Added: 2 years ago
From: DebateCrusher
Views: 1,158
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (126)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Was Venomfag over 20 years old? Shawn is a corrupt religious nut. Who knows how much money he stole from his fake charity and ministry. Everybody in this video want shawn to get help. He is clearly mentally ill.

  • Surprise surprise, ratings disabled for a wack-job video. DPR corrupts teenage (or mid-twenties) boys (or men)! Batboy joins the military! Aliens are reading your thoughts, prepare your tinfoil hats! Just because it isn't real, and things didn't actually happen that way doesn't mean you can't get outraged about it.

  • Dude quit making fun of thunderfoot. He has 100 times the patience I would have dealing with creationists.

    I found this part funny:

    Venomfangx - I am shutting down this ministry

    Translation - I am going from a kid making youtube videos to a kid who doesn't make youtube videos

  • Shawn got what he deserved. He was indeed an idiot on youtube.

  • PCS isn't just a boy.

  • you cry like a girl

  • So Shawn urges others to report DPRJones based on false accusations of paedophilia.

    But the big deal is that TF called him an idiot?!

  • @cristop5 ... dc is to nutcases what ted bundy is to serial killers

  • Last time I checked, 24 is 'grown-up'... Shawn is a (mentally ill) adult, not some poor helpless kid.

  • Wait, so you're saying you'd rather see Shawn get sued? That's awfully nice of you!

  • DPR did not give away Shawns personal information, nor did he encourage anyone to harass him. He specifically told people to leave Shawn alone while this was going on.

  • When did he say that? do you have any proof that DPR gave Shawns personal info to others with the intent to harass him?

  • how is asking for proof of DPR asking people to harass Shawn the same as casting a stone at him? either he did say it or he didn't, which is it?

  • I never agreed with

    VenomFangX he is a turd.................But this is a Fuckin Lynch Mob of self-righteous CUNTs

  • Shawn is 24 years old............You retard!

    Shawn is mentally ill, and getting the help that he needs. Thanks to dprjones!

    dprjones cut him a break, the alternative is prison.

    Shawn is a criminal.

    You don't get this DebateCrusher??

    Do you still think that Shawn is a champion of Jesus?

    I don't think that Jesus would say that lying stealing and slander is right.

    And those are the actions of Shawn, your hero!

  • No, DPR and TF ridiculed and made fun of Shawn and I won't cut them any slack. They are irresponsible adults.

  • So no creationist is a sinner even when they steal from Sick Kids charity hospital? and we know from Kent Hovid that breaking tax laws and then lieing about it isn't a sin your eyes, and DRP will always be evil to you for being a heretic even if he exercises christian mercy instead of using the full weight of the law that DPR could've used if he wanted to. Well keep it up creationists with any luck you'll shame Christianity out of the world.

  • Isent Shawn in his 20's?

  • @Jesse2K12  shawn is 24

  • You weren't invited to comment here, and DPR is an adult lawyer who is pestering a person that is younger than him. DPR harps on VFX for spamming Youtube because it's against Youtube policy, yet he does something far worse in getting a girl to take her top off on blogtv (which is against blogtv rules. When I brought this up on FVR's blogtv i was kicked.

  • @DebateFighter

    21 is old enough to drink alcohol, smoke tobacco, vote, join the military, enter a contract, drive, go to college, get a job and yet Shawn, who is 24, is too young to take responsibility for his own actions?

  • That's not how I see it. I see it as a grown old man who happens to be a lawyer calling a young man (who just put on youtube videos) an idiot and was threatening him with a lawsuit while trying to humilate him on Youtube and badgering him on other sites as well.

  • @DebateFighter You were blocked for being a perverted stalker dc.... Stop telling lies

  • Why "DPRJones corrupts teenage boys".

    How has he ever corrupted Shawn? I mean they're trying to help him realizing that he has issues problems. Shawn has made stupid decisions and videos on his own.

