people just don't know anything about honda.. in less than 10 years the from a 16 seconds running into the 7s.. power of honda... not to mention they rule at everything else.. take honda superbike for example.. they make everything.. even ur power generator
My mom's '03 Durango would kill that rice burning little waste of metal....my mustang would just plain murder it....all those things are good for are taking up space and making hot girls look hotter. Gotta give my respect to the tuners though, I respect them but just not my cup of tea.
No fucking shit weight is a factor.... so is traction,gearing,powerband,hp,tq,the faggit driving......My point was that this mustang has an engine many times bigger than the one in the civic and the civic still pulled... now i know weight matters but you'd imagine a 5.0L v8 could still beat a 1.6L inline four that weighs only 300-400lbs less. But apparently it can't. Thats because mustangs blow cock and loses to toy cars like this one all the time.
No.... This is obviously not one of their sports cars. It just so happens their ecobox civic can pull on it. Its not like honda tried to make the civic faster than the mustang. They are in completly different markets. Its just so funny that their ecobox by chance is as fast as a 5.0 mustang gt foxbody which was made to be a sports car and not an ecobox. But yet it can't handle 1.6L of economy lol
Well its fords fault for putting the same dated engine in their shitstang year after year while the rest of the cars advanced out of the 70's. Then when they finally do change engines they decided to switch over to a 4.6L shitty SOHC with just 2 valves that was first introduced in the lincoln towncar.
@RIEKSONE Are you mentally de-arranged? Do you have even the slightest clue of what Honda has achieved? They made one of the best fucking F1 engines, the fuck has your redneck shit made? A new 35hp lawnmower that can tow your trailer home around? Fuck head, learn some shit before you decide to talk.
Your brakes aren't bad its just the way Mustangs are built. I used to road race a 01 GT with stock brakes and suspension and it was dangerous to race. Completely unpredictable. Ford engineered suspensions are an afterthought on those cars.
@getyourballzup It was a class that required stock parts (except for a few bolt on engine modifications) And there was more than one race I entered. The best finish was 5th out of 21, worst was 17th out of 21. I ran the same class one weekend with a FWD Eclipse and won twice in a row. And also won with an AWD Talon. I owned non of the cars I raced. I race owners cars for them.
@psi2hi Yeah I just didnt see anyone putting a stock mustang in a road race. I bet that AWD Talon was a Beast in the curves. Mustang are just one of those cars like many, they have to be modded to get good quality performance.
@psi2hi Well ford puts the live rear in them. They are built for drag racing not road racing. I'm surprised they still haven't moved on to the independent rear yet. Although the live rear is way easier to tune for drag racing and easier to get the weight on launch to where you want it.
@jimmybrown11111 its actualy a 99-00. the body style changes after that for 01-05, and this is definitely a 99-00, or 96-98 with a 99-00 front bumper and headlights, and tail lights. but i know what you're saying. have it race its own year and see who wins.
Cobdope175, can you please type in English? I could only understand a few words that you had written. You wrote, "unnecassarily" words. The rest of the words you had written were correctly spelled, but the way they were arranged was difficult to understand...something about you being really high and your car and that after your boyfriend pulled out you farted? I don't understand what point you were trying to make.
i did a little bit of research and the only difference between a regular civic and the SI is that the factory tells the computer in the car to allow it to go faster.
@Tophairybutt you can beat what ever you want to beat... its up to you how you drive and how much money and work you put into it be realistic -_- i have beat many hondas around and they have beat me to
@Tophairybutt Your unavoidably dumb. Take ANY stock Mustang, Camaro, or any other American muscle, against ANY stock Honda, Toyota, or whatever else, I guarantee you the American will come out on top. Even with all the pointless plastic spoilers that go unnecassarily high in the air or the exhausts you buy off ebay that don't do anything but make your car fart.
@cobdude175 Are you serious? Those companies make more than just a civic and a camry. Here is a list of cars they do just fine against American counterparts. EVO, WRX STI, Supra, NSX, RX7, S2000, Celica (AWD version), 3000GT VR4.... I could go on but I got shit to do.
@Cripton805 What do you think a stock mustang gets for gas mileage compared to a modified civic or even a stock STI? Seriously. I have gotten over 30mpg to a tank with my 5.0. After 20 years of designing cars especially for rally's, its about time they get a car faster then a stock mustang with 100,000 miles on it. Civics are not performance vehicles. They are grocery getters and daily drivers. Just like a mustang.
@1pwNz0mb13Z Funny. I would always think that a longer wheelbase with a limited by cv axle clearance front suspension just screams good handling car. Do you know what a rally even is? Ever been to a dirt track race? Its dominated by inline 4 mustangs and turbo chickens, not front wheel drive fart cannons. Gee I wonder why. I also seriously doubt that the car in this video is a mustang at all. Its easy to say your beat a mustang when there is not proof and a shitty cell phone video with 3fps.
haha, i dont know what kind of pussy rallies ur talking about but REAL rallies are dominated by Japanese and European cars... including the type-R civic,
ive NEVER seen some crappy American muscle car in a rally or a circuit race at all,
stop wasting ur life with NASCAR and driving in straight lines and learn about the WTCC, BTCC, WRC, DTM, Super GT's
Once again you dont know SHIT about real cars and racing
@1pwNz0mb13Z LMAO, he told you he designs rally cars? this same fucktard told me a 200hp 1986 stang runs a 14.1 1/4 mile stock. I was right he does go around YouTube makin shit up.
Learn to drive a real car, and just about anything can get into the 25+mpg range. A fuel injected car with 2.73 gears and overdrive kicks the shit out of a little 4 banger. I drove about 200 miles a day, mostly freeway and got 600+ miles to a tank a couple of times. I averaged about 27-28mpg, more or less depending on how much I romped on it.
21 city/26 hwy Stang with the smallest engine. How much do you think that 8 was burning? More than new trucks. We're not talking a 2011 GT 5.0. This is the early 90's.
