The communists were talking about killing people. And Communists, like Che Guavera, Mao Tse Tung, and Joesph Stalin became the most famous mass-murderers of the 20th century, after the Nazi, Socialists were out of power.
"Marx spoke to this effect: 'The workers' party of Europe takes the most decisive interest in the emancipation of Poland and the original programme of the International Working Men's Association expresses the reunification of Poland as a working-class political aim. What are the reasons for this special interest of the workers' party in the fate of Poland?"
Why do people hate communism? Capitalist kill more the communist do. Explain why we are having a war in Afghanistan and Iraq right now? Because if terrorist? Yes but another reason is because they have oil and America needs oil 70 percent he reason why America is there is because of oil 30 is terrorism. So basically were sending soldiers to die for oil.
@epicduckeh6 Look i didn't mean to insult you , just presumed you are too ignorant and to compare usa to ussr is way over the line , i read a lot about communism , we had communism too in my country , my grandpa was jailed for 1,5 years by the commies because he commited this terrible crime " spreading of forbbiden puplications " , so after 40 years of hardship and death and suffering i was revolted to see someone asking " why do people hate communism ?" . I just assumed everyone knows the truth
everybody knew that communism is just about the leader and the people is slaves and the leader of communist will destroy any thing which stand on their way
If someone makes candles out of their home (where did the materials come from?)and sold them on the internet, that doesn't make them a capitalist. That is someone who took their labor power and crystallized it into a commodity form and sold it in a market. That is not a capitalist. Just because I whore myself on the corner, doesn't make me a capitalist. That makse me a worker because I have to sell my labor power to make a living. Capitalist, read, DO NOT WORK.
Read, Capitalist, as an individual posessing the capital required for the investment. In the candlestick maker example, if the materials are purchased by the maker, that person is an entrepreneur, and not a worker. As an entreprenuer, he is also a capitalist. If you whore yourself, and you invested in the capital goods required to make your business, irrespective of the normative value you've attached, you are a capitalist. An EMPLOYEE is in the employ of the CAPITAL OWNER.
@Zhaojiangjun An employee is someone who sold their labor power, which the capitalist uses to add value to his capital which has no value until labor has acted on it. If I am a plumber that is self employed, yet sells his labor power, that makes me a petty-capitalist (which is not a capitalist in the true sense of the word)
In terms of structural violence, free-market capitalism is surely the biggest killer in history, bar none. But it's all about definitions to prove that your personal opinion is the "correct" one. Truth is that no one actually knows shit. Me included.
Communists and Socialists are different though, there is none Marxist Socialism, yes we share many values and ideals but Socialists who oppose Communism refuse to bow to its racist views against people of religion, it refuses to accept the utopian logic of stateless society, butt classless is acheiveable, we refuse to accept genocidal racism, we refuse to accept 100% public or communal ownership is a good thing.
@vids4dan All that has nothing to do with "funneling" anything. That's called "free enterprise". Start your own business and pay everybody as much as you think they deserve and decide who is productive and who isn't. We'll see if you can balance the books.
@vids4dan Working hard has nothing to do with creating wealth. I can go to my backyard and dig a hole. That will be very hard work. But it doesn't mean that I should be paid for that.
To create wealth you must produce product or service that lots of other people need and willing to pay for.
@ssmusic214 You are completly correct. Commuinists, Socialists and all Collectivests in general think that prosperity and wealth are pre-existing conditions. Like there is some pile of money sitting around and a few greedy people sneaked in and stole most of it for themselves. People who perfer the capitalist system know better. Weath and Prosperity are created by smart entrepreneurs and people who take risks.
@vids4dan In a capitalist state, the wealth is not "funneled" anywhere. Money belong to the people who EARNED it. And the theory that NEVER worked in reality called "fantasy".
@vids4dan WW2 was not about markets. It was a war of territorial conquest. The historical event known as WW2 is correctly refered to & remembered as a war of territorial conquest involving major land battles. National eonomys were radically altered to accomodate the demands of war. Not one single country during WW2 was either economically or militarily fully prepared to fight a war such as that. Especially the Japanese, Italians & Germans. None were ready for full scale world war.
Engels wrote in the January 1849 edition of `Neue Reinische Zeitung` that the Basques, Bretons, Scottish Highlanders & Serbians are all racial trash? This should be taught to the millions of misguided middle-class left-wingers of our societies. There is virtually no difference between the supposedly opposed ideologies of Communism/Socialism & National Socialism/Nazism. Very interesting post.
@vids4dan No-one has ever fought a war in the name of capitalism. You will never see millions of brain-washed human robots marching, waving flags & chanting slogans about fighting for capitalism. World War 2 wasn`t about control of markets. The mountain of human bodies produced in the name of Communism/Socialism is the largest ever created by a political movement.
@vids4dan Socialism is GOVERNMENT MANDATORY REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH. Everything else about socialism is buzzwords, slogans and empty phraseology.
"workers' control of industry" if pure fantasy.
And word "real" in English means something that exists or existed in REALITY. "REAL SOCIALISM" is the one that EXISTED in USSR, China, Nazi Germany, Western Europe, etc....
@vids4dan So......? There was no "global hunger and disease and wars" before Capitalism? And Black Plague of 1300" wiping out at least 80 000 000+ in Europe alone is Capitalism's fault?
@vids4dan So what? Stalin had 1000s of his projects cancelled or switched to military production. What's the difference? And Socialism doesn't necessary means "expropriation". Socialism is government re-distribution of wealth.
@vids4dan Total nonsense! You are blabbing without a clue. "Volkswagen was originally founded in 1937 by the Nazi trade union, the German Labour Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront). "Type 1 Cabriolet was presented to Hitler on 20 April 1938 (his 49th birthday)". Nazi party had TOTAL CONTROL over all aspects of economy. And slave workers were forced into German factories from all over Europe.
Lot's of very ignorant comments here. Communism and fascism are oppòsites? Please! Didnt you watch this documentary? Socialists obviously dont read history, politics or economics. If they did they would instantly stop being socialists. It's all extreme statism. Power (and total abuse) in the hands of "The people" or a dictator. "The people" means the state. If you believe in "The people rule" then you have been suckered just like millions of dead fools before you.
@ssmusic214 Indeed you are quite right, as this documentary clearly shows. This is the point most people are sorely missing.It's all just evil statism.
@caisamadrid dude you dont read history or economic. fascism is based off of duty and race. communism is equality and class. fascist have race war we have class war. not only that but ever fascist regime kill thousdands of communist in there country. capitalist usaley work with fascist. Hitler work with many of the liberal parties of germany before taking over. America has set up so many fascist dictator around the world to combat communism!
@ssmusic214 in history you. Soviet Union was one of the first country to give equal rights to women and all ethic groups. Mao gave women rights and a voice in china. If you read the communist manifesto you would know communism is a society without out class, so it is a society based on equality. read a book sometime
@Unitedworkernation Poland gave birth to the first true european democracy which meant all citizents were free, the worlds first national education system was created by poles givin every poles a chance to gain education even the poor. And guess what ? Marx hated poles for who they were, freedom loving people who wanted peace and equality in race and religion. Poland before its dawnfall in 1795 were the most multinatioal, multiracial and mulltiraeligious nation in europe, yet they were despised
@Unitedworkernation Carl Marx hated poland just the same way as Hitler did. Poland was a nation strongly mixed. Poles, Lithuanians, Byelorussians, Ukrainians, Russians, Jews, Muslim Tatars, Scots and Germans and with Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants, Judaists and Muslims were all living all together in peace and harmony. For Marx it was insanity and thats why he claimed that Poles deserved to be exterminated, Carl Marx was simply a madman, bloody anarchist and disgusting racist
@PolishWingedHussar10 seening how you cant spell his name right i dont think you know alot about Karl Marx. Marx being a German Jew was in away a mixed race so why would he care about other races in Poland? you ev only keep saying karl marx is a racist who hates Poland but were the proof? Karl Marx believe that race is just another thing that alienates man from eachother and we need to stop seeing eachother as races and just as one human race
@Unitedworkernation Historian in this documentery clearly tells and highlights that ''Poland had no right to exist'' in the words of Marx ''The clasess and races too weak to master new conditions of life must give away ... they must perish in revolutionary holocaust'' Karl Marx . Poles who were among those who pioneered democracy must perish .... total absurd
@PolishWingedHussar10 you cleary miss used that quete from Karl Marx, he ment the death of classes and races, the death of the concept of races and classes, because races and classes are what divide mankind
@Unitedworkernation Doesnt matter. You might be right at some extent when he meant the death of clasess and races which divides people but one thing is certain in his words ''races too weak to master new conditions of life must give away .. they must perish in revolutionary holocaust'' Karl Marx . they must perish. How do you understand that ?? Evaporate, Teleport or Move to another planet ?? All fairy tales, they must be killed thats how people simply perish in our world and thats what he meant
@PolishWingedHussar10 Fredrich Engels was a Communist who worked with Karl Marx to write the Communist Manifesto, a raging left wing Facist, who was evil and genocidal, yes he wrote some good things for workers rights we dont deny this, but his racial work was wrong.
@Unitedworkernation Fascism is nationalism but Nazism is nationalism & racism based upon the generally accepted scientific views of race at that time. Every regime that has ever existed has killed their opponents to protect & maintain their power. Capitalist private business will usually work with the strongest global economies (ie China). Communists spread their political delusions & propaganda to reduce us to an atheistic global dictatorship & concentration camp for the enitre of humanity.
