Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • catsmerge: Whether there is a right to privacy differs in each particular situation. In that situation, there was a need for prior consent. The media also has to get consent and if they don't, they can't film. So call me a moron. You have no reasoned argument, and name-calling is the best you have. Go to law school or get a lawyer.

  • Manyon R: Truth to whom? All religion is belief. Your "truth" might not be "truth" to someone else. All religion is bases on belief. Do you understand the word "dialogue"? In an interfaith dialogue, people of different religions are meant to CONVERSE, respectfully, about their own religion's views on a particular topic. You can't stand behind the Constitution to make hate speech. Check out the Supreme Court cases.

  • Its NOT illegal to film you ignorant fools. If that were the case all news media would be in jail. Stop your whining.

  • Those who left the building did so because they wouldn't tolerate the illegal filming of the meeting. As an attorney, I can tell you that filming that meeting would LEGALLY REQUIRE PRIOR CONSENT OF ALL ATTENDEES. I think everyone there had a reasonable expectation that their meeting (and some select names) would not show up, without their permission, on YouTube! The U of Miami man was spot on about how inappropriate it was to disrespect others' religious views.

  • @belltower2012 If it is in a public tax payer building which was expressed then there should be no expectation of privacy. An interfaith meeting with an open forum as also was expressed would not have expectation of privacy. No prior consent necessary in this scenario.

  • @belltower2012 [[The U of Miami man was spot on about how inappropriate it was to disrespect others' religious views. ]] The truth is at many times offensive. So if truth is to be expressed it is no ones burden if someone else might be offended. In fact the Supreme court ruled that hecklers do not have veto power on someones free speech.

  • Film exposes lies...sex lies and video tape

  • Spot on Mark, AGAIN

  • Way to stand your ground! Points were made. Usama is a blessing.

  • It is because, in this case, Imam Sykes and Rev. Fulwider could not decieve Usama Dakdok. Rather than having a dialogue to discuss their differences. Imam Sykes and Rev. Fulwider decided to leave the Interfaith Dialogue.

    In my opinion, it was an embarrassing display of disingenuousness, bad manners, and fear was on display for all to see.

  • why do muslims never want to be filmed is it because they got something to hide

  • i wish the black would shut up

  • It's a problem because they don't like it when someone else has some power...

  • Fantastic job gentlemen, way to stand your ground. A gem was produced from your perseverance. G-d bless.

  • @smredneck0 That's what I said.

  • islam is a vile death cult

  • AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH­AHAHAHAHAH.................... WHAT A MESS!!

  • LOL!! "Interfaith dialogue................?" 

  • @smredneck0 Yup. Only difference is Allah is a false god. Same Bedouin moon god, same false god since before the ancient Egyptians ruled and flourished. Key is the crescent moon symbol. It's even mentioned in Judges.

  • Deedat has seen and lived through the persecution of Christians in Eygpt and though he might get passionate about bringing the truth out about how muslims treat Christians in his homeland. If I was him I would be even less restrained with my anger. For some people the truth is something to run from or threaten but I would never let anyone bully me out of speaking the truth

    AMEN

  • @smredneck0

    Um, excuse me but a-rabs r not a race. They r a mixture of people, mostly dark I agree, but they r actually considered CAUCASIAN. Yes there r lots of Black "arabs" but they r more a case of "arabized" people. As r i.e. Lebanese.

    There r only really 4 "races" of people; Caucasians, Mongoloid, Australoid & Negroid.

    I agree with u, islam is wrong. It is a misogynistic hate filled death cult but the arab culture in general is full of hate. And I know not all arabs are islamic.

  • you want interfaith dialogue then get Dr. Zakir naik.

  • @razaa09

    I would love that show man Zakir Naik to dialogue with then ask him to go through his little "Let`s rip apart the Bible verses" routine then I would question him on every misquote and mistranslation he makes leaving him looking like the fool that he is.

  • @FeignofCordor haha ok there bud! he memorized the whole Bible, The Torah, The Quran and the Hadiths. So keep dreaming! lol

  • @smredneck0

    My distaste for arabs is based on experience and from what I see on a regular basis. I don't blame them personally; it is just their culture. Not all r bad I know but as a group they r rather miserable people.

    I'm not a racist; side when r arabs a race?

    It is not a rediculous principle; it is a Judaeo-Chritian saying & makes sense. It basically means quit looking for God to solve your petty problems.

    Mazel tov, you know arabic. I'm happy for you. It has nothing to do with this.

  • @smredneck0

    Further, the black dude was pissed of at the arab cuz the arab was dising somebody about their religion. THAT is not dialog! I have a lot of respect for what the black guy said. He refused to allow the arab to start taking religion just like he would not allow the other dude to request a prayer. He rightly pointed out the session was for dialog not religion per se.

    PS as far as I am concerned, I don't to trust arabs, muslim or Christian. Their culture is false, a culture of lies.

  • Comment removed

  • This had NOTHING about dialog in it. It turned into a rah rah for Christianity. How pathetic.

  • 1.Where do you come up with the comment that the disruptive guy that ticked with the camera guy, has ANYTHING against Christians?!?! His objection was about the filming on the meeting. I don't agree with him but YOU are lying about him.

    2.The arab at the beginning was extremely rude to dis the person that said God helps those that helps themselves. Who cares if it is in the Bible or not; it's a common Judaeo-Chrisitan expression.

  • Comment removed

  • One page exposes what ISLAM and Shariah law has done to several countries.

    GOOGLE: CAJeffO Muslim Experience

    ...... take the first result. Sometimes Google tries to show it as a broken link. On your 2nd attempt it shows up (LOL).

    Shariah Law is preached by Muslims.

    Allowing Shariah law is a death sentence to The Constitution & Bill of Rights.

  • Satan and god are both imaginary

  • I might add that one exhibits the fruit of one's Spirit, so the ones with God should be plainly obvious.

  • By rights, there should be no such thing as an interfaith dialog. You're either with God, or with Satan. There is no in between, no fence to sit on, and no bridging the gap. There IS no fellowship between light and darkness. Period.

  • The first 16 minutes of this video almost makes me ashamed to be a Christian.

    However, the ME guy with the shaved head and grey suit has his knowledge of Islam right on the mark.

  • @CAUGHTUPALIVE1 An Ex soviet KGB agent once said one of the goals of Marxism is to replace institutions with fake organization. There are a lot of fake (Marxist) Churches in the USA and they usually work with Islam.

  • No wonder we find it difficult to agree across the world !

  • Breathtaking

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more