Added: 2 years ago
From: smitty121981
Views: 23,909
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (681)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it took 10 years ... but finally truth prevailed :-)

  • Aliens are among us........hahaha get a grip

  • Delusional Yanky Twats

  • FREAKS

    

  • FUCKING PUSSIES

  • Hi! I have a friend in China that is confused. Can you help me explain to her how if the US government is evil it allows people to freely demonstrate the fact that it murdered thousands of it's own citizens and then allows them to freely tape it and post it online?

    She doesn't understand this because she tried to demonstrate something against her government and was thrown in jail. She's out now but confused. Any help will be great! Thanks!

  • God Bless America!!! THE PEOPLE WILL PREVAIL!!!!

  • Good ideas, good points, good will, but theres nobody with millions in hes pockets protesting atm.. thats the problem.

  • This needs hits.

  • Luke Rudkowski is my hero!

  • the only thing im concern is that a dickhead is always deleting channel that he or she did not create that what pisses me off the most!

  • I aspire to live long enough to see the truth come out - that 9/11 was an inside job to make possible the wars wanted by The Project for a New American Century. People get ready - the 10th anniversary of what was a massively larger Reichstag Fire (1933), of a massively bigger Pearl Harbour (1941) approaches. 'Truthers' be strong. One Love!

  • Comment removed

  • Just look at these sheep.. Where's Al-Qaeda when you need them!

  • Soft Watch at the Moment of First Explosion, c.1954 Art by Salvador Dali

    Can you see 9/11, earthquake, solar flares, ice and voulcanic mountains and gamma ray shadows and 12960 year (LIFE) code? It is so touching when murderers make memorial for their victims...Anunnaki semi-god illuminati... Yoke (Joke) and Rope believers...super intelligent arrogant murderers

    see Ford logo..Isabella and Ferdinand coat of arms..GE logo

    Rulers of our World..but they soon will lose their control over us.

  • in ur describtion you said 1000 architects and engineers but it is now over 1500 architects and engineers

  • @abaguley25

    thank you, updated.

  • @abaguley25 Yes..and over 12 000 supporters from colleagues all over the world. :-D

  • @MissMaria1988 LOL, you do realize that there are over 1.5 million employed engineers in the united states alone, right? That's like .001 percent.

  • These guys are on the right path. I will march alongside them any day.

  • Talk to everyone about it. Missing gold? Molten pools and thermite debris? What do the Zionists take us for? Maybe if the Zionists had studied human nature, instead of just studying the accumulation of wealth and power though coercion, they wouldn't be in such a position of evil. I hope military finds out who REALLy did 9-11 and wipe them muther effers of the face of the fukin planet!!!

  • The US gov't is one of the most corrupt in history, but this is just a few clowns in a city of 8 million. Move on.

  • we must organiye the biggest protest this year....10k people..MINIMUM"

  • Still amazes me how you will never even hear the mention of 9/11 or Larry Silverstein or Building 7 or any of the obvious evidence that should at the very least point to an investigation on the news. Look for the people in power and you'll find the criminals.

  • @shermanr6

    WTC 7 was on the mass media plenty of times. who do you think put the footage on the news retard.

    why don't you guys talk about WTC 3? what are you truthers hiding about that collapse. LOL

  • We will have truth!!!!!!!!!!!

  • One little, two little, twenty little sheeple.

  • Its been ten yrs and nobody has proved that the buildings has come down other than by the planes. why than did they need the planes, why not just light a match to the termite, why be in involved in mass and i mean mass killing of all those people in the planes, whos conscience could hold that cause surly alot of people have had to be involved in this whole conspiracy and since than nobody broke, please no name calling if you think different than say so thanks

  • @1968bigcity

    Nobody has proven that the building came down via just planes either....

    This is the whole point, all NIST came to in its conclusion was theories. Some people are not willing to sit by, and watch thousands die because of a theory. Unfortunately its to late now to save the lives of the people who were killed in Afghanistan, and Iraq when we illegally invaded their country. However its not to late to stop it from happening again, we need to be SURE before we ever go to war.

