Added: 2 years ago
From: MaxxMitchell
Views: 45,504
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • their went 10 $in gas and half your tire tread way to go dumbass

  • How many # injectors were you using with 6psi? Thanks man

  • Dayum!

  • DAMN! what kind of numbers are you pullin with that setup?

  • @nalls426 At that point, probably only 440-460rwhp. It ended up making 560 with some more boost and E85. Currently the car has a 6.0 with a GT88, on 18lbs and E85 it made 807rwhp.

    With a 6.0 and a 76mm the car ran 9.97@139 with only 625rwhp.

  • @MaxxMitchell thats not bad at all for a stock 5.3! i wanna just do that to mine i have that im building right now instead of cam intake and heads! haha is it a front mount turbo?

  • what type of fuel control are you using if any? im doing a 5.3 twin turbo setup on my 90 camaro

  • very nice!! any idea how much hp/torque your making?

  • OMG !!!! sickkkkkkkkkk

  • how much is the turbo kit?

  • @82Calais the guy made it himself...

  • the birds are chirping since theyre now high of tire smoke and exhaust fumes

  • Daaaaammmmmmnnnnn!!!

  • id like to see a honda do a burnout that long

  • @kameroner96 it could happen if it was powered by that motor in the video lol

  • @kameroner96 I could but it would be in the ditch in 5 seconds

  • @kameroner96 - at least 500 feet long @ burn out. amazing.

  • i wanna do a 5.3 or 6.0 turbo setup in my monte carlo ss

  • @savagexhaley14 Dont do the 5.3 do the 6.0

  • @wildkyler95 the problem with that is, is that the 6.0 cant handle as much boost on the stock bottom end as the 5.3 and a 6.0 short block costs 3x as much. ill stick with the 5.3 considering i know of a car that runs 9.40's in the 1/4 with a 5.3 with a $400 turbo on it. thats fast enough for a street car

  • @savagexhaley14 Very good points, But if you knew all this why did you say you didnt know what to do xD

  • @wildkyler95 because at the time i said that i didnt know the 6.0 couldnt take as much boost and i could pick up a 6.0 at the time for $750 running instead of the 15-1600$ they cost now

  • @savagexhaley14 What is the reasoning for the 6.0 not being able to handle as much boost as the 5.3, just a longer stroke than the 5.3?

  • @Bjorn37 bigger bore

  • @Bjorn37 the 5.3 doesnt have a longer stroke than the 6.0. its the same crank.

  • you need to narrow the rear end get some good meats back there but nice smoke

  • FUCKIN  EH

  • That is so impressive!!!! that's like an 1/8 mile burnout, was it hard getting the 4L80 to fit?

  • I'm really curious about this too!

  • Hmmmm, it doesn't seem to have linked to the comment I wanted it to, which was the question about how difficult it was to fit the 4L80e in there?

  • I'm working on my 5.3 build right now; LM7, 317 Heads, Twin TC66's .58 A/R, T56, shooting for 18-20 psi, I'm LS1Tech and TheTurboForums under IT_SS.

    To the OP, NICE FRIGGIN RIDE!!!!!! Did you keep the stock heads or did you swap for 317's?

  • hell yeah, nice job

  • Nice tire-roasting session. I need a turbo/IC'd 5.3!

  • Well done =p

  • two words: SWEET JESUS!!!

  • Lol, very nice. I love the birds chirping in the end, what a nice day, lol.

  • hell ya my friend has a car like that and i keep tellin him to add a 5.3 or 4.8 truk motor in it.....bad ass!!!!

  • Finish him....Mwahahhahaha, flawless victory.....

  • it finaly lives good job man

  • Nice! Car Porn!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more