I watch these reviews like a regular late-night t.v. program before bed. Sometimes i'm not even interested in what he is reviewing, I just like watching the reviews haha.
dude you should focus primarily on what you're reviewing as you are getting of track that you are making a video about canon and sigma lenses. I know you are trying to prove a point but its a bit way too much messing about and its irritating, especially for someone as DigitalRevTV - get to the point and spend 90% on what you're reviewing and 10% on nonsense if you like...
@Oggmaster Don't take their review too bloody serious, besides this was their early videos from last year. They're getting more serious on this year videos, trust me :)
Hi Kai, please make a review also of the Tamron 70-200mm 2.8 against the Sigma 70-200 2.8 both in NON VR, OS or VC on I know many people would probably love hearing it specially from you.
I wish you did a comparison with the nikon 70-200mm 2.8 vrII vs the sigma. The Sigma has a rebate now making it $1250 way down from when it first came out $1600. What held me is what your saying- the softness. I do portraits and this I am affraid will kill it.
@MrAshura05 Because that would be a useless comparison.
It would only please the fanboys who likes to furiously discuss the Canon vs Nikon battle.
It is not like anyone has a choice between the two lenses.
If you own a Canon DSLR you buy the canon version. It would be stupid to try to fit the Nikon version onto it with glue wouldn't it? You would buy the Canon version even if tests showed that the Nikon was marginally better. And vice versa of cause.
ok ok hold on love your reviews ..usually ... just been to my local shop and tried this lens it felt VERY well built on a par with the £1600 Nikon equal and was great optically even pixel peeping ....... seems we have some bias seeping in here guys ... the lens was great and VFM wise stripped the Nikon bare and fer the info in UK when you quote pounds it is in fact 1000
I'm curious as to who regulates the DigitalRevCom channel and videos. I don't think it would be Kai... It makes me laugh when people comment, "hey kai..."
could you guys please do a review on the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens , not the new one with red ring or whatever , the old one . i'm seriously considering buying it for my zoom lens , and i wanna see what you guys think about it . i'm still a beginner and i hope you guys can help me out.
I'm lucky enough to work at a studio and I get to use all types of gear. As for canon vs sigma, if you zoom into 100% and look really really hard, you will see the canon just has the edge on sharpness.
Hmmmm!! maybe if you and others have to zoom into 100% to appreciate the photograph, then maybe it's time to give up photography.
have tried both several times, and the Canon is a bit sharper at f/2,8...but that is easily fixed in photoshop...$1200 difference made it easy for me choosing...I have the Sigma, which, by the way, won the EISA award 2011.
the $1200 I can use on the Canon EF 135mm f/2 instead....
Okay so the canon is slightly better....... so it must be worth double the price should it? I love canon, got a 5D MKii and always said to myself I will only buy canon gear. But when you got companies like Canon and Nikon who dominate the camera market, they have the mentality of charging an insane amount because they think people dont have anyone where else to go. Iam glad Sigma is trying their best to compete. In my opinion this lens is great value with amazing performance.
Ok. I need a f2.8 lens and and for it too be 70-200mm. I can't afford canons 70-200 f2.8 is II. Would u know how much would the canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS version 1 cost?? Or should I go with the tamron 70-200 f2.8 or the sigma 70-200 2.8. I do alot of weddings. What lens should I go for, to shoot weddings. Should I save for the canon 70-200 version 1? Or go with the cheaper tamron or sigma. Plz reply thanks I love ur videos
Who is gonna use these lenses wide open? the max quality is at F 5.6. these are not portrait lenses.You use only a portraitlens wide open and for the quality and nothing else.
