Statistics in the basis of psi-experiments should only be used when probabilities usually games of chance such as Zener Cards, dice, etc. come into play.Using statistics in psi-wheel experiments is impossible because you cannot calculate the P-value of a psi-wheel.
Besides, why bother statistics since the evidence in psi-wheel experiments are self-evident, i.e. either happens or doesn't?
@Dada1Tube Isn't it baffling how people like you are quick to draw out of prejudices without even bothering to bring the evidence to the table? If skeptics were like you, Carl Sagan, the man who advocated healthy skepticism would be rolling in his grave...
For your information and education, vibrations doesn't cause the psi-wheel to spin, it actually wobbles. Don't believe me? Create a psi-wheel, leave it on a table, hammer the ground with your feet and watch that sucker wobble...
@LaughingStock71 Sorry but your psi-wheel=Crooke's Radiometer theory is completely incorrect. I have tested that theory many times under a bright light and my hand nearby and it did not made a single movement whatsoever, despite the fact of its really low friction...
@IceAges14Aces What do you mean by "my theory"? Maybe you got me wrong. I have cited construction features of the radiometer and made clear that that the PSI wheel has completely different features. Hence, PSI wheel DIFFERENT FROM Radiometer. Just to make this clear to all those people out there who claim PSI wheels are just radiometers. It's complete nonsense!
The radiometer is made from a glass bulb from which much of the air has been removed to form a partial vacuum. [...] The effect begins to be seen at partial vacuum pressures of a few torr (several hundred pascals)
"""
For comparison, the PSI wheel here rotates under normal conditions, which is about 100,000 Pascal! Another crucial feature of a Radiometer:
"""
The vanes are polished or white on one side, black on the other.
ok to put a end to this bs.. first off small vibrations on the table such as that laptop computer is causeing the wheel to move.. and above all that bowl might look flush but there is nano bits of air comeing throuwhere the bowl meets the table
@Dada1Tube Small vibrations on the table, eh? Did you test that? No? But you believe it anyway, without testing? Yes. Oh, how very scientific. I, on the other hand, have tested this, and other conventional explanations, and I've made videos about them all. But you didn't bother to look before stating completely untenable explanations.
@Dada1Tube Yeah, you finally got the trick! Unfortunately, it turns out that it only moves that smooth and continuously with /Good/ Vibrations, as those produced by the lovely ghosts living in Darryl's house. Otherwise, it will just shake randomly up and down, and forth and back, or simply shivering - which is the reason why you haven't manage it yet to do the same at your own home. ;-)
once i had connected with a pen i was staring on in a library and then i started rotating it counter clockwise and then clockwise till i pushed it on the other side of the table and realised my freinds staring at me as if i am a ghost
@Peetree777 Sorry, no. I didn't go the bookshop route with this. Online ordering only, via the website link on my main channel page. Or, if you search for my name on eBay, you can do it that way. Thanks for your interest.
I've been using your techniques for about three days now with and without a bowl. I've not had much luck with the bowl on but without it it's definitely moved. I'm glad you told me about moving your hands to communicate with your subconscious. I'll try that next and see if I can get it to spin. I might also try using binoculars to make certain my breath isn't moving it.
my first day trying it was when i was ten. i was afraid when it happend. i willed the air fan to go on and it did, at the same time the window slamed open and i mean slamed. i recently have come to the undertanding that it i a gift given to me buy God from birth t ha alway been within me. Cool....
listen i could believe it.. but this is again not true.. only thing that is considered superstitious by science but is actually true is Astrology.
Why does whatever kinesis has to be so dramatic.. putting your open hands in front of it.. shaking them.. like you re feeling some energy.. i would more rather believe it if some winked and made the thing move !
I have tried heating the bowl in the microwave to see if that made the psi wheel spin i also tried putting psi wheel on to a warm surface like where a hot drink had been resting to see if that made it spin both didn't work. I can't yet make it spin threw the bowl but the day is near. Your vids are great don't be phased by the skeptics that don't put there theories to the test before guessing how its done
Hi Darryl, I haven't actually watched this particular video of yours, yet. Generally speaking, you don't seem like you are satisfied with your progress rate. May I ask how much time -averagely- have you been spending during your practises? (i.e.: 4 days a week, 1 hour each time)
Next try it in an actual sealed container, not this one that isn't at all airtight against the table. How about putting the bowl upside down in a dish of water, so the edge is submerged and you can't blow into it?
And how about moving something that isn't easily affected by air currents like the convection you'd get from holding a heat source (your hand) next to one side of the container?
@keroncoward PK involves projecting energy from within yourself outward. When you say it's the brain, are you presuming that this is done without some form of energy transfer, in defiance of the laws of physics? Because that's not my take on this at all. The hand is a convenient conduit.
@darrylsloan but why do you have to be so close? why not use your hand as a convenient conduit from far away? Glass conducts heat pretty easily, doesn't it? I'm not usually a skeptic, but I'm sorry, I don't see anything but the transfer of heat energy.
@skyskape411 You suggested an alternative explanation (heat penetrating the glass) and you immediately believed it without even testing whether it's viable. How is that skepticism? (You need to see my other videos on this, because I've done this test and many more.)
@darrylsloan I have watched the other videos (yours and others) and they have changed my opinion for sure. But please don't suggest that one needs to test everything before being able to raise a valid doubt. Heat transfer just seems more logical than telekinesis based what I've been taught, that's all. I now see that it may not be the answer. Thanks!
@keroncoward I'm convinced, neuro scientists would get very upset, if someone would seriously claim that the brain is able to do telekinesis, that is, remotely affecting items without any direct physical connection. I guess, they would rather answer, it must somehow be due to using the hand. ;-)
The feeling is verry hard to explain but it is obvious. Sometimes it's almost like a mild muscle fever in your brain, not a headache mind you but a specific feeling that you don't get by doing anything else. Practice enough and you will get the hang of it. Advice: do NOT force it to move, rather "let it move" or will it to move but not forcefully. If you try to force. almost all your concentration goes into the act of forcing or straining yourself and none in the act itself.
@sirusownslinkmania How can I train. I will do anything and I am almost completely dedicated to learning. Even if I don't succeed in making it actually move, it will still be a very nice experience. Please PM me any type of advice and instructions, make it as long as you want I want to learn as much as I can but I cant find any type of tutorials online on what I need to accomplish!
@mmlrl25 and how exactly is THAT possible? PSI balls don't seem as realistic as spinning PSI wheels. I mean, I'm not one to judge as I haven't actually witnessed one being made or made one myself but seriously, a SOLID ball out off energy from the earth. Please. explain!
@darrylsloan This is bullcrap and defies the laws of physics. To put something in motion, you have to have some sort of energy like pushing or pulling or picking up something. With your brain, there is no energy. It just programs the body, how can you pick up something with your mind? There is no energy doing this...
@malikc6 If it were not energy based, it would be bullcrap. Nobody's claiming this is supernatural, just currently unexplained. There does seem to be a mechanism for transferring energy from the body to outside the body. Don't waste your time calling me liar. I'm not interested in your belief or non-belief. Either investigate or don't. Up to you.
In a computer RPG you merely press a button and your wizard guy or whatever can cast a spell. What if in our universe we can similarly key into the right combination and produce an effect? Isn't that consistent with the universe being a gigantic program. Input and output.
Maybe the right mental state is just very hard to find. Are you then saying it happens by happenstance according to the right energy which may be "floating around" so to speak? How does that account for repeatability? And also that not all people can tap into the same similarity space? I thought before you said anyone can do this (though its been a while, so I'm not entirely sure that's what you said).
@MetaphysicalShadows Not happenstance. Psi phenomena have their basis in the ability of the mind to communicate with a deep part of the unconscious mind. This is what accounts for its unpredictability. It is done by something beyond conscious thought - a deeper part of you. This is what accounts for its slippperiess. It is like temporarily breaking the natural working of the mind. At best, there is a partial repeatability that is scientifically valid only under statistics.
@darrylsloan Erm, I am reading this discussion about "statistic relevance" quite often. And it is probably a relevant aspect of experiments like were one has to manipulate the outcome of a random generator. But for the PSI wheel, I don't see where statistics comes into play. If it moves smoothly and continuously in the same direction for 20 seconds when the conditions are such that it's impossible to move that way, then TK has been proven just as for any other mechanical phenomenon.
