Rob Walton and supporters can't seem to discredit any film by Mr. Greenwald and Brave New Films, so they resort to misinformation and other odious strategies. Sam's Club 6625 management in San Fernando California, lied and kept the bonuses in 2005/2006. Americans who firmly support outsourcing of everything, please give them a first class ticket to the People's Republic of China and declare them Persona Non Grata when they try to visit the US.
It really bothers me that those poor mistreated Wal Mart employees aren't allowed to simply resign. It's tragic that Wal Mart came to them and forced them to accept employment.
@2c40r2it Greenwald is a liar, you liberal asshole. All of you liberal motherfuckers think that every big business should be unionized. And when a big corporation such as Wal*Mart refuse to unionize, you asshole liberals attack them. I got news for you liberal hacks Wal*Mart isn't going anywhere, because they are WAY TOO big to go down by you liberal motherfuckers. They only way they will fail if people will stop shopping there, and I don't see that happening anytime soon.
Thanks I would not have known about this from watching fox because I won't. Great work on both your works he advertised there they are among my favorites.
If the following suits you then you are a patriot: You like Bill O'Reilly, You enjoy killing U.S. Troops, You blame your faults on others, You support the Anti-marijuana Campaign, You use 9/11 as a shield, You think guns are a positive thing, You claim to be an activist but in reality your a fat shit whos sits around rooting for Bill O'Reilly, You are a dumbass. I guess being a patriot aint all what it's cut out to be eh?
if u'v ever played GTAIV and wtched the "WEASEL" news that is a parody of FOX, then u'd realize that the absolutely ridiculous parody is infact, much, MUCH cloer to reality.
Bill O' Reilly was hired by FOX to talk the way he does. He gets paid to do it. He simply represents the corrupt greedy anti-populace bigots who have no respect for differing views, and are not even capable of defending themselves against smart people like Robert Greenwald without calling them stupid. What an argument! Oh shut up, you're stupid! haha I would feel utterly stupid myself for defending myself in such a way. In that case I can call that Bill O'Reilly, and of course Rupert losers!
every city with walmart should get together and burn them all down. Oh yea O'reilly don't ever call your self an American again. You are nothing but a greedy communist.
When have conservative multi-millionaires like Bill O'Reilly ever gave a crap about the lives of exploited workers. So he hero-worships successful merchants like the walmart family, and thinks that the workers dont have any legitimate grievances like low pay and benefits?????
Maybe Robert Greenwald lies some, who knows? but there is definitely truth behind his work. Wal-mart is infamous for its poor treatment to workers and its destruction of local economy. just look around.
did he say propoganda? who are you kidding bill oriely does a great job of pushing propoganda and fair and balanced yeah right thats why no one is watching TV anymore never the less the news. I hate to say i watched him when i was a kid but i woke up and i wake people up everyday so get ready world here i come change is on the way. I AM BOYCOTTING WALMART i will spend the rest of my days waking people up to this untill the day they change there ways ill show walmart by waking up people to this
Currently, the documentary is undergoing revisions - because the list of lies and misquotes from Robert Greenwald never cease. But it is interesting to note that Robert Greenwald and his company, "Brave New Films" are supporters of the corrupt organization ACORN. Don't believe me? Here's two examples of proof.
I used to work @ Wal-Mart, there is NOTHING wrong with the way they treat their workers, u think Wal-Mart is bad, try working as a busboy @ a diner, Ive dong that, they treat u like shit, & nobody gives a fuck because u work part time, & theres no money for the unions ect. fuck the far left, Walmart, provides jobs for american citizens, & discount goods for consumers, theyre good for the economy, & these dickheads need to blow it out there ass and get a life!!!
Wow, Walmart hires only part time workers so they don't have to pay them medical benefits and since they fall under the poverty level, tell them to get on Medicaid. Did you work full time? Did you get medical benefits? How is Walmart good for the economy when they don't buy any of the trillions of dollars in goods from American workers? Huh?
@john48martin yes, yes and why is it always walmart...u could say the same about any fast food chain in america, landscaping companies, kmart, target, why is it always walmart? can u tell me that?
Well, this video is talking about Walmart. It is certainly not always about Walmart but why don't you address my comments? I only know about the expose done on walmart, I don't know if Target tells their employees to go get Medicaid. Is your "yes, yes" an answer to my questions? They help China by using cheap labor and cheap tainted products. They are not good for the American economy. Did you see Robert Greenwald's documentary. Did Bill O'Reilly?
Excuse me but if we look at what people have to gain from this (motives) surely it becomes clear that one group is looking at the good of the many and one group is looking for the profit of the few. This then shows us who can be believed. Greed is the driving force behind this. Simple.
I will never understand why Fox News believes that Liberal and Socialist is synonymous with crazy and why these terms are used as insults. 'Liber' comes from the Latin for 'free' and was the basis for the first US constitution.
If socialism means a 'guaranteed wage', it sounds pretty good to me. If I was working for Walmart, I'd expect a 'guaranteed wage' which was fair and based on the hours I worked. I wouldn't expect to have to subsidise my wages with government hand outs.
"Apparently they believe Walmart is the devil on many issues."
No, Bill, most people believe that you and Pox News are the devil on many issues. The only reason your ratings float is because viewers enjoy the inanity of your freak show.
Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges. In times of war, the law falls silent. - Cicero. Is this what we've become? A 21st century Rome where we are driven only by the certainty that Ceasar can do no wrong!
He doesn't have to have shares in Halliburton, He has shares in Fox News who tell him who to hate and what lie to tell. He is a propogandist who lies for a living. Fox has admitted they are liars and have won a court case allowing them to lie. What legitimate news agency would brag about being able to lie? Only Fox. What a perfect name.
Carl Cameron was "caught" on film saying: "If you want to destroy jobs in this country, you raise taxes."
That's quite a partisan position for a news person to utter. That is EXACTLY what Greenwald wanted you to think and come away with. Except that Greenwald forgot an important fact - Cameron was QUOTING what Dan Evans said.
These types of lies permeate left wing smears of Fox News - and ANYTHING the left deems an enemy.
Greenwald is nothing more than a liberal propagandist continuing his attacks on conservatives and Republicans - but there is an upcoming documentary that will reveal his level of hypocrisy and the tactics as spread by the liberal American media.
You have my attention. What documentary is that? I would like to see the revelation of the tactics of exposing large corporations as putting money above consumers. I knew it couldn't be true. Your documentary will expose the truth. Corporations would never put profit above people. This needs to be exposed.
Still waiting to hear from you about this 'documentary that will "reveal his level of hypocrisy". I beleive you are passing along right wing talking points and don't care if they are true, but think you can just put it out there and that will become the accepted opinion. Very Orwellian Em. Yours are the tactics of the uninformed and true false propogandists.
I'm sorry I haven't got back to you, but I have been busy with family. The level of hypocrisy of Robert Greenwald can be seen and debunked by matching up what he says against the truth. The truth is that this man even went as far as to admit his own personal bias and therefore he is a true false propogandist. I challenge you to match up the things he says with what is actually true and don't just resort to biased sources.
oreilly says greenwald is ridiculous, so he's ridiculous, he says he's insane and a liar, propagandist. Doesn't deal with any actual issues greenwald has brought up or researched, just defames his character and name calls. The "no spin zone" I think not, oreilly is a deusche bag.
Hey Twinky, You Loony Libs deserve all the names that appropriately describes your insane actions--It's like, 'watch what we do, not what we say' kind of simple conclusive situational assessment.
I think Newton scientifically best describes it also as, 'every action causes a reaction'.
how insecure are you about your own intelligence? if you claim guns don't increase the death toll here in the states, then focus your energy on controlling people..
that means making alcohol illegal, prescription drugs illegal, have mandatory psychological counseling, you might try to end poverty also because thats one reason crime with guns exists, in fact try controlling every possible human who could pull a trigger. don't sit on your ass.
In a recent article, the UK's Sunday Telegraph revealed that 20,000 knife crimes were committed in 07, where 60 victims a day of violent knife attacks were reported, including the Harry Potter actor, who died of stabbing. Even Beatle George Harrison wasn't spared, when his home was invaded by knife wielding thugs stabbed him but survived.
I guess your loony Liberal Gun Control experiment in England didn't work-did it, 2weak? Cars kill more people than guns, try banning them, you Fascist pig!
This shows the utter ignorance of loony Liberal Gun Control Stalinists on crime statistics, that's why they blindly push their totalitarian disarmament agenda. 16,000 gun suicides is the highest gun death rate and not criminal use--as 2weakbrained's 'rationale' for banning guns. This pathetic loser also get technical on terms (Terrorism or Fascists), relying on synonym technicalities as a diversionary tactic, to hide his utter confusion on my eloquent sarcastic metaphors and analogies.
Instead of wasting you time reading Webster looking for technical synonyms and antonyms, and diverting from the real issues, why don't you get on your illiterate ass and educate yourself on factual statistics and not rely on me to feed your 2weak brain, Moron.