@empot789 theyre both gonna give you great results. the canon would probably be SLIGHTLY better at fast shutter speeds, but if you're going to do lots of handheld shots in potentialy dark/semi-dark environments the sigma may be a better investment for the money. you may also want to consider tamron if you're short on cash cause they're 70-200 seems pretty solid as well
@empot789 theyre both gonna give you great results. the canon would probably be SLIGHTLY better at fast shutter speeds, but if you're going to do lots of handheld shots in potentialy dark/semi-dark environments the sigma may be a better investment for the money. you may also want to consider tamron if you're short on cash cause they're 70-200 seems pretty solid as well
@empot789 theyre both gonna give you great results. the canon would probably be SLIGHTLY better at fast shutter speeds, but if you're going to do lots of handheld shots in potentialy dark/semi-dark environments the sigma may be a better investment for the money. you may also want to consider tamron if you're short on cash cause they're 70-200 seems pretty solid as well
If the models spoke a little bit more than just "Hi!" and "OK!", when you give them money, it would definetely feel better. This way they're just another mindless prop on the stage.
For the new reduced price of $750, the sigma is the better buy. You could buy the sigma lens and Photoshop CS5 and still pay less than the canon 70-200.
what if we have crop sensor on our cameras. That deals with most of the vignetting and sharpness in the corners? As I see it, on a crop sensor, theese two lenses are neck to neck
Awesome comparison. This one I've been waiting. But seriously. Can a kit be more disgraceful? I mean: Sigma lens, Canon body and Nikon neck-strap! Un-holy! =)
i just got the sigma and if you are looking for an inexpensive 70-200 2.8 sigma is the way to go, great quality for hardly anything, 600 bucks american.... i love mine but will one day go up to the nikon or canon version whichever i shoot with when im better
@alindayu Yeah. Especially the Canon. But I'm a Nikon user so I'm probably gonna go for the Sigma instead of the Nikkor equivalent. I have have a hunch it's just as expensive as the L lens.
As great as the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II USM truly is, keep in mind that it is $1000 more than the Sigma. For that grand in savings, the Sigma really does perform quite well.
You're obviously very biased towards Canon then!! The Sigma, for the price looks like a good alternative, besides, the majority that watch these videos are amateurs or hobbyists not always professional photographers
@805coach highly recommend it. I have done some action shots for my local highschool, they turned out great. if you have the money, and enjoy taking photos go for it.
i will not be buying a $3000 Lens when i am not making money from taking photos, PERIOD! Sigma would be the best alternative, at $1200 for a 2.8 how can you go wrong?
Kinky 13:01 :D
MarkA15 1 day ago
Comment removed
MarkA15 1 day ago
I watch these reviews like a regular late-night t.v. program before bed. Sometimes i'm not even interested in what he is reviewing, I just like watching the reviews haha.
JamesPGable 3 days ago 3
WHY USE AN NIKON HOLDER FOR A CANON CAMERA (NO MONEY MAN ) AND DON'T EVER PLEASE EXCHANGE LENS WITHOUT POWER OFF THE CAMERA MAN
EVERYTHING ELSE GREAT
elio367 5 days ago
OMG THE ONE MODELS HAIR IS SO PRETTY! IM SO JELLY RIGHT NOW. O.O
AliCatt777 5 days ago
$63100 in US DOLLARS?!?!?!!?!?
sosvocaloid 6 days ago
dude you should focus primarily on what you're reviewing as you are getting of track that you are making a video about canon and sigma lenses. I know you are trying to prove a point but its a bit way too much messing about and its irritating, especially for someone as DigitalRevTV - get to the point and spend 90% on what you're reviewing and 10% on nonsense if you like...
Oggmaster 1 week ago
@Oggmaster Don't take their review too bloody serious, besides this was their early videos from last year. They're getting more serious on this year videos, trust me :)
looniaz 5 days ago
HELAL BUDA TRABZONSPOR LU
61mutlu61 1 week ago
What camera did you guys use to film this video. It looks real clear. Please reply info.