  • I love how You sound like a child saying he did this and he said that and and and! Pcs is terrible with no regard for reason. All on you tube that have seen this battle played out over the years know his scary psychotic rants. We know DPRJones has fine reasoning. At least you allow comments. Witch oddly is the only thing good about your channel.

  • I find it odd that this vid points out so many times the PCS is under threat of lawsuit. Get this through your heads: HE DID SOMETHING ILLEGAL. Hes damn lucky Dprjones didnt sue him. Expecially since this isnt the first time it's happened

  • My heart was lifted when I watched DPRJones' video: "A message...Shawn and his father" It is nice to hear people coming to a remarkably amicable agreement after some period of animosity.

    What is the point of this video? Are you suggesting that Shawn's father was lying, or coerced into saying what he did?

  • My heart wasn't lifted. See what is happening is that DPR is happy. A very happy man. He is happy that VFX is gone. VFX is gone. And if DPR and TF had come to an amicable agreement he would have invited VFX to stay and provide a compelling reason to keep him on Youtube, but he had not. So it's all fake.

  • They were gloating at their perceived victory and decided to cane VFX in public as a warning to all others who would dare challenge their power.

    Well guess what......some of us aren't intimidated by these unemployed retards.

    ;)

  • Which is why my videos are delivering a public caning.

  • But you just know they won't take their caning with the same level of humility and respect as VFX undoubtedly did.

  • Would you invite 3rd graders to a lecture by Richard Feynman?

  • DebateFighter has written a PM to "remind" me that we should rebuke a brother in private before expressing our concerns in public.

    Sorry for the misunderstanding. I have written to DebateCrusher 3 times in the past on this same issue. He seems to have no problems bearing false witness against other people, whether Christian or not. His only criterion is that he must be "lying for Jesus."

    It's not right and it's not something Christians can condone.

  • When NephillimFreeFree says it's not right and nobody should condone it, he means to say, I am a more refiner Christianity than you. Take for what it's worth, he and Yoke-up are of the same category. Provokers and public disputers - bringing shame upon us all. I don't criticize other Christians for what they do, but I'm sure NFF wants atheists to be saved so much that he has to recklessly not mind his business.

  • " I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves." - Matt 10:16 (NIV)

    I'd stick to psuedo-Science if i were you and leave Biblical interpretation to those of us who really understand the true message contained therein.

    When Atheists quote the Bible they always come across as spiritual vacuums...their words hold no gravitas.

  • You give the same gravitas to "See Spot Run"

  • Typical DebateCrusher style... Let's not worry AT ALL about what the truth is, right? DebateCrusher loves Christ SO MUCH that he is willing to lie (even lie stupidly) to support Christ.

    Forget the fact that Christ reminded his follows NOT to bear false witness against others. Christ was quite clear, but DebateCrusher hasn't read that part.

    This video misrepresents both dprjones and Shawn. It makes them both look pathetic. It is unfair false witness against each.

  • Actually, this video in NO way misrepresents any of the parties. In fact, if I am bearing false witness I ask, in what way. You have made no points but made accusations.

    FACT: DPRJones told people to give him a call and see how they could deal with Shawn outside of Paypal. FACT: Shawn was acting under a perceived lawsuit threat. FACT: DPR, in no way, asked Shawn to stay on Youtube.

  • @DebateFighter: "...perceived lawsuit threat."

    Oh, the risk of lawsuit was quite real. First, UK libel laws are far reaching -- Canada is within the domain of application. Second, Shawn committed aggravated defamatory libel when he falsely claimed that dprjones was a pedophile. Check out the Criminal Code of Canada... 5 years in jail!

    So I agree that Shawn was under some stress here. You should agree that he brought it on himself when he lied.

  • You actually need me to outline where your lies are? You actually don't know when you're lying?? That's weird.

    There are about 5 comments here pointing out your lies about dprjones. He never suggested the penny-donating thing, he never gave out Shawn's info, he never "put Shawn's family under threat." (Don't you believe it was the Muslims who did that anyway??)

