AT&T has largest info archive on earth but is secret

[Yoetah]

I'm slippin' ...I was certain I "favorited" this one.

[tedhuntington]

Are we to believe they never record the stuff on their wires? Then move on the the possibility of hidden cameras - at least for FBI - we know they do - well where are the videos? We as taxpayers own them but can't see them?

[Yoetah]

"We as taxpayers own them but can't see them?"

Why are we settling for "no?"

NO isn't an alternative any longer.

[Yoetah]

We will believe whatever bullshit that we're fed anymore...no problem...they mock us....they laugh at us!

[tedhuntington]

Looking at this vid in an updated light, I think that I would focus less on people's last thoughts, and just build the case slowly - in a way that is not too shocking or too far a space to bridge - start with the telegraph, and storing telegrams, then phone calls, the phone company recording all or important phone calls, ...well where are these recordings?

[Yoetah]

"...in a way that is not too shocking or too far a space to bridge - start with the telegraph, and storing telegrams, then phone calls, the phone company recording all or important phone calls, ...well where are these recordings?"

We're too dumbed-down by years of being bombarded w/incoming data, that our brains are storing, to imagine that our immediate future is already "the past" for the powers that be.

Our brains are literally being burned out by all the "waves."

[Yoetah]

Now I know I rated this video...and I know Jack rated it and I know another who rated it

Is the rate feature disabled.

Is the view count sttttuuuckkkkkk?

[Yoetah]

Hehehe,

there we go...

[Yoetah]

5*****

[wonOnbi]

Bill Cooper was murdered? Why?

What is that he was exposing EbE cover-ups?

I don't think so.

He inspired many to defend America's Constitution-was that the reason? I have doubts about that too.

Cooper said: "technology released to the public is already 100 yrs old."

Is it possible Cooper "had gone too far this time?"

Btw, Cooper disclosed that in Stanley Kubrick's movie, 2001 Space Odyssey, HAL=IBM.

Who really knows why he was murdered - AT&T's data bank perhaps?

[QueenLaRayne]

Wait, I don't understand: how can a company like AT&T have this stuff? They didn't have chips in thier brains....? I'm confused...how could they know all of this stuff, I think I am thinking of the wrong AT&T?!?!?!? How could they possibly even get the information?

[tedhuntington]

Girl, how did you find my video?! This is one of my favorites. For years the telephone company, and before them the telegraph companies, have connected wires from people's houses to their buildings. And we are to believe that they never recorded the audio and images on those wires that they own? It's like saying I got a letter but I'm not going to open it. Then people in gov wanted to see inside houses of those suspected of being interesting or hot. So, the pc connected cameras to the lines.

[Yoetah]

Ted, are you aware of any portable devices that can detect and amplify inaudible radio frequencies as a way of monitoring "sound?"

Thanks

[tedhuntington]

a typical radio can decode FM and AM but there are other modulations like PCM - I can only imagine what info - mostly images and sounds is being sent around in photons.

[Yoetah]

Ted,

"I can only imagine what info - mostly images and sounds is being sent around in photons. "

Imagine the implication of what you just wrote.

It's HUGE!

[Yoetah]

"a typical radio can decode FM and AM"

Ted, what of our own radio receivers?

Do you believe there's much known regarding how our body receives, translates, stores, processes and transmits data.

[i now you do, just posing the question]

the sole existence for some of the esoteric schools was to keep this knowledge sacred and out of the hands of any who might exploit it.

Has that this very thing happened?

IS technology used to manipulate the mind of man?

[Yoetah]

"I swear upon the altar of God, eternal hostility to every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

What was Thomas Jefferson referring to?

[tedhuntington]

The key in my opinion, is not any kind of mystical or unknown phenomenon, although there must be many things through science which we will learn as we move into the future. The key in my view is that the experimenters in science and then the phone company developed cameras that can see and hear thought, and in addition a method, like Galvani, to remotely move muscles, but unlike Galvani in 1791, to move muscles without having to touch the nerve, by directly stimulating neurons.

