I had heard a few friends mention the house of leaves and say that it was amazing, made them feel anxious or have claustrophobia... Ok, this book is different and engaging, but it really needs to be broken down for what it is; multiple stories running together and staggered in presentation. Although the word placement is different, it doesn't add anything to the story, especially the endless lists of places. So, the book is good on it's own, but it isn't the mind F*** i was hoping for.
comment not directed at anyone in particular. i loved house of leaves while reading it and afterwards i felt weird and idk different. i initially became interested because i am a poe fan but when i found out the basic theme i had to read it. i too an a writer and i had had a very similiar idea about the size difference anyway of a room in a house but mine wouldnt have touched this his creative process is amazing to me but maybe im glad i dont have that in my head. talented man,
@juliew625 i noticed when i read the book alot of parts, especially the stuff johnny wrote, would make me feel really anxious and once i started reading it i couldnt stop
@sleepcity Wow!... I think your comments and "opinions" speak for themselves...id love to have an adult conversation/debate with you because I think it would be interesting aside from the petty remarks Iv seen you make...but then again..."that's just my opinion." It'd be interesting but pointless
@sleepcity "at least by pretentious teenagers and undergrads"...yeah I'd say your pretty pretentious yourself. I also find it amusing that even though everyone disagrees with you, you are still unable to see past your hypocritical views...we're all wrong and your right...end of story.
@JustnKyle Oh dear lord. Like drama much? I think Danielewski is a very pretentious, untalented writer. I'm entitled to my opinion because it's just that: an opinion. I don't give a flying fuck what you or anyone else think. I made my comment and have only bothered to respond to your shrieking hysterical comments because they are so over the top. Everyone disagrees with me? Right...if "everyone" is a handful of Danielewski devotees who haven't been fortunate enough to discover good literature.
@JustnKyle Right...explaining the difference between "amount" and "number" is pretentious. Glance and sound? Would be wonderful if I knew what the hell you were talking about.
@sleepcity Oh no! If, in casual conversation, you use a word incorrectly, it destroys any credibility you have! Also, there is a verb and a noun usage of "amount," and his noun usage here is 100% grammatically correct. "quantity; measure: ex: a great amount of resistance."
@beatnickblanket Oh no! The usage is incorrect, chief. Amount is used for quantities THAT CAN BE MEASURED. Number is used for quantities WHICH ARE NUMBERED. Your example was "a great amount of resistance," which is something that would not be numbered but measured. Pray tell what unit would be used to measure "changes."
I didn't say he wasn't "credible." I said he doesn't understand the proper usage of amount vs. number (and you don't either, apparently). Do you know what credible means?
@sleepcity While I get what you mean (I did in your first comment) I don't agree that he may not understand proper usage. He is in the middle of an interview. It's not as if he has a script to read from, or that he's not human. I know that even the biggest Grammar Nazi's out there will slip up when speaking aloud, especially for an interview that will be televised. Slip-up doesn't not equal ignorant.
@aidentheodd Oh damn...I was really trying to impress you, stranger on the internet. I'm going to go read some House of Leaves and Chuck Palahniuk and see if anybody notices me.
@sleepcity It's pretty clear that either you were trying to big yourself up or just make us all feel less superior to you. Otherwise why would you come here, imply that we're all pretentious teenagers, and then correct Mara hardly noticable, quite unimportant grammar mistake? How can you honestly tell us we're pretentious when you spend your time watching YouTube videos only to comment on how many insignificant mistakes in said video you managed to find. Don't be a hypocrite.
@aidentheodd "It's pretty clear that either you were trying to big yourself up or just make us all feel less superior to you." What the hell does "big yourself up" mean? Also the opposite of superior is the word "inferior" not "less superior." I didn't say ALL of you are pretentious teenagers -- I'm sure many of you are just adults with bad taste. Plenty of them around. Again...just my opinion, which, by definition, I'm entitled to. Thanks for your comment.
@sleepcity Big yourself up means to make yourself feel bigger. Even if you'd never heard that phrase before I would've thought it would be quite easy to understand. Also, I am well aware of what inferior means. Less superior works just as well. Anyway, in response to you're comment: do you realise how pretentious and arrogant you yourself sound? Have you actually read "The House of Leaves"? Why do we have bad taste if we enjoyed it? Because anyone who doesn't share you're opinion has bad taste?
At points in the interview where he was describing his life, I felt as though he was describing Johnny Truant's or even Navidson's life. You can definitely tell that House of Leaves was a deeply personal work.
