The „puffs of gas” in a non-demolished building appear due to the pressure of the upper collapsing floors pushing on the air in the buiding. Air has volume, too, you know.
@ZergAteu I am not an expert but if you look at 0:21 , there is a smoke jet five or six floors under the ones that are crashing. I insist, I am not an expert, but its very very small, and only in a direction.
@cafemm Yes, there is, but as I said, having the air compressed by the falling upper levels, puts pressure on all windows and leads to the breaking of the wekest window, which pushes debris through that windows, which, in turn, explains the effect you see.
Number one. There is not a demo charge in that building. Number two. The manner in which it collapses looks NOTHING like a controlled demolition. Number three. NOTHING was found in the debris pointing to a controlled demo.
You conspirocy theorists make me laugh. Totally dilluded. There's no explosions in the other tower at all, that's fire you moron! there's no explosions from the collapsing tower, thats air pressure you moron. Are you a civil or structural engineer? I studied civil engineering. How can you possibly judge that 9/11 was an inside job from a low quality video recording? That's uterlly absurd! Look at the construction of the WTC, study it like I did at university, maybe then you'll understand.
@lectrific16 And study the 9/11 like me during the las t three years and you´ll understand: Dimitri Khalezov. And his banned book on Amazon: The Third Truth
@Inigo37 Nuclear detonation? Are you aware that no less than 3 seismology recording stations recorded the collapse of the WTC? And none of them recorded anything unusual in the collapse. All of the recorded a gradually increasing sound wave the grew and subsided. Just as the collapse did. A nuclear detonation would be an ENORMOUS seismic wave..
@roquefortfiles You tell me that a nuclear detonation would be an ENORMOUS seismic wave, ok, jejejejeje: can you tell me what is the seismic wave of a hidrogen bomb of 100megaton underground explosion in the richter scale?, and second: no less than 3 seismology recording stations, and none of then recorded anything unusual in the collapse: did you work on this stations?: please man, no more jokes, please!!!!
@roquefortfiles I can do th maths? yes? ok: jejejeje. See what you tell first, and see what you tell second: first: a nuclear detonation would be an ENORMOUS seismic wave. And second: you tell me that 50megaton yielded 7.5... and 150kt? I will tell to you: 5.5-5.6: this is an ENORMOUS seismic wave?: this a very short shaking of the ground, and causes PULVERIZE of the tower, (not totally, but near) then, the explosives begin the collapse.
rebel admit that the puffs COULD come from massive air PRESSURE driving a BOW WAVE "far" ahead of the point of collapse. admit it rebel. i only say COULD lets be a fair soul about this rebel. i know you can do it all you have to say is its possible rebel. you will in truth greatly helping your cause.
wow Americans got terrorist get in a two towers put the charges and bring towers down with American people in it soooo if there where no terrorists in side the towers planting then there is one answer Americans are terrorists getting payed to kill Americans wow nice we pay taxes so they can kill more Americans hate government love country
what else could of caused puffs like this? umm bow-wave pressure riding the leading edges taking the OPEN pathway of least resistences until they are BLOCKED thereby BUILDING and REVERSING the DIRECTION of PRESSURE or by BLOWING out a window FAR ahead of the BOW WAVE. pressure will travel down stairs straight for 50 floors until blocked then veer off out a open hallway if thats the path o least resistence. think door slamming because window open. think BOOM.
This should be reposted without all the narrator's plosives sounding like he's eating the mic. It undermines his understanding of acoustics that he can't control his own sound recording well enough to keep the audio from sounding so poor on his own vocal track.
more than quarter of external supports were broke,we dunno how many internal supports went that way.The top leaned over cause of the support break points then its own weight snapped it off &it fell on2 lower floor but it couldnt hold the increased falling weight so dropped,&the next floor gave way &the next,it increased in speed,loud bangs where heard as each floor got whacked by the fallin higher floors,debris shootin out is from floors,shafts & air conditionin squashin together
@magnusalexa And that's the official explanation, neatly recapped, the so-called pancake theory. And it completely ignores the tons of evidence from dozens and dozens of sources and eyewitnesses of secondary explosions. It also fails to explain the PULVERIZATION of the central support columns just a few floors below the impact site, and for all subsequent UNDAMAGED floors.
While the first tower is collapsing why does the fire in 2nd tower seem to erupt more (Orange colours appear through the smoke) Is it just the camera taking time to focus or is there a connection?
Whether or not there was a conspiracy, explosives were not necessary to bring the buildings down the way they were designed to fall, and I'm sure erratic placement of explosives shown in most 'conspiracy' videos are not adequate.
lol I have to laugh at this one, "the buildings were designed to fall.""
Say what!? Since when are buildings designed to fall!?
BTW thermite isn't like a high explosive, it's an incendiary pyrotechnic combustion, so tons of thermite/thermate could be going off inside that building without much external evidence, such as molten metal pouring from the building, a few squibs, and so on.
So let me get this straight. Are you debunkers saying that we Americans lack the technology necessary to pull off an inside job of this magnitude?
Are you debunkers and deniers saying that our American forces (including our media, our military, our government, and our technology) does not have what it takes to do an inside job good enough to pull off 911?
Maybe you should stop dissing what we Americans are capable of doing and show some respect for our covert ops and abilities.
I'm sorry, but there is nothing else in the world that you could legitimately compare this occurence to. There is no reference in the WORLD of buildings this size collapsing. Thanks for the theories, life is hard to believe in the first place, so is an event like this.
anyone who believes that the theory of someone or bodies just pranced up the wtcenters placing bombs to blow the buildings up is a stupid one, seriously under estimate the power of the cia, and the government of greedy neocons and their ability create a riechstag to get the people behind their leaders so they can trade your, sons and husbands, daughters and wives blood for oil.
do you know how much bush, cheney, rove and others made off this war? check their stocks.
this is a fascinating annalysis. unbiased for the most part. i just wish the audio was better. it's cool to see the sounds, but i still want to hear it. anyone know where the original clip is? i'm curious about that repeating bang as it falls
National Tv will not talk about everything that went on that day. Its fact, go downtown nyc and talk to almost any who was there, as them what they think of new and media. That is my challenge to anyone who thinks it was not a inside job.
Did anyone know that there were people at the scene who recorded the very incriminating radio comunication of more than 9 hours of talking between workers discussing the sequences of effents as they are to occur.
This evidence was sileced, only people on the clean up knew about it, it was common knowledge. I am not talking about "theories".
Go on the forums for first responders as well as forums for wtc clean up personel. There is much not spoken of. Dude,I was there for 3 days,you cant tel me
Individuals in this day and age, cannot speak about what they see with there own eyes, if it incriminates the govt. Some where made to sign docs and theatened and silenced. That is all i want to say.
Sorry but the theory that explosive charges are placed in the building is BEYOND ridiculous. Someone or group of people just happen to wander through the building setting shape charges to take out the columns? Then dispersing miles of chord to set it all off? Come on!!! So impractical its a joke. And if so why wait for planes to hit it? Why not just detonate the charges to begin with. The theory is STUUUUUUUUPID.
roquefortfiles it is clear you where not at wt. In case you where not, almost all who was there...Everyone who helped on the day of and days after knew about it,(how towers came down)and so was i, and that is why it is on the internet. Everyone who was there wants to know why it was not on national TV. It looks like roquefortiles lived on the moon for the last 7.5 years...
Come on man. THINK for a moment how incredibly ridiculous this whole implosion theory is. When you examine it it simply falls apart from the SHEER silliness of it. I was the news camera guy on a very large building implosion. I saw it less than a block away. It is a very deliberate, timed event that happens in stages. When i look at the WTC collapse i see NONE of that. Bare shape charges placed in that building would blow out ENTIRE walls. I doubt it was a "prepped" drop. Just silly!!
i cant believe that some faggots are still kissing the ass of the real masterminders of 9/11. A jackass already figured out who did it. it an ......side job.
Tasia36... Just because someone questions this event does not in anyway show disrespect to those who died. There are things that don't add up about that day. Don't kid yourself.
They dont add up because you dont want them to. It so simple and straight forward but clouded by paranoid delusions. Better watch what you say as the government is spending millions of dollars per year and thousands of man hours watching you. Lol your funny. Do your homework or your gunna flunk first grade.