Hey 2weak Bonehead, Water is also the number one killer of children--I guess we should ban water too huh?
I thought you loony Libs are already working on "eradicating poverty" introduced since LBJ's 'war on poverty' socialistic programs? That could have solved the crime problem by now.
Let me guess, that's just one of you moonbats' many failed policies and Social engineering experiments.
These Liberals, they do have simplistic mindset don't they?
Oh yeah, For a twit who is afraid to use his brain and handily retreated from arguments, I would make a safe bet that this aptly applies to none other, but you, Twinky.
once again, this is embarassing.. water is not a WEAPON. how much fruitcake do you eat?
WTF... do you have any ideas at all on how to
cut back on gun violence? do you even care? have you ever lost a loved one and a gun was involved? keep making up these stupid "well people fall off buildings should we stop having buildings" type examples at realize a gun is a fucking WEAPON. honestly you are even embarassing other conservatives.
looks like you missed the gist of the sarcastic metaphor of the main issue by a mile-figures. And it shows how stupid you are, equating 'accidental' occurrences (people falling from buildings) with (intentional) criminal behavior. Explaining it to you would be futile. You're just another Replicant Mutant of the Loony Left, who's programed not to use analytical thinking-just pure emotions.
Bottom line is, when libs ban guns, Criminals thrive and crimes surges-like the murder capital DC,
This bonehead is naive and clueless on how the criminal mind and their enterprises works.
There 20,000 guns laws written in the books under US Codes and statutes--did it affect and stopped criminals from getting guns? Your operative words, "criminals would likely have a hard time stealing them" from gun owners, (because they would likely be killed), is partly true--but they won't have a hard time BUYING them from criminal enterprises, pinhead.
you are right that violence finds its way, and i'm not necessarily saying guns should be banned, but i think its ridiculous to say that they don't make killing people that much easier. and i agree that in britain there are more knife related crimes, but you don't see someone walking into a school and killing 19 people with a knife. if gun violence is going to go down i'd like to hear tacticomp have at least some idea on how to lower it.
You're mind was programmed to have a tunnel vision that guns are just made for killing. As I had told you, there are way, way more people who uses them for self defense, sports, collection/hobbies and entertainment (plinking). Like millions of gunowners, we just don't go around robbing 711s or maiming people in the streets with our guns. There are 80 millions responsible gun owners, do you see 80 million crimes, (not even half of that) happening each day?
there are more people who own a gun for self defense, my question was are there more fatalities regarding gun owners defending themselves or people using guns for crime and murder? its not even close. i believe its about 1% of actual gun related deaths are situations where someone is defending himself in his home. a gun wasn't created for sport dipshit, it was created to kill whether it be in war or for food, its not a fucking baseball card or stamp collection, you make guns sound like toys.
So whose statistics you've been sucking up, 2weakbrain? Handgun Control? Whose stats included 18 to 21 years old "Children" in their child death column of distorted facts?
In your Liberal moonbat world, Guns are evil and should NOT be used for other purpose, and they should be all banned. I got news for you pinhead, millions of people are shooting practical pistol sports, hunting, benchrest, trap and skeet, or for plinking, which you libs never tried--try it sometime, you might enjoy, it's fun.
again keep with the liberal insults, obviously you live in a bullshit world that revolves around unintelligent rants and a complete lack of respect for those that don't agree with you.
grow the fuck up, try having a girlfriend, i asked you a simple question and you've ran in circles trying to avoid it.
did guns make killing easier?
spin that question all you want.
under the same idea you have bombs are not evil, nuclear weopons are not evil, anything created to kill can also be a toy.
ok apparently we are living in alternate realities if you are delusional to think that if yo u are standing across the street and i am hold a gun it won't be easier in any way to kill you. if i wanted to go into a school and kill 15 people that it won't be harder if i don't have a gun.
a nuclear weopon is also an inanimate object, why then are we afraid of pakistan and iran having them? they are inanimate objects, they can't hurt anybody by themselves? neither country has ever used one before?
There is one minor problem with your asinine analogy, you missed the fact that I'm armed, and will respond to a life threatening scenario to defend myself. I can assure you that you're gonna be down, the second you aim that gun on me because of my sport/training, involving fast and accurate shooting in crisis management situations.
So, Bottom line, if you have a gun (a girly girly boy with a gun?!), across the street and about to shoot, my gun would have discharged a double tap in your chest.
my question was "would it be easier to kill you if i had a gun?" again you scatterbrain some bullshoit about shooting me first which is pretty lame and cartoony.
A man in Japan committed a mass stabbing leaving 7 dead & 10 wounded, the attack was ultimately stopped by a Police Officer with a gun. Will Japan ban knives next?
The violence began when the man crashed his 2ton truck into pedestrians. He then jumped out and began stabbing the people he had knocked down with the truck before turning on horrified onlookers.
Hey, 2weak pinhead, guess what other weapon this killer used? Hint: it's big and has 4 wheels.
But the point is, anything can be used for mass killings--so my metaphor, which you missed by miles, is--the simplistic notion is to blame everything on the tools used, then why not ban all of them?
It's not the tools it's the insane perpetrator, and the evil in him.
And it has absolutely nothing to do with the subject of 'Blameism'
If the rocket was invented for space exploration, travel or other purposes, but is now being used as a serious threat by evil despots for weapons of Mass destruction--are we going to keep going to back to reiterating its 'purpose' issue and not tackle on more serious issue that it turned into?
i'm taking this argument back to the private message sector..i'm embarassed that other people watching this video have to see us babble for multiple pages.
2weak: "a nuclear weopon is also an inanimate object, why then are we afraid of pakistan and iran having them? they are inanimate objects, they can't hurt anybody by themselves? neither country has ever used one before?"
So what's your point? pinhead didn't realize he gave me more ammunition to shoot down his arguments, buy stating the obvious,
we need to arm ourselves with more powerful weapons to equalize the situation.
So a(soviet era) MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) stalemate is created
lol, again you change subject.. we have more nuclear warheads than the rest of the world combined..yet we worry about pakistan and iran having nuclear weapons. you've hit the nail on the head and made this easier than i expected.
why do they want to have nuclear weapons?
because we have them, and other countries have them. that is the same rationale for owning guns. if my neighbor has a gun i won't feel safe until i have a gun also.
Folks, this is how stupid can Liberals get. Their simplistic mindset can really be annoying sometimes.
Ours is purely deterrent, (just like how I treat my Conceal Carry Weapon) And we're not insane to just shoot the place up with missiles (again just like how I treat my weapon, I don't go shooting or robbing a 711)
Iran has promised time and again that they will use it to 'erase Israel off the map' and lately, on the US. If that nutcase Ahmadinejhad is joking, we're not laughing!
Unlike you, I don't spend my time all day in front of the computer, since I am very much involved in productive undertakings that makes money and help run the engines of our economy.
2weak: "ok apparently we are living in alternate realities"
You got that right, dickhead. You're in a Utopian fantasy land, while I am in a world where practical reality is essentially, practiced by intelligent and smart people.
But I digress...
Precisely, dickhead- Those missiles are inanimate objects--but who's behind and 'animates' them when they are launched--I hope not monkeys like you.
you stated that a gun doesn't increase the amount of gun fatalities.
prove that, in any way.
go back to reading the dictionary looking for your next "articulate word" that still avoids answering anything and lacks any reason whatsoever. by your own account we shouldn't worry whatsoever about iran and pakistan being nuclear.
Use your common sense and don't be a pathetic monkey brain.
Criminals are predators (duh)and preys on the weak (duh)they love it when the victim is unarmed, and no means of protection--because it not only makes their 'job' easier, it gives them power! Power to do anything over the victim.
Imagine this, if they know a certain area have CCW (conceal carry) statutes in place, their instinct will kick in and they'll avoid that area at all cost, cause' there's a big chance they could get shot.
whats shocking to me is i've talked to gun owners and people who are completely for gun rights, and i've heard good points mentioned that i've taken into consideration in forming a decision, yet you haven't mentioned any of those points which tell me you don't really know what you are talking about. i'd be up for having an adult conversation (big people talk) and hear more about your views, and i'd like to post some of my personal experiences that affect my opinion, PM me if your up for it.
Well if you talked to real gun owners, you'd probably become sensible by now and come to a realization that the right to self defense is an inalienable right, endowed by our creator, that no man or government can grant or take away.
Now we really know the pathetic condition of our educational system--we can see the by product right here in 2weak brain.
As the wisdom of the Founding Founders declared in our Constitution,
Inalienable Right, such as the right to self defense, or say, Man's natural longing for Freedom and Liberty, is a right that was not granted by man, (and cannot be taken away by men)--but by our Creator. But if you're an Atheists, you probably would not know this.
google the word "liberty" before you start spouting what you think it means.
there is no logic in a debate on religion because it is a "faith" a "belief".
i could tell you that i believe in ghosts but how can you disprove it? you can't because its a belief. so what would be the point of me trying to rationalize and debate you on a belief?
this is my last response so soak it in.
its been fun, thanks for the jerry springer like entertainment but its become boring and repetetive. take care kid
lol. ok sorry next time i'll let you control what stats i can look up, my bad.
and those stats i took out of a high school library when i was looking up both sides of the debate, before i had formed any opinion.
they are probably old stats since i haven't been in high school in 8 years. so i'll admit that but don't scrutinize my information when you haven't posted one fact that backs up anything you say. if you want to actually talk about this as rational people and not act like a child pm me
That's really sad 2weak, you've been out of high school for 8 long years, and yet your IQ is still in the middle school level.