You're a dumbass. Even other Mustang owners can argue with you. You're even lucky to get 20mpg Highway.
My own personal little 4 banger has the ability to hang or beat your "big bad" 5.0
I have an Integra GSR. Don't believe me? Do some research. Nuff said.
@Cripton805 Hey, when you learn to drive a car let me know. You can have twice the engine working half as hard, or you can have half the engine working twice as hard. My car idles at 600rpm. Yours is 1000 or more. right there your i-4 is using about or more gas then my v-8. At my 1200RPM cruising speed, compared to your, what 3000rpm? Which do you think uses more fuel? Fastest I've ever seen someone run in a stock GSR around here is a 16.3. Even a new driver pulls 15's in a stock mustang.
@lilsammywasapunkrock You're a complete idiot if you think you have better gas milage. And lose 100% credibility if you think they idle at 1000k. It's really obvious I know more about the car YOU drive. You don't even deserve to be on the road. I can go a whole day without hitting 3.5k
Even funnier that you say they work twice as hard and they usually last twice as long... Damn now that's funny shit
When did I say it would last longer? I have owned several 302's with well over 200K though. Every i-4 I've driven has idled at 1000rpm or more. And it is working twice as hard. My car shifts before you hit v-tec. Makes a ton more power, at much lower RPM"S. I can go weeks without hitting 2k.Your right, I'm not an expert on your car. But when I call you out on how fast it is, out of no where now your sure that it will get much better mileage. It better, being almost 1/3rd the size.
@Cripton805 And by the way, I just looked up a GSR gear ration chart and mapped it. At 66mph you should be at 3250RPM assuming you have stock sized tires, in 5th gear and the 4.4 final drive ratio. So your right, you COULD go all day without hitting 70mph. I don't know about where you live, but I have speed limits at 75 here. And you were right about idle speed. I guess your idle should be the same as mine, at around 650RPM's.
@lilsammywasapunkrock Yeah. I live in a city and even if its running at 3250 I have a much higher redline, so that means nothing at all. 3250 on the Mustang would mean it would be forcing it alot more than my engine. Still point proven. You should've researched on your gas milage instead of spending all that time finding stuff that is irrelevant to the gas milage because that is what you're getting to
I live in a city as well. Occasionally I actually drive my car somewhere else too though. I know what I get for gas mileage. You don't seem to though. I just said I had a 5.0. Your gear ratio has alot to do with gas mileage, as well as RPM's. Higher you rev, the more gas you use. I drive a 5.0 87 thunderbird. Basically the same engine, with worse heads, intake and camshaft that flows less. It was rated at 27 hwy in 87 with the same fuel management systems and transmission and rear.
@lilsammywasapunkrock Go to edmunds and look up one of the cons for a 90 Mustang 5.0 LX or GT. One the cons is "gas milage." I guess if you commute every single day and use a 5.0 to travel everyday then I guess it might be possible to get 27mpg which would be dog on rare and if your car was to stock spec and you drove 50mph on 5th w/ no passangers. Ill send you a link
@Cripton805 my 88 LX with 3.73's got probably 22-23 mpg on the highway, I used to take it on long trips all the time. That was doing 65-75mph even with thsoe gears. Motor had bolt on's.
@lilsammywasapunkrock Yeah. I live in a city and even if its running at 3250 I have a much higher redline, so that means nothing at all. 3250 on the Mustang would mean it would be forcing it alot more than my engine. Still point proven. You should've researched on your gas milage instead of spending all that time finding stuff that is irrelevant to the gas milage because that is what you're getting to
@lilsammywasapunkrock With my 1986 5.0 GT, back in the day, we went to Florida for spring break, with 3 in the car, loaded with gear, with 3.08 rear end and 160 thermostat, still got 27mpg @ 70mph the whole way down and back. $44 in gas each way. Cheap as heck back then...
@marcomariaz26 This guy lost 100% credibility. Don't listen to his lies. Somehow this guy has surpassed every other Mustang owner in MPG and even states that he got way better MPG than what even ford puts on the sticker on a new car at the time. Even ford tried to put a high MPG, but not as much as this idiot claims.
@marcomariaz26 Hey guy, remember, no mustang ever hit 20mpg. Especially if you drive sensibly. BTW, you really should run at least a 180 thermostat. The computer stays in closed loop until it hits 180. I run the stock 192 and have not had any issues.
@lilsammywasapunkrock I had that 5.0 a long, long time ago. Got 27mpg on the highway, about 18 around town. The 160 was to cool things for more power, but like I said, I got rid of that car like 15 years ago, maybe even more than that...
@Cripton805 lol...I own and drive a forced induction 4 cylender car......yet I would never brag about getting good gas mileage. What the f does that have to do with anything in the world of performance cars? You want to point out the long list of cars that run mid 13's stock in the same price range?
stop over rating the EVO and STI....again I drive a turbo 4 banger....but stop being a f'n riceboy. The mustang is a bad ass car
@MoparTurbo05 dude. a stock pre 2011 GT is a low 14sec or high 13sec car. What part of that dont you understand. A stock Type-R is a low 14 sec car with half of the Cylinders. 2011 Mustangs and future ones now have the right to be consdered a sport car. Anything before that was a Joke. New V6 300+hp and V8 400+... Old V6 low 200ish hp and V8 300hp ish... a stock Type S was at 200hp and its just a little sport coupe. now the weight difference puts them 1 sec away from each other OR less.
@Cripton805 Mustangs, Camaros, Challengers, none of the above were, or ever will be considered sports cars!! They are PONY cars, rear drive, long hood, short deck, 4 passanger American Icons from the past, still alive and well today, and a Fox 5.0 with minor tweaks can and will run high 12's all day long without lifting a single valve cover!!
