humans of planet earth invented everything. so shut the fuck up and stop arguing. People like you guys that argue about shit like this are just are fucking ridiculous. STFU!!!!!!!!
@MCroxxie14 "No human life was lost in the collapse of the bridge. However, a small dog perished after it was abandoned in a car on the bridge by its owner, Leonard Coatsworth, and by another man, both of whom were bitten by the terrified dog when they attempted to remove it." Tacoma Narrows Bridge - Wikipedia
@PUDGERIFIC "Ha typical American engineering! Don't even know the basics of building a bridge"
Really? If this bridge were British engineering it would have fallen apart on the second day. You guys still can't even make a reliable car, half way descent airplanes - or a reliable anything for that matter! You still use QFE altimeter settings in parts of your country, you drive on the wrong side of the road relative to just about every other country. I haven't even scratched the surface here!
@jumboJetPilot we can make a reliable car aston martins are reliable morgans are reliable we have reliable planes e.g airbus and we drive on the proper side of the road because when they did jousting and that you needed your right hand closer to the other person so it carried on from that and whats wrong with the QFE altimeter
1. You have to pay between US $75,000 to $400,000 to get a reliable car! How about the reliability of your lesser expensive cars, like Jaguar, the least reliable car maker in the world?
2. Airbus is a European conglomerate, not just British - you can't take credit for that.
3. I'm glad you think driving on the left hand side of the road is better - because the rest of the world doesn't see it that way.
4. When using QFE there is significantly greater room for error (continued)...
@jumboJetPilot Americans make a reliable car most of the cars that Anerica make can't even go round corners and 400,000 dollars for a car that America made when has a British person done that also stop living in the seventies Jaguar is a reliable company making reliable cars now.
4. When using QFE there is significantly greater room for error which greatly increases the possibility of "Controlled Flight Into Terrain" (CFIT for short). Many airplanes have crashed in years past from misinterpreting altimeter information due to QFE. That's why it's not used anywhere except certain parts of England and a handful of the various Russian states - and the various former Soviet countries aren't exactly a good mark for aircraft safety to mirror.
5. Let's not forget that the very computer you are using to type your messages here on YouTube is American technology. Who do you think developed the computer? We did! We also developed the vast majority of telecommunications systems in use worldwide today.
6. There's a reason why so many other countries around the world have adopted US engineering and safety standards - and that's because we've set ourselves apart, compared to the rest of the world, in this regard.
@jumboJetPilot Ah, another Britain vs America youtube argument, well let the games begin!
Well first of buddy, please remind me with your superior American mind which bridge we ever built that collapsed in two days? ummm..ahhh..ummm nope sorry cant think of one. Oh, you know that really tall bridge in France? look it um on your magnificent invention wikipedia! Anyway, WE desgined it, let me just check on wikipedia if its collappsed-umm noo umm ahhhh umm nope still there sorry bud wrong there
Ok, so you inventedd youtube, my entire country salutes you. Congractulations, you've saved 7 billion people from considering killing themselves in brief moment of boredom. Youtube my god! well sure as hell makes the steam engine look like crap! God you tube eh...PRAISE VIACOM! Oh and do me a favour, get your phone, your proberbly American phone and prize it open, the microchips that are in ALL phones are actually british!
@glitch4465 I've been getting my Boeing 747-400 type rating and have been too busy for silly arguments.
Maybe YOUR phone's microchips are made in Britain. Mine certainly aren't. I have an iPhone. Designed by the engineers at Apple and made in China under exclusive contract.
Since you brought telephones, I have two personal friends of mine that are brothers, Spence and Seth Bell, whose great, great, great grandfather was Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone; and very much American!
MY phone's microchips and many other all over the world are infact developed by a firm in Cambridge, which has recently been given a large contract by *oh god hold your breath* Microsoft to supply componets for the new Windows 8 soft and hardware. By 2015 it will have 23% global market share in microprocessors in all the worlds computers. So no, not just Britain. Sorry about that.
So um about that, you can thank me later for us getting your phone to work in what I assume is going to be an obnoxious, loud U-S-A!!! bellowing reply.
So well done, you have successfully demostrated that without Uncle Sam our pitiful race will still be in the dark ages. PRAISE OBAMA, I mean, what the hell do you want me to do? Storm Buckingham Palace wearing northing but the Stars and Stripes? Please.
1. You're not going to hear me preaching to anyone about what a wonderful country and people the United States is/are. However, I give credit where and to whom it is due, regardless of where they are from. For you to come along and blast all of American technology on the account of a single bridge, long before the engineering mechanics behind it were understood, makes you look like an ignorant fool, regardless of where you are from.
@jumboJetPilot I didn't blast all American technology on a single bridge, I have absoloutley no recolection of doing that. However I do have a recoloection of blasting your rather ignorant comments. By the way, may I note that, "could care less about you and your stupid bridges. The nursery rhyme "London Bridge is falling down" isn't a coincidence!" Are these your words? Because here you in fact did blast all British technology on acount of one bridge, not me!
2. The fact is, in the UK, you don't have any bridges that are subjected to the types of forces that the TN bridge was subjected to. One of my degrees is in mechanical engineering and I'm here to tell you, that field has changed radically since the 1940s. Methods of sections, methods of joints, vibrational analysis, mat-sci, strength of materials, et. al. were all unheard of at that time. Engineers, the world over, used "That Looks About Right" when designing things. Not anymore.
3. Now days engineering mechanics are much better understood than they were back then.
For you to then come along and say how big England in is in telephone technology is also foolish, especially to someone like me who has a direct link to the very inventor of the telephone, a man and an invention who/that was very much American!
The rest of the world copies and enjoys US technology (which is just fine). But don't then come along and say that the US is technologically ignorant!
@jumboJetPilot Lets not forget the internet...which WE British invented. So YOU would be sat in front of the computer bored.
Besides, bridges - You only have to look at the 2 Severn Bridges, Clifton Suspension Bring, Humber Bridge, all the Bridges stretching the River Thames in London and ALL the other Bridges dotted around the British Isles from John O Groates to Lands End, to realise we do a pretty good bloody job making Bridges, you half wit!
@GDWGlos No you didn't develop the internet. The very first time two computers to electronically communicate (pre-cursor to the internet) was at the IBM laboratory in 1949 - very much in the United States!
I could care less about you and your stupid bridges. The nursery rhyme "London Bridge is falling down" isn't a coincidence!
