The nuclear warhead fired by Atomic Annie had an explosion about the size of the Hiroshima bomb "Little Boy" - 15 kilotons ("Little Boy" was somewhere between 13 and 18 kilotons).
It's now located on Ft. Sill, Oklahoma. I saw it out of the trench, must be at least 15 feet tall and about two train engines long. The words, "Atomic Annie" are painted in white on the barrel. The rest of the cannon is painted army green.
This is interesting and cool but completely unnecessary and already obsolete for the time. A bomber could do the same job and is far more mobile and safer. Missiles were also just starting to come into their time around then as well. But hey, at least we can say we made an atomic cannon :D
An air burst trigger would have to be utilized here. the risk of fallout is much too great. 13 miles is not enough to escape the radioactive debri's thrown up upon impact.
I would be certain most of the operating crew died of cancer or other radiation related disease.
Would it be possible to get an AVI or MPG/MPEG file of this video we could show in the Broomfield Veterans memorial Museum? We have a model of this cannon and the brief video would be a great addition.
@kenotooth Your absolutely right.They would most likely be used in retaliation.Then like hiroshima and nagasaki....deep regret afterwards.Now that they are invented theres and ever growing concern that they will be used as an offensive weapon.Most likely iran.Its actually been an eye opener that russia had never used them in that manner.They seem to possess some humanitarian concern instead of what we honestly expected of them....that was savagery.
Indeed. Time should be spent on improving atomic defense, not atomic capability, which it certainly has been. It is completely unnecessary to have atomic weapons, when we are developing laser defensive technologies
@kenotooth Yes yes ...and we should drop them altogether and make a world wide effort and concentrate on developing a fuel and engine that will replace gasoline and diesel because we cannot deny any longer that they have reached the climax of thier levels.If we do not find a replacement there will be a desperation in agriculture to farm our food supply and transport to markets even just across a county.Can you imagine starvation on a scale that will panic the world?
well it was real footage. im guessing the cameras were destroyed but the film was recordedin a small station miles away.... but it would leave one to question how it captured the footage of the trees bending back. maybe theyre contained in concrete doohickeys.
carsomedan, this happened in year of 1953 and cause of some s*** happened when this bomb destroyed, i think it exploded twice as more they expected, they stopped producing atomic cannons in year of 1957, there's no way to buy new one :P
The smoke rockets were deployed right before the blast to measure its shockwave velocity. It was the scientist's only way of tracking them during that time.
Somehow I dont think dropping a few nukes is necessarily going to be the best way to go about the task of killing them off though. What about civilian deaths?
Little boy was 12 kilotons, Fat Man, far more efficient plutonium implosion weapon 22 kilotons Shot Grable-this one- delivered a 15 kiloton artillery shell,developed by Ted Taylor et al. The one unexpected feature of this test was a pre-cursor loading, which was a 500 mile per hour wind over a short area.
02:07 - There´s nothing so quiet than a loaded gun . (H.Heine)
Hardside65 3 weeks ago
wtf you wrecked a good video
Lavalambtron 1 month ago
go annie go(:
timgaylehughes 4 months ago
The nuclear warhead fired by Atomic Annie had an explosion about the size of the Hiroshima bomb "Little Boy" - 15 kilotons ("Little Boy" was somewhere between 13 and 18 kilotons).
Rickyrab 8 months ago
It's now located on Ft. Sill, Oklahoma. I saw it out of the trench, must be at least 15 feet tall and about two train engines long. The words, "Atomic Annie" are painted in white on the barrel. The rest of the cannon is painted army green.
sethzky77 8 months ago
I bet it's good for killing the weeds in the garden though eh? lol
MrCWilding 8 months ago
And they all died of cancer....
steelbrzz 10 months ago
We will all glow together when we go...
confusedCoyote 11 months ago
13 miles.. arty sucked back then. x.O
Burnz2much 11 months ago
Hookup!.. Standby!.. Fiya!.. :p miss those days allot.
Burnz2much 11 months ago
They should have used that in Iraq & Afghanistan.
ViennasNachos 1 year ago
Atomic bombs, atomic missiles, atomic guns, atomic rifles. When Cutty Ranks recorded Six Millions way to die. He wasn't joking!!
Procharmo 1 year ago
haha love the title
1pixle 1 year ago 2
This is interesting and cool but completely unnecessary and already obsolete for the time. A bomber could do the same job and is far more mobile and safer. Missiles were also just starting to come into their time around then as well. But hey, at least we can say we made an atomic cannon :D
nucleardeath07 1 year ago
An air burst trigger would have to be utilized here. the risk of fallout is much too great. 13 miles is not enough to escape the radioactive debri's thrown up upon impact.