  • @NeutralExistence Thanks for replying.

  • 1200 architects and engineers have concluded that tower 7 could not have fallen from fire alone. Source, Fox news, search for it.

  • @repawnd

    where are the 1200 articles on ae911 truth? Funny, how I only see them written by only 12 people that claim to be engineers.

  • @taledarkside

    Well the actual number is 1270, it's all there on BuildingWhat. Even the NIST investigators have had to admit to the freefall "theory" after being presented with the evidence. Its too late to deny, the truth is out.

  • @repawnd

    the truth is out that there is no air resistance?

    ae911 truth, telling lies by using grade school physics. ROFL

  • @taledarkside

    Uh? No, it's about proving that there were explosives. A building can not fall at freefall speed unless it's being pulled. Why? Because of resistance. That is REAL physics.

  • @repawnd

    nothing falls at free fall speed. that is real physics.

    keep getting brainwashed like a dope

  • @taledarkside

    lol

  • @repawnd

    "Free-falling objects do not encounter air resistance"

    oh look, a quote from a "REAL PHYSICS BOOK"

    learn to do real research instead of some guy that made several websites to make money

  • @taledarkside

    Ok, if you have to be so anal about it I will say it like this, a building cannot fall at the speed of freefall minus wind resistance without being pulled. Happy now?

  • @repawnd

    nope

    all objects fall with air resistance. wtc 7 didn't fall on the moon, which has no air resistance.

  • @taledarkside

    Yes, I have added air resistance to the equation. I will repeat it again, a building cannot fall at the speed of freefall MINUS AIR RESISTANCE without being pulled. Got it?

  • @repawnd

    nope

    all objects fall with air resistance

    a building that has demolition will not free fall.

  • @taledarkside

    I give up. I told you MINUS air resistance. Sorry I cant waste my time anymore, bye.

  • @repawnd

    so how are you alive if there is no air?

    sorry, you enjoy being brainwashed

  • @12Weasel

    "stupid piece of pig shit" ... "paranoid little fucking pieces of shit" ... "head up their assholes" ... "fucking idiots" ... "Retarded monkeys" ... "You piece of dog shit" ... blah blah blah

    If the official story of 9/11 were actually true you'd probably be able to, you know, actually list some facts to make your case... but instead you're just left sputtering pathetic insults. The scientific evidence overwhelming supports the hypothesis of explosive demolition. Grow up.

  • havn't seen so many stupid sheep ROFL

    oh look, the steel beams from the WTC. The ones that the truth movement never tested for explosives. Oh ya, and their lie about no steel beams existing.

    brainwashed idiots

  • @12Weasel Just to bad i didn't make this comment, but my mom did because this is my account..... so just chill a little please ^_^

  • @12Weasel, Why do you think that your government wouldn't lie to you? The government is made up of human beings. and it is a know fact that humans lie. Our government has been caught in so many lies from the Vietnam War, To the assassination of President Kennedy. Open your eyes the things that you find on the internet will never be shown on the national media, because the media is controlled. You see none of these protest are ever broadcast on the news ask yourself why?

  • 0:09 metal looks like cross God must be watching over ground zero

  • @12Weasel the only fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are people like you that beleave that are goverment had nothing to do with 911 you are too blind and to closed minded to look into the facts and really watch all the videos out there and read into the offical report has so many holes in it that it makes me sick so how about you read the offical report and then tell us what you think

  • but why do this when u guys know that the government doesnt give a shit about these protests ? go with your firearms and maybe they will shake a little.

  • a great video, my respects.

