Neil Armstrong crash 8 mei 1968

[NASAvsPETE1]

Looks like it was bouncing off wires..

[Chuck6360]

I can't believe the future of moon hoax theory are lead by the peoples who are not even in the intellectual capability of 12 years old kids.

[Chuck6360]

If the astronauts on Mir received higher dose of radiation than the cosmonauts of Apollo how can you explain that they returned to Earth Safely. There is even a presentation showing the amount of space radiation received by the astronauts of each space flight.

[Chuck6360]

Dumbass, she didn;t precise what particles would cause such effect like fragmentation

[un4g1v3n1]

Chuck proves why trolls are to be ignored, rather than entertained with responses. You see, no matter what proof is given to a troll like chuckie, he will keep his head firmly up his ass, while pounding out moronic blatherings with his cramped little fingers. Educating himself is beyond him, as he clings to his Apollo Fairy Tale with all the strength in his little hands. Go to sleep chuckie, and dream you Apollo Fairy Tale dreams. You are truly pathetic!

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 Dumbass, she didn;t precise which particles would cause such effect like fragmentation

[Chuck6360]

I even wonder if you watched the video from the start to the end correctly.

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 At 54:00, she answered simply for the better understanding without mentioning the complex effect of radioactivity on Metal. You are just a disgrace man. There are 5 types of radiation in space and she did not fully explain the effect.

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 And you know what the amount of radiation received by the astronauts on the shuttle are same or even higher than apollo. Well you gonna say that we never went to the space with the shuttle?

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 You watched only the part beginning from 54:00 not the whole thing. She was saying that the aluminium was not a good shielding for the deep space manned exploration.

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 You watched only the part beginning from 54:00 not the whole thing. She was saying that the aluminium was not a good shielding for the deep space manned exploration. Furthermore dumbass there were the another space flight in earth orbit where the radiation doses were higher than the apollo like Mir where the astronauts stayed longer in space. And, they returned to Earth safely

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 Me pathetic? Wow, i didnt think that you were not even in the intellectual capability to do the resume out of the whole presentation. You are truly a Baldrick!!!

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 Just confess that the only part you were able to understand began from 54:00.

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 Hey , there is no proof coming from you. They are superficial.

[Chuck6360]

You better stop

[Chuck6360]

You interpreted what she said as you like.

[Chuck6360]

Sorry but you still fail to proof the hoax theory

[un4g1v3n1]

watch?v=6aWUa5l_WNs For those interested in hearing the truth about the danger of trying to use aluminum for space ships, listen to Eleanor Blakely. Time stamp on the video will fast-forward you to the truth. Or you can listen to moronic trolls like chuck here. What's your radiation experts name chuck? Is it Phil Plait, Jay Windley, or Adam Savage. LOL. I laugh at morons like yourself, as do real ASTRO/SOLAR PHYSICISTS when the see morons like yourself buying the Apollo Fairy Tale!

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 say something man i refute your claim.

[un4g1v3n1]

Apollo Fairy Tale Believers Unite. Show your ignorance of space. Prove you have no clue about simple subjects such as math and physics. Prove to your respective governments that the dumbing down effect they've put in place has worked on you completely. Congratulations, you don't deserve the space in your head, granted for a brain. You may as well remove it, and replace it with a book on religion or politics. Now, go forth in the world and produce more morons that look and sound like you!

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 Are you talking about yourself? Yeah sure the time stamp on the video will guide us to the truth by clicking it on directly to 54:00. You watched the video as if you were watching the youporn video.

[Chuck6360]

You got no proof to show that the moon landing was a hoax. Not a single god damn clue.

[Chuck6360]

And the fact that the aluminium can block the particles are even marked on the book of physics for high school student.

[Chuck6360]

v=6aWUa5l_WNs give me a break... piss off what a brit son of a bitch! You get the ---- out of here!

[Chuck6360]

Actually, you failed to answer me about the aluminium and the pseudo answer you provided failed miserably. v=6aWUa5l_WNs. I won the battle not you.

[Chuck6360]

In 500 years from now, the descendants will laugh at the moon hoax theorists reading the history book about it. And the Name "Bill Kissing the kiss ass" will remain nowhere.

[Chuck6360]

I deplore the state of ignorance of people of earth who are still staying in medieval state of Mind. We're done. No more exploration in space or progress of Science for those who do not even know its value.

[Chuck6360]

the soviet scientists and the scientists around the world although he knew nothing about the science. Bill "Kissing" was a kiss ass as his name says and he was a great scam.