I routinely go to England and it is probably the most backwoodsy, stuck in the 1950s country I've ever been to - and I've been to over 50 countries!
@jumboJetPilot Uh, one Nursery Rhyme and that makes all Bridges rubbish? What the hell. Kingdom Brunel made some of the most beautiful bridges and they are still standing to this very day.
I can't really bothered having handbag fights with you over which is and who is greater. I am 100% British and very much proud of the fact. I have no idea what on earth you are on about, being stuck in the 1950's, but then neither do I care to be perfectly honest.
@jumboJetPilot Ok you just seem to be just saying words now, "stuck in the 1950s"? I mean what the hell do you mean by that exactly? Please, so the U.S becoming agitated their Head of State is black and is still obbsessed with ufology is 21st century thinking is it?
@GDWGlos And BTW, the idea of computer data transfer came from the telephone. And wouldn't you know it, I just happen to be friends with two brothers named Spence and Seth Bell, whose great, great, great grandfather was Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone. Spence, Seth, and their great, great, great grandfather are all very much American!
who ever says that their parents or siblings say this is fake because they are an architect you are wrong you need to be an engineer because the bridge had no support underneath the neck, the bridge was blown by the wind therefore to collasp
@ultrakara16 Actaully you're wrong. It is real, but your explanation was terrible to say the least. It's physics pal. resonance at its best. The wind did cause it to collapse, but not blown by it. It just caused the bridge to vibrate in larger amplitudes therefore, well you saw what happened.
How did anyone think this thing was ever safe? People weren't innocent back then, they were downright stupid. Well, I guess these things were new. Nobody's car had been blown off the Mackinaw Bridge yet, none of these newfangled things had shown any serious problems, and "the rocking was just a hoot".
Just what does Auchwitz, Nazis, Holocaust denial, moon landings, 9/11, conspracies, gas chambers, and terrorism have to do with some footage of a freaking bridge?
that was actually real where else would you get that footage but someday we will find the remains of the bridge on the bottom of the lake or stream or pond or whatever and we will say its still wiggiling
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Does anyone here think the Holocaust ,as defined as 6,000,000 gassed in a bedroom ( or even 1 person gassed) is legit or a hoax.
What do you think? Is a pile of shoes and glasses proof of that or whould you want REAL evidence like a body for example with cyanide in it. If you said a body , you are thinking like a scientist, but NOT one was EVER found . Hoax.
@390bullitt1968 And there are no bodies because they were all burned in the crematories.Why the hell would some one fake something like that. You can even go to Auschwitz and SEE it for yourself. I happen to know a holocaust surviver/It was more than just people being gassed. Some were worked to death also. God why don't you pick up a freaking textbook and read.
@girlofgaga63 - except you are very ignorant of the facts. There were coal shipments to the camp that would have permitted about 70,000 cremations. Roughly half of those were Catholics! Wow, bet nobody bothered to tell you that! The problem with Auschwitz is the camp is built on a swamp. Water table is 2 feet. Burial is impossible. Therefore, 1,430,000 bodies went missing, or folks made up some big lies. No other options!
@390bullitt1968 Well, for one thing Aushwitz wasn't the only death camp. And also, the Nazi's kept impecable records of the deaths. There is recorded proof of what happened. And yes, I know catholics were killed in concentration camps and I really don't see what that has to do with anything. I suppose you think the moon landing was fake and the government masterminded 911. And why did you even bring this up here? This video has NOTHING to do with the holocaust
@girlofgaga63 - After WW2 ended, America sent teams of Pathologists to Germany to find these gassing camps. They found none! Russia had invaded poland and sealed it off from America. That is where the legend was born. Since 1989, when camp Auschwitz has been opened to inspection, no evidence of gassing have been found. None. Hence the MAIN reason promoters refuse to debate this issue! Moon lnding was real. 911 was carried out by elements of the gov, mil,overseas intell agencies.
@mrdrummer612 The standard Degesch delousing chambers could have been adapted for mass murder by the addition of some internal screening or metal grating so that the condemned could not wreck essential equipment that was readily accessible from within the chambers. Except for their modest size, usually only ten cubic meters, these modified delousing chambers would have been sufficiently effective for mass murder. there is no undeniable proof of mass murder but there was certainly potential
@Mrdrummer612 - There were and still exist to this day 3 actual GAS CHAMBERS on the camp site. They are not on the tour though. The victims in these 3 gas chambers were clothing and mattresses. No humans. These gas chambers have a large amount of prussian blue on the walls, as you would expect from a gas chamber operation using cyanide. The first set of alleged survivors from Auschwitz told stories that made no sense, which in turn boxed in the present day promoters to one version ! cont..
@390bullitt1968 - part 2- Before 1978 the promoters cold just yell anti semite at those who doubted the legend.
after 1990, the cat was out of the bag. The evidence it was a fraud was too much to contain. That is why laws were passed to outlaw doubt. Imagine that, a new religion that the entire world must believe. Holocaustanity
is a legend that is falling apart faster than a cheap suit.
@390bullitt1968 so what do you suggest happened to all these people? cos there were a million missing from my country, nearly 10% of the population at the time
@rietveen26 Jews in Europe in 1930 numbered 4,500,000. When Hitler came to power they began to leave. For example in 1932, 15,000 Jews went to Palestine. in 1937 it was 46,000. I would say 500,000 went to Palestine, and many others went to USA, Australia, and other nations. Some unknown number went to Russia. 2,000,000 Jews remained in Europe after the war. There were 400,000 Jews in Germany in 1939. 200,000 in 1945. Recall, in 1946 it was STEAM chambers, not gas! It is a financial scam!
@390bullitt1968 I think you are as much of a denialist as the flat-earthers, my country has all of the names of the people who died. of course, this is not evidence to you as they are all involved in a ''financial scam''. of course we can never prove with a 100% certainty that the holocaust didn't happen, but it is more likely than not that it happened. have you ever seen the pictures of the mass graves by the way? I have...two thousand human beings reduced to a mountain of corpses.
@rietveen26 - I have spent more than 17 years reseraching the holocaust and made two trips to Poland to do onsite research. You looked at a picture or two and are the expert? you need to begin by reviewing the statements of the so called survivors to know this is a scam. They proclam 1,500,000 bodies buried at Auschwitz. The camp is built on a swamp! A 2 foot waterr table rules out burial. That is why they had 15
ovens. They cremated the dead. Those victims died primarily from Typhus. Next.
