Like a little garbage truck, flowing around looking for atherosclerosis to clean up. Sweet! Let's just hope it doesn't cause an inflammatory response in the endothelium. Also, this doesn't address the molecular debris after it's work is done (what goes in to the robot, has to come out in some form, unless it can defy the law of conservation of mass & energy). Will macrophages take care of it? Or will it just redeposit on vessel walls elsewhere?
giving us the abillity to fan them outside our bodies creating copies of our selves and making little tazers inside theim so we could shoot balls of electricity at stuff and also um make us immortal super strong super fast the abillity to make fire by them vibrating really fast and um and ice by slowing them down we could be everything we see in comic books and whose to say we cant technology is so advanced now the could be no limit to what cand be created
There are two reasons why I'm against "superlong" life: first of all there comes a time when you simply have seen it all. You would most probably get depressed as life isn't exciting anymore (on the other hand this could just be because older people can't do and feel the fun stuff of their young age).
Reason two is: we're already overpopulating the earth...it would make no sense to seemingly heal these people if they're gonna die of starvation or in an energy or water or food war.
Over population happens mainly in the third world. In highly industralize countries the problem is mainly underpopulation. People have babies much later in life & fewer of them. If given a choice most probably wouldnt want them screaming kids.
Societies & cultures are always changing & there are thousands of galaxies so I doubt one would have seen it all.
HEY CAN I USE THIS VIDEO FOR A PROJECT ON NANOTECHNOLOGY IF U WANT TO CHECK MY PROJECT OUT ITS shanenanotechnology.pbworks.com Please hurry because its due on wensday!!! thanks soo much...
for where had gone the yellow thing? In the end after the bot sucked everything, his inside whole was still empty and grey!! Those yellow athoms have to go to somewhere.
So what would happen if an electromagnetic pulse were to go off while these were in your body or you came in contact with a high level of electricity. Wouldn't these be fried in your body and cause great amounts of damage?
The reason death is so prevailant is because the body cannot sustain itself over extremely long periods of time. Nanomachines will make degeneration of body tissue a thing of the past. There will be no more disease, disorders, and other ailments. This is the ultimate cure that will preserve our lives for milleniums.
@jmario232 however in the disease area it will also be competing with new miRNA technologies. Perhaps they may be able to work synergistically especially in terms of cancers with miRNAs suppressing the cancer and nanobots being used to irradicate it.
Animals tearing other animals apart live. Animals eating animals from the inside out. Animals swallowing other animals alive. Animals slowing eating other animals piece by piece. Disease causing the limbs to fall off where the host is still alive. Disease eating the flesh off a still living host. Disease causing your brain and blood vessels to hemorage. etc etc.
@jmario232 But death is necessary, without it we would just keep reproducing and reproducing until the planet can no longer provide for everyone and then what? We would ether start to die out or move on the other worlds and continue the same trend... death is necessary.
I believe birth and death rates go hand in hand. High death rates lead to high birth rates just as low death rates lead to low birth rates. It all depends on health, standard of living, resources, etc. I find having people suffer to death to be a bad reason to control population especially considering there are other ways to manage and maintain it.
@jmario232 I know what you mean, but we do follow a constant evolution, if we do use nanotechnology, it might becore essetial for living in the future since our body's self-defence might dissapear throught the evolution, also we might get overpopulated. Disandvantages to everything my friend.
Overpopulation is a myth. The truth of it is that it indeed would stabilize if people live in a high standard of living and have near perfect health. If there is an increase we will tackle it in a more peaceful manner if the situation occurs. It is a good cause. Just look at how many elders are suffering in nursing homes. The government spends tons of money on the elderly and the amount of elders will only rise. If this is not solved by 2050 our economy will suffer.
@o0oD4n1so0o it may be to complicated now, but that doesnt mean it will always be that way. hell one day we may be able to make small machines that emulate the actually functions of a brain! the future progresses, and it frightening, but thats what makes it good, fear is a grand spice!
I want to live both longer and better. When I am 80+ years old I want to be active, productive, and healthy just like a young man. I feel that emerging medical technologies such as nanorobotics may hold the answer to increasing good standards of living in terms of bodily health.
@jmario232 in theory you should be able to look like you do before you get to 80 becouse if your cells dont age and stay in their prime forever then you live forever
@jmario232 There is a man in India who has not eaten for 70 years, he is healthy and doesn't afraid of science checking him out, it is the real deal. A chinese man - Li Ching-Yun - lived to the age of 256 years old, healthy, before dying peacefully. The cause of disease is ignorance in knowing who one is and how one can control the body. Science is maturing, but isn't there yet.
Isn't that guy a hoax? I looked up videos of him and I could not find anything on Li Ching Yun. I am assuming he is fake. Can you show me where I can find info on this guy?
@jmario232 That's nice and all. However when you make cures like that, you can also create weapons.
People can create nanobots that can act like viruses, which can behave and be more destructive than any virus known to date. Google "Grey Goo" to see an extreme example.
That nanobot looks like a spaceship lol maybe on a larger scale it could be used for sucking up asteroids and then the asteroids would be probed for minerals.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this is isn't nanobot...this is stupid!...nanobots are weapons to fight ghost!..just go type ghostx and you will see.assholes..if you wanna make a NANOBOT,make a lil bit better.stealing a name like that.what selfish basterd would do that.
You guys really think that our world's leaders (especially the NWO scumbags) and big pharma are going to HELP the public with nano bots? You really think they want the masses disease-free? Please.
I hate to be pessimestic about this but I see this only benefiting the filthy rich.
How old are you? Like 14? There are endless problems in this world. As soon as 1 is solved 10 more arises out of it. How do you think we came this far? We are nowhere near any kind of plateau and profits can only be made with products and services. No real profit will be made by government fundings for research. This is what makes pioneers great. And once someone or something pioneers in a particular market, they will be known for all of history.
