e + pi

[ff7masta]

This is was terrible.

[link0zeldarulz89]

blah blah blah pythagorean theorem blah blah blah

[scoreunder]

This entire video and no e^(pi*i)?

[davidiscoolnotschool]

u gotta love math ^_^

[xXMoLtEnMaStAXx]

@davidiscoolnotschool UHHHHHH.. NOBODY LIKES MATH

[skoockum]

@xXMoLtEnMaStAXx Many, many people not only like math, but love it... but if you were to say that tards don't like math, or stoopit people don't like math,or the logically impaired don't like math -- well, I would be more inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt.

[hamsturinn]

the most important numbers in math are 0, 1, p, i, e

[hamsturinn]

the most imprtant numbers in math are 0, 1, p, i, e

[Nightweaverr]

poor beta :p

[anticorncob6]

I wish we knew whether e + pi was irrational or not. We're pretty sure it is, though. That will be my goal in life.

If you want to get rid of -1, it's better to divide him by zero then square root him!

[StickZer0]

@anticorncob6 But that would make him infinitely powerful! D:

[evanescence9314]

@anticorncob6 e and pi are both irrational, so I guess their sum must be irrational, too. You can't divide -1 by zero. the sum of e and pi, according to my calc is 5.859874482.

[aleinen66]

@evanescence9314 e didn't divide -1 by zero, she said she square-rooted -1, which is i

[jblocki]

@evanescence9314 Not true! Pi +1/2 is irrational and so is 1-Pi, but (Pi+1/2)+(1-Pi) = 3/2 is rational.

[vampiracy]

@jblocki

I think that what they meant (though it was horribly worded) is that any sum of two different transcendental numbers cannot equal a rational number. pi and -pi are both pi, but pi and e are not.

[jblocki]

@evanescence9314 Not true! Pi +1/2 is irrational and so is 1-Pi, but (Pi+1/2)+(1-Pi) = 3/2 is rational.

[anticorncob6]

@jblocki The simplest example that two irrationals sum to a rational is pi and -pi. Their sum is obvious and needs no paper and pencil. But yours,

(Pi + 1/2) + (1 -pi) = pi + 1/2 + 1 - pi = 1/2 + 1 = 3/2

It's still a good example, though.

[anticorncob6]

@evanescence9314 I guess I don't have to say it again, as many people showed that the sum of two irrationals might not be irrational.

But I guess the odds that pi + e is rational is infinitesimal. The amount of irrationals is more then the amount of rationals. By an infinite amount, in fact.

[cheatmasterbw]

It wasn't me, i did it

[cheatmasterbw]

sooo... do you like nature.

[Scp1966]

This is the best video i have ever seen with irrational numbers. Bravo, my friend.

[carmium]

Well, this makes about as much sense for me as calculus did... 8-\

[madatz2010rox]

hehe, that was awesome!

[mohaskib]

i is so old its all about j now

[TheRapperoni]

technically pi is irrational too

[Yetaxa]

I didnt do it, i did it!

[Mittarimato]

The only problem is that in different countries "^" means different things. It's funny that the guys arguing are all correct but they don't understand their operators.

[anticorncob6]

I always happen to see a math youtube video, then visit the person's channel, and it turns out they only have one math video.

[bigoli1]

Don't listen to him; He's greek!

[xFaIIenAngel]

LOLOLLOOLOLOLOLOL

[iwantcoolname]

what's beta star?

[sneezesneeze1f]

Lol, just wish they would have integrated e^(i*pi) somehow...

[willupton0987]

i dont apretiate being rounded to the nearest 10

[mdma4life]

Don't listen to him, he's greek LOL

[LightRP]

e divided by pi equals BOOOM.

[InvaderZim871]

i put an x in you i said e

[LETSMIXTHINGSUP2]

pi + e = pie

[LETSMIXTHINGSUP2]

it wasnt me 'i' did it lololol

[SolidSnyder]

Who are you talking to? xD

[hmodywakid]

e^(pi*i)+1=0 euler's equation

e^(i*x)=cisx

use taylor to proof it

[Parkjimin950521]

Interesting fact : e^pi+1 = 0

[calculusnoob]

No sir/ma'am.

[Parkjimin950521]

@calculusnoob e^(pi*i)+1 = 0

Sorry.

