Four little words will stop all this nonsense, due process of law, make them prove it! Whether it's in divorce court or a criminal proceeding, only allow unbiased and procedurally correct evidence to be admitted. No hearsay, no I think,I believe or anything other than what would be allowed in a "non politically correct " case. Also work it the other way, if the evidence says a women committed a crime against a man, don't excuse it Again, follow all the rules of evidence.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judges are excpting bribes. California judges are employee's of the State not the County. The County is currently giving them $57,688.00 per yr per judge in addition to the pay and benefits they receive from the State. After being exposed for the bribes (Sturgeon v Los Angeles County) the judges paid a lobbyist to pass SBX211 granting the retro active imunity from prosecution. SBX211 does not address the loss of due proccess.
Four little words will stop all this nonsense, due process of law, make them prove it! Whether it's in divorce court or a criminal proceeding, only allow unbiased and procedurally correct evidence to be admitted. No hearsay, no I think,I believe or anything other than what would be allowed in a "non politically correct " case. Also work it the other way, if the evidence says a women committed a crime against a man, don't excuse it Again, follow all the rules of evidence.
unclefixer 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Los Angeles Superior Court Judges are excpting bribes. California judges are employee's of the State not the County. The County is currently giving them $57,688.00 per yr per judge in addition to the pay and benefits they receive from the State. After being exposed for the bribes (Sturgeon v Los Angeles County) the judges paid a lobbyist to pass SBX211 granting the retro active imunity from prosecution. SBX211 does not address the loss of due proccess.
(see) How To Disqualify Your Judge
danielcooper1000 11 months ago