the basics of the scientific method, you can have a pointless conversation with people who are equally as ignorant at a creationist forum.
Trin80ty 4 days ago
@jfrank197TBC, 1: The wor God is a name and shoudl be ccapped, 2: The Vikings did not yell at ecipses, 3:Hovind is not a Biologist, he has a degree in education. He is a teacher. 4: The ScineceV Religion debate is bunk created in ther 19th C, plenty of Christians accept evolution and the modern version of Creationism is 20th C.
ZARIYL 4 months ago
@jfrank197TBC you know the bible talks about people who do not want to retain God in their knowledge and that God will send strong delusion..... believing that we came from rocks 4.3 billion years ago is strong delusion.
springbokbullietjie 4 months ago
@springbokbullietjie lol when did I say we came from rocks 4.3 Ga? Humans have only been around for ~250,000 years. Maybe youre thinking of the age of the earth, which has been around for ~4.5Ga
jfrank197TBC 4 months ago
@jfrank197TBC and how did we come about 250,000 ago? where did life begin?
springbokbullietjie 4 months ago
@springbokbullietjie We're not sure yet, so let's assume that a magical, invisible sky wizard made everything appear magically out of thin nothing. "Poof!"
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
@ndrthrdr1 and you will never be sure till you die, even the folks who are trying to find the god particle in the hadron collider say they will most likely never find it. you see its much more logical to take that some incredible force designed everything. and that were not here by some crazy accident. i have got nothing to lose if your right, but if the bible is right you've got everything to lose and nothing to gain. are you prepared to bet your life to find out if God is real?
springbokbullietjie 4 months ago
@springbokbullietjie ...any money to others who claim a godly need, or count on such a being to do anything, then you've wasted that time, money, effort, and/or trust for nothing.
Since it's an extremely long-shot gamble choosing one, an all-knowing god would would know that you were simply placing a bet, rather than actually believing.
At least with lottery tickets, you know that someone will win.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
@springbokbullietjie Since there are countless gods that have been dreamed up, and more that haven't been dreamed up yet, and since there is no evidence that there is one (or more than one), and since there is no evidence that even if one or more actually does exist that it/he/she/they know or care what we believe, the odds of choosing one correctly AND knowing exactly how to please such a being are extremely small.
If you spend any of the one life you know you get by worshiping,praying, paying
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
Man, Trin80ty, you are lost. There are no tax laws first of all: See 'Freedom to Fascism'. Hovind is being persecuted for telling the truth, its that simple. IF you had any understanding of law you would know that his conviction was unconstitutional and rabidly contrived to make him look like a nut, when he's one of the smartest men in the United States. Your posts have only bolstered support for the man; simply labeling the title with the accusation of 'craziness' disputes none of what he says.
DecepticonJohn 6 months ago
@DecepticonJohn
"There are no tax laws first of all..."
Get help. YOU are lost.
Don't go around believing rants from tax cheats like Aaron Russo.
I'll quote the Sixteenth Amendment of the US Constitution:
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes..."
Quick, go put your head in the conspiracy sand and run from the facts.
Trin80ty 5 months ago 8
@DecepticonJohn
I just clicked your youtube page.
I notice you favorited a video on the "illuminati reptilian bloodline" and an Obama conspiracy.
Get a life. A "illuminati reptilian bloodline"? I hope you're joking.
Trin80ty 5 months ago 4
@DecepticonJohn i agree with you people are lost
kathynsam123 4 months ago
@DecepticonJohn Trin80ty pwned you!
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
@DecepticonJohn Someones been watching too much Zeitgeist. Some of the stuff in there might be true, but at least 95% of it is highly exaggerated.
mdt2189 4 months ago
Kent Hovind wanted the Confederacy to win the Civil War? Well fuck.
weirddudeonice 7 months ago
HOVIND JUST SUCKS!
CyberWeez 7 months ago 4
haha. wow-uh-wooey! people need an education.
bryanpicchiottino 7 months ago
@Steelsixtysix why?
ProMajtas 7 months ago in playlist Kent Hovind is Crazy
This has been flagged as spam show
what is so crazy about that?