The Bush administration kinda set themselves up for it with their flaky governance. The Patriot Act, lies about WMD and Saddam, and many other lies and deception coming out of this regime. People are tired of it. If the government funded proper investigations immediately following the event, they would have compiled enough information to defend themself. Instead, the FBI started confiscating peoples cameras, survellance tapes, etc, and have not released anything, or funded a proper investigation
nothing pisses me off more than when people say 911 was a fake.
dude, you're on like a windows 98 computer trying to sell a piece of crap. people who twist things unrealistically to make it seem like this was a conspiracy are stupid and have no respect for those who died. the "explosions" are from the fact that the building is falling down in on itself you retard, why wouldn't there be explosions?
tasia36...if this building simply collapsed, where are the 47 4inch thick structural steel core colums? hmmm? you need to wake up and quit acting like a 3rd grader calling people names and saying this gives no respect to those who died. I had friends who WERE in tower one, who couldnt get down, and one of them actually called me, and told me the building was shaking like it was having earthquakes, and they all knew it was bombs destroying the core columns.Google "operation able danger".
Built to withstand the collision of a 707, not a 747 as I'm sure you meant to type. I believe that's because the 707 was the largest plane they had at the time of construction.
"check out architects and engineers for 9-11 truth"
You mean that motley collection of flakes and frauds, where they don't even bother to check their credentials?
That loon-site claims some of those socalled "engineers" are actually structural engineers, but not one of them shows up in the online list of certified structural engineers. Not even one of them.
It's pretty sad when a pack of losers has to lie to give themselves the appearance of credibility.
notice right before they collapse us se an explosion or fire ball which means there were bombs planted because to collapse a building u have to hit it low but the planes struck high it was all a set up
5:45-5:53 i can hear mini explosions half a second after eachother from when the explosion started at the top, so this might of been some conspracy and made it look like some sort of terrorist attack, or the terrorists might had some inside influance and planted explosives, then when the planes crashed in to the two towers it would trigger the explosives,
Ok if I was the ONLY PERSON who didn't hear or speak but could see. Didn't know about the planes hitting the towers. Just to look at this video. YOU CAN SEE EXPLOSIONS! Now if you look at other controlled demolitions they are EXACTLY THE SAME. Could fuel do this and that yes. But the fuel from the plane. THE HEAT. DID NOT TAKE DOWN THE BUILDINGS. ALL BY THEMSELVES. OPEN UP YOUR EYES.
It's pretty funny...if you see the interviews of the firemen. Even they said it "SOUNDED" like bombs exploding. That there were SECONDARY EXPLOSIONS. Do your researh of THIS tragedy. Before talking to ANY OTHER FIREMAN. THOSE WHO WERE THERE AND SURVIVED. Look into it before talking out your BUTTTTTT.
Pancake collapses make claping sounds when one floor collapses in on the other. Again, basics of structural firefighting. Think about what some of you peeps are saying, really.
What is the definitive professional acoustical analysis of ALL sounds close to WTC between the time just before the strikes and the collapses? Also, is there acoustical analysis of WTC7 sounds? How about acoustical analysis of sounds at the Pentagon? Just wondering...
All I can say is no one has ever seen building ever 1/3 the size of these buildings collapse, so no one really knows how they would behave. Windows being blown out many floors below the main collapsing cloud could easily be the result of air blasting out through the elevator shafts. Just MHO
Basics of City firefightin brother...it happened EXACTLY like it should have...if there were bombs them the floors wouldnt have collapsed in on the floors below them the way they did...no science needed just common sense which obviously lacks here
Again weather you are a fireman or not. One thing it says you are 18 and the other says your 20. Anyway. NO I don't know the way buildings fall when bombs are used. But being at two building collapses. Seeing how THEY FELL. Then looking how the towers fell. THEY LOOKED A LOT alike. I don't give a crap WHO you are. Regardless of how you use YOUR common sense. You are still wet behind the ears lil man. Live alittle and then come talk your crap. You think your way. I will think mine.
I ain't on here to try and change anyones mind. These are still my views weather you agree with them or not. Unless YOU CAN PROVE EVERYTHING you THINK you know. I know I CAN'T but until anyone can say for 100% certainty. That this happened and this and that person was or was not involved. Then all we can give is OPINIONS. I'm intitled to mine. We both can look at the same thing and see SOMETHING TOTALLY DIFFERENT. You keep believing what your being spoon fed. I choose not to.
@rebelforgod yes it was a total waste of time! You can totally hear sounds that were added that are not in this original footage! On this video you can hear a guy saying "Oh my god" and people screaming at 0:29, where you cannot in the original
Here is one link to that footage with better sound quality, which I am sure you can find more, notice it does not have all kinds of screaming, no guy yelling "Oh my god!" and fake bomb sounds....
@rebelforgod whether it was dubbed in or not...we dont need fake or edited footage to know the 9/11 was an inside job. Keep it up. Let ppl know the truth
Fires in the wtc reached well over 5000 degrees which is nearly 3 times what the protected steel could stand...I know you libtards dont have a need to use logic and sense in your arguments but youre going to have to try harder next time. Sorry guys
5000 degrees you say, I believe you are correct, but it was not from kerosene, as that will burn no more than 600 degrees. Else how come a kerosene lamp doesn't melt when you use it. But yes thermite gets to 8000 plus and does a great job. I took some concrete path and through it from a cliff well over a thousand feet, it did not turn to dust. To quote Larry, "We pulled the building."
God you people are dumb. The jet fuel burns, the combustibles burn, the chemicals burn, then the building insulates it so the heat doesnt go anywhere. I wish i could meet you people so i could back a truck over your skulls. Thermal images measured the heat to be upwards of 5000 degrees....a regular house fire w/o accellerants burn at 1500 assholes...now drop dead you stupid liberal faggots
do you realize that you haven't used any quantitative data...oh apart from thermal images which are used by the truth movement because THEY PROVE THAT SOMETHING HOTTER THAN OFFICE FIRES AND JET FUEL FIRES WERE IN THE BUILDINGS! you say it yourself that regular house fires can only reach 1500, so do you think an office fire can reach 3500 degrees more? or is it the jet fuel which has a maximum of 1800 degrees that convinces you?
prove your argument with physics, or betta yet, learn some physics
Listen you ignorant fuck. Gasoline alone burns at 4,000 degrees. This is why the steel was melted and why the building came down. Heat not bombs brought down those buildings. If you want you can come over and i'll show you just how hot that shit burns and you can see what kind of damage it can do first hand okay you ignorant piece of liberal shit.
Liquid fuels will vaporise before getting close enough 2 a hotspot 2 support heating above 1600C. Alternative = force feul & oxygen together 4 more heat, x: when burning coal w forced air. A structural fire w JP4/5 is the same. Get close to the heat & it vaporises & removes heat, until it mixes with fresh air 4 a flame, thus heat is decentralised w little chance of concentrating in steel structure fire.
A reason why steel used in WTCs, buildings designed to withstand this. Sue engineers too?
Hey Genius barkracing02 I am really glad you are smarter than the engineers at NIST who stated they do not know how it happened. They should have just called you instead of doing test!
@barkracing02 You're so wrong it's laughable: ""The most commonly known flammable liquid is gasoline. It has a flash point of about -50° F (-65° C). The ignition temperature is about 495° F (232(232° C) [sic], a comparatively low figure."
And jet planes don't run on GASOLINE. Jet fuel is mostly KEROSENE. Good lord, how can you even post without cringing?
You need to completely fabricate 'science' to defend a weak position.
But listen to yourself. You'd burn another human alive for .... what?
"When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains--however improbable--must be the truth." Food for thought for all the naysayers, what exactly would burn at 5000 degrees for 6 hours if anything.....hmmmm Thermate/Thermite placed in these 3 buildings prior to 9/11. Do the research before you jump allover people who think for themselves bark. Thanks
Its the same reason it would take forever for the heat to leave your oven after you turn it off...There was minimal to no ventilation. Heat builds up. Structural firefighting...check it out
Giday ve240 I too have done my own Q&A and agree with your analyses, what I conclude is if the experts are silent or support this idea that 911 was executed by 15 Saudi men with box cutters, then they are involved or offering support to the conspiracy and must be seen as terrorists, as they have aided and with held evidence to a crime. These also Politicians world wide, including OZ NZ UK Canada. Ny point is the Parliament in Japan has stood up, these brave nobel men and women are true leaders.