Thank you
New Fan here
NYPLAYA05 1 week ago
@NYPLAYA05
5D Mark II
audhen1 1 week ago
does anyone noticed at the beginning when he said
"top secret UNDERGROUND vip bunker on a TOP FLOOR"?
siuol0002 1 week ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
Making me hungry
kk6downing 3 weeks ago
Hi Kai, please make a review also of the Tamron 70-200mm 2.8 against the Sigma 70-200 2.8 both in NON VR, OS or VC on I know many people would probably love hearing it specially from you.
Thank you - alfred
digitaleyesights 4 weeks ago 4
Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS vs Canon 70-200 f4 IS please
Mubble 1 month ago
@Mubble /watch?v=TtODT5jJMHo&feature=relmfu
There you go! :)
norauu 2 days ago
@norauu - Cheers dude!
Mubble 17 hours ago
Kai is the ladies man!
MrSwiftAzn 1 month ago
It's kinky!!
tobearockstar0706 1 month ago
Hahahaha 10:17 "oh no, big lady in the way!"
Richpence 1 month ago
Nikon really makes GooD.....Straps! :-)
pepckat 1 month ago
You should have included 70-200mm Tamron lens in this review, isn`t it?
loco039 1 month ago
u should do the battle for 70-200 2.8 tamron, sigma, canon and nikon :)
pmmj 1 month ago 27
@pmmj ThatNikonGuy did the sigma tamron and nikon. 4 part series...
LowCountryWild 2 weeks ago
13:20 "Eagle -bay" looool
11Elevon 1 month ago
@11Elevon Evil-Bay
kk6downing 3 weeks ago
how can I trust a guy that gives all his money so girls can go shopping? lol
mjeffbr 1 month ago
Nice.. Go the Peak tram lol....
Dansshortclips 1 month ago
Comment removed
Dansshortclips 1 month ago
great.. i came here for a lens review, now i'm hungry
djlaxa 1 month ago
Comment removed
badlakan 1 month ago
Those girls said bye not we'll be back. That cash was gone lol.
Whatisright 1 month ago
takes all the bags, leave the hermes one, lol nub.
Would be nice to have the same picture with both lense, close to each other so we can easily see the difference. thx!
RaiZdOe 1 month ago
didnt u worry your miror get dust when changing lens with that way , kai?
bayudetruth 1 month ago
The Canon definitely did well... You get what you pay for. I would love to leave my good job to intern for this show...lol
agnosticautonomy 1 month ago
"Oh look there's a guy taking a shit on the pavement" ROFL!
11Elevon 1 month ago
@11Elevon ha...ha...
cliooz55 1 month ago
What the hell type of yay screetch was that?
RyanSomelofske 2 months ago
I wish you did a comparison with the nikon 70-200mm 2.8 vrII vs the sigma. The Sigma has a rebate now making it $1250 way down from when it first came out $1600. What held me is what your saying- the softness. I do portraits and this I am affraid will kill it.
prmass1 2 months ago
11:08
cornsyben 2 months ago
Will the sigma work on a d5100?
refusedchaos 2 months ago
@refusedchaos
yes
zseartcc25 2 months ago
Ah one of Kai's funniest vids............
pabloe7 2 months ago
They are gorgeous!! :-)
I mean the girls, not the lenses of course ;-))
HM99AA 2 months ago
Two hot girls shopping underwear, some comparison from would have been nice
Mannertheman 2 months ago
Kinky is so kinky, lol
iCravethis 2 months ago
Comment removed
iCravethis 2 months ago
I thought he walked out the shop with a lens. Realised it's alcohol, for KAI, to drink. :)
NFphotography14 2 months ago
Comment removed
iOtameganeKun 2 months ago
Nice nikon strap lol
BorislavX 2 months ago
I would do unspeakable things to kinky
RockLe3 2 months ago
How good it this guys job...
hardaker44 2 months ago
Oh no why don't you just compare canon with nikon instead
MrAshura05 2 months ago
@MrAshura05 Because that would be a useless comparison.