ProMajtas 7 months ago in playlist Kent Hovind is Crazy
@VandalDust lifestyle? I've changed my lifestyle a number of times for the truth. Hovind isn't a threat to my lifestyle because most of what he says is BS.
clintonskakun 8 months ago
Even here he's picking and choosing from the bible.
Of course i'll get the random accusation of 'taking it out of context', but it seems to me that Romans 13:6 reads:
"This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing."
mindwis3 8 months ago in playlist Kent Hovind is Crazy
Why doesn't Hovind have a slave if he is trying to obey the law of the bible? COooool
Singlerity 8 months ago
I watched this whole tape yesterday, the whole 70 minutes.
It's pretty obvious how this John D'Arcy character uses biblical phrases, analogies and buzzwords to convince Hovind to participate in his tax fraud scheme. It's probably some kind of NLP thing? He gets Hovind's compliance and rapport by appealing to his core beliefs and desires. Pretty sad actually.
floppel 8 months ago
Taxes are paid at the point of a gun. Don"t believe me?
Try not paying, They will show you the gun. Kent has seen it daily for years now, and years to come.
pumpstations 8 months ago
@pumpstations
Yep. Make a million dollars each year, never pay taxes and brag about it is a good way to get arrested.
What's your point?
Trin80ty 8 months ago
@Trin80ty I think you said it. Making millions, bragging about it, Not paying Caesar. Then complaining about his tax money (that wasn't paid) funding programs he doesn't like is a good way to get caught.
I was rebutting his comments in the video. Tax is not only legal but if not paid. You will be found and dealt with. As he has personally shown.
pumpstations 8 months ago
WTF is he talking about? Redeeming the straw man? Did he give up his citizenship?
floppel 8 months ago
Man, I couldn't be happier that Kent Hovind followed all this whacky shit, otherwise he might still be out among all of us spouting his idiocy instead of in jail. Keep the faith, Kent! Never let "them" tell you and your "straw guy" how to live!
jerico641 10 months ago
"The income tax is voluntary" and kent hovind is now in prison because of this. Doesn't sound too voluntary to me
viper100200 10 months ago
@viper100200
1) Hovind was arrested for failure to withhold PAYROLL taxes, structuring bank withdrawals and obstruction of justice.
2) He was convicted of ALL those crimes.
3) Income tax had NOTHING to do with Hovind's case!
4) People who earn income must tax on it, which is what the Sixteenth Amendment of the US Constitution is about.
5) 16th amendment: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes..."
6) More proof Hovind supporters are clueless about so much.
Trin80ty 10 months ago
lol GOD is in capital letters.
Quinns0Channel 10 months ago
Wow, so on top of a fundamentalist moron and a criminal, Mr. Hovind is also a Confederate apologist? What the actual fuck?
Oh, and also Kent, the US isn't allowing you the freedom of worship/speech, it is guaranteeing you the freedom of worship/speech. You probably shouldn't be talking about this kind of stuff if you're flunking out on basic civics.
ChaosSamusX 11 months ago
@ChaosSamusX
You should hear worse things from another more hardcore conspiracy theorist named Eric Phelps. Just youtube black nationationalism Eric Phelps.
Shotosboring1stpick 9 months ago
@Shotosboring1stpick
I didn't need to watch any of the videos. The titles to his videos were already crazy enough.
ChaosSamusX 9 months ago
Wow, so on top of a fundamentalist moron and a criminal, Mr. Hovind is also a Confederate apologist? What the actual fuck?
ChaosSamusX 11 months ago
@ChaosSamusX we southerners don't want him, you fucking carpet baggers can have him.
bokprop420 10 months ago
@bokprop420
Carpetbagger? I'm from Canada, and we sure as hell don't want him.
ChaosSamusX 10 months ago
@ChaosSamusX it was humor.
bokprop420 10 months ago
We're still trying to understand the many presentations of mental illness.
charadester 11 months ago
what he is talking about is so true.. when you are born, a corporation is created too in your name.. even your birth cert is traded on the stock markets.. & he is right about how your name is written too.. if its in capital letters, then this is not you.. even if you go to emigrate, they ask you if your bank/visa cards have your name in capitals or lower-case..