@darrylsloan Reasonable comment on a general level, and certainly true for stuff like "reading the aura", where there is no real way to come up with a proper measurement theory or to make scientific experiments for either finding clear evidence or to falsify. But PSI wheel spinning behaves just like a traditional physics experiment, just that there is a human in the loop - so just like a mixture of a physical and a psychological experiment. And you succeed to spin it regularly, no?
@darrylsloan To be honest, I think its possible. I just get really frustrated that this isnt proven but yet people claim to do it and I cant. Who knows, maybe we can somehow take energy within our body and release it.
@malikc6 It does not defy anything.The current "laws of physics" are valid for the physical world only. But when including the multidimensional reality and the MIND, things change. The brain only programs the body? Well that statement makes the rest of your comment pretty much redundant. Before spewing out textual vomit and preconcieved beliefs try doing some research or actual experimentation for once instead of taking for granted these "laws of physics" of yours.
@malikc6 That assumption is as pathetic as your understanding of life. If you keep looking at it from a 3D perspective then you won't go to far in your wisdom. A force clearly affects the object but we can only speculate of its origin and nature. As I said do your own experiments and then draw a conclusion. Believe what you will, it's your loss anyways
@malikc6 Make a psi wheel which is the starting point of this skill, then place your awareness on the object, be aware of its shape and size in space and try to feel it as if it were a part of you. Have an open mind and do not start this with failiure in your mind. Try to realize that it actually is possible but more than that, YOU can do it. Next try to feel and see it move in the directon you want. Always remember that it is your mind that limits you, for you can do anything.
@sirusownslinkmania Let me ask you something. If its real, why is it still unanswered? What energy is doing this? Like I said, the laws of physics states that there has to be energy doing moving the object. I just wanna know what it is before I attempt this feat.
@malikc6 As I said we can only speculate of the nature and origin of this force. But it may be that brainwaves if focused and with enough power can ineract with this force and create an effect. Or perhaps conert it into kinetic energy.
@sirusownslinkmania By "brainwaves", do you mean what gets measured by an EEG? Do you have a clue what the result would be to an EEG measurement, if the brainwaves would be so strong that they can move a PSI wheel from a distance of >50cm?
@LaughingStock71 It is just an assumption. I don't think it has ever been atempted to monitor the brainwaves of a person doing telekinesis. This is because no one believes it and it is subject to ridicule. But those open enough to experiment know the truth. I do not think it is a matter of how strong the brainwaves are but of how much are they focused.
@sirusownslinkmania You can read in the Wikipedia article on "Electroencephalography" that the voltage at the electrodes of an EEG is at most 100 microVolt. So, I guess, you can focus as much as you want, it's pretty unlikely that there will be any measurable remote effect on a macroscopic object like a PSI wheel based on brainwaves. Apart from this, I don't know about TK, but I have read about brain research re. meditation. But maybe that's less ridicule... :-)
@LaughingStock71 As I said. No one tried to measure while the subject is performing TK. Thus no way of kowing how the EEG will react. What you state is valid for normal conditions of measurement.
@malikc6 Anyways if you have any more questions or would like to discuss this further feel free to PM me. Now i'm going to bed cuz it's late and I have work in the morning so I wlll reply as soon as I get the chance.
@malikc6 Don't worry if you get no results keep your spirit up and try it for one hour per day. You wlll most surely see your proof. It is the mind that you have to train. Break the sek constructed walls of limitation. (That's not possible. that can't be. I can't do it etc.)
@sirusownslinkmania The brain does program the body. It functions everything and keeps the body in check. Haha textual vomit and redundant. What a geek you are. LOL!!
Ive done telekinesis couple of times too, also putting a bowl on it.it really works if the objects and the persons/conciousness energies are aligned..ive notest that the "best" way when it works is when you "empty" your mind and put your focus to the object with your eyes (transmitting energy) and also at the same time rise your ki energy that will eventually come through the hands and affect to the object.if we think it too much that spin,spin.it wont work then :) thanks for sharing this here..
Thank you very much...I'v wondered for a while is there any ongoing scientific research actually going into tk or pk or anything like that cus I think there should be some scientific evidence to back up either argument... Do you know of any research like that
Now I know this sounds stupid but is there a quick way that I can really without a doubt proof this to myself or dose it all take a lot of commitment (btw thanks for replying so soon and I will check out those books you suggested thanks again)
Okay so I have been wondering about this for some time and I have an open mind but I just don't know weather I can do this so I need to know not only wether I can do this I need to know if it's even possible...so if anyone can give me a link or some form of proof of if this is real and if I can do this I would be very thankful
fucking retard. It's called statit electricity build up from the electronics and magnet inside the bowl. moving your hand passed it, i will move the static charge and collect against the side of the bowl.
hi great video, i understand how real tk is...and only through my own experiences have i found my own truth...i use to do soccer freestyle until i broke my tail bone a few months ago, so i needed something to focus on...like u, i found it...you are right about having total belief, with no doubt...but no body told after the first time u do it, you get an "oh sh!t" i understood by thinking that, i still had alittle doubt buried deep down...well not any more
konrad100maciejewski@wp.pl Wiesz ja się nie chce tego uczyć,bo raz na religii przerabialiśmy temat o 10 przykazaniach bożych takich rozbudowanych i tam pisze : "Nie będziesz uprawiać wróżbiarstwa. Nie będziecie uprawiać czarów. Nie będziecie zwracać się do wywołujących duchy ani do wróżbitów.Nie będziecie zasięgać ich rady "
@mooki57 "I don't have to test it cos you made an unjustified claim" - What unjustified claim? That a psi-wheel is not a Crooke's Radiometer? Sorry, I already justified that via empirical evidence. Shine a big light on it, put your hand near, and I promise you, it will not move. Um, isn't that what I clearly stated? That gloves absorb heat? No offense, but learn how to read.....
@mooki57 Actually, you do have to test it because you made an unjustified claim and as they say, the onus lies on a person possessing a claim. As for Crooke's Radiometers, I debunked it empirically (I used the glove to absord heat, if you compare the temp. between a hand and glove, you'll notice the latter is hotter)
@mooki57 You're one of these people who can never admit when they're wrong, aren't you? You'd rather just keep flogging a dead horse. If you want to be a serious skeptic, bring something REAL to the table. Heat from the hand and Crookes radiometer have been disproven already (in the video you probably never bothered to watch).
@darrylsloan i noticed in this video you keep your hand next to the 'psi wheel' for about 2.30 mins in this video and in the other video the 'steaming' mug of tea doesnt look like its steaming and we only have your word that the video is at x16 and not x2 or x4. do yourself a favour and play devils advocate. make your tests against your psychic powers more fool proof and then wel be more compelled to believe it.
@mooki57 I don't care if you believe me, but don't come on my channel talking complete shit. If you want any credibility as a skeptic, have the decency to test what you're claiming. Your claim that it's heat from the hand is moronic.
@darrylsloan Chill man. i think i made a fair point. prove me wrong.
I'm not going to test what I'm claiming because I really don't care. you obviously do. I only commented on here because I was finding something to distract me from revision. But now wer on the subject, if you're going to make a video to prove skeptics wrong at least do it well. you're the one who will benefit from it.
and why is my claim moronic? i assume you dont think that Crooks radiometers are turned by psychics?
@darrylsloan learn to read a full sentence. it will be time better spent than turning a piece of foil 'with your mind'. and if you've really got these 'incredible' powers why not do something useful/impressive/cool with them.
what is more moronic; to think that the 'psi wheel' turns with the same dynamics as a Crooks radiometer, or to think that some people have super powers that can only be used to turn little foil things?
@mooki57 What an idiotic attempt to make me look bad by wildly speculating about what I actually believe. Of course, you've no clue what I believe regarding PK. You've never looked. Keep talking about Crookes radiometers. The rest of us will laugh, having watched the video that disproves it.