@vids4dan Nonsense! Hitler introduced to Germany Job Security, Social Security, Socialized Education, Health Care, Government redistribution of Wealth and control of economy, Subsidized housing, government price control, wage control, subsidized “transportation for the people” (Volkswagen) and even subsidized recreation (Kraft Durch Freude). You can’t get more socialist than that.
Often ppl think capitalism is very bad, especially now with the current crisis. And they have a point if u look at labour conditions in 3rd world countries. But communism as a alternative is much worse. Many ppl don't realise.
@dekippiesip The current crisis is caused in the same way as all other recessions/depressions. It's due to fractional reserve banking activities directed by a central bank. Labor conditions in 3rd world countries are due to poverty, and the onlyway to solve poverty is increased savings driving capital investment activities. The only conclusion we get from this is we need MORE CAPITALISM.
In 1957, Soviet authorities admitted 20 to 40 million overall had died since the October “revolution” of 1917 (more like a Jewish coup d’etat). Alexander Solzhenitzyn said his demographic source in the Kremlin pegged the number at 66 million dead from Communism.
Also, according to Solzhenitzyn, at least 60% of the Cheka/NKVD/KGB were Jews.
so far in re to the millions claimed to have ben killed by commies all i've seen is hearsay and projections. the 11 million people that went missing during wwii (6 million jews and 5 million dissidents) are documented and recorded in history, which occured during the 1950's when a census was taken. all in all it looks like more lying propaganda crap from the neo-con-nazis than anything else when they refer to the 'millions' killed by commies.
@vengencefrom1979 "When Israeli historians Yehuda Bauer and Yisrael Gutman challenged Wiesenthal on this point, he admitted that he had invented the figure of eleven million victims in order to stimulate interest in the Holocaust among non-Jews."
And that 6mio figure is longtime dead. Everyone having watched "onethirdofaholocaust" or "buchenwald- a dumb dumb portrayal of evil" breaks out in laughter over your comment. Now piss-off commie scum.
@muzzster1970 Hitler told his Nazi youth that by the time they were running Germany that there would be no social classes. That is also a major aspect of Commuism. Not a very Right wing thing is it?
@willmickel71 that funny considering that the nazi youth and the communist youth would kill eachother in germany. why the capitalist dogs would fund Hitler party
@Unitedworkernation Its obvious you wont believ that what a just wrote so grab a book or go to the wikipedia and learn more about poland. Democracy, freedom of all people, racial and religious freedom. These things were being born in mainly such countries like United States, France, Ancient Greece and Poland. First election of kings in europe was in poland and for the rest of european monarchies it was a sick and insane idea. Marx hated poles because they loved democracy and freedom... true fact
@PolishWingedHussar10 yeah most of the people who started freedom in France were socialist if you didnt know marx consider the french revolution and the french comunes that came after it marxist
@Unitedworkernation Yes all the aspects in the Marxism was perfectly executed in french revolution, the massive war of clasess resulted in massive bloodshed of thousand of people were murdered or even "massacred". All the roads which led to the french democracy was soaked red in blood of thousands so you are very right. Enitire upper clasess were beheaded by crowds full of vengance and hatred
@Unitedworkernation But dont you dare even compare french to the poles . French succeded democracy in massive bloodshed and murder, poles in the great need for reforms took steps to gain democracy and freedom in peace and with calm. Offcourse there were some people who strongly opposed it but they simply were convince of ideas of freedom. Polish King said 'If poland wont reform, it wil erase itself' and achieved freedom of all, unfortunatly neighbours hated these ideas and took up drastic steps
Their were social classes in Nazi Germany you idiot, their where millionaires such as Albert Krupp and Fredrick Flick and poor people such as factory workers who had no right to strike or complain about their wealth employers.
Hitler made German Jews, homosexuals, communists second class citizens.
@MrReco12 In reality there is no such thing as a classless society. The soviet union had social classes they had corporations and workers were paid wages. Workers in the Soviet Union were not allowed to strike or complain as well. If you have ever heard of the solidarity movement you would know this fact. However, Hitler said that there would be no social classes in 'Triumph of the Will " . Communists make the same claim but it never becames true. Utopian societies are for the true idiots!!!
@willmickel71 Not at all. There is such thing as building legitimacy and socialism was apowerful movemetn in Germany. How else can you win over a populace with a ruling class controlled government by making empty promises of classlessness and new beginnings?
@Tougemaster06 The truth is that the concept of socialism did not originate from the "proletarian mind." No proletarian or son of a proletarian contributed any substantial idea to the socialist ideology. The intellectual fathers of socialism were members of the intelligentsia, scions of the "bourgeoisie." Ludwig von Mises
@willmickel71 No. That is a worker. A capitalist is someone who owns the means of production and is apart of the ruling class of society. A self employed carpenter didn't a $878 Billion dollar bailout...
@Tougemaster06 A capitalist is someone who owns the means of production. However the vast majority of people that own businesses do not belong to some elite ruling class. A self employed person by definition owns his own means of production. Self employment means you are both owner and worker. If someone made candles out of their home then sold them on the internet. That person is a Capitalist. If someone grows produce in their back yard and sells it for money. That person is a Capitalist.
@willmickel71 Wrong. Small business owner is a petty-bourgeoise, or petty capitalist. Capitalist do not work. Small business owners still work in their businesses. Thus, they do not qualify as capitalist. They do however have a false capitalist conscious and think of themselves as rich people even though they are two steps away from being unemployed like normal workers. Marx viewed them as counterrevolutionary because they would hold down working people to defend their privileged position.
@Tougemaster06 Understanding Marxism and seeing the world from that narrow dogmatic view are very different. I don't take any ideology simply at face value. Before accepting Marxism you might want to play devil's advocate and look how it would exist in practical teams not just fantasy.
@willmickel71 What is practical about Stalinism? Stalinism was a doctrine of governance and foreign policy. It wasn't ideological nor theoretical. The 20th century Communist states were totalitarian because they were forced to comply with Stalinist policies through the Comintern (The Communist bloc's version of the Washington Concensus).
@willmickel71 Hitlers promises and what he lead people to believe has nothing to do with what his party actually were. A dictatorship is as far from Marxism as you can get.
@elco9791 Yet Maxism produced some of the worst dictators in world history. Mao Ze-Dong, Josef Stalin, Kim Il Sung, Pol Pot , Fidel Castro, Vladimir Lenin, Ho Chi Min, Kim Jong-il all were dictators. A logical conclusion would have to suggest that Maxism is itself fundamentally flawed. It is not possible to argue that each individual should sacrifice for the whole of society, and yet expect each individual to know what "society's good" consists of, without having a dictator to tell them.
@willmickel71 Hitler made the working class very very poor, didnt nationalise any institutions, and under the war several private owners got rich from producing. Not very left winged is it?
@gulbirk The Nazi regime had dictatorship powers over the German economy. They Nationalised health care, the automobile industry, the construction industry, the Railway industry and agriculture. Very left wing indeed.
It wasnt nationalised. it was banned from being owned by anyone non german.
""They nationalised health care"" there were lots of private hospitals. All of these other construction things were nationalised BECAUSE it was war time. It wasnt a strategic build up.
Besides, the rich still got richer because there were owners. For crying out loud, several owners of construction companies who contstructed military devices became rich.
@gulbirk "Most cruel joke of all, however, has been played by Hitler & Co. on those German capitalists and small businessmen who once backed National Socialism as a means of saving Germany's bourgeois economic structure from radicalism. The Nazi credo that the individual belongs to the state also applies to business. Some businesses have been confiscated outright, on other what amounts to a capital tax has been levied. Profits have been strictly controlled.
@gulbirk Some idea of the increasing Governmental control and interference in business could be deduced from the fact that 80% of all building and 50% of all industrial orders in Germany originated last year with the Government. Hard-pressed for food- stuffs as well as funds, the Nazi regime has taken over large estates and in many instances collectivized agriculture, a procedure fundamentally similar to Russian Communism." Time Magazine Jan 2, 1939
@willmickel71 Actually, its not similar at all. Russia had communism. So they lived by that. NAZI germany taxes high to get money for warfare and instrastructure (though allot of companies producing materials used in warfare were private. I dont see the NAZI`s nationalising these businesses, only restricting them. Also, there was not an increase in welfare either, so I dont know how much of a left state it really was.
@gulbirk It is ironic that you would mention the Soviet Union. The most militaristic society of the 20th century. In the Soviet Union working class pay and working conditions were the worst of any industrial nation. The same harsh working conditions could be found in Mao's China. I don't think I even need to bring up North Korea. Workers paradise my ass!!
@willmickel71 I brought it up. I never defended it. As for working conditions, they mainly turned bad with Stalin, thought they were far from perfect under lenin.
But they never lacked anything under Lenin, which is why its a left winged society. You wouldnt die of hunger because you didnt have money. You wouldnt end up on street. The security was very good. The security didnt EXIST in Nazi germany. Almost nothing was spent at creating a socialist society. Not a mark.
@gulbirk You would die of hunger because the Communist government would cut off food supplies and starve you to death. You wouldn't be on the streets because you would go to a labor camp or a concentration camp. An idea the Nazis stole from the Communists. The only people who had security were the elites who ran the government. Most people lived in fear.
@NiceGuyCody BULLSHIT. Provide sources to back that up if that is not bullshit. I had relatives who actually visisted the USSR. Surprisingly enough, allot of people were not only filled, but fat. Housing was a right. The number of people living on the street is lower then in many western countries today. Life expectensy went through the ROOF after they took over, and it went down when the USSR collapses.