    Shawn had to make tough choices under difficult circumstances. He has come out honestly now, and you call him a liar. Nice.

  • I asked him about that on his blogtv. Now you ask DPRJones just exactly as to what he was asking his followers to do when he asked them to call him in regard to Shawn's other, outside of Youtube account. Then define to me what DPRJones meant when he asked as to why people hate Shawn. Are you a long age earth person, by the way, and allowing that to skew your judgement?

  • good video.

  • I have a further question for you, how is the title of this video correct? Shawn is in his 20's...

  • Apparently you hadn't watched the whole video because that is explained in the video.

  • You're right, I haven't watched it the whole way through. However, when I watched what I watched (after you sent it to me), the video was titled differently, so I just wondered.

  • Troll.

  • You are a fool for actually believing in this video and uploading it.

    Shawn was under threat from a lawsuit because of his false DMCAs remember?

  • Shawn was being provoked by Thunderfoot and DPR, both who were using his videos.

  • Doesn't matter once you break the law, you have to face the consequences, which in this case would have been quite severe if dprjones chose to do so.

  • DPR was advocating very questionable activities, such as donating pennies to Shawn's Paypal account and getting his personal information.

  • Bullcrap, Dprjones was only advocating activities such as donating pennies to Shawns paypal account to stop shawn from scamming his audience, and he never ever advocated getting a hold of someones personal information, Shawn however gave out dprjones personal information....

  • That crook, DPR. I donated to VFX's Paypal account and watched all the videos that VFX made in regard to it. VFX kept his word and was on campus doing what I wanted him to do with my money, and he did donate to a charity. Who are you but an atheist barging into our business?

  • I am much more than an atheist. When you upload a video filled with garbage expect criticism. This is youtube, if you can't handle the heat stay out of the kitchen...

  • @TheKitch2

    To clarify, it was not dprjones who discussed donating pennies to Shawn's PayPal.

    Last year, a user (NOT dprjones) wanted to show how easy it was to get Shawn's info -- Shawn spread it himself quite freely. As an example, this user donated a penny and received the info.

    The user later said that he was not encouraging this conduct, only demonstrating that it could be done. Believe him or don't...

    But this had NOTHING to do with dprjones. DebateCrusher is lying.

  • thanks for enlightening me!

    Not surprised DebateCrusher is lying...

  • That video that DPRJones made, where he told his followers about Shawn's videos, -those on another site, to which Shawn received revenue for each hit on his video - and at the conclusion DPR asked his followers to call him to see what they could do about it, now tell me - answer the two questions: 1. Why was DPRJones referring to Shawn's videos OUTSIDE of Youtube 2. And why the secrecy? Why call DPR for the scoop. OK, don't tell me about the crook that DPR is.

  • So DebateCrusher... That's a "no," right? You're saying you have little zero proof that dprjones either (1) encouraged users to donate pennies or (2) had anything to do with distributing Shawn's information.

    All we have are your half-baked allegations. In fact, there is ample evidence that dprjones took steps to ensure that Shawn's info did NOT get out.

    You say (without proof) that dprjones offered to speak privately with people about Shawn. Even if true, how does your accusation follow??

  • @DebateCrusher: "DPR was advocating very questionable activities, such as donating pennies to Shawn's Paypal account and getting his personal information."

    I will send $100 to Shawn's legal defense fund (which he still has on his website) IF you can provide the slightest proof to back up either accusation. I will donate $500 if you can prove both claims.

    No, DebateCrusher, you are lying again. I know exactly what you're referring to here, and you know as well as anybody that it was NOT dpr.

  • You're upset that Frank'sVoice wasn't invited to the Skype conversation?

    Frank is no party to the legal proceedings.

  • Neither was FactVsReligion.

  • LordCustos3: "Frank is no party to the legal proceedings."

    AmazingAnswers: "Neither was FactVsReligion."

