Das Lügenorganisation IPCC verabschiedet sich von seinen pseudo-wissenschaftlichen Lügen!
Googleeingabe: "IPCC scientists test the Exit doors"
Googleeingabe: "Klimalügner IPCC am Ende"
Wie schön, dass Leute wie Latif, Schellnhuber, Rahmstorf , Lesch usw. immer so schön im Fernsehen auftraten. Da weiß man doch wenigstens WEN man mit Strafanzeigen und Schadenersatzklagen zu überziehen hat!
In 1970, when environmentalists were making predictions of man made global cooling and the threat of an ice age, what kind of government policy should we have undertaken to prevent such a calamity?
When Ehrlich predicted that England would not exist in the year 2000, what steps should the British Parliament have taken in 1970 to prevent such a dire outcome?
Finally, what makes us think that environmental alarmism is any more correct today than yesterday?
I think it has become a serious an pressing issue. While I do believe it is part of a natural cycle on our planet I also believe we've been a catalyst, accelerating the next cycle phase notably. So the next dry spell and ice age are probably going to occur sooner than they inevitably would have anyways, but nothing as dramatic as within the next few decades. As for the cause: Burning fossil fuels at an alarming rate combined with deforestation all over the globe.
This has been flagged as spam show
Übrigens!
Das Lügenorganisation IPCC verabschiedet sich von seinen pseudo-wissenschaftlichen Lügen!
Googleeingabe: "IPCC scientists test the Exit doors"
Googleeingabe: "Klimalügner IPCC am Ende"
Wie schön, dass Leute wie Latif, Schellnhuber, Rahmstorf , Lesch usw. immer so schön im Fernsehen auftraten. Da weiß man doch wenigstens WEN man mit Strafanzeigen und Schadenersatzklagen zu überziehen hat!
MultiNewMedia 3 months ago
HAIKU
I hatch! Crawl! And swim!
Oh how I love my sweet life,
But—why’s the sea warm?
—A Green Sea Turtle
StephanieLisaTara 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In 1970, when environmentalists were making predictions of man made global cooling and the threat of an ice age, what kind of government policy should we have undertaken to prevent such a calamity?
When Ehrlich predicted that England would not exist in the year 2000, what steps should the British Parliament have taken in 1970 to prevent such a dire outcome?
Finally, what makes us think that environmental alarmism is any more correct today than yesterday?
n5ifi 1 year ago
Accurate for the most part, but CO2 is not a "toxic" gas, it feeds plants. What we're worried out is the warming effect it has.
DeadlyV1RU5 1 year ago
Good point
Rico4U2 1 year ago
This is facts.
It is not controversial because it states ..."scientists fear" This point is not in doubt.
Well done.
riddyzarzoff 2 years ago
Perhaps questionable is a better word... And I think I meant statement in stead of information XD
Rico4U2 2 years ago
I think it has become a serious an pressing issue. While I do believe it is part of a natural cycle on our planet I also believe we've been a catalyst, accelerating the next cycle phase notably. So the next dry spell and ice age are probably going to occur sooner than they inevitably would have anyways, but nothing as dramatic as within the next few decades. As for the cause: Burning fossil fuels at an alarming rate combined with deforestation all over the globe.
JasonWardStudios 3 years ago
@JasonWardStudios
In order of priority (most significant contributers) as I remember from enviro studies with UN:
1) Fossil fuel emissions (CO2 from vehicles, power plants, homes, factories
2) Cattle (methane @ 5 times the GHG potency of co2)
donsjuand 10 months ago
Thank you very much for the documentation
10/10
5*
PC4TW 3 years ago