" the government of the National Socialist Party sold off public ownership in several state-owned firms in the middle of the 1930s. The firms belonged to a wide range of sectors: steel, mining, banking, local public utilities, shipyard, ship-lines, railways, etc. In addition to this, delivery of some public services produced by public administrations prior to the 1930s, especially social services and services related to work, was transferred to the private sector"
@MrReco12 Reimann quotes from a businessman's letter: "You have no idea how far state control goes and how much power the Nazi representatives have over our work. The worst of it is that they are so ignorant. These Nazi radicals think of nothing except 'distributing the wealth.' Some businessmen have even started studying Marxist theories, so that they will have a better understanding of the present economic system.
"Because of the rivalries between the many political parties in Germany and the general disorder there was no opportunity for prosperity. ... We thought that Hitler would give us such a healthy environment. Indeed he did do that."
@MrReco12 While state representatives are busily engaged in investigating and interfering, our agents and salesmen are handicapped because they never know whether or not a sale at a higher price will mean denunciation as a 'profiteer' or 'saboteur,' followed by a prison sentence. You cannot imagine how taxation has increased. Yet everyone is afraid to complain. Everyone has his doubts about the system, unless he is very young, very stupid, or is bound to it by the privileges he enjoys
@willmickel71 "There are terrible times coming. If only I had succeeded in smuggling out $10,000 or even $5,000, I would leave Germany with my family. Business friends of mine are convinced that it will be the turn of the 'white Jews' (which means us, Aryan businessmen) after the Jews have been expropriated. The difference between this and the Russian system is much less than you think, despite the fact that we are still independent businessmen."
@MrReco12 There is a bit of a difference in the ant-semitism of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. To be a Sabbath Jew, meaning one who keeps with the Sabbath, celebrating Hanukkah, Passover or going to synagogue were not acceptable in Communist communist society. Nor could one be a party member for doing so. The Nazis made no distinction between a Sabbath or Secular Jew.
I believe Stalin had Trotsky killed in Mexico long after events like "The Night of the Murdered Poets".
"state atheism" was the official policy of the soviet union and they closed down quite a few religious buildings. However, in the fascist states(Germany, Italy, Spain) synagogues were closed while catholic and protestant churches were allowed to remain open.
@MrReco12 Synagogues in Spain and Italy remained open. Franco and Mussolini were evil dictators but did not share Hitlers hate of Jews. Spain was a safe haven for all Jewish refugees and antisemitism was not official policy under the Franco regime. Jew were also members of Mussollini's Fascist party for almost 20 years until 1938 when Hitler demanded they be removed from the party.
@willmickel71 The Church and fascism could never have a lasting connection because both are a "holistic Weltanschauung" claiming the whole of the person. h Hitler and Mussolini were anticlerical, they both understood that it would be rash to begin their "Kulturkampfs" prematurely, such a clash, possibly inevitable in the future, were put off while they dealt with other enemies
@iwannabethekid34x Vladimir Lenin killed about around 30,000 dissidents between the years of 1917-1920. He was involved in the creation of the bolshevik "vanguard" party and it was said that since its sole purpose was to protect and defend the people or "proletariat", one could not legitimately question or criticize the bolsheviks. Thus, from this Stallin was merely using this x10, or exploiting it further. (cont.)
@iwannabethekid34x Lenin was responsible for the deaths of around about 30,000 dissidents between the years of 1917-1920. He was involved in the creation of the bolshevik "vanguard" party, in which it was said that since its sole purpose was to protect and defend the people or "proletariat", one could not legitimately criticize the bolsheviks. Thus, Stallin was merely using this principle on steroids, or as I would like to say, he was exploiting a loophole in Marxist-Leninist theory. (cont.)
@iwannabethekid34x Lenin was responsible for the deaths of around about 30,000 dissidents between the years of 1917-1920. He was involved in the creation of the Bolshevik "vanguard" party, in which it was said that since its sole purpose was to protect and defend the people or "proletariat", one could not legitimately criticize the Bolsheviks. Thus, Stallin was merely using this principle on steroids, or as I would like to say, he was exploiting a loophole in Marxist-Leninist theory. (cont.)
@iwannabethekid34x Lenin was responsible for the deaths of around about 30,000 dissidents between the years of 1917-1920. He was involved in the creation of the Bolshevik "vanguard" party, in which it was said that since its sole purpose was to protect and defend the people or "proletariat", one could not legitimately criticize the Bolsheviks. Thus, Stallin was merely using this principle on steroids, or as I would like to say, he was exploiting a loophole in Marxist-Leninist theory. (cont.)
@iwannabethekid34x (cont.) and just to show you the hypocracy of the 1918 R.S.F.S. constitution, it states:
Article Ch.13 sect. 64. The right to vote and to be elected to the soviets is enjoyed by the following citizens of both sexes, irrespective of religion, nationality, domicile, etc., yet it goes on to say that (d) Monks and clergy of all denominations aren't even allowed to vote even if they work& are productive but at Article 2 Ch. 5 Sect. 18. (cont.)
@iwannabethekid34x (cont.) 18. The Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic considers work the duty of every citizen of the Republic, and proclaims as its motto: 'He shall not eat who does not work.'
This quote is biblical scripture, so in other words... "ummm yeah the bible is right but we're deffinately not going to follow it... ok, ok, exept for this part but we're atheists...oh and church leaders, tho you speak truth, you can't vote... or face Gulag!!!
@iwannabethekid34x Halloooooo....... When the government controls how much you are paid and how much you pay for food and which store you are allowed to shop.....
And Stalinism is the ONLY reality under communist rule. Any other is just a fantasy.
@ssmusic214 Communism, socialism, liberalism founded by the "jews". Historical fact: Marx, Lenin, and Trotsky were all "jews". Read proof: THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION. And the "jewish" talmud. Don't take my word for it, read these books. Dean Berry Ministries
@HDEANBERRYDOTCOM "PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION" is fake hoax created in Russia in 1910"s . The myth that was actually plagiarized from a 19th century French political satire in which the alleged plotters weren’t even Jewish.
And there weren't any jews in Chinese Communist party of 20 000 000+. More than twice the size of CPSU.
You fucking commies are no better then these nazies. Maybe youre even worst, because nazis did genocide for 5 years, and you did it for 71 year. Can't believe that there are still idiots you believe in communism. Shit, even Mussolini was ex-commie.
How retarted can you be to say that Pol Pot regime is good, or North Korea regime is good, or chinese. For me, commies are even worst then nazis. But they are children of one and the same people. Youre no better then nazis. Fucking idiots.
@samirbalonmano The worst of all are Americans and English, they destroyed millions of peoples and dozens of nation. I think our Lord divided them on purpose from other people by water. Any time you open your mouth to accuse, even Hitler, remember: Indians, Vietnam, Korea, Laos, Kampuchia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama, Grenada, Yougoslavia. Spend more time in the sun, you must adjust at heat while you are living.
@tagaphon Half of those counted country's Russians and commies attacked, or helped the conflict by helping and financing terrorist actions of commies around the world. In all those places commies are as the second side of conflict, and second attacker. In the middle are those people from small country's.
All those the bloodiest regimes from Pol Pot to Castro was directly financed and organized by russians and commies. So you just proved my point.
@samirbalonmano Don't try to be more stupid that you are! There is no excuse for Vietnam and Agent Orange, for Yugoslavia, and Afghanistan, and Iraq. The imagined crimes of somebody else is no excuse for crimes. Any murderer must be punished, no matter what he lies.
@tagaphon Yougoslavia was never attacked by Americans, but it was by USSR in 1948. Also it was reported that Red Army raped and pillaged, even worse then Germans did. Also, genocide on small nations is something that Imperial Russia, and later communistic Russia under the mask of socialism did a lot. Soviet had they're indians also, and what happened to them? Same thing as did to american natives, and all others. I'm saying that commies as a third side finances and helped terrorism.
@samirbalonmano Are you two years old? 2000 civilian Yugoslavs are dead as result of American bombing. Don't speak about Russian genocide, your forefathers killed every nation on American continent, in New Zealand and many others, while in Russia live all the nations that joined Russia, exactly each one.
@tagaphon That is nothing compared to 6 million famined to death by commies. All nations were joined by force in USSR. You will tell me that Russians didn't killed Hungarians, and Czechs, and Polish in the time after second world war? Same killing and deportation happened to Estonians, Litvanians, Chechens, and all other small nations in soviet russia. So, your forefathers did the same to all nations that were close to Russia. In 1939 commies attacked Poland with nazi's, and KATIN is proof.
@samirbalonmano you invent crimes of communism long ago, which nobody can check cuz English internet is censored, so nobody remembers murders you commit every day. Yesterday you killed 9 civilians in Afghanistan, you capitalists admitted that, and I don't know how many you killed really. As well I don't know how many people kills heroin that Karzai produces together with Americans. As known Talibs destroyed and are still destroying puppy fields.
@samirbalonmano The Jews, cousins of Zhirinovski, are ruling you. Fuck of from Chechnya topic, you still didn't apologize about Afghanistan and Iraq. As soon you leave all occupied countries, apologize, pay all widows and orphan children compensation, rebuild both countries as they were before you invided, only then you'll get right to speak about human rights elsewhere.
The reason the posters look similar is gobshite Goebbels was uncreative, he copied the propaganda of other countries all the time. He copied American marketing commercials, and he copied the Soviet posters, he just ripped them off. You could show American commercials that looked similar to Nazi propaganda to try and say America is fascist, and it would be equally as stupid. Whoever made this film must've been on some heavy drugs.