Like I said, I see ONLY THE FILTHY RICH benefiting from this. If you've been paying attention to all of the corruption the past 10 years, then you would understand where I'm coming from. Instead, you rant on about pioneers and 'history' . So do tell us what happens when the ownership of this technology gets into the wrong hands then.
You don't seem to understand how business works. I don't understand if you are trying to say that only the rich get richer, or the technology is being developed and will only be available to the select few who can afford its premium. Listen here. Just as you don't have to buy name brand products. You do not have to buy "name brand' medical treatment. Companies charge high prices to get back the money spent on R&D. Generic labels can benefit by offering the same stuff at lower prices.
to your comment on high blood pressure, the high blood pressure is one of the many causes of clogged arteries, so the nanobots could hypothetically latch ontot he deposits of fat and break them apart.
I'm not refering to clog arteries. I was refering to the technical problems of very high blood pressure preventing a nanobot from moving in such an environment. Its like putting a nanobot in a blender and trying to get it to move opposit of the strong flow current.
If the techno. problems arnt discuss how can we expect to over come them? Thats its importatnt to discuss them so we can have solutions.
Well the nanobot could also use the high blood pressure to move faster, thus saving any energy it would need to move, and if the nanobots where inserted into the blood stream ahead of the clogged artery, then it would still be forced towards the clog, what would be the use of swimming against the current. just follor the arteries to where the target areas are.
I could see it helping. It also depends on where the clogged artery is. If its something like 'plaque' in the brain obviously one cant just shove a needle in the brain and inject the nanobots. Or treating cancer tumours in certain difficult to reach regions of the body.
Part fo the technical difficutlies is that there are thousands of microarteries. Its a like a giant maize. Trying to navigate within the body is going to be challenge. Finding the right artery to the right location is going to be difficult.
i saw this BRIFLY covered on CNN one day .about middle of day when everybody is usually at work.they are suppose to be ready for use within the decade.they are for cleaning plaque out of arteries.but just imagine the many other uses!
But yes hackers can and most likely would hack the nanobots, but as i said unless the blt had the specialized equipment built in to send nerve signals i highly doubt hackers would have any reason to hack cholesterol cleaning nanobots, unless they wanted to like disable them and make the person die from a clogged artery..Which would happen over a long period of time.
@16SKB Though its still like the A.I.'s we promise. We say/think well have it very soon, and yet we don't. for 40 years now people went "in 5 years, robots will be doing everything for us!" Lol..
I personally think well have nanobots themselves in about 70 years, and the AI's in 150.
If the purposed nanobots have no outside communication, and use the nervous system to relay information between each other like any normal cell then a hacker couldnt control them.
Its already a far fetched idea, the thought of someone assuming control over them is something out of a sci fi movie, and only a little ridiculous lol.
Now often times projects such like these are funded by private funds and large corporations, the governement would only fund it if it had a advantage for say national secuirty or advances to say "conqour" the rest of the world, as most paranoid people beleive we will do eventually.
Mastered: So you are correct in that it does have a self employed biomechanism "endless".
The ATP [energy] in the cell would be the "powerplant" of the Cell. Energy PRoduction "endless".
Furthermore, it can enter the human body. Yes, it can. And can be tracked through Imaging infrared or Scanning Body devices to "track" progress and "find" these nano's.
Imagine what great danger. Now someone else, with access to these Nanos Controls your every Move, and THOUGHT, owning ur Body [LiFE]!
haha ok so the nanobot can indeed use the bodies resources to create energy, as for the matter of a nanobot taking control of your body? well they can always have one specified program, with other security programs to stop the htreat of it being reprogrammed.
They have practically ENDLESS supply of ATP. Can you imagine?. About the Programming Stoppage what have you sounds "FEASIBLE" and "RECOMMENDABLE" of course.
What about hackers? or IBM can they OVERRIDE THESE? I'm sure they would be able to. Either way, I do not trust anything that comes out of the Governments hands are you kidding me.
Anything they possibly put their hands on its got a "double" sword edge to it. Unfortunately, hindering right techonological advance
Well in todays day and age hackers are big threats, but i mean in order for the nanobot to be able to control a person there would have to be specialized parts built into the nano bot say a mechanism to emit electroni pusles tot he nerves,or to your brain directly, after all that is how our cns works, we need the eletric pulses from our brain to control our bodies, now a nanobot built to soley clear away blood pathways of fat would unlikely contain such mechanisms, so there is the other side.
they can always program the nanobots to tak ein the fat and somehow through biomechanics use the fat and convert it into useable energy to function, fat contains energy so if they are able to somehow make the robot take in the fat and convert it they can save on energy sources.
Mastered. The part of employing its own "Usable Energy".
Somewhere If I can remember correctly. They use something in the body, not sure specifically what [lipids, fats? glucose, ?]
The concept is this in cellular biology aspect, actually it does this, acts as a CELL.
The Nano-bot makes its own ATP and has capabilities of acting like your cell wall, and the same capabilities of a Nucleus of a cell, basically filtering, packaging, transporting, and Converting all for the ATP PRODUCTION
see the problem with this is were does the excess fat build up go when the robot takes it in[me and some of my Biotech friends are working on diagrams of the things to try to figure it out we were contemplating making them self-destruct but it may cause internal injury], It cant eject it out of the small intestine or the blood cells will just take it back in lol.
wouldnt they just break the fat down into smaller molecules so then the body can absorb it or just let it flow without it blocking up the blood vessel again.
I dont think they get rid of it, just suck it up, chew it up a bit then pass it on.
