Added: 2 years ago
From: SteelersProduction36
Views: 12,392
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Music is EXTREMELY distracting and only three catches. Make a video that has a lot more.

  • @lazerlazer there isnt anymore.......the Steelers won with defense because their offense was boring and sucked.

  • @duppydoopy Hey doopydopey,FYI a TEAM wins the Super Bowl. Not what part of an NFL team you wish to pick and choose so don't be such a sore loser. I'd like to know what team you're a fan of...... Hmmm?

  • @duppydoopy

    defense wins championships my friend.

  • I dont think that was swanns best catch in Sb 10. My vote goes to the sideline catch where he somehow gets both feet in when he catches the ball with his whole body out of bounds

  • how it should be: #3 Lynn swann catch #2 Santanio Holmes #3 Imacculate reception

  • I studied the immaculate reception a long time and the ball was a few inches off the ground when Franco took it in. No question about it. At a certain freeze frame you can clearly see it.

  • @tjrxk7 liar.

    

  • The 'imaculate Reception' was NOTHING More then A FLUKE PLAY, i mean Seriously how many times are we going to see that type of Play in the NFL? ONCE AND A LIFE TIME...IT WAS A FLUKE PLAY!

  • @SportsTroll why do you hate the steelers if you watch every vid

    

  • @SportsTroll i would agrre that it was a fluke but it doesnt change that they won six superbowls after its sport shit like that happen take the catch by the gaints guy in 07 like to see him do that twice. Plays like that happen its part of the game

  • SportsTroll Whats actually Fluke here, is the very idea your Chimp Brain manages to Knuckle out the replies you do----Here Shit4brains, time to eat shit--- 2 Weeks ago ESPN ran a 2 hour special on the Immac Reception. Their 75 million worth of Video equipment DISTINCTLY showed the ball hit Tatums RIGHT SHOULDER. They ran the play again and again, with Same Results. Nice try Shit4brains. LOL. You are OBVIOUSLY a JEALOUS MONKEY and i Love it. ROTFLMFAO!

  • FUCK SHITTSBURGH!!!!

  • @SportsTroll if you dont like the steelers then why do u watch this u troll?

  • @IHEARTxProductions Because SHITTSBURGH SUCKS!!!!!

  • thats he perfect song for this, but this video needs extended for the top 10, not limited to 3

  • were the best

  • The Steeler fan base is just pure awesome!

  • Go Steelers! Stairway to 7!

  • notice the pocket around big ben during the santonio catch...... who says our o line sux?

  • the REAL americas TEAM and im not saying that because of the 6 SB'S but because we always deserved that name and everyone in the world knows it!!!

    GO STEELERS!!!

  • we can argue over the order.....but i think you got the top 3 correct.....hey why not a top 10 ? this was great, but too short

  • @lpand45man  How about John Stallworth's 73 yd. TD catch against the L.A. Rams in Super Bowl XIV?

  • the holmes SB43 catch should have been #1 cause the other two are good but not as dramatic.

  • Yeah, there's no way the Immaculate Reception isn't no. 1. That catch was so improbable on many different levels. Plus it turned around the fortunes of the franchise.

    The Swann catch was nice, but it wasn't even the best one in that game. The leaping, contorting grab he made on the sideline was much more impressive.

  • how is the imaculate reception not number 1

  • the reason is that lynn swann was interfeerd and throw to the ground and he still caught the ball but francos catch was great but he had an easy go to catch it

  • @SteelersProduction36 Yes but lynns particular play didnt win the super bowl like franco harris's did,now did it

  • @RABandrew hey dumbasss yes lynn did win the superbowl francos catch was not a championship game.

  • ur a dumbass franco harris catch won them the afc championship game lynn swann catch help there second super bowl get ur facts straight

  • @bluegoalie2034 sorry dude,you are the one with the facts incorrect,Pgh lost to Miami 21-17 the week after the Immaculate Reception

  • @SteelersProduction36 because it was illegal and should be refered to as the Immaculate Chrsitmas Present from the referees............the ball touched Fuqua and then Franco.

  • doopyBrains-- 2 Weeks ago ESPN ran a 2 hour special on the Immac Reception. Their 75 million wort of Video equipment DISTINCTLY showed the ball hit Tatums RIGHT SHOULDER. They ran the play again and again, with SAME Results. Nice try Shit4brains. LOL. NOw go tell your Mommy its time to watch Capt Kangaroo. LOL

  • @SteelerGold1 you think I'm going to listen to what some dipshit like you says..some Steeler dope who thinks his team got the better of the Raiders in the 70's just because they got more rings..NEVER!! The Raiders were clearly the better franchise..won more games, had better players and played in the NFL's greatest games...I'm sure Tatums shoulder had an impact on the play, but Fuqua touched the ball with his hand reaching for the ball. Incomplete pass. Raiders won 7-6.

  • duppyTheChimp-- It takes a MONKEY 4 to get it Wrong on ALL Counts. 70's Steelers were Voted #1 team of the Decade. Furthermore, they were voted #1 Dynasty of all times. THEY HAD A RECORD OF 101 & 22 THROUGH THE ENTIRE 70'S DECADE.

    Who Voted? SPORTS ILLUSTRATED WRITERS, ESPN, ALONG WITH THE NFL CHANNEL, + A POLL OF THE FANS. How can my New Monkey verify this? A 2 PAGE ARTICLE IN THE JUNE 2010 EDITION OF SPORTS ILLUSTRATED, PAGES, 78 & 79

    better record than Raiders, Household name Players. LOL

  • duppy- No Monkey, not just an Impact by Tatum, the Video ESPN Showed on 75 Million worth of equipment showed CLEARLY & DISTINCTLY that the Ball Bounced off Tatums RIGHT SHOULDER. Hell, you dont even need to watch it on ESPN's millions of dollars worth of equipment, the one here on the Tube will do such fine. If you cant see it, you must be a Blind Monkey to. This is the part where you comeback with a Boat Load of EXCUSES, but rest assured Sir. Chimp, I will HUMILIATE the fucking shit out of u

  • duppyAss- PS: During the discussion by the 6 Panel of Pros on the ESPN Special, they NEVER once mentioned the Raiders. OHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHA

    NOT ONE FUCKIN TIME MONKEY BOY. LOL. Sure Monkey, your Raiders had better well known names than the 70's Steelers---TERRY BRADSHAW -- MEAN JOE GREENE --LYNN SWAN -- JOHN STALLWORTH -- MIKE WEBSTER-- JACK LAMBERT -- JACK HAM -- FRANCO HARRIS, ROCKY BLIER, ETC ETC. HALL OF FAME INDUCTEES, 14 FROM THAT TEAM ALONE---RAIDERS?? LOL OHHAHAHAHA

    NEED MORE?

  • @SteelerGold1 dude...you are wacked............take a deep breath.........you sound like you're hyper ventilating........I'll smash you down sometime soon, just got better things to do at the moment.........but its entertaining watching a loser Steeker fan freak out cuz he knows his team was a boring conservative sleeper compared to the Silver and Black.

  • duppyTard-- TRANSLATION: Mommy Mommy, Steeler Gold is Picking on me again. No matter what i try, he continues to Best me. What Izz i doin wrong Mommy Mommy? MOMMY: Well Chimp son of mine, have you ever stopped to thing he is INFINITELY MORE INTELLIGENT than you? What i'm saying Ape son of mine, is i have read both your posts, and you do have the Intelligence of a 3 yr old Chimp, instead of the 9 yr Chimp you are. DUPPYRETARD: I understand Mommy, but if i could only Win just Once against him. Sad

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more