[Chuck6360]

Bill Keysing didnt even have the basic knowledge in Science. He received only bachelor of Arts in the university not a degree in Science or Mathematics. So, the basis of moon landing theory found by Bill "Kissing" was very feeble and scanty. Also, He made a great error by saying that one does not need an engineering or science degree to determine that a hoax was being perpetrated. So, He claimed that he knew more than

[Chuck6360]

no to the fictional fact that the moon landing was faked. So the fact that the theorists found the evidence of forgery of lunar landing proove that the lunar landing was in fact real. And if it was faked, it wouldnt be Bill Keysing recognizing it. It would be the astronomers and scientists all over the world especially the soviet scientsts and cosmonauts.

[Chuck6360]

of today and the fact that you found a lots of so called evidence and scientific errors prooving that the moon landing was a hoax. The movie called "Apollo moon landing" is just horrible movie and even more horrible than "Avatar" of james cameron made by non scientists. And that is contradictory with the historical facts that NASA and US gouverment spent more than 10 billion dollars on the program. The fact that you found the proofs of moon hoax theory is condtradictory with

[Chuck6360]

Even the most ambitious science fiction movie of nowaday spend no more that 1 billion dollar. If US gouvernment and NASA spent much more that 1 billion dollar, how is it possible that you who are not even a scientist can say that the moon lading movie is fake? You guys shouldnt even be able to recognize it because of its scientific accuracy. If we consider the fact that there is a lots of scientic error in SF movies

[Chuck6360]

US gouvernment and NASA spent more than 10 billion dollars on the moon program. if they faked it and as you guys said "faked it in the studio in hollywood", they should have made it with no scientific error because there were russian scientists watching the lunar landing. That was possible because the movie "2001 space odyssey" which came out in 1968 was a masterpiece with the rigorous scientific accuracy.

[Chuck6360]

it even measure the a dosage of 30 millirads (0.3 milligrays) per day. I;m sure you won't be able to understand what that meant!!! the average human receives a dose of 2 to 3 mGy on earth and guess what you keep trolling on youtube even if you are receiving the radioactivity! And suppose that we faked the lunar landing that how the hell the soviet scientsts and astronauts watching on TV the moon landing didn't recognize its forgery? Because they are silly red soviets?

[Chuck6360]

The soviets were capable of sending the men on the moon but they didn;t have enough funding to support the technology. So, they couldnt make it. The soviet and american scientists knew about the radioactivity in space more than you . And there is no way of trolling on them for you. And there is even the fact that Luna 9 as it flew to the moon and landed on the moon found that the radioactivity on the moon surface varied a lot.

[Chuck6360]

 Bill Keysing the father of moon hoax theory was a Loser with capital L!!!

[Chuck6360]

Isn't it strange that the most of the moon hoax theorists are TV program producer or pseudoscientsts?

[Chuck6360]

Yuri gagarin's flight was faked? Please stop bullshitting and stop trolling. And stop being on the youtube. Already, there are too much misery going around the world. And you should not do it more. Bill Keysing is such a sleaze. He couldn't get over the fact that he was booted out from the rocketdyne company. And he couldnt get over with it until the day he died. Bill Keysing resigning form the recoketdyne for personal reasons yeah yeah. He was fired because he was incompetent.

[Chuck6360]

And you are an hoax because even the russian cosmonauts like Alexei Leonov who was participating on soviet moon program said that the conspiracy theorists like you are the most greedy people on earth seeking the celebrity. The conspiracy theorists are from medieval periode or they are the pseudoscientsts. And i'm sick of your guys because you re even saying that Yuri gagarin was never in the space.

[Chuck6360]

could have the unmanned probe Zond 5 flying over the moon with the russian tortoises which are more sensible to the radioactivity than the cosmonauts. Besides, this turtoises returned to Earth safely. Furthermore, NASA used the interplanetary satellites Pioneer 6, Pioneer 7,Pioneer 8,Pioneer 9 to observe the solar activity and solar wind during the apollo mission to tell when the apollo spacecraft had to be launched to do the safe flight.

[lancer525]

All you people who think we did not land on the moon, are idiots who simply refuse to accept any evidence that doesn't support your ridiculous contention. You can scream all you want, but the facts refute you. You just choose to ignore them.

[un4g1v3n1]

@lancer525 Unless you do the research yourself, you show how much of an idiot you are! Once you learn the true environment of space within and beyond our magnetosphere, you'll continue to make statements which shows exactly how ignorant, and gullible you are!!!