I'm drinking Natty-lights and listening to Twin Peaks theme song to this video while dreaming of nano-bots that are all over my body. But how can I know if they are gone? I have washed and scrubed my face and hands with brillo pads to get rid of the micro-scopic robots until I bleed. But how do I know if the nano-bots have been killed by the soap? I can't see them under my microscope either. Please send ideas and don't be afraid of me in my mask on The Vortex Zone.
Dood... Give them candy and they will go away. I always rub melted sucker on my chest. Its fun to lick it off too. I just take my finger, rub and lick. I hate it when it gets in my nails though. WAIT MY NAILS! Oh NO! What if... What if... They are under my finger nails... HELP! Candy cant save me there.
We can only create what we imagine, and it has been like this forever. The air plane, the telephone, the space shuttle. All this started as just pictures, diagrams, dreams and myths until we developed the technology to make it. There will be nanomachines in this lifetime or the next, get over it.
look can everyone please open your eyes to what nano technology is bieng used for right now. please type in "strange days strange skies" on your explorer and go to the site. pass it on to your familys.
would have just put the link in but pootube dont like it. i wonder why??? for my child i'll be a hater. screw hater, hurt my boy an i will fuckin destroy you. by any means neccessary. I am a mother. if you have children you must see the site.
you know, if someone wants to hurt your boy you basically just told them to kill you first. never show your soft side. you'll just get fucked over.
in response to video and ongoing discussion about the 'bots: nanotech is not as primitive as people would have us believe. tiny robots may be some ways off but there have already been leaps and bounds in designing proteins to specific purposes.
@Sol17Opacus soft???? where did i show my soft side? i said i will fucking kill anyfuckingthing or one who is a threat to my child. where he get soft from.......fuck it
"amazing, so when r nanbots going to replacedrugs?" Never. Anyone who believes this is possible with today's technology is dreaming. Decades away, a century most likely if its even possible at all.
"How would you control it?" You can't, they wouldn't function like a normal computer device. Its all got to be based on designed chemical reactions because there just isn't the computer tech or storage space to do it at that scale without significant size increase.
I'm not a hater, I'm a realist. I do Nanoresearch for a living and I always get a bit frustrated when the sci-fi junkies run amok with the ideas of nanotech. These videos are artists conceptions of the far future, not fact.
belive me or not, nanotechnology started already in the 60s, and some nanotechnology will be used in the range of 5-7 years. Nanotechnology will be a reality at the end of the 20s..
well without such artist conceptions and projected outcomes and such i doubt you'd have the funds to do your research. investors want solutions, not undirected theory.
Yes, we will be dead. I don't think it will happen so soon - contrary to the opinions of some crackpot "futurists" like Ray Kurzweil.
Then again, we were supposed to have lifespans of 400 by now according to Robert Anton Wilson in his essay "Next Stop: Immortality" published in Future Magazine, November 1978.
@lonecretin we dont have that lifespan but a group of 12 people do have. u must have heard of them. they are responsible for the spraying of the skies worldwide. look out your window now to see it if u havent already noticed. (note,clouds do NOT have straight edges!!)
i dont think its true because if we can shapeshift there will be many murders and robbing cuzz the thief or murderer may change his identity as soon as he murdurers someone
They are printed, using basically the same process in which circuit boards are printed. I don't own the machines (WAY too expensive), but was able to use them through a proff at school.
There are ways to make little motors, gears, lifts (screw motor attached to a lever arm), etc. MEMS (not reall 'nano') seems to mostly be used at the moment for sensors (like the accelerometer on the Wii-motes), but you can make some interesting things (Ex: a friend of mine made a tinny little 8-'legged' 'robot' that has joints that can contract with extremely minute temperature changes ... so it manages to walk (perhaps more like stumble) forward in most environments :)
They are simply mechanical structures, and no more living than a car transmission. I have seen a few that had basic logic elements built in, but even the most symplistic calculator usually dwarfs their capabilities in that regard ... I hesitate to even call any of them robots, but that is a very loose term.
I doubt that anything this small could ever have thoughts (atoms are simply too big), but it could consist of organic parts I guess (when is something 'living' anyway). Enzimes and other protines, along with simple mechanical movements, could allow it to attach to and remove something once it bumps into it, but I don't think they would be able to activily persue something (basically a man-made white blood cell, but designed to remove cholesterol)
For this to happen in the next 30 years requires a legion of primitive nanobots swimming around in a petri dish in a lab somewhere - already. In 30 years I bet we wouldn't have gotten around sticking two atoms together.
You're joking right? Nanotech is already here. We've allready built super-strong nanotubes, nanomotors and possibly some other stuff. Now it's a matter of developing and refining the technology in terms of the applications we want to use it for.
a hundred years is about right-strictly speaking this image displayed here would not even be a nanobot: red blood cells have ~7 micrometers in diameter
some really good stuff here
bribribri56 1 week ago
love the video man
rodswebdesign 1 week ago
Like a little garbage truck, flowing around looking for atherosclerosis to clean up. Sweet! Let's just hope it doesn't cause an inflammatory response in the endothelium. Also, this doesn't address the molecular debris after it's work is done (what goes in to the robot, has to come out in some form, unless it can defy the law of conservation of mass & energy). Will macrophages take care of it? Or will it just redeposit on vessel walls elsewhere?
rmcdaniel423 4 months ago
Awsome
l
v
jmario232 5 months ago
giving us the abillity to fan them outside our bodies creating copies of our selves and making little tazers inside theim so we could shoot balls of electricity at stuff and also um make us immortal super strong super fast the abillity to make fire by them vibrating really fast and um and ice by slowing them down we could be everything we see in comic books and whose to say we cant technology is so advanced now the could be no limit to what cand be created
kangodarkblade 6 months ago
i may sound like a complete retard but if these thing could bond and reproduce couldnt we become a race of super people
kangodarkblade 6 months ago
maybe they should experiment on themselves
edtthx11557 10 months ago
There are two reasons why I'm against "superlong" life: first of all there comes a time when you simply have seen it all. You would most probably get depressed as life isn't exciting anymore (on the other hand this could just be because older people can't do and feel the fun stuff of their young age).