Had not though of Guantanmo Bay, nice touch. You might like to look at Terror Storm, 77 was also an inside job. You may have heard about the Hijacking in New Zealand, really silly, it is pointing at an inside job. She looks to have been loaded with more than a knife. It might not be the case, but she didn't even pack her things, and the cab driver who dropped her off at the airport said she had no idea where she wanted to go. Hardly terrorist thinking, more like drugs or Hypnoses in my opinion.
Sad stuff vespacurry. I did a quick google on this and it seems she was mentally ill? That seemns to be the state media's attitude anyway. Only 7 months till Bush is out.
Mentally ill? Mouths before NZ tried to make changes to our liberties. Then this happened, the laws went through, all about security. I asked, she is mentally ill, she gets in a cab doesn't know where she wants to go, I quote the cab driver, ends up at a small airport with no security. Has a knife, coincidence. Then suddenly in mid flight takes it upon herself to stab the pilot and make demands to fly to Australia, it smell rotten to me. NZ Government ( Masons) have a past.
I , as a firefighter, get a huge kick out of watching you people and your theories of bombs bringing down the wtc but its all bullshit. What happened was what we in the bizz call a pancake collapse due to the steel weakening at the top floors of the buildings. "well the steel was heat treated" FALSE...it was coated with concrete and asbestos which all came off with the impact. see above comment for more
You stupid fucking liberal. You just disproved your own theory. 6 HOURS is your answer homo. 6 hours of 3 thousand degree heat. Think about whats burning in those buildings, synthetic materials and petroleum products both of which burn really hot. There asshole now go get a job you lazy good for nothing liberal
The south tower had 15% of its other and core columns severed and another 30% of them damaged, not to mention the fireproofing blown off of the rest of them and the weight of thirty floors pushing down. the madrid building was made of concrete encased steel columns, and concrete is a very good insulator.maybe if you could explain to me how they hid the bombs in the building then prevented them from exploding in the impact,and how they are silent explosions, then i would believe you
Now try it again with the real audio from that day. There were only male fire fighters standing there, then you hear women screaming. Then a man yells "Oh. my God." That man is Michael Hezarkhani, and the sopund is lifted from his video of the second plane strike. He filmed it from Battery Park on the top deck of a ferry moored near Castle Clinton.
the largest building in spain just recently had the top ten floors in flames for over 24hrs, folowing was the entire building, they just let it burn. the whole thing was a smoldering skelleton but with its engineering and construction being neandertholithic in comparison it managed to stay standing
The truth and the mouths of uneducated fools like Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas and Korey Rowe are utter strangers.
People like Dave Von Kleist, Alex Jones, and Chris Bollyn sometimes (rarely) know the truth but do not give it to you unless they want to cover a bigger lie. The real truth would have them tarred and feathered for trying to start the RaHoWa. They're Nazis, trolling for useful idiots.
Nazis are worthless excuses for human beings. They want a race war, but know they do not have the numbers they need to pull it off. That's why they keep screaming that everything about 9/11 says that the Jews did it. They are trying to recruit useful idiots for the RaHoWa. I'm dead if they succede. That's why an old New Deal Democrat like me has firearms and a lot of ammo.
Are you aware of the fact that white nationalists are behind most of these whackjob theories? How many of them scream "Da Joooos done it." Nazis trolling for useful idiots. Read The Turner Diaries (remembering that this is a dystopian novel written by a dirtbag of no value to his society) and you will see that 9/11 was a windfall for the racist scum.
thats the floors and everything above crashing into whats below u moron conspirator, and those so called 'squibs' is from all the pressure built up inside from the collapse the air find the fastest way out which is to the sides
William Rodriguez's story is something to take seriously. If there are bombs and loud explosions in the basement that severed peoples limbs BEFORE plane impact look no further. The jet fuel down elevator shaft does not apply when the plane hasn't hit the building yet.
The audio on that first clip you showed is really fake by the way, dubbed over by a desperate conspiracy theorist. I've seen it raw myself. Ahhh who do we believe? O_o
I don't give a shit about 9/11, I don't live in the states, and had nothing to do with it. I'm just saying I think that audio is fake, but I do still think there's too many unanswered questions.
Seeing as you obviously have very little idea how to run the analysis program that you are using, i'll go easy:
You suck. You play a video thorough a program, and then point out some puffs of smoke caused by air pressure as a 500,000 tone building pushes air around. Then you look at the audio spectrum of the collapse as heard from a handheld camera, with people screaming in the backround, and you say that these little blips on the screen are evidence of explosions! Learn the program, then talk.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Haven´t you ever seen a building collapsing??? You try to be a wiseguy and you show this crap with accoustic program or wateva... These small smoke puffs come out because of pressure... and so called "explosions" aren´t bombs... they´re electrical sources and generators or whatever exploding, and again, because of pressure... bombs don´t explode like this. they don´t make puffs like these shown in the video...
there were no bombs you retards- its plain and simple hijacked planes loaded with jet fuel caused the destruction- there was no conspiracy except the one involving the terrorists-
P.S. Concrete does not turn to powdered dust unless enormous force is applied (explosive force!), far more than the force of gravity which is what they want us to believe caused the complete pulverization and segmentation of BOTH towers!!!
I have no doubt we haven't seen anything yet, I sure hope I am wrong, but the wheels have been in motion, and Bush does whatever he wants anyway, so hold on, we are in for ww3, a war like we have never seen before.....
A heavy concrete steel- frame structure pulverized in 8 seconds...Free fall speed, lack of gravity, basements blown up before the plane hit, bombs going off on all floors...Marvin Bush head of Securacom...Tell me no more...
They say that the jet fuel burned at the impact levels hot enough to melt the supporting steel, which requires 2000 degrees F. Yet, you can see survivors peering out of the impact hole after the crash before the building collapse.
There were the 2 Towers and Building 7 at the WTC that collapsed into their own footprints that day. Heat from the fires melting the steel at 2000 degrees is blamed. This has never happened before or since anywhere in the world - even with far hotter fires burning for many more hours. Yet, it happened at the 47-story Building 7 without a plane crashing into it. There are simply too many unanswered questions...
You know who are the real losers. You people who after 7 years of unmitigated disaster continue to defend the lunatic in the White house as if he is some kind of hero instead of a morally corrupt facist enriching his filty rich buddies while innocents die all around.
First off Im not sure why im trying to argue with idiots... but if there were explosives then you would have heard them. And there are other non-media tapes that confirms the sound of it collapsing... im pretty sure the US hasnt invented silent explosives yet. And im pretty sure the media isnt an appendage of the executive branch considering how critical they are of bush. You people are losers that prolly sit around ur mommas house and watch to many conspiracy movies. Grow a f---in brain.
mabey you should look up the REAL ID act, or mabey the North AMerican union, and you will think diffrent. you gotta have an open mind my friend, if you don't your going to be the first one with a mircochip into you, NWO is coming you better get ready
Well have fun with that...I feel sorry that you have wasted so much of your life...I have an open mind but not to stupidity, Have fun in your little fantasy world.
the collapse of the building's noises would mask the sound of the explosives. sounds of sirens and people screaming would also mask it, plus those floors are so high up that people wouldn't hear them
You honestly think they would make it obvious you goose!
Explosions going off in the core would be muffled by the enormous amount of noise from the falling debris, people just dont realise how big these things were and its easy to lose sight of the enormity of the collapse and the amount of debris...
Their were explosions in the sub levels that melted steel soon after the plane crash. The explanation was jet fuel running down the elevator shafts to the sub levels. However, surviving sub level employees and some first responders reported the smell of cordite.
if you further an investigation, there were interviews of people who were there that did report they heard boom boom boom and several explosions..these interviews were snatched from the news and after the first day ...never aired again..How do you explain that? I'm just furthering my education on this? and the semetrical fall of the buildings? and I'm not an idiot, an idiot doesn't want to be educated....
