Haha this is nuts! Something like 500 roentgen an hour is lethal dose. So let's say they were next to the base of the reactor for 5mins, that is ~83 roentgen. Although exposure doesn't directly equate into dose absorption, I'm interested to know approx how many gray per year they received.
Oh nothing much, just looking at the lava flow from the base of the reactor. It's pretty cool huh? Notice how the base was pushed down 4m - hmmm interesting.
proof that the element with the most boring (pun intended) name can save the world. Boric acid is the supressor used. Oh, and it does miracles with swimmers ear too.
Your question has me thinking: why not also use a long hose (for safety) to spray petroleum oil in the area around the reactor lid to suppress the amount of radioactive dust should it fall? They could then try to install airtight doors to retard the movement of the excess dust. Has that idea been considered?
Why didn't they mention the prevention of the second steam explosion that may have been caused by the "lava" meeting the "bubbler" pool (no joke) hm, prehaps it was a bit too "gruesome" for prime time T.V. (if any one is intrested just reply and ill be happy to fill you in)
no i was re-ferring to the "lava" that came dangerously close to entering the pool that supplyed water for the emergancy pumps had it done so there would have been a second steam explosion the only way to prevent this was by emptying the pool unfortunately the controls for the sluce gate where immersed in radioactive water, three vouleteers in no more than diving suits swam through the irradiated water and managed to open the gates however they never re-turned to the surface it is thought that..
I'll be visiting Chernobyl next Spring, there's a tour leaving Kiev 6 days a week that takes you to the site and the neighboring deserted city of Pripyat. It should be an experience.
Morbid as it may seem, if I were on vacation in Russia, I wouldn't hesitate to take a very quick tour around Pripyat or Chernobyl. BUT I ain't staying longer than I need to!
The reactor is fueled by enriched U-235. During the process of nuclear fission, however, several new elements such as Plutonium, Cesium, Americium, etc. are created as byproducts. PU-239 is created when U-238 absorbs a neutron, becomes U-239, beta decays into Np-239, and then finally beta decays into PU-239.
Are you sure? One of the advantages of the RBMK reactor design is that it can run on natural urainium and did not need en-riched urainium (or "heavy" water for that matter) so why would it be used?
No reactor design can operate using non-enriched Urainum, which naturally contains 99.3% U238 and 0.7% U235. The U235 concentration must be enriched to about 3%-5% before it can be used for fuel.
U238 is technically fissionable, but does not support a spontaneous, self-sustaining reaction. A Mixture of U238 & U235 at 96% & 94% concentrations, respectively, is ideal for a self-sustaining reaction.
Because the U-238 is present in large quantities within an operational reactor, it naturally is exposed to heavy neutron bombardment. As a result, some of the U238 ends up absorbing a neutron, becoming U239, which is a short-lived isotope that quickly decays into Np-239, and then finally in PU-239.
One of the greatest dangers of reactors nearing the end of their fuel cycle is that they contain large concentrations of extremely hazardous by-product chemicals of the fission process (such as PU239).
Unfortunately, Chernobyl has more than half way through it's fuel cycle when the reactor exploded.
Haha this is nuts! Something like 500 roentgen an hour is lethal dose. So let's say they were next to the base of the reactor for 5mins, that is ~83 roentgen. Although exposure doesn't directly equate into dose absorption, I'm interested to know approx how many gray per year they received.
northroad1 5 months ago
Scientist have brass balls and are some crazy mother fuckers, bless them and what they do!!
4624tone 10 months ago
You must have balls for doing this messy job. Respect to those big balled people.
crogeek 10 months ago
"It's 1000 Roentgen here! What are you up to?"
Oh nothing much, just looking at the lava flow from the base of the reactor. It's pretty cool huh? Notice how the base was pushed down 4m - hmmm interesting.
GET THE F*** OUT OF THERE GUYS!!!!!!
myrtlebox 10 months ago 5
@myrtlebox
Exactly!!
505JAM505 5 months ago
great job cutting corners. take another look at how you handled transition from part 4 to part 5.
autentyk 10 months ago
they only need to make a structure that will last 100,000 years
Not a problem!
myrtlebox 10 months ago
@wircolac
Mark your words!
kANDzInS 10 months ago
@wircolac More accurately, what happened in the cold war.
May we never make the mistake of designing another nuclear reactor JUST for the sake of depleting nuclear fuel to weapons-grade.
ESAPOWER 1 year ago 2
"The inside of the sarcophagus is starting to fall down."
And this is way back in 1991. Just picture it today, 2010. They must build a new stronger sarcophagus around this one at ALL costs!
TheBoomViper 1 year ago 3
proof that the element with the most boring (pun intended) name can save the world. Boric acid is the supressor used. Oh, and it does miracles with swimmers ear too.
TheCaptainLulz 1 year ago
WTF, those scientists had Enormous Atomic Balls, to do a job like that!!!!
Cab0cl0 1 year ago 4
I am blown away with what little protection the scientists have. You would think they would resemble astronauts
Crisgo3d 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Russians just weren't anywhere smart enough to build something like this.
The place should have been sealed from the start. The holes should certainly have been sealed up 5 years later at the very least.
Digitalbumpin 2 years ago
the soviet union will rise again!
Nathantok7 2 years ago
@Nathantok7 ...and what goes up, must come down. again.
TheTomyossarian 1 year ago
The Chernobyl facility was among the safest in the world, it was the human error in the control room that lead to the problem.
Don't act like you're some kind of expert on constructing nuclear reactors.
Gezab 1 year ago 3
They should hermetically seal that place.