@390bullitt1968 do you agree with nazism? or has that nothing to do with this according to you?. btw, some random dude saying he spent 17 years researching a subject is not very believable, don't you think? I'd like to see your work/research in a more....scientific context, like an article. right now you are still a denialist like all the others
@rietveen26 - scientific proof comes from observation. With regards the alleged holocaust, all the observable evidence works against the claims of 6,000,000 being gassed, much less 11,000,000.
These are ridiculous numbers. Those who die from cyanide poisoning exhibit a reddish color on their skin, much like a severe sunburn. Not one so called " survivor " ever documents this condition. There are no mass graves and there was limited cremation capacity. ...contd
@390bullitt1968 Typical promoter tactics always resort to moving the debate away from one camp and on to another. My political beliefs are not the issue. The issue is did Germany gas 6,000,000 Jews in gas chambers and the scientific answer is no. The International Red Cross, an unbiased observer of events in Poland and Germany during the war wrote a 1600 page report on the concentration camps in 1946, and had good news to report about the treatment of Auschwitz prisoners.
@390bullitt1968 Part C. How would the Red Cross know about Auschwitz? They visited the camp and were allowed private one on one meetings with prisoners. From 1949-1959 six world leaders wrote about World War Two in books. Stalin, Truman, Eisenhower, DeGaulle, Churchill. and the Pope. They were from 5 different nations. Yet in the more than 10,000 pages in these books, not ONE word of gas chambers is ever mentioned. Why? The STEAM chambers story ( not yet GAS ) was seen as a wartime hoax.
Part D - The "survivors" stories of Jews being STEAMED to death made the rounds but everyone knew it was a lie. That story then became electrocution chambers. Again the public ignored the lies. In 1978, the Zionists had complete control of the media and the US Congress , so the GAS Chamber story was reborn into a media that refused to queston any details. The bad peple were those who asked questions. This farce fooled many until Poland was liberated in 1990. Then the hoax was in the open.
@390bullitt1968 sounds awesome and all, but I bet you are not from europe as you don't have holocaust survivors in your direct surroundings. there people all tell the same story about the concentration camps. do you suggest they were brainwashed?
@rietveen26 - is it possible many people repeat a story they have heard from others. Sure. Does it prove anything ? No. You need to realize on one hand is something called hearsay. On the other is scientific fact, forensic fact. Hearsay is never allowed in a court of law, forensic acts are allowed. However, Nuremberg allowed hearsay no matter who said it or how outrageous. Nuremberg was not justice.
@Oneill9293 That's what I thought too, but then my physics teacher explained it! Apparently when something (the wind) is set to the same frequency as something else (the bridge) it causes resonance in the object. At least that's what I remember from the past few days..
it did not go that high! it looks sooo fake!!!! I like the new bridge so much better, but since i heard about the HUGE squid that lives under it, im afraid that if i go over the bridge, im gonna fall off and be eaten by it, and its REALLY high
Copied from below " It was a matter of civic pride to keep it open, since it was "the bridge of the future". The original design cost $11 million, but another engineer (Mouisseff, I think) proposed a lighter, narrower bridge for only $6. During the Depression, this was mighty attractive. So his design won."
I am an engineer and I know what cause the failure. At the time there was no design requirement for wind loading for bridges because it was never a problem. At this bridge it was and the wind caused resonance made the bridge shake itself to death. That is your science lesson for today. Class demised.
@voomdama dude, what kind of engineer are you? I am also an engineer and youre clearly a bad one. First, the wind cannot cause resonance unless it is creating a force which is oscillating at (or close to) the natural frequency of the bridge structure. Second, your grammar sucks and the word is dismissed. Not demised.
@Pete1635 Sorry I misspelled something on the internet. I'll have to turn in my diploma for that but I am a civil engineer. The wind started causing tiny bits or torsion in the bridge itself. This was witnessed by people on the bridge when they would feel move when it is windy. This got of out of hand the day of the failure when it was very windy. Dont believe that wind can do this, then look how sky scrapers move in the wind or research the subject.
$6 million, I mean! Though it behaved like it was $6. I'm no engineer, but the abnormal flexiblity of this bridge must have been caused by the lighter, narrower design. It is incredible to watch the contortion as it begins to flap like a pancake. Then when it falls apart, it looks so flimsy. How did it hold together for as long as it did? Why did they let people drive on a heaving, bucking road with (likely) cracks in the concrete and metal fatigue?
I am amazed people were allowed to drive on that bridge when it was heaving up and down like that. Several engineers and the men who built the bridge had severe doubts that it would hold up, but nobody listened. It was a matter of civic pride to keep it open, since it was "the bridge of the future". The original design cost $11 million, but another engineer (Mouisseff, I think) proposed a lighter, narrower bridge for only $6. During the Depression, this was mighty attractive. So his design won.
the bridge was designed to be like the George Washington bridge but the designer chose to make it a solid deck with no under structure to stiffen it like the new narrows bridge is now and the narrows is like a giant wind tunnel even today thay have high wind warnings and stop big trucks from going over it during the high winds
Kubarebo: aeroelastic flutter produced a vibrational twisting on the bridge close to the resonant frequency. When a system vibrates close to its resonant frequency the magnification factor of the forced vibration may grow to very large values producing very large amplitudes. That's what happened here. Aeroelastic flutter was the forcing excitation, resonant conditions produced the collapse.
Extreme Engineering Disasters covers this particular bridge collapse. As stated, it was caused by the wind and the aero profile of the wind blowing across the roadway. It would lift the roadway, much like the winds lift an airplane's wings.
This is a joke, I cant believe people are just driving and walking on it like it was "safe". They put their life on the line. It just shows how ignorant people were 50 years ago.
go to any modern suspension bridge and lay down to the ground and you'll see it wobble up and down with transverse waves. If they built these bridges rigid, they would snap under the strain of the load. before Gertie collapsed, she was perfectly safe, it was only once twisting motions started that the bridge would be unsafe and could fail.
Leon Moisseiff was the lead engineer responsible for this collapsed bridge. He cared more about a good looking structure and cutting costs than he did about safety.
@Astromchaser The material at the time was steel and concrete i believe. Its moving like that because the wind and the bridge have the same frequency. Its all physics related.