I would be certain most of the operating crew died of cancer or other radiation related disease.
ChromiumSilver 1 year ago
@ChromiumSilver Actually the radius for fallout of a standard nuclear weapon is around 2-5 miles, you must be thinking about a Hydrogen Bomb.
riceicles123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Would it be possible to get an AVI or MPG/MPEG file of this video we could show in the Broomfield Veterans memorial Museum? We have a model of this cannon and the brief video would be a great addition.
thanks you..
Mike Fellows
michaelfellows1@msn.com
MikeFellows4575 1 year ago
This was like 60 years ago.... Just imagine now what they got at Area 51... It's creepy !
Gichnni 1 year ago
you can even see the shell being fired!! how cool is that?
MrPennyworth007 1 year ago
I'd hate to have a misfire and have the shell land 100 feet from the gun
monkeyman1140 1 year ago
Why didn't they mount this on a battleship?
thedreamdealer 1 year ago
@thedreamdealer cause the radiation would still get to the crew on the ship
MrPennyworth007 1 year ago
OMG
TextFreeley 1 year ago
holy shit ai cant hear antithing noooooooo plug your ears realy
stjepanzero 1 year ago
It is a shame that tactical nuclear weapons are banned...
melis256 1 year ago
I regret to inform you all that I have lost the original video somewhere in my vast pile of videos and will no longer be able to post the original
carsomedan 1 year ago
i saw atomic annie when i went to aberdeen
GUNNY89 1 year ago
Man, it's too bad they dont have Predator drones dropping those on AlQaida and the Taliban
ArmoredSheepdog 2 years ago
ugh...do you realize how stupid it is to even have thermonuclear weapons?
kenotooth 1 year ago
@kenotooth Your absolutely right.They would most likely be used in retaliation.Then like hiroshima and nagasaki....deep regret afterwards.Now that they are invented theres and ever growing concern that they will be used as an offensive weapon.Most likely iran.Its actually been an eye opener that russia had never used them in that manner.They seem to possess some humanitarian concern instead of what we honestly expected of them....that was savagery.
mastersduhgree 1 year ago
Indeed. Time should be spent on improving atomic defense, not atomic capability, which it certainly has been. It is completely unnecessary to have atomic weapons, when we are developing laser defensive technologies
kenotooth 1 year ago
@kenotooth Yes yes ...and we should drop them altogether and make a world wide effort and concentrate on developing a fuel and engine that will replace gasoline and diesel because we cannot deny any longer that they have reached the climax of thier levels.If we do not find a replacement there will be a desperation in agriculture to farm our food supply and transport to markets even just across a county.Can you imagine starvation on a scale that will panic the world?
mastersduhgree 1 year ago
lolol
jpongsin2002 1 year ago
There was 14 of these tests
user92126 2 years ago
ThanX for sharing this old propaganda piece on the atomic cannon.
rhetrozenberg 2 years ago
Plug my ears? Yeah, cause it was so loud....
Sweetthang9 2 years ago
Yeah, I saw this gun when I was stationed at Ft Sill. Interesting idea, but no thanks.
2Manchu70 2 years ago
while the troops when to "TAKE POSITION " in the sleep trenches there where intentionally exposed to atomic fall out,,,
nodadbad420 2 years ago
Atomic Annie is on display about to blocks from my Barracks.
smoky90210 2 years ago
A big goof on the original "Anzio Annie" rail gun that tormented the Allies during Operation Shingle.
Sierra688 2 years ago
Carsomedan You make good videos
muffinman404 2 years ago
that gun has only fired once what the video falled to say is it killed all who fired it by radiation
xRa01 2 years ago
@xRa01 What's your source?
voodoodanny 1 year ago
wtf? is this fake? a camera would survive that? or am i wrong?
schopper456 2 years ago
well it was real footage. im guessing the cameras were destroyed but the film was recordedin a small station miles away.... but it would leave one to question how it captured the footage of the trees bending back. maybe theyre contained in concrete doohickeys.
poitertoip 2 years ago
no, it's real.. they put camera into steel armour..
8kaki 2 years ago
lol 0:57 "the big gun"
riceicles123 2 years ago
what are that smoke strips near by place before and during every nuclear explosion? .....(in this video it is on right side from place of attack)
OnnomonnomonnO 2 years ago
good question, people can see it before the detonation
Zardoz1977 2 years ago
They fire little rockets up before the blast. They used the smoke trails as a visual reference to see how the shock wave traveled through the air.
proaudiohd 2 years ago
Craftsmanship used to make things to kill lots and lots of other people never ceases to amaze me. I guess not everything is made to last.