@mooki57 A few of the most expensive (concerning all of money, time and endeviour) developments of human is about doing stuff like hunting silly "unreal" particles like the Higgs Boson. Is this useful? Maybe in a hundred years but for the moment it's just not more than trying to understand how the world is build. If PSI wheel spinning turns out to be really due to something beyond current physical theory, then it plays in the same league as LHC-based research... just less expensive. :-)
@mooki57 Ah, well, if you believe I'm a liar, why did you say so from the start? Because now you've rigged the game completely in your favour. Now, there's nothing I can do to change your mind. Now, therefore, this conversation has nowhere to go. Adios.
@mooki57 Sloan knows how ta upload more vids & call you "idiotic" but does e know how t edit his own descriptions? Evidently no:
"Uploaded by darrylsloan on May 4, 2009
Telekinesis is often dismissed as heat or air currents. This demonstration shows that, with enough training, telekinesis can be done in a closed environment, defying conventional explanation. For me, achieving this after nine months of training brought final closure to my own scepticism."
@ShawnsterVideos I have tested your criticism of your so-called, "Crooke's Radiometer" under a glass cover, bright light, and my right hand near to it and for some reason it do not made a single movement. Could it be that your criticism is BS? Hmm, I wonder....
When I worked for gov., there was a group that was training operatives to levitate and stuff. The gov had located some tibetian monks and brought them to the US. The gov then wrote a book from what they learned. I found out about it when a trainee gave me a copy of the book. He dissapeared after that, and I was told to not worry about it. Oddly, I found a book online that is almost an exact replica, which shocked me. The link is on my channel videos. Its vital that people know what's going on.
"Telekinesis is often dismissed as heat or air currents. This demonstration shows that, with enough training, telekinesis can be done in a closed environment, defying conventional explanation." Or as the vid i made shows it can still be done via scamming and claiming that its telekinesis. This vid proves nothing, unless you get an outside observer then you can't claim real telekinesis.
ok apparently from science facts they believe that the psi wheel works because your hands are hotter than the room tempreture so the heat from your hands rises plus moves in circlier ways which allows this very light material to spin BUT big but i just tried it on my desk with a screw and paper and i can manage to turn it a little bit and make it wobble also what is very strange i can just look at it from the other side of my not so big room and the same happens. I really need an explenation
@nhp5252 Yeessss!!!! dude nitrous is what brought me to the realization that all this was possible....my energy would reach such a high state that the bulbs themselves would be pushed off my lap from my chi, qi , or whatever u wanna call it projected from my naval....very reall!!!!! those who dont believe will never experience, those who experience will never be deterred
i think possably the vibration from your pc/laptop on your desk is causing the spin. the rotation of your cooling fan may be causing this and also may explain why the effect is intermittent, works at a further distance and shielded from atmospheric menipulation by the bowl, yet it spins. my ps3 sitting on my desk generates enough vibratiinal force to move marbals and may also have the same effect on the same setup you have tried.
While TK is certainly possible. Even magicians have been able to do this under the glass I'm not saying you're a magicians or a fake though. What can also be happening is that your hand and likely some chi, is heating the air inside of the glass causing some internal air currents to further movie the pinwheel. Check out 'James Randy Exposes Hydrick' where even Randy was able to spin the pencil by directing outside air currents. The air is likely what's moving it inside the glass too..Good work
Darryl has extensively tested the heat claim in other vids. One way in which he tested it was by superheating the side the bowl with a space heater for ten minutes. Didn't move one milimeter. :)
@myhandisburned your an idiot. Do you know how much convectional heat energy it would take to move it? Besides, once it got into the glass container, if it were to do anything it would push the tin foil off the needle, it almost hardly likely turn it, because his hand isn't at the side of the bowl, it's in the middle. Btw your hand isn't radioactive. Unless ur spiderman.
@darrylsloan i see and i worked for you? does this have something to do with using more parts of your brain than others? You know cuz most people use only about 5% of their brains on average..
@atomisten The fact it can be duplicated by trickery doesn't mean it is done that way. Voting fraud occurred during the Industrilization, so does a vote for me in that time make me a fraud? Of course not!
He, along with others claiming such things, can't absolutely disprove trickery from an online video; however, he has strong credentials against the negative assertions the wannabe skeptics made (properly called pseudo-skeptics)
On the contrary, you also have the onus due to your claim...
I believe in telekinesis and other psychic ability's because the mind is very strong, but if telekinesis allows you to move and alter things with your mind, then why do you have to use your hands as well? Just a question I've been wondering for awhile.
@OurWill2Fight It's not essential to use the hand (see other videos), but it does appear to serve as a natural channel for the energy that causes the movement (you will sometimes feel exiting your palm). The energy appears to originate in the naval area, judging by physiological sensations
wow dumb dumb it is heat, using radiation energy from your hot palms transfering into convection current from the bowl covering it which is why it takes a minute for it to spin cuz the inside has to heat up a little
what your seeing is magnetic field is being disrupt by the hand (idk what i am talking about lol )
but try this : take a straw, and use your shirt and cloth to rub it couple times. and put in on the top of a bottle of water or coke , the straw will move.
@mofon1 It's not magnetism. Aluminium foil is non-magnetic. And it's not static (as in the straw). Static effects have thoroughly been tested in some previous videos.
@darrylsloan As a skeptic, critiquer in scientific & parapsychological studies, and a novice statistician, I disagree with your assumption that proof of psi lies on a huge amount of replicable, studies. I agree that some of these psi studies (like Ganzfeld) deserve further consideration, but proof is a nonexistent concept since there's always the possibility of the psi-hypothesis being rejected or modified based on new, empirical evidence.
Like you said, science is not absolute, it changes..
@atomisten Darryl is right that studies involving statistical analyses to measure/evaluate the degree of evidence against the null-hypothesis is a legitimate approach in the basis of scientific research. As for "chance expectation", he probably meant the # of successes/failures (usually from sample-size) that aren't statistically significant in statistical standards..
Data against chance expectation means the data is unlikely to occur by chance alone, which is evidence for the hypothesis....
@atomisten You obviously lack why statistics is a very important and a useful, scientific tool when it comes to evaluating psi claims and the JREF tests. Psi phenomena, as well as others, have a relationship in statistics. Even the JREF uses statistical analyses in their tests to measure the degree of evidence against the null-hypothesis. How do we know if there is evidece that someone is getting/influencing something? Intuition? No. Statistics? Of course!
@IceAges14Aces on the contrary, i graduated from a math school, and i learnt statistics too in university, but what we talked about was irrelevant to statistics and replications, because i only told him he is fraund unless he goes to these testing companies which give u a lot of money if your claims prove right. obviously when someone is deemed to be a real psychic, a lot of statistical analysis and replications will follow to measure the boundaries of the occurance, but thats irrelevant for him
@atomisten In any case, I agree with your conclusion that statistics/replications are irrelevant to his claim since his claim either happens or doesn't happen; however, I am afraid your proposition that he is a fraud because he failed to get tested is simply an argument from ignorance.....
@IceAges14Aces its not that he havent got tested, he is a fraud because he is searching for excuses not to get the 1million dollar prize... this is like when someone doesn't let a policeman search his bag, obv the guy is hiding something else he would let the search done in 10sec, if u think otherwise im afraid it's only ignorance on your part.
@atomisten It seems you're putting your faith in the assumption that he is a fraud simply because he supposedly made excuses instead of actually looking for substantial, empirical evidence that fully justify him as a fraud.
I hate to tell you this, but your assumption is purely discrimination.
It's going to take more than just excuses to convince me. How about finding genuine evidence against him in his videos that justify him using trickery??? That's something more believable....
@IceAges14Aces lol dude you are funny, how about HIM proving us that he doesnt do any tricks, i can replicate the same occurance with this limited sight we have got from the camera angle 100times with different tricks. u just need a magnet, or wind or a very small wire (which they use in professional movies) or just a video effect trick, cutting etc. when someone wants to prove the world he is psychic through YOUTUBE, then he has no excuse not to prove it officially, unless he is a fraud.
look, for all you idiots out there, there's no reason for this not to be real! i believe in God and i cant see Him but i know He's out there. You might not have a rational explanation for telekinesis but why is it so far away from belief? Just because you cant see it, or the forces acting on it, that doesnt mean its not real. Plus, if you think it isnt real then why waste your time watching videos like this?