@toreyw100 my buddys 4.6, 03 threw a spark plug and almost ruined the head and its low milage and a DD. Stock. My other buddys 5.0 spends more time at the shop getting fixed than on the street. Most people that I know with Stangs have bad experiences. Except my other buddies 65 lol
@Cripton805 I bought my 5.0 in '98 with 73,000 miles, put a clutch and a u-joint in it (typical maint.) and until the oil pump went out at 121,000 miles didnt have any major prob. and I drove it like a race car every time I drove it!! Check out my vids. The SRT-4 in my vid. was in the shop every 3 months, which is why I no longer own it!!
@Cripton805 The SOHC 4.6 is notorious for throwing spark plugs, but to no fault of the vehicle. There's a reason there's a torque spec, and why to use quality parts on your vehicle. As far as the 5.0, they make really good boat anchors.
@Cripton805 just because somebody was tech doesn't mean he didn't fuck it up. The procedure on those has to be exact if not problems occur. Every single one I worked on at Ford that had that issue had just received a tune up, where shitty parts and improper procedures caused problems.
@svtlincoln i guess if theyre parts are that high fuckn maintenace. Idk if they were oem or not but this dude builds motors soo i think he knows what hes doin
@toreyw100 BULLSHIT on the 5.0. Only thing you're gonna be able to do without liftin a valve cover is an intake swap, a CAI and the exhaust and you're gonna be a far cry from 12's. The stock cam has it's limits as do the heads. Only way you're runnin 12's without crackin a valve cover is to boost it or spray, and that doesn't count as a minor tweak.
@svtlincoln Sorry to burst your bubble, but in '98 5.0 Magazine did it!! Starting with a bone stock, bare bones Fox body coupe, no air, power windows/locks and radio delete, Ran mid 13's completely stock, Adding street slicks, removing air silencer, and front sway bar, bumped up the timing, 3.73 gears, headers, and free flowing exhaust... broke the 12.9 mark... No boost, no sparay!!! Power to wieght ratio, the right gears, traction, and someone who can drive a 5 speed is all it takes!!!
@svtlincoln I am not here to argue with you, as it seems you are!! Minor tweaks to me and others may differ!! To me if it can be done in your garage in a few hours without going into the engine, its a pretty minor tweak!! Either way, the point is, no cam, heads, intake, nitrous, boost!! Very little money, or time is needed on a stock motored 5.0 to attain 12's!!! The 5.0 was a marvel in 86-92, forged pistons, rods, molly rings, dbl roller chain, take a beatin and keep coming back for more!!!
@Cripton805 Its about WEIGHT.....a tin can will be faster with a small engine, this is not rocket science. Those older "shitty" V8 mustangs also had a ton more potential just based on the motor than any of those f'n Honda's you talk about. You're talking about a Type R, so lets talk about the 03 Cobra.....which walks anything Honda ever made stock, made short of f'n F1 cars and crotch rockets, including the NSX. But yeah every mustang pre 2011 sucks? F'n Honda fanboys....
@MoparTurbo05 How much did a brand new 03 Cobra cost. Major fucking fail. Slap yourself in the face. The NSX kept the same base since the early 90's and the Type R was based off of an engine cast from the late 80's. These car's are still not considered under powered even by today's standards more than 20 years later. And Ford at the time was getting only around 50hp more or less with their 5.0. That's right fucker and with a 300-600lbs heavier body and MUCH larger engine.
@Cripton805 There's no point arguing with those people, they cant accept fact, technology over rules, its no longer about 15L displacement. But who can drill that through their heads...
@MoparTurbo05 Broooo, why you talking, you can't compare any of your shit engines to Honda. RA121E, RA005E, RA806E, the list goes on, you can't win. Just accept defeat, there's no shame in being inferior.
that is not a fucking 2001 i've owned a 2000 si bought it brand new and it was the last year for that model. Si's didn't return until 2002 with the crapback
hahaha its better than a 01 homie get your shit staight the only civic that came out with dohc v-tech in 01 was the h.b. idiot..............dah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@castaneda805 actually, there was no hatchback in 2001, idiot, second off, its v-tec, there is no h at the end, this isnt the phone brand, so before you go around calling people idiots, you should make sure your information is correct........... dah!!!!
rolling starts are bullshit.go from a standing start lets see what really can happen,too many what ifs on rolling starts,not to mention they really arent fair for someone in the race.if that mustang was trully slower then great but this vid proves nothing to me.
Well, to settle this all, there are such things as 2001 Civic Si's. They're extremely rare though. They have the same body style as 01-05 Civic Ex coupes and were only available in Canada.
to the people who keep saying Si wasnt made in 2001, well it was....i have one. It's just not the same body....starting from 2001-2005, the body is completely redesigned from the 99-00 model
talk about a garbage video, first of all that is not a Mustang 5.0...not a mustang at all....so go fuck yourself with your fake ass shitty quality video and stop making up war stories....
Actually they are the right mirrors, they were known as sport mirrors only available on verts. As for being a 5.0??? I have an 89 5.0 5spd 3.08 gears all stock with 120,000+ miles, that Honda would have been seeing taillights!! Check out my vids...
Sabia que tendría respuesta de esto pero ya no puedo decir nads porke apenas digo algo y todos se awita tamadre sabes q el vtec esta perro el v8 también pero el video para que te digo vea ha ! Ha ha ! Un abraso ok
that's a 1999-2000 SI right
MaddDogg81 4 months ago
Where's the three honks and go? Looks like the Honda had a jump and still lost.
lovecheese45 4 months ago
This is the best quality video i've ever seen
shawnlux02 4 months ago
@shawnlux02 i know i felt like i was really there... i wonder if they have it in 3d as well?
wtfyourafuckindoosh 3 months ago
lol 5.0s still racing civics the government needs to destroy all 5.0s for being a pussy muscle car with 220hp stock lol
plane45036 5 months ago
I'm BLIND!
fasthonda 5 months ago
Hey go fuck yourself..I wasnt being a bitch so you shouldn't
nitromethanehemi 5 months ago
not a 5.0
camisamper 5 months ago
How does something like this get 1/2 a million views!!!!!