It would only please the fanboys who likes to furiously discuss the Canon vs Nikon battle.
It is not like anyone has a choice between the two lenses.
If you own a Canon DSLR you buy the canon version. It would be stupid to try to fit the Nikon version onto it with glue wouldn't it? You would buy the Canon version even if tests showed that the Nikon was marginally better. And vice versa of cause.
dude2106 2 months ago
jajajaajajajaaaaaa loko you ,bless.
luddjass 2 months ago
lol niceee your the best!! keep up the greet work!!! KIAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH LOL
TheCrazy88tony 2 months ago
lol your show sounds like top gear
cb1021 2 months ago
what music did you use in the end?
humza8b 2 months ago
Fewer married people, not less.
Sorry - being a pedant.
Great video though - keep up the good work!
Radders123 2 months ago
That bottle wasn't Krug - the bottle was the wrong shape.
Radders123 2 months ago
Kai is awesome!hahaha
TheShanahg 3 months ago
empty shopping bags?
adzrinmansor 3 months ago
Comment removed
adzrinmansor 3 months ago
I couldn't afford a 70-200 2.8 mk II.. But I did buy a mk I ... Is it still good with a 60d?
dragonfire121 3 months ago
@dragonfire121 thats a great combo (you prob wanted a response from digitalrev haha)
chubsnellie 2 months ago
@chubsnellie Lol that's fine ;). I just got a 24-70 2.8 and it's much more easier to shoot a vast variety of things than the 70-200
dragonfire121 1 month ago
DAMN ILL BE SHOOTING ALL DAY WITH THEM GIRLS!!
MTerenyi 3 months ago
this guy is great!
tokyogarden225 3 months ago
Why kai is always use nikon strap on canon camera :lol:
MrOner13 3 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews 53
@MrOner13 Obviously the canon works better with a nikon strap its like that video pro lens + cheapo body vs pro body + cheapo lens
S4LPilseung 3 months ago in playlist More videos from DigitalRevCom
@MrOner13 haha! you use Troll Emo? I can clearly tell haha :yuno:
TheShanahg 3 months ago
@MrOner13
nikon fan boy :O
TheDevilHanG 2 months ago
@MrOner13 nikon fan boy
iSaadG1994Eqla3 2 months ago
@MrOner13 Because it's funnier that way.
Hickeydog2365 1 month ago
ok ok hold on love your reviews ..usually ... just been to my local shop and tried this lens it felt VERY well built on a par with the £1600 Nikon equal and was great optically even pixel peeping ....... seems we have some bias seeping in here guys ... the lens was great and VFM wise stripped the Nikon bare and fer the info in UK when you quote pounds it is in fact 1000
2FoG2 3 months ago
I'm curious as to who regulates the DigitalRevCom channel and videos. I don't think it would be Kai... It makes me laugh when people comment, "hey kai..."
PeeWeeLeagueGaming 3 months ago
could you guys please do a review on the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens , not the new one with red ring or whatever , the old one . i'm seriously considering buying it for my zoom lens , and i wanna see what you guys think about it . i'm still a beginner and i hope you guys can help me out.
Vans2395 3 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
What camera and lens do you use to film these?
bayoyong 3 months ago
@bayoyong i know that they use a canon 5d mark II. I am not sure about the lens though.
korp96 3 months ago
@bayoyong they use the Canon 5D mkII with the Canon 24-105mm f4L is
CarlosTheTaco 3 months ago
Kai W, I'm your fan!
natanaellorenzi5 3 months ago
oh my. i just bought the canon and had the nagging doubt, "couldn't i just get the sigma for half the price?" oh man am i glad i went with the canon!
ShuPortraits 3 months ago
Nice moddels
helthuismartin 3 months ago
Why do you never use lens hoods?
Margus81 3 months ago
Why is this guy using strap nikon canon machine
griressam 3 months ago
@griressam Because he's a Nikon fan-boy.