@calebandstef 17??? Wow, I'm 17 too.. HAHA! Who said I was mad??? I wasn't mad, I was just demonstrating your profound idiocy and bigotry. You call yourself a critical thinker? HAHA your ludicrously is very amusing XD!!! If you're really a thinker, you wouldn't ad hominem, e.g. blah blah don't reply, and generalize that darryl is a fraud from one of his video. Yeah, whatever man whatever....
@calebandstef It's truly baffling how you failed to grasp just how rigorous and scrutinize he was in his telekinetic experiments. You just generalized that all his telekinetic videos are misleading and accussed him as fraud simply because of that video (which only an imprudent, bigoted, pseudointellectual moron would do..)
The fact that you insult me so much is just sad. I just turned 17, and you're what? 24? Take a chill pill or go smoke some dope, I mean, you clearly have nothing better to do then to pick on someone who's just trying to save some of these people's time.
Also.. It doesn't take a bunch of videos of him saying he's tricking everybody to prove he's tricking everybody.. blahhhhhh now stop replying, don't got time for this shiiii
...cont...You can feel the forces by putting your hands very closely together and moving them slowly...feeling....the force as your hands spread out and close back together. You have to be perceptible as the force may seem very weak until you can more readily detect it. It is not magic, everyone has it, some generate more of this force than others. Look up Qi Gong, that will help you to further understand the principles of Chi. Thumbs up for you darrylsloan.
This is not hard to do actually, it is harder to move it under glass for sure though. This is Chi (a form of Telekinesis). I've been doing it for a while now (no luck under glass as yet). Most of it radiates from the palms or meridians of one's hand. It feels kind of like the forces that exist when trying to put the like fields of a magnet together. You feel the force working. You hands radiate this, which in turn moves the Chi Wheel. You can control direction as well with practice...cont....
My simple question is this - if this sort of stuff is real, why isn't this man highly televised and rich, etc...? surely a man who can genuinely move things with his mind would be very high in public interest.... sick of these stupid amateur youtube vids...
@LaughingStock71 Agree!
Statistics in the basis of psi-experiments should only be used when probabilities usually games of chance such as Zener Cards, dice, etc. come into play.Using statistics in psi-wheel experiments is impossible because you cannot calculate the P-value of a psi-wheel.
Besides, why bother statistics since the evidence in psi-wheel experiments are self-evident, i.e. either happens or doesn't?
IceAges14Aces 1 day ago
@Dada1Tube Isn't it baffling how people like you are quick to draw out of prejudices without even bothering to bring the evidence to the table? If skeptics were like you, Carl Sagan, the man who advocated healthy skepticism would be rolling in his grave...
For your information and education, vibrations doesn't cause the psi-wheel to spin, it actually wobbles. Don't believe me? Create a psi-wheel, leave it on a table, hammer the ground with your feet and watch that sucker wobble...
IceAges14Aces 1 day ago
@LaughingStock71 Sorry but your psi-wheel=Crooke's Radiometer theory is completely incorrect. I have tested that theory many times under a bright light and my hand nearby and it did not made a single movement whatsoever, despite the fact of its really low friction...
IceAges14Aces 1 day ago
@IceAges14Aces What do you mean by "my theory"? Maybe you got me wrong. I have cited construction features of the radiometer and made clear that that the PSI wheel has completely different features. Hence, PSI wheel DIFFERENT FROM Radiometer. Just to make this clear to all those people out there who claim PSI wheels are just radiometers. It's complete nonsense!
LaughingStock71 1 day ago
@LaughingStock71 Ahh, I see your point now :)...
Sorry for the misconception, I thought you were one of those Psi-wheels=Crooke's Radiometers idiots....
IceAges14Aces 1 day ago
Apropos Crooke's Radiometer: From Wikipedia:
"""
The radiometer is made from a glass bulb from which much of the air has been removed to form a partial vacuum. [...] The effect begins to be seen at partial vacuum pressures of a few torr (several hundred pascals)
"""
For comparison, the PSI wheel here rotates under normal conditions, which is about 100,000 Pascal! Another crucial feature of a Radiometer:
"""
The vanes are polished or white on one side, black on the other.
"""
Got it?
LaughingStock71 2 days ago
Hey man. Latley i got pretty good. I'm able to move it from across the room without my hands. Is that good or pretty normal?
ADAMZUPANCIC 2 days ago
ok to put a end to this bs.. first off small vibrations on the table such as that laptop computer is causeing the wheel to move.. and above all that bowl might look flush but there is nano bits of air comeing throuwhere the bowl meets the table
Dada1Tube 2 days ago
@Dada1Tube Small vibrations on the table, eh? Did you test that? No? But you believe it anyway, without testing? Yes. Oh, how very scientific. I, on the other hand, have tested this, and other conventional explanations, and I've made videos about them all. But you didn't bother to look before stating completely untenable explanations.
darrylsloan 2 days ago 3
@darrylsloan Owned him^^
ameiseTrudi 1 day ago
@Dada1Tube Yeah, you finally got the trick! Unfortunately, it turns out that it only moves that smooth and continuously with /Good/ Vibrations, as those produced by the lovely ghosts living in Darryl's house. Otherwise, it will just shake randomly up and down, and forth and back, or simply shivering - which is the reason why you haven't manage it yet to do the same at your own home. ;-)
LaughingStock71 2 days ago
once i had connected with a pen i was staring on in a library and then i started rotating it counter clockwise and then clockwise till i pushed it on the other side of the table and realised my freinds staring at me as if i am a ghost
maannik123 2 days ago
After strong, sucessful telekenetic activity all day today, I found myself unably to do it anymore, have you had any experiwnces like this?
FateWulluf 3 days ago
Im proud to say that there is no such thing as Telekinesis! But THE FORCE lives in each one of us.... "May The Force Be With You"
alpunkbrewster 6 days ago
Is there any sites or books about this telekinesis?
malikc6 1 week ago
@malikc6 Well, there's mine. :-) Or you could try Sean Connelly's "The Psion's Handbook." Google it for an ebook.
darrylsloan 1 week ago
@darrylsloan You say you have a book? Is there anywhere in portadown or somewhere in the local area it can be purchased?
Peetree777 1 day ago in playlist More videos from darrylsloan
@Peetree777 Sorry, no. I didn't go the bookshop route with this. Online ordering only, via the website link on my main channel page. Or, if you search for my name on eBay, you can do it that way. Thanks for your interest.
darrylsloan 23 hours ago
I've been using your techniques for about three days now with and without a bowl. I've not had much luck with the bowl on but without it it's definitely moved. I'm glad you told me about moving your hands to communicate with your subconscious. I'll try that next and see if I can get it to spin. I might also try using binoculars to make certain my breath isn't moving it.
EternumBlaze 1 week ago
my first day trying it was when i was ten. i was afraid when it happend. i willed the air fan to go on and it did, at the same time the window slamed open and i mean slamed. i recently have come to the undertanding that it i a gift given to me buy God from birth t ha alway been within me. Cool....
gregknightstemplar 1 week ago
listen i could believe it.. but this is again not true.. only thing that is considered superstitious by science but is actually true is Astrology.
Why does whatever kinesis has to be so dramatic.. putting your open hands in front of it.. shaking them.. like you re feeling some energy.. i would more rather believe it if some winked and made the thing move !
arooni33 1 week ago
Awesome....:D
lost4soul 1 week ago
I have tried heating the bowl in the microwave to see if that made the psi wheel spin i also tried putting psi wheel on to a warm surface like where a hot drink had been resting to see if that made it spin both didn't work. I can't yet make it spin threw the bowl but the day is near. Your vids are great don't be phased by the skeptics that don't put there theories to the test before guessing how its done
TheParachute87 1 week ago
Hi Darryl, I haven't actually watched this particular video of yours, yet. Generally speaking, you don't seem like you are satisfied with your progress rate. May I ask how much time -averagely- have you been spending during your practises? (i.e.: 4 days a week, 1 hour each time)
AkrepVeSu 1 week ago
Th wheel is moving because of the laptop --'
ScamaroneStefano 1 week ago
@ScamaroneStefano
lol....rofl lol again lol hahahahaa I think the laptop is called ectoplasm
lost4soul 1 week ago
Next try it in an actual sealed container, not this one that isn't at all airtight against the table. How about putting the bowl upside down in a dish of water, so the edge is submerged and you can't blow into it?