Freedom isnt free.. it was never free.. freedom is an illusion ..wake up!
illuminatisos 11 months ago 2
@illuminatisos
Hovind and anyone else who believes this stuff is an idiot.
I can see from your post and channel you can't even write in coherent sentences and you're a Hovind supporter. Like a hand in a glove.
"he is right about how your name is written too.. if its in capital letters"
Get help, seriously.
Trin80ty 11 months ago 2
@illuminatisos exactly. these blind people are sad excuses for people
pkmuffun 11 months ago
@illuminatisos
Um there are things like taxes because PEOPLE VOTED FOR THOSE THINGS TO EXIST. Do you even know what a corporation is? What would you even trade a birth certificate for, anyway?
ChaosSamusX 10 months ago
wrong side won the civil war ? what? what kind of retard is this hovind Ive heard of mongoloids of different types it seems a new tard is here the "hovinoid fucfktard maximus" be this creature !!!!
hovind taxes you must pay if the world you wish to live free in !!;)lolololol
pfunkmalfunkshun 1 year ago
Funny thing is your videos don't make him look crazy at all your never really specific about his craziness just another undercover illuminati at it's finest long live Jesus
illusionistik 1 year ago
@illusionistik Umm jesus is dead, last time i checked.
Smexen 1 year ago
@illusionistik
Yep. Hovind's not an idiot and this is all part of a conspiracy.
/sarcasm.
Trin80ty 11 months ago 2
@Trin80ty Your right Hovind isn't crazy and it is all part of a conspiracy. /no sarcasm.
Mr308winmag 8 months ago
An 'licence to preach' was never on offer to John Bunyan to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that it was not refusal to pay tax that got Kent Hovind into prison, still less was it preaching without a licence, it was TAX EVASION big difference. John Bunyan was a great man, Kent Hovind is a liar and a FALSE PREACHER. Beware!
scarletharlot69 1 year ago
he really is crackers and also very boring
scarletharlot69 1 year ago
he really is crackers
scarletharlot69 1 year ago
Christianity - The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree
bellyzbad 1 year ago
whats so crazy about this but the title
metubegirl69er 1 year ago
you are crazy!!!
thinking that the bible meant millions of years for each day it said
DAY
yes when the sun is out
yes
CarloOnU2ube 1 year ago
What's CRAZY is the DIS INFORMATION AGENTS WHO GET PAID TO POST GARBAGE LIKE THIS!
Thank God that those who see this, and have a brain cell left, know he is speaking the truth. He also is no Jesuit. Some people must have a level of dishonesty that is unimaginable. I know this man speaks the truth, and I may have not heard everything he ever said, but just listen to him on this video......IT'S THE TRUTH!
klepto0oe 1 year ago
@klepto0oe It's the truth for YOU cause you're an uneducated brainwashed religious nut.
Reasonwillwin 1 year ago
Okay, I just have to say this because if I hear something that stupid and don't correct it my head may end up recreating the movie Scanners. "...states are supposed to be Supreme." There is this thing in the Constitution called the "Supremacy Clause." Article VI, clause 2 and it says federal laws and treaties always trump the states. If saying something stupid was illegal, this would be a capital offense. And it WAS about slavery, deniers are just deluded tools.
newfrickinshow 1 year ago
Okay, I just have to say this because if I hear something that stupid and don't correct it my head may end up recreating the movie Scanners. "...states are supposed to be Supreme." There is this thing in the Constitution called the "Supremacy Clause." Article VI, clause 2 and it says federal laws and treaties always trump the states. If saying something stupid was illegal, this would be a capital offense.
newfrickinshow 1 year ago
Kent Hovind has helped many thousands of people see the lies promoted by the God-haters who control the educational institutions (a century old WRITTEN plan by the American Humanists) and the majority of the American media outlets and fools like this poster can't stand it so he wastes his time trying to deceive others.
When he stands before the King of kings and sees the wounds He took for him, He will be ashamed and filled with regret, but it will be too late then.