Reason two is: we're already overpopulating the earth...it would make no sense to seemingly heal these people if they're gonna die of starvation or in an energy or water or food war.
DeFraans 10 months ago
@DeFraans
Over population happens mainly in the third world. In highly industralize countries the problem is mainly underpopulation. People have babies much later in life & fewer of them. If given a choice most probably wouldnt want them screaming kids.
Societies & cultures are always changing & there are thousands of galaxies so I doubt one would have seen it all.
1NX9 10 months ago
Now that is just cool!!
npsheth978 11 months ago
HEY PLEASE RESPOND I REALLY NEED!!!!
10shane 1 year ago
@10shane Why didn't you just go ahead and use it? It was only a private school project, yes?
Aphradonis 11 months ago
@Aphradonis because it took this dude 10 billion years to respond...
10shane 10 months ago
@10shane I meant that I wouldn't've asked in the first place lol.
Aphradonis 10 months ago
HEY CAN I USE THIS VIDEO FOR A PROJECT ON NANOTECHNOLOGY IF U WANT TO CHECK MY PROJECT OUT ITS shanenanotechnology.pbworks.com Please hurry because its due on wensday!!! thanks soo much...
10shane 1 year ago
@10shane How do you want to use it, exactly? You wish to purchase a usage license?
PhilipVN 1 year ago
@PhilipVN Haha, Philippe, he just wanted to use it for a school project; I doubt he was interested in licensing it!
Aphradonis 11 months ago
Ya, sure, anything to make us live longer. We need to let the elite know, because they want to decrease the population.
forgiven61 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what happens when they become full?
whitelandwarriors08 1 year ago
for where had gone the yellow thing? In the end after the bot sucked everything, his inside whole was still empty and grey!! Those yellow athoms have to go to somewhere.
fernator5 1 year ago
now if only we supersize it to suck up justin beber
MEGA93M 1 year ago 3
not only o the govt monitor your every move, now they want to monitor everything that goes on inside u..!
SovereignBeing 1 year ago
So what would happen if an electromagnetic pulse were to go off while these were in your body or you came in contact with a high level of electricity. Wouldn't these be fried in your body and cause great amounts of damage?
a11theabove 1 year ago
@a11theabove
They would proabably just self distruct. They be pretty much harmless afterwards.
1NX9 1 year ago
Programmable nanobots are still quite a few years away. These really are just purpose-made virii, which is still amazingly cool...
AliasUndercover 1 year ago
The reason death is so prevailant is because the body cannot sustain itself over extremely long periods of time. Nanomachines will make degeneration of body tissue a thing of the past. There will be no more disease, disorders, and other ailments. This is the ultimate cure that will preserve our lives for milleniums.
jmario232 1 year ago 20
@jmario232 yeah and because of that the earth will be overpopulated and overpoluted
manyakols9 1 year ago
@jmario232 however in the disease area it will also be competing with new miRNA technologies. Perhaps they may be able to work synergistically especially in terms of cancers with miRNAs suppressing the cancer and nanobots being used to irradicate it.
LostLikeEvergreen 11 months ago
@jmario232 Yeah, well you sound like a mad scientist that hates nature and wants to turn everyone into cybermen.
MEareCAT 10 months ago
@MEareCAT
Nature can be also extremely brutal.
Animals tearing other animals apart live. Animals eating animals from the inside out. Animals swallowing other animals alive. Animals slowing eating other animals piece by piece. Disease causing the limbs to fall off where the host is still alive. Disease eating the flesh off a still living host. Disease causing your brain and blood vessels to hemorage. etc etc.
Good that we have modern medicine me think.
1NX9 10 months ago
@jmario232 yea sure
edtthx11557 10 months ago
@jmario232 But death is necessary, without it we would just keep reproducing and reproducing until the planet can no longer provide for everyone and then what? We would ether start to die out or move on the other worlds and continue the same trend... death is necessary.
epicnessinacan 10 months ago
Comment removed
jmario232 10 months ago
@epicnessinacan
I believe birth and death rates go hand in hand. High death rates lead to high birth rates just as low death rates lead to low birth rates. It all depends on health, standard of living, resources, etc. I find having people suffer to death to be a bad reason to control population especially considering there are other ways to manage and maintain it.
jmario232 10 months ago
@jmario232 I know what you mean, but we do follow a constant evolution, if we do use nanotechnology, it might becore essetial for living in the future since our body's self-defence might dissapear throught the evolution, also we might get overpopulated. Disandvantages to everything my friend.
darkbladesx5 9 months ago
@darkbladesx5
Overpopulation is a myth. The truth of it is that it indeed would stabilize if people live in a high standard of living and have near perfect health. If there is an increase we will tackle it in a more peaceful manner if the situation occurs. It is a good cause. Just look at how many elders are suffering in nursing homes. The government spends tons of money on the elderly and the amount of elders will only rise. If this is not solved by 2050 our economy will suffer.
jmario232 9 months ago
@jmario232 Wrong... You can't "cure" any brain diseases with nanorobots because simply its too complex for a thing to do.
o0oD4n1so0o 9 months ago
@o0oD4n1so0o it may be to complicated now, but that doesnt mean it will always be that way. hell one day we may be able to make small machines that emulate the actually functions of a brain! the future progresses, and it frightening, but thats what makes it good, fear is a grand spice!
ramblinevilmushroom 9 months ago
@jmario232 I dont really think this is a good thing...Except that it will cure disease. I am against living too long but living better is fine.