    Yes, FactVsReligion was a party to the proceedings. You would need to know more about the story of the DMCA claims to know why this is the case.

    Suffice to say that DebateCrusher is not the best source of information on this story. He has a little problem with the truth.

  • Thanks Frank. I really enjoy your videos.

  • These anti-theistic fundamentalists fulfill every end-time Prophecy in the Bible.

    "As in the Days of Noah"

    "Violence Filled the Earth"

    GOD bless!!!

  • Shawn made his bed and now he has to sleep in it...

  • Thunderfoot the anticensorship freak censored this video as a response!

  • As a response to what? And why should I care?

  • Nobody says you have to care.

  • Then why tell me?

  • Fundamentalist Christians are amoral.

  • And atheists are moral? DPRJones told his followers to donate a penny to VFX and obtain his personal information, thus putting his family under threat.

  • "DPRJones told his followers to donate a penny to VFX and obtain his personal information"

    Even if that were true (which I seriously doubt), how is that any different then Shawn/IslamIsaCancer filing a DMCA just to get a persons personal info so they could deliberately drop doc's on them?

  • It's what happened. LordHaythor carried out the Youtube message.

  • Thunderfoot blocked this video as a response. He claims freedom from censorship for himself yet allows.

  • I would feel sympathy for you if your video was some way intelligent.....

  • He has the right to not accept video responses. Nothing to do with freedom of speech.

    People can still find this video. It's not censored in any way.

    The maker of this video just needs to make better videos.

    Not this kinda shitty videos with DPRjones in the title and trying to make it a video response to TF's video. It's just whoring out views.

  • This video is an informative video, and it informs.

  • "I'm Shawn and I mistakenly filed a DMCA claim ...."

    Mistakenly?

    I this the best that you can do for Christianity? Tell lies? And you wonder why Christianity is in decline?!

  • VFX is a retard.

  • DPRJones told his followers to donate one penny to Shawn's Paypal account to obtain his personal information.

  • great vid crusher

  • Why is Shaaaawn the Only One using the Word ............."SORRY"??!! HAHAHAHA!!! Play by the ZooTube Rules...or....GTF OUT OF THE SANDBOX!!! (contact with Police??!! How about contact with MentalHealth!!!)

  • Contacting Shawn's father - telling people to donate one penny to get Shawn's personal information - is all out of Youtube guidelines.

  • The "donate a penny" trick was to deplete the paypal account (every donation includes a .33 cent charge baked in)

    How many times do you have to be reminded that the paypal account was being used for defrauding a children's hospital?

  • You did a pretty good job in trying to make Shawn look like an innocent child. We all know that Shawn is neither a child nor innocent. Also, both TF and DPR dropped the DMCA cases against Shawn and made a video asking all others DMCAd by Shawn to drop it and let VFX go. Did you not see that? Research is a good thing.

  • Shawn is contending with an old man who can't be sued because he lives in another country, and who takes Shawn's videos out of context - trying to make Shawn's humor look like arrogance - purposely editing out the part where Shawn donated $500 to a charity and making it look like Shawn is greedy - yes, I'm tired of liar extraordinaire DPRJones.

  • "trying to make Shawn's humor look like arrogance...."

    So his idea of humor is....Mocking amputees and stealing from sick kids? HILARIOUS! I guess the only thing funnier than ripping off a cancer ward or laughing at the disabled is inspiring a murder-suicide pact....for the LULZ!

  • "DPRJones encouraged atheists to work against Shawn's other activities (outside of Youtube)"

    You mean, thwart Shawn's attempt to defraud Sick Kid's Hospital?

    Remember: All it takes for Evil to Triumph is for Good Men to do Nothing.

    Shawn defrauded a children's hospital. Thats not the behavior of a decent human being....that's the behavior of a Captain Planet villain.