Incredible footage! While I don't mind a bridge moving under me while I drive, this would be way too much movement, and could be dangerous. In that case, it'd be better to save yourself and, if possible, save any pets you happen to happen to be with you than to save your car.
ok im doing a science project on which bridge desing supports the most weight?? a cable stayed bridge or the bridge like the one in the video which is a suspension bridge. can everyone please help me by commenting which bridge u think is better??? thanx :)
@malikisvelocity101 check out the Mackinac Bridge in Michigan. it is a suspension bridge that was designed and built properly, and has been expertly maintained ever since. you will find in your studies, that suspension bridges are the strongest, and most reliable when the engineering is genuinely perfect, as is the case with Mackinac. solidly serving Michigan since 1956.
the guy tried to save the dog but it bit whoever tried to get him out because he was so frightened and was eventually (and unfortunately) left in the car as the only fatality :[
love to see how many out takes there was on this video.
craig79792000 3 weeks ago in playlist COOOL
was the bridge made of plastic or what ?
MrBizaaro 3 weeks ago
That's wind not an earthquake
LoLxProductionzz 1 month ago
That Is Acary!
Holls009 1 month ago
humans of planet earth invented everything. so shut the fuck up and stop arguing. People like you guys that argue about shit like this are just are fucking ridiculous. STFU!!!!!!!!
jwile21 1 month ago
They were insane to ever let anyone drive on that bridge.
ferociousgumby 1 month ago
Made in China?
baroch8 2 months ago
Sometimes, the comments are even more entertaining than the footage. Just sayin...
amberheartofthefinch 2 months ago
I heard this happened pretty recently. I heard this happened like at 4:09 P.M. in a couple of days.
zoomerlawns 4 months ago
r.i.p the dog in the car :'(
GDWGlos 5 months ago 12
@GDWGlos the dog was saved! :) watch the Tacoma video with 4 million views, you see a professor walking out of the bridge with the dog :)
MCroxxie14 2 months ago
@MCroxxie14 "No human life was lost in the collapse of the bridge. However, a small dog perished after it was abandoned in a car on the bridge by its owner, Leonard Coatsworth, and by another man, both of whom were bitten by the terrified dog when they attempted to remove it." Tacoma Narrows Bridge - Wikipedia
GDWGlos 2 months ago
@GDWGlos ok shut up
MCroxxie14 2 months ago
@MCroxxie14 What is the matter with you? Don't like it when someone actually bothers to research facts?
GDWGlos 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GDWGlos ok shut up
MCroxxie14 2 months ago
@GDWGlos ok shut up.
MCroxxie14 2 months ago
@GDWGlos they got the dog out before the bridge collapsed
Guyonxbox 1 week ago
Sure, Nuremburg was justice. It resulted in the killing of nazis's did'nt it. Thats justice. You would have probably let O. J. Simpson go free.
sprtman 5 months ago
FINAL DESTINATION 5
ANDrewDIeGOandHAILeE 5 months ago
FINAL DESTINATION 5 BROUGHT ME HERE XD
OGkush815 5 months ago 7
Ha typical American engineering! Don't even know the basics of building a bridge
PUDGERIFIC 6 months ago
@PUDGERIFIC "Ha typical American engineering! Don't even know the basics of building a bridge"
Really? If this bridge were British engineering it would have fallen apart on the second day. You guys still can't even make a reliable car, half way descent airplanes - or a reliable anything for that matter! You still use QFE altimeter settings in parts of your country, you drive on the wrong side of the road relative to just about every other country. I haven't even scratched the surface here!
jumboJetPilot 5 months ago
@jumboJetPilot we can make a reliable car aston martins are reliable morgans are reliable we have reliable planes e.g airbus and we drive on the proper side of the road because when they did jousting and that you needed your right hand closer to the other person so it carried on from that and whats wrong with the QFE altimeter
PUDGERIFIC 5 months ago
@PUDGERIFIC
1. You have to pay between US $75,000 to $400,000 to get a reliable car! How about the reliability of your lesser expensive cars, like Jaguar, the least reliable car maker in the world?
2. Airbus is a European conglomerate, not just British - you can't take credit for that.
3. I'm glad you think driving on the left hand side of the road is better - because the rest of the world doesn't see it that way.
4. When using QFE there is significantly greater room for error (continued)...
jumboJetPilot 5 months ago
@jumboJetPilot Americans make a reliable car most of the cars that Anerica make can't even go round corners and 400,000 dollars for a car that America made when has a British person done that also stop living in the seventies Jaguar is a reliable company making reliable cars now.
PUDGERIFIC 4 months ago
@PUDGERIFIC
4. When using QFE there is significantly greater room for error which greatly increases the possibility of "Controlled Flight Into Terrain" (CFIT for short). Many airplanes have crashed in years past from misinterpreting altimeter information due to QFE. That's why it's not used anywhere except certain parts of England and a handful of the various Russian states - and the various former Soviet countries aren't exactly a good mark for aircraft safety to mirror.
(Continued)...
jumboJetPilot 5 months ago
@PUDGERIFIC
5. Let's not forget that the very computer you are using to type your messages here on YouTube is American technology. Who do you think developed the computer? We did! We also developed the vast majority of telecommunications systems in use worldwide today.
6. There's a reason why so many other countries around the world have adopted US engineering and safety standards - and that's because we've set ourselves apart, compared to the rest of the world, in this regard.
jumboJetPilot 5 months ago
@jumboJetPilot Ah, another Britain vs America youtube argument, well let the games begin!
Well first of buddy, please remind me with your superior American mind which bridge we ever built that collapsed in two days? ummm..ahhh..ummm nope sorry cant think of one. Oh, you know that really tall bridge in France? look it um on your magnificent invention wikipedia! Anyway, WE desgined it, let me just check on wikipedia if its collappsed-umm noo umm ahhhh umm nope still there sorry bud wrong there
glitch4465 4 months ago
@jumboJetPilot (Cont)
Ok, so you inventedd youtube, my entire country salutes you. Congractulations, you've saved 7 billion people from considering killing themselves in brief moment of boredom. Youtube my god! well sure as hell makes the steam engine look like crap! God you tube eh...PRAISE VIACOM! Oh and do me a favour, get your phone, your proberbly American phone and prize it open, the microchips that are in ALL phones are actually british!
glitch4465 4 months ago
@glitch4465 I've been getting my Boeing 747-400 type rating and have been too busy for silly arguments.
Maybe YOUR phone's microchips are made in Britain. Mine certainly aren't. I have an iPhone. Designed by the engineers at Apple and made in China under exclusive contract.
Since you brought telephones, I have two personal friends of mine that are brothers, Spence and Seth Bell, whose great, great, great grandfather was Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone; and very much American!
jumboJetPilot 2 months ago
@jumboJetPilot Oh, congratulations.