I thought the same thing but when I saw a different clip it showed there was a white puff from around the middle floor that was at least 30-40 floors below what was collapsing. Theres no way the compression from that many floors above caused that. In the sound quality it even sounds like a demolition.
On studying dozens of clips, it becomes obvious that they used an interesting method of demo. (because they only had easy access to the center 47 columns, not the office space?) They fragmented the main columns as per normal, using cutting charges, but I think they also used centrally placed H.E. 'push' charges to 'push out' the floor plates which in turn pushed the outer steel cladding/framing out of column. That pulverized the concrete slab floors and created the huge squibs.
Its hard to guess whats happening inside...who knows, but explosions are loud, and explosions big enough to level a building that size would be like a fire cracker in silence of your back yard...in other words without a doubt u would know it was an explosion.
Is there a conspiracy regarding the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the towers? So why haven't we heard that in SIX YEARS? How can you analyze the physics of the impact without the distribution of steel and concrete thru the building? How many tons of steel can you heat to 1100 deg F in 56 minutes? Didn't the designers have to figure out what ot put on each level in the 1960s? see WTC Impact Model - MIT
This has been flagged as spam show
'Tuesday Morning in September'. Available on DVD. Runtime 130 minutes.
Pure, unfiltered, authentic, and being released in such a way to keep its integrity.
Project is not affiliated and or connected to, working for any organization,
putting forth propaganda and or slant perspectives of the events on 9/11.
It is the most complete chronicle in real time of the wtc attacks.
Supersynapsis 3 months ago
The „puffs of gas” in a non-demolished building appear due to the pressure of the upper collapsing floors pushing on the air in the buiding. Air has volume, too, you know.
ZergAteu 8 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
@ZergAteu I am not an expert but if you look at 0:21 , there is a smoke jet five or six floors under the ones that are crashing. I insist, I am not an expert, but its very very small, and only in a direction.
cafemm 8 months ago
@cafemm Yes, there is, but as I said, having the air compressed by the falling upper levels, puts pressure on all windows and leads to the breaking of the wekest window, which pushes debris through that windows, which, in turn, explains the effect you see.
ZergAteu 8 months ago
@ZergAteu jajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja
Inigo37 2 weeks ago
the sound in that video was fake :p
movieman175 9 months ago
Number one. There is not a demo charge in that building. Number two. The manner in which it collapses looks NOTHING like a controlled demolition. Number three. NOTHING was found in the debris pointing to a controlled demo.
Such a plausible theory!!! Not.
roquefortfiles 9 months ago
@roquefortfiles And number four: Leslie Raphael. Serendipity.li
Inigo37 2 weeks ago
You conspirocy theorists make me laugh. Totally dilluded. There's no explosions in the other tower at all, that's fire you moron! there's no explosions from the collapsing tower, thats air pressure you moron. Are you a civil or structural engineer? I studied civil engineering. How can you possibly judge that 9/11 was an inside job from a low quality video recording? That's uterlly absurd! Look at the construction of the WTC, study it like I did at university, maybe then you'll understand.
lectrific16 11 months ago
@lectrific16 jajajajajaja: prove this, stupid: Leslie Raphael. Serendipity.li
Inigo37 2 weeks ago
@lectrific16 And study the 9/11 like me during the las t three years and you´ll understand: Dimitri Khalezov. And his banned book on Amazon: The Third Truth
Inigo37 2 weeks ago
@Inigo37 3rd truth? What would that be?
roquefortfiles 2 weeks ago
@roquefortfiles Now, you have the MAIN KEY to inestigate, do it yourself, as me was do: (sorry for my level english, is not my mother languaje):
Youtube: Dimitri Khalezov.
And Leslie Raphael, Serendipity.li
Inigo37 1 week ago
@Inigo37 ??? Sorry, I don't even understand what you are trying to tell me. English is not your first language...ok. But have a point to your post.
roquefortfiles 1 week ago
@roquefortfiles Have a point in my post? A-MA-ZING, can you read the articles that I have write to you? or not.
Inigo37 1 week ago
@Inigo37 Nuclear detonation? Are you aware that no less than 3 seismology recording stations recorded the collapse of the WTC? And none of them recorded anything unusual in the collapse. All of the recorded a gradually increasing sound wave the grew and subsided. Just as the collapse did. A nuclear detonation would be an ENORMOUS seismic wave..
This is absolutely silly material.
roquefortfiles 1 week ago
@roquefortfiles You tell me that a nuclear detonation would be an ENORMOUS seismic wave, ok, jejejejeje: can you tell me what is the seismic wave of a hidrogen bomb of 100megaton underground explosion in the richter scale?, and second: no less than 3 seismology recording stations, and none of then recorded anything unusual in the collapse: did you work on this stations?: please man, no more jokes, please!!!!
Inigo37 1 week ago
@Inigo37 Their results on Sept 11 are searchable on line. A hydrogen bomb would vaporize Manhattan.
Please sir . No more ridiculous shit. Laughably silly topic.
roquefortfiles 1 week ago
@Inigo37 can you tell me what is the seismic wave of a hidrogen bomb of 100megaton underground explosion in the richter scale?,
Well considering a 50 megaton bomb yielded 7.5, scale that up by a factor of 2.
You can do the math.
And you're point was???
Let me guess, they planted a 100 megaton hydrogen bomb under NY and that's what took down the buildings?
Is that how it works?
roquefortfiles 1 week ago
@roquefortfiles I can do th maths? yes? ok: jejejeje. See what you tell first, and see what you tell second: first: a nuclear detonation would be an ENORMOUS seismic wave. And second: you tell me that 50megaton yielded 7.5... and 150kt? I will tell to you: 5.5-5.6: this is an ENORMOUS seismic wave?: this a very short shaking of the ground, and causes PULVERIZE of the tower, (not totally, but near) then, the explosives begin the collapse.
Inigo37 1 week ago
Comment removed
roquefortfiles 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Inigo37 What does jejejeje mean?
Are you on glue? A nuclear bomb under the WTC? Then explosives take over?.
You got one problem with that. Nobody found anything relating to a Controlled Demolition at any of the buildings.
roquefortfiles 1 week ago
my boomer just exploded because of your fucking mouth !!!!!
niquelapeaulisse 11 months ago
Dude! Get your mic away from your mouth!
AtomchildMusic 11 months ago
CD!
scoretosettle 1 year ago
rebel admit that the puffs COULD come from massive air PRESSURE driving a BOW WAVE "far" ahead of the point of collapse. admit it rebel. i only say COULD lets be a fair soul about this rebel. i know you can do it all you have to say is its possible rebel. you will in truth greatly helping your cause.
derpotni3riots 1 year ago
pretty good idea. Maybe some Fourier analysis could be done. Is there any good sounds tracks available?
edicccc 1 year ago
wow Americans got terrorist get in a two towers put the charges and bring towers down with American people in it soooo if there where no terrorists in side the towers planting then there is one answer Americans are terrorists getting payed to kill Americans wow nice we pay taxes so they can kill more Americans hate government love country
APtolik 1 year ago
what else could of caused puffs like this? umm bow-wave pressure riding the leading edges taking the OPEN pathway of least resistences until they are BLOCKED thereby BUILDING and REVERSING the DIRECTION of PRESSURE or by BLOWING out a window FAR ahead of the BOW WAVE. pressure will travel down stairs straight for 50 floors until blocked then veer off out a open hallway if thats the path o least resistence. think door slamming because window open. think BOOM.
derpotni3riots 1 year ago
This should be reposted without all the narrator's plosives sounding like he's eating the mic. It undermines his understanding of acoustics that he can't control his own sound recording well enough to keep the audio from sounding so poor on his own vocal track.
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
more than quarter of external supports were broke,we dunno how many internal supports went that way.The top leaned over cause of the support break points then its own weight snapped it off &it fell on2 lower floor but it couldnt hold the increased falling weight so dropped,&the next floor gave way &the next,it increased in speed,loud bangs where heard as each floor got whacked by the fallin higher floors,debris shootin out is from floors,shafts & air conditionin squashin together
magnusalexa 2 years ago
@magnusalexa
theres no use.. you can even draw it out but there still would be no use...
they are so "smart", and they know..
gama509 2 years ago
@magnusalexa And that's the official explanation, neatly recapped, the so-called pancake theory. And it completely ignores the tons of evidence from dozens and dozens of sources and eyewitnesses of secondary explosions. It also fails to explain the PULVERIZATION of the central support columns just a few floors below the impact site, and for all subsequent UNDAMAGED floors.