Specialized1993 5 months ago
that civic is either a 1999 or 2000 they changed the body style in 2001
nitromethanehemi 6 months ago
@nitromethanehemi no shit sherlock
Hugehead30 5 months ago
people just don't know anything about honda.. in less than 10 years the from a 16 seconds running into the 7s.. power of honda... not to mention they rule at everything else.. take honda superbike for example.. they make everything.. even ur power generator
TurboD16z6 6 months ago
sir you are wrong. that is not an 01 si. its an em1 (99-00) body style si. best body style they came in btw.
bodomreaper757 6 months ago
y was this filmed with a banana
zzM16 6 months ago
well you got a decision to make new brakes or a new camera
cdude100 6 months ago
My mom's '03 Durango would kill that rice burning little waste of metal....my mustang would just plain murder it....all those things are good for are taking up space and making hot girls look hotter. Gotta give my respect to the tuners though, I respect them but just not my cup of tea.
LimeStangGt 7 months ago
that cant in no way be a 2001 and si with a em1 look a like. haha there never was a 2001 si
userbame123 7 months ago
i think this is about 10p try upgrading to 1080p lmafo
perry244 8 months ago
thats not an 01 civic thats a 6th generation
dereksettle1 8 months ago
@dereksettle1 looks like EM1 to me
cultivationist 8 months ago
HD get
CoolishYeti 8 months ago
They have recording features on calculators???
acdcsrs 8 months ago
i think the black pixel won
6422m 9 months ago 2
damn was this filmed with your mother's penis lol
prosurfer2222 9 months ago
do not be assholes, the civic without turbo or the nitros are useless, they would easily win the Mustang.
TheGer88 10 months ago
its only 99 00si nevermade a 2001
GORDOMAX22 11 months ago 2
@GORDOMAX22 they made si hatches from 2001 to present'
Romantase 10 months ago
the mustang should and will own a 01 Si every run, thats if the driver knows what he/she is doing.
muscleheadist 11 months ago
Well the civic didnt win but it didn't digrace itself either.
dindanio1 11 months ago
thats not a 2001....
metaljunkie209 1 year ago 10
Shitty ole mustang struggles with a car that has an engine no larger than a 2L coke bottle.
jabba12000 1 year ago
@jabba12000 no larger than a 1.6l, actually, haha
Romantase 10 months ago
@Romantase
Ha yeah thats true. Mustangs are a joke.
jabba12000 10 months ago
@jabba12000 the owners are even more of a joke, haha
Romantase 10 months ago
@Romantase
oh god yeah!
jabba12000 10 months ago
@jabba12000 there is more to racing than just the size of the motor, weight is a big factor, but wtf do you bench racing youtube n00bs care right?
MoparTurbo05 7 months ago
@MoparTurbo05
No fucking shit weight is a factor.... so is traction,gearing,powerband,hp,tq,the faggit driving......My point was that this mustang has an engine many times bigger than the one in the civic and the civic still pulled... now i know weight matters but you'd imagine a 5.0L v8 could still beat a 1.6L inline four that weighs only 300-400lbs less. But apparently it can't. Thats because mustangs blow cock and loses to toy cars like this one all the time.
jabba12000 7 months ago
Comment removed
RIEKSONE 7 months ago
so it took honda 43 years to beat a 302 windsor
you are funny mate
RIEKSONE 7 months ago
@RIEKSONE
No.... This is obviously not one of their sports cars. It just so happens their ecobox civic can pull on it. Its not like honda tried to make the civic faster than the mustang. They are in completly different markets. Its just so funny that their ecobox by chance is as fast as a 5.0 mustang gt foxbody which was made to be a sports car and not an ecobox. But yet it can't handle 1.6L of economy lol
jabba12000 7 months ago
@jabba12000
modded sure
stock no and dont forget the driver variable
RIEKSONE 7 months ago
@RIEKSONE
The civic in this video was stock. 5.0 mustangs are slow as fuck man.
jabba12000 7 months ago
@jabba12000
i road race buddy
i hardly see civic on the track but i do see miatas i respect these little fuckers
but yeah
RIEKSONE 6 months ago
@RIEKSONE go to japan, civic ftw
TurboD16z6 6 months ago
@jabba12000
dude the foxbody was created in 1979 and has had the same engine 302 since then besides the turbo four
RIEKSONE 6 months ago
@RIEKSONE
Well its fords fault for putting the same dated engine in their shitstang year after year while the rest of the cars advanced out of the 70's. Then when they finally do change engines they decided to switch over to a 4.6L shitty SOHC with just 2 valves that was first introduced in the lincoln towncar.
jabba12000 6 months ago
@RIEKSONE Are you mentally de-arranged? Do you have even the slightest clue of what Honda has achieved? They made one of the best fucking F1 engines, the fuck has your redneck shit made? A new 35hp lawnmower that can tow your trailer home around? Fuck head, learn some shit before you decide to talk.
TupacX2Pak 6 months ago
wtf is talking about the em1 only came out in 99-00 chassis
luiskamps5482 1 year ago
they didnt make an 01 si..
alexhunter777 1 year ago 4
@alexhunter777 agreed
panthercreekallday 1 year ago
@alexhunter777 thats what i thought lol, like wtf why would he post something thats total bs
ruskiroma 1 year ago
@alexhunter777 well thats one thing, muscle heads dont know much about imports unless they were born in a garage always in one like i have been
hotwireme 1 year ago
my 1985 supra 5speed with doch would beat those mustangs any time
rp64lbc 1 year ago
Hondas are fucking gay man
MR90FOXBODY 1 year ago
what do mustangs and tampons have in common?
they're both for pussies
TheScrewable 1 year ago
@Metalhead852 ...The engine in a Scion tc can handle 20 psi with just a thicker head gasket.
moeschizlac 1 year ago
@moeschizlac I don't even remember what I said to really respond but ok! lol I'm confused.