Why the hell would ANYONE care about the colour of the hair of a writer? Seriously? As if the book weren't infinitely stranger and more interesting than, basically, what he's wearing.
@felixvelariusbos it's a visual clue as to the meaning of his book. just like the visual clues contained within the structure of the book.
danielewski's mind is the "house of leaves." it is falling apart, fragmented, splintered. this book was his ten-year attempt at reconstructing his mind.
Question for the poster of the video: I'm having trouble finding the origins of this interview and the information I would need to cite this as a source for a speech that I'm doing on MZD for a college course. Would you happen to know any of that?
As for the interview itself, when he spoke about writing being innate and a way to reach into yourself as well as using it to reach out into the world around us, I absolutely loved that. Being a writer myself, I completely agreed. The man is a genius.
Anyone who ventures forth to read this, you must realize that everything has a literal and figurative meaning.. MZD's hair is blue to make a statement.. just as the word "house" appears in the text of the novel. while the majority of people will look at him and say "look at the douche with blue hair". But look beyond the appearance.. Just as his book is known for being unconventional and nonlinear. MZD is trying to get people to think out of the box if they ever want to understand anything
Uh...are you joking? You know, sometimes things just are what they are. Pastoral, if you will. Perhaps his hair is blue because he thinks it looks good, it makes him feel attractive. Why does it have to be more? Sometimes a house...is just a house.
if a "perhaps" or a "maybe" was added to the start of any of those statements i could find that plausible but dont come across like you know the guy personally and had in depth conversations about the color of his hair and why he chose it. Dye his hair blue to remind you of the word House, defiantly just look at the conversations it brought up. To make a statement? perhaps. but like Beatnick said, sometimes things are what they are. dont read too deep into things.
blue hair and shitty goatee make me not want to read this
eliasmurray 1 month ago
@eliasmurray Totally worthwhile read, dude. Guy may look strange here, but he's a hell of a writer.
mcchargueable 1 month ago
@eliasmurray Your loss.
MrCaptain221 1 month ago
Can someone please give me more information about this clip? What year was the interview? Who was the interviewer? Context, please? Thank you
chumpion 2 months ago
I KNOW HIS COUSin!!!! MG OMG OMG IM SO COOOOL
McDonggle 3 months ago
I had heard a few friends mention the house of leaves and say that it was amazing, made them feel anxious or have claustrophobia... Ok, this book is different and engaging, but it really needs to be broken down for what it is; multiple stories running together and staggered in presentation. Although the word placement is different, it doesn't add anything to the story, especially the endless lists of places. So, the book is good on it's own, but it isn't the mind F*** i was hoping for.
rotundus2 7 months ago
comment not directed at anyone in particular. i loved house of leaves while reading it and afterwards i felt weird and idk different. i initially became interested because i am a poe fan but when i found out the basic theme i had to read it. i too an a writer and i had had a very similiar idea about the size difference anyway of a room in a house but mine wouldnt have touched this his creative process is amazing to me but maybe im glad i dont have that in my head. talented man,
juliew625 8 months ago
@juliew625 i noticed when i read the book alot of parts, especially the stuff johnny wrote, would make me feel really anxious and once i started reading it i couldnt stop
Fexes420 7 months ago
this song is for you
starfishprimechannel 8 months ago
@sleepcity Wow!... I think your comments and "opinions" speak for themselves...id love to have an adult conversation/debate with you because I think it would be interesting aside from the petty remarks Iv seen you make...but then again..."that's just my opinion." It'd be interesting but pointless
JustnKyle 8 months ago
@sleepcity "at least by pretentious teenagers and undergrads"...yeah I'd say your pretty pretentious yourself. I also find it amusing that even though everyone disagrees with you, you are still unable to see past your hypocritical views...we're all wrong and your right...end of story.
JustnKyle 8 months ago
@JustnKyle Oh dear lord. Like drama much? I think Danielewski is a very pretentious, untalented writer. I'm entitled to my opinion because it's just that: an opinion. I don't give a flying fuck what you or anyone else think. I made my comment and have only bothered to respond to your shrieking hysterical comments because they are so over the top. Everyone disagrees with me? Right...if "everyone" is a handful of Danielewski devotees who haven't been fortunate enough to discover good literature.
sleepcity 8 months ago
Also, thanks for explaining your bizarre "glance and sound? Weird..." comment. Very helpful.
sleepcity 8 months ago
Why would he answer these intensely personal questions from this woman he doesn't know? Her faux concern makes me want to throw up. On her.