And if you honestly looked at both sides of the issue, (and resisted indoctrination by Liberal teachers), you don't actually need stats, all you need is simple common sense--If you disarm the law abiding citizens, they will be vulnerable to criminals who will not obey any laws (no kidding) and will have a hell of a heyday finding easy victims to rape and plunder.
liberal teachers? you have no clue where my opinions come from. i wasn't "taught" any sort of point of view. and you are starting to sound like a terrorist yourself with all this liberal conspiracy bullshit you are spewing. i came on this board to watch this video and saw that you were insulting people and comparing pencils to guns and i decided to interject because its a retarded example.
i didn't state i wanted to ban guns, i only stated that you cannot control people.
Let's revisit the phrase, "Watch what we do, not what we say" You claim to be "not a liberal" and yet, you hate guns and engage in 'blameism', blaming the object instead of the perpetrator.
You're "not for banning guns" and yet you highly espouse and defend the UK's gun control--citing its superficial 'benefits'.
Why hide your Liberal utopian beliefs?
My comparison is a sarcastic metaphor and a parody of the Liberal Lefts' twisted moronic worldview and It's not supposed to be literal, pinhead.
so by using sarcasm you were lieing in a sense? if i wasn't supposed to take the pencil analogy seriously then why use it? sarcasm is an exxageration, you cannot exxagerate an absolute. its either right or wrong. honestly drop the insecurity.
i'm about trying to find answers, you stated that guns have about as much impact on the murder rates in the country as a pencil am i wrong? obviously you spend too much time on using a vast amount of words yet you put little thought into the actual issue
thrive on emotions? lol, you are all over the place insulting and you have to mention rosi o'donnel in some inarticulate unfunny joke thats full of emotional hatred at those that disagree with you.
and again it amazes me that you have yet to bring up the most pivotal 2 arguments in the whole issue.
You failed to comprehend that it's not a comparison of those items with each other, it's the asinine concept of 'Blameism'-people not taking responsibilities anymore.
The sarcastic metaphor, or analogy (since that word is too heavy for your brain) were very clear
-that the person blames the pencil for his writing mistakes
-the drunk blames the car and 'made' him drive.
-that Walmart forces you to buy from them.
-that fat people blames the spoon for making them eat and gain weight.
And the question was way off topic in the scheme of things. (Talk about diverting the issues). I was talking about human behavior and the rampant 'Blame game' the loony Liberals are consistently playing--to them there's always something or someone to blame, except those who actually did the despicable acts. Loony Liberals does not believe in consequences of one's own actions, or the sad reality of personal responsibility.
so you are blaming blameism? you have to see the hypocritical comedic value of that...come on, an lol? even though i voted democrat the last few elections for various reasons it doesn't mean i think they are the answer.
i don't like the 2 party system, with both parties having side agendas that exclude the people. this is why i hate stereotypes, accountability has always been important to me, i want harsher punishment for violent crimes, child abuse and neglect, rape, corporate crime....ect..
It really sad that a 25 year old, fresh from college (so you say) is so dumb to see the ironic, humorous sarcasm of this parody.
No wonder, you're whining for not making as much money like others your age--your boss probably noticed you're slow and had low IQ to comprehend simple things. And it shows, you can't seem to grasp my superb sarcastic analogy on 'Blameism' (I'm not using metaphor again, it might short circuit your 2weak brain). What a waste of College money.
So you can hopefully comprehend what's being discussed. It'll help you with your job too in making you understand things--your boss will thank me for that.
Gun owners loves me for that superb analogy and shooting down (pun intended) all of your typical anti-gun asinine arguments and liberal talking points.
Talk to the real life Gun Owners and not just those imaginary creations of "Gun Owners" in that 2weak brain of yours.
"police reports say a nutty right wing blow-hard was spotted trolling around youtube with what witnesses claim can only be a complete lack of maturity".. "when the perpetrater was confronted he began to wail in a high pitch bird-like sound described only as a "caw" of some sorts, he then began waving a gun around and making bizarre statements about loony liberal communist agendas, and sean hannity being the re-incarnation of christ".
viewers are warned to avoid feeding tacticomp any logic.
well tacti.. its been fun. but i'm going to move on. you are bat-fuck crazy, thanks for the financial information on how much money you have in your bank?? usually when i'm losing a debate i pull out my wallet?? athough i find it interesting that you took our private message debate back to the public,
i will not judge you. maybe your parents found out that you were talking to this "strange man" on that there private message machine and they began to worry.
the game was over long ago.. you've been playing with yourself for some time now.
it was fun watching at first, but eventually
i realised you don't just have different political views, you repeat shit borderline with those like timothy mcveigh and the unibomber. racism, sexism, you want liberals to be killed?...
there is no conscience on the other end of this computer screen. have your "check-mate"
You're absolutely right,2weak--the game was over a long time ago when you pathetically didn't comprehend the parody of Liberal 'blameism' and accountability.
And espoused leftist demagogue, sucked up from their playbook. Here's a good advice: use your own brain and do some analytical thinking, and not suck up your opinions on moonbat talking points and soundbites.
on a side note try replying with an actual answer to my question about the 2 best arguments gun owners have, or maybe what a gun was created for, or why the 2nd amendment exists,. i find it hard to believe someone would rather procreate with you than take their own life. maybe i should believe in miracles. i realize you aren't going to let me leave this argument. a toast to insecurity?
"loony liberals" and "2weak" together in the same rebuttle. dear lord..please start protesting at obama rallies, you are the exact kind of republican that will make obama supporters feel like intellectual gods. if i was ever going to be a comedian i'd definitely have you open for me. honestly are you even a real person? i've often wondered if you are a democrat disguised as a republican in hopes of making republicans look like fuckin idiots. please if this is a democrat let me in on it...
Washington DC, the murder capital of the USA, New York, Chicago, and other cities with the most restrictive gun control laws and outright ban on gun ownership, was the epitome of the failure of these Stalinist experiment. These cities have the highest crime stats in the nation, while those cities which protects it's citizens rights and had lax CCW statutes, are the exact opposite. Criminals are predators, the more defenseless you are, the better. Thanks to Libs like you 2weak. Felons loves you.
stalinist experiment? wtf, what kind of loon are you? and i'm not a liberal dumbass. women who carry a firearm with them have a 91% of having that gun used against them, not them even getting the chance to use it for protection. look up your facts dipshit.
When the young disturbed gunman tried to shoot people in a Colorado Christian Church, A volunteer woman with a concealed carry firearm confronted this crazy young man and stopped him cold from inflicting more casualties. So here's an idea, 2weak. To drastically lessen or even stop this and other forms of random violence from happening-Stop the assault on the rights of law abiding citizens to own a gun and defend themselves, since they are the only ones diligent enough to go that tedious process.
and what was he going to use in that church? a gun? exactly, in your world every human even children would have guns. i've had a gun pulled on me a couple different times and not even by criminals, but wacko's like yourself that are so insecure they need a firarm to feel like a man. again you need guns to protect yourself from other people who have guns? ironic isn't it? and again how does that lower gun violence? you've changed the subject on every question i've asked you.
Nice try, but it still doesn't really prove your lame argument-that an inanimate object could actually kill on it's own.
How many lunatic goes into church and massacre churchgoers? Once in a blue moon, and luckily, one person with foresight on eventualities like these was prepared, averting further tragedy. This incident actually proved my point on the right to self defense, and handily shot down your ignorant assertion that one's reason to own a gun are only for egoistic reasons, not survival.
Here's the bottom line 2weakbrain. I hope, that you'd get mugged by a scumbag thug whom you though wasn't responsible for his actions and blamed his tools instead.
Let's see how that will drastically change your perspective in the right of an individual to self defense, pinhead.
The protection of our Freedom--specifically the 2nd amendment.
This 2weak pinhead's proclivity to dictate on the rest of us, is the quintessential Stalinist Liberalism. Who arrogantly thinks they are better than us and knows more than we do, on what to do with our lives, or what to own and not what to own.
I don't need you to speak for me, and I don't remember siding with you - I speak for myself. This is my stance. Take it or leave it.
I simply stated that violence is violence. Did I say that it's evil? No, unless you count self-defense as some sort of crime.
All I'm saying is that I don't mind public firearms ownership, provided that there are effective safeguards and that the said public has enough sense to only use their weapons only when absolutely necessary.
So is Japan, The 'Yakusa' can buy it in the blackmarket from many sources, smuggle them, and make a profit on the side with their 'gunrunning' racket.