[Sebastian1011]

@Parkjimin950521

no it doesn't



[mducky6]

@Parkjimin950521

If by 0, you mean 24.14, then yes

[jv1701]

I laughed quite hard at this video and then realized and accepted that I am a nerd. If any one wants to learn more google or wikipedia Leonard Euler. He created E^i pi

[DANTE4891]

e π c!!!

[brohtworst5]

can some1 please tell me what the B* is my bro needs to know for his math and i dont know that 1 lol

[tidakada1965]

One doesn't need Calculus to understand this video! Just properties of the two transcendental numbers e and Pi. And other jargons like "pythagorean" or "fibonacci". And the square root of "negative one" (which mathematicians called imaginary).

[ericon52168]

i square-rooted you!!!

lol

[ritalogica]

it seam family guy voices!!!

[Nulono]

Someone explain the "maybe I should go" joke?

[sharperguy]

Ok, seriously now. Why the HELL did I laugh at "I love you-clidean plane geometry"?

I haven't laughed so much in ages and that joke wasn't even funny.

Also e^i*p = -1

[TheStormsTempest]

2.7182818284+3.141592653589793­=5.859874481989793

[bitchslapper12]

I can't wait until I learn Calculus so I can understand this video!

[Eorzean]

you don't need calculus to understand it! algebra and trigonometry would suffice.

[solacaMovies]

The e and π are numbers with never ending digits after the decimal point and "i" is the square root of any negative number! (But in this it's known as √-1) Hope this clears up any other questions!

[bitchslapper12]

Thanks that helped a lot! In which area do you use the "e" or that "B*" thing which they order the "food" from? Also could you tell me what "i" has to do with the real letter "e". Thanks for the help!

[HTFFanOfFlaky]

wrong. i is only thew square root of -1. the square root of other negative numbers are merely a number as a coefficient of i.

[Daniel15au]

i is just the square root of -1. Square root of -4 is 2i :P

[brohtworst5]

@Daniel15au its 4i lol not 2i

[Daniel15au]

@brohtworst5 The square root of 4 is 2. So the square root of -4 is 2i. 2i x 2i = -4.

[abcdef12330]

@Daniel15au you can't take the root out of a negative number...

[diomedes39]

@abcdef12330 Yes you can.

[crimmsonn1]

Most often you can't obtain a real number from a complex form (Ex: Principle: i^i=exp(-Pi/2), i+i=2i); but you may use the properties of the complex field to verify and solve equations (often differential). 'i' is a symbol that makes about as much sense as looking at sqrt(-1). Since the real field is defined as an ordered field of dedekin cuts it's easy to interpret values obtained. The complex field is neither ordered nor complete. The main importance of this field is the property that i^2=-1.

[randomlaughingman]

@crimmsonn1 - i is the sq. root of -1, what d'ya mean? it's a 90-degree shift.

originally heard of it reading kabalah books, then i find out @ uni it's used in modulation to space channels. which is where it comes in to torus-timeline-winding descriptions.

[sk8rdman]

@randomlaughingman -i=i^3 duh

[randomlaughingman]

@sk8rdman - What? You're saying minus i is the same as i to the power of 3? Or that i is the same as i to the power of 3? How the fuck is it?

[sk8rdman]

@randomlaughingman for some reason, it's not letting me respond...

[sk8rdman]

@randomlaughingman I tried to explain how -i = i^3, but for some reason, it won't let me post as a comment.

[randomlaughingman]

@sk8rdman - Bastards. Still though, I can't see how -i can ever be i raised to itself three times.

[sk8rdman]

@randomlaughingman wow, do you understand math at all? I said -i = i^3.

That's i times i times i, or i cubed. i = -1^(1/2) or sqrt(-1)

i cubed = i time i times i = -1^(1/2) times -1^(1/2) times i = -1^1 times i = -1i = -i

It's that simple. I had to write out "times" so it would let me post.

[randomlaughingman]

@sk8rdman - ^ means to the power-to scumbag fake piece of shit liar cunt multi-channels.

It's the same thing as what I wrote about it to you twice now cuntface.

minus i doesn't equal i ^ 3. Neither does plus i. You're a fukcing nutjob.

[sk8rdman]

@randomlaughingman -i=i^3

Look it up in any text book or math site. I know what I'm talking about.

[COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO]

@sk8rdman - moron, i = the square root of minus 1.

