harvey, you must be hungry and broke. If you can't see 911 was control demo you are a complete dumbass. What is wrong with you people. lol you deserve what the neocons are about to do to you and blame others......AGAIN.
@sssssjjjj1 I am a dyed in the wool democrat and will take neocons over you nut jobs any day of the week and twice on Sunday. There is No PROOF of controlled demoltion. NONE. NADA. Nothing even coming close to proof. Nothing even in the same ballpark as proof. No proof of anyone planting demolitions, or of anything being ignited. The BS about melting points and combustion heat levels is specious cobbling together of nonsensical hooey. Just like the nimrods who believe we never went to the moon.
Why the hell would they make a history documentary with made up "facts"? To me, it is just a deliberate disinformation: there is so much controversy within this 911 labyrinth, that many people end up believing the official "WTC-7 collapsed due to fire" or the "there were holograms instead of planes" story. The more time goes by and the more documentaries about 911 are made, the more difficult is it to actually comprehend what was going on - that is, I think, intentional.
Yeah the clinton administration dropped the ball, and now they are trying to cover it up, as is the leftist media by causing confusion to the facts and in some cases lie, and of course Harvey Keitel admits he isn't sure one way or the other. Think about it, bin laden didn't just put all this together in the short time bush was in office when it happened, who do these libs think they are kidding. The bush inherited a problem because clinton was too busy with cigars and white water, bottom line.
The scene with Sandy Berger refusing to pull the trigger on Bin Laden is made up? That's not what Buzz Patterson says in his book. He was the man with the "nuclear football", the strike codes that only the president can have and was with Pres Clinton or in close proximity at all times. He said that Berger could not get Clinton on the phone because he was on the golf course and refused to answer until too late. Release the film and let the American People see it. It should be demanded.
The most accurate source for John O'Neill's story is PBS's Pulitzer Prize-winning "Frontline". PBS has graciously allowed the entire episode to be watched online. The episode that tells John's story aired in October 2002. Please, please watch it. It's title was: "The Man Who Knew".
Harvey Keitel does an exceptional job of being diplomatic and respectful here. The part Keitel is playing is that of my personal hero, John O'Neill. I implore all of you to learn the facts of his life. And his death.
Harvey really isn't comfortable as an interviewee
destructivedandy 5 months ago
harvey, you must be hungry and broke. If you can't see 911 was control demo you are a complete dumbass. What is wrong with you people. lol you deserve what the neocons are about to do to you and blame others......AGAIN.
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
@sssssjjjj1 I am a dyed in the wool democrat and will take neocons over you nut jobs any day of the week and twice on Sunday. There is No PROOF of controlled demoltion. NONE. NADA. Nothing even coming close to proof. Nothing even in the same ballpark as proof. No proof of anyone planting demolitions, or of anything being ignited. The BS about melting points and combustion heat levels is specious cobbling together of nonsensical hooey. Just like the nimrods who believe we never went to the moon.
bman342 1 year ago
Why the hell would they make a history documentary with made up "facts"? To me, it is just a deliberate disinformation: there is so much controversy within this 911 labyrinth, that many people end up believing the official "WTC-7 collapsed due to fire" or the "there were holograms instead of planes" story. The more time goes by and the more documentaries about 911 are made, the more difficult is it to actually comprehend what was going on - that is, I think, intentional.
whiterottenrabbit 2 years ago
Yeah the clinton administration dropped the ball, and now they are trying to cover it up, as is the leftist media by causing confusion to the facts and in some cases lie, and of course Harvey Keitel admits he isn't sure one way or the other. Think about it, bin laden didn't just put all this together in the short time bush was in office when it happened, who do these libs think they are kidding. The bush inherited a problem because clinton was too busy with cigars and white water, bottom line.
TitaniumByFire 2 years ago
Sandy Berger the convicted classified document thief?
What was he hiding?
RMCDisciple 2 years ago
The scene with Sandy Berger refusing to pull the trigger on Bin Laden is made up? That's not what Buzz Patterson says in his book. He was the man with the "nuclear football", the strike codes that only the president can have and was with Pres Clinton or in close proximity at all times. He said that Berger could not get Clinton on the phone because he was on the golf course and refused to answer until too late. Release the film and let the American People see it. It should be demanded.
prrolg 2 years ago
I remember watching this on abc, and it does depict how the Clinton presidency let the American people down.
Taffie4690 3 years ago 2
OUR FOREIGN POLICY DID.
crap4face 3 years ago
what foreign policy? whenever someone bombed, killed some of us we just made up a farce of a invesitgation.
curtmastor 2 years ago
This is an excellent compilation. Thanks.
ArvidEngen 5 years ago
The most accurate source for John O'Neill's story is PBS's Pulitzer Prize-winning "Frontline". PBS has graciously allowed the entire episode to be watched online. The episode that tells John's story aired in October 2002. Please, please watch it. It's title was: "The Man Who Knew".
my15minutes 5 years ago
Harvey Keitel does an exceptional job of being diplomatic and respectful here. The part Keitel is playing is that of my personal hero, John O'Neill. I implore all of you to learn the facts of his life. And his death.
my15minutes 5 years ago