Metalhead852 1 year ago
2000 HONDA CIVIC SI LOL 2001 RICER!
jdmeg805 1 year ago
That's a 2000 civic. They changed body styles in 2001
alexhc09 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check Out! JDM squidoo. com/jdmworld
freshboutique 1 year ago
Damn.. is that the new 1080p 3D??
pabloVEVO 1 year ago 76
@pabloVEVO chill son this was recorded with a calculator WAAAAAY more expensive than that 1080pHD bullshit lol
xspade777 10 months ago
plz dont post cell phone vids
ironlung213 1 year ago
Your brakes aren't bad its just the way Mustangs are built. I used to road race a 01 GT with stock brakes and suspension and it was dangerous to race. Completely unpredictable. Ford engineered suspensions are an afterthought on those cars.
psi2hi 1 year ago
@psi2hi why would you road race with stock brakes? I dont think Ford had road racing in mind For a stock anything. Where did you place in the race?
getyourballzup 1 year ago
@getyourballzup It was a class that required stock parts (except for a few bolt on engine modifications) And there was more than one race I entered. The best finish was 5th out of 21, worst was 17th out of 21. I ran the same class one weekend with a FWD Eclipse and won twice in a row. And also won with an AWD Talon. I owned non of the cars I raced. I race owners cars for them.
psi2hi 1 year ago
@psi2hi Yeah I just didnt see anyone putting a stock mustang in a road race. I bet that AWD Talon was a Beast in the curves. Mustang are just one of those cars like many, they have to be modded to get good quality performance.
getyourballzup 1 year ago
@psi2hi Well ford puts the live rear in them. They are built for drag racing not road racing. I'm surprised they still haven't moved on to the independent rear yet. Although the live rear is way easier to tune for drag racing and easier to get the weight on launch to where you want it.
Metalhead852 1 year ago
dayumm bro that`s what i call a DOHC VTEC PULL that SI pulls very strong NICE RACE JDM FOR LIFE KEEP IT ON BRO
luiskamps5482 1 year ago
DAYUMMM NICE JOB BRO LETS SHOW THOSE SHITTY MUSTANG PEOPLE WHO IS THE BEST JDM`ER FOR LIFE CHEAA
luiskamps5482 1 year ago
this 2001 piece of shit honda should race a 2001 mustang.
jimmybrown11111 1 year ago
@jimmybrown11111 its actualy a 99-00. the body style changes after that for 01-05, and this is definitely a 99-00, or 96-98 with a 99-00 front bumper and headlights, and tail lights. but i know what you're saying. have it race its own year and see who wins.
joescivic 1 year ago
haha stupid ricers, and import ricers.
blazzing4321 1 year ago
Cobdope175, can you please type in English? I could only understand a few words that you had written. You wrote, "unnecassarily" words. The rest of the words you had written were correctly spelled, but the way they were arranged was difficult to understand...something about you being really high and your car and that after your boyfriend pulled out you farted? I don't understand what point you were trying to make.
Georgenfla 1 year ago 2
Speed kills, drive safe,drive a ricer .
Lotum4n 1 year ago 2
@Lotum4n if your a gay asian with a tiny dick go ahead...
AVENGEDgunslinger 1 year ago
@Lotum4n thats bout all they r good 4 goin slow
JohnDeereBoy06 1 year ago 6
@Lotum4n If you could not tell by watching the video, the Mustang was just as slow.
Mustangsrghey 1 year ago
@Lotum4n
How can you drive a ricer? That doesn't make sense idiot
Jewishpropaganda 1 year ago
its either a 99 or 00 not 01
kdgg26 1 year ago
what recorder in the world takes this low grade of a video lmao & why did you buy it !?
bseries2ner 1 year ago
i did a little bit of research and the only difference between a regular civic and the SI is that the factory tells the computer in the car to allow it to go faster.
Mcnutterbutter100 1 year ago
@Mcnutterbutter100 your research is quite full of shit
steviezee47 1 year ago
And just one more american v8 junk gets blown away by a Japanese economy car!
Tophairybutt 1 year ago
@Tophairybutt you can beat what ever you want to beat... its up to you how you drive and how much money and work you put into it be realistic -_- i have beat many hondas around and they have beat me to
its Hand to hand as you call it part to part -_-
X2N18 1 year ago
@Tophairybutt the mustang slowed down the video was crap!!!!!!!
Imports are like TAMPONS every pussy needs one!!!!!!!!!
twistedtbird 1 year ago
@Tophairybutt Your unavoidably dumb. Take ANY stock Mustang, Camaro, or any other American muscle, against ANY stock Honda, Toyota, or whatever else, I guarantee you the American will come out on top. Even with all the pointless plastic spoilers that go unnecassarily high in the air or the exhausts you buy off ebay that don't do anything but make your car fart.
cobdude175 1 year ago 3
@cobdude175 Are you serious? Those companies make more than just a civic and a camry. Here is a list of cars they do just fine against American counterparts. EVO, WRX STI, Supra, NSX, RX7, S2000, Celica (AWD version), 3000GT VR4.... I could go on but I got shit to do.
Metalhead852 1 year ago
ur mustang must be very slow.....that race shouldnt have been that close
kcclifton017 1 year ago
who cares who wins. you are both assholes
pancakewafflebacon 1 year ago 3
Why does noone mention that this isn't an 01 si...
It's an 99-00 EM1 if anything...
w00t692 1 year ago
was this recorded on a fisher price camera?
MoparTurbo05 1 year ago
terrible pic quality
stylin60es 1 year ago
This is funny. That mustang probably wasted a weeks worth of the civics gas in ONE run haha. For the same result. What a shame
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805 yeah thats all hondas got.....better gas mileage...who the fuck buys a performance car for mpg?