mat967 6 months ago
@mat967
That's okay. You do not have to have these treatments if you don't want to.
jmario232 6 months ago
@mat967
I want to live both longer and better. When I am 80+ years old I want to be active, productive, and healthy just like a young man. I feel that emerging medical technologies such as nanorobotics may hold the answer to increasing good standards of living in terms of bodily health.
jmario232 6 months ago
@jmario232 in theory you should be able to look like you do before you get to 80 becouse if your cells dont age and stay in their prime forever then you live forever
kangodarkblade 6 months ago
@jmario232 There is a man in India who has not eaten for 70 years, he is healthy and doesn't afraid of science checking him out, it is the real deal. A chinese man - Li Ching-Yun - lived to the age of 256 years old, healthy, before dying peacefully. The cause of disease is ignorance in knowing who one is and how one can control the body. Science is maturing, but isn't there yet.
TheOneAndOnlyMichel 2 months ago
@TheOneAndOnlyMichel
Isn't that guy a hoax? I looked up videos of him and I could not find anything on Li Ching Yun. I am assuming he is fake. Can you show me where I can find info on this guy?
jmario232 2 months ago
@jmario232 That's nice and all. However when you make cures like that, you can also create weapons.
People can create nanobots that can act like viruses, which can behave and be more destructive than any virus known to date. Google "Grey Goo" to see an extreme example.
Thaylog456 2 months ago
Comment removed
jmario232 1 year ago
though this is proven,to be effective against myocardial infraction lot has to done on the biodegradability of these nanoparticles.
after all human body is not as simple as 3d animation.....
chiruprakash 1 year ago
What them bots can do lol, are they also canbe bad for us?
lay4life 1 year ago
Love it never have to diet again!! Armies of nanobots cleaning the fat and grease out of my vains!! Yeah FAST FOODS FOREVER!!
Lucifersetusfree 1 year ago
It like a nano size vaccum...hope this nanotechnology won't drop into a wrong hand...
tomlow777 1 year ago 3
That nanobot looks like a spaceship lol maybe on a larger scale it could be used for sucking up asteroids and then the asteroids would be probed for minerals.
EricNyhmfan 1 year ago
I think that nanorobot was vacuuming the arterial plaque that clogs arteries and gives heart attacks.
EgaoNoGenki 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is isn't nanobot...this is stupid!...nanobots are weapons to fight ghost!..just go type ghostx and you will see.assholes..if you wanna make a NANOBOT,make a lil bit better.stealing a name like that.what selfish basterd would do that.
getbored00666 2 years ago
Im thinking Cryonics here...........
DK0526 2 years ago
You guys really think that our world's leaders (especially the NWO scumbags) and big pharma are going to HELP the public with nano bots? You really think they want the masses disease-free? Please.
I hate to be pessimestic about this but I see this only benefiting the filthy rich.
tg112001 2 years ago
@tg112001
How old are you? Like 14? There are endless problems in this world. As soon as 1 is solved 10 more arises out of it. How do you think we came this far? We are nowhere near any kind of plateau and profits can only be made with products and services. No real profit will be made by government fundings for research. This is what makes pioneers great. And once someone or something pioneers in a particular market, they will be known for all of history.
factionxvt408x 2 years ago
@ factionsheep408
Like I said, I see ONLY THE FILTHY RICH benefiting from this. If you've been paying attention to all of the corruption the past 10 years, then you would understand where I'm coming from. Instead, you rant on about pioneers and 'history' . So do tell us what happens when the ownership of this technology gets into the wrong hands then.
tg112001 2 years ago
You don't seem to understand how business works. I don't understand if you are trying to say that only the rich get richer, or the technology is being developed and will only be available to the select few who can afford its premium. Listen here. Just as you don't have to buy name brand products. You do not have to buy "name brand' medical treatment. Companies charge high prices to get back the money spent on R&D. Generic labels can benefit by offering the same stuff at lower prices.
factionxvt408x 2 years ago
this could cause a zombie acoplypse
kaandogan12 2 years ago
weird and it looks like a traffic
Nanobots : Construction Workers
Blood Cells : Cars
adliikhwan280 2 years ago
eh i don't need no nanobots 1 malfunction u could die
tool000123 2 years ago
NOW I can eat all the burgers I want without the artery clogging. :D
NOM NOM NOM!
NaziCheese 2 years ago 2
lol u will still gain a bunch of weight
Drsatan9 2 years ago
Next step? Miniaturized people flowing through robot blood!
danbison 2 years ago 6
ON SALE AT THE NANO BOT SHOP. warranty will not be give use at your own risk, made in china and mexico
banzaimotorcross 2 years ago
I think I need some nanobots right now, so where can I get it.
LASTMAN024 2 years ago
wooooooooooo!!!
dozakhi 2 years ago
It reminds me of the 1966 mvie "Fantastic Voyage".
Traveling through the human body.
Jenfucius 2 years ago
to your comment on high blood pressure, the high blood pressure is one of the many causes of clogged arteries, so the nanobots could hypothetically latch ontot he deposits of fat and break them apart.
Mastered4Elements 2 years ago
I'm not refering to clog arteries. I was refering to the technical problems of very high blood pressure preventing a nanobot from moving in such an environment. Its like putting a nanobot in a blender and trying to get it to move opposit of the strong flow current.
If the techno. problems arnt discuss how can we expect to over come them? Thats its importatnt to discuss them so we can have solutions.
Jenfucius 2 years ago
Well the nanobot could also use the high blood pressure to move faster, thus saving any energy it would need to move, and if the nanobots where inserted into the blood stream ahead of the clogged artery, then it would still be forced towards the clog, what would be the use of swimming against the current. just follor the arteries to where the target areas are.