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
If the actors of the CSI series would conducted an investigation they would do a better job that this entire 911 commision.
zerobubbel 2 years ago 9
@zerobubbel I think that blues clues and dora the explorer could have done a better investigation then the 9/11 omission, I mean commision.
chaosad09 1 year ago
While the first tower is collapsing why does the fire in 2nd tower seem to erupt more (Orange colours appear through the smoke) Is it just the camera taking time to focus or is there a connection?
allen982 2 years ago
Apologies, had it on mute when watching vid, I see you mentioned explosions in other tower.
allen982 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2 differnet physical strikes. 3 buidlings fall the same?
JimTL1000R 2 years ago
If explosives were not used for demolition then the tower still would be standing up straight until these days
jcardel 2 years ago
man the first tower that fell if u watch it the top fell from where the plane smashed into it.not explosives
MrBenson3436 2 years ago
2 differnt strikes. 3 buildings fall the same.
JimTL1000R 2 years ago
Whether or not there was a conspiracy, explosives were not necessary to bring the buildings down the way they were designed to fall, and I'm sure erratic placement of explosives shown in most 'conspiracy' videos are not adequate.
tiggxtreme 3 years ago
lol I have to laugh at this one, "the buildings were designed to fall.""
Say what!? Since when are buildings designed to fall!?
BTW thermite isn't like a high explosive, it's an incendiary pyrotechnic combustion, so tons of thermite/thermate could be going off inside that building without much external evidence, such as molten metal pouring from the building, a few squibs, and so on.
fubarczar 2 years ago
So let me get this straight. Are you debunkers saying that we Americans lack the technology necessary to pull off an inside job of this magnitude?
Are you debunkers and deniers saying that our American forces (including our media, our military, our government, and our technology) does not have what it takes to do an inside job good enough to pull off 911?
Maybe you should stop dissing what we Americans are capable of doing and show some respect for our covert ops and abilities.
Gnothean 3 years ago 18
With open borders anything is possible !
JimTL1000R 2 years ago
@Gnothean yes your country is a joke
NScott45 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm sorry but your a f*******g retard. There was no bombs planted in the building
britishareawesome69 3 years ago
Your the fucking blind bastard. You can see explosions exiting the building. Suck a dick, retarded homo.
Numba1H8ter 3 years ago
No you can't, you can only see dust and debris exiting the building.
Quizcos 2 years ago
I'm sorry, but there is nothing else in the world that you could legitimately compare this occurence to. There is no reference in the WORLD of buildings this size collapsing. Thanks for the theories, life is hard to believe in the first place, so is an event like this.
sNuFFReALiTY 3 years ago
anyone who believes that the theory of someone or bodies just pranced up the wtcenters placing bombs to blow the buildings up is a stupid one, seriously under estimate the power of the cia, and the government of greedy neocons and their ability create a riechstag to get the people behind their leaders so they can trade your, sons and husbands, daughters and wives blood for oil.
do you know how much bush, cheney, rove and others made off this war? check their stocks.
you are sheep. ba sheep. ba.
AllMachine 3 years ago
this is a fascinating annalysis. unbiased for the most part. i just wish the audio was better. it's cool to see the sounds, but i still want to hear it. anyone know where the original clip is? i'm curious about that repeating bang as it falls
cybermollusk 3 years ago
During this building collapse, there are other explosions inside the other building. Have you noticed it????????????
Watch seconds 19 to 21 of this video.
degocamon 3 years ago
National Tv will not talk about everything that went on that day. Its fact, go downtown nyc and talk to almost any who was there, as them what they think of new and media. That is my challenge to anyone who thinks it was not a inside job.
xtwillox 3 years ago
Did anyone know that there were people at the scene who recorded the very incriminating radio comunication of more than 9 hours of talking between workers discussing the sequences of effents as they are to occur.
This evidence was sileced, only people on the clean up knew about it, it was common knowledge. I am not talking about "theories".
Go on the forums for first responders as well as forums for wtc clean up personel. There is much not spoken of. Dude,I was there for 3 days,you cant tel me
xtwillox 3 years ago
Individuals in this day and age, cannot speak about what they see with there own eyes, if it incriminates the govt. Some where made to sign docs and theatened and silenced. That is all i want to say.
xtwillox 3 years ago
Sorry but the theory that explosive charges are placed in the building is BEYOND ridiculous. Someone or group of people just happen to wander through the building setting shape charges to take out the columns? Then dispersing miles of chord to set it all off? Come on!!! So impractical its a joke. And if so why wait for planes to hit it? Why not just detonate the charges to begin with. The theory is STUUUUUUUUPID.
roquefortfiles 3 years ago
roquefortfiles it is clear you where not at wt. In case you where not, almost all who was there...Everyone who helped on the day of and days after knew about it,(how towers came down)and so was i, and that is why it is on the internet. Everyone who was there wants to know why it was not on national TV. It looks like roquefortiles lived on the moon for the last 7.5 years...
xtwillox 3 years ago
Come on man. THINK for a moment how incredibly ridiculous this whole implosion theory is. When you examine it it simply falls apart from the SHEER silliness of it. I was the news camera guy on a very large building implosion. I saw it less than a block away. It is a very deliberate, timed event that happens in stages. When i look at the WTC collapse i see NONE of that. Bare shape charges placed in that building would blow out ENTIRE walls. I doubt it was a "prepped" drop. Just silly!!
roquefortfiles 3 years ago
those puffs of flame and smoke are from thermite.
josephsystempro 3 years ago
i cant believe that some faggots are still kissing the ass of the real masterminders of 9/11. A jackass already figured out who did it. it an ......side job.
judeh1450 3 years ago
I guess your that jackass as anyone with any sense knows what happend and the people without it make up ridiclious claims.
rothschad 3 years ago
Rothschad:
Any government that would do this is probably a fake democracy. AKA they are all the same government.
Mrgyn 3 years ago
I read a lot of comments on this video and I ask some simple questions:
1. The terroist tried in 1993 to take down the towers, why not again?
2. The Terrorist attacked the USS COLE... Somebody (Terrorist) hates us !!
3. They just attacked the Marriott Hotel in Pakastan TODAY, BETTER then on our SOIL !!!
Why do you Bush Haters who was 8 months into office (not enough time to plant bombs) ..... MUST have been Clinton's Administration !!!!
let's hang him
bbad4all 3 years ago
Listening to crazy people ramble is oddly soothing.
salmonax 3 years ago 2
shame could'a used AA guns
xeve21x 3 years ago
Tasia36... Just because someone questions this event does not in anyway show disrespect to those who died. There are things that don't add up about that day. Don't kid yourself.
fttrkillsass 3 years ago
They dont add up because you dont want them to. It so simple and straight forward but clouded by paranoid delusions. Better watch what you say as the government is spending millions of dollars per year and thousands of man hours watching you. Lol your funny. Do your homework or your gunna flunk first grade.
rothschad 3 years ago
The Bush administration kinda set themselves up for it with their flaky governance. The Patriot Act, lies about WMD and Saddam, and many other lies and deception coming out of this regime. People are tired of it. If the government funded proper investigations immediately following the event, they would have compiled enough information to defend themself. Instead, the FBI started confiscating peoples cameras, survellance tapes, etc, and have not released anything, or funded a proper investigation
yakitoriPB 3 years ago
nothing pisses me off more than when people say 911 was a fake.
dude, you're on like a windows 98 computer trying to sell a piece of crap. people who twist things unrealistically to make it seem like this was a conspiracy are stupid and have no respect for those who died. the "explosions" are from the fact that the building is falling down in on itself you retard, why wouldn't there be explosions?
this is retarded.