And Britain's is not far behind. If you just get up on your lazy ass and research. The Brits' gun crime rate is drastically going up due to the gun blackmarket, mostly supplied by the globally growing Russian mafia.
Like most peacenik moonbats, You're so naive on how the criminal mind works. Evil do exists, and will thrive, laws or no laws.
and you are talking about gun violence going up? well then it must have been down before,
way to prove my point, and keep on failing to post any of the facts you keep calling me too lazy to look up. "evil do exists"? what like vampires? there are bad people out there, i'm not stupid, but show me any sort of statistic that shows where an increase in gun ownership has attributed to less gun violence? and don't show some town with 100 people in it as an example.
Your IQ level is that pathetic. the whole point there is that your touted, absolutist UK gun control didn't work, pinhead. Knives were being use extensively and guns for some time, but when Russia collapse in the late 80s, their various criminal enterprises exploded and shot up (pun intended) to unprecedented heights and gunrunning is now their lucrative business, and which also proves that your Stalinist gun free utopia is an utter failure, always been, always have.
stalinist? is stalin the only communist you've heard of? marx or lenin or anybody? i'm not communist but at least try to make your point without using extreme situations.
get your mouth off limbaugh's dick for a second and think about it.
You obviously don't know the history of the Joseph Stalin era. (oh Look! 2weak is googling!)
I'll give you a hint: 20 Millions brutally died during his reign. How?--since you're googling, find out how.
I noticed you have this preoccupation with saying "mouth on someone's dick"...hmmm, looks like you have some little secret that your parents don't know about, when your next door friend is having a sleep over.
Sigmund Freud was right after all. The subconscious mind (and mouth) can be revealing.
Propaganda? His Bill O'Reilly ever heard himself talk?
kflo143 1 month ago
Rob Walton and supporters can't seem to discredit any film by Mr. Greenwald and Brave New Films, so they resort to misinformation and other odious strategies. Sam's Club 6625 management in San Fernando California, lied and kept the bonuses in 2005/2006. Americans who firmly support outsourcing of everything, please give them a first class ticket to the People's Republic of China and declare them Persona Non Grata when they try to visit the US.
lamourlupus 6 months ago
wal mart is unamerican
thereal3rdi 9 months ago
It really bothers me that those poor mistreated Wal Mart employees aren't allowed to simply resign. It's tragic that Wal Mart came to them and forced them to accept employment.
TheOldGrady 9 months ago
There is a liar an an idiot here but it's not Robert Greenwald.
2c40r2it 9 months ago
@2c40r2it Greenwald is a liar, you liberal asshole. All of you liberal motherfuckers think that every big business should be unionized. And when a big corporation such as Wal*Mart refuse to unionize, you asshole liberals attack them. I got news for you liberal hacks Wal*Mart isn't going anywhere, because they are WAY TOO big to go down by you liberal motherfuckers. They only way they will fail if people will stop shopping there, and I don't see that happening anytime soon.
simwrangler 9 months ago
Probably just wants wallmart to treat its workers better, some folk dont know when they're being whored.
BraniusBalki 10 months ago
I love Wal-Mart. Good prices and a great place to work.
TheSkeetergirl 11 months ago
Thanks I would not have known about this from watching fox because I won't. Great work on both your works he advertised there they are among my favorites.
uben56 11 months ago
if billdo dosent like someone then you know they are ok.
externalpower 11 months ago 2
Bill O'Reilly is a cunt liar.
epilp88 11 months ago 3
We can smell your B.O all the way from Australia.
krazymindreader 1 year ago 3
@krazymindreader
Lol! Its a disorder, I swear America uses deo'reillyant but the stench just keeps creeping up anyway!
MadBagOfHorses 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If the following suits you then you are a patriot: You like Bill O'Reilly, You enjoy killing U.S. Troops, You blame your faults on others, You support the Anti-marijuana Campaign, You use 9/11 as a shield, You think guns are a positive thing, You claim to be an activist but in reality your a fat shit whos sits around rooting for Bill O'Reilly, You are a dumbass. I guess being a patriot aint all what it's cut out to be eh?
mark5angel 1 year ago
how much u want to bet Bill's on Wal-Mart's payroll?
AddisonHock 1 year ago
It is the same as saying " the person that smelt it delt it " If O'Reilly smells a liar it's because he is the liar
daveusaz1218 1 year ago
I miss Kennedy
wateryskipper 1 year ago 8
Bill O calling someone a liar and an idiot means to me that the guy must be telling the truth.
azmildman 1 year ago 4
how can Bill O have the nerve to say outfoxed was dishonest he isnt known for be totally honest now is he
fordyboy54 1 year ago
bill is a fool
kuriaki71 1 year ago 2
if u'v ever played GTAIV and wtched the "WEASEL" news that is a parody of FOX, then u'd realize that the absolutely ridiculous parody is infact, much, MUCH cloer to reality.
ArchStar9 1 year ago
If making sure people aren't forced to work for as little as possible is socialism - sign me up.
RipTheJackR 1 year ago
Everyone has their weakness and all the news are controlled. this is why I don't watch news and I don't understand why people do?
JesusGodHolySpirit3 1 year ago
:JIHAD TO POX NEWS...lol this guys are a bunch of bozos...lol
jose5151 1 year ago
greenwald is so importent he is the only one with balls to stand up for the us, U degrad the only people with the truth at hand !
kingangis999 1 year ago
billo is always a clown
likesspice73 1 year ago 4
I want an interview with Billy O'reilly ..
and i am gonna shut him up...
Having the right to live a decent life doesn't mean Socialism ...
If it does then Socialism is want most American need.
sweetafghanboy2 1 year ago 2
Bill O' Reilly was hired by FOX to talk the way he does. He gets paid to do it. He simply represents the corrupt greedy anti-populace bigots who have no respect for differing views, and are not even capable of defending themselves against smart people like Robert Greenwald without calling them stupid. What an argument! Oh shut up, you're stupid! haha I would feel utterly stupid myself for defending myself in such a way. In that case I can call that Bill O'Reilly, and of course Rupert losers!
GoTaiwan2007 1 year ago 4
@GoTaiwan2007 Hell ya im glad u can handle the truth !
kingangis999 1 year ago
Have another drink Ted. Oh that's right your fucking dead. Thank god.
dukeljk 1 year ago
every city with walmart should get together and burn them all down. Oh yea O'reilly don't ever call your self an American again. You are nothing but a greedy communist.
MegaAra1 1 year ago
WOW I didn't ever know that TV shows could be so blatantly corrupt.
mshizzlzz 1 year ago
When have conservative multi-millionaires like Bill O'Reilly ever gave a crap about the lives of exploited workers. So he hero-worships successful merchants like the walmart family, and thinks that the workers dont have any legitimate grievances like low pay and benefits?????
wb8594 1 year ago
Maybe Robert Greenwald lies some, who knows? but there is definitely truth behind his work. Wal-mart is infamous for its poor treatment to workers and its destruction of local economy. just look around.
mshizzlzz 1 year ago
@mshizzlzz Nothere not the pay there is actually pretty good, I worked for 10 years on a farm for 6 bucks an hour.
dukeljk 1 year ago
@dukeljk I work at a local farm for nine bucks an hour.
mshizzlzz 1 year ago
Telling the truth about Greenwald is NOT smearing.
Greenwald REGULARLY lies in his pieces.
His lie filled movie "Outfoxed" was an endless parade of lies and purposeful misleadings.
ToddAldrich 1 year ago
Whoa did I just see a former Democrat mention family values!!
ChrisWalsh726 2 years ago
did he say propoganda? who are you kidding bill oriely does a great job of pushing propoganda and fair and balanced yeah right thats why no one is watching TV anymore never the less the news. I hate to say i watched him when i was a kid but i woke up and i wake people up everyday so get ready world here i come change is on the way. I AM BOYCOTTING WALMART i will spend the rest of my days waking people up to this untill the day they change there ways ill show walmart by waking up people to this
casinohijack 2 years ago
Comment removed
mshizzlzz 1 year ago
Currently, the documentary is undergoing revisions - because the list of lies and misquotes from Robert Greenwald never cease. But it is interesting to note that Robert Greenwald and his company, "Brave New Films" are supporters of the corrupt organization ACORN. Don't believe me? Here's two examples of proof.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
Bill O'Reilly- on point as always. That documentary was such a load of BS and I'm glad Bill saw through it.
jimcooperjr 2 years ago
I used to work @ Wal-Mart, there is NOTHING wrong with the way they treat their workers, u think Wal-Mart is bad, try working as a busboy @ a diner, Ive dong that, they treat u like shit, & nobody gives a fuck because u work part time, & theres no money for the unions ect. fuck the far left, Walmart, provides jobs for american citizens, & discount goods for consumers, theyre good for the economy, & these dickheads need to blow it out there ass and get a life!!!