[lancer525]

@un4g1v3n1 I'm a Director for an Aerospace company. There is not one single verifiable, scientifically provable piece of evidence that exists saying the landings were faked. As bad as Governments are at concealing things, do you think that the US Government could conceal something like that? No, wait... You don't think. If you did, you would realize that the truth is, the landings are fact. If you think anything else, you've been brainwashed, and are not willing to examine the actual evidence.

[lancer525]

@un4g1v3n1 I'm a Director for an Aerospace company. There is not one single verifiable, scientifically provable piece of evidence that exists proving the landings were faked. As bad as Governments are at concealing things, do you think that the US Government could conceal something like that? No, wait... You don't think. If you did, you would realize that the truth is, the landings are fact. If you think anything else, you've been brainwashed, and are not willing to examine the actual evidence.

[lancer525]

@un4g1v3n1 I'm a Director for an Aerospace company. There is not one single verifiable, scientifically provable piece of evidence that exists proving the landings were faked. As bad as Governments are at concealing things, do you think that the US Government could conceal something like that? No, wait... You don't think. If you did, you would realize that the truth is, the landings are fact. If you think anything else, you've been brainwashed, and are not willing to accept any evidence.

[un4g1v3n1]

@lancer525 As a director of an Aerospace company, you sure offer up the most lame RED HERRING, I've had yet...The US GOVERNMENT concealed the MANHATTAN PROJECT QUITE WELL. It depends on the level of import. A Presidential blowjob, does not equate with a 30 plus billion dollar con job, propaganda campaign!

You are either brainwashed, or suffering from a severe form of cognitive dissonance. Radiologists who are aware of the radiation in space are aware of this scam. You sir, are an idiot!

[un4g1v3n1]

@un4g1v3n1 A director of an AEROSPACE COMPANY...and you've subscribed to the SESAME STREET CHANNEL! You are so full of shit, a six year old could smell it!

[forestinfullbloom]

@un4g1v3n1 LOL Sesame street channel. Ha ha ha.

[stalkervision]

@un4g1v3n1 LMAO ! He has too, That;s where nasa got the rest of it's moon puppet's from when Disney wanted too much money after the first few missions to do it again.

[stalkervision]

Neil Armstrong was the only one to train in this machine while his "co=pilot" Buzz Adrien never ever did. A very very very odd thing if you know aviation practices whatsoever. Later Neil claimed it was imperative that he trained on this machine for the moon flight. He was apparently only able to successfully fly the mission sim trainer,not the llrv, with two weeks to go before the missions. No complete unedited film of a LLRV taking off,flying around and landing as is claimed apparently exist.

[un4g1v3n1]

@stalkervision Is this video suppose to prove conclusively that art imatates fiction?

[stalkervision]

@un4g1v3n1 Looks like that's true buddy.

[un4g1v3n1]

@un4g1v3n1 Someone should call your boss and tell him/her, that you are wasting company time arguing about the Apollo Fairy Tale nearly everyone with any intelligence has already figured out!!

RIGHT? For those unaware, this propaganda technique is called the EXPERT WITNESS..or something like that. lancer is full of crap! Probably just another PAN troll, cruising the web to spread his stupidity!

[TheHeather1985]

@un4g1v3n1 watch?v=isVO9AAAhxM clip 2. Explain how a bag can be flung like that unless the astronauts were in a vacuum and in the presence of a gravitational field. Come on Buck don't just run away and not answer it. Remember how you did that on the discussion of stars being seen from orbit but not on the moon? Or when you thought a satellite taking a picture of a city block meant it could take a picture of a rover on the moon? Explain how the bag moved like that enlightened one.

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 Stop trolling with the apollo hoax theory, No scientists even the russian scientists who participated in Space program didn't say the moon landing was fake. I do not know if you are aware of the fact that the most of the particles locating in Van Allan Velt can be kept away even with the paper? The aluminium wall of the apollo spacecraft was enough to stop the particles. And if we were not able to pass the van allen belt how the hell the russian scientists

[un4g1v3n1]

@Chuck6360 Stoip trolling? Really? Guess you are incapable of reading. Six months ago I gave up on ole lancer...Here's your chance to wake up...Ready? watch?v=6aWUa5l_WNs Your aluminum lie is clearly shot to hell by a radiation EXPERT. If you really want to stop deluding yourself, watch the entire video. If you are just like most trolls, I left a nice litle shortcut to the portion of the video that proves my point at the top of the comments. Now, take your red herring and piss off!

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 Is that all you got you bitich? 

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 Sorry but the radiation expert did the experience and confirmed that aluminium worked better than your ass.