Jemalacane 2 years ago
I'm going to be using these videos for my next topic in science since we're going to be learning about the bad effects of radiation.
matdoomn 2 years ago
Chelyabinsk
TOMMYTRADDLES 2 years ago
"Built in great haste." I would hope that they would not have piddely squacked around building it!
magicmaker15 2 years ago
One question I have though is, where were there open ended tubes under the reactor, that allowed the lava to spill into those rooms?
GunsOfThePhoenix 2 years ago
I can't help but wonder if anyone was under the reactor at the time and got hit by the reactor fuel as it flowed through the lower levels.
Detonater 2 years ago
There was no one reported under the reactor at the time of the fatal test. There was 1 person next to the reactor, but he escaped.
GunsOfThePhoenix 2 years ago
I didn't know that they could go into that building.
spazchickens 2 years ago 2
Im surprised that all these years later the some of the lava was still hot and steaming.
ExperimentalArmy 2 years ago 5
1:32 DO A BARREL ROLL!!!
retards1ayer23 2 years ago
1:37 shows a sexy leg as well
spazchickens 2 years ago
question? why not employ petrolium oil as a dust supressant? It does not evaporate and wont add to any radioactivity.
Perditionswrath 3 years ago
And if it catches on fire???
argonne5 2 years ago
Your question has me thinking: why not also use a long hose (for safety) to spray petroleum oil in the area around the reactor lid to suppress the amount of radioactive dust should it fall? They could then try to install airtight doors to retard the movement of the excess dust. Has that idea been considered?
starlionblue 2 years ago 2
Why didn't they mention the prevention of the second steam explosion that may have been caused by the "lava" meeting the "bubbler" pool (no joke) hm, prehaps it was a bit too "gruesome" for prime time T.V. (if any one is intrested just reply and ill be happy to fill you in)
Dodershift 3 years ago
Are you perhaps referring to the "mining expedition" which occurred under the reactor in an attempt to install a liquid Nitrogen cooling device?
stephendonnelly88 3 years ago
no i was re-ferring to the "lava" that came dangerously close to entering the pool that supplyed water for the emergancy pumps had it done so there would have been a second steam explosion the only way to prevent this was by emptying the pool unfortunately the controls for the sluce gate where immersed in radioactive water, three vouleteers in no more than diving suits swam through the irradiated water and managed to open the gates however they never re-turned to the surface it is thought that..
Dodershift 3 years ago
. one of the men died before reaching the controls and the light that they had been given failed leaving them to feel there way along a pipe
Dodershift 3 years ago
how the heck did they get a lid so freaken huge on there?
scorpionexo400 3 years ago
I'll be visiting Chernobyl next Spring, there's a tour leaving Kiev 6 days a week that takes you to the site and the neighboring deserted city of Pripyat. It should be an experience.
belfastsamurai 3 years ago 4
Be sure to take many pictures and videos for us :)
xxhaloownerxx 3 years ago 2
That would be my intentions. :-)
stephendonnelly88 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
don't eat any fruit
IronbreakerFTW 3 years ago
Morbid as it may seem, if I were on vacation in Russia, I wouldn't hesitate to take a very quick tour around Pripyat or Chernobyl. BUT I ain't staying longer than I need to!
starlionblue 2 years ago 4
@starlionblue its not in Russia mate, its in Ukraine.
weesparky08 2 years ago 7
So I'm guessing all these scientists died shortly there-after?
r32adt3db 3 years ago
Many have already died. Those who remain alive will be at high risk for developing a terminal illness in the near future.
stephendonnelly88 3 years ago
wtf? plutonium? i thought chernobyl only contained uranium Oo
XxkutaapxX 3 years ago
The reactor is fueled by enriched U-235. During the process of nuclear fission, however, several new elements such as Plutonium, Cesium, Americium, etc. are created as byproducts. PU-239 is created when U-238 absorbs a neutron, becomes U-239, beta decays into Np-239, and then finally beta decays into PU-239.
stephendonnelly88 3 years ago
Are you sure? One of the advantages of the RBMK reactor design is that it can run on natural urainium and did not need en-riched urainium (or "heavy" water for that matter) so why would it be used?
Dodershift 3 years ago
^ directed at stephens re-sponse to Xxkutaapxx
|
Dodershift 3 years ago
No reactor design can operate using non-enriched Urainum, which naturally contains 99.3% U238 and 0.7% U235. The U235 concentration must be enriched to about 3%-5% before it can be used for fuel.
U238 is technically fissionable, but does not support a spontaneous, self-sustaining reaction. A Mixture of U238 & U235 at 96% & 94% concentrations, respectively, is ideal for a self-sustaining reaction.
stephendonnelly88 3 years ago
Because the U-238 is present in large quantities within an operational reactor, it naturally is exposed to heavy neutron bombardment. As a result, some of the U238 ends up absorbing a neutron, becoming U239, which is a short-lived isotope that quickly decays into Np-239, and then finally in PU-239.
stephendonnelly88 3 years ago
One of the greatest dangers of reactors nearing the end of their fuel cycle is that they contain large concentrations of extremely hazardous by-product chemicals of the fission process (such as PU239).
Unfortunately, Chernobyl has more than half way through it's fuel cycle when the reactor exploded.
stephendonnelly88 3 years ago
*EDIT CORRECTION:
94% should be 4% in the above comment...
stephendonnelly88 3 years ago
@stephendonnelly88 Your reactor theory isn't quite up to par. CANDU reactors can run using natural uranium.
dbcooper972 1 year ago
Wow, bless them for doing such dangerous missions. I don't think I could do that.
MsMercury 4 years ago 23
that place looks spooky as hell at night. :-\
jacko39 4 years ago 5
That place looks spooky as hell at any time of the day mate.
Hemo443 4 years ago 5
i imagine it is.
jacko39 4 years ago 2
Try this on Internet Explorer and this will show all the video
DuoLawrence 4 years ago
2:52 lol
enian 4 years ago