MY phone's microchips and many other all over the world are infact developed by a firm in Cambridge, which has recently been given a large contract by *oh god hold your breath* Microsoft to supply componets for the new Windows 8 soft and hardware. By 2015 it will have 23% global market share in microprocessors in all the worlds computers. So no, not just Britain. Sorry about that.
glitch4465 2 months ago
@jumboJetPilot Second, oh Alexander Graham Bell was actually Scottish.
Sorry.
glitch4465 2 months ago
So um about that, you can thank me later for us getting your phone to work in what I assume is going to be an obnoxious, loud U-S-A!!! bellowing reply.
So well done, you have successfully demostrated that without Uncle Sam our pitiful race will still be in the dark ages. PRAISE OBAMA, I mean, what the hell do you want me to do? Storm Buckingham Palace wearing northing but the Stars and Stripes? Please.
glitch4465 4 months ago
@glitch4465
1. You're not going to hear me preaching to anyone about what a wonderful country and people the United States is/are. However, I give credit where and to whom it is due, regardless of where they are from. For you to come along and blast all of American technology on the account of a single bridge, long before the engineering mechanics behind it were understood, makes you look like an ignorant fool, regardless of where you are from.
jumboJetPilot 2 months ago
@jumboJetPilot I didn't blast all American technology on a single bridge, I have absoloutley no recolection of doing that. However I do have a recoloection of blasting your rather ignorant comments. By the way, may I note that, "could care less about you and your stupid bridges. The nursery rhyme "London Bridge is falling down" isn't a coincidence!" Are these your words? Because here you in fact did blast all British technology on acount of one bridge, not me!
glitch4465 2 months ago
@glitch4465
2. The fact is, in the UK, you don't have any bridges that are subjected to the types of forces that the TN bridge was subjected to. One of my degrees is in mechanical engineering and I'm here to tell you, that field has changed radically since the 1940s. Methods of sections, methods of joints, vibrational analysis, mat-sci, strength of materials, et. al. were all unheard of at that time. Engineers, the world over, used "That Looks About Right" when designing things. Not anymore.
jumboJetPilot 2 months ago
@jumboJetPilot We dont have earthquakes in Britain, thats why.
glitch4465 2 months ago
@glitch4465
3. Now days engineering mechanics are much better understood than they were back then.
For you to then come along and say how big England in is in telephone technology is also foolish, especially to someone like me who has a direct link to the very inventor of the telephone, a man and an invention who/that was very much American!
The rest of the world copies and enjoys US technology (which is just fine). But don't then come along and say that the US is technologically ignorant!
jumboJetPilot 2 months ago
@jumboJetPilot Lets not forget the internet...which WE British invented. So YOU would be sat in front of the computer bored.
Besides, bridges - You only have to look at the 2 Severn Bridges, Clifton Suspension Bring, Humber Bridge, all the Bridges stretching the River Thames in London and ALL the other Bridges dotted around the British Isles from John O Groates to Lands End, to realise we do a pretty good bloody job making Bridges, you half wit!
GDWGlos 2 months ago
@GDWGlos No you didn't develop the internet. The very first time two computers to electronically communicate (pre-cursor to the internet) was at the IBM laboratory in 1949 - very much in the United States!
I could care less about you and your stupid bridges. The nursery rhyme "London Bridge is falling down" isn't a coincidence!
I routinely go to England and it is probably the most backwoodsy, stuck in the 1950s country I've ever been to - and I've been to over 50 countries!
jumboJetPilot 2 months ago
@jumboJetPilot Uh, one Nursery Rhyme and that makes all Bridges rubbish? What the hell. Kingdom Brunel made some of the most beautiful bridges and they are still standing to this very day.
I can't really bothered having handbag fights with you over which is and who is greater. I am 100% British and very much proud of the fact. I have no idea what on earth you are on about, being stuck in the 1950's, but then neither do I care to be perfectly honest.
GDWGlos 2 months ago
@jumboJetPilot We did npt develop "The internet" we developed the world wide web, his comment is still valid.
glitch4465 2 months ago
@jumboJetPilot Ok you just seem to be just saying words now, "stuck in the 1950s"? I mean what the hell do you mean by that exactly? Please, so the U.S becoming agitated their Head of State is black and is still obbsessed with ufology is 21st century thinking is it?
glitch4465 2 months ago
@GDWGlos And BTW, the idea of computer data transfer came from the telephone. And wouldn't you know it, I just happen to be friends with two brothers named Spence and Seth Bell, whose great, great, great grandfather was Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone. Spence, Seth, and their great, great, great grandfather are all very much American!
jumboJetPilot 2 months ago
@GDWGlos Thank you, I have no idea what these people are on about.
glitch4465 2 months ago
at 0:51 if this is real why isnt that car sliding? its fake
MrHeyfuckoff 6 months ago
who ever says that their parents or siblings say this is fake because they are an architect you are wrong you need to be an engineer because the bridge had no support underneath the neck, the bridge was blown by the wind therefore to collasp
ultrakara16 6 months ago
@ultrakara16 Actaully you're wrong. It is real, but your explanation was terrible to say the least. It's physics pal. resonance at its best. The wind did cause it to collapse, but not blown by it. It just caused the bridge to vibrate in larger amplitudes therefore, well you saw what happened.
r0binzero 6 months ago
HHSmarchingfalcons, he was giving his daughter a three legged dog?
starwarsfleet 6 months ago
some great engineering work there...:/
mnandor 7 months ago
@ReiChanM i suppose i could see that happening, nice use of my name haha
Petrified3 7 months ago
Looks kinda like one of Obama's shovel ready jobs.
TheJboogie314 7 months ago
How did anyone think this thing was ever safe? People weren't innocent back then, they were downright stupid. Well, I guess these things were new. Nobody's car had been blown off the Mackinaw Bridge yet, none of these newfangled things had shown any serious problems, and "the rocking was just a hoot".
bladeofbattousai 8 months ago
@P00rSveta There was a dog in the car that was on the bridge when it collapsed. His owner ran off and left the dog locked in.
bladeofbattousai 8 months ago
@bladeofbattousai actully the real owner was the drivers daughter
ccmattyfilms 7 months ago
I wouldn't wanna be on that thing when it was wobbling like that. O_O >.<
MezmerEyes1992 8 months ago
Just what does Auchwitz, Nazis, Holocaust denial, moon landings, 9/11, conspracies, gas chambers, and terrorism have to do with some footage of a freaking bridge?