Nazis were like socialists except for the fact that they were nationalist, racist, regarded women as a lesser sex, christian, had rich and poor citizens, selling products for a profit... THAT ISN'T SOCIALIST AT ALL YOU FUCKING RETARDS. Why do you think Marxists went to the same fucking death camps? Read a book, Google it, just get some fucking facts into your head and stop siding with people feeding you the same anti-Marxist propaganda the Nazis used to feed.
@thealmightypidgeon So when Karl Marx talsk about inferior races that must dissapear in "holocaust", that is not so bad? Socialism is even worst, because of it's sinister abusing of humain ideas for they're purpose.
I truly believe that russian socialism is in fact hidden national-socialism. Just look what have russians done to small country of East Europe under the mask of "social justice". They have deported people and on they're land put Russians. Proof? Litvanian Kaliningrad....
@samirbalonmano Socialism is now somehow WORSE than fascism? Nowhere in the book does it say anything about killing any race. The point is to eliminate the upper and ruling classes, not by killing them, only by removing their ability to control others. You can't change someone's race, but you can very easily change their class. They expelled German citizens from Kaliningrad, because Soviets gained that territory from the Nazis, just a normal part of the war pushing to Berlin.
@thealmightypidgeon My point exactly. If that genocide and etnic cleansing was by classes, then only rich Germans would be deported. But instead under the mask of "justice for all" Russians stole, deported, robbed and killed almost half of Europe for 40 years. Proof for that is bloodbath in Hungary, Czech, Poland, Afghanistan, and later in Chechenia. So, you used class war in race and nation war.
This clip is not talking about BOOK, it talks about newspapers that Karl Marx was leading.
@samirbalonmano No, rich Germans would become poor Germans. If they were fascist, they would have killed the German citizens instead of deporting them. That has nothing to do with racism, just the Soviets were not able to force German citizens to become Soviet citizens, as Kaliningrad was at that point a part of the USSR. The rest of your cited events are grossly oversimplified, their agenda was to make the world communist, so they operated to that end. That's what first world governments do.
@thealmightypidgeon That is what Im saying, Russians took other people's land, and deported and killed other nations for it. "Grossly oversimplified"???? They're agenda was russian national-socialism under the mask of socialism. Even today they do the same. If socialism and national-socialism are not two sides of one same mirror, why is then 50 % of all worlds national-socialists in Russia? Why is then a national-socialist in Duma? Why is then attacking foreigners every day thing in Russia?
@samirbalonmano Yes, and the Soviet government that replaced their governments was better. It's called liberation. It was their objective, and it was a just objective until Gorbachev diverted and caused economic collapse. Answer me this, if Christianity and Islam aren't the same thing, why are there muslims in America? See, it's a stupid question and it doesn't make a point. There are some nationalists in Russia, there are nationalists everywhere. It has no bearing on socialism.
@samirbalonmano In fact by that logic you're calling your own country a Nazi country, every country has neo-Nazis. Russia is a larger country with more people, so they have a few more neo-Nazis as well. You can't honestly think they say "Well the Soviet Union loved Nazism, so I will too!", that doesn't even begin to make sense.
I realize most people don’t have the time or patience to study 20th century Russian history, but it’s still incredible to see just how gullible people are.
And the simpler "the truth" that is being fed to them, the more likely they are to believe it, which is why the Soviet Story has convinced so many simpletons.
«Factor VI -- Cattle: Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.»
-- Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars
Check out the official website for more background information and DVD orders:
The truth is that there was never communist as written by Marx and Engels. The "communism" we see around the world was Stalinism.And that ideology was the state(dictator) is supreme and to create a utopian society.They have to get rid of any opposition.Which is common in totalitarian regimes.
Totalitarian regimes based on Stalinism regime that use any means to maintain power.Communist state has never existed and can't exist.Communism is a classless,stateless country.In reality idealism doesn't worked. You need a mixed economy otherwise you won't last. US is learning that the hard way.If a so called communist country wasn't buying up the debt then US would probably go bankrupt.
“Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it; no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it.” - James Madison
The communists were talking about killing people. And Communists, like Che Guavera, Mao Tse Tung, and Joesph Stalin became the most famous mass-murderers of the 20th century, after the Nazi, Socialists were out of power.
Barry62152 1 month ago
"Marx spoke to this effect: 'The workers' party of Europe takes the most decisive interest in the emancipation of Poland and the original programme of the International Working Men's Association expresses the reunification of Poland as a working-class political aim. What are the reasons for this special interest of the workers' party in the fate of Poland?"
-For Poland(24 March, 1875): Engles.
What is it with the Right and lies?
MrReco12 2 months ago
Why do people hate communism? Capitalist kill more the communist do. Explain why we are having a war in Afghanistan and Iraq right now? Because if terrorist? Yes but another reason is because they have oil and America needs oil 70 percent he reason why America is there is because of oil 30 is terrorism. So basically were sending soldiers to die for oil.
epicduckeh6 4 months ago
@epicduckeh6 Dude, oil is oil... Any nation, regardless of ideology, needs to have its hands on oil if it wants to exist in the modern world.
ieatpilli 4 months ago
@epicduckeh6 Are you retarded ? Read "Gulag Arhipelago" ! How can anyone ask that question !?!!?
davazno1 3 months ago
@davazno1 people ask the question all the time so do not insult me and this was a month ago, congrats
epicduckeh6 3 months ago
@epicduckeh6 Look i didn't mean to insult you , just presumed you are too ignorant and to compare usa to ussr is way over the line , i read a lot about communism , we had communism too in my country , my grandpa was jailed for 1,5 years by the commies because he commited this terrible crime " spreading of forbbiden puplications " , so after 40 years of hardship and death and suffering i was revolted to see someone asking " why do people hate communism ?" . I just assumed everyone knows the truth
davazno1 3 months ago
@epicduckeh6 Thats easy, well afghanistan is easy to answer. We have to kill the evil terrorists who we funded with wepons during the cold war.
gulbirk 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my video response.
msinummoc 4 months ago 4
everybody knew that communism is just about the leader and the people is slaves and the leader of communist will destroy any thing which stand on their way
locp8889 5 months ago
If someone makes candles out of their home (where did the materials come from?)and sold them on the internet, that doesn't make them a capitalist. That is someone who took their labor power and crystallized it into a commodity form and sold it in a market. That is not a capitalist. Just because I whore myself on the corner, doesn't make me a capitalist. That makse me a worker because I have to sell my labor power to make a living. Capitalist, read, DO NOT WORK.
Tougemaster06 5 months ago
@Tougemaster06
Read, Capitalist, as an individual posessing the capital required for the investment. In the candlestick maker example, if the materials are purchased by the maker, that person is an entrepreneur, and not a worker. As an entreprenuer, he is also a capitalist. If you whore yourself, and you invested in the capital goods required to make your business, irrespective of the normative value you've attached, you are a capitalist. An EMPLOYEE is in the employ of the CAPITAL OWNER.
Zhaojiangjun 4 months ago 2
@Zhaojiangjun An employee is someone who sold their labor power, which the capitalist uses to add value to his capital which has no value until labor has acted on it. If I am a plumber that is self employed, yet sells his labor power, that makes me a petty-capitalist (which is not a capitalist in the true sense of the word)
Tougemaster06 4 months ago
In terms of structural violence, free-market capitalism is surely the biggest killer in history, bar none. But it's all about definitions to prove that your personal opinion is the "correct" one. Truth is that no one actually knows shit. Me included.
Stealthsuit07 5 months ago
Communists and Socialists are different though, there is none Marxist Socialism, yes we share many values and ideals but Socialists who oppose Communism refuse to bow to its racist views against people of religion, it refuses to accept the utopian logic of stateless society, butt classless is acheiveable, we refuse to accept genocidal racism, we refuse to accept 100% public or communal ownership is a good thing.
CSmoCC 6 months ago
@vids4dan So........?
What else is new? All that has been going for 1000s of years before capitalism.........
ssmusic214 7 months ago
@vids4dan All that has nothing to do with "funneling" anything. That's called "free enterprise". Start your own business and pay everybody as much as you think they deserve and decide who is productive and who isn't. We'll see if you can balance the books.
ssmusic214 7 months ago
@vids4dan Working hard has nothing to do with creating wealth. I can go to my backyard and dig a hole. That will be very hard work. But it doesn't mean that I should be paid for that.
To create wealth you must produce product or service that lots of other people need and willing to pay for.
ssmusic214 7 months ago
@ssmusic214 You are completly correct. Commuinists, Socialists and all Collectivests in general think that prosperity and wealth are pre-existing conditions. Like there is some pile of money sitting around and a few greedy people sneaked in and stole most of it for themselves. People who perfer the capitalist system know better. Weath and Prosperity are created by smart entrepreneurs and people who take risks.
willmickel71 7 months ago 15
@vids4dan In a capitalist state, the wealth is not "funneled" anywhere. Money belong to the people who EARNED it. And the theory that NEVER worked in reality called "fantasy".
ssmusic214 7 months ago
@vids4dan WW2 was not about markets. It was a war of territorial conquest. The historical event known as WW2 is correctly refered to & remembered as a war of territorial conquest involving major land battles. National eonomys were radically altered to accomodate the demands of war. Not one single country during WW2 was either economically or militarily fully prepared to fight a war such as that. Especially the Japanese, Italians & Germans. None were ready for full scale world war.
TheRunica 7 months ago
Engels wrote in the January 1849 edition of `Neue Reinische Zeitung` that the Basques, Bretons, Scottish Highlanders & Serbians are all racial trash? This should be taught to the millions of misguided middle-class left-wingers of our societies. There is virtually no difference between the supposedly opposed ideologies of Communism/Socialism & National Socialism/Nazism. Very interesting post.