If i, or minus i that you keep fucking typing for some reason, is somehow the same as itself once it's been multiplied by itself or its successive products 3 times, then logically it follows that you could then do that same operation to it for infinity - and it still wouldn't change. So you may as well write even more fucktarded shit like -i = i^4 = i^5 & then claim it's in maths books. Yeah maybe you read an equation with an i in it.

[sk8rdman]

@COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO Seeing as you recognize that i equals the square root of -1, you'll understand that i^2 = -1

Surely you also know what i^2 times i equals i^3 which equals -1i or -i

Furthermore, i^4 = 1 as i^2 * i^2 = (-1)(-1) = 1

i^5 of course, is equal to i because this is simply i^4 * i or 1i

It's a cycle that continues into infinity, both ways.

i^0 = 1 and i^(-1) = -i and i^(-2) = -1 and i^(-3) = i and i^(-4) =1

If you can find any evidence to prove this false, I'd be happy to see it.

[COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO]

@sk8rdman - well obviously I fucking recognise that - I've had to tell you that, and you still are trying to act like you aren't the same stalker faggot pedo that is singularly obsessed with trying so very hard to appear cleverer than me.

Living your life in-relation to another, is all that's required to prove that you should just give up.

You are totally full of shit, for reasons previously outlined. If you believe otherwise, then explain how you can alter i only when it is i^4 then.

[COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO]

@sk8rdman - You'e that faggot that takes pride in talking shit to physics teachers (of which I am not) about red shift & red-green OXO eye tests. You told people at school and elsewhere I was Tesla, and I never said anything to you about that in my life.

Quote the post of mine here that you initially replied me about, cause I can't find it nor what it was a response to.

[COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO]

@sk8rdman - plus you fag liar pedo cult made sure your tarded comment didn't show up as having replied 'heidless'-etc-timebent, so you could make anyone reading here think you are correct as no correction of your latest bs would show.

You do realise that i is an irrational? The reason it's written as i is because the only fucking other way to write it is: 'the square root of minus one' - which is NOT a number, it's not even as easy to use as other irrationals, like pi and e and phi.

[sk8rdman]

@COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO i is not irrational, it's imaginary.

The only thing irrational about this conversation is you. I have no more time to waste on your insufferable ignorance.

[COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO]

@sk8rdman - your fucking notion that you aren't what I said you are, and that you don't exist soley to try to either be me, or that all your sad pathetic existence is in relation to me, is what is imaginary.

You did what your child-molester-cult always does when something I type elsewhere exposes your evil - you lookup something you think you can use to make me look wrong, and then you type loads of shit that makes no sense. And as with here - you can't even say what you replied to originally

[sk8rdman]

@COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO what does i^2 equal, hm?

[COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO]

@sk8rdman - it equals the demi-urge still has its hand up your arse, cunt. Go back to Planet Jewbag and report your failure to engage. Don't worry, they'll just make another one of you and it'll try the same shit again, as if there's some flaw or hole in the universe's logic that *one day* its one tactic will work in.

[Zahaele]

@COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO Uh... dude. Your strategy might be working on him, but everyone else here knows you're failing as a troll. So just stop now, and head back to Encyclopedia Dramatica.

[COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO]

@sk8rdman - faggot you changed the value of i to suit you -

"Furthermore, i^4 = 1 as i^2 * i^2 = (-1)(-1) = 1

i^5 of course, is equal to i because this is simply i^4 * i or 1i

"

After posting your pedo-cults usual harassment & abuse of me, using what I told you and repeating it back to me as if you didn't get the info off me in the first place as to i's value,

you changed i to be -1, when it's the SQUARE ROOT OF MINUS 1.

[COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO]

@sk8rdman - channel the demi-urge at me all you want scumbag, they'll just leave you the empty shell you already have to be to be a vessel for them in the first place, like all the other idiots it wore before you.

There's no stigma in being wrong about some factoid or whatever, but there's a big plenty of stigma being an annoying fag pedo like you, who tries to appear superior by copying textbooks, and can't even remember what lies they just typed to who they are obsessed with.

[COLONELKiNGUMERCURiO]

@sk8rdman - given you're the same idiot-group-mind as the tit4brains that think that the Monty Hall problem actually can apply in real life, and that axial spinning & orbits somehow have no connection at all to gravity, you got any other insane video comments you've been leaving here that I can also slag off?