BludBaut 1 year ago
@BludBaut I will say Kent Hovind is very good at debating athiests. He does understand alot about tax codes and the IRS. But I would be careful listening to him about TAX CODES and IRS. When I hear things such as "South was Right" I hear Jesuit teachings. I know Hovind speaks against catholicism. But the SOUTH was tied to the Vatican. ANd if Hovind is teaching that the South was Right, he may be a Jesuit. And also some interpretations of law he may be using as a case may be wrong.
LiquidSmooth 1 year ago
911dispatcher has been banned by the lying fool who posted this deceit and the many other, "Kent Hovind is Crazy" lies he posts. Liars and deceivers can't stand being told the truth and when they don't have the intellect to answer with knowledge or credibility, they block those who confront and challenge their stupidity, ignorance and lies.
That means I'm sure you can expect to not see my user name on this page again because cowards aren't courageous and don't like being exposed.
BludBaut 1 year ago
@BludBaut That's funny. What you're describing are the tactics employed by countless creationists here on YouTube. Any time anybody brings up a point on their video, that person gets blocked. And I have no idea why you think "God-haters" run the educational institutions. I think you were implying "atheists" when you said "God-haters", but how can someone hate something they don't believe in? BTW you're threats of eternal punishment mean NOTHING to the very people you're aiming them at.
aaronbobaron 10 months ago
Well the truth is, that no man is the master of any other man. Which means Kent is correct. However, being raised in a corrupted society, it's hard to see the truth.
MrSmibby 1 year ago
Kent Hovind, you are still my hero!
Zegatrox 1 year ago
Kent Hovind FTW ! you guys are idiots... REAL IDIOTS
DannyTheRanger 1 year ago
Obey the law?
You're a lying idiot.
For all who want to know, there is an abundance of evidence on the Internet. I suggest you go to: the law that never was dot com and look at the fraud which has been perpetrated on America. It will blow your mind.
The fool posting this edited video is too lazy to do his homework.
911dispatcher 1 year ago
The way he enunciates certain syllables makes him seem so wonderfully nutty. Like at :53, listen to capit-AL and seconds later he'll do it again. When he really gets preaching he starts doing it all the time. Such an interesting crazy megalomaniac he is. He seemed to forget the final option: try this goofy shit in court and get laughed at all the way to jail. It's great that one of his favorite debate tactics is to say "in a court of law" the evidence would not be good, etc.
rrpostalagain 1 year ago
@rrpostalagain He was railroaded in court, your ignorance notwithstanding. The government and the irs were committed to shut him down because he was exposing the fraud the government and the irs continue to perpetuate.
I understand the difficulty. IF they told the truth and took the proper action, the burden on the courts and the treasury would crush our country. It's a tenuous situation not helped by your ignorance.
But you have the Internet. There's no excuse for your ignorance anymore.
911dispatcher 1 year ago
@911dispatcher
so you are telling me that you have followed the steps and are now living without government affiliation??
do you KNOW what that actually means?
it would mean you cannot BE a 911dispatcher.....
seems your fantasies are colliding... i wonder which will survive your cognitive disonance....
silly troll, believes everything he reads on the internet....
Kissing Hank's Ass would be a great story for you to read.... try it on tell me what you think.
Arteanor 1 year ago
@911dispatcher you are so right
MrTheflyingman 1 year ago
So...you can break the law if you follow God?
thegreaterfuture 1 year ago
What Kent Hovind is talking about in this video is true. He has alot of bravery to expose the wicked people in the system. That is alot more than I can say for the wicked people who mislabel this video and all others who speak against him. Kent Hovind is a great man. United States is a corporation which was bankrupted a number of times by the international bankers. Anyone who denies this fact is either ignorant, stupid, malicious or any combination of those three.
ednja 1 year ago
The only time Jury Nullification is illegal is in a bench trial. If you have a jury that decides guilt or innocence in privacy then there will always be a possibility they will nullify the case. But its only for that case! If a judge is ever empowered to declare a mistrial just because he/she thinks the jury acquitted for an "unlawful" reason then jury trials will be rendered meaningless.
mjh012363 1 year ago
As man created god. So he should do as we tell.