TheRunica 7 months ago 2
@vids4dan No-one has ever fought a war in the name of capitalism. You will never see millions of brain-washed human robots marching, waving flags & chanting slogans about fighting for capitalism. World War 2 wasn`t about control of markets. The mountain of human bodies produced in the name of Communism/Socialism is the largest ever created by a political movement.
TheRunica 7 months ago 3
@vids4dan Socialism is GOVERNMENT MANDATORY REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH. Everything else about socialism is buzzwords, slogans and empty phraseology.
"workers' control of industry" if pure fantasy.
And word "real" in English means something that exists or existed in REALITY. "REAL SOCIALISM" is the one that EXISTED in USSR, China, Nazi Germany, Western Europe, etc....
Rest is just fantasies and fairy tales.
ssmusic214 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vids4dan So......? There was no "global hunger and disease and wars" before Capitalism? And Black Plague of 1300" wiping out at least 80 000 000+ in Europe alone is Capitalism's fault?
ssmusic214 7 months ago
@vids4dan So what? Stalin had 1000s of his projects cancelled or switched to military production. What's the difference? And Socialism doesn't necessary means "expropriation". Socialism is government re-distribution of wealth.
ssmusic214 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We are going to bring communism back and you CANNOT stop us! If you try you will get a bullet to the face.
Svperstarr 7 months ago
@vids4dan Total nonsense! You are blabbing without a clue. "Volkswagen was originally founded in 1937 by the Nazi trade union, the German Labour Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront). "Type 1 Cabriolet was presented to Hitler on 20 April 1938 (his 49th birthday)". Nazi party had TOTAL CONTROL over all aspects of economy. And slave workers were forced into German factories from all over Europe.
ssmusic214 7 months ago
idealogy cant kill theses people who talk about nazis and communist be the same dont know what theyre talking about
Unitedworkernation 7 months ago
Lot's of very ignorant comments here. Communism and fascism are oppòsites? Please! Didnt you watch this documentary? Socialists obviously dont read history, politics or economics. If they did they would instantly stop being socialists. It's all extreme statism. Power (and total abuse) in the hands of "The people" or a dictator. "The people" means the state. If you believe in "The people rule" then you have been suckered just like millions of dead fools before you.
caisamadrid 7 months ago
@caisamadrid The only things that are opposite between Communism and fascism are buzzwords, slogans and phraseology. Everything else is the same.
ssmusic214 7 months ago
@ssmusic214 Indeed you are quite right, as this documentary clearly shows. This is the point most people are sorely missing.It's all just evil statism.
caisamadrid 7 months ago
@caisamadrid dude you dont read history or economic. fascism is based off of duty and race. communism is equality and class. fascist have race war we have class war. not only that but ever fascist regime kill thousdands of communist in there country. capitalist usaley work with fascist. Hitler work with many of the liberal parties of germany before taking over. America has set up so many fascist dictator around the world to combat communism!
Unitedworkernation 7 months ago
@Unitedworkernation Communism based on "equality"? Where? When? In your fantasy fairy tales?
ssmusic214 7 months ago
@ssmusic214 in history you. Soviet Union was one of the first country to give equal rights to women and all ethic groups. Mao gave women rights and a voice in china. If you read the communist manifesto you would know communism is a society without out class, so it is a society based on equality. read a book sometime
Unitedworkernation 7 months ago
@Unitedworkernation Poland gave birth to the first true european democracy which meant all citizents were free, the worlds first national education system was created by poles givin every poles a chance to gain education even the poor. And guess what ? Marx hated poles for who they were, freedom loving people who wanted peace and equality in race and religion. Poland before its dawnfall in 1795 were the most multinatioal, multiracial and mulltiraeligious nation in europe, yet they were despised
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago
@Unitedworkernation Nonsense! Neither USSR nor Communist China gave ANY RIGHTS TO ANYBODY.
The ONLY RIGHT anybody ever had there was to OBEY the rulers or be killed.
ssmusic214 7 months ago
@Unitedworkernation Carl Marx hated poland just the same way as Hitler did. Poland was a nation strongly mixed. Poles, Lithuanians, Byelorussians, Ukrainians, Russians, Jews, Muslim Tatars, Scots and Germans and with Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants, Judaists and Muslims were all living all together in peace and harmony. For Marx it was insanity and thats why he claimed that Poles deserved to be exterminated, Carl Marx was simply a madman, bloody anarchist and disgusting racist
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago
@PolishWingedHussar10 seening how you cant spell his name right i dont think you know alot about Karl Marx. Marx being a German Jew was in away a mixed race so why would he care about other races in Poland? you ev only keep saying karl marx is a racist who hates Poland but were the proof? Karl Marx believe that race is just another thing that alienates man from eachother and we need to stop seeing eachother as races and just as one human race
Unitedworkernation 7 months ago
@Unitedworkernation Historian in this documentery clearly tells and highlights that ''Poland had no right to exist'' in the words of Marx ''The clasess and races too weak to master new conditions of life must give away ... they must perish in revolutionary holocaust'' Karl Marx . Poles who were among those who pioneered democracy must perish .... total absurd
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago
@PolishWingedHussar10 you cleary miss used that quete from Karl Marx, he ment the death of classes and races, the death of the concept of races and classes, because races and classes are what divide mankind
Unitedworkernation 7 months ago
@Unitedworkernation Does Engels is a person or a quote ?? I had difficulties in understanding this historian?
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago
@PolishWingedHussar10 what?
Unitedworkernation 7 months ago
Comment removed
PolishWingedHussar10 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Unitedworkernation Doesnt matter. You might be right at some extent when he meant the death of clasess and races which divides people but one thing is certain in his words ''races too weak to master new conditions of life must give away .. they must perish in revolutionary holocaust'' Karl Marx . they must perish. How do you understand that ?? Evaporate, Teleport or Move to another planet ?? All fairy tales, they must be killed thats how people simply perish in our world and thats what he meant
PolishWingedHussar10 6 months ago
@PolishWingedHussar10 Fredrich Engels was a Communist who worked with Karl Marx to write the Communist Manifesto, a raging left wing Facist, who was evil and genocidal, yes he wrote some good things for workers rights we dont deny this, but his racial work was wrong.
CSmoCC 6 months ago
@CSmoCC
Washington and Jefferson wanted to completly wipe out the native americans. They were Right wing fascists like HITLER!
MrReco12 6 months ago
@Unitedworkernation Fascism is nationalism but Nazism is nationalism & racism based upon the generally accepted scientific views of race at that time. Every regime that has ever existed has killed their opponents to protect & maintain their power. Capitalist private business will usually work with the strongest global economies (ie China). Communists spread their political delusions & propaganda to reduce us to an atheistic global dictatorship & concentration camp for the enitre of humanity.
TheRunica 7 months ago 2
@vids4dan Nonsense! Hitler introduced to Germany Job Security, Social Security, Socialized Education, Health Care, Government redistribution of Wealth and control of economy, Subsidized housing, government price control, wage control, subsidized “transportation for the people” (Volkswagen) and even subsidized recreation (Kraft Durch Freude). You can’t get more socialist than that.
ssmusic214 7 months ago
Often ppl think capitalism is very bad, especially now with the current crisis. And they have a point if u look at labour conditions in 3rd world countries. But communism as a alternative is much worse. Many ppl don't realise.
dekippiesip 8 months ago 2
@dekippiesip The current crisis is caused in the same way as all other recessions/depressions. It's due to fractional reserve banking activities directed by a central bank. Labor conditions in 3rd world countries are due to poverty, and the onlyway to solve poverty is increased savings driving capital investment activities. The only conclusion we get from this is we need MORE CAPITALISM.
truevoice08 8 months ago
In 1957, Soviet authorities admitted 20 to 40 million overall had died since the October “revolution” of 1917 (more like a Jewish coup d’etat). Alexander Solzhenitzyn said his demographic source in the Kremlin pegged the number at 66 million dead from Communism.
Also, according to Solzhenitzyn, at least 60% of the Cheka/NKVD/KGB were Jews.
11pinrelay 8 months ago
lol, at all the butthurt communists disliking this video. What a joke.
PoetsLight 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and for the record-the only good nazi is a dead one.
vengencefrom1979 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and for the record, the only good nazi is a dead one.
vengencefrom1979 9 months ago
so far in re to the millions claimed to have ben killed by commies all i've seen is hearsay and projections. the 11 million people that went missing during wwii (6 million jews and 5 million dissidents) are documented and recorded in history, which occured during the 1950's when a census was taken. all in all it looks like more lying propaganda crap from the neo-con-nazis than anything else when they refer to the 'millions' killed by commies.
vengencefrom1979 9 months ago
@vengencefrom1979 "When Israeli historians Yehuda Bauer and Yisrael Gutman challenged Wiesenthal on this point, he admitted that he had invented the figure of eleven million victims in order to stimulate interest in the Holocaust among non-Jews."
And that 6mio figure is longtime dead. Everyone having watched "onethirdofaholocaust" or "buchenwald- a dumb dumb portrayal of evil" breaks out in laughter over your comment. Now piss-off commie scum.
TheNonConformative 9 months ago
So much for the "Nazis were right wing" argument.
muzzster1970 9 months ago
@muzzster1970
They were Right wing you idiot.
MrReco12 9 months ago
@muzzster1970 Hitler told his Nazi youth that by the time they were running Germany that there would be no social classes. That is also a major aspect of Commuism. Not a very Right wing thing is it?
willmickel71 8 months ago 29
Not true.