PsychoticSpasm 2 years ago
Wow, Walmart hires only part time workers so they don't have to pay them medical benefits and since they fall under the poverty level, tell them to get on Medicaid. Did you work full time? Did you get medical benefits? How is Walmart good for the economy when they don't buy any of the trillions of dollars in goods from American workers? Huh?
john48martin 2 years ago
@john48martin yes, yes and why is it always walmart...u could say the same about any fast food chain in america, landscaping companies, kmart, target, why is it always walmart? can u tell me that?
PsychoticSpasm 2 years ago
Well, this video is talking about Walmart. It is certainly not always about Walmart but why don't you address my comments? I only know about the expose done on walmart, I don't know if Target tells their employees to go get Medicaid. Is your "yes, yes" an answer to my questions? They help China by using cheap labor and cheap tainted products. They are not good for the American economy. Did you see Robert Greenwald's documentary. Did Bill O'Reilly?
john48martin 2 years ago
Like Robert Greenwald hasn't ever smeared anyone
ArchEnemy617 2 years ago 2
Greenwald is a hero..
heal2012 2 years ago
Excuse me but if we look at what people have to gain from this (motives) surely it becomes clear that one group is looking at the good of the many and one group is looking for the profit of the few. This then shows us who can be believed. Greed is the driving force behind this. Simple.
gillypopb 2 years ago
I will never understand why Fox News believes that Liberal and Socialist is synonymous with crazy and why these terms are used as insults. 'Liber' comes from the Latin for 'free' and was the basis for the first US constitution.
If socialism means a 'guaranteed wage', it sounds pretty good to me. If I was working for Walmart, I'd expect a 'guaranteed wage' which was fair and based on the hours I worked. I wouldn't expect to have to subsidise my wages with government hand outs.
marieloud 2 years ago
"Apparently they believe Walmart is the devil on many issues."
No, Bill, most people believe that you and Pox News are the devil on many issues. The only reason your ratings float is because viewers enjoy the inanity of your freak show.
p3snooper 2 years ago
that guy is the bigest dipshit ever he should die with bush
kazooga1234 3 years ago
Greenwald is a communist who hates America.
He belongs in Gitmo getting waterboarded 24/7.
CliffordDawgg 3 years ago
Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges. In times of war, the law falls silent. - Cicero. Is this what we've become? A 21st century Rome where we are driven only by the certainty that Ceasar can do no wrong!
luccaskunk 3 years ago
This guy Bill is stupid.One word STUPID
podgybear 3 years ago
Fox dont like been exposed for the liars they are, i wonder if Billo has shares in Halliburton, anyone know.
simonbayes1 3 years ago
Very well written!...not!
commonsense010000 2 years ago
He doesn't have to have shares in Halliburton, He has shares in Fox News who tell him who to hate and what lie to tell. He is a propogandist who lies for a living. Fox has admitted they are liars and have won a court case allowing them to lie. What legitimate news agency would brag about being able to lie? Only Fox. What a perfect name.
john48martin 2 years ago
Comment removed
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
YOU are lying here. Do you liberals have no shame???
ToddAldrich 1 year ago
An example of Greenwald's lying in "out foxed"
Carl Cameron was "caught" on film saying: "If you want to destroy jobs in this country, you raise taxes."
That's quite a partisan position for a news person to utter. That is EXACTLY what Greenwald wanted you to think and come away with. Except that Greenwald forgot an important fact - Cameron was QUOTING what Dan Evans said.
These types of lies permeate left wing smears of Fox News - and ANYTHING the left deems an enemy.
ToddAldrich 1 year ago
Apparently Greenwald had hit where it hurts, thats why the fox attack dogs are barking so hard.
ATrueSriLankan 3 years ago 19
Greenwald is nothing more than a liberal propagandist continuing his attacks on conservatives and Republicans - but there is an upcoming documentary that will reveal his level of hypocrisy and the tactics as spread by the liberal American media.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
You have my attention. What documentary is that? I would like to see the revelation of the tactics of exposing large corporations as putting money above consumers. I knew it couldn't be true. Your documentary will expose the truth. Corporations would never put profit above people. This needs to be exposed.
john48martin 2 years ago
Still waiting to hear from you about this 'documentary that will "reveal his level of hypocrisy". I beleive you are passing along right wing talking points and don't care if they are true, but think you can just put it out there and that will become the accepted opinion. Very Orwellian Em. Yours are the tactics of the uninformed and true false propogandists.
john48martin 2 years ago
I'm sorry I haven't got back to you, but I have been busy with family. The level of hypocrisy of Robert Greenwald can be seen and debunked by matching up what he says against the truth. The truth is that this man even went as far as to admit his own personal bias and therefore he is a true false propogandist. I challenge you to match up the things he says with what is actually true and don't just resort to biased sources.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
They compared Robert Greenwald to Fidel Castro because.. they think he's an asshole?
klsjafksjdfklsdfjkls 3 years ago
Im still waitng for the day someone shoots o reilly in the face.
Ironlungzzzz 3 years ago
1:03 - O'Reilly almost says "fucking."
topraman517 3 years ago
Well, I think O'Reilly is a liar and an idiot himself...I don't understand why he is still on TV despite him being such an asshole to so many people.
And also it seems that most Americans who seem to be smart (for example Letterman) do really dislike him.
Tarula 3 years ago
oreilly says greenwald is ridiculous, so he's ridiculous, he says he's insane and a liar, propagandist. Doesn't deal with any actual issues greenwald has brought up or researched, just defames his character and name calls. The "no spin zone" I think not, oreilly is a deusche bag.
4yearcanuck 3 years ago
amen 4yearcanuck. o'reilly doesn't address anything greenwald said. probably too busy sexually harassing women at work.
2eak 3 years ago
How Dare you! Bill O'Reilly is the source of truth, white pride, honisty and reality! He never lies, and he's always right!
monky999 3 years ago
These people?!?!?!?!
crimsong19 3 years ago
I don't think name-calling your critics merits as a civilized means of defending yourself. Oh wait, it's Bill, nvm.
TwinSkies 3 years ago
Hey Twinky, You Loony Libs deserve all the names that appropriately describes your insane actions--It's like, 'watch what we do, not what we say' kind of simple conclusive situational assessment.
I think Newton scientifically best describes it also as, 'every action causes a reaction'.
tacticomp 3 years ago
tacticunt... are you seriously quoting newton?
how insecure are you about your own intelligence? if you claim guns don't increase the death toll here in the states, then focus your energy on controlling people..
that means making alcohol illegal, prescription drugs illegal, have mandatory psychological counseling, you might try to end poverty also because thats one reason crime with guns exists, in fact try controlling every possible human who could pull a trigger. don't sit on your ass.
2eak 3 years ago
In a recent article, the UK's Sunday Telegraph revealed that 20,000 knife crimes were committed in 07, where 60 victims a day of violent knife attacks were reported, including the Harry Potter actor, who died of stabbing. Even Beatle George Harrison wasn't spared, when his home was invaded by knife wielding thugs stabbed him but survived.
I guess your loony Liberal Gun Control experiment in England didn't work-did it, 2weak? Cars kill more people than guns, try banning them, you Fascist pig!
tacticomp 3 years ago
lol.
i just looked it up.
why didn't you post the amount of knife related fatalities in britain in 2007?
compare that total to the amount of gun related deaths in the u.s. in 2007.
don't post misleading facts dipshit.
and look up the definition of fascism because i truly doubt you know what it means.
2eak 3 years ago
This shows the utter ignorance of loony Liberal Gun Control Stalinists on crime statistics, that's why they blindly push their totalitarian disarmament agenda. 16,000 gun suicides is the highest gun death rate and not criminal use--as 2weakbrained's 'rationale' for banning guns. This pathetic loser also get technical on terms (Terrorism or Fascists), relying on synonym technicalities as a diversionary tactic, to hide his utter confusion on my eloquent sarcastic metaphors and analogies.
tacticomp 3 years ago
hahahaha..
suicides?
thats a statistic i count dipshit.
and way to stray from looking up the definitions by changing the sunject, really tells me you are serious about what you say.
look it up dipshit.
quit changing sunject......
lol.
2eak 3 years ago
Instead of wasting you time reading Webster looking for technical synonyms and antonyms, and diverting from the real issues, why don't you get on your illiterate ass and educate yourself on factual statistics and not rely on me to feed your 2weak brain, Moron.
tacticomp 3 years ago
factual statistics? it appears i brought my "guns" to a knife fight.
if i am intimidating you by asking for statistics you can't provide let me know.
lol.
2eak 3 years ago
2weak: "it appears I brought my "guns" to a knife fight.
Sounds just like you--bringing a knife to a gunfight with a gunslinger.
Translation: Your brain is ill equip against my eloquent points.
tacticomp 3 years ago
Hey 2weak Bonehead, Water is also the number one killer of children--I guess we should ban water too huh?
I thought you loony Libs are already working on "eradicating poverty" introduced since LBJ's 'war on poverty' socialistic programs? That could have solved the crime problem by now.
Let me guess, that's just one of you moonbats' many failed policies and Social engineering experiments.
These Liberals, they do have simplistic mindset don't they?