  • everyone in NYC and the surrounding areas should have been on the streets with this protest..surely they don't believe the lie known as the 9/11 Commission Report ? it is beyond belief that anyone with a brain would not see this is a massive coverup... with all the evidence now showing that the highest ranks of the government had a hand in 9/11

  • @xadam2dudex Except for those of us New Yorkers who actually saw the planes hit. And there is no evidence. None at all. Every single conspiracy theory has been throughly debunked and yet you "Truthers" insist on clinging despterately to your claims. It's your religion really. You're no different that some dupe who believes in an invisible person in the sky.

  • @captwasabi only those disinformation agents say there were no planes.. nobody who is serious about 9/11 thinks there were no planes... and I think it is u who are deluded by ignoring the evidence that has not been debunked in anyway..the people that put forth crazy ideas are there to be debunked so it will make everyone appear to be foolish as well..truth can not be denied I am sorry u r brainwashed

  • @xadam2dudex There is no evidence that has not been throughly debunked. There was no stand down order. Explosives were not used. It's all bullshit. You "Truthers" are just another cult of lunatics all claiming to be free of "the brainwashing" when it is you yourselves whom are the brainwashed. But do continue to post these videos and stand on our street corners. I do need someone to ridicule on a regular basis.

  • @captwasabi

    you said "Explosives were not used." but if you read the actual published research on the subject you will find:

    1) The only scientists to look for explosives, FOUND EXPLOSIVES in the remains!!

    2) Building 7's free fall collapse can ONLY be explained with explosives

    3) Plane impacts and fire are woefully insufficient to account for the bountiful physical and video evidence.

    4) The resulting debris pile showed EVERY criteria of high-order explosive damage, defined by NFPA 9219

  • @smitty121981 The only problem with this is thate very single one of your claims above have been throughly debunked. More over, the possibility of explosives is simply impossible when one looks at the massive scale of the operation. you're talking about having dozens of demolitions experts working over the entire building over the period of several months, removing finished walls, planting explosives, running detonation wires then covering up their work with finished walls. Really?

  • @captwasabi

    "every single one of your claims above have been thoroughly debunked." No, they are all backed by credible sources, and are NOT "debunked" by any source (can you find one?), and there is ample physical and video evidence that is NOT explained by the "plane and fires only" theory! All available evidence points to the explosive demolition of all 3 WTC buildings! The TV lies to you because it is paid for by global corporations, read the actual literature on the subject please.

  • @smitty121981 Absolutely not true. There are engineering organizations around the nation and around the world that fully support the plane-collision progated, fire-induced collapse. There is not one single reputable source that supports explosives. You are a sick, pathetic, delusional fucking moron who is taking their obvious distrust of government and total disdain for authority and forcing the facts to fit this pre-existing bias. Everysingle claim of the "truthers" have been debunked.

  • Life of Brian all over again

  • this aint going away mother fuckers!!!!! its been almost ten years now. you cant kill 3,000 inocent people and feed us a bullshit story and expect it to just go away. one way or another your going to fucking pay!!!!!!!

  • @chaosad09 Well, certainly looks like someone forgot to take their Ritalin.

  • Building 7. 'nuff said.

  • you are the front line, I salute you.

  • @timeaification

    thank you sir!

  • I find it most curious that in the comments section of each 911 video I watch, there are these (same?) people who troll around trying so hard to debunk the truth...you would think it was their job. It's interesting because I read an article recently about how the CIA could infiltrate social media forums like this one...how? by joining in the conversation subversively, attack and belittle the truthers to make them look crazy and unpopular,..but in truth we are sane and our numbers are growing.

  • and why are you talking only about the buildings ... there is a lot more shit going on that has not yet been answered .. not that i care, they never will be because if the government or whoever does not want you to find out .. your not .. period

  • omg you people are so dumb .. this was an inside job .. plains disappeared.. a plain crashes into the ground and vanishes lol ok ... and yes if the us government wanted to sneak bombs into a building they can .. they can do w.e they please, thats how they got people to believe all there silly stories yet they still have no answer to the questions that should have been answered by now. and tower 7 came down just like 1 and 2 yet no other building that was also on fire did??? yeah

  • (cont. from my last post) And not only that, but none of the hundreds of people behind the conspiracy have ever broken their silence - not once in ten years.