Meeeeean 1 year ago
Hey! I'm innocent! The sodomite atheist criminals who wanted to silence me lied about my ministery!
RevKentHovind 1 year ago
Timothy Geither also tax non-payer. He is not in jail...
George Bush launched this nation into an unnecessary war...Trampling the US Constitution... He is not in jail.
Ben Bernanke/Obama team destroying the dollar by printing them at will...which harms all of America by escalating inflation and destroying savings...They are in charge.
While you may not like Kent Hovind, 10 years in prison for tax issues for a Creation Science Museum is unjust!
mrlc123456 1 year ago
@mrlc123456 No no! I love being sodomized in prison every day.
RevKentHovind 1 year ago
Actually... if you erased the top part which lists "God" that chart would actually make sense.
RichardForkins 1 year ago
Fucking....moron...
lisamariefan 1 year ago
You say this guy is crazy, but he seems to make sense to me.
Temple420org 1 year ago
@Temple420org He seems to make sense to you because you're as crazy as Kent Hovind, maybe?
karadan100 1 year ago
I wish more dogmatists would stop filling in tax forms. The world would become a better place !
retepvosnul 1 year ago
For heaven's sake, Karl Marx did not create the income tax. He supported the idea of a progressive income tax, which applies progressively higher tax rates as the earnings reach higher levels. Income tax started in China, during the reign of Emperor Wang Mang, at a rate of 10% of profits for skilled labour.
bernardcz92 1 year ago
"i'm gonna be accountable to god." how's that working out for you kent?
BillKiernan 1 year ago
@BillKiernan How about you be smart and rebel? Instead of being stupid sheeple person like you are.
Mark123USA 1 year ago
so much for "give unto ceasar that which is ceasars"
BillKiernan 1 year ago
All you scoffers make the same claims, yet never give any examples.
MPashaS 1 year ago
i wonder how his butt feels in prison
gresavage 1 year ago
@gresavage i hope they're running trains on that ass daily.
BillKiernan 1 year ago
Hahahahahaha! What an extremely funny justification for withholding on his employees and taxes! I hope they rape him good in prison!
lurconis666 1 year ago
@fortruth8989 He has never taught at any highschool, that's just another of his lies, and the socalled "ph.d" was bought at the infamous diploma mill "Patriot Bible University". The man is a conman and a criminal and he belongs in the prison he's doing time in now. : )
winterstellar 1 year ago
the world is full of corrupt politicians who what to do whatever they want... they would even start a war for money not bothering about how many people die. This is a truth.
jddqd 1 year ago 2
cut god out of that equation and your good to go
aARIESsSs 1 year ago
@fortruth8989 dude, he's a fucking retard don't just believe the shit they filled your brain with when you were a child, go watch the videos of REAL scientists proving hovind wrong with REAL science, and not with childish jokes like hovind does ...
PS: hovind isn't a real scientist ...
whiteraider 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this guy is not crazy,
he is awake and trying to wake us brainwashed AI humans up!
he has a true scienetist
moemoe20092007 2 years ago
Kent Hovind is a burbling fountain of endless bullshit.
There isn't a single human being on the planet who can spout nothing but nonsense for hours the way Hovind does.
And both his idiotic spawn and VenomFangX have tried!
Shavarnarak 2 years ago 21
I love how his "dissertation" is posted in the bathrooms at the NCSE offices.
doctormurray91 2 years ago
@Shavarnarak Eh... the so-called wildlife conservationist Paul Watson can come pretty close.
NRen2k5 1 year ago
I enjoy being sodomized in prison.
RevKentHovind 1 year ago
I think it would be cruel and unusual punishment to have to be his cell mate.
Retrieverman1 1 year ago
@Retrieverman1 you don't bother to think.
911dispatcher 1 year ago
@Shavarnarak You fail to give yourself due credit!
911dispatcher 1 year ago
@Shavarnarak I beg to differ, Ken Ham can more than match Kent Hovind for Bullshit!
adey5 1 year ago