MoparTurbo05 1 year ago
@MoparTurbo05 So yould you buy a performance car that wasn't fast? Thats a stupid A** reply lol
Point#1: The SI doesnt cost alot to run but yet can beat a GT at times even to its 4L+ depending on year & driver.
Point#2: If im spending that much on gas, it beter be a truck or something quicker than 13.5.
Point#3: Evo, STI, exaples of smaller engines that will still kick most GTs ass and still save gas.
Main point: Sad excuse for a car
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805 What do you think a stock mustang gets for gas mileage compared to a modified civic or even a stock STI? Seriously. I have gotten over 30mpg to a tank with my 5.0. After 20 years of designing cars especially for rally's, its about time they get a car faster then a stock mustang with 100,000 miles on it. Civics are not performance vehicles. They are grocery getters and daily drivers. Just like a mustang.
lilsammywasapunkrock 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock
bull shit, you design rally cars and still think these boats on wheels are good?
why havent i seen a mustang in a rally or in a circuit race?
oh thats right... cuz their only good for driving in straight lines and making wide left hand turns
you obviously dont know shit about cars
1pwNz0mb13Z 1 year ago
@1pwNz0mb13Z Funny. I would always think that a longer wheelbase with a limited by cv axle clearance front suspension just screams good handling car. Do you know what a rally even is? Ever been to a dirt track race? Its dominated by inline 4 mustangs and turbo chickens, not front wheel drive fart cannons. Gee I wonder why. I also seriously doubt that the car in this video is a mustang at all. Its easy to say your beat a mustang when there is not proof and a shitty cell phone video with 3fps.
lilsammywasapunkrock 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock
haha, i dont know what kind of pussy rallies ur talking about but REAL rallies are dominated by Japanese and European cars... including the type-R civic,
ive NEVER seen some crappy American muscle car in a rally or a circuit race at all,
stop wasting ur life with NASCAR and driving in straight lines and learn about the WTCC, BTCC, WRC, DTM, Super GT's
Once again you dont know SHIT about real cars and racing
1pwNz0mb13Z 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock Ever been to an actually rally race? they're dominated by AWD subaru's, not 4cyl mustangs.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@1pwNz0mb13Z LMAO, he told you he designs rally cars? this same fucktard told me a 200hp 1986 stang runs a 14.1 1/4 mile stock. I was right he does go around YouTube makin shit up.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock bullshit to 30mpg on the 5.0
You're a fucking retard for even thinking that. Slap yourself.
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805
Learn to drive a real car, and just about anything can get into the 25+mpg range. A fuel injected car with 2.73 gears and overdrive kicks the shit out of a little 4 banger. I drove about 200 miles a day, mostly freeway and got 600+ miles to a tank a couple of times. I averaged about 27-28mpg, more or less depending on how much I romped on it.
lilsammywasapunkrock 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock Its impossible even when the car is new.
21 city/26 hwy Stang with the smallest engine. How much do you think that 8 was burning? More than new trucks. We're not talking a 2011 GT 5.0. This is the early 90's.
You're a dumbass. Even other Mustang owners can argue with you. You're even lucky to get 20mpg Highway.
My own personal little 4 banger has the ability to hang or beat your "big bad" 5.0
I have an Integra GSR. Don't believe me? Do some research. Nuff said.
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805 Hey, when you learn to drive a car let me know. You can have twice the engine working half as hard, or you can have half the engine working twice as hard. My car idles at 600rpm. Yours is 1000 or more. right there your i-4 is using about or more gas then my v-8. At my 1200RPM cruising speed, compared to your, what 3000rpm? Which do you think uses more fuel? Fastest I've ever seen someone run in a stock GSR around here is a 16.3. Even a new driver pulls 15's in a stock mustang.
lilsammywasapunkrock 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock You're a complete idiot if you think you have better gas milage. And lose 100% credibility if you think they idle at 1000k. It's really obvious I know more about the car YOU drive. You don't even deserve to be on the road. I can go a whole day without hitting 3.5k
Even funnier that you say they work twice as hard and they usually last twice as long... Damn now that's funny shit
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805
When did I say it would last longer? I have owned several 302's with well over 200K though. Every i-4 I've driven has idled at 1000rpm or more. And it is working twice as hard. My car shifts before you hit v-tec. Makes a ton more power, at much lower RPM"S. I can go weeks without hitting 2k.Your right, I'm not an expert on your car. But when I call you out on how fast it is, out of no where now your sure that it will get much better mileage. It better, being almost 1/3rd the size.
lilsammywasapunkrock 1 year ago
@Cripton805 And by the way, I just looked up a GSR gear ration chart and mapped it. At 66mph you should be at 3250RPM assuming you have stock sized tires, in 5th gear and the 4.4 final drive ratio. So your right, you COULD go all day without hitting 70mph. I don't know about where you live, but I have speed limits at 75 here. And you were right about idle speed. I guess your idle should be the same as mine, at around 650RPM's.
lilsammywasapunkrock 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock Yeah. I live in a city and even if its running at 3250 I have a much higher redline, so that means nothing at all. 3250 on the Mustang would mean it would be forcing it alot more than my engine. Still point proven. You should've researched on your gas milage instead of spending all that time finding stuff that is irrelevant to the gas milage because that is what you're getting to
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805
I live in a city as well. Occasionally I actually drive my car somewhere else too though. I know what I get for gas mileage. You don't seem to though. I just said I had a 5.0. Your gear ratio has alot to do with gas mileage, as well as RPM's. Higher you rev, the more gas you use. I drive a 5.0 87 thunderbird. Basically the same engine, with worse heads, intake and camshaft that flows less. It was rated at 27 hwy in 87 with the same fuel management systems and transmission and rear.
lilsammywasapunkrock 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock Go to edmunds and look up one of the cons for a 90 Mustang 5.0 LX or GT. One the cons is "gas milage." I guess if you commute every single day and use a 5.0 to travel everyday then I guess it might be possible to get 27mpg which would be dog on rare and if your car was to stock spec and you drove 50mph on 5th w/ no passangers. Ill send you a link
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805
Cripton decided he was wrong and no longer wanted to debate this topic. He emailed me personally and decided not to continue.
lilsammywasapunkrock 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock No. The guys Mustang is out of commision. I guess my 15 year old car with more miles lasted more than his.