Be a real bitch if it jammed in the barrel.
ozzyscruggs1 2 years ago
Oh shit never thought of that
Boomboomboominmyroom 2 years ago
This is indeed a fucked up world!
Ecselsiour 2 years ago 2
yes it sure is
bombercat123 2 years ago
the yield was 16 kt in a 524 Foot Airburst
diegoz2009 2 years ago
Fucking gave me a hardon
speedinginmyporsche 2 years ago 2
carsomedan, this happened in year of 1953 and cause of some s*** happened when this bomb destroyed, i think it exploded twice as more they expected, they stopped producing atomic cannons in year of 1957, there's no way to buy new one :P
SAMPMoviesTFS 2 years ago 2
what was the tonnage/megatonnage of this weapon?
hrdknox2000 2 years ago
i can see the cannon as it went out
JRYANG9000 2 years ago
I have seen this gun, it is on display at the US Army Field Artillery Museum at Fort Sill Oklahoma.
KC0TCH 2 years ago
hm, i cannot see any effect of the shockwave on these smokeflares?!?!
etranger84 2 years ago
yes there is an effect on the smoke and those rocket trails, you can see that they are moved a few hundred feet due to the shock wave.
Nuker1337 2 years ago
my favorite part of the movie is when the guy says THE BIG GUN 0:58
carsomedan 2 years ago
Comment removed
porthpatho78 2 years ago
Does anybody know what the little smoke columns on the left side at 2:45 are?
kofkok 2 years ago
*edit* I mean right side. sorry Im dyxlesic
kofkok 2 years ago
They are smoke rockets for scaling purposes I'm pretty sure.
1200strong 2 years ago
The smoke rockets were deployed right before the blast to measure its shockwave velocity. It was the scientist's only way of tracking them during that time.
bluemonster7754 2 years ago
Thank you for explaining that. I have always wondered what those were for.
kofkok 2 years ago
Yes. They are smoke flares that are used to measure blast radius and other things. You will often see them in videos of nuclear tests/
DangerousSociopath 2 years ago
Thanks.
kofkok 2 years ago
Dust a few of these Mark VIIII shells off and use them in Iraq and bring our boys home.
PepperWhite62 3 years ago
Bill O'Reilly visits Youtube?
porthpatho78 2 years ago
What's your plan? To negotiate with Al Quieda?
PepperWhite62 2 years ago
Isolate them by reengaging with the youth they usually recruit from.
porthpatho78 2 years ago
Interesting concept but it's neccesary to kill to win war.
PepperWhite62 2 years ago
Somehow I dont think dropping a few nukes is necessarily going to be the best way to go about the task of killing them off though. What about civilian deaths?
A
porthpatho78 2 years ago
That's got to be the nastiest mushroom cloud of all the tests! :eek:
marmaloon 3 years ago
no Castle Bravo is :)
ExperimentalArmy 3 years ago
You have your favourite; I have mine.
marmaloon 3 years ago
just imagine an atomic artillery barrage that would really demoralize the enemy
LukasM86 3 years ago
That relly would be a scary thing. BUT COOL!!!
carsomedan 3 years ago
@carsomedan And today the actual artillery guns can firer nuclear heads.
metalkat77 1 year ago
I'm sure they won't feel a thing
antkiller13 3 years ago
@LukasM86 i think thatll do a little more than just demoralize them, haha
Fredman5551 1 year ago
@Fredman5551 yeah it would be more like vaporize them. haha
LukasM86 1 year ago
Fking awesome! That 280 mm Mark 3 delivered the same explosive force as Fat Man (Nagasaki) or Little Boy (Hiroshima).
1polonium210 3 years ago
Little boy was 12 kilotons, Fat Man, far more efficient plutonium implosion weapon 22 kilotons Shot Grable-this one- delivered a 15 kiloton artillery shell,developed by Ted Taylor et al. The one unexpected feature of this test was a pre-cursor loading, which was a 500 mile per hour wind over a short area.
ralucagymnast 3 years ago
oh shit, dem niggas are fucked
i hate chad hoffman, hack his computer
drumerdude5656 3 years ago
I have seen Atomic Annie at the US Army Field Artillery Museum at Fort Sill Oklahoma.
She is beautifull.
KC0TCH 3 years ago
dude, this is awesome, not gunna lie =]]]
drumerdude5656 3 years ago