That's what happens when you don't use brains.
tacticomp 3 years ago
"That's what happens when you don't use brains."
You are your argument's best point.
TwinSkies 3 years ago
Oh yeah, For a twit who is afraid to use his brain and handily retreated from arguments, I would make a safe bet that this aptly applies to none other, but you, Twinky.
tacticomp 3 years ago
So says the one who can't seem to keep himself from directly name-calling those around him. Yes, brilliant.
TwinSkies 3 years ago
once again, this is embarassing.. water is not a WEAPON. how much fruitcake do you eat?
WTF... do you have any ideas at all on how to
cut back on gun violence? do you even care? have you ever lost a loved one and a gun was involved? keep making up these stupid "well people fall off buildings should we stop having buildings" type examples at realize a gun is a fucking WEAPON. honestly you are even embarassing other conservatives.
either make a logical point or go read a book.
2eak 3 years ago
looks like you missed the gist of the sarcastic metaphor of the main issue by a mile-figures. And it shows how stupid you are, equating 'accidental' occurrences (people falling from buildings) with (intentional) criminal behavior. Explaining it to you would be futile. You're just another Replicant Mutant of the Loony Left, who's programed not to use analytical thinking-just pure emotions.
Bottom line is, when libs ban guns, Criminals thrive and crimes surges-like the murder capital DC,
tacticomp 3 years ago
funny you tell me this because i brought up the same issues face to face with representatives from the NRA and they couldn't explain jack shit.
if guns were illegal criminals would likely have a harder time stealing them from stores and people or is that hard to understand?
once again i think i may be moving too fast for you.
2eak 3 years ago
This bonehead is naive and clueless on how the criminal mind and their enterprises works.
There 20,000 guns laws written in the books under US Codes and statutes--did it affect and stopped criminals from getting guns? Your operative words, "criminals would likely have a hard time stealing them" from gun owners, (because they would likely be killed), is partly true--but they won't have a hard time BUYING them from criminal enterprises, pinhead.
tacticomp 3 years ago
guns are illegal in britain tell me how many gun fatalities there were due to all the criminals that "had guns"
all you do is try to use big words to prove intelligence but you make it clear that you don't even understand the words you use.
honestly at least try to make 1 valid point.
and the loony liberal BS is getting boring and old.
2eak 3 years ago
I hate to burst your bubble, but you guys do seem to have an awful lot of stabbing-related incidents.
Violence will happen regardless of the tools used.
I'm very much a supporter of responsible firearms ownership, FYI.
TwinSkies 3 years ago
i'm not from britain.
i'm from the U.S.
you are right that violence finds its way, and i'm not necessarily saying guns should be banned, but i think its ridiculous to say that they don't make killing people that much easier. and i agree that in britain there are more knife related crimes, but you don't see someone walking into a school and killing 19 people with a knife. if gun violence is going to go down i'd like to hear tacticomp have at least some idea on how to lower it.
2eak 3 years ago
You're mind was programmed to have a tunnel vision that guns are just made for killing. As I had told you, there are way, way more people who uses them for self defense, sports, collection/hobbies and entertainment (plinking). Like millions of gunowners, we just don't go around robbing 711s or maiming people in the streets with our guns. There are 80 millions responsible gun owners, do you see 80 million crimes, (not even half of that) happening each day?
tacticomp 3 years ago
there are more people who own a gun for self defense, my question was are there more fatalities regarding gun owners defending themselves or people using guns for crime and murder? its not even close. i believe its about 1% of actual gun related deaths are situations where someone is defending himself in his home. a gun wasn't created for sport dipshit, it was created to kill whether it be in war or for food, its not a fucking baseball card or stamp collection, you make guns sound like toys.
2eak 3 years ago
So whose statistics you've been sucking up, 2weakbrain? Handgun Control? Whose stats included 18 to 21 years old "Children" in their child death column of distorted facts?
In your Liberal moonbat world, Guns are evil and should NOT be used for other purpose, and they should be all banned. I got news for you pinhead, millions of people are shooting practical pistol sports, hunting, benchrest, trap and skeet, or for plinking, which you libs never tried--try it sometime, you might enjoy, it's fun.
tacticomp 3 years ago
again keep with the liberal insults, obviously you live in a bullshit world that revolves around unintelligent rants and a complete lack of respect for those that don't agree with you.
grow the fuck up, try having a girlfriend, i asked you a simple question and you've ran in circles trying to avoid it.
did guns make killing easier?
spin that question all you want.
under the same idea you have bombs are not evil, nuclear weopons are not evil, anything created to kill can also be a toy.
2eak 3 years ago
2weak is asking "did guns make killing easier?"
NO! Because they are inanimate objects and don't have a mind of their own.
Now the one who's holding the gun is a different matter.
If I put a gun on the table, what will it do? Nothing!
Now if I pick it up, what will happen? Nothing!
Because of the simple fact, that I abide by the law, and will not use it unlawfully.
If a felon, who have a mile long record, picks it up, what will most likely happen?
He could use it to kill both of us!
tacticomp 3 years ago
ok apparently we are living in alternate realities if you are delusional to think that if yo u are standing across the street and i am hold a gun it won't be easier in any way to kill you. if i wanted to go into a school and kill 15 people that it won't be harder if i don't have a gun.
a nuclear weopon is also an inanimate object, why then are we afraid of pakistan and iran having them? they are inanimate objects, they can't hurt anybody by themselves? neither country has ever used one before?
2eak 3 years ago
There is one minor problem with your asinine analogy, you missed the fact that I'm armed, and will respond to a life threatening scenario to defend myself. I can assure you that you're gonna be down, the second you aim that gun on me because of my sport/training, involving fast and accurate shooting in crisis management situations.
So, Bottom line, if you have a gun (a girly girly boy with a gun?!), across the street and about to shoot, my gun would have discharged a double tap in your chest.
tacticomp 3 years ago
it took you a day to come up with that?
again with the insults.
this isn't the wild west.
my question was "would it be easier to kill you if i had a gun?" again you scatterbrain some bullshoit about shooting me first which is pretty lame and cartoony.
if these questions are too hard let me know.
2eak 3 years ago
"it won't be harder if i don't have a gun"
A man in Japan committed a mass stabbing leaving 7 dead & 10 wounded, the attack was ultimately stopped by a Police Officer with a gun. Will Japan ban knives next?
The violence began when the man crashed his 2ton truck into pedestrians. He then jumped out and began stabbing the people he had knocked down with the truck before turning on horrified onlookers.
Hey, 2weak pinhead, guess what other weapon this killer used? Hint: it's big and has 4 wheels.
tacticomp 3 years ago
you had to look to japan to find a multiple death incident with knives eh?
and once again you compare something that wasn't created to kill, but has been used to kill with something created to kill.
try harder next time.
2eak 3 years ago
But the point is, anything can be used for mass killings--so my metaphor, which you missed by miles, is--the simplistic notion is to blame everything on the tools used, then why not ban all of them?
It's not the tools it's the insane perpetrator, and the evil in him.
tacticomp 3 years ago
i asked what a gun was created for.
and you have failed to answer that time and time again.
2eak 3 years ago
And I answered that asinine question numerous times, 2weak pinhead.
tacticomp 3 years ago
And it has absolutely nothing to do with the subject of 'Blameism'
If the rocket was invented for space exploration, travel or other purposes, but is now being used as a serious threat by evil despots for weapons of Mass destruction--are we going to keep going to back to reiterating its 'purpose' issue and not tackle on more serious issue that it turned into?
tacticomp 3 years ago
i'm taking this argument back to the private message sector..i'm embarassed that other people watching this video have to see us babble for multiple pages.
so lets continue there.
2eak 3 years ago
Great evasive strategy when losing an argument.
You hide your pathetic ignorance.
tacticomp 3 years ago
hey i'm not the one bragging about how much money i have in the bank when i'm losing an argument.
2eak 3 years ago
2weak: "a nuclear weopon is also an inanimate object, why then are we afraid of pakistan and iran having them? they are inanimate objects, they can't hurt anybody by themselves? neither country has ever used one before?"
So what's your point? pinhead didn't realize he gave me more ammunition to shoot down his arguments, buy stating the obvious,
we need to arm ourselves with more powerful weapons to equalize the situation.
So a(soviet era) MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) stalemate is created
tacticomp 3 years ago
lol, again you change subject.. we have more nuclear warheads than the rest of the world combined..yet we worry about pakistan and iran having nuclear weapons. you've hit the nail on the head and made this easier than i expected.
why do they want to have nuclear weapons?
because we have them, and other countries have them. that is the same rationale for owning guns. if my neighbor has a gun i won't feel safe until i have a gun also.
so thanks for supporting iran and pakistan.
dipshit.
2eak 3 years ago
Folks, this is how stupid can Liberals get. Their simplistic mindset can really be annoying sometimes.