And how about moving something that isn't easily affected by air currents like the convection you'd get from holding a heat source (your hand) next to one side of the container?
phunkydroid 1 week ago
My take on it... watching this video... it is the heat... just by small changes in the temparature can cause small airflowes.
mheckemann 1 week ago
One question......if its telekinesis why do you use your hand? Wouldnt you have to use your brain?
keroncoward 1 week ago in playlist V Log 6
@keroncoward PK involves projecting energy from within yourself outward. When you say it's the brain, are you presuming that this is done without some form of energy transfer, in defiance of the laws of physics? Because that's not my take on this at all. The hand is a convenient conduit.
darrylsloan 1 week ago
@darrylsloan ok i think i understand what you mean now. what youre doing is similar to what chinese call CHI.
keroncoward 1 week ago
@darrylsloan but why do you have to be so close? why not use your hand as a convenient conduit from far away? Glass conducts heat pretty easily, doesn't it? I'm not usually a skeptic, but I'm sorry, I don't see anything but the transfer of heat energy.
skyskape411 1 week ago
@skyskape411 You suggested an alternative explanation (heat penetrating the glass) and you immediately believed it without even testing whether it's viable. How is that skepticism? (You need to see my other videos on this, because I've done this test and many more.)
darrylsloan 1 week ago
@darrylsloan have you been keeping up with TK practice?
robuzy 1 week ago
@robuzy Somewhat. But I can't report on any further development, sadly.
darrylsloan 1 week ago
@darrylsloan I have watched the other videos (yours and others) and they have changed my opinion for sure. But please don't suggest that one needs to test everything before being able to raise a valid doubt. Heat transfer just seems more logical than telekinesis based what I've been taught, that's all. I now see that it may not be the answer. Thanks!
skyskape411 1 week ago
@skyskape411 Thanks for being reasonable. If I seemed a little sharp, it's because skeptical suggestions are more often voiced in the form of dogma.
darrylsloan 1 week ago
@keroncoward I'm convinced, neuro scientists would get very upset, if someone would seriously claim that the brain is able to do telekinesis, that is, remotely affecting items without any direct physical connection. I guess, they would rather answer, it must somehow be due to using the hand. ;-)
LaughingStock71 1 day ago
el papel es de ALIMINIO! y bajo la mesa hay otro wey con un iman ¬¬
liinaMiiau 1 week ago
@liinaMiiau aluminio*
liinaMiiau 1 week ago
How long you trained?
Rebelka345 2 weeks ago
When you imagine it spinning do you imagine it spinning at the same time it actually is or faster?
HipHopaaDoodle 2 weeks ago
@irsleepy well i can do this pretty good without the glass bowl
MrKennypwnd 2 weeks ago
The feeling is verry hard to explain but it is obvious. Sometimes it's almost like a mild muscle fever in your brain, not a headache mind you but a specific feeling that you don't get by doing anything else. Practice enough and you will get the hang of it. Advice: do NOT force it to move, rather "let it move" or will it to move but not forcefully. If you try to force. almost all your concentration goes into the act of forcing or straining yourself and none in the act itself.
sirusownslinkmania 2 weeks ago
@sirusownslinkmania How can I train. I will do anything and I am almost completely dedicated to learning. Even if I don't succeed in making it actually move, it will still be a very nice experience. Please PM me any type of advice and instructions, make it as long as you want I want to learn as much as I can but I cant find any type of tutorials online on what I need to accomplish!
XRedHackX 2 weeks ago
@XRedHackX first thing to do is make PSI Ball, the easiest way to get kinetic energy
mmlrl25 2 weeks ago
@mmlrl25 and how exactly is THAT possible? PSI balls don't seem as realistic as spinning PSI wheels. I mean, I'm not one to judge as I haven't actually witnessed one being made or made one myself but seriously, a SOLID ball out off energy from the earth. Please. explain!
XRedHackX 2 weeks ago
@XRedHackX go to this site learn-telekinesis-training(.)com/
mmlrl25 2 weeks ago
Imagine what you could do if you really practiced this for years, i shall start now
MrKennypwnd 3 weeks ago
@MrKennypwnd Anything yet?
iRSleepy 2 weeks ago
bs
chromakey84 3 weeks ago
Im getting good at telekinesis myself. i need a lot of training
jdaniels161 3 weeks ago
The experimental method was lacking too much precision to credible..
You could have secured a device enabling an alternating EMF which would induce a magnetic field in your foil target..
Perform on Clear Glass for credibility
Eldritch8 3 weeks ago
@Eldritch8 All been done. Check out my other videos, especially the one called "7-day test for skeptics."
darrylsloan 3 weeks ago
@darrylsloan This is bullcrap and defies the laws of physics. To put something in motion, you have to have some sort of energy like pushing or pulling or picking up something. With your brain, there is no energy. It just programs the body, how can you pick up something with your mind? There is no energy doing this...
malikc6 3 weeks ago
@malikc6 If it were not energy based, it would be bullcrap. Nobody's claiming this is supernatural, just currently unexplained. There does seem to be a mechanism for transferring energy from the body to outside the body. Don't waste your time calling me liar. I'm not interested in your belief or non-belief. Either investigate or don't. Up to you.
darrylsloan 3 weeks ago
@darrylsloan
In a computer RPG you merely press a button and your wizard guy or whatever can cast a spell. What if in our universe we can similarly key into the right combination and produce an effect? Isn't that consistent with the universe being a gigantic program. Input and output.
MetaphysicalShadows 3 weeks ago
@MetaphysicalShadows Psi (or magic) can't be that simple or predictable. If it were, it would have become established science long ago.
darrylsloan 3 weeks ago
@darrylsloan
Maybe the right mental state is just very hard to find. Are you then saying it happens by happenstance according to the right energy which may be "floating around" so to speak? How does that account for repeatability? And also that not all people can tap into the same similarity space? I thought before you said anyone can do this (though its been a while, so I'm not entirely sure that's what you said).
MetaphysicalShadows 3 weeks ago
@MetaphysicalShadows Not happenstance. Psi phenomena have their basis in the ability of the mind to communicate with a deep part of the unconscious mind. This is what accounts for its unpredictability. It is done by something beyond conscious thought - a deeper part of you. This is what accounts for its slippperiess. It is like temporarily breaking the natural working of the mind. At best, there is a partial repeatability that is scientifically valid only under statistics.
darrylsloan 3 weeks ago
@darrylsloan Erm, I am reading this discussion about "statistic relevance" quite often. And it is probably a relevant aspect of experiments like were one has to manipulate the outcome of a random generator. But for the PSI wheel, I don't see where statistics comes into play. If it moves smoothly and continuously in the same direction for 20 seconds when the conditions are such that it's impossible to move that way, then TK has been proven just as for any other mechanical phenomenon.
LaughingStock71 1 day ago
@darrylsloan Reasonable comment on a general level, and certainly true for stuff like "reading the aura", where there is no real way to come up with a proper measurement theory or to make scientific experiments for either finding clear evidence or to falsify. But PSI wheel spinning behaves just like a traditional physics experiment, just that there is a human in the loop - so just like a mixture of a physical and a psychological experiment. And you succeed to spin it regularly, no?