  • You need to be taken into custody, LordCustos. It's pointless to discuss the Sick Kids because Shawn only mentioned it once in his early video, and nobody even remembers that. But he did mention giving to charities over and over again. And he did, right on youtube. By not mentioning this fact you make it look like Shawn was greedy.

  • Can't be sued? Why not?

  • TF is a hypocrite that blocks.

  • shawn is insane, his "followers" don't care and neither do I. Get over it.

  • Why are the ratings disabled? This video sucked.

  • This video is just part of a video that "sucked" in the first place. Why didn't you try to rate the original video with a one star? THis video is much more interesting because I just added graphics. So are you a hypocrite?

  • A hypocrite? Where did you get that from? Haha, amusing...

  • From you hypocritical atheists.

  • interesting theory, but i doubt he'd risk it...

  • How am I being hypocritical? Sure, the audio is the same, but the commentary (which is not on the original) is balls. Why would it be hypocritical to give it 1 star? Why do you act like such a child?

  • "Why would it be hypocritical to give it 1 star?"

    Because your one-star makes baby Jebus cry.

    "Why do[[es DebateFighter|Crusher]] act like such a child?"

    Try to sympathize with his hopeless position, if he congregates with freethinkers, he might damage his faith, but if he fails to convert freethinkers, he fails to gather enough "brownie points" to earn him a place in heaven.

    He's literally damned if does and damned if he doesn't.

  • You don't earn a place in heaven.  Christ earned it for you.

  • I wonder if your angery because it was DPR and T'F who reached out to Shawn and not you and all the other Christians here on YouTube.

  • IF DPR and TF were on the up and up SHAWN WOULD STILL BE HERE. THEY DIDN'T REACH OUT. THEY DID NOT TELL SHAWN TO STAY. DON'T LIE TO ME.

    THREAT TO CENSOR.

  • @AmazingAnswers Shawn was the one who was trying to censor DPR with dmc's!

  • Because DPR and TF were humiliating him with videos that misrepresented his position. I KNOW SO because I watched his videos.

  • @DebateCrusher So because someone calls him names, that gives him the right to lie, cheat and steal?

  • VFX donated $500 to a charity right on a video. DPRJones misrepresented VFX to make it look like he kept the money to himself.

  • @AmazingAnswers Do you think Shawn was completely honest about the money?

  • Absolutely. I watched every video concerning this issue and DPR took Shawn's videos (carefully selected clips) and edited out the part where Shawn donated $500 to a charity. DPR dishonestly made it look like Shawn was greedy.

  • @AmazingAnswers HAHA!! Atheists DewNOT have Tew Save Xtians Fer Eternity!! Atheists KNOW Xtians are ALREADY DOOMED TEW DIE!! (xtiansdewnotunderstandthisfac­t.....becauseitisscientificall­ydiscerned!!)

  • AmazingAnswers When I hear Shawn and his father talking on this post it sure sounds like some good has come out of this.

  • What good. Shawn isn't on youtube anymore. Why? Because Thunderfoot and DPR took his videos and made Shawn look stupid. Shawn tried to get those removed. That was a mistake. So to avoid a lawsuit Shawn left Youtube, and I wanted him to stay and DPR and TF are happy about it. They win we lose and they cheated.

  • @AmazingAnswers Don't you think that Shawn made himself look stupid?

  • So did DPR and TF.

  • Why is it so hard to belive that something good has come out of this? Why do you have to continue to hate? Why can't you let it go?

  • @barrysprouse1 Nothing good came out of this. The video DPR made was done to make DPR and TF look good. Thunderfoot has not deleted his hate videos therefore nothing good has come out of this.

  • I think you should open a dictionary, look up what the word 'hate' actually means then rethinking this idiotic statement you have made.

    Thunderfoot might have been harsh towards VFX for oh...bastardizing science, misrpresenting Atheists, parroting that asswipe hovind, but hate? think again.

  • Oh no, TF hates Shawn. And he's a dishonest man.

  • Really? Prove it.

    And prove that he's dishonest.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more