[Yoetah]

I suspect,anyway,

the mystic would not have anything to do with using any force to spy on mankind...

what purpose would it serve them

it only serves the bastards who get their jollies peepin TOM

[tedhuntington]

It is interesting that the "TOM" as opposed to the "ATOM" theory, might theorize that since atoms can be divided, and perhaps even photons are made of smaller masses, that there is an infinite scale in magnification which never ends - and therefore strictly speaking, the literal interpretation of "atom" - as a mass which cannot be divided may be technically inaccurate - but these are things we probably never can know.

[Yoetah]

"It is interesting that the "TOM" as opposed to the "ATOM" theory...:

The first aum, the first A-TOM, the first Adam...

One can get luck free thinking and word associatiing.

Let's take "Darth Vader," just for the heck of it.

Does Darth Vader = dark matter - the mysterious force driving scientists looney as they dig deep to study it???

[setaynalac]

My aplologies by the way for getting your name incorrect.

[tedhuntington]

no worries, we are heading to a full free flow of info and its wonderful.

[QueenLaRayne]

Okay, but how would they know what people are thinking or seeing in thier brain?

Ps: Your video is on YouTube, not too hard to run accross :P

[tedhuntington]

all objects emit photons - light particles - its the heat signal of all matter -and using a diffraction grating, a single frequency can be viewed - and that is how people's eyes can be seen - what they see - but then the brain forms images of its own and they can be seen too.

[tedhuntington]

Seeing thought remotely is a good and scientific line of research. Yang Dan at Berkeley has made public progress, seeing the eyes of a cat...seeing what a cat sees.

[setaynalac]

As with all scientific theory, you can't really prove it to be correct, it's just a theory. Have you spent any time trying to disprove your theory? Shouldn't you and i be able to get together and go locate one of these devices that you have mentioned?

[tedhuntington]

There is compelling evidence that Thance Cesar killed RFK (the Noguchi autopsy), and so on. There have been leakers, Andre Maurois was one large leaker.

Put yourself in their position, if you lose the service by telling people, you won't tell. It's more addictive than cocaine, and people want to hear the thoughts and see their neighbors in their homes. Like auschwitz if they told, nobody would believe them and call them crazy.

[setaynalac]

Thanks Terry, interesting stuff.I certainly don't have a problem believing the technology is possible. The difficulty I have is the same I have with all secret theories, the keeping of the secret. If I had a problem in my life and told 10 people, I would expect it would leak outside of that circle. On average, how many people per year would you say it takes to pull of something of this magnitude?

[tedhuntington]

Ted is my name. Thanks for the info. This is a powerful argument...how could so many people keep such a secret. And it is tough to answer, and ultimately we need more physical evidence. David Griffin addresses this issue by saying: there are lots of secrets, the manhattan project was a large secret. Auschwitz was a large secret many people knew about but no media sources revealed. We know that Oswald didn't kill JFK.

[setaynalac]

How did you come to this conclusion? I have never heard this before. I'm not saying it is not possible, but what leads you here?

[tedhuntington]

Hi setaynalac, there is not a lot of evidence that has reached the public, but what there is of it, you can find on my web page if you search for "Ted Huntington". In 1937 the book "The THought Reading Machine" leaks some of the info. Maybe I'm wrong, but how hard is it to believe that AT&T simply records the audio on it's telephone lines? How hard is it to believe that Pupin or somebody figured out how to see thought in the infrared? If not, it's a good line of research to pursue anyway.

[TerryOlinger]

Most interesting!

[tedhuntington]

Thanks Terry. It sounds far fetched, and I have to guess to a certain extent, but yet I believe what I am saying is shocking and beyond belief, but is sadly true for the most part.

[tedhuntington]

Most people think, oh the phone company doesn't record the info on their wires! That would be dishonest! But I think that is a pretty large amount of trust that might be very very very ... not enought verys....misplaced.

[mt3355]

How did AT&T get this info?

[tedhuntington]

Hi mt3355. Alexander Bell's company started recording phone calls for extra money. People would pay them huge amounts of money. They then realized that using their wire infrastructure, they could easily put microphones in houses connected to the phone wires. This grew into video around 1900, and then into seeing thought (1910) hearing thought (1911) and sending images and sounds directly to brains (1912). And the rest is history as they say, although secret history of course.