RedShadow1917 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
R.I.P classic car
FLABEX224 9 months ago
What does auschwitz have to do with standing waves?
samwisecat 9 months ago
there was actually a dog in that car... why did the owner just leave it there!!!! could of atleast opened the door and let it run free!!
Petrified3 9 months ago
@Petrified3 the dogs name was tubby and he belonged to leonard coatsworth's(the driver) daughter the dog was paralysed and had only three legs.
HHSmarchingfalcons 6 months ago
wee
girlofgaga63 10 months ago
that was actually real where else would you get that footage but someday we will find the remains of the bridge on the bottom of the lake or stream or pond or whatever and we will say its still wiggiling
supergummybeargirl54 10 months ago
fake and gay
halvari 10 months ago
@halvari r u stupid no one wants ur shit here
jaxdaman999 10 months ago
@jaxdaman999 my shit made that gay bridge gooble gooble
halvari 10 months ago
@halvari Not fake, it actually happen. I heard about this when taking a construction unit in science.
halfmaster1 10 months ago
@halfmaster1 G-UNIT!!!! ?
halvari 8 months ago
@halvari Go troll somewhere else.
DXMan2330 8 months ago
@DXMan2330 Trolled in ur mom, ur butthole is next
halvari 8 months ago
@halvari Go troll somewhere else.
DXMan2330 8 months ago
I would hate to drive over that
longlivequeensongs 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fake
390bullitt1968 1 year ago
@390bullitt1968 Nope. It's physics.
DonxxSollozzo 1 year ago 24
@390bullitt1968 I agree. What with all the technological CGI they had back in the 50's, and the way they could make things look near-realistic.
FarfetchdForDinner 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Does anyone here think the Holocaust ,as defined as 6,000,000 gassed in a bedroom ( or even 1 person gassed) is legit or a hoax.
What do you think? Is a pile of shoes and glasses proof of that or whould you want REAL evidence like a body for example with cyanide in it. If you said a body , you are thinking like a scientist, but NOT one was EVER found . Hoax.
390bullitt1968 1 year ago
@390bullitt1968 And there are no bodies because they were all burned in the crematories.Why the hell would some one fake something like that. You can even go to Auschwitz and SEE it for yourself. I happen to know a holocaust surviver/It was more than just people being gassed. Some were worked to death also. God why don't you pick up a freaking textbook and read.
girlofgaga63 10 months ago
@girlofgaga63 - except you are very ignorant of the facts. There were coal shipments to the camp that would have permitted about 70,000 cremations. Roughly half of those were Catholics! Wow, bet nobody bothered to tell you that! The problem with Auschwitz is the camp is built on a swamp. Water table is 2 feet. Burial is impossible. Therefore, 1,430,000 bodies went missing, or folks made up some big lies. No other options!
390bullitt1968 10 months ago
@390bullitt1968 Well, for one thing Aushwitz wasn't the only death camp. And also, the Nazi's kept impecable records of the deaths. There is recorded proof of what happened. And yes, I know catholics were killed in concentration camps and I really don't see what that has to do with anything. I suppose you think the moon landing was fake and the government masterminded 911. And why did you even bring this up here? This video has NOTHING to do with the holocaust
girlofgaga63 10 months ago
@girlofgaga63 - After WW2 ended, America sent teams of Pathologists to Germany to find these gassing camps. They found none! Russia had invaded poland and sealed it off from America. That is where the legend was born. Since 1989, when camp Auschwitz has been opened to inspection, no evidence of gassing have been found. None. Hence the MAIN reason promoters refuse to debate this issue! Moon lnding was real. 911 was carried out by elements of the gov, mil,overseas intell agencies.
390bullitt1968 10 months ago
@mrdrummer612 The standard Degesch delousing chambers could have been adapted for mass murder by the addition of some internal screening or metal grating so that the condemned could not wreck essential equipment that was readily accessible from within the chambers. Except for their modest size, usually only ten cubic meters, these modified delousing chambers would have been sufficiently effective for mass murder. there is no undeniable proof of mass murder but there was certainly potential
Mrdrummer612 9 months ago
@Mrdrummer612 - There were and still exist to this day 3 actual GAS CHAMBERS on the camp site. They are not on the tour though. The victims in these 3 gas chambers were clothing and mattresses. No humans. These gas chambers have a large amount of prussian blue on the walls, as you would expect from a gas chamber operation using cyanide. The first set of alleged survivors from Auschwitz told stories that made no sense, which in turn boxed in the present day promoters to one version ! cont..
390bullitt1968 9 months ago
@390bullitt1968 - part 2- Before 1978 the promoters cold just yell anti semite at those who doubted the legend.
after 1990, the cat was out of the bag. The evidence it was a fraud was too much to contain. That is why laws were passed to outlaw doubt. Imagine that, a new religion that the entire world must believe. Holocaustanity
is a legend that is falling apart faster than a cheap suit.
390bullitt1968 9 months ago
@390bullitt1968 so what do you suggest happened to all these people? cos there were a million missing from my country, nearly 10% of the population at the time
rietveen26 5 months ago
@rietveen26 Jews in Europe in 1930 numbered 4,500,000. When Hitler came to power they began to leave. For example in 1932, 15,000 Jews went to Palestine. in 1937 it was 46,000. I would say 500,000 went to Palestine, and many others went to USA, Australia, and other nations. Some unknown number went to Russia. 2,000,000 Jews remained in Europe after the war. There were 400,000 Jews in Germany in 1939. 200,000 in 1945. Recall, in 1946 it was STEAM chambers, not gas! It is a financial scam!
390bullitt1968 5 months ago
@390bullitt1968 I think you are as much of a denialist as the flat-earthers, my country has all of the names of the people who died. of course, this is not evidence to you as they are all involved in a ''financial scam''. of course we can never prove with a 100% certainty that the holocaust didn't happen, but it is more likely than not that it happened. have you ever seen the pictures of the mass graves by the way? I have...two thousand human beings reduced to a mountain of corpses.
rietveen26 5 months ago
@rietveen26 - I have spent more than 17 years reseraching the holocaust and made two trips to Poland to do onsite research. You looked at a picture or two and are the expert? you need to begin by reviewing the statements of the so called survivors to know this is a scam. They proclam 1,500,000 bodies buried at Auschwitz. The camp is built on a swamp! A 2 foot waterr table rules out burial. That is why they had 15
ovens. They cremated the dead. Those victims died primarily from Typhus. Next.