LaughingStock71 1 day ago
@darrylsloan To be honest, I think its possible. I just get really frustrated that this isnt proven but yet people claim to do it and I cant. Who knows, maybe we can somehow take energy within our body and release it.
malikc6 2 weeks ago
@malikc6 It does not defy anything.The current "laws of physics" are valid for the physical world only. But when including the multidimensional reality and the MIND, things change. The brain only programs the body? Well that statement makes the rest of your comment pretty much redundant. Before spewing out textual vomit and preconcieved beliefs try doing some research or actual experimentation for once instead of taking for granted these "laws of physics" of yours.
sirusownslinkmania 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
malikc6 2 weeks ago
@malikc6 That assumption is as pathetic as your understanding of life. If you keep looking at it from a 3D perspective then you won't go to far in your wisdom. A force clearly affects the object but we can only speculate of its origin and nature. As I said do your own experiments and then draw a conclusion. Believe what you will, it's your loss anyways
sirusownslinkmania 2 weeks ago
@sirusownslinkmania Ok mister smart guy. Do YOU know how to do this feat?
malikc6 2 weeks ago
@malikc6 Make a psi wheel which is the starting point of this skill, then place your awareness on the object, be aware of its shape and size in space and try to feel it as if it were a part of you. Have an open mind and do not start this with failiure in your mind. Try to realize that it actually is possible but more than that, YOU can do it. Next try to feel and see it move in the directon you want. Always remember that it is your mind that limits you, for you can do anything.
sirusownslinkmania 2 weeks ago
@sirusownslinkmania Let me ask you something. If its real, why is it still unanswered? What energy is doing this? Like I said, the laws of physics states that there has to be energy doing moving the object. I just wanna know what it is before I attempt this feat.
malikc6 2 weeks ago
@malikc6 As I said we can only speculate of the nature and origin of this force. But it may be that brainwaves if focused and with enough power can ineract with this force and create an effect. Or perhaps conert it into kinetic energy.
sirusownslinkmania 2 weeks ago
@sirusownslinkmania By "brainwaves", do you mean what gets measured by an EEG? Do you have a clue what the result would be to an EEG measurement, if the brainwaves would be so strong that they can move a PSI wheel from a distance of >50cm?
LaughingStock71 1 day ago
@LaughingStock71 It is just an assumption. I don't think it has ever been atempted to monitor the brainwaves of a person doing telekinesis. This is because no one believes it and it is subject to ridicule. But those open enough to experiment know the truth. I do not think it is a matter of how strong the brainwaves are but of how much are they focused.
sirusownslinkmania 1 day ago
@sirusownslinkmania You can read in the Wikipedia article on "Electroencephalography" that the voltage at the electrodes of an EEG is at most 100 microVolt. So, I guess, you can focus as much as you want, it's pretty unlikely that there will be any measurable remote effect on a macroscopic object like a PSI wheel based on brainwaves. Apart from this, I don't know about TK, but I have read about brain research re. meditation. But maybe that's less ridicule... :-)
LaughingStock71 1 day ago
@LaughingStock71 As I said. No one tried to measure while the subject is performing TK. Thus no way of kowing how the EEG will react. What you state is valid for normal conditions of measurement.
sirusownslinkmania 1 day ago
@malikc6 *convert. Sorry for the typos
sirusownslinkmania 2 weeks ago
@sirusownslinkmania Got a point there..
malikc6 2 weeks ago
@malikc6 Anyways if you have any more questions or would like to discuss this further feel free to PM me. Now i'm going to bed cuz it's late and I have work in the morning so I wlll reply as soon as I get the chance.
sirusownslinkmania 2 weeks ago
@malikc6 Don't worry if you get no results keep your spirit up and try it for one hour per day. You wlll most surely see your proof. It is the mind that you have to train. Break the sek constructed walls of limitation. (That's not possible. that can't be. I can't do it etc.)
sirusownslinkmania 2 weeks ago
@sirusownslinkmania And I think understand life quite well so stop with your immature insulting comments wise guy..
malikc6 2 weeks ago
@sirusownslinkmania The brain does program the body. It functions everything and keeps the body in check. Haha textual vomit and redundant. What a geek you are. LOL!!
malikc6 2 weeks ago
@darrylsloan I am unconvinced,because it lacks correct use of the experimental method.
Enjoy experimenting...
Eldritch8 3 weeks ago
Ive done telekinesis couple of times too, also putting a bowl on it.it really works if the objects and the persons/conciousness energies are aligned..ive notest that the "best" way when it works is when you "empty" your mind and put your focus to the object with your eyes (transmitting energy) and also at the same time rise your ki energy that will eventually come through the hands and affect to the object.if we think it too much that spin,spin.it wont work then :) thanks for sharing this here..
InfiniteSpiritMe 3 weeks ago
Thanks for all the help and advice really appreciate it friend
maziodor 3 weeks ago
Thank you very much...I'v wondered for a while is there any ongoing scientific research actually going into tk or pk or anything like that cus I think there should be some scientific evidence to back up either argument... Do you know of any research like that
maziodor 3 weeks ago
@maziodor The books "The Conscious Universe" and "Entangled Minds" by Dean Radin. Also "Mental Radio" by Upton Sinclair - an oldie but goodie.
darrylsloan 3 weeks ago
Now I know this sounds stupid but is there a quick way that I can really without a doubt proof this to myself or dose it all take a lot of commitment (btw thanks for replying so soon and I will check out those books you suggested thanks again)
maziodor 4 weeks ago
@maziodor No shortcut. If this was easy, it would be a part of established science long ago.
darrylsloan 4 weeks ago
Okay so I have been wondering about this for some time and I have an open mind but I just don't know weather I can do this so I need to know not only wether I can do this I need to know if it's even possible...so if anyone can give me a link or some form of proof of if this is real and if I can do this I would be very thankful
maziodor 4 weeks ago
@maziodor Read Dean Radin's books. But the only way you will remove all doubt is through personal experience, and that takes work.
darrylsloan 4 weeks ago
fucking retard. It's called statit electricity build up from the electronics and magnet inside the bowl. moving your hand passed it, i will move the static charge and collect against the side of the bowl.
hellflare55 1 month ago
@hellflare55 Actually, all of that has been tested in other videos I've made. The egg's on your face, not mine.
darrylsloan 1 month ago 4
hi great video, i understand how real tk is...and only through my own experiences have i found my own truth...i use to do soccer freestyle until i broke my tail bone a few months ago, so i needed something to focus on...like u, i found it...you are right about having total belief, with no doubt...but no body told after the first time u do it, you get an "oh sh!t" i understood by thinking that, i still had alittle doubt buried deep down...well not any more
thealex71 1 month ago
being that it is not a real vacuum, its very small scale convection=)
Magneticitist 1 month ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
konrad100maciejewski@wp.pl Wiesz ja się nie chce tego uczyć,bo raz na religii przerabialiśmy temat o 10 przykazaniach bożych takich rozbudowanych i tam pisze : "Nie będziesz uprawiać wróżbiarstwa. Nie będziecie uprawiać czarów. Nie będziecie zwracać się do wywołujących duchy ani do wróżbitów.Nie będziecie zasięgać ich rady "
Myślisz że to grzech ta cała telekineza ?
konrad100maciejewski 1 month ago
Comment removed
IceAges14Aces 1 month ago
@mooki57 "I don't have to test it cos you made an unjustified claim" - What unjustified claim? That a psi-wheel is not a Crooke's Radiometer? Sorry, I already justified that via empirical evidence. Shine a big light on it, put your hand near, and I promise you, it will not move. Um, isn't that what I clearly stated? That gloves absorb heat? No offense, but learn how to read.....
IceAges14Aces 1 month ago
Would the person who keeps flagging IceAges14Aces's comment as spam please stop. It's not spam just because you disagree with him.
darrylsloan 1 month ago
@mooki57 Actually, you do have to test it because you made an unjustified claim and as they say, the onus lies on a person possessing a claim. As for Crooke's Radiometers, I debunked it empirically (I used the glove to absord heat, if you compare the temp. between a hand and glove, you'll notice the latter is hotter)
IceAges14Aces 1 month ago
@IceAges14Aces i dont have to test it cos you made the first 'unjustified claim'.
also, you're an idiot. why do you think people wear gloves when its cold. because it keeps the heat in. its an insulator.
learn the laws of thermodynamics! or, you know, spend 9 months staring a a piece of foil. whatever suits you i suppose.
and as for the torch light. theyr made to be efficient, ie convert the batteries energy into light and not waste it on heat.
mooki57 1 month ago 2
@mooki57 You're one of these people who can never admit when they're wrong, aren't you? You'd rather just keep flogging a dead horse. If you want to be a serious skeptic, bring something REAL to the table. Heat from the hand and Crookes radiometer have been disproven already (in the video you probably never bothered to watch).
darrylsloan 1 month ago
@darrylsloan Exactly!!!