Starsonedge 3 months ago
Rich bastards.
Skatrav 3 months ago
@Skatrav i think they are a dealer in hong kong for camera equipment since they are on ebay.
evonecc 3 months ago
@evonecc Yeah, they sell on their website and I've seen them on eBay, but 40,000 POUNDS! F***!
Skatrav 3 months ago
I'm lucky enough to work at a studio and I get to use all types of gear. As for canon vs sigma, if you zoom into 100% and look really really hard, you will see the canon just has the edge on sharpness.
Hmmmm!! maybe if you and others have to zoom into 100% to appreciate the photograph, then maybe it's time to give up photography.
usanineoneone 3 months ago
What a badass... has a nikon strap on a Canon... Oooooo!!
SupratechMEDIA 3 months ago
dear kai when you get sick of your job give me a call i'm sure i can quit my job and find time to do yours
Benn044 4 months ago
10:18 "Oh no, big lady in the way..."
Enrikerfca 4 months ago 31
Comment removed
dongbuka 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Enrikerfca Oh yes, just only thin lady in my lens
dongbuka 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
have tried both several times, and the Canon is a bit sharper at f/2,8...but that is easily fixed in photoshop...$1200 difference made it easy for me choosing...I have the Sigma, which, by the way, won the EISA award 2011.
the $1200 I can use on the Canon EF 135mm f/2 instead....
MacLeod1905 4 months ago
Okay so the canon is slightly better....... so it must be worth double the price should it? I love canon, got a 5D MKii and always said to myself I will only buy canon gear. But when you got companies like Canon and Nikon who dominate the camera market, they have the mentality of charging an insane amount because they think people dont have anyone where else to go. Iam glad Sigma is trying their best to compete. In my opinion this lens is great value with amazing performance.
Cman775 4 months ago
"oh look this guy taking shit in the pavement" I lol'd so hard
8element 4 months ago
The Canon poops on the Sigma from a great height. :)
yrahcaz41194 4 months ago
33 person don't like "nikon strap canon body"
photodimebag 4 months ago
Ok. I need a f2.8 lens and and for it too be 70-200mm. I can't afford canons 70-200 f2.8 is II. Would u know how much would the canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS version 1 cost?? Or should I go with the tamron 70-200 f2.8 or the sigma 70-200 2.8. I do alot of weddings. What lens should I go for, to shoot weddings. Should I save for the canon 70-200 version 1? Or go with the cheaper tamron or sigma. Plz reply thanks I love ur videos
mervie17 4 months ago
canon dslr +canon lense = stupidly excellent
canon dslr +sigma lense =stupid
eizlez 4 months ago
man they were some really expensive empty bags!
tomjayzen 4 months ago
whats with the nikon 70-200mm ?!
razor12370 4 months ago
"lolol nikon strap canon body" Stop talking about this, watch the other videos and then you'll get it!
exconigor 4 months ago
Awesome Review with Awesome Girlzzzz!!! That Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II is the best. Gonna have one someday.
mcdus78 4 months ago
Sounds like the narrator from top gear :)
xboxsamurai8 4 months ago
thows gerls giv me a stiffy [=
iamfunking 4 months ago
this guy is wayyy too picky
bustmust 4 months ago
Since when u use a Nikon strap on a Canon Body?
smahesan 4 months ago
This is not a test.,this is debunking Sigma.
helthuismartin 4 months ago in playlist Video's die door helthuismartin aan de favorieten zijn toegevoegd
Who is gonna use these lenses wide open? the max quality is at F 5.6. these are not portrait lenses.You use only a portraitlens wide open and for the quality and nothing else.
helthuismartin 4 months ago in playlist Video's die door helthuismartin aan de favorieten zijn toegevoegd
LOL @ the nikon strap on the canon cam... Great video though.
shmew22 4 months ago
wow i never realised this but your models sound like rats
great review however
piinkpandahh69 4 months ago
actually i don't like sigma, a cheaper one is cheap for some reason
Sadwindlee 5 months ago
HAHAHA, this was a great review Kai!