Tasia36 3 years ago
tasia36...if this building simply collapsed, where are the 47 4inch thick structural steel core colums? hmmm? you need to wake up and quit acting like a 3rd grader calling people names and saying this gives no respect to those who died. I had friends who WERE in tower one, who couldnt get down, and one of them actually called me, and told me the building was shaking like it was having earthquakes, and they all knew it was bombs destroying the core columns.Google "operation able danger".
orangevalesweetpea 3 years ago
the WTC was built to accept collisions of JUMBOS 474.. YOu're a idiot..
FUCK USA's GOVERNMENT..
you are just a sheep..
I hope you die with your ignorance
just read the FACTS and you'll find that is INSIDE JOB
THERE A LOOOOOOOOOOOOT OF FACTS OK?
DONKEY
Luckzzz 3 years ago
Built to withstand the collision of a 707, not a 747 as I'm sure you meant to type. I believe that's because the 707 was the largest plane they had at the time of construction.
JSymoNESx 3 years ago
"check out architects and engineers for 9-11 truth"
You mean that motley collection of flakes and frauds, where they don't even bother to check their credentials?
That loon-site claims some of those socalled "engineers" are actually structural engineers, but not one of them shows up in the online list of certified structural engineers. Not even one of them.
It's pretty sad when a pack of losers has to lie to give themselves the appearance of credibility.
BlazingFerret 3 years ago
You can hear everything you're looking at, why not just listen?
robin223 3 years ago
notice right before they collapse us se an explosion or fire ball which means there were bombs planted because to collapse a building u have to hit it low but the planes struck high it was all a set up
Douglas217 3 years ago
use a fucking pop guard you spaz.
nihility00 3 years ago
all is bullshit
martionhotmail 3 years ago 2
5:45-5:53 i can hear mini explosions half a second after eachother from when the explosion started at the top, so this might of been some conspracy and made it look like some sort of terrorist attack, or the terrorists might had some inside influance and planted explosives, then when the planes crashed in to the two towers it would trigger the explosives,
bloodgoth345 3 years ago
Ok if I was the ONLY PERSON who didn't hear or speak but could see. Didn't know about the planes hitting the towers. Just to look at this video. YOU CAN SEE EXPLOSIONS! Now if you look at other controlled demolitions they are EXACTLY THE SAME. Could fuel do this and that yes. But the fuel from the plane. THE HEAT. DID NOT TAKE DOWN THE BUILDINGS. ALL BY THEMSELVES. OPEN UP YOUR EYES.
m00nlightlady 3 years ago
Stupid fucking liberal ask any fireman...better yet any city fireman
barkracing02 3 years ago
It's pretty funny...if you see the interviews of the firemen. Even they said it "SOUNDED" like bombs exploding. That there were SECONDARY EXPLOSIONS. Do your researh of THIS tragedy. Before talking to ANY OTHER FIREMAN. THOSE WHO WERE THERE AND SURVIVED. Look into it before talking out your BUTTTTTT.
m00nlightlady 3 years ago
Pancake collapses make claping sounds when one floor collapses in on the other. Again, basics of structural firefighting. Think about what some of you peeps are saying, really.
barkracing02 3 years ago
clapping together and disintegrating each level as is goes along? Do you really believe that?
fake2 3 years ago 2
What is the definitive professional acoustical analysis of ALL sounds close to WTC between the time just before the strikes and the collapses? Also, is there acoustical analysis of WTC7 sounds? How about acoustical analysis of sounds at the Pentagon? Just wondering...
redletterchurch 3 years ago
All I can say is no one has ever seen building ever 1/3 the size of these buildings collapse, so no one really knows how they would behave. Windows being blown out many floors below the main collapsing cloud could easily be the result of air blasting out through the elevator shafts. Just MHO
CyrusNixes 3 years ago 2
Basics of City firefightin brother...it happened EXACTLY like it should have...if there were bombs them the floors wouldnt have collapsed in on the floors below them the way they did...no science needed just common sense which obviously lacks here
barkracing02 3 years ago
Again weather you are a fireman or not. One thing it says you are 18 and the other says your 20. Anyway. NO I don't know the way buildings fall when bombs are used. But being at two building collapses. Seeing how THEY FELL. Then looking how the towers fell. THEY LOOKED A LOT alike. I don't give a crap WHO you are. Regardless of how you use YOUR common sense. You are still wet behind the ears lil man. Live alittle and then come talk your crap. You think your way. I will think mine.
m00nlightlady 3 years ago
I ain't on here to try and change anyones mind. These are still my views weather you agree with them or not. Unless YOU CAN PROVE EVERYTHING you THINK you know. I know I CAN'T but until anyone can say for 100% certainty. That this happened and this and that person was or was not involved. Then all we can give is OPINIONS. I'm intitled to mine. We both can look at the same thing and see SOMETHING TOTALLY DIFFERENT. You keep believing what your being spoon fed. I choose not to.
m00nlightlady 3 years ago
Many are certain the sound was dubbed in.
My analysis of the audio also indicates it's not consistant with the video footage.
Let me know if you think this clip is a waste of time, for I may just remove it.
rebelforgod 3 years ago
@rebelforgod yes it was a total waste of time! You can totally hear sounds that were added that are not in this original footage! On this video you can hear a guy saying "Oh my god" and people screaming at 0:29, where you cannot in the original
Here is one link to that footage with better sound quality, which I am sure you can find more, notice it does not have all kinds of screaming, no guy yelling "Oh my god!" and fake bomb sounds....
youtube link with /watch?v=0V8RT0C9Enk
bubbasteve8 1 year ago
@rebelforgod whether it was dubbed in or not...we dont need fake or edited footage to know the 9/11 was an inside job. Keep it up. Let ppl know the truth
Holthane 1 year ago
thats not the real sound of that clip!
dont get me wrong... i dont think it was arabs with box cutters.. just saying the sound you are using is from a different clip!
ster1357 3 years ago
Fires in the wtc reached well over 5000 degrees which is nearly 3 times what the protected steel could stand...I know you libtards dont have a need to use logic and sense in your arguments but youre going to have to try harder next time. Sorry guys
barkracing02 3 years ago
5000 degrees you say, I believe you are correct, but it was not from kerosene, as that will burn no more than 600 degrees. Else how come a kerosene lamp doesn't melt when you use it. But yes thermite gets to 8000 plus and does a great job. I took some concrete path and through it from a cliff well over a thousand feet, it did not turn to dust. To quote Larry, "We pulled the building."
vespacurry 3 years ago
God you people are dumb. The jet fuel burns, the combustibles burn, the chemicals burn, then the building insulates it so the heat doesnt go anywhere. I wish i could meet you people so i could back a truck over your skulls. Thermal images measured the heat to be upwards of 5000 degrees....a regular house fire w/o accellerants burn at 1500 assholes...now drop dead you stupid liberal faggots
barkracing02 3 years ago
do you realize that you haven't used any quantitative data...oh apart from thermal images which are used by the truth movement because THEY PROVE THAT SOMETHING HOTTER THAN OFFICE FIRES AND JET FUEL FIRES WERE IN THE BUILDINGS! you say it yourself that regular house fires can only reach 1500, so do you think an office fire can reach 3500 degrees more? or is it the jet fuel which has a maximum of 1800 degrees that convinces you?
prove your argument with physics, or betta yet, learn some physics
hyperion337 3 years ago 2
Listen you ignorant fuck. Gasoline alone burns at 4,000 degrees. This is why the steel was melted and why the building came down. Heat not bombs brought down those buildings. If you want you can come over and i'll show you just how hot that shit burns and you can see what kind of damage it can do first hand okay you ignorant piece of liberal shit.
barkracing02 3 years ago
Liquid fuels will vaporise before getting close enough 2 a hotspot 2 support heating above 1600C. Alternative = force feul & oxygen together 4 more heat, x: when burning coal w forced air. A structural fire w JP4/5 is the same. Get close to the heat & it vaporises & removes heat, until it mixes with fresh air 4 a flame, thus heat is decentralised w little chance of concentrating in steel structure fire.
A reason why steel used in WTCs, buildings designed to withstand this. Sue engineers too?
rebelforgod 3 years ago
Hey Genius barkracing02 I am really glad you are smarter than the engineers at NIST who stated they do not know how it happened. They should have just called you instead of doing test!
fake2 3 years ago 3
@barkracing02 You're so wrong it's laughable: ""The most commonly known flammable liquid is gasoline. It has a flash point of about -50° F (-65° C). The ignition temperature is about 495° F (232(232° C) [sic], a comparatively low figure."