IceAges14Aces 1 month ago
Heat travels through glass you moomin!
mooki57 1 month ago
@mooki57 watch?v=l6Ke7pev8ts ... Let me know when you've finished wiping the egg off your face.
darrylsloan 1 month ago
@darrylsloan i noticed in this video you keep your hand next to the 'psi wheel' for about 2.30 mins in this video and in the other video the 'steaming' mug of tea doesnt look like its steaming and we only have your word that the video is at x16 and not x2 or x4. do yourself a favour and play devils advocate. make your tests against your psychic powers more fool proof and then wel be more compelled to believe it.
mooki57 1 month ago
@mooki57 I don't care if you believe me, but don't come on my channel talking complete shit. If you want any credibility as a skeptic, have the decency to test what you're claiming. Your claim that it's heat from the hand is moronic.
darrylsloan 1 month ago
@darrylsloan Chill man. i think i made a fair point. prove me wrong.
I'm not going to test what I'm claiming because I really don't care. you obviously do. I only commented on here because I was finding something to distract me from revision. But now wer on the subject, if you're going to make a video to prove skeptics wrong at least do it well. you're the one who will benefit from it.
and why is my claim moronic? i assume you dont think that Crooks radiometers are turned by psychics?
mooki57 1 month ago
@mooki57 "I'm not going to test what I'm claiming" - that really says it all.
darrylsloan 1 month ago
@darrylsloan learn to read a full sentence. it will be time better spent than turning a piece of foil 'with your mind'. and if you've really got these 'incredible' powers why not do something useful/impressive/cool with them.
what is more moronic; to think that the 'psi wheel' turns with the same dynamics as a Crooks radiometer, or to think that some people have super powers that can only be used to turn little foil things?
prove me wrong and do something impressive!
mooki57 1 month ago 2
@mooki57 What an idiotic attempt to make me look bad by wildly speculating about what I actually believe. Of course, you've no clue what I believe regarding PK. You've never looked. Keep talking about Crookes radiometers. The rest of us will laugh, having watched the video that disproves it.
darrylsloan 1 month ago
@mooki57 A few of the most expensive (concerning all of money, time and endeviour) developments of human is about doing stuff like hunting silly "unreal" particles like the Higgs Boson. Is this useful? Maybe in a hundred years but for the moment it's just not more than trying to understand how the world is build. If PSI wheel spinning turns out to be really due to something beyond current physical theory, then it plays in the same league as LHC-based research... just less expensive. :-)
LaughingStock71 1 day ago
@mooki57 Ah, well, if you believe I'm a liar, why did you say so from the start? Because now you've rigged the game completely in your favour. Now, there's nothing I can do to change your mind. Now, therefore, this conversation has nowhere to go. Adios.
darrylsloan 1 month ago
@darrylsloan haha. thanks for you time.
mooki57 1 month ago 2
@mooki57 Sloan knows how ta upload more vids & call you "idiotic" but does e know how t edit his own descriptions? Evidently no:
"Uploaded by darrylsloan on May 4, 2009
Telekinesis is often dismissed as heat or air currents. This demonstration shows that, with enough training, telekinesis can be done in a closed environment, defying conventional explanation. For me, achieving this after nine months of training brought final closure to my own scepticism."
Sad, the way Sloan misleads folks.
FemurmurVideos 1 month ago
@FemurmurVideos Wow, what an amazing critique. You just demolished everything I've ever said on PK.
darrylsloan 1 month ago
@ShawnsterVideos I have tested your criticism of your so-called, "Crooke's Radiometer" under a glass cover, bright light, and my right hand near to it and for some reason it do not made a single movement. Could it be that your criticism is BS? Hmm, I wonder....
IceAges14Aces 1 month ago
When I worked for gov., there was a group that was training operatives to levitate and stuff. The gov had located some tibetian monks and brought them to the US. The gov then wrote a book from what they learned. I found out about it when a trainee gave me a copy of the book. He dissapeared after that, and I was told to not worry about it. Oddly, I found a book online that is almost an exact replica, which shocked me. The link is on my channel videos. Its vital that people know what's going on.
JAPI616 1 month ago
"Telekinesis is often dismissed as heat or air currents. This demonstration shows that, with enough training, telekinesis can be done in a closed environment, defying conventional explanation." Or as the vid i made shows it can still be done via scamming and claiming that its telekinesis. This vid proves nothing, unless you get an outside observer then you can't claim real telekinesis.
rhubis 1 month ago 2
Thank you, @rhubis for stating the truth.
ShawnsterVideos 1 month ago
do you have any suficient probe from reserches and video maked from independet comsion? because all this is not enough to convict the peoples.
discusdiscus1 1 month ago
i don't know if anyone else noticed it, but the thing only jiggled when he shook the table.
EPIC FAIL
meshaljoseph 1 month ago in playlist More videos from darrylsloan 2
Great clip! looks like your hard work is payin off! :D
FireFlies458 1 month ago
It happens because energy waves are in the air all around us. The people who tap into this believe in this sixth skill.
amyalewine 1 month ago
Nice video. I enjoy the Chi Wheel also. What do you do in order to channel the Chi? I have found many hidden skills we can tap into.
amyalewine 1 month ago
What kind of magnet u have :)
Niksaftw 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ok apparently from science facts they believe that the psi wheel works because your hands are hotter than the room tempreture so the heat from your hands rises plus moves in circlier ways which allows this very light material to spin BUT big but i just tried it on my desk with a screw and paper and i can manage to turn it a little bit and make it wobble also what is very strange i can just look at it from the other side of my not so big room and the same happens. I really need an explenation
kevinrust1986 1 month ago
TRY INHALING NITROUS
nhp5252 1 month ago
@nhp5252 Yeessss!!!! dude nitrous is what brought me to the realization that all this was possible....my energy would reach such a high state that the bulbs themselves would be pushed off my lap from my chi, qi , or whatever u wanna call it projected from my naval....very reall!!!!! those who dont believe will never experience, those who experience will never be deterred
Staffo420 1 month ago
Ëy darryl when are you gonna air a new video
tannerman9t 1 month ago
HOW DO YOU DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!
please tell me
sk8man65 1 month ago
@sk8man65 telekinesis.
DanilinkGamer 1 month ago
i think possably the vibration from your pc/laptop on your desk is causing the spin. the rotation of your cooling fan may be causing this and also may explain why the effect is intermittent, works at a further distance and shielded from atmospheric menipulation by the bowl, yet it spins. my ps3 sitting on my desk generates enough vibratiinal force to move marbals and may also have the same effect on the same setup you have tried.
jcwarlock 1 month ago
@jcwarlock All of your suggestions have been ruled out in my later video "Psychokinesis: 7-day test for skeptics."
darrylsloan 1 month ago
what is your desk made from?
seedofthepeople 1 month ago
@seedofthepeople Wood, with a formica-like coating.
darrylsloan 1 month ago
@jcwarlock typical respond/answer from an obvious atheist.
sheffieldgeek 1 month ago
@michaelhunteralc Don't be an idiot, seriously...
IceAges14Aces 1 month ago
While TK is certainly possible. Even magicians have been able to do this under the glass I'm not saying you're a magicians or a fake though. What can also be happening is that your hand and likely some chi, is heating the air inside of the glass causing some internal air currents to further movie the pinwheel. Check out 'James Randy Exposes Hydrick' where even Randy was able to spin the pencil by directing outside air currents. The air is likely what's moving it inside the glass too..Good work
Gungfuman77 2 months ago
@Gungfuman77
Darryl has extensively tested the heat claim in other vids. One way in which he tested it was by superheating the side the bowl with a space heater for ten minutes. Didn't move one milimeter. :)
NSPride1488 1 month ago
Pretty sure his hand would have to melt to actually be that hot anyways.
Crazybuttshell 2 months ago
@myhandisburned your an idiot. Do you know how much convectional heat energy it would take to move it? Besides, once it got into the glass container, if it were to do anything it would push the tin foil off the needle, it almost hardly likely turn it, because his hand isn't at the side of the bowl, it's in the middle. Btw your hand isn't radioactive. Unless ur spiderman.
Crazybuttshell 2 months ago
im still not completely sure if telekinesis is true but im keeping an open mind so i was just wondering were you learned
UberRuler 2 months ago
@UberRuler Just my own experimentation, shooting in the dark. No guides.
darrylsloan 2 months ago
@darrylsloan i see and i worked for you? does this have something to do with using more parts of your brain than others? You know cuz most people use only about 5% of their brains on average..