Ours is purely deterrent, (just like how I treat my Conceal Carry Weapon) And we're not insane to just shoot the place up with missiles (again just like how I treat my weapon, I don't go shooting or robbing a 711)
Iran has promised time and again that they will use it to 'erase Israel off the map' and lately, on the US. If that nutcase Ahmadinejhad is joking, we're not laughing!
tacticomp 3 years ago
again you avoid the question.
you are not even trying to debate.
you spent a week going through the dictionary and you came back with nothing.
2eak 3 years ago
Unlike you, I don't spend my time all day in front of the computer, since I am very much involved in productive undertakings that makes money and help run the engines of our economy.
tacticomp 3 years ago
2weak: "ok apparently we are living in alternate realities"
You got that right, dickhead. You're in a Utopian fantasy land, while I am in a world where practical reality is essentially, practiced by intelligent and smart people.
But I digress...
Precisely, dickhead- Those missiles are inanimate objects--but who's behind and 'animates' them when they are launched--I hope not monkeys like you.
tacticomp 3 years ago
you stated that a gun doesn't increase the amount of gun fatalities.
prove that, in any way.
go back to reading the dictionary looking for your next "articulate word" that still avoids answering anything and lacks any reason whatsoever. by your own account we shouldn't worry whatsoever about iran and pakistan being nuclear.
2eak 3 years ago
Use your common sense and don't be a pathetic monkey brain.
Criminals are predators (duh)and preys on the weak (duh)they love it when the victim is unarmed, and no means of protection--because it not only makes their 'job' easier, it gives them power! Power to do anything over the victim.
Imagine this, if they know a certain area have CCW (conceal carry) statutes in place, their instinct will kick in and they'll avoid that area at all cost, cause' there's a big chance they could get shot.
tacticomp 3 years ago
whats shocking to me is i've talked to gun owners and people who are completely for gun rights, and i've heard good points mentioned that i've taken into consideration in forming a decision, yet you haven't mentioned any of those points which tell me you don't really know what you are talking about. i'd be up for having an adult conversation (big people talk) and hear more about your views, and i'd like to post some of my personal experiences that affect my opinion, PM me if your up for it.
2eak 3 years ago
Well if you talked to real gun owners, you'd probably become sensible by now and come to a realization that the right to self defense is an inalienable right, endowed by our creator, that no man or government can grant or take away.
tacticomp 3 years ago
it took you long enough...endowed by our creator? explain. if you need a month to come up with a response go ahead.
2eak 3 years ago
Now we really know the pathetic condition of our educational system--we can see the by product right here in 2weak brain.
As the wisdom of the Founding Founders declared in our Constitution,
Inalienable Right, such as the right to self defense, or say, Man's natural longing for Freedom and Liberty, is a right that was not granted by man, (and cannot be taken away by men)--but by our Creator. But if you're an Atheists, you probably would not know this.
tacticomp 3 years ago
google the word "liberty" before you start spouting what you think it means.
there is no logic in a debate on religion because it is a "faith" a "belief".
i could tell you that i believe in ghosts but how can you disprove it? you can't because its a belief. so what would be the point of me trying to rationalize and debate you on a belief?
this is my last response so soak it in.
its been fun, thanks for the jerry springer like entertainment but its become boring and repetetive. take care kid
2eak 3 years ago
lol. ok sorry next time i'll let you control what stats i can look up, my bad.
and those stats i took out of a high school library when i was looking up both sides of the debate, before i had formed any opinion.
they are probably old stats since i haven't been in high school in 8 years. so i'll admit that but don't scrutinize my information when you haven't posted one fact that backs up anything you say. if you want to actually talk about this as rational people and not act like a child pm me
2eak 3 years ago
That's really sad 2weak, you've been out of high school for 8 long years, and yet your IQ is still in the middle school level.
And if you honestly looked at both sides of the issue, (and resisted indoctrination by Liberal teachers), you don't actually need stats, all you need is simple common sense--If you disarm the law abiding citizens, they will be vulnerable to criminals who will not obey any laws (no kidding) and will have a hell of a heyday finding easy victims to rape and plunder.
tacticomp 3 years ago
liberal teachers? you have no clue where my opinions come from. i wasn't "taught" any sort of point of view. and you are starting to sound like a terrorist yourself with all this liberal conspiracy bullshit you are spewing. i came on this board to watch this video and saw that you were insulting people and comparing pencils to guns and i decided to interject because its a retarded example.
i didn't state i wanted to ban guns, i only stated that you cannot control people.
you took it from there
2eak 3 years ago
Let's revisit the phrase, "Watch what we do, not what we say" You claim to be "not a liberal" and yet, you hate guns and engage in 'blameism', blaming the object instead of the perpetrator.
You're "not for banning guns" and yet you highly espouse and defend the UK's gun control--citing its superficial 'benefits'.
Why hide your Liberal utopian beliefs?
My comparison is a sarcastic metaphor and a parody of the Liberal Lefts' twisted moronic worldview and It's not supposed to be literal, pinhead.
tacticomp 3 years ago
so by using sarcasm you were lieing in a sense? if i wasn't supposed to take the pencil analogy seriously then why use it? sarcasm is an exxageration, you cannot exxagerate an absolute. its either right or wrong. honestly drop the insecurity.
i'm about trying to find answers, you stated that guns have about as much impact on the murder rates in the country as a pencil am i wrong? obviously you spend too much time on using a vast amount of words yet you put little thought into the actual issue
2eak 3 years ago
Your diatribe above is really telling how pathetic your reading comprehension is.
I will put it up again so people will see how low your IQ level is.
Well duh..! if "guns kill people", then..
-pencils 'miss spel' words,
-cars make people drive drunk,
-Walmart made you stretch your dollars and buy cheap products, (it's human nature to save, while killing is not-got it?)
And last but not least, SPOONS MADE ROSIE O'DONNEL FAT!
Shows Loony Liberals thrives on emotions than analytical thinking.
tacticomp 3 years ago
thrive on emotions? lol, you are all over the place insulting and you have to mention rosi o'donnel in some inarticulate unfunny joke thats full of emotional hatred at those that disagree with you.
and again it amazes me that you have yet to bring up the most pivotal 2 arguments in the whole issue.
your a sad excuse for even fellow gun owners.
2eak 3 years ago
You failed to comprehend that it's not a comparison of those items with each other, it's the asinine concept of 'Blameism'-people not taking responsibilities anymore.
The sarcastic metaphor, or analogy (since that word is too heavy for your brain) were very clear
-that the person blames the pencil for his writing mistakes
-the drunk blames the car and 'made' him drive.
-that Walmart forces you to buy from them.
-that fat people blames the spoon for making them eat and gain weight.
tacticomp 3 years ago
and i just explained it to you via PM,
i understand your attempt at the analogy,
its just a sad analogy.
i asked a question regarding what the items were created for and it seems to have stifled you.
2eak 3 years ago
And the question was way off topic in the scheme of things. (Talk about diverting the issues). I was talking about human behavior and the rampant 'Blame game' the loony Liberals are consistently playing--to them there's always something or someone to blame, except those who actually did the despicable acts. Loony Liberals does not believe in consequences of one's own actions, or the sad reality of personal responsibility.
tacticomp 3 years ago
thats a stereotype.
think harder.
2eak 3 years ago
Responsibility and Accountability? a stereotype?
2weak seems to have lost it.
tacticomp 3 years ago
at least i had it at some point.
come on, it took you two weeks and this is all you have in response?
2eak 3 years ago
so you are blaming blameism? you have to see the hypocritical comedic value of that...come on, an lol? even though i voted democrat the last few elections for various reasons it doesn't mean i think they are the answer.
i don't like the 2 party system, with both parties having side agendas that exclude the people. this is why i hate stereotypes, accountability has always been important to me, i want harsher punishment for violent crimes, child abuse and neglect, rape, corporate crime....ect..
2eak 3 years ago
It really sad that a 25 year old, fresh from college (so you say) is so dumb to see the ironic, humorous sarcasm of this parody.
No wonder, you're whining for not making as much money like others your age--your boss probably noticed you're slow and had low IQ to comprehend simple things. And it shows, you can't seem to grasp my superb sarcastic analogy on 'Blameism' (I'm not using metaphor again, it might short circuit your 2weak brain). What a waste of College money.
tacticomp 3 years ago
a broken record.......
2eak 3 years ago
With your 2weakbrain, redundancy is a must.
So you can hopefully comprehend what's being discussed. It'll help you with your job too in making you understand things--your boss will thank me for that.
tacticomp 3 years ago
Read the parody again and stop being EMOTIONAL--so you can have better use of what's left of your 2weak brain
Better, I'll put it up again:
Well duh..! if "guns kill people", then..
-pencils 'miss spel' words,
-cars make people drive drunk,
-Walmart made you stretch your dollars and buy cheap products, (it's human nature to save, while killing is not-got it?)
And last but not least, SPOONS MADE ROSIE O'DONNEL FAT!
Shows Loony Liberals thrives on emotions han analytical thinking.
tacticomp 3 years ago
Gun owners loves me for that superb analogy and shooting down (pun intended) all of your typical anti-gun asinine arguments and liberal talking points.