    That's extraordinary. Truthers are batshit crazy. You have thrown common sense out the window. You reject logic as a whole and turn what's left into something that props up your delusions. No matter what angle a sane person approaches this from they couldn't possibly draw the conlcusion that 911 was an inside job. This is just bizarre.

  • @GrimJackal your name suits you well you punk ass homosexual traitor! ONLY a freak like you would make such a mental-case remark. Lets see you eat your words read ALL OF dollarpages [] org and then run like the cockroach that you are, over the last few months, this movement has exploded!!! More people are on board than ever!!! more have come on board in the last few months than in all the years combined!!! that's a TOTAL FACT!!! the time of reconing is near, ancient Christianity has it that a..

  • Comment removed

  • So let me get this straight. Hundreds of pounds of explosives were snuck into these three buildings and placed in key areas to cause structural collapse - a job which would have required doens if not hundreds of people to complete - and not only did security never catch them at it, but the thousands of people working in these buildings also failed to find this suspicious (even after thebuildings came down).

  • @GrimJackal what a moron, there were powerdowns, empty floors, people runing around suposedly upgrading the internet... the list goes on and on including the seizmic recordings at the nearby universities, when the underground bombs went off before the missile hit. if you are truly interested in truth, then watch evry vid on the 911 page at DOLLARPAGES [] ORG its going viral

  • Penn & Teller calls BS on your conspirasy...

    But of course they are on the government payroll... :P

    To be honest though there was a conspiracy against US...planed by terrorist who wanted to strike fear in the heart of the west. Just imagine how sinister and careful their planing was why do you search for "truths" when in front of your eyes you already have one.

  • There is a lot of talk around steel frames and why did collapse. Well yes the steel frame doesn't liquefy by the temperature produced by Jet fuel fire. BUT it doesn't need to turn into molten lava to take down the building. What people fail to see is that by heating the steel frame you actually dramatically reduce the stability and the weight it can hold. That's because heated matter ANY matter is more elastic more bendable if you like than cold matter.

  • @Locris86 sorry you must be a child, umm, plenty of 911 montages out there that include footage of several buildings burning for over twenty hours, the whole thing in flames and nothing happened structurally. SHILL also pools of molten steel that kept burning and were viewable by google satelite for weeks, are retarded?

  • @vhsjvc So I am a child because I know basic physics?

    You are a religion and I don't like people spreading nonsense in my face. For you ppl their is always something under the true story ALLWAYS, moon landing, JFK assassination, 9/11, aliens damn guys we all live in the same world you think I don't like the truth? My life is the Truth but I'm not trying to fabricate my version of "truth" because that's not scientific...it's Dogma

  • Why would a group fly planes into bldgs at 9am to kill the max number of people, then wait 90 minutes for everybody to evacuate before blowing the bldgs, but blow them before the fireman could get out? Are you trying to kill people or not? And if you are trying to start war with Iraq or Afghanistan, why identify the attackers as Saudi? Why take the trouble to set up a controlled demolition to spare surrounding buildings? Why not just put a some bombs in the basement? The whole thing is moronic.

  • @frank3373 err maybe to blame it on muslim extremists and blame it on fires burning and melting the steel, because that is exactly their cover story, open your eyes, you have been lied to.

  • @frank3373 to give time for the thermate to cut through the 47 vertical Steel beams then set off the other explosives that blew the cement Into dust there was too much dust for It to be just a skyscraper collapsing.

  • This is 1 of my favorite vids from 9/11/09. I was there all 3 days & it wound up being 1 of the best weekends of my life. It's an experience that I'll never 4get. Thanx smitty 4 posting this up. I can't help but feel the love, power, truth & intensity by watching it. Also thanx 2 We Are Change 4 organizing the events. It's such an amazing feeling 2 see & be around truthers everywhere coming 2gether 4 an important cause. The truth on 9/11's gettin bigger w/each passing day. Thanx WAC & smitty!