UberRuler 2 months ago
i dont get how a psi ball can effect ur emotions if u make to many?
PlatinumPegasisxD 2 months ago
Zzzzzzzzzzz.......................
Zmistake 2 months ago
@atomisten The fact it can be duplicated by trickery doesn't mean it is done that way. Voting fraud occurred during the Industrilization, so does a vote for me in that time make me a fraud? Of course not!
He, along with others claiming such things, can't absolutely disprove trickery from an online video; however, he has strong credentials against the negative assertions the wannabe skeptics made (properly called pseudo-skeptics)
On the contrary, you also have the onus due to your claim...
IceAges14Aces 2 months ago
I believe in telekinesis and other psychic ability's because the mind is very strong, but if telekinesis allows you to move and alter things with your mind, then why do you have to use your hands as well? Just a question I've been wondering for awhile.
OurWill2Fight 2 months ago in playlist More videos from darrylsloan
@OurWill2Fight It's not essential to use the hand (see other videos), but it does appear to serve as a natural channel for the energy that causes the movement (you will sometimes feel exiting your palm). The energy appears to originate in the naval area, judging by physiological sensations
darrylsloan 2 months ago
@darrylsloan lol there is a magnet under the table, its as simple as that
michaelhunteralc 1 month ago
@OurWill2Fight you dont have to use ur hands
kekons23 2 months ago
if ur in denial, then try to transfer ur telekinesis into a cold dead object, say a wand and point it at it and see if it spins
myhandisburned 2 months ago
wow dumb dumb it is heat, using radiation energy from your hot palms transfering into convection current from the bowl covering it which is why it takes a minute for it to spin cuz the inside has to heat up a little
myhandisburned 2 months ago
@myhandisburned You're an idiot. watch?v=l6Ke7pev8ts
darrylsloan 2 months ago
there is no such thing as telekiness
what your seeing is magnetic field is being disrupt by the hand (idk what i am talking about lol )
but try this : take a straw, and use your shirt and cloth to rub it couple times. and put in on the top of a bottle of water or coke , the straw will move.
mofon1 2 months ago
@mofon1 It's not magnetism. Aluminium foil is non-magnetic. And it's not static (as in the straw). Static effects have thoroughly been tested in some previous videos.
darrylsloan 2 months ago
@darrylsloan As a skeptic, critiquer in scientific & parapsychological studies, and a novice statistician, I disagree with your assumption that proof of psi lies on a huge amount of replicable, studies. I agree that some of these psi studies (like Ganzfeld) deserve further consideration, but proof is a nonexistent concept since there's always the possibility of the psi-hypothesis being rejected or modified based on new, empirical evidence.
Like you said, science is not absolute, it changes..
IceAges14Aces 2 months ago
@atomisten Darryl is right that studies involving statistical analyses to measure/evaluate the degree of evidence against the null-hypothesis is a legitimate approach in the basis of scientific research. As for "chance expectation", he probably meant the # of successes/failures (usually from sample-size) that aren't statistically significant in statistical standards..
Data against chance expectation means the data is unlikely to occur by chance alone, which is evidence for the hypothesis....
IceAges14Aces 2 months ago
@atomisten You obviously lack why statistics is a very important and a useful, scientific tool when it comes to evaluating psi claims and the JREF tests. Psi phenomena, as well as others, have a relationship in statistics. Even the JREF uses statistical analyses in their tests to measure the degree of evidence against the null-hypothesis. How do we know if there is evidece that someone is getting/influencing something? Intuition? No. Statistics? Of course!
IceAges14Aces 2 months ago
@IceAges14Aces on the contrary, i graduated from a math school, and i learnt statistics too in university, but what we talked about was irrelevant to statistics and replications, because i only told him he is fraund unless he goes to these testing companies which give u a lot of money if your claims prove right. obviously when someone is deemed to be a real psychic, a lot of statistical analysis and replications will follow to measure the boundaries of the occurance, but thats irrelevant for him
atomisten 2 months ago
@atomisten In any case, I agree with your conclusion that statistics/replications are irrelevant to his claim since his claim either happens or doesn't happen; however, I am afraid your proposition that he is a fraud because he failed to get tested is simply an argument from ignorance.....
IceAges14Aces 2 months ago
@IceAges14Aces its not that he havent got tested, he is a fraud because he is searching for excuses not to get the 1million dollar prize... this is like when someone doesn't let a policeman search his bag, obv the guy is hiding something else he would let the search done in 10sec, if u think otherwise im afraid it's only ignorance on your part.
atomisten 2 months ago
@atomisten It seems you're putting your faith in the assumption that he is a fraud simply because he supposedly made excuses instead of actually looking for substantial, empirical evidence that fully justify him as a fraud.
I hate to tell you this, but your assumption is purely discrimination.
It's going to take more than just excuses to convince me. How about finding genuine evidence against him in his videos that justify him using trickery??? That's something more believable....
IceAges14Aces 2 months ago
@IceAges14Aces lol dude you are funny, how about HIM proving us that he doesnt do any tricks, i can replicate the same occurance with this limited sight we have got from the camera angle 100times with different tricks. u just need a magnet, or wind or a very small wire (which they use in professional movies) or just a video effect trick, cutting etc. when someone wants to prove the world he is psychic through YOUTUBE, then he has no excuse not to prove it officially, unless he is a fraud.
atomisten 2 months ago
look, for all you idiots out there, there's no reason for this not to be real! i believe in God and i cant see Him but i know He's out there. You might not have a rational explanation for telekinesis but why is it so far away from belief? Just because you cant see it, or the forces acting on it, that doesnt mean its not real. Plus, if you think it isnt real then why waste your time watching videos like this?
GarlicGirlDamonLover 2 months ago
@calebandstef 17??? Wow, I'm 17 too.. HAHA! Who said I was mad??? I wasn't mad, I was just demonstrating your profound idiocy and bigotry. You call yourself a critical thinker? HAHA your ludicrously is very amusing XD!!! If you're really a thinker, you wouldn't ad hominem, e.g. blah blah don't reply, and generalize that darryl is a fraud from one of his video. Yeah, whatever man whatever....
IceAges14Aces 2 months ago
@calebandstef It's truly baffling how you failed to grasp just how rigorous and scrutinize he was in his telekinetic experiments. You just generalized that all his telekinetic videos are misleading and accussed him as fraud simply because of that video (which only an imprudent, bigoted, pseudointellectual moron would do..)
IceAges14Aces 2 months ago
Yer real smart @IceAges14Aces , do you have Asperger's?
DrChebutykin 2 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
Why are you so mad, are you crazy? :/
Serious question..
The fact that you insult me so much is just sad. I just turned 17, and you're what? 24? Take a chill pill or go smoke some dope, I mean, you clearly have nothing better to do then to pick on someone who's just trying to save some of these people's time.
Also.. It doesn't take a bunch of videos of him saying he's tricking everybody to prove he's tricking everybody.. blahhhhhh now stop replying, don't got time for this shiiii
calebandstef 2 months ago 2
...cont...You can feel the forces by putting your hands very closely together and moving them slowly...feeling....the force as your hands spread out and close back together. You have to be perceptible as the force may seem very weak until you can more readily detect it. It is not magic, everyone has it, some generate more of this force than others. Look up Qi Gong, that will help you to further understand the principles of Chi. Thumbs up for you darrylsloan.
TKRPAIN 2 months ago
This is not hard to do actually, it is harder to move it under glass for sure though. This is Chi (a form of Telekinesis). I've been doing it for a while now (no luck under glass as yet). Most of it radiates from the palms or meridians of one's hand. It feels kind of like the forces that exist when trying to put the like fields of a magnet together. You feel the force working. You hands radiate this, which in turn moves the Chi Wheel. You can control direction as well with practice...cont....
TKRPAIN 2 months ago
@TKRPAIN thats it thats what i feel. i didn't know that i can do chi now
markjason2 2 months ago
My simple question is this - if this sort of stuff is real, why isn't this man highly televised and rich, etc...? surely a man who can genuinely move things with his mind would be very high in public interest.... sick of these stupid amateur youtube vids...