Hitler fought off Jewish Bolshevik Communism.
Communism is a transfer of wealth FROM Gentile Christians TO J*Ws.
For $20 Million investement, Russia was looted of Billions in wealth and 66 million Christians were killed by them.
Hitler worked to fight against this, and racial inbreeding, which is against GOD and against nature.
But Hilter was a patsy, they have planned this for 2000 years and Hitler and Germany fought a war that was too moral and kind.
StSimonMartyr 8 months ago
@willmickel71
Their were social classes you ignorant fools!
MrReco12 8 months ago
@willmickel71 that funny considering that the nazi youth and the communist youth would kill eachother in germany. why the capitalist dogs would fund Hitler party
Unitedworkernation 7 months ago
@Unitedworkernation Its obvious you wont believ that what a just wrote so grab a book or go to the wikipedia and learn more about poland. Democracy, freedom of all people, racial and religious freedom. These things were being born in mainly such countries like United States, France, Ancient Greece and Poland. First election of kings in europe was in poland and for the rest of european monarchies it was a sick and insane idea. Marx hated poles because they loved democracy and freedom... true fact
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago
@PolishWingedHussar10 yeah most of the people who started freedom in France were socialist if you didnt know marx consider the french revolution and the french comunes that came after it marxist
"freedom is the road to socialism" Karl Marx
Unitedworkernation 7 months ago
@Unitedworkernation Yes all the aspects in the Marxism was perfectly executed in french revolution, the massive war of clasess resulted in massive bloodshed of thousand of people were murdered or even "massacred". All the roads which led to the french democracy was soaked red in blood of thousands so you are very right. Enitire upper clasess were beheaded by crowds full of vengance and hatred
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago
@Unitedworkernation But dont you dare even compare french to the poles . French succeded democracy in massive bloodshed and murder, poles in the great need for reforms took steps to gain democracy and freedom in peace and with calm. Offcourse there were some people who strongly opposed it but they simply were convince of ideas of freedom. Polish King said 'If poland wont reform, it wil erase itself' and achieved freedom of all, unfortunatly neighbours hated these ideas and took up drastic steps
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago
@willmickel71
Their were social classes in Nazi Germany you idiot, their where millionaires such as Albert Krupp and Fredrick Flick and poor people such as factory workers who had no right to strike or complain about their wealth employers.
Hitler made German Jews, homosexuals, communists second class citizens.
MrReco12 6 months ago
@MrReco12 In reality there is no such thing as a classless society. The soviet union had social classes they had corporations and workers were paid wages. Workers in the Soviet Union were not allowed to strike or complain as well. If you have ever heard of the solidarity movement you would know this fact. However, Hitler said that there would be no social classes in 'Triumph of the Will " . Communists make the same claim but it never becames true. Utopian societies are for the true idiots!!!
willmickel71 6 months ago
@willmickel71
Communists were interested in "class warfare" which is the complete opposite of what you claim.
MrReco12 6 months ago
@MrReco12 Theory does not always translate well to reality.
willmickel71 6 months ago 4
@willmickel71 Not at all. There is such thing as building legitimacy and socialism was apowerful movemetn in Germany. How else can you win over a populace with a ruling class controlled government by making empty promises of classlessness and new beginnings?
Tougemaster06 6 months ago
@Tougemaster06 Fascism is not Left Wing.
Tougemaster06 6 months ago
@Tougemaster06 The truth is that the concept of socialism did not originate from the "proletarian mind." No proletarian or son of a proletarian contributed any substantial idea to the socialist ideology. The intellectual fathers of socialism were members of the intelligentsia, scions of the "bourgeoisie." Ludwig von Mises
willmickel71 6 months ago 2
@willmickel71 Jesus was a bourgeoisie? lol
Tougemaster06 6 months ago
@Tougemaster06 A self employed carpenter who owns his own tools, works his own hours and sets his own prices is call a capitalist.
willmickel71 5 months ago
@willmickel71 No. That is a worker. A capitalist is someone who owns the means of production and is apart of the ruling class of society. A self employed carpenter didn't a $878 Billion dollar bailout...
Tougemaster06 5 months ago
@Tougemaster06 A capitalist is someone who owns the means of production. However the vast majority of people that own businesses do not belong to some elite ruling class. A self employed person by definition owns his own means of production. Self employment means you are both owner and worker. If someone made candles out of their home then sold them on the internet. That person is a Capitalist. If someone grows produce in their back yard and sells it for money. That person is a Capitalist.
willmickel71 5 months ago
@willmickel71 Wrong. Small business owner is a petty-bourgeoise, or petty capitalist. Capitalist do not work. Small business owners still work in their businesses. Thus, they do not qualify as capitalist. They do however have a false capitalist conscious and think of themselves as rich people even though they are two steps away from being unemployed like normal workers. Marx viewed them as counterrevolutionary because they would hold down working people to defend their privileged position.
Tougemaster06 5 months ago
@willmickel71 It would help if you actually learned what Marxist theory is and not what your conservative professor or Fox News tells you.
Tougemaster06 5 months ago
@Tougemaster06 Understanding Marxism and seeing the world from that narrow dogmatic view are very different. I don't take any ideology simply at face value. Before accepting Marxism you might want to play devil's advocate and look how it would exist in practical teams not just fantasy.
willmickel71 5 months ago
@willmickel71 What is practical about Stalinism? Stalinism was a doctrine of governance and foreign policy. It wasn't ideological nor theoretical. The 20th century Communist states were totalitarian because they were forced to comply with Stalinist policies through the Comintern (The Communist bloc's version of the Washington Concensus).
Tougemaster06 5 months ago
@Tougemaster06 You didn't actually believe that the state was going to "wither away" did you?
willmickel71 5 months ago
@willmickel71 Nope and neither did Marx. Marx said the say MAY wither away. He never said it affirmatively would.
Tougemaster06 5 months ago
@Tougemaster06 state*
Tougemaster06 5 months ago
@Tougemaster06 Actually he said WOULD not MAY.
"The State would wither away as a result of victorious Socialism"
willmickel71 5 months ago
@willmickel71 Hitlers promises and what he lead people to believe has nothing to do with what his party actually were. A dictatorship is as far from Marxism as you can get.
elco9791 5 months ago
@elco9791 Yet Maxism produced some of the worst dictators in world history. Mao Ze-Dong, Josef Stalin, Kim Il Sung, Pol Pot , Fidel Castro, Vladimir Lenin, Ho Chi Min, Kim Jong-il all were dictators. A logical conclusion would have to suggest that Maxism is itself fundamentally flawed. It is not possible to argue that each individual should sacrifice for the whole of society, and yet expect each individual to know what "society's good" consists of, without having a dictator to tell them.
willmickel71 5 months ago 12
@willmickel71 Hitler made the working class very very poor, didnt nationalise any institutions, and under the war several private owners got rich from producing. Not very left winged is it?
gulbirk 3 months ago
@gulbirk The Nazi regime had dictatorship powers over the German economy. They Nationalised health care, the automobile industry, the construction industry, the Railway industry and agriculture. Very left wing indeed.
willmickel71 3 months ago
@willmickel71 It was a dictatorship now too? LOL.
It wasnt nationalised. it was banned from being owned by anyone non german.
""They nationalised health care"" there were lots of private hospitals. All of these other construction things were nationalised BECAUSE it was war time. It wasnt a strategic build up.
Besides, the rich still got richer because there were owners. For crying out loud, several owners of construction companies who contstructed military devices became rich.
gulbirk 3 months ago
@gulbirk "Most cruel joke of all, however, has been played by Hitler & Co. on those German capitalists and small businessmen who once backed National Socialism as a means of saving Germany's bourgeois economic structure from radicalism. The Nazi credo that the individual belongs to the state also applies to business. Some businesses have been confiscated outright, on other what amounts to a capital tax has been levied. Profits have been strictly controlled.
willmickel71 3 months ago
@gulbirk Some idea of the increasing Governmental control and interference in business could be deduced from the fact that 80% of all building and 50% of all industrial orders in Germany originated last year with the Government. Hard-pressed for food- stuffs as well as funds, the Nazi regime has taken over large estates and in many instances collectivized agriculture, a procedure fundamentally similar to Russian Communism." Time Magazine Jan 2, 1939
willmickel71 3 months ago
@willmickel71 Actually, its not similar at all. Russia had communism. So they lived by that. NAZI germany taxes high to get money for warfare and instrastructure (though allot of companies producing materials used in warfare were private. I dont see the NAZI`s nationalising these businesses, only restricting them. Also, there was not an increase in welfare either, so I dont know how much of a left state it really was.
gulbirk 3 months ago
@gulbirk It is ironic that you would mention the Soviet Union. The most militaristic society of the 20th century. In the Soviet Union working class pay and working conditions were the worst of any industrial nation. The same harsh working conditions could be found in Mao's China. I don't think I even need to bring up North Korea. Workers paradise my ass!!
willmickel71 3 months ago 3
@willmickel71 I brought it up. I never defended it. As for working conditions, they mainly turned bad with Stalin, thought they were far from perfect under lenin.
But they never lacked anything under Lenin, which is why its a left winged society. You wouldnt die of hunger because you didnt have money. You wouldnt end up on street. The security was very good. The security didnt EXIST in Nazi germany. Almost nothing was spent at creating a socialist society. Not a mark.
gulbirk 3 months ago
Comment removed
willmickel71 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gulbirk You would die of hunger because the Communist government would cut off food supplies and starve you to death. You wouldn't be on the streets because you would go to a labor camp or a concentration camp. An idea the Nazis stole from the Communists. The only people who had security were the elites who ran the government. Most people lived in fear.
willmickel71 3 months ago
@willmickel71 Yes, and thats why over 50% of russias population want it back.
gulbirk 3 months ago
@gulbirk If thats the case then why don't they vote for it? Communists in Russia today make about 10-15% of voters in Russia.
willmickel71 3 months ago
@gulbirk
"But they never lacked anything under Lenin"
Except, y'know, food, property and basic human rights.
