Imputed vs Infused Righteousness by R.C. Sproul - Part 1 of 2

[polopowers1]

Reaction to infused righteousness as usual is reactive Because Catholics use the word infused protestants turn to imputatation No righteousness is yet unfulfilled Christ's death to satisfy God's Nature is done.God made His elect perfectly righteous now.Because we are new creations NOW nothing more We are NOT working fulfillment to our righteousness by works of law or its obedience.To say Christ was a man to be proven by law obedience is false,Christ was born righteous.He proved law of no effect

[polopowers1]

RC says we only have an account of righteousness in future redemption.I would like to know what will be made righteous future.? New birth has all the righteousness of Christ.The Holy Spirit has all qualities of righteousness. We are new creations now. The new man will be glorified but not improved upon in righteousness.Christ did not become or fulfill His own righteousness by law in obeying or working it. Christ did not submit to law to fulfill it. He submitted law to His perfect rightousness

[polopowers1]

The Catholic teaching of infuse righteousness is wrong because baptism does not infuse special grace to begin becoming righteous. RC however says Jesus Christ submitted to the law to make His blood righteous, to fulfill the law of righteousness.This according to Sproul and most believers believe in a forensic, accounted righteousnessChrist did not earn righteousness by obeying law or doing its works This is a backward way of saying we are saved by works of law.RC says we are not righteous cont.