I would laugh and totally respect him if he were making it all up.
schnamtaro 9 months ago
@sleepcity At first glance you sound a little pretentious yourself...glance and sound? Weird...
JustnKyle 9 months ago
@JustnKyle Right...explaining the difference between "amount" and "number" is pretentious. Glance and sound? Would be wonderful if I knew what the hell you were talking about.
sleepcity 9 months ago
@sleep
JustnKyle 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The most vulgar words in the English language are "Mark Z------ Danielewski."
---Dr. Joseph Suglia, The Greatest Author in the World
jsuglia 11 months ago
I absolutely love you Mark. You are speaking with the high voice. I too am a novelist and I hope to meet you someday! :D
chinothepony 11 months ago
"She's gone through an enormous amount of changes."
Hard to believe a writer this critically lauded (at least by pretentious teenagers and undergrads) doesn't understand the usage of amount vs. number.
sleepcity 11 months ago
@sleepcity Oh no! If, in casual conversation, you use a word incorrectly, it destroys any credibility you have! Also, there is a verb and a noun usage of "amount," and his noun usage here is 100% grammatically correct. "quantity; measure: ex: a great amount of resistance."
beatnickblanket 11 months ago
@beatnickblanket Oh no! The usage is incorrect, chief. Amount is used for quantities THAT CAN BE MEASURED. Number is used for quantities WHICH ARE NUMBERED. Your example was "a great amount of resistance," which is something that would not be numbered but measured. Pray tell what unit would be used to measure "changes."
I didn't say he wasn't "credible." I said he doesn't understand the proper usage of amount vs. number (and you don't either, apparently). Do you know what credible means?
sleepcity 11 months ago
@sleepcity While I get what you mean (I did in your first comment) I don't agree that he may not understand proper usage. He is in the middle of an interview. It's not as if he has a script to read from, or that he's not human. I know that even the biggest Grammar Nazi's out there will slip up when speaking aloud, especially for an interview that will be televised. Slip-up doesn't not equal ignorant.
MizzAnthropy 9 months ago
@sleepcity go and be all high and mighty somewhere else. You're impressing no-one.
aidentheodd 10 months ago
@aidentheodd Oh damn...I was really trying to impress you, stranger on the internet. I'm going to go read some House of Leaves and Chuck Palahniuk and see if anybody notices me.
sleepcity 9 months ago
@sleepcity It's pretty clear that either you were trying to big yourself up or just make us all feel less superior to you. Otherwise why would you come here, imply that we're all pretentious teenagers, and then correct Mara hardly noticable, quite unimportant grammar mistake? How can you honestly tell us we're pretentious when you spend your time watching YouTube videos only to comment on how many insignificant mistakes in said video you managed to find. Don't be a hypocrite.
aidentheodd 8 months ago
@aidentheodd "It's pretty clear that either you were trying to big yourself up or just make us all feel less superior to you." What the hell does "big yourself up" mean? Also the opposite of superior is the word "inferior" not "less superior." I didn't say ALL of you are pretentious teenagers -- I'm sure many of you are just adults with bad taste. Plenty of them around. Again...just my opinion, which, by definition, I'm entitled to. Thanks for your comment.
sleepcity 8 months ago
@sleepcity Big yourself up means to make yourself feel bigger. Even if you'd never heard that phrase before I would've thought it would be quite easy to understand. Also, I am well aware of what inferior means. Less superior works just as well. Anyway, in response to you're comment: do you realise how pretentious and arrogant you yourself sound? Have you actually read "The House of Leaves"? Why do we have bad taste if we enjoyed it? Because anyone who doesn't share you're opinion has bad taste?
aidentheodd 8 months ago
Ew his hair.
NealWorman 1 year ago
Comment removed
10centwings 1 year ago
...Which is not to say that his hair is God's hair or even the hair of God. What I mean to say is that his hair IS God.
x2muchhorrorbizx 1 year ago 4
@x2muchhorrorbizx haha well said, I've reread that letter to karen many times
awiseguy86 1 year ago
WHAT DID YOU DO TO TOM!?!?!?
Fendertastic 1 year ago
OMG THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS!! HoL must take after Danielewski himself. I bet he's a [kitty] magnet! Lol!
B4seline18 1 year ago
At points in the interview where he was describing his life, I felt as though he was describing Johnny Truant's or even Navidson's life. You can definitely tell that House of Leaves was a deeply personal work.