390bullitt1968 5 months ago
@390bullitt1968 do you agree with nazism? or has that nothing to do with this according to you?. btw, some random dude saying he spent 17 years researching a subject is not very believable, don't you think? I'd like to see your work/research in a more....scientific context, like an article. right now you are still a denialist like all the others
rietveen26 5 months ago
@rietveen26 - scientific proof comes from observation. With regards the alleged holocaust, all the observable evidence works against the claims of 6,000,000 being gassed, much less 11,000,000.
These are ridiculous numbers. Those who die from cyanide poisoning exhibit a reddish color on their skin, much like a severe sunburn. Not one so called " survivor " ever documents this condition. There are no mass graves and there was limited cremation capacity. ...contd
390bullitt1968 5 months ago
@390bullitt1968 Typical promoter tactics always resort to moving the debate away from one camp and on to another. My political beliefs are not the issue. The issue is did Germany gas 6,000,000 Jews in gas chambers and the scientific answer is no. The International Red Cross, an unbiased observer of events in Poland and Germany during the war wrote a 1600 page report on the concentration camps in 1946, and had good news to report about the treatment of Auschwitz prisoners.
390bullitt1968 5 months ago
@390bullitt1968 Part C. How would the Red Cross know about Auschwitz? They visited the camp and were allowed private one on one meetings with prisoners. From 1949-1959 six world leaders wrote about World War Two in books. Stalin, Truman, Eisenhower, DeGaulle, Churchill. and the Pope. They were from 5 different nations. Yet in the more than 10,000 pages in these books, not ONE word of gas chambers is ever mentioned. Why? The STEAM chambers story ( not yet GAS ) was seen as a wartime hoax.
390bullitt1968 5 months ago
Part D - The "survivors" stories of Jews being STEAMED to death made the rounds but everyone knew it was a lie. That story then became electrocution chambers. Again the public ignored the lies. In 1978, the Zionists had complete control of the media and the US Congress , so the GAS Chamber story was reborn into a media that refused to queston any details. The bad peple were those who asked questions. This farce fooled many until Poland was liberated in 1990. Then the hoax was in the open.
390bullitt1968 5 months ago
@390bullitt1968 sounds awesome and all, but I bet you are not from europe as you don't have holocaust survivors in your direct surroundings. there people all tell the same story about the concentration camps. do you suggest they were brainwashed?
rietveen26 5 months ago
@rietveen26 - is it possible many people repeat a story they have heard from others. Sure. Does it prove anything ? No. You need to realize on one hand is something called hearsay. On the other is scientific fact, forensic fact. Hearsay is never allowed in a court of law, forensic acts are allowed. However, Nuremberg allowed hearsay no matter who said it or how outrageous. Nuremberg was not justice.
390bullitt1968 5 months ago
Do you something about Volgograd bridge waves. It was about 1-2 years ago. If yes - answer me.
igoregin 1 year ago
Excuse me? Oneill9293? It was real. My mom drove over it with her dad when it happened.
McKenzielovesTasia 1 year ago
wow jelly bridge
dwayneroby1 1 year ago
I just don't believe this footage. Learnt about this in A2 Physics, and I just can't accept it. It looks so fake!
Oneill9293 1 year ago
@Oneill9293 Well, apparently you didn't learn what resonance is.
rakolman 1 year ago
@Oneill9293 That's what I thought too, but then my physics teacher explained it! Apparently when something (the wind) is set to the same frequency as something else (the bridge) it causes resonance in the object. At least that's what I remember from the past few days..
BeautifulLogic 11 months ago
@ArmyWithinMe Lmao
AiliasFox 1 year ago
it did not go that high! it looks sooo fake!!!! I like the new bridge so much better, but since i heard about the HUGE squid that lives under it, im afraid that if i go over the bridge, im gonna fall off and be eaten by it, and its REALLY high
InYourJizz 1 year ago
It happens when a antinode and a node of the wind matches the bridge's pattern! Its a very rare thing! :D kinda cool!
Navnf 1 year ago
the old bridge looked way cooler than the new one/s
5Oblivion 1 year ago
it looks like the jello in the jello commercial
azenviv 1 year ago
Copied from below " It was a matter of civic pride to keep it open, since it was "the bridge of the future". The original design cost $11 million, but another engineer (Mouisseff, I think) proposed a lighter, narrower bridge for only $6. During the Depression, this was mighty attractive. So his design won."
NearDeathExperienc 1 year ago
Fortunately there was only a small amount of federal money lost on this project. Washington state took the big financial hit for this embarrassment.
label1877 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Go to your address bar, after the word YOU and before the word TUBE, type in "win" then press enter
MelodyMarie273 1 year ago
<<<===== dont click
Sasha17272 1 year ago
Thats freakin bad ass
AVagent007 1 year ago
The Ultimate Amusement Park Ride
nirvanafan21191 1 year ago
Sounds like a party
abcdcbaify 1 year ago
I am a random wind storm, shaky shaky shaky.
llamaswilltakeoverx3 1 year ago
@llamaswilltakeoverx3 lol
lazzyJames 1 year ago
LOL :D
It really looks like a joke
the narrow brings us a strange feeling .
can we imagine us in this bridge ? (:
TheHaseeCalling 1 year ago
LOL! It looks like Jello! XD
robotrobbie99 1 year ago
I am an engineer and I know what cause the failure. At the time there was no design requirement for wind loading for bridges because it was never a problem. At this bridge it was and the wind caused resonance made the bridge shake itself to death. That is your science lesson for today. Class demised.
voomdama 1 year ago
@voomdama dude, what kind of engineer are you? I am also an engineer and youre clearly a bad one. First, the wind cannot cause resonance unless it is creating a force which is oscillating at (or close to) the natural frequency of the bridge structure. Second, your grammar sucks and the word is dismissed. Not demised.