  • @97dieu

    Thanks so much for the support!

  • @97dieu

    Were you there last year as well?

  • @97dieu Hi 97, truly an inspirational video. I'm an old guy of 67. It is reasuring to see young folks like you and the others in this vid working their asses off for 9/11 truth. U all have undertaken a most difficult task. The powers behind this CRIME cross all stratum of our corrupt soiciety.Those bastards MUST keep a lid on this horror or they will perish.I consider you, and all the other young people working for 9/11 truth heros of the highest order.God bless you guys.

  • @97dieu Hi, are people planning on doing similiar demonstration in 2011 ?? 10 year anniversary is coming up... create a facebook page , set a date and a time and lets get 500,000 ++++ on this at least !!!!

  • @heightboosting Yes there are plans already for the 10th anniversary of 9/11 at NYC. There were already plans almost immediately after 9/11/10 (which I was there for) following a Facebook page. School will dictate how many days I can attend but I'll be there no matter what. The Facebook link is below for more info on what's going on this September. Of course more info will be posted as we get closer to the anniversary.

  • OK. Youtube won't let me post the link up on that page. It's called "Tenth Anniversary of 9/11 in NYC" on Facebook. Do a search on it and it should come up. :)

  • I do support a new investigation though...just for different reasons. I also think there was things covered up, but once again...for different reasons.

  • I know it is not a volcano, but the point was to show hot ash can still stoke and start a fire.

    As for putting CONTROLLED in all caps. I know what a controlled demolishion is. I have been to a few (Miss my 3 River Stadium). Part of the original theory is that there were explosives under the tower. That would have cause a bottom-up collapse. Unfortunately, it was top-down. If you watch building 7 collapse, it shows it giving way where there is a hole and then going top-down also.

  • ...Condelesa Rice admitted to Congress that Bush was given a memo weeks before 9/11 stating Al Queda planned to attack on 9/11. What should be investigated is whether Bush knew, thought it was credible, and still let it happen OR whether he found out, didn't think it was credible, and thus did not heighten awareness. That is the thing that SHOULD be looked in to and investigated.

    Oh and the Roman city that was set fire to by heated ash was Pompeii from Mt. Vesuvius.

  • @smitty121981 Actually, if I can clarify somethings. 1) Heated ash can set fire and thus collapse buildings and structures (See Mt St. Helens and the ancient Roman Empire). 2) There is video of the fire and Building 7 smoking. 3) A planned explosion going from the bottom up, where as the collapse of the buildings went from the top down (to where the hole was).

    I will say that it is strange what happened. I do believe Bush had knowledge that we were going to be attacked since ....

  • Comment removed

  • @Beambastic

    1) the WTC is not an ancient Roman building, and it was not hit by a volcano! There is only precedent for 2 mechanisms causing the global collapse of a steel-framed tall building (fire's not one of them): earthquakes and demolition. There definitely wasn't an earthquake and earthquakes always leave some piece of the building in tact!

    2) yeah, SO? That doesn't mean fire caused the collapse

    3) it's CONTROLLED demolition, so they can control where it starts from

    watch?v=c5iFW89tw2k

  • @smitty121981 You're gullible. You'll believe anything anybody tells you.

  • @smitty121981 "Do you realize that there is ZERO physical evidence that Building 7 fell from fires?"

    There is lots of video and photo evidence that it was fires.

    There is no video and photo evidence that it was explosives and there is also ZERO physical evidence that it was explosives.

    At the end of the day explosives are far less plausible than fires but you choose to believe that as being the cause.

  • Thank God we have all these flunkies that do nothing except smoke dope and sit around on the internet to save America from the NWO.

  • That is great. What a moving video, I am in.

    No more wars for Israel.

  • @talItatguy Ahhh, the clones come out to defend a defenseless point. I love it.