And jet planes don't run on GASOLINE. Jet fuel is mostly KEROSENE. Good lord, how can you even post without cringing?
You need to completely fabricate 'science' to defend a weak position.
But listen to yourself. You'd burn another human alive for .... what?
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
"When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains--however improbable--must be the truth." Food for thought for all the naysayers, what exactly would burn at 5000 degrees for 6 hours if anything.....hmmmm Thermate/Thermite placed in these 3 buildings prior to 9/11. Do the research before you jump allover people who think for themselves bark. Thanks
shaunwild 3 years ago
Actually from what I read Thermate burns around 4,500 degrees. More than twice the melting point of steel.
johnknoefler 3 years ago
Its the same reason it would take forever for the heat to leave your oven after you turn it off...There was minimal to no ventilation. Heat builds up. Structural firefighting...check it out
barkracing02 3 years ago
If jet fuel burned at 5000 degrees, then would the jet engines not fail or melt when subjected to these high temperatures?
ve240 3 years ago 2
Jet fuel or Kerosene needs to be in a special fuel air mix to even heat steel to an orange glow. It's almost impossible to get to melting tempatures.
johnknoefler 3 years ago 2
You are correct, that is a poignant point, the logic ends with the same conclusion, it was not and never could be JET FUEL.
vespacurry 3 years ago 3
Hi vespacurry. I did some digging around on this and for what its worth heres what i learned:
Jet fuel has an open air burning temp of circa 287.5 °C. The steel members in the WTC's where allegedly heated by said fuel to 1,000°C.
Problem is thats a deficit of circa 712.5°C. So where did this extra 712.5c come from?
From what i can gather, there is no way jet fuel brought down the twin towers. No way at all. Unless of course i am missing something.
ve240 3 years ago
Giday ve240 I too have done my own Q&A and agree with your analyses, what I conclude is if the experts are silent or support this idea that 911 was executed by 15 Saudi men with box cutters, then they are involved or offering support to the conspiracy and must be seen as terrorists, as they have aided and with held evidence to a crime. These also Politicians world wide, including OZ NZ UK Canada. Ny point is the Parliament in Japan has stood up, these brave nobel men and women are true leaders.
vespacurry 3 years ago
greetings vespacurry. I aggree- put these turds in guantanamo bay & grease the guillotine!
ve240 3 years ago
Had not though of Guantanmo Bay, nice touch. You might like to look at Terror Storm, 77 was also an inside job. You may have heard about the Hijacking in New Zealand, really silly, it is pointing at an inside job. She looks to have been loaded with more than a knife. It might not be the case, but she didn't even pack her things, and the cab driver who dropped her off at the airport said she had no idea where she wanted to go. Hardly terrorist thinking, more like drugs or Hypnoses in my opinion.
vespacurry 3 years ago
Sad stuff vespacurry. I did a quick google on this and it seems she was mentally ill? That seemns to be the state media's attitude anyway. Only 7 months till Bush is out.
ve240 3 years ago
Mentally ill? Mouths before NZ tried to make changes to our liberties. Then this happened, the laws went through, all about security. I asked, she is mentally ill, she gets in a cab doesn't know where she wants to go, I quote the cab driver, ends up at a small airport with no security. Has a knife, coincidence. Then suddenly in mid flight takes it upon herself to stab the pilot and make demands to fly to Australia, it smell rotten to me. NZ Government ( Masons) have a past.
vespacurry 3 years ago
ATTENTION LIBTARDS AND OTHER IDIOTS!!!!
I , as a firefighter, get a huge kick out of watching you people and your theories of bombs bringing down the wtc but its all bullshit. What happened was what we in the bizz call a pancake collapse due to the steel weakening at the top floors of the buildings. "well the steel was heat treated" FALSE...it was coated with concrete and asbestos which all came off with the impact. see above comment for more
barkracing02 3 years ago
Good that someone does slow careful analysis
but, none of this explains 7WTC collapse 6 hours later, after 6 hours of confusion, during which NO PLANE hit 7WTC, nor could it
have been rigged for Demolition during that
confused 6 hours. So 7WTC came straight down
and had to be pre-wired, Silverstein admits giving permission to "pull" it, so it had to be PRE-wired days earlier.
INSIDE JOB. Period. Not Bin Laden job.
it was a Bin BUSH & CHENEY job.
IMPEACH & ARREST B. & C. Convict them.
superpencil007 3 years ago
You stupid fucking liberal. You just disproved your own theory. 6 HOURS is your answer homo. 6 hours of 3 thousand degree heat. Think about whats burning in those buildings, synthetic materials and petroleum products both of which burn really hot. There asshole now go get a job you lazy good for nothing liberal
barkracing02 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it is great to see how it falls down
louisdemeij 3 years ago
and also explain to me how this video is the only one i can find with those exploding noises in it
123456kfcforme 3 years ago
The south tower had 15% of its other and core columns severed and another 30% of them damaged, not to mention the fireproofing blown off of the rest of them and the weight of thirty floors pushing down. the madrid building was made of concrete encased steel columns, and concrete is a very good insulator.maybe if you could explain to me how they hid the bombs in the building then prevented them from exploding in the impact,and how they are silent explosions, then i would believe you
123456kfcforme 3 years ago
Now try it again with the real audio from that day. There were only male fire fighters standing there, then you hear women screaming. Then a man yells "Oh. my God." That man is Michael Hezarkhani, and the sopund is lifted from his video of the second plane strike. He filmed it from Battery Park on the top deck of a ferry moored near Castle Clinton.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
the largest building in spain just recently had the top ten floors in flames for over 24hrs, folowing was the entire building, they just let it burn. the whole thing was a smoldering skelleton but with its engineering and construction being neandertholithic in comparison it managed to stay standing
ericshanemacaulay 3 years ago
Why are these uneducated conspirasist retards allowed to post such rubbish!?!
DdanOR 3 years ago
Are you by any chance a bit afraid for the truth ?
1337h4xx0rZ 3 years ago
The truth and the mouths of uneducated fools like Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas and Korey Rowe are utter strangers.
People like Dave Von Kleist, Alex Jones, and Chris Bollyn sometimes (rarely) know the truth but do not give it to you unless they want to cover a bigger lie. The real truth would have them tarred and feathered for trying to start the RaHoWa. They're Nazis, trolling for useful idiots.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
you have something against nazis ?
1337h4xx0rZ 3 years ago
Nazis are worthless excuses for human beings. They want a race war, but know they do not have the numbers they need to pull it off. That's why they keep screaming that everything about 9/11 says that the Jews did it. They are trying to recruit useful idiots for the RaHoWa. I'm dead if they succede. That's why an old New Deal Democrat like me has firearms and a lot of ammo.
leftysergeant 3 years ago 2
Are you on drugs, or alcohol ?
1337h4xx0rZ 3 years ago
If you do not think that white mationalism is alive and well and evil and acring out, you live in a bubble of denial.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
I know what is going on dude.
1337h4xx0rZ 3 years ago
Are you aware of the fact that white nationalists are behind most of these whackjob theories? How many of them scream "Da Joooos done it." Nazis trolling for useful idiots. Read The Turner Diaries (remembering that this is a dystopian novel written by a dirtbag of no value to his society) and you will see that 9/11 was a windfall for the racist scum.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
I dont care man, take it easy.
1337h4xx0rZ 3 years ago
thats the floors and everything above crashing into whats below u moron conspirator, and those so called 'squibs' is from all the pressure built up inside from the collapse the air find the fastest way out which is to the sides
flipmasta14 3 years ago
Yes this video says truth!!...You can see explosion in each of 10.floors...by the way one plane can´t destroy the tower...It is impossible...