Anton338 5 months ago
Why in the world you have a nikon strap on a canon body @? ask you boss if he can provide more budget ..
kuvellion 5 months ago
Comment removed
sweetclassickix 5 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
Comment removed
sweetclassickix 5 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
one of the best videos i enjoy every second of it
Turtlecover2 5 months ago
70-200mm sigma or canon w/o IS?? i have a limited resources so i'm going to be money wise..
empot789 5 months ago
@empot789 theyre both gonna give you great results. the canon would probably be SLIGHTLY better at fast shutter speeds, but if you're going to do lots of handheld shots in potentialy dark/semi-dark environments the sigma may be a better investment for the money. you may also want to consider tamron if you're short on cash cause they're 70-200 seems pretty solid as well
DisIsHowiRoll 5 months ago
@empot789 theyre both gonna give you great results. the canon would probably be SLIGHTLY better at fast shutter speeds, but if you're going to do lots of handheld shots in potentialy dark/semi-dark environments the sigma may be a better investment for the money. you may also want to consider tamron if you're short on cash cause they're 70-200 seems pretty solid as well
DisIsHowiRoll 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@empot789 theyre both gonna give you great results. the canon would probably be SLIGHTLY better at fast shutter speeds, but if you're going to do lots of handheld shots in potentialy dark/semi-dark environments the sigma may be a better investment for the money. you may also want to consider tamron if you're short on cash cause they're 70-200 seems pretty solid as well
DisIsHowiRoll 5 months ago
If the models spoke a little bit more than just "Hi!" and "OK!", when you give them money, it would definetely feel better. This way they're just another mindless prop on the stage.
Jacob011 5 months ago 2
Nikon strap, canon camera?
jajaja
locosrayo 5 months ago
@locosrayo Love it! Im going to get a Nikon strap for my canon just to take the piss to i recon!
Rallyant 5 months ago in playlist Camera stuff
What an idiot,What do you think the lenshood is for?
helthuismartin 5 months ago
Hi Kinky.... Hi Peggy..... :-)
iwousa 5 months ago
haha.. LOL at the sound of the Model screaming.. YHEAAHH!!
hauzel1 6 months ago
For the new reduced price of $750, the sigma is the better buy. You could buy the sigma lens and Photoshop CS5 and still pay less than the canon 70-200.
NRoque88 6 months ago
what if we have crop sensor on our cameras. That deals with most of the vignetting and sharpness in the corners? As I see it, on a crop sensor, theese two lenses are neck to neck
markopuljic 6 months ago
Time to do the NEW Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX OS HSM lens ? and maybe the new
Sigma 50-150 2.8 ex OS HSM lens ?
rhykko77 6 months ago 17
@rhykko77
110 % agree with that. would love to see them both and how they compare with canon
paul11218 5 months ago
@rhykko77 It is the new one. Pay attention.
rosselur 4 months ago
@rosselur Right you are ! .....rude but right.
rhykko77 4 months ago
Brilliant review, some of your best work, hilarious!
jamesHDSLR 6 months ago
stop confusing consumers by mixing a nikon strap with a white canon lens and body!
GeneralCupcakes 6 months ago
Could you please compare the sigma 24-70mm against the canon 24-70mm?
thanks
fcarr91 6 months ago
i can buy lots of denim and nikes with that money... JK
darkraiden23 6 months ago
Is there anyway you could make a review video on the Tamron 70-200mm macro?
daboi77 6 months ago
did he say herpes?
naignik 7 months ago
Haha you crack me up! Nice review. I'm saving up for a the canon now. :)
Thanks!
joednoodles 7 months ago
Nikon strap on a Canon!? Somethings wrong with this..