DannyandtheBigBlue 1 year ago
I like his hair :)
Chinchillas96 1 year ago
Amazing man.
imsohappy 1 year ago
this guy is a freaking genius!!!!!!
kyleromano87 1 year ago
Why the hell would ANYONE care about the colour of the hair of a writer? Seriously? As if the book weren't infinitely stranger and more interesting than, basically, what he's wearing.
Mustahukkak 1 year ago
@Mustahukkak It's amusing because the word house was always colored blue. =)
felixvelariusbos 1 year ago
@felixvelariusbos it's a visual clue as to the meaning of his book. just like the visual clues contained within the structure of the book.
danielewski's mind is the "house of leaves." it is falling apart, fragmented, splintered. this book was his ten-year attempt at reconstructing his mind.
i'd say he was aptly successful.
kausertellslies 1 year ago
Question for the poster of the video: I'm having trouble finding the origins of this interview and the information I would need to cite this as a source for a speech that I'm doing on MZD for a college course. Would you happen to know any of that?
As for the interview itself, when he spoke about writing being innate and a way to reach into yourself as well as using it to reach out into the world around us, I absolutely loved that. Being a writer myself, I completely agreed. The man is a genius.
RandomMonotony 2 years ago 2
BEAUTIFUL EYES. BRILLIANT MAN.
theblackparade1039 2 years ago 11
well don't make fun of his hair unless you've read the book. it's quite simple.
kukuluku1 2 years ago 2
No, I think you can still make fun of his hair.
porgy29 1 year ago
Maybe his hair...
IS THE HOUSE
Boogyster 2 years ago 95
@Boogyster you're very close. it's his mind. his mind is "the house." and it's very fragile, thus the "leaves."
kausertellslies 1 year ago
@Boogyster lmfao
Fexes420 7 months ago
@Boogyster omg thats amazing. I'm still laughing.
SaraGroban 5 months ago
@Boogyster house of leaves ... leaves is a synonym for pages,,, the book is the house O.O!
PsycReaper 4 weeks ago
Anyone who ventures forth to read this, you must realize that everything has a literal and figurative meaning.. MZD's hair is blue to make a statement.. just as the word "house" appears in the text of the novel. while the majority of people will look at him and say "look at the douche with blue hair". But look beyond the appearance.. Just as his book is known for being unconventional and nonlinear. MZD is trying to get people to think out of the box if they ever want to understand anything
idioticgerbil 2 years ago 5
Uh...are you joking? You know, sometimes things just are what they are. Pastoral, if you will. Perhaps his hair is blue because he thinks it looks good, it makes him feel attractive. Why does it have to be more? Sometimes a house...is just a house.
beatnickblanket 2 years ago
if a "perhaps" or a "maybe" was added to the start of any of those statements i could find that plausible but dont come across like you know the guy personally and had in depth conversations about the color of his hair and why he chose it. Dye his hair blue to remind you of the word House, defiantly just look at the conversations it brought up. To make a statement? perhaps. but like Beatnick said, sometimes things are what they are. dont read too deep into things.
AnimeJunkie351 2 years ago
Genius. Blue hair or no.
Dyingtology 2 years ago 3
Book was great but goddamn he looks like a douche with that hair...
andrewtheman19 2 years ago 3
If by "douche" you mean "incredibly sexy and oh my GOD I wish he would just do porn because I want to hit it," then I agree..
beatnickblanket 2 years ago 2
Sure--when his hair isn't fucking blue haha
andrewtheman19 2 years ago 2
Remember it was like, what, 8 years ago? Blue hair was the hawt. ;)
beatnickblanket 2 years ago
haha...whatever floats your boat man. I think he looks goofy XD
andrewtheman19 2 years ago 2
I love this book.
myboomstick 2 years ago
that book enlightened me but seriously i thought that blond chick was about to start sucking his dick at one part hahahahahahahahaha
maskedpillager 2 years ago
this book changed my life too
morozsgovanyi 2 years ago
Best book ever. I really hope it becomes a classic.
Bakachi 2 years ago
That was a scary fucking book
hopkins4545 2 years ago
This book is fucking incredible!!!
JimboWoodo 2 years ago
This man is absolutely inspiring
gertrudebetrude 2 years ago
read it three times. just started my fourth.
this guy is a total genius.
he's changed the face of history with this book.
AsYouTurnToStone 2 years ago
ist book iv read in years.just finished it..will have 2 read it again..can relate 2 some of it..
robzilla73 2 years ago
Genius.
sebytheman 2 years ago
This book changed my life
juppukun 3 years ago
just got the book yesterday, it really gets into one's head! :)
jimbooo19 3 years ago