Pobikk 3 years ago
William Rodriguez's story is something to take seriously. If there are bombs and loud explosions in the basement that severed peoples limbs BEFORE plane impact look no further. The jet fuel down elevator shaft does not apply when the plane hasn't hit the building yet.
jcline87 3 years ago
By the way the audio in this video is very reall!! That is the sound it would make!!! The sound is floors collapsing on top of each other.
chrisksm1808 3 years ago
The audio on that first clip you showed is really fake by the way, dubbed over by a desperate conspiracy theorist. I've seen it raw myself. Ahhh who do we believe? O_o
bobhanchef 3 years ago
Why did you call the 1st clip audio fake? I am just asking for the proof. It does seem a little strange.
fake2 3 years ago 2
Prove it's fake, or waste your misguided patriotic efforts elsewhere.
estisfatuus 3 years ago
I don't give a shit about 9/11, I don't live in the states, and had nothing to do with it. I'm just saying I think that audio is fake, but I do still think there's too many unanswered questions.
bobhanchef 3 years ago
Seeing as you obviously have very little idea how to run the analysis program that you are using, i'll go easy:
You suck. You play a video thorough a program, and then point out some puffs of smoke caused by air pressure as a 500,000 tone building pushes air around. Then you look at the audio spectrum of the collapse as heard from a handheld camera, with people screaming in the backround, and you say that these little blips on the screen are evidence of explosions! Learn the program, then talk.
computerbed 4 years ago
You dont seem to know what your talking about idiot !
simo40 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Haven´t you ever seen a building collapsing??? You try to be a wiseguy and you show this crap with accoustic program or wateva... These small smoke puffs come out because of pressure... and so called "explosions" aren´t bombs... they´re electrical sources and generators or whatever exploding, and again, because of pressure... bombs don´t explode like this. they don´t make puffs like these shown in the video...
atheeza1989 4 years ago
there were no bombs you retards- its plain and simple hijacked planes loaded with jet fuel caused the destruction- there was no conspiracy except the one involving the terrorists-
Beanmaster73 4 years ago
P.S. Concrete does not turn to powdered dust unless enormous force is applied (explosive force!), far more than the force of gravity which is what they want us to believe caused the complete pulverization and segmentation of BOTH towers!!!
Wyndup 4 years ago 4
The debunkers are far to stupid to do the maths, so I will do it for them,
15 million insured, by 7 billion return=lying bastard larry
bushkilledtowers 4 years ago 2
THE NEXT 9/11
No one else is saying it ,
so lets say I am the 1st ,
The satellite is a nuclear missile and its going to hit Iran .
It is an attempt to start a nuclear war by CHEYNEY .
(It was just an accident , we had no control , it was just an accident , we are innocent )
Prey that I am mistaken
PYTHAGORAS101 4 years ago
I have no doubt we haven't seen anything yet, I sure hope I am wrong, but the wheels have been in motion, and Bush does whatever he wants anyway, so hold on, we are in for ww3, a war like we have never seen before.....
rockchucker21 4 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
A heavy concrete steel- frame structure pulverized in 8 seconds...Free fall speed, lack of gravity, basements blown up before the plane hit, bombs going off on all floors...Marvin Bush head of Securacom...Tell me no more...
Tihbialdunav 4 years ago 2
They say that the jet fuel burned at the impact levels hot enough to melt the supporting steel, which requires 2000 degrees F. Yet, you can see survivors peering out of the impact hole after the crash before the building collapse.
tomf429 4 years ago 2
There were the 2 Towers and Building 7 at the WTC that collapsed into their own footprints that day. Heat from the fires melting the steel at 2000 degrees is blamed. This has never happened before or since anywhere in the world - even with far hotter fires burning for many more hours. Yet, it happened at the 47-story Building 7 without a plane crashing into it. There are simply too many unanswered questions...
tomf429 4 years ago 2
...A gdy się skończy tysiąc lat, z więzienia swego szatan zostanie wyzwolony.
I wyjdzie, by omamić narody z czterech narożników ziem.
APOKALIPSA ŚW.JANA
WrednyBartek 4 years ago
You know who are the real losers. You people who after 7 years of unmitigated disaster continue to defend the lunatic in the White house as if he is some kind of hero instead of a morally corrupt facist enriching his filty rich buddies while innocents die all around.
lovepg 4 years ago
First off Im not sure why im trying to argue with idiots... but if there were explosives then you would have heard them. And there are other non-media tapes that confirms the sound of it collapsing... im pretty sure the US hasnt invented silent explosives yet. And im pretty sure the media isnt an appendage of the executive branch considering how critical they are of bush. You people are losers that prolly sit around ur mommas house and watch to many conspiracy movies. Grow a f---in brain.
Wormsofterror 4 years ago
mabey you should look up the REAL ID act, or mabey the North AMerican union, and you will think diffrent. you gotta have an open mind my friend, if you don't your going to be the first one with a mircochip into you, NWO is coming you better get ready
andyladousa 4 years ago
Well have fun with that...I feel sorry that you have wasted so much of your life...I have an open mind but not to stupidity, Have fun in your little fantasy world.
Wormsofterror 4 years ago
the collapse of the building's noises would mask the sound of the explosives. sounds of sirens and people screaming would also mask it, plus those floors are so high up that people wouldn't hear them
gurubomb 4 years ago
dude u have no idea how loud an explosion is. This isn't halo.
Wormsofterror 4 years ago
you have no idea how loud a falling building is. This isn't sim city.
gurubomb 4 years ago
nowhere near as loud as a controled demolition or a bomb.
TopSideUp 4 years ago
im not disagreeing with the fact that there was a bomb, im just saying to some kid, he has no idea how loud a falling building is
gurubomb 4 years ago
You honestly think they would make it obvious you goose!
Explosions going off in the core would be muffled by the enormous amount of noise from the falling debris, people just dont realise how big these things were and its easy to lose sight of the enormity of the collapse and the amount of debris...
Wyndup 4 years ago
Their were explosions in the sub levels that melted steel soon after the plane crash. The explanation was jet fuel running down the elevator shafts to the sub levels. However, surviving sub level employees and some first responders reported the smell of cordite.
tomf429 4 years ago
if you further an investigation, there were interviews of people who were there that did report they heard boom boom boom and several explosions..these interviews were snatched from the news and after the first day ...never aired again..How do you explain that? I'm just furthering my education on this? and the semetrical fall of the buildings? and I'm not an idiot, an idiot doesn't want to be educated....
ruthyatred 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ob's sturmt oder schneit,
Ob die Sonne uns lacht
Der Tag gluhend heiu
Oder eiskalt die Nacht
Bestaubt sind die Gesichter
Doch froh ist unser Sinn
Ist unser Sinn
Es braust unser Panzer
Im Sturmwind dahin
gorlitz88 4 years ago
The puff are the gasses being compressed by the falling floors. The flames in the other tower are because its on fire.
TheCottonTop 4 years ago
I thought the same thing but when I saw a different clip it showed there was a white puff from around the middle floor that was at least 30-40 floors below what was collapsing. Theres no way the compression from that many floors above caused that. In the sound quality it even sounds like a demolition.
brown55061 4 years ago
On studying dozens of clips, it becomes obvious that they used an interesting method of demo. (because they only had easy access to the center 47 columns, not the office space?) They fragmented the main columns as per normal, using cutting charges, but I think they also used centrally placed H.E. 'push' charges to 'push out' the floor plates which in turn pushed the outer steel cladding/framing out of column. That pulverized the concrete slab floors and created the huge squibs.
elyohcsrev 4 years ago
Its hard to guess whats happening inside...who knows, but explosions are loud, and explosions big enough to level a building that size would be like a fire cracker in silence of your back yard...in other words without a doubt u would know it was an explosion.
Wormsofterror 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Did the towers have a heating system? Thats what I thought....."Puff" on my cock! NO CONSPERICY!
gidsum29 4 years ago
Please spell ACOUSTIC right.
Hahahaha
jeffamarie 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is there a conspiracy regarding the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the towers? So why haven't we heard that in SIX YEARS? How can you analyze the physics of the impact without the distribution of steel and concrete thru the building? How many tons of steel can you heat to 1100 deg F in 56 minutes? Didn't the designers have to figure out what ot put on each level in the 1960s? see WTC Impact Model - MIT
psikeyhackr 4 years ago
3:56 - The puffs are coming out with "some pretty extreme pressures".
Too "extreme" to be from air pressure built up from pancaking floors as one of the most extreme office towers ever built collapses?
Does your brain allow for even the most remote possibility that the building collapsed without explosives on each floor?
yegreskin 4 years ago