[randomlaughingman]

@sk8rdman - I can see how with sacred geometry you would want to say that 1 = 3, but you wouldn't mix that up with maths notation and apply i to it, they're different things. The 1 = 3 is about how the point-line-circle(sphere) are the same thing but they are also 3 separate things, and it's about the Trinity and all that stuff. But the sq. root of minus 1 (which is i) isn't directly about that.

[sk8rdman]

@randomlaughingman I never said 1 = 3 I said -i = i^3. Neither -i nor i^3 equal 1 or 3.

[randomlaughingman]

@sk8rdman - did you look this up because of the Carl Sagan Agent Smith apple pie video from yesterdays commenting?

[sk8rdman]

@randomlaughingman I didn't look it up, it was just a suggested video and I thought it'd be interesting.

[nickcsd]

@bitchslapper12 Save for the one time they said the word "calculus", there isn't a single calculus topic in the video.

[GlorifiedTruth]

@nickcsd - Well, there's one implied at the end although not stated. A famous identity from Calc is "Euler's Identity," or e raised to the power of (pi)(i) equals -1. So we can credit it for that--if we're feeling generous, anyway!

[nickcsd]

@GlorifiedTruth I really wouldn't even call Euler's identity calculus. The only aspect of it that comes close to calculus is the fact that it uses limits, which is almost unanimously accepted as a precalculus topic.

[GlorifiedTruth]

@nickcsd - I recently learned it as part of a Taylor-series expansion chapter, but now that you mention it, it was just kind of thrown in there and seems as if it had already been derived.

[ohmyfsm]

@bitchslapper12 e is the limit of (1+1/n)^n when n tends to infinite. It's an irrational number, like PI, meaning they cannot be expressed as a fraction ( ration ) hence they belong to R-Q. PI is the ration between the circumference and the diameter of any circle. That is PI = C/d. i is an imaginary or complex number. That is any number that validates i^2 = -1.

[skoockum]

@ohmyfsm wait a sec, I thought e was the limit of (1+n)^(1/n) when n snuggles up to zero

[theimaginarynumber]

My little-known brother, -i, should also have appeared!

[woof244]

It's not called 'e', it's called Napiers constant or sometimes called Euler's number

[jtiza]

Because every REAL mathematician always says Napier's Constant and never abbreviates it by just calling it "e."

[rubicscube007]

it should have ended with i forcing pi to multiply and raise e to the pi*i. well that would be fuun. lol.

[babcockdc]

This is the best video on YouTube.

[Interrobang3]

Major LOL

[gautiergiuliani]

e + pi = Pie

[fr3d420]

I love Eu-clidian plane geometry

[slackertwentytwo]

I could go for some e right now.

[FlorPerezLascano]

So, may be there is an irrational pi, but how can we be certain that the circumference divided by it's diameter is that same irrational number? Couldn't it be that pi is rational but all methods to calculate it are prone to give us irrationals? Please reply if you can explain this... I'm dying to know!!

[magikspiffy]

Well, it would mean that either the diameter or the circumference or both are irrationals.

You an calculate pi by a famous succession as well.

[fistelsork]

You sound confused. The ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter does not depend on the particular circle you are looking at. This ratio is commonly denoted by the greek letter pi. It can be shown that this number can not be written as an integer divided by another integer. If you would like to understand this fact completely, you have to at least take a course in one-variable calculus.

[FlorPerezLascano]

Afterwards I read different ways of calculating pi but of all of them tend to find an irrational. So I wonder: is pi really irrational or are the formulas just taking us there? I was told by an advanced maths student that Niven's demontration of pi's irrationality is not related at all to the circumference.

[FlorPerezLascano]

IF PI = CIRCUMFERENCE / DIAMETER, WHY IS PI IRRATIONAL?

(Hi, I'm a pianist who loves maths and I got major doubts about pi)

If pi is irrational, then the circumference or the diameter or both are irrational. But if I imagine the historic process by

which the concept pi was born, it's impossible to get an irrational pi by taking meassures of circumferences and diameters

at home (unless there are simple ways of getting irrational numbers when meassuring).

[FlorPerezLascano]

EXCELLENT!!!!!!!!!!!

[missochable718]

add a constant to this and this would be epic...

[GTrain220991]

It wasn't me I did it

[numbrain2go]

el................oh..........­............el

[Actoutlife]

LOL THIS ROCKS!!!!! Woohoo!!!