Mastered4Elements 2 years ago
I could see it helping. It also depends on where the clogged artery is. If its something like 'plaque' in the brain obviously one cant just shove a needle in the brain and inject the nanobots. Or treating cancer tumours in certain difficult to reach regions of the body.
Jenfucius 2 years ago
Part fo the technical difficutlies is that there are thousands of microarteries. Its a like a giant maize. Trying to navigate within the body is going to be challenge. Finding the right artery to the right location is going to be difficult.
Jenfucius 2 years ago
Ever go kayaking in turbulent waters. You dont always end up where you want to go.
Jenfucius 2 years ago
I wonder if nanobots are powerful enough to swim through high pressure blood vessels?
It would be a medical break through unprecidented if this comes a reality.
Cure for all diseases.
Jenfucius 2 years ago
i saw this BRIFLY covered on CNN one day .about middle of day when everybody is usually at work.they are suppose to be ready for use within the decade.they are for cleaning plaque out of arteries.but just imagine the many other uses!
vlcboleman 2 years ago
Lower your colesterol levels with NANOBOTS.... I can already see the advertisements
macca1088 2 years ago 3
son parecidos a nanobots!!!!!!!!!!!! jajajaj
caroymel 2 years ago
This is how some of you who are watching this now might live forever.
hellomate639 2 years ago
now dont forget to follow the fabricated flag and go run to the clue to take your flu vaccine.......
mistresspav 2 years ago
This come with chemtrails?
FreeIndividua 2 years ago
But yes hackers can and most likely would hack the nanobots, but as i said unless the blt had the specialized equipment built in to send nerve signals i highly doubt hackers would have any reason to hack cholesterol cleaning nanobots, unless they wanted to like disable them and make the person die from a clogged artery..Which would happen over a long period of time.
Mastered4Elements 2 years ago
If they wanted to kill someone it would be easier to use decapitation.
Interleap 2 years ago
nanobots can't be reprogrammed through hacking because their programming lies in their stucture and not in a memory chip
16SKB 2 years ago 24
agreed, but seriously, what would be the point of hacking a nanobot made for clearing cholesterol anyways, no benefits :)
Mastered4Elements 2 years ago
@16SKB Like a virus!
Digiscat 7 months ago
@Digiscat Yup. I totally forgot about this vid. And two years have passed. We're getting closer and closer!
16SKB 7 months ago
@16SKB Though its still like the A.I.'s we promise. We say/think well have it very soon, and yet we don't. for 40 years now people went "in 5 years, robots will be doing everything for us!" Lol..
I personally think well have nanobots themselves in about 70 years, and the AI's in 150.
Digiscat 7 months ago
@Digiscat Before you say that, realise what we've achieved in the last 30 years.
MusicalTalent1234 6 months ago
@MusicalTalent1234 And why don't you realize what the idiotic humans keep expecting DUE to that?
Digiscat 6 months ago
@16SKB Nanobots are chips by themselves. You are close but not accurate. Good stuff.
rajusman 5 months ago
If the purposed nanobots have no outside communication, and use the nervous system to relay information between each other like any normal cell then a hacker couldnt control them.
Its already a far fetched idea, the thought of someone assuming control over them is something out of a sci fi movie, and only a little ridiculous lol.
ProductEgo 2 years ago
lol ok so we'll end this with, no one would hack a nano bot period =P
Mastered4Elements 2 years ago
Now often times projects such like these are funded by private funds and large corporations, the governement would only fund it if it had a advantage for say national secuirty or advances to say "conqour" the rest of the world, as most paranoid people beleive we will do eventually.
Mastered4Elements 2 years ago
Mastered: So you are correct in that it does have a self employed biomechanism "endless".
The ATP [energy] in the cell would be the "powerplant" of the Cell. Energy PRoduction "endless".
Furthermore, it can enter the human body. Yes, it can. And can be tracked through Imaging infrared or Scanning Body devices to "track" progress and "find" these nano's.
Imagine what great danger. Now someone else, with access to these Nanos Controls your every Move, and THOUGHT, owning ur Body [LiFE]!
TheGodOftheLiving 2 years ago
haha ok so the nanobot can indeed use the bodies resources to create energy, as for the matter of a nanobot taking control of your body? well they can always have one specified program, with other security programs to stop the htreat of it being reprogrammed.
Mastered4Elements 2 years ago
YOU WERE CORRECT!
They have practically ENDLESS supply of ATP. Can you imagine?. About the Programming Stoppage what have you sounds "FEASIBLE" and "RECOMMENDABLE" of course.
What about hackers? or IBM can they OVERRIDE THESE? I'm sure they would be able to. Either way, I do not trust anything that comes out of the Governments hands are you kidding me.
Anything they possibly put their hands on its got a "double" sword edge to it. Unfortunately, hindering right techonological advance
TheGodOftheLiving 2 years ago
Well in todays day and age hackers are big threats, but i mean in order for the nanobot to be able to control a person there would have to be specialized parts built into the nano bot say a mechanism to emit electroni pusles tot he nerves,or to your brain directly, after all that is how our cns works, we need the eletric pulses from our brain to control our bodies, now a nanobot built to soley clear away blood pathways of fat would unlikely contain such mechanisms, so there is the other side.
Mastered4Elements 2 years ago
they can always program the nanobots to tak ein the fat and somehow through biomechanics use the fat and convert it into useable energy to function, fat contains energy so if they are able to somehow make the robot take in the fat and convert it they can save on energy sources.
Mastered4Elements 3 years ago
Mastered. The part of employing its own "Usable Energy".
Somewhere If I can remember correctly. They use something in the body, not sure specifically what [lipids, fats? glucose, ?]
The concept is this in cellular biology aspect, actually it does this, acts as a CELL.