NiceGuyCody 2 months ago
@NiceGuyCody BULLSHIT. Provide sources to back that up if that is not bullshit. I had relatives who actually visisted the USSR. Surprisingly enough, allot of people were not only filled, but fat. Housing was a right. The number of people living on the street is lower then in many western countries today. Life expectensy went through the ROOF after they took over, and it went down when the USSR collapses.
gulbirk 2 months ago
@willmickel71
Rubbish, the Nazis privatized large sectors of the economy, anti communist, took healthcare away from Jews, gypsies etc.
MrReco12 2 months ago
@MrReco12 Sabbath Jews and Gypsies were treated like scum in the Soviet Union. No privatization ever took place in Nazi Germany.
willmickel71 1 month ago
@willmickel71
" the government of the National Socialist Party sold off public ownership in several state-owned firms in the middle of the 1930s. The firms belonged to a wide range of sectors: steel, mining, banking, local public utilities, shipyard, ship-lines, railways, etc. In addition to this, delivery of some public services produced by public administrations prior to the 1930s, especially social services and services related to work, was transferred to the private sector"
MrReco12 1 month ago
@MrReco12 Reimann quotes from a businessman's letter: "You have no idea how far state control goes and how much power the Nazi representatives have over our work. The worst of it is that they are so ignorant. These Nazi radicals think of nothing except 'distributing the wealth.' Some businessmen have even started studying Marxist theories, so that they will have a better understanding of the present economic system.
The Vampire Economy by Guenter Reimann
willmickel71 1 month ago
@willmickel71
"Because of the rivalries between the many political parties in Germany and the general disorder there was no opportunity for prosperity. ... We thought that Hitler would give us such a healthy environment. Indeed he did do that."
-Alfried Krupp: Billionaire businessman(Nazi supporter).
MrReco12 1 month ago
@MrReco12 While state representatives are busily engaged in investigating and interfering, our agents and salesmen are handicapped because they never know whether or not a sale at a higher price will mean denunciation as a 'profiteer' or 'saboteur,' followed by a prison sentence. You cannot imagine how taxation has increased. Yet everyone is afraid to complain. Everyone has his doubts about the system, unless he is very young, very stupid, or is bound to it by the privileges he enjoys
willmickel71 1 month ago
@willmickel71 "There are terrible times coming. If only I had succeeded in smuggling out $10,000 or even $5,000, I would leave Germany with my family. Business friends of mine are convinced that it will be the turn of the 'white Jews' (which means us, Aryan businessmen) after the Jews have been expropriated. The difference between this and the Russian system is much less than you think, despite the fact that we are still independent businessmen."
willmickel71 1 month ago
@willmickel71
Source: Against the Mainstream: Nazi Privatization in 1930s Germany, by Germa Bel:
Jews served as ministers in the soviet government and gypsies set up theaters and cultural life in the USSR(especially after 1956).
MrReco12 1 month ago
@MrReco12 "every Jew is a potential spy." "the good workers at the factory should be given clubs so they can beat the hell out of those Jews."
Joseph Stalin
willmickel71 1 month ago
@willmickel71
watch?v=rj7iRwzX-A0
Stalin's dislike of Jews was linked to his like of Jewish Trotsky.
Google Lazar Kagnovich: Anti Semites love him because he validates their "Jewish-Bolshevik" conspiracy.
MrReco12 1 month ago
@MrReco12 There is a bit of a difference in the ant-semitism of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. To be a Sabbath Jew, meaning one who keeps with the Sabbath, celebrating Hanukkah, Passover or going to synagogue were not acceptable in Communist communist society. Nor could one be a party member for doing so. The Nazis made no distinction between a Sabbath or Secular Jew.
I believe Stalin had Trotsky killed in Mexico long after events like "The Night of the Murdered Poets".
willmickel71 1 month ago
@willmickel71 Long Before "The Night of the Murdered Poets".
willmickel71 1 month ago
@willmickel71
"state atheism" was the official policy of the soviet union and they closed down quite a few religious buildings. However, in the fascist states(Germany, Italy, Spain) synagogues were closed while catholic and protestant churches were allowed to remain open.
MrReco12 1 month ago
@MrReco12 Synagogues in Spain and Italy remained open. Franco and Mussolini were evil dictators but did not share Hitlers hate of Jews. Spain was a safe haven for all Jewish refugees and antisemitism was not official policy under the Franco regime. Jew were also members of Mussollini's Fascist party for almost 20 years until 1938 when Hitler demanded they be removed from the party.
willmickel71 1 month ago
@willmickel71 The Church and fascism could never have a lasting connection because both are a "holistic Weltanschauung" claiming the whole of the person. h Hitler and Mussolini were anticlerical, they both understood that it would be rash to begin their "Kulturkampfs" prematurely, such a clash, possibly inevitable in the future, were put off while they dealt with other enemies
willmickel71 1 month ago
Soviets = Nazis!!!
Stalin = Hitler!!!
temax1992 10 months ago
@temax1992 Well I wouldn't say that, the original soviets were good, but stalin was an evil man, he ruined the name of soviets.
iwannabethekid34x 10 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x Vladimir Lenin killed about around 30,000 dissidents between the years of 1917-1920. He was involved in the creation of the bolshevik "vanguard" party and it was said that since its sole purpose was to protect and defend the people or "proletariat", one could not legitimately question or criticize the bolsheviks. Thus, from this Stallin was merely using this x10, or exploiting it further. (cont.)
Fr33Gangsta3 9 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x Lenin was responsible for the deaths of around about 30,000 dissidents between the years of 1917-1920. He was involved in the creation of the bolshevik "vanguard" party, in which it was said that since its sole purpose was to protect and defend the people or "proletariat", one could not legitimately criticize the bolsheviks. Thus, Stallin was merely using this principle on steroids, or as I would like to say, he was exploiting a loophole in Marxist-Leninist theory. (cont.)
Fr33Gangsta3 9 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x Lenin was responsible for the deaths of around about 30,000 dissidents between the years of 1917-1920. He was involved in the creation of the Bolshevik "vanguard" party, in which it was said that since its sole purpose was to protect and defend the people or "proletariat", one could not legitimately criticize the Bolsheviks. Thus, Stallin was merely using this principle on steroids, or as I would like to say, he was exploiting a loophole in Marxist-Leninist theory. (cont.)
Fr33Gangsta3 9 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@iwannabethekid34x Lenin was responsible for the deaths of around about 30,000 dissidents between the years of 1917-1920. He was involved in the creation of the Bolshevik "vanguard" party, in which it was said that since its sole purpose was to protect and defend the people or "proletariat", one could not legitimately criticize the Bolsheviks. Thus, Stallin was merely using this principle on steroids, or as I would like to say, he was exploiting a loophole in Marxist-Leninist theory. (cont.)
Fr33Gangsta3 9 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x sorry something Fd up with YT and this happend
Fr33Gangsta3 9 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x (cont.) and just to show you the hypocracy of the 1918 R.S.F.S. constitution, it states:
Article Ch.13 sect. 64. The right to vote and to be elected to the soviets is enjoyed by the following citizens of both sexes, irrespective of religion, nationality, domicile, etc., yet it goes on to say that (d) Monks and clergy of all denominations aren't even allowed to vote even if they work& are productive but at Article 2 Ch. 5 Sect. 18. (cont.)
Fr33Gangsta3 9 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x (cont.) 18. The Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic considers work the duty of every citizen of the Republic, and proclaims as its motto: 'He shall not eat who does not work.'
This quote is biblical scripture, so in other words... "ummm yeah the bible is right but we're deffinately not going to follow it... ok, ok, exept for this part but we're atheists...oh and church leaders, tho you speak truth, you can't vote... or face Gulag!!!
Fr33Gangsta3 9 months ago
@Fr33Gangsta3 I like original communism soviet republic, you have to work to eat....so why complain? GET WORKING BOI.
iwannabethekid34x 9 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x lol, thats not the point tho. oh well im done commenting on this video C U LATER YALL!!!
Fr33Gangsta3 9 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x You will complain when Government will unilaterally decide how much you work and eat.
And than government will kill you for complaining.
ssmusic214 9 months ago 25
@ssmusic214 How would they control how much I eat? Thats not Communism, that right there is stalinism. Look at the aspects for once.
iwannabethekid34x 9 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x Halloooooo....... When the government controls how much you are paid and how much you pay for food and which store you are allowed to shop.....
And Stalinism is the ONLY reality under communist rule. Any other is just a fantasy.
ssmusic214 9 months ago 2
@ssmusic214 Communism, socialism, liberalism founded by the "jews". Historical fact: Marx, Lenin, and Trotsky were all "jews". Read proof: THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION. And the "jewish" talmud. Don't take my word for it, read these books. Dean Berry Ministries
HDEANBERRYDOTCOM 7 months ago
@HDEANBERRYDOTCOM "PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION" is fake hoax created in Russia in 1910"s . The myth that was actually plagiarized from a 19th century French political satire in which the alleged plotters weren’t even Jewish.