  • Its only a matter of time until that scumbag bush and his tyrannical friends will be dragged into court.

  • im very confused

  • Most obecjtions to 9/11 truth rest on the assumption that the American establishment could not possibly be so evil. But they now torture people, hold them without trial, wiretap without legal warrant, they now have such total disregard for the rule of law what with their criminal wars in iraq and afghanistan that their evil is proven, and all that remains to prove 9/11 truth are the laws of physics and structural engineering, as seen by A&E for 9/11 truth

  • everything points to the truth that 9/11 was some kind ofinside job: the laws of physics; the project for an american century needing the pearl harbour event to get going , and then 9/11 happens; and the criminal rampage of the american establishment since 9/11.

    you MUST stop the American establishment. the survival of the world depends on this, for they are mad enough and armed enough to drag us all down into mass destruction

  • Great post, good to see we still have hope. thank you and peace.

  • Great post, good to see we still have hope. thank you and peace.

  • @911Infowarrior It' seems funny that the black people can gather a million blacks for the million man march but for this looks like less than a thousand why is that?Lets get a million blacks and a million whites to march together then after the truth comes out we can go back to the good old fashion race wars lol But for this one everyone needs to stick together or we are fucked.

  • It's scary thinking about just how ignorant the people in this video are

  • I don't know how I never saw this one before, I thought i had seen most of these '09 NYC videos. I'm even in this one. haha.

    Very VERY powerful. Heart wrenching.  Much love and respect!

  • @911Infowarrior

    thanks! much appreciated

  • @911Infowarrior If shit hits the fan their are millions of Canadians to back you up. Thats a fucken promise!

  • I LOVE YOU GUYS F@@K THE ILLUMINATI PUPPETS TO HELL YOU GO

  • KEEP DOIN IT GUYS WISH I WAS THERE WITH YA

  • This is awesome I really wish I could be with these people maybe one day if I will plan a trip to NYC so I can be apart of this great movement I really wish I could be there every year.

    Can't wait to see the 2010 protest videos.

    The truth MUST come out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @djsdojo You have a whole year to save and plan to go to New York. Why not go there and protest yourself to support the truth? That seems like the best way to do it. Plan it out, save for it, then go!

  • ty!

  • 911 was not made by muslims

    911 was not made by americans

    911 was not made by other groups expect for one

    911 was a israeli job...and they did it with theyr israeli newsmedia in usa.. and if you ask me, free masons was also involved but again not the sheeple masons of america..but the false jewish people called Ashkenazim(russian warpeople) according to the speach of Benjamin Freedman in 1962..he warned mankind for this people

  • @sunnahproduction "911 was not made my muslims" Okay, where is your evidence on this? "911 was not made by americans" Okay, where is your evidence? "911 was a israeli job" Okay, where is your evidence??

  • @jazzfan5000 what a foolish way to argument but i will answer you knowing that you are to brainwashed to understand this giant hoax.. search for September Clues... do not watch 3-4 min and then give me an argument.. watch the serie.. and i want u to have this in your mind.

    No aluminium airplane can penetrate a steel building with concrete floors and walls no matter of speed... impossible.. and we are told that from the tip of the wings there were 8 floors of impact and the nose came out???!!!

  • I find it refreshing that today, in this day and age of wars of aggression, outright anti American legislation, blatant abuse of the basic civil rights of the American people, that our young and young at heart, can still show the passion for truth that has been lost in our world and country! WE ARE CHANGE! Yes, they are change. these are the people who are waking up the older generation to what is really being, and has been done to us. ASK QUESTIONS. DEMAND ANSWERS!!!!!

  • Keep going people, keep going!! The rats are leaving the sinking ship, the truth WILL OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • It's beautiful to see the young people of America show passionate about finding the truth. It's nice to see that this country has a glimmer of hope.