The Nano-bot makes its own ATP and has capabilities of acting like your cell wall, and the same capabilities of a Nucleus of a cell, basically filtering, packaging, transporting, and Converting all for the ATP PRODUCTION
TheGodOftheLiving 2 years ago
it looks all cool but isnt the nanobot going against the established laws of nature? how will the nanobot be made to counter?
Darkwolfy88 3 years ago
what u mean ??
hiddentech 3 years ago
stds mostly haha.. abortions lmao .. lil murder bots .. dam..
ihypno 2 years ago
How much will they extend our lifespan?
Xetrez 3 years ago
@Xetrez
Infinitly. At least that is what people are going for. Considering rapid advancement in this field you might get yours in the future =).
jmario232 1 year ago
oh great, a machine has to do the work you're supposed to.
gregtestagent 3 years ago
ok,we got nano bots.even an energy drink.how about a drink that destroys nano bots?
online1tripleray420 3 years ago
see the problem with this is were does the excess fat build up go when the robot takes it in[me and some of my Biotech friends are working on diagrams of the things to try to figure it out we were contemplating making them self-destruct but it may cause internal injury], It cant eject it out of the small intestine or the blood cells will just take it back in lol.
URAFWingCommand 3 years ago
wouldnt they just break the fat down into smaller molecules so then the body can absorb it or just let it flow without it blocking up the blood vessel again.
I dont think they get rid of it, just suck it up, chew it up a bit then pass it on.
Yet again im not really sure.
himself000 3 years ago 2
Natural breakdown after prolonged use causes lymphocytes to destroy them. ...Then you go back to being mortal.
emceay 2 years ago
Nanobots Energy drink.
Automatizes your body!!
mtpjnk 3 years ago
Nanobots Energy drink, automatizes your body!!!! buy soon in a store next to you.
mtpjnk 3 years ago
8D.....=)??
pablokabron 3 years ago
I'm drinking Natty-lights and listening to Twin Peaks theme song to this video while dreaming of nano-bots that are all over my body. But how can I know if they are gone? I have washed and scrubed my face and hands with brillo pads to get rid of the micro-scopic robots until I bleed. But how do I know if the nano-bots have been killed by the soap? I can't see them under my microscope either. Please send ideas and don't be afraid of me in my mask on The Vortex Zone.
thevortexzone 3 years ago
Dood... Give them candy and they will go away. I always rub melted sucker on my chest. Its fun to lick it off too. I just take my finger, rub and lick. I hate it when it gets in my nails though. WAIT MY NAILS! Oh NO! What if... What if... They are under my finger nails... HELP! Candy cant save me there.
bennybytes 3 years ago
We can only create what we imagine, and it has been like this forever. The air plane, the telephone, the space shuttle. All this started as just pictures, diagrams, dreams and myths until we developed the technology to make it. There will be nanomachines in this lifetime or the next, get over it.
zivzak 3 years ago
Then. after that evil invention comes.
reavin21 3 years ago
LOL Good point.. For what ever we invent to help some one will invent a way to hurt. More money in the hurt field.. YOu don't pay taxes.
cosmo1pug 3 years ago
always a positive and a negative...
RidiculousRey 3 years ago
look can everyone please open your eyes to what nano technology is bieng used for right now. please type in "strange days strange skies" on your explorer and go to the site. pass it on to your familys.
would have just put the link in but pootube dont like it. i wonder why??? for my child i'll be a hater. screw hater, hurt my boy an i will fuckin destroy you. by any means neccessary. I am a mother. if you have children you must see the site.
knowledge is king
xxonelovexx
xxlisafallonxx 3 years ago
you know, if someone wants to hurt your boy you basically just told them to kill you first. never show your soft side. you'll just get fucked over.
in response to video and ongoing discussion about the 'bots: nanotech is not as primitive as people would have us believe. tiny robots may be some ways off but there have already been leaps and bounds in designing proteins to specific purposes.
Sol17Opacus 3 years ago
@Sol17Opacus soft???? where did i show my soft side? i said i will fucking kill anyfuckingthing or one who is a threat to my child. where he get soft from.......fuck it
xxlisafallonxx 1 year ago
lol cute.
chewyshoey 3 years ago
"amazing, so when r nanbots going to replacedrugs?" Never. Anyone who believes this is possible with today's technology is dreaming. Decades away, a century most likely if its even possible at all.
"How would you control it?" You can't, they wouldn't function like a normal computer device. Its all got to be based on designed chemical reactions because there just isn't the computer tech or storage space to do it at that scale without significant size increase.
NanoTekkie 3 years ago
Hater
BACON2369 3 years ago
He's not a hater, he's well informed.
iggy4323 3 years ago
Haters stick together. Next you'll tell us that "pixie dust" has nothing to do with stem cells.
BACON2369 3 years ago
I'm not a hater, I'm a realist. I do Nanoresearch for a living and I always get a bit frustrated when the sci-fi junkies run amok with the ideas of nanotech. These videos are artists conceptions of the far future, not fact.
NanoTekkie 3 years ago
belive me or not, nanotechnology started already in the 60s, and some nanotechnology will be used in the range of 5-7 years. Nanotechnology will be a reality at the end of the 20s..
max10wonderboy 3 years ago 2
well without such artist conceptions and projected outcomes and such i doubt you'd have the funds to do your research. investors want solutions, not undirected theory.
Sol17Opacus 3 years ago
What is it the nanobot is collecting from the side of the cell?
lazyperfectionist1 3 years ago
my guess would be platelets that cause clots.
chewyshoey 3 years ago
Nicotine, fat, grease. And other shit thats making the blood run slower.
gromstad23 3 years ago
amazing, so when r nanbots going to replacedrugs?
xtrovertedxxx 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
we will be dead by the time this happens...