And there weren't any jews in Chinese Communist party of 20 000 000+. More than twice the size of CPSU.
ssmusic214 7 months ago
@temax1992
what about Bush and Reagan in Nicaragua and Panama? yankis= nazis=Bush/Reagan
arsfilosofo 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@temax1992
what about Bush and Reagan in Nicaragua and Panama? yankis= nazis=Bush/Reagan
arsfilosofo 9 months ago
You fucking commies are no better then these nazies. Maybe youre even worst, because nazis did genocide for 5 years, and you did it for 71 year. Can't believe that there are still idiots you believe in communism. Shit, even Mussolini was ex-commie.
How retarted can you be to say that Pol Pot regime is good, or North Korea regime is good, or chinese. For me, commies are even worst then nazis. But they are children of one and the same people. Youre no better then nazis. Fucking idiots.
samirbalonmano 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano The worst of all are Americans and English, they destroyed millions of peoples and dozens of nation. I think our Lord divided them on purpose from other people by water. Any time you open your mouth to accuse, even Hitler, remember: Indians, Vietnam, Korea, Laos, Kampuchia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama, Grenada, Yougoslavia. Spend more time in the sun, you must adjust at heat while you are living.
tagaphon 10 months ago
@tagaphon Half of those counted country's Russians and commies attacked, or helped the conflict by helping and financing terrorist actions of commies around the world. In all those places commies are as the second side of conflict, and second attacker. In the middle are those people from small country's.
All those the bloodiest regimes from Pol Pot to Castro was directly financed and organized by russians and commies. So you just proved my point.
samirbalonmano 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano Don't try to be more stupid that you are! There is no excuse for Vietnam and Agent Orange, for Yugoslavia, and Afghanistan, and Iraq. The imagined crimes of somebody else is no excuse for crimes. Any murderer must be punished, no matter what he lies.
tagaphon 10 months ago
@tagaphon Yougoslavia was never attacked by Americans, but it was by USSR in 1948. Also it was reported that Red Army raped and pillaged, even worse then Germans did. Also, genocide on small nations is something that Imperial Russia, and later communistic Russia under the mask of socialism did a lot. Soviet had they're indians also, and what happened to them? Same thing as did to american natives, and all others. I'm saying that commies as a third side finances and helped terrorism.
samirbalonmano 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano Are you two years old? 2000 civilian Yugoslavs are dead as result of American bombing. Don't speak about Russian genocide, your forefathers killed every nation on American continent, in New Zealand and many others, while in Russia live all the nations that joined Russia, exactly each one.
tagaphon 10 months ago
@tagaphon That is nothing compared to 6 million famined to death by commies. All nations were joined by force in USSR. You will tell me that Russians didn't killed Hungarians, and Czechs, and Polish in the time after second world war? Same killing and deportation happened to Estonians, Litvanians, Chechens, and all other small nations in soviet russia. So, your forefathers did the same to all nations that were close to Russia. In 1939 commies attacked Poland with nazi's, and KATIN is proof.
samirbalonmano 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano you invent crimes of communism long ago, which nobody can check cuz English internet is censored, so nobody remembers murders you commit every day. Yesterday you killed 9 civilians in Afghanistan, you capitalists admitted that, and I don't know how many you killed really. As well I don't know how many people kills heroin that Karzai produces together with Americans. As known Talibs destroyed and are still destroying puppy fields.
tagaphon 10 months ago
@tagaphon How many did you killed in Chechenia yesterday? You are fucking hypocrites.
samirbalonmano 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano You are murderers, not us. Not a single Russian soldiers in Chechnia. And how many Americans are killing around?
tagaphon 10 months ago
@tagaphon Not a single russian soldier in Chechenia? You are a retarted aren't you?
It's ok to lie to me, but why do you lie to your self? Is Zhirinovski some cousin of yours?
samirbalonmano 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano The Jews, cousins of Zhirinovski, are ruling you. Fuck of from Chechnya topic, you still didn't apologize about Afghanistan and Iraq. As soon you leave all occupied countries, apologize, pay all widows and orphan children compensation, rebuild both countries as they were before you invided, only then you'll get right to speak about human rights elsewhere.
tagaphon 10 months ago
The reason the posters look similar is gobshite Goebbels was uncreative, he copied the propaganda of other countries all the time. He copied American marketing commercials, and he copied the Soviet posters, he just ripped them off. You could show American commercials that looked similar to Nazi propaganda to try and say America is fascist, and it would be equally as stupid. Whoever made this film must've been on some heavy drugs.
thealmightypidgeon 11 months ago
Nazis were like socialists except for the fact that they were nationalist, racist, regarded women as a lesser sex, christian, had rich and poor citizens, selling products for a profit... THAT ISN'T SOCIALIST AT ALL YOU FUCKING RETARDS. Why do you think Marxists went to the same fucking death camps? Read a book, Google it, just get some fucking facts into your head and stop siding with people feeding you the same anti-Marxist propaganda the Nazis used to feed.
thealmightypidgeon 11 months ago
@thealmightypidgeon So when Karl Marx talsk about inferior races that must dissapear in "holocaust", that is not so bad? Socialism is even worst, because of it's sinister abusing of humain ideas for they're purpose.
I truly believe that russian socialism is in fact hidden national-socialism. Just look what have russians done to small country of East Europe under the mask of "social justice". They have deported people and on they're land put Russians. Proof? Litvanian Kaliningrad....
samirbalonmano 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano Socialism is now somehow WORSE than fascism? Nowhere in the book does it say anything about killing any race. The point is to eliminate the upper and ruling classes, not by killing them, only by removing their ability to control others. You can't change someone's race, but you can very easily change their class. They expelled German citizens from Kaliningrad, because Soviets gained that territory from the Nazis, just a normal part of the war pushing to Berlin.
thealmightypidgeon 10 months ago
@thealmightypidgeon My point exactly. If that genocide and etnic cleansing was by classes, then only rich Germans would be deported. But instead under the mask of "justice for all" Russians stole, deported, robbed and killed almost half of Europe for 40 years. Proof for that is bloodbath in Hungary, Czech, Poland, Afghanistan, and later in Chechenia. So, you used class war in race and nation war.
This clip is not talking about BOOK, it talks about newspapers that Karl Marx was leading.
samirbalonmano 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano No, rich Germans would become poor Germans. If they were fascist, they would have killed the German citizens instead of deporting them. That has nothing to do with racism, just the Soviets were not able to force German citizens to become Soviet citizens, as Kaliningrad was at that point a part of the USSR. The rest of your cited events are grossly oversimplified, their agenda was to make the world communist, so they operated to that end. That's what first world governments do.
thealmightypidgeon 10 months ago
@thealmightypidgeon That is what Im saying, Russians took other people's land, and deported and killed other nations for it. "Grossly oversimplified"???? They're agenda was russian national-socialism under the mask of socialism. Even today they do the same. If socialism and national-socialism are not two sides of one same mirror, why is then 50 % of all worlds national-socialists in Russia? Why is then a national-socialist in Duma? Why is then attacking foreigners every day thing in Russia?
samirbalonmano 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano Yes, and the Soviet government that replaced their governments was better. It's called liberation. It was their objective, and it was a just objective until Gorbachev diverted and caused economic collapse. Answer me this, if Christianity and Islam aren't the same thing, why are there muslims in America? See, it's a stupid question and it doesn't make a point. There are some nationalists in Russia, there are nationalists everywhere. It has no bearing on socialism.
thealmightypidgeon 10 months ago
@samirbalonmano In fact by that logic you're calling your own country a Nazi country, every country has neo-Nazis. Russia is a larger country with more people, so they have a few more neo-Nazis as well. You can't honestly think they say "Well the Soviet Union loved Nazism, so I will too!", that doesn't even begin to make sense.
thealmightypidgeon 10 months ago
I realize most people don’t have the time or patience to study 20th century Russian history, but it’s still incredible to see just how gullible people are.
And the simpler "the truth" that is being fed to them, the more likely they are to believe it, which is why the Soviet Story has convinced so many simpletons.
JD12ish 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The full 240p version of this documentary on YT, check our channel --> Playlist "Movies (in full length!)":
tinyurl (dot) com/movies-at-youtube
ausseratem 11 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
«Factor VI -- Cattle: Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.»
-- Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars
Check out the official website for more background information and DVD orders:
sovietstory (dot) com
ausseratem 11 months ago 3
are you fucking kidding me you twat!
You gotta be the most incompetent, loser jerk ever to use Youtube.
Your numbers are so off the chart, so even if you did this to the US they would throw you in jail like the Wiki leaks owner!
You are disgrace!
gaikokujinNor 11 months ago
The truth is that there was never communist as written by Marx and Engels. The "communism" we see around the world was Stalinism.And that ideology was the state(dictator) is supreme and to create a utopian society.They have to get rid of any opposition.Which is common in totalitarian regimes.
jxsilicon9 11 months ago
@jxsilicon9
Then what was the "communism" pushed my Mao, Castro, Pol Pot and so on?
OxAO 11 months ago
@OxAO
Totalitarian regimes based on Stalinism regime that use any means to maintain power.Communist state has never existed and can't exist.Communism is a classless,stateless country.In reality idealism doesn't worked. You need a mixed economy otherwise you won't last. US is learning that the hard way.If a so called communist country wasn't buying up the debt then US would probably go bankrupt.
jxsilicon9 11 months ago
@jxsilicon9
I agree that true communism, capitalism or any of the ism's can not exist in their purist form.
Doesn't mean they didn't try.
OxAO 11 months ago
“Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it; no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it.” - James Madison
OxAO 1 year ago
Marx and his buddy Engles were Jewish scum.
EddieTheDaddyHitler 1 year ago