[yesyes561]

lol...

[thetechguy22]

MATH RULES!

[bakas21]

lol

[ChaosCalligraphy]

lol, thats so funny!! :D "Negative one? no! I... I square rooted you!" rofl

[Heliosx15005]

maybe I should go xDDDDDDDDDDDDD

best part...I guess most of you didn't get most of the jokes 'cause tht it's pretty advance xDDD

[d1drifter87]

i did it LOL

[PixlPianta]

I showed this to my teacher and six other kids in Ac Lab! Most of them only LOLed at the part when e and pi wouldn't stop laughing. I laughed at all the math jokes. I am a nerd.

[PixlPianta]

OMG that was hilarious!

LMAO!

[chipmonkfever123]

that was stupid

[brandnewcheese]

hehe

[rejoycement]

i was waitng for PIE cuz "pi" and "e" are on a date?

[ic4llshotgun]

Euler seems to be forgotten here :P

[avanty19]

lol yeah I'd have thrown in the e^(i Pi) to get that -1 back

Nice video

[ohbaby22222]

pie is elusive

[chinchillakisses]

lol thanks for posting this... made me laugh :)

[ktlskitkat314159]

this was great!

[P3KO6]

hahaha...this is great....

[Joecool7788]

hahaha. this was funny!

[xboxsucks101]

good video

"I didn't do it; 'i' did!"

[akgamer0615]

awesome.  I love this

[cridss]

I was waiting for Euler's equation but IT NEVER CAME

[milkythecat3221]

BEST...MATH...EVER!!!!!!

[mikzilla0]

where's episode two to prove e^(pi * i) = -1

I totally thought that's where the relationship was going :P

[madboy0212]

this is hilarious hahahaha great work!

[nicholaswright2006]

LOVE IT

didja know that e ^ (i*pi) = -1?

ooOOOOOoooo!

[yeahimsosexy]

brings the lols

[FLO0DER]

It's reminds me Futurama :))

[toiletloser]

this is probably like the coolest thing ever!

[HYPNoBRECKY]

Ha, ha, blind date plus math equals funny!!

[anotherninja6313]

haha "im not comfortable with you rounding me to the nearest 10th"

[about28]

Nice story! Especially cameo apperance of beta star as a restaurant server.

[guitarguy93]

Haha

I found that enjoyable

[marleyjay01]

too nerdy for my understanding

[RevalaraUchiha]

Um...I cant understand it either haha.

[griffjam]

i love you... i mean i love euclidean plane geometry

[recoveringcarnivore]

Why didn't the numbers have the same gender sounding voice? So much for consistency and rationality. gender = gender

[muthabroad]

B is gay :B

[JeyPeyy]

"Don't listen to him, he's greek!" xD OMG this was fun!

[Mozza314]

lol that is so funny!

[looloo121]

lol

[zejele]

Why is the Embree-Trefethen constant serving the equations?

[maksiiiskam2]

e's living is from being the base of natural lorarythm, which are useful and pi's is to trace circles which is an useful shape, but honnestly what use is the Embree-Trefethen constant? An approximate job with no demand. I guess in his situation I would find another job too.

[zejele]

Great Reply!

I couldn't go without LOL!

[marleyjay01]

lol

[gusboprice]

hahaha! :)

[whatwhatisaid]

^_^ hahaha

[Killbride]

Learn how to spell, then come and haunt me.

[Cousins1113]

Hey i only found that i didn't say it was true i am just trying to see if it worked and to prove the person that said that WRONG i didn't spell i just coppied it but yeah! i don't belive in that crap

[Killbride]

Well, obviously it doesn't. Nothing on the internet does. It's all a scam. Especially when you spam people here. Why not try sending it to yourself first?

[Killbride]

..And before there was internet, how did you get around it? Oh, right, 15 and know it all. Blonde to boot..well, that explains everything.

[Cousins1113]

whaT?

[oOlexiiOo]

hahaha shweet

[horrorscope07]

i don't feel comfortable with you rounding me to the nearest tenth

i'm totally going to say that now

"it wasn't me i did it!"

[baschti15]

nice video =)

[Addicted2PATD]

omg... thats all i can say! omg!

~KK~

[GeoDivine]

Hilarious.

[sciguy14]

haha...wow thats great. Where did u come up with this idea?