Pete1635 1 year ago
@Pete1635 Sorry I misspelled something on the internet. I'll have to turn in my diploma for that but I am a civil engineer. The wind started causing tiny bits or torsion in the bridge itself. This was witnessed by people on the bridge when they would feel move when it is windy. This got of out of hand the day of the failure when it was very windy. Dont believe that wind can do this, then look how sky scrapers move in the wind or research the subject.
voomdama 1 year ago
hell, that thing was just asking to break
BestGammerEver 1 year ago
i don't know about you but I can see a slight technical hitch with that bridge.
tom201090 1 year ago
those people are crazy i would not even think to go near a wabbling bridge,
RokaSoka 1 year ago
tht looks so freaky!!! :0
compute09 1 year ago
LOL that loks like a cartoon or something
Patsbug66 1 year ago
$6 million, I mean! Though it behaved like it was $6. I'm no engineer, but the abnormal flexiblity of this bridge must have been caused by the lighter, narrower design. It is incredible to watch the contortion as it begins to flap like a pancake. Then when it falls apart, it looks so flimsy. How did it hold together for as long as it did? Why did they let people drive on a heaving, bucking road with (likely) cracks in the concrete and metal fatigue?
ferociousgumby 1 year ago
I am amazed people were allowed to drive on that bridge when it was heaving up and down like that. Several engineers and the men who built the bridge had severe doubts that it would hold up, but nobody listened. It was a matter of civic pride to keep it open, since it was "the bridge of the future". The original design cost $11 million, but another engineer (Mouisseff, I think) proposed a lighter, narrower bridge for only $6. During the Depression, this was mighty attractive. So his design won.
ferociousgumby 1 year ago
is the bridge made of bricks or rubber?
upurhoe12321 1 year ago
How can concrete bend?
DaOneToRuleDaWorld 1 year ago
@DaOneToRuleDaWorld its called aeroelasticity flutter.
unganster44 9 months ago
also i love how the car is like FUCK U EARTHQUAKE!
MrNusecus 1 year ago
the footage on the bridge like 0:46 needs to be sped up and given happy music
MrNusecus 1 year ago
looks perfectly safe
bennyboy121 1 year ago
the bridge was designed to be like the George Washington bridge but the designer chose to make it a solid deck with no under structure to stiffen it like the new narrows bridge is now and the narrows is like a giant wind tunnel even today thay have high wind warnings and stop big trucks from going over it during the high winds
bondedlevity 1 year ago
Looks fun to try and run across
IidoTheFox 1 year ago
that looks fun.
bjpw9421 1 year ago
Kubarebo: aeroelastic flutter produced a vibrational twisting on the bridge close to the resonant frequency. When a system vibrates close to its resonant frequency the magnification factor of the forced vibration may grow to very large values producing very large amplitudes. That's what happened here. Aeroelastic flutter was the forcing excitation, resonant conditions produced the collapse.
drgilbertourroz 1 year ago
how does concert bend? :O
LadyGagaLandnet 1 year ago
Extreme Engineering Disasters covers this particular bridge collapse. As stated, it was caused by the wind and the aero profile of the wind blowing across the roadway. It would lift the roadway, much like the winds lift an airplane's wings.
kites0852 1 year ago
the guy who filmed this is probably the luckiest bastard of all time.
vangela321 1 year ago
Too much separation between the swaying and the collapse.
duncansrents 1 year ago
Not entirely stable.
agnernai 1 year ago
what caused this ?
Zihab2000 1 year ago
@Zihab2000 beacause of strong wind
yugariga1254 1 year ago
great
zcoool 1 year ago
@BURNOUTTEEN
Man go kill yourself. Pathetic life you have.
Flash11I19 1 year ago
This is a joke, I cant believe people are just driving and walking on it like it was "safe". They put their life on the line. It just shows how ignorant people were 50 years ago.
Flash11I19 1 year ago
@Flash11I19
go to any modern suspension bridge and lay down to the ground and you'll see it wobble up and down with transverse waves. If they built these bridges rigid, they would snap under the strain of the load. before Gertie collapsed, she was perfectly safe, it was only once twisting motions started that the bridge would be unsafe and could fail.
HelmutVillam 1 year ago
Leon Moisseiff was the lead engineer responsible for this collapsed bridge. He cared more about a good looking structure and cutting costs than he did about safety.
calandman 1 year ago
Id shit bricks within 100 feet of this bridge.
How the hell did the people cross it without freaking out?
LilRabidMutt 1 year ago
The bridge is swaying like its made of paper. Must be made out of some pretty flimsy metal.
Astromchaser 1 year ago
@Astromchaser The material at the time was steel and concrete i believe. Its moving like that because the wind and the bridge have the same frequency. Its all physics related.
KatKateInc 1 year ago
seriously what fuckin dogg, ive been looking over and over?????????????????
youngkhmerboi 1 year ago
o_____o holy shit.
that's kind of awesome and kind of scary.
Hikaru0love 1 year ago
Incredible footage! While I don't mind a bridge moving under me while I drive, this would be way too much movement, and could be dangerous. In that case, it'd be better to save yourself and, if possible, save any pets you happen to happen to be with you than to save your car.
Seattlecarnut 1 year ago
0:18 Wow. What's so important that you'd venture on a moving bridge? That is just insane.
imaroachee 1 year ago
poor dog.
lukeyboy118 1 year ago
@lukeyboy118 what dog?
gowwe12 1 year ago
@gowwe12 the man was forced to leave his dog in his car, what was left on the bridge because the poor dog was too afraid to leave the car.. =(
lukeyboy118 1 year ago
@gowwe12 there was a lil dog in the car that u see in the video... poor dog :,(
RawrAMPLol 1 year ago
Man, this was some seriously epic fail of engineering. At least they learned from the mistakes made here.
SpamWarrior3000 1 year ago
is this real?? why were those people walking so calmly? id be flipen running
MsJess619 1 year ago
What the fuck happened here...??
14Srb88 1 year ago
ok im doing a science project on which bridge desing supports the most weight?? a cable stayed bridge or the bridge like the one in the video which is a suspension bridge. can everyone please help me by commenting which bridge u think is better??? thanx :)
malikisvelocity101 1 year ago
@malikisvelocity101 check out the Mackinac Bridge in Michigan. it is a suspension bridge that was designed and built properly, and has been expertly maintained ever since. you will find in your studies, that suspension bridges are the strongest, and most reliable when the engineering is genuinely perfect, as is the case with Mackinac. solidly serving Michigan since 1956.
Orangeschpiel 1 year ago
I published this video on the Dutch website WELSTIJL (11 march) Kind regards Sem Mallée
welstijlfilms 1 year ago
Very good.
jaredcanyom 2 years ago
the guy tried to save the dog but it bit whoever tried to get him out because he was so frightened and was eventually (and unfortunately) left in the car as the only fatality :[
randomperson27 2 years ago
hahahah that looks so safe
tatianaslullaby 2 years ago
Comment removed
needles1987 2 years ago