Added: 2 years ago
From: CBS
Views: 5,413
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Haha. I believe this question has been answered. Sanchez sucks

  • Everyone hates on Sanchez because he plays in New York, along Rex Ryan. You can't say Sanchez is a bad QB. Look what he's done in the post season two years a row. Would Stafford do better than Sanchez if he were a Jet? You'd never know because he's so easily injured, and that's a huge thing in football.

  • The IDEA of stafford was good, but when you have a bad O-line he cant run and is constantly rushed. not to mention that anybody on the Lions will suck....

  • kinda like a peyton manning vs ryan leaf kinda choice

  • @xxcowsxx what??

  • @maxypooh15 you really replied on a comment i posted 8 months ago????? get a fucking life dude

  • wow, these guys are a bunch of fucking morons, matt stafford is so much better, he reads defenses better, has better arm strength, and his accuracy is on par with sanchez if not better, on a team with no offensive line, he deserves alot more credit then he deserves.

  • @chickenshit72 ya but sanchez and the jets have made it to the afc championship both years he has been there and has a chance to go to the superbowl this year. while stafford hasnt made it to the playoffs yet.

  • @Jmf8337 wanna know why? sanchez has a WAY better team. he has one of the leagues best defenses, one of the best running games, and the best offensive line in the league. while stafford has one of the worst offensive lines, a mediocre running game, good receivers and a horrible defense. If they traded spots then Stafford would've taken the jets to the super bowl both years, and made the pro bowl both years.

  • when stafford is healthy,,,stafford all the why!

  • who's the ass?

  • Phil lookin like an ass right about now. But, in all fairness it's still early.

  • I hate how people talk like Sanchez led the jets' charge into the plahyoffs or something. Sanchez had a LOT more help that Stafford did last year, and even this season. My question, if Sanchez is better, why'd he have the QB light system Ryan hooked him up with? Stafford had no coach given limitations

  • @NFLFan6 Uh, Sanchez had a hell of a lot better supporting cast

  • I respect Simms...but theres no doubt that Stafford has the physical tools hands down. Not to mention...Matt is mentally tough and sound, he'll get it right with the correct players around him.

  • A lot of the things people are saying are true but I also want to add that Sanchez has a really strong support staff. People have taken a bigger risk with putting so much trust in him and allowing him to start so soon. Detroit's main problem was that they were looking for an immediate fix to their problems and the jets risked having a bad year to develop a QB. In the end this will make Sanchez better because more people will have a more stable trust in him. Does that make sense?

  • its simple stafford is more talented and sanchez has a better team. both will have success

  • Sanchez is gonna be better than stafford for many reasons 1. he has more weapons in the jets than stafford does in the lions 2. he has great acuracy wich stafford doesnt although staford has a big gun he doesnt have as much accuracy as sanchez and 3. Sanchez has a much better O line instead of stafford has one of the worst in the country,

  • u forgot to put down mobility , Detroit is going to regret it or they already are .

  • Sanchez is better. Stafford is good. Stafford has Calvin Johnson, Sanchez has jericho but he isnt good as calvin johnson. Jets o line is better. Sanchez will take the jets to the playoffs faster than stafford

  • lions will prove all the team that there better. stafford better then san

  • sanchez is set up for more success. the jets got a defense, o line and a runing game unlike the lions.

  • Lions fans are such tools...lol. Is there any such thing as a Lions fan?

    If I were a Lions fan, I'd stick my testicles in a fan so I couldn't infect the rest of the world

  • Raiders fans are the worst.

  • Every Ex QB says Mark is better every scout who never played in the nfl (Tod mcSheay and Mel Kiper) says Stafford

  • uhh Check out what Aikman, Montana, Tarkenton, and Elway said all said Stafford will do better

  • @dawgfan34247 add bradshaw to that list too

  • and whos doing better ? mark sanchez without a doubt . right on bro

  • Matthew Stafford will be a stud in the NFL. Sanchez will be a dud of a bust. Sanchez is an overzealous kid who wants the keys to a franchise that he will end up wrecking. The Jets have to answer and pay for the sins they commited against Eric Mangini ! What does Sanchez's footwork in a workout have to do with a real NFL game. There was a guy who had good footwork and played in the NFL, his name was Mike Vick. How did that turn out? Hmmmm...

  • LOL. The fact that you would even compare Sanchez to Vick makes me not take a thing you say seriously. They are COMPLETELY different QBs.

  • lmfaooo, ur a dumbass, mick vick doesnt have good footwork u idiot, he has speed, the footwork there talkin bbout with sanchez is that he can move out of the pocket adn make a pass, an the sins the jets committed agaisnt mangini??? please lsit those sins, lolololol

  • isnt phil simms an nfl analyst?

  • LOL Sanchez is so bad. He shouldn't have even went in the 1st round. Stafford went early too, prob a mid 1st selection, but MUCH better than Sanchez

  • Get a clue about football then you can talk

  • Way to prove your point LOL

  • I don't have to prove my point to a moron

  • Sanchez had better recievers, a better offensive line, the best defense in college football, and he played in a weak division.

    Stafford's O Line was ranked among the worst in the Sec, which is the toughest conference in football. You FAIL you retard LOLOLOLOLOLOL

  • and who do u think should be the 1st pick?

  • Aaron Curry, but well never know until we see Stafford and Sanchez pplay.

  • LOL. Yeah, ill take some nobodys opinion over Phil Simms, who gets paid damn good money to do this.

    Sanchez > Stafford. Book it.

  • We'll never really know which QB is better till they play. Sanchez is in a much better position on the Jets.

    So, you only believe a person is right if they get paid for their opinion? LOLOL

  • Not necessarily, but you go in saying Sanchez sucks giving no legitimate reason. You just say he sucks. So please tell me why anyone would want your opinion over people who actually ANALYZE his gameplay? And please dont spew me that "hes only played 16 games zomg!" argument.

  • Ok, he's only started 16 games in a very weak conference and was surrounded by all stars and had a great defense.

    Sanchez = Ryan Leaf reborn except Leaf was better

  • @enjoisk8er667 Bradshaw [who gets paid to do the same thing as simms] said Stafford as well as Elway, Aikman etc.

  • these guys are jokes

  • It's a good thing that these guys aren't NFL analysts...Phil Simms is washed up.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more