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805 my 88 LX with 3.73's got probably 22-23 mpg on the highway, I used to take it on long trips all the time. That was doing 65-75mph even with thsoe gears. Motor had bolt on's.
MoparTurbo05 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lilsammywasapunkrock Yeah. I live in a city and even if its running at 3250 I have a much higher redline, so that means nothing at all. 3250 on the Mustang would mean it would be forcing it alot more than my engine. Still point proven. You should've researched on your gas milage instead of spending all that time finding stuff that is irrelevant to the gas milage because that is what you're getting to
Cripton805 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock With my 1986 5.0 GT, back in the day, we went to Florida for spring break, with 3 in the car, loaded with gear, with 3.08 rear end and 160 thermostat, still got 27mpg @ 70mph the whole way down and back. $44 in gas each way. Cheap as heck back then...
marcomariaz26 1 year ago
@marcomariaz26 This guy lost 100% credibility. Don't listen to his lies. Somehow this guy has surpassed every other Mustang owner in MPG and even states that he got way better MPG than what even ford puts on the sticker on a new car at the time. Even ford tried to put a high MPG, but not as much as this idiot claims.
Cripton805 1 year ago
@marcomariaz26 Hey guy, remember, no mustang ever hit 20mpg. Especially if you drive sensibly. BTW, you really should run at least a 180 thermostat. The computer stays in closed loop until it hits 180. I run the stock 192 and have not had any issues.
lilsammywasapunkrock 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock I had that 5.0 a long, long time ago. Got 27mpg on the highway, about 18 around town. The 160 was to cool things for more power, but like I said, I got rid of that car like 15 years ago, maybe even more than that...
marcomariaz26 1 year ago
@lilsammywasapunkrock my 88 LX 5.0L with 3.73's got like 23mpg on the highway, i took her on long trips all the time when I had that car.
MoparTurbo05 7 months ago
@Cripton805 lol...I own and drive a forced induction 4 cylender car......yet I would never brag about getting good gas mileage. What the f does that have to do with anything in the world of performance cars? You want to point out the long list of cars that run mid 13's stock in the same price range?
stop over rating the EVO and STI....again I drive a turbo 4 banger....but stop being a f'n riceboy. The mustang is a bad ass car
MoparTurbo05 1 year ago
@MoparTurbo05 dude. a stock pre 2011 GT is a low 14sec or high 13sec car. What part of that dont you understand. A stock Type-R is a low 14 sec car with half of the Cylinders. 2011 Mustangs and future ones now have the right to be consdered a sport car. Anything before that was a Joke. New V6 300+hp and V8 400+... Old V6 low 200ish hp and V8 300hp ish... a stock Type S was at 200hp and its just a little sport coupe. now the weight difference puts them 1 sec away from each other OR less.
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805 Mustangs, Camaros, Challengers, none of the above were, or ever will be considered sports cars!! They are PONY cars, rear drive, long hood, short deck, 4 passanger American Icons from the past, still alive and well today, and a Fox 5.0 with minor tweaks can and will run high 12's all day long without lifting a single valve cover!!
toreyw100 1 year ago
@toreyw100 my buddys 4.6, 03 threw a spark plug and almost ruined the head and its low milage and a DD. Stock. My other buddys 5.0 spends more time at the shop getting fixed than on the street. Most people that I know with Stangs have bad experiences. Except my other buddies 65 lol
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805 I bought my 5.0 in '98 with 73,000 miles, put a clutch and a u-joint in it (typical maint.) and until the oil pump went out at 121,000 miles didnt have any major prob. and I drove it like a race car every time I drove it!! Check out my vids. The SRT-4 in my vid. was in the shop every 3 months, which is why I no longer own it!!
toreyw100 1 year ago
@Cripton805 The SOHC 4.6 is notorious for throwing spark plugs, but to no fault of the vehicle. There's a reason there's a torque spec, and why to use quality parts on your vehicle. As far as the 5.0, they make really good boat anchors.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@svtlincoln I know all about torque spec. It was owned by a tech so I think he knew what he was doing.
Cripton805 1 year ago
@Cripton805 just because somebody was tech doesn't mean he didn't fuck it up. The procedure on those has to be exact if not problems occur. Every single one I worked on at Ford that had that issue had just received a tune up, where shitty parts and improper procedures caused problems.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@svtlincoln i guess if theyre parts are that high fuckn maintenace. Idk if they were oem or not but this dude builds motors soo i think he knows what hes doin
Cripton805 1 year ago
@toreyw100 BULLSHIT on the 5.0. Only thing you're gonna be able to do without liftin a valve cover is an intake swap, a CAI and the exhaust and you're gonna be a far cry from 12's. The stock cam has it's limits as do the heads. Only way you're runnin 12's without crackin a valve cover is to boost it or spray, and that doesn't count as a minor tweak.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@svtlincoln Sorry to burst your bubble, but in '98 5.0 Magazine did it!! Starting with a bone stock, bare bones Fox body coupe, no air, power windows/locks and radio delete, Ran mid 13's completely stock, Adding street slicks, removing air silencer, and front sway bar, bumped up the timing, 3.73 gears, headers, and free flowing exhaust... broke the 12.9 mark... No boost, no sparay!!! Power to wieght ratio, the right gears, traction, and someone who can drive a 5 speed is all it takes!!!
toreyw100 1 year ago
@toreyw100 Replacing the rear gear is not a MINOR TWEAK. You're replacing drive components and that's not a tweak.