  • **All Truthers Read: Your theories have all been proven wrong. Don’t even try to say that they have not. Your cause is not respected. You are a part of a dead movement. The general population thinks you are all a bunch of nutcases. There will never be another investigation because there is no need for one. Break out of this stupid borderline cult and spare yourself the humility.

  • @ConsTheoristsRIdiots

    "Your theories have all been proven wrong" REALLY?? REALLY?? What about the nano-thermite found throughout the dust?!? That finding was published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal more than a year ago, and is NOT refuted by ANY reputable source including NIST, who refused to test for energetic materials during their "investigation". (blogs and forums don't count as reputable, so don't even try it!!)

    Want another??

    - the free fall of Building 7 is a PROVEN FACT.

  • @tristimulus "Nano-thermite... bla bla bla" Already proven wrong several thousand times!

    "peer-reviewed scientific journal" Which actually WAS NOT peer reviewed. Peer review involved more than just the authors of a research paper reviewing their own paper. This paper would have to be submitted to an organization of scientists, which it wasn't, and they would have to review the material and do their own research on the subject matter as well. That didn't happen with the Journal of 9.11 Studies!

  • @jazzfan5000

    the paper titled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" was published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal, went through months of rigorous peer review, and covers the clear and convincing evidence of nano-thermite in the WTC dust.

    you said, referring to the free-fall of Building 7, "where has this been proven?" Even NIST has confirmed this very simple observation, it is no longer up for debate. Look it up.

  • @tristimulus ...and Open Chemical Physics Journal was the only way they could get their paper published!! Why? Because any real publisher would have turned this paper away, and Steven Jones, Neils Herrit, et al knew this!! The way to get your paper published on the Bentham Open Journal is to pay them the money and tell them who reviewed the paper and you're pretty much done! That's not proper peer review! A typical process involves many people giving their expertise into the research!

  • @jazzfan5000

    "any real publisher" yeah smart guy, Bentham IS a real publisher. Here's a list of Nobel Laureates who have endorsed Betham: bentham. org/nobel

    They have *just a little* more clout than you. I think I'll trust their opinion over yours any day. They rest of your post about the peer review is just shit you made up and not even worth dignifying with a response.

  • @tristimulus "Nobel Laureates" ?? So what! I could write a paper saying how the sky isn't blue and get my paper published on Bentham only because I paid the publishing fee and provided a list of names! Just because a bunch of laureates endorse this site doesn't mean they're reading every piece of nonsense that Bentham has published! And just because someone has some "clout" or "respect" has nothing to do with writing a research paper about some mysterious fairy dust found at the WTC!!

  • @jazzfan5000

    The paper went through months of vigorous peer review (done anonymously, as is common) and this required additional experiments and changes to the paper. As a result of the long process the paper has remained water tight and NO ONE has found a valid flaw after more than a year!

    The data is clear: nano-thermite was scattered throughout the WTC dust and the ONLY possible explanation for this is controlled demolition!!

    you don't understand free fall, please read NIST

  • @tristimulus So wasn't it both Steve Jones and Richard Gage who both said that the evidence of nano-thermite was "unignited"??

    Ummmm, you can't have UNIGNITED thermite. If it goes off, it burns off! Amazing that Gage (who is NOT an explosives expert by the way and neither is Steven Jones) would say that a material like this is unignited!!!

    Anyway, I keep telling you how the paper got published yet you keep bringing up peer review. I will say it again... This paper WAS NOT peer reviewed!!

  • @tristimulus I don't need to read the NIST report, you do! I know enough people who actually performed the peer review on the NIST report who have been able to explain to me how bogus the truther reaction is to their report! I have done enough of my own research to know that the Truth Movement is not only a movement of stupidity but you people bring up issues that aren't even arguments or even ask legitimate questions. More than that, you're spitting on the graves of the fallen!

  • @jazzfan5000

    "you can't have UNIGNITED thermite." wow OK... what do you call thermite that hasn't been ignited yet?