MrPhotographical 7 months ago
Awesome comparison. This one I've been waiting. But seriously. Can a kit be more disgraceful? I mean: Sigma lens, Canon body and Nikon neck-strap! Un-holy! =)
More comparison vids! Love it!
-W-
Wistbacka 7 months ago in playlist Canon L Lenses
really great! what you did. with your video keep going like that
alexannaferry 7 months ago
i just got the sigma and if you are looking for an inexpensive 70-200 2.8 sigma is the way to go, great quality for hardly anything, 600 bucks american.... i love mine but will one day go up to the nikon or canon version whichever i shoot with when im better
gojohnson48 7 months ago
40000 pounds to make youtube vids? don't get me wrong I adore this channel but 40000!!
UFOJeroen 7 months ago 2
@UFOJeroen It's like screaming "it's over 9000!!!!!!!!!!!" classic xD if you get what I mean...
AldossariEOS 7 months ago 2
great vids real fun to watch
mssphotography 7 months ago
super hot models
alindayu 7 months ago
@alindayu Yeah. Especially the Canon. But I'm a Nikon user so I'm probably gonna go for the Sigma instead of the Nikkor equivalent. I have have a hunch it's just as expensive as the L lens.
JanErikEdvartsen 7 months ago
we've seen many 70-200 2.8 lenses and now it's time for Tamron I think
funtube99999 7 months ago
YOUR REVIEW IS AWESOME! BUT PLEASE STOP USING NIKON STRAP ON CANON STRATOSPHERE BODY IT'S UGLY! I REALLY DON'T LIKE YELLOW STRAP!
somuch2see 7 months ago
sigma is a f2.5? so it says on the info on the pics. fail maybe?
toggomusic 7 months ago
I just bought the Sigma lens. For the price and performance. I can't complain. Plus, OS which I need for video.
ecliptic1101 7 months ago
As great as the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II USM truly is, keep in mind that it is $1000 more than the Sigma. For that grand in savings, the Sigma really does perform quite well.
BTPhotography1 7 months ago
Do you want to go shopping?
-EEEEEEK
xD
BOTx5 7 months ago
You're obviously very biased towards Canon then!! The Sigma, for the price looks like a good alternative, besides, the majority that watch these videos are amateurs or hobbyists not always professional photographers
seagalinvestigations 8 months ago
...The Canon is twice the price lets not forget.
TerryWillard 8 months ago
WHEN EVER I FEEL BORD I SWITCH ON TO KAI VIDEOS.....
333222107 8 months ago 27
Did you guys actually use the money? I'm really curious.
altoidfart 8 months ago
I got a 7d and the canon 70-200 f\2.8L is II. :)
hmoshref 8 months ago
@hmoshref
how do you like your set up and have you used it to take photos of sports, i am thinking of getting the same set up, thanks in advance
805coach 8 months ago
@805coach highly recommend it. I have done some action shots for my local highschool, they turned out great. if you have the money, and enjoy taking photos go for it.
hmoshref 8 months ago
@hmoshref Great combination.
BTPhotography1 7 months ago
why the tripod ring is up side down for the sigma?
stephengperez 8 months ago
@stephengperez I think it was mounted wrong, wasn't it? ;)
Schmidtkord 8 months ago
@stephengperez you can rotate the ring
madCR8tionz 7 months ago
@stephengperez
You can actually get rigs where the the camera is hanging underneath.
ExhaustedFX 7 months ago
Why do you put Nikon straps on canon and canon strap on nikon?
hayden120ful 8 months ago
it must be awesome to have money!!!
UtopiaMinor666 8 months ago
thats guy is takng a shit :)
luissantos84 8 months ago
@Unbee why Not und buying for 1500?
pogolol09 8 months ago
i will not be buying a $3000 Lens when i am not making money from taking photos, PERIOD! Sigma would be the best alternative, at $1200 for a 2.8 how can you go wrong?
MYTRB 8 months ago