Talk to the real life Gun Owners and not just those imaginary creations of "Gun Owners" in that 2weak brain of yours.
tacticomp 3 years ago
lol. thanks for the huge repetetive emotional outburst of insults in what 7 posts?
check mate my friend.
i'm sure you'll figure it out one day, once you are done with puberty you'll be able to control these outbursts a little better.
take care kid.
2eak 3 years ago
Checkmate my ass, your Queen have been gobbled up so many times that would make Karpov look like Fisher.
Wish that for yourself, 2weakabrain. After all that wasted college money you spent on your useless 'education' you still didn't get it.
tacticomp 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
thats the reaction i was looking for.
thanks for the parting gift, sometimes i write "lol" but its a true rarity that someone actually gets me to laugh out loud.
thank you
2eak 3 years ago
Psychologists say that mock laughter temporarily hides and erases the embarrassment caused by an opponent in a debate.
Thanks for "laughing" and subconsciously showing your disdain that you lost in this argument.
tacticomp 3 years ago
"police reports say a nutty right wing blow-hard was spotted trolling around youtube with what witnesses claim can only be a complete lack of maturity".. "when the perpetrater was confronted he began to wail in a high pitch bird-like sound described only as a "caw" of some sorts, he then began waving a gun around and making bizarre statements about loony liberal communist agendas, and sean hannity being the re-incarnation of christ".
viewers are warned to avoid feeding tacticomp any logic.
2eak 3 years ago
well tacti.. its been fun. but i'm going to move on. you are bat-fuck crazy, thanks for the financial information on how much money you have in your bank?? usually when i'm losing a debate i pull out my wallet?? athough i find it interesting that you took our private message debate back to the public,
i will not judge you. maybe your parents found out that you were talking to this "strange man" on that there private message machine and they began to worry.
anyways thanks for the laughs.
2eak 3 years ago
Checkmate!
tacticomp 3 years ago
the game was over long ago.. you've been playing with yourself for some time now.
it was fun watching at first, but eventually
i realised you don't just have different political views, you repeat shit borderline with those like timothy mcveigh and the unibomber. racism, sexism, you want liberals to be killed?...
there is no conscience on the other end of this computer screen. have your "check-mate"
you need it way more than me.
just see a counselor.
i'm being serious.
2eak 3 years ago
You're absolutely right,2weak--the game was over a long time ago when you pathetically didn't comprehend the parody of Liberal 'blameism' and accountability.
And espoused leftist demagogue, sucked up from their playbook. Here's a good advice: use your own brain and do some analytical thinking, and not suck up your opinions on moonbat talking points and soundbites.
tacticomp 3 years ago
on a side note, imitation is the greatest form of flattery. when i read "check mate"
it cracked me up.
thanks.
2eak 3 years ago
Here's a clear example of a Loony Liberal's delusions of grandeur--Loonies like 2weak think, she had exclusivity on words in the dictionary.
tacticomp 3 years ago
on a side note try replying with an actual answer to my question about the 2 best arguments gun owners have, or maybe what a gun was created for, or why the 2nd amendment exists,. i find it hard to believe someone would rather procreate with you than take their own life. maybe i should believe in miracles. i realize you aren't going to let me leave this argument. a toast to insecurity?
2eak 3 years ago
"loony liberals" and "2weak" together in the same rebuttle. dear lord..please start protesting at obama rallies, you are the exact kind of republican that will make obama supporters feel like intellectual gods. if i was ever going to be a comedian i'd definitely have you open for me. honestly are you even a real person? i've often wondered if you are a democrat disguised as a republican in hopes of making republicans look like fuckin idiots. please if this is a democrat let me in on it...
2eak 3 years ago
Face it 2weakbrain, you lost the argument the minute you psychobabbled OFF TOPIC and miserably failed to comprehend its very subject.
tacticomp 3 years ago
Washington DC, the murder capital of the USA, New York, Chicago, and other cities with the most restrictive gun control laws and outright ban on gun ownership, was the epitome of the failure of these Stalinist experiment. These cities have the highest crime stats in the nation, while those cities which protects it's citizens rights and had lax CCW statutes, are the exact opposite. Criminals are predators, the more defenseless you are, the better. Thanks to Libs like you 2weak. Felons loves you.
tacticomp 3 years ago
stalinist experiment? wtf, what kind of loon are you? and i'm not a liberal dumbass. women who carry a firearm with them have a 91% of having that gun used against them, not them even getting the chance to use it for protection. look up your facts dipshit.
2eak 3 years ago
2weak: "and i'm not a liberal dumbass"
You might not be a 'Liberal dumbass' but you sure are a Liberal Moonbat, laden with leftist Liberal platitudes and Socialist/Marxist ideology.
I can understand your shame, but why hide your Liberal worldview? - be proud of it! and join your other clueless surrogates in Hollywood.
tacticomp 3 years ago
When the young disturbed gunman tried to shoot people in a Colorado Christian Church, A volunteer woman with a concealed carry firearm confronted this crazy young man and stopped him cold from inflicting more casualties. So here's an idea, 2weak. To drastically lessen or even stop this and other forms of random violence from happening-Stop the assault on the rights of law abiding citizens to own a gun and defend themselves, since they are the only ones diligent enough to go that tedious process.
tacticomp 3 years ago
and what was he going to use in that church? a gun? exactly, in your world every human even children would have guns. i've had a gun pulled on me a couple different times and not even by criminals, but wacko's like yourself that are so insecure they need a firarm to feel like a man. again you need guns to protect yourself from other people who have guns? ironic isn't it? and again how does that lower gun violence? you've changed the subject on every question i've asked you.
2eak 3 years ago
Nice try, but it still doesn't really prove your lame argument-that an inanimate object could actually kill on it's own.
How many lunatic goes into church and massacre churchgoers? Once in a blue moon, and luckily, one person with foresight on eventualities like these was prepared, averting further tragedy. This incident actually proved my point on the right to self defense, and handily shot down your ignorant assertion that one's reason to own a gun are only for egoistic reasons, not survival.
tacticomp 3 years ago
Here's the bottom line 2weakbrain. I hope, that you'd get mugged by a scumbag thug whom you though wasn't responsible for his actions and blamed his tools instead.
Let's see how that will drastically change your perspective in the right of an individual to self defense, pinhead.
tacticomp 3 years ago
Looks like we have one thing in common.
The protection of our Freedom--specifically the 2nd amendment.
This 2weak pinhead's proclivity to dictate on the rest of us, is the quintessential Stalinist Liberalism. Who arrogantly thinks they are better than us and knows more than we do, on what to do with our lives, or what to own and not what to own.
tacticomp 3 years ago
I don't need you to speak for me, and I don't remember siding with you - I speak for myself. This is my stance. Take it or leave it.
I simply stated that violence is violence. Did I say that it's evil? No, unless you count self-defense as some sort of crime.
All I'm saying is that I don't mind public firearms ownership, provided that there are effective safeguards and that the said public has enough sense to only use their weapons only when absolutely necessary.
TwinSkies 3 years ago
So is Japan, The 'Yakusa' can buy it in the blackmarket from many sources, smuggle them, and make a profit on the side with their 'gunrunning' racket.
And Britain's is not far behind. If you just get up on your lazy ass and research. The Brits' gun crime rate is drastically going up due to the gun blackmarket, mostly supplied by the globally growing Russian mafia.
Like most peacenik moonbats, You're so naive on how the criminal mind works. Evil do exists, and will thrive, laws or no laws.
tacticomp 3 years ago
its "yakuza" dipshit.
and you are talking about gun violence going up? well then it must have been down before,
way to prove my point, and keep on failing to post any of the facts you keep calling me too lazy to look up. "evil do exists"? what like vampires? there are bad people out there, i'm not stupid, but show me any sort of statistic that shows where an increase in gun ownership has attributed to less gun violence? and don't show some town with 100 people in it as an example.
2eak 3 years ago
Your IQ level is that pathetic. the whole point there is that your touted, absolutist UK gun control didn't work, pinhead. Knives were being use extensively and guns for some time, but when Russia collapse in the late 80s, their various criminal enterprises exploded and shot up (pun intended) to unprecedented heights and gunrunning is now their lucrative business, and which also proves that your Stalinist gun free utopia is an utter failure, always been, always have.
tacticomp 3 years ago
stalinist? is stalin the only communist you've heard of? marx or lenin or anybody? i'm not communist but at least try to make your point without using extreme situations.
get your mouth off limbaugh's dick for a second and think about it.
2eak 3 years ago
You obviously don't know the history of the Joseph Stalin era. (oh Look! 2weak is googling!)
I'll give you a hint: 20 Millions brutally died during his reign. How?--since you're googling, find out how.
I noticed you have this preoccupation with saying "mouth on someone's dick"...hmmm, looks like you have some little secret that your parents don't know about, when your next door friend is having a sleep over.
Sigmund Freud was right after all. The subconscious mind (and mouth) can be revealing.
tacticomp 3 years ago