    "This paper WAS NOT peer reviewed!!" *yawn* a blatant lie based on nothing

    "I don't need to read the NIST report" well, enjoy your ignorance then. The visible portion of the building fell as a single unit in free fall, this was shown to NIST during the public peer review by a member of Architect and Engineers for 911 Truth and then confirmed by NIST in their final report.

  • @tristimulus Dude, do you even realize that two jets slammed into both towers of the World Trade Center?? Did that thought ever cross your mind??

    Why would the NIST report make such ludicrous claims that the WTC 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition?

  • @jazzfan5000

    "Why would the NIST report make such ludicrous claims that the WTC 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition?" uh... I don't know, I never said they did

  • @tristimulus But you are claiming the building fell at free fall speed. Why else would you make this claim other than suggesting controlled demolition?

  • @jazzfan5000 you are correct to make the connection between freefall and controlled demolition. NIST failed to give a mechanism that would allow freefall in their fire-induced collapse model.

    As far as the nano-thermite paper goes - it takes real class to be totally wrong and then still act like you were right all along! Face it, you've got NOTHING to counter the damning evidence found in "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe."

  • @tristimulus "it takes real class to be totally wrong" Where was a I wrong? You have yet to determine where I was wrong!

  • @jazzfan5000 Why is it you must pre approve those whom wish to comment on your channel? I freely and openly allow any and all to post without pre approval on my channel. I only remove those containing racial slurs, hate speech, and deragatory language. I allow it to stay for 12 hours then delete. YOU, are a hypocrite!

  • @talltatguy No, you're a hypocrite! Don't worry about my channel! I can do whatever I want with my own channel. YouTube lets me, so I do it!

    Keep the conversation here!

  • @jazzfan5000 I was just saying, it is censorship and the first tool of the close minded. So what if some nut posts something derogatory, delete it later. I was just saying.

  • @talltatguy But it's not censorship if I am deleting messages on MY OWN Youtube profile!

  • @jazzfan5000 Considering that even half a second of, "free fall", is an indication of total, instant failure, of every structural support, across the entire building, cannot be accounted for by fire, and can only be intentional demolition, I would say that is about the jist of it!

  • @talltatguy But there was more than just fire! There was structural damage to take into account as well. This building was not stable. Thus the reason it collapsed.

  • @jazzfan5000 No amount of damage, or fire, can account for any time of free fall period. In order for free fall to occur, there must be absolutely no vertical, or horizontal load support. Fire and damage can not explain how this building fell.

  • @talltatguy And once again, WTC7 did not fall at free fall! How many times do you need this repeated?

  • @jazzfan5000 If you are still at the point in the debate where you are trying to deny that Bldg 7 did not achieve free fall speed during it's collapse, then you are far behind the facts that have actually been proven and come to light. Even lead engineers at NIST had to admit to free fall during the collapse of Bldg 7. So if they concede free fall, then their fire and damage theory is the conspiracy theory!

  • @talltatguy "Even lead engineers at NIST had to admit to free fall... bla bla bla" Okay then, who are these lead engineers?

    "fire and damage theory is the conspiracy theory" Look, if you cannot figure out basic engineering and the basic building blocks of a high rise office building - that's your own fault! Maybe you need to go back to nursery school to figure this out then? Hmmm? Maybe??

  • @jazzfan5000 Mr Shyam Sunder, from NIST, admitted the free fall of at least 8 floors if not more! Basic engineering and over 100 years of steel frame construction has shown us that high rise office buildings have never collapsed due to fire and damage. Also, NIST claim that the column 80 support, and 1 side of a four sided truss system gave way under immense heat and damage. Even if these were the case, there were perimeter columns as well as the main skeletal structure to support the bldg!

  • @talltatguy Doesn't matter what is told to you about how the building fell, you're not going to believe it anyway. And just to let you know, this is not about what you believe. It's really not open for debate. What happened, happened! Simple as that!

  • @jazzfan5000 Not when simple physics tells me that NIST presented a very false and error riddled explanation!