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@svtlincoln I am not here to argue with you, as it seems you are!! Minor tweaks to me and others may differ!! To me if it can be done in your garage in a few hours without going into the engine, its a pretty minor tweak!! Either way, the point is, no cam, heads, intake, nitrous, boost!! Very little money, or time is needed on a stock motored 5.0 to attain 12's!!! The 5.0 was a marvel in 86-92, forged pistons, rods, molly rings, dbl roller chain, take a beatin and keep coming back for more!!!
toreyw100 1 year ago
@Cripton805 Its about WEIGHT.....a tin can will be faster with a small engine, this is not rocket science. Those older "shitty" V8 mustangs also had a ton more potential just based on the motor than any of those f'n Honda's you talk about. You're talking about a Type R, so lets talk about the 03 Cobra.....which walks anything Honda ever made stock, made short of f'n F1 cars and crotch rockets, including the NSX. But yeah every mustang pre 2011 sucks? F'n Honda fanboys....
MoparTurbo05 7 months ago
@MoparTurbo05 How much did a brand new 03 Cobra cost. Major fucking fail. Slap yourself in the face. The NSX kept the same base since the early 90's and the Type R was based off of an engine cast from the late 80's. These car's are still not considered under powered even by today's standards more than 20 years later. And Ford at the time was getting only around 50hp more or less with their 5.0. That's right fucker and with a 300-600lbs heavier body and MUCH larger engine.
Cripton805 7 months ago
@Cripton805 There's no point arguing with those people, they cant accept fact, technology over rules, its no longer about 15L displacement. But who can drill that through their heads...
TupacX2Pak 6 months ago
@MoparTurbo05 Broooo, why you talking, you can't compare any of your shit engines to Honda. RA121E, RA005E, RA806E, the list goes on, you can't win. Just accept defeat, there's no shame in being inferior.
TupacX2Pak 6 months ago
@MoparTurbo05 - Metrosexuals like Cripton805 do... He's probably tweezing his brows while surfing you tube jerking off to The Fast and Furious.
JayGeePee1 1 year ago
@Cripton805 ...That looks like a 99 si
moeschizlac 1 year ago
that is not a fucking 2001 i've owned a 2000 si bought it brand new and it was the last year for that model. Si's didn't return until 2002 with the crapback
blaziankhmer 1 year ago
that civic is a 2000 si, the 2001s have triangle taillights and dont come in the si edition in the coupe body style
loadedlover12 1 year ago
hahaha its better than a 01 homie get your shit staight the only civic that came out with dohc v-tech in 01 was the h.b. idiot..............dah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
castaneda805 1 year ago
@castaneda805 actually, there was no hatchback in 2001, idiot, second off, its v-tec, there is no h at the end, this isnt the phone brand, so before you go around calling people idiots, you should make sure your information is correct........... dah!!!!
MrNjracer 1 year ago
That's not 2001 civic
diddy150 1 year ago
That's not a 01 stupid that's a 99 or a 00 smart one
Raiders209cali 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
★☆☆☆☆.
rcdude747 1 year ago
muscle FTW!
GTO19020 1 year ago
BEST QUALITY EVER.
ytSouljah 1 year ago
nice win but fuck you should have drawn a flip book with pictures, the framrate would have been better.
mogul1265 1 year ago 33
@mogul1265 LOL
stixzor 1 year ago
@mogul1265 lmao
browna09 1 year ago
@mogul1265 hahahaha you said butt fuck lmao
tibbracing1 1 year ago
CHECK THIS VIDEO "Civic si vs 5.0 mustang part 2"
aznpiccolo 1 year ago
rolling starts are bullshit.go from a standing start lets see what really can happen,too many what ifs on rolling starts,not to mention they really arent fair for someone in the race.if that mustang was trully slower then great but this vid proves nothing to me.
mattman67560 1 year ago
basketball23mvp.....there is 2001 si's....available in canada only...jesus....how many times does it need to be said?
stralman36 2 years ago
u retards... that is a 99 or 00 civic si.. theres no 01 02 si si's came back out in 03 and they were hatches
basketball23mvp 2 years ago
@basketball23mvp wrong. hatches came out in '02.
DuDaze1981 1 year ago
thats not a damn 2001!!!!!!!!!! it's a 99-00
platinumEK 2 years ago
This video is worth ★☆☆☆☆.
thechamp673 2 years ago 33
Well, to settle this all, there are such things as 2001 Civic Si's. They're extremely rare though. They have the same body style as 01-05 Civic Ex coupes and were only available in Canada.
jddsmg1130 2 years ago 3
@jddsmg1130 I know more then 10 ppl who have one... (Canada)... I own them all with my 1998 accord 2.3l Vtec. (F23A1)
YoanEmond 1 year ago
to the people who keep saying Si wasnt made in 2001, well it was....i have one. It's just not the same body....starting from 2001-2005, the body is completely redesigned from the 99-00 model
stralman36 2 years ago
talk about a garbage video, first of all that is not a Mustang 5.0...not a mustang at all....so go fuck yourself with your fake ass shitty quality video and stop making up war stories....
Bullittman1 2 years ago
yes that was def. not a mustang. . wrong mirrors, nice try though
gearhead302 2 years ago
Actually they are the right mirrors, they were known as sport mirrors only available on verts. As for being a 5.0??? I have an 89 5.0 5spd 3.08 gears all stock with 120,000+ miles, that Honda would have been seeing taillights!! Check out my vids...
toreyw100 2 years ago
dont make shit up. the 01 si was a k20 hatch. that shit was a 99 ex. good try.
aracus13 2 years ago
there isnt no 2001 si.. faggot.. u sure it wasnt a 95 hatchback? lol
hmglor 2 years ago
Sabia que tendría respuesta de esto pero ya no puedo decir nads porke apenas digo algo y todos se awita tamadre sabes q el vtec esta perro el v8 también pero el video para que te digo vea ha ! Ha ha ! Un abraso ok
Tetillas1221 2 years ago