NInjas0 3 years ago
Yes, we will be dead. I don't think it will happen so soon - contrary to the opinions of some crackpot "futurists" like Ray Kurzweil.
Then again, we were supposed to have lifespans of 400 by now according to Robert Anton Wilson in his essay "Next Stop: Immortality" published in Future Magazine, November 1978.
lonecretin 3 years ago
@lonecretin we dont have that lifespan but a group of 12 people do have. u must have heard of them. they are responsible for the spraying of the skies worldwide. look out your window now to see it if u havent already noticed. (note,clouds do NOT have straight edges!!)
xxlisafallonxx 1 year ago
lol ghost....
vincel 3 years ago
ccc, hahah
wing210 3 years ago
balls!
vincel 3 years ago
I definitely need some of those critters in my bloodstream after all the Big Macs and Whoppers I've eaten over the years!
myroseaccount 4 years ago
scientists say that in 50 years we will be able to take out our real blood cells replacing them with mechanical ones allowing us to shapeshift!!!!!!!
Crumb68 4 years ago
i dont think its true because if we can shapeshift there will be many murders and robbing cuzz the thief or murderer may change his identity as soon as he murdurers someone
CODMASTA 4 years ago
that is the most stupid thing I've read today...
Ketlo 3 years ago
you and me both man
OhJayzuz 3 years ago
anytime you deal with computers there a error rate, one may fuck you up especally if it runs on windows.
deluxedookie 4 years ago
Everything else hass 'error rates' as well ..... It is not as if these run operating systems anyway.
Jakemmx 4 years ago
what scary is cybo AI Will come form nano tech soon if we can build that small think how fast the thinking of it come to
ArmySupa 4 years ago
Nice. It's like having a Roomba for your body. Inject myself with a few CCs of this and I can eat all the fried foods I want.
Viperatut 4 years ago
ummmm, sounds really disgusting--the fry food.
terrafirmaterrafirma 4 years ago
actually this probably will happen in the next 30 years concidering the fact we have already alterd into nanobots.
12yearoldspartan 4 years ago
sorry for my ignorance, but nanobots are real??? we actually make them??
ls1phsyco 4 years ago
We have made small mechanical machines on the micron scale (I have even), but I have not run across anything near autonomous.
Jakemmx 4 years ago
damn,how the hell do you make such little mechanical parts?
ls1phsyco 4 years ago
They are printed, using basically the same process in which circuit boards are printed. I don't own the machines (WAY too expensive), but was able to use them through a proff at school.
Jakemmx 4 years ago
wow, and they have little motors?
ls1phsyco 4 years ago
There are ways to make little motors, gears, lifts (screw motor attached to a lever arm), etc. MEMS (not reall 'nano') seems to mostly be used at the moment for sensors (like the accelerometer on the Wii-motes), but you can make some interesting things (Ex: a friend of mine made a tinny little 8-'legged' 'robot' that has joints that can contract with extremely minute temperature changes ... so it manages to walk (perhaps more like stumble) forward in most environments :)
Jakemmx 4 years ago
incredible, are these living beens or just robots??
ls1phsyco 4 years ago
They are simply mechanical structures, and no more living than a car transmission. I have seen a few that had basic logic elements built in, but even the most symplistic calculator usually dwarfs their capabilities in that regard ... I hesitate to even call any of them robots, but that is a very loose term.
Jakemmx 4 years ago
I doubt that anything this small could ever have thoughts (atoms are simply too big), but it could consist of organic parts I guess (when is something 'living' anyway). Enzimes and other protines, along with simple mechanical movements, could allow it to attach to and remove something once it bumps into it, but I don't think they would be able to activily persue something (basically a man-made white blood cell, but designed to remove cholesterol)
Jakemmx 4 years ago
wow, do you know of any sites where I can see pictures of these little creatures and more info?
ls1phsyco 4 years ago
For this to happen in the next 30 years requires a legion of primitive nanobots swimming around in a petri dish in a lab somewhere - already. In 30 years I bet we wouldn't have gotten around sticking two atoms together.
lonecretin 3 years ago
You're joking right? Nanotech is already here. We've allready built super-strong nanotubes, nanomotors and possibly some other stuff. Now it's a matter of developing and refining the technology in terms of the applications we want to use it for.
Bridgerboy 3 years ago 9
that is my fear... when they can use this technology for evil
desire4liberation 3 years ago
That's inevitably what happens to all good inventions. SOmeone develops an evil purpose for it.
horyo 3 years ago 2
I agree with you guys, sorry for the nanobots, it would be great that the were used just to the good, but...
deusmihifortis 3 years ago
It's always those people who want to tarnish the name of science in pushing ahead their own mad plans.
horyo 3 years ago
@Bridgerboy acually Nature has created nano technology since forever, cells, bacteria, virus we are only just getting started
menu12345 1 year ago
your name lonecretin says it all, and your stupid and need to do research instead of watching youtube videos you know nothing about.
Wraithgoddess 3 years ago 2
30 years is only about 30 years away anyways
not that far away!
Gannondalf 3 years ago
It's not far away. Scientific progress-wise, it's virtually the present.
lonecretin 3 years ago
This would be great but unfourtuately this might not happen in the next 100 years or so
gchhour 4 years ago
Look at the strides we've taken in the last ten years. You never know... a hundred years is a tad much.
Hritzness 4 years ago
a hundred years is about right-strictly speaking this image displayed here would not even be a nanobot: red blood cells have ~7 micrometers in diameter
ycalm 4 years ago
cute
mrbonaparte 4 years ago
wonderfull! is really beautifull, good job!
.molecula.infinita-contagiate!
nanometrik 4 years ago
Very nice work!
nanogirl 4 years ago
This will not happen anytime within the next 100 years. Sorry.
AD2080 4 years ago