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 It this the answer you give? You didn't read my entire answer you prick. This is a retarded trolling not an adequate answer. Ah Like what Bart sibrel did. Put your hand on the bible and swear that the moon landing was faked?

[un4g1v3n1]

@Chuck6360 You said alumnum was sufficient to stop particles. I gave the video, where a radiation expert explains to you, how instead of stopping the particles, it causes fragmentation, increasing the particle count, and lowering the atomic value causing them to stick in the skin of people. Now, if you prefer to keep your head lodged firmly up your ass, I can't really do anything about that now can I? But, trolls like yourself prefer the comfort of your own asses. So be it!

[Chuck6360]

@un4g1v3n1 The actual radiation expert i met said the contrary. And the video you gave me showed only fake radiation expert.

[un4g1v3n1]

@Chuck6360 Really? Eleanor Blakely? Hmm... You sure are a very desperate little troll now aren't you?

[Chuck6360]

What is the name of the radiation expert? Give it! Not a fake name, the real name so i can check if he is a real one.

You re no better than the drug dealer.

[2nasafakedit]

Fake it to the moon

Lol Neil armstrong the Traitor crashed the LLTV on earth in 1968

and Nasa pretended to go to the moon in 1969

Nasa is a Disease

[Popperite]

@atlantis2egypt That's just you talking.....

[wetone1962]

I have this; it is called From The Earth To the Moon. It was played on HBO special small short stories about the Apollo missions. That one was on the making of the LLRV, from its first design to its first touchdown on the moon. So what is your point in showing this? Most of you that are saying the moon landing was a fake were not even born in that era. Just because you never saw some thing with your own eyes doesnt mean it never happened.

[aligoulou]

hard to believe they got it right to land so quick..............

[toddsmitts]

Amazingly, despite coming literally within seconds of death (his chute wouldn't have opened in time had he ejected any later), Neil was back at his desk working that very afternoon like nothing happened! That's just the kind of guy he was.

[Familyguy098]

i have seen the real video of his crash and he barely made it.

[dubran]

I'm still trying to see the real footage. Any ideas!?!

[Familyguy098]

sorry, i tried to find it as well.

u can find a 'picture' of it on Wiki, but the footage i saw was on tv on the series "when we left earth".

[MrFireAss]

lol, faaake

[toddsmitts]

If by "fake", you mean a dramatization of an event that really happened, then yes.

[Roncace]

If you mean the real moon missions were fake, you're wrong

[keithisleofwight]

thats not the real footage, the real stuff is much better and bloody scary

[cadu1995]

watch?v=0XJFwcA7TOI

Watch this-the moon landing faked in Grumman aerospace hangar

[imnazhole]

...and then they went to the moon and landed the REAL THING (untested) flawlessly numerous times.

If you believe that, urnazhole.

[loperspest]

Untested?

Apollo 4 was an unmanned test of the lunar in low earth orbit. Apollo 9 was a manned test in earth orbit, and Apollo 10 was a manned decent test from lunar orbit, without an actual touch down.

Flawless?

Apollo 14 had troubles with the LM docking with the CSM. Apollo 11 had computer troubles. And others if you bothered to look. The fact 6 out of 7 lunar landing missions succeeded is not a sign of a hoax, but of a job well done. You will have to do better if you are to prove your claims.

[lifethelifetoday]

@loperspest Apollo 13 also had docking problems, but then CSM into LM while at earth. And engine problems at start. And a exploding oxygen tank.

[loperspest]

@lifethelifetoday

Yes, of course.

Apollo 13 did have its share of mishaps, but I ran out of space.

[Gromitdog1]

exactly, to the goys paying attention, he ran out of attitude fuel. This is with the benefit or an atmosphere and low velocity. Supposedly...on the moon he slowed down from 10 000 mph and safely landed without running out of control fuel. This is with two guys standing and who knows where the center of gravity would be. Think of a bottle rocket with the stick cut off, it just spins around. The same thing would have happened with the LEM. Just more bs for the goys.

[mooninquirer]

Gromitdog ---- and don't forget, that lame, bored dialogue as they were landing. Totally unrealistic, especially since Buzz Aldrin upped the ante with a story of a last minute glitch, and that they were running out of fuel.

[joachim2464]

this is not real. HTose are actors. It is from the hbo series from the earth to the moon and it is a dramatization of the accident with Neil armstrong.

[garybooker]

Yeah, this was a reinactment.

[F1dude71]

That's awesome footage. Where did it come from? Was that all actual footage, or a dramatization of events afterwards? Amazing guy Neil...