What a load of crap! Would you like some Socialism with your carbon tax sir...... Open your eyes, government weather modification is the cause of this fairy tale...
This CO2 warming propaganda is just voodoo science. Instead check out the cosmic ray theory by Svensmark et al (can find the video here on youtube), the Church of Global Warming video and the Great Global Warming Swindle. There has been no warming for the past 15 years and actually earlier this winter it got soo cold that I saw socialists walking around with their hands in their own pockets!
Data can not be taken from a specific place or instance for reliable evaluation. It is the pattern that emerges from varying data that gives a scientific hypothesis credit, at least in this instance. Socialism I dont understand it isnt relevant.
@lanceawatt - My argument is just fine. I´m obviously not going to explain the whole thin in 500 word comment on youtube but if you are interested I suggests starting here
I'm not denying Global Warming/Cooling but it has happened before and its going to keep happening. The World is aways heating up and cooling down. We may be speeding up the process but the planet can and will reset its self. Even if the human race becomes extinct the World its self will still be here.
BBC is a reputable station and broadcasts a lot of great documentaries. Are you all scientist that you can say they are all wrong and its just propaganda? hm.
"In 2010, global average temperature was 0.53°C (0.95°F) above the 1961-90 mean. This value is 0.01°C (0.02°F) above the nominal temperature in 2005, and 0.02°C (0.05°F) above 1998." WMO 2011
14:00 the polar bear has no chance of adapting to the climate change...guess someone didn't pay attention when Darwins Survival of the Fittest Theory was explained in biology class :P
@lexsoOr Polar Bears evolved over an enormous period of time. Sudden changes in climate will eliminate their food supply and cause them to die. Adaptation doesn't happen overnight and humans are disrupting the climate in a very unnatural way.
propoganda film, the govts. will take taxpayers money to develop all kinds of essential technologies then sell these required gadgets back to the same taxpayers; and lets bio-engineer martian foods so that we can contaminate the food supply causing lots of new disease that will require lots of new medicines and vaccines=when the govt. pays scientists off to say what they want them to say-when the govt. or UN is involved=do not believe a thing that you hear
Add what ever you want it will do no good unless we have CMA energy and this world has found not one person willing to help. That means YOU and you will suffer under all political stupidity. God said it's better to live among the meek and lowly then to rule among fools. So why do you follow these parasites. Why are you following these selfishly motivated people? You better wake up before there is no research available for this energy C.M.A. energy we need it now.
Quote Professor Iain Stewart: "A third of the Earth's surface is devoted to livestock"....Well if two thirds is ocean then this statement is obviously Bullsh1t! Another climate lie...
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
@purchville Dude are you for real? Two thirds is ocean yes, however, a third of the earth's surface is a 3rd of it's Surface not the whole of the planet. Climate change is not a lie it's fact. The governments of the world are only now owning up to the problem. Sadly it will only be when the media makes the problem a bigger issue that people will care enough. People are blind because it isn't a big enough problem yet, and wont see until it is much to late
its not depopulation you retard. Noone has to die. People simply need to understand that if they breed like rats, throwing litters of seven and eight children under circumstances in which they cannot even afford to feed themselves, then they will end up living like rats, wallowing in each others feces and ultimately being forced to eat each other. Why are people so stupid, the answer is so simple, the chinese got it right.
please-please listen everyone!. we know climate change is real,like it or not. question is r we seriouse about tackling it? look around u and u will notice that Nope we are not serious about it at all. All our politicians care about is how to make a buck and how to win the next election that's it.Therefore they all talk about putting a price on carbon will help. Total rubbish.Instead of such lobbying there are better way to tackle climate change like FRee energy technologies..
This is just one of many other pseudo media scientists who are on the money train, constant fear, maybe and could be prophecies of diasasters and global catashrophes, they're definetly profiting from scare mongering the public of constant destruction. Why hasn't he provided alternative theories on the topic? The science is not over, the debate has not concluded, conviently he forgot to mention the climategate emails and false IPCC data. Do not be taken in by these carbon taxing fraudsters.
So the artificial trees are going to store up lots of co2, so the trees and vegetation will not get enough themselfs and all die out. Oh we humans are going to ruin everything, we make so much wierd changes to mother earth we will be amazed in the future. :)
@ThermalHD Are you retarded...the worlds problem is we realise more Co2 than the trees can absorb so how by using the engineered trees would we be harming the environment. The main reason global warming is happening in my eyes is not so much the burning of fossil fuels but more the way we obtain them same with a lot of things we use...the removal of trees and over population will be out biggest downfall.
@chaoshawk69 I was thinking, what if those take too much of the co2, and the trees get less or lots less,, then they will die or produce much less oxygen. Trees, plants etc needs co2 dont they ( i think i have heard this on a documentary somewhere)
@ThermalHD clearly you heard it but didn't pay attention to it. The scientists would know the capacity that each "tree" could hold roughly so while you ignorantly make snide sarcastic remarks all you are doing is making yourself look more and more stupid. I don't know if you heard this part or not as well but but there was a 138 or so higher count of carbon in the atmosphere than back when the world's land mass was majority vegetation not buildings.
@ThermalHD So in conclusion to that, if more trees could survive back when there was less carbon in the atmosphere I'm pretty sure they will survive when artificial trees bring the Co2 levels back to how they should be.
i have an idea. our earths core is a big ball of hot lava, and the oil we drill out of the ground helps cool that heat from inside the earth. now that we are drilling so much and running out of alot of places to drill. our earth is getting hotter and gonna seize up like a motor would if it ran with no oil.
@hahanelsonhaha why dont you google what billion means. There is a difference in british and american english. So yeah, dumb as shit and proud iof it, arnt you?
Ummmm... Hmmmmm... Lets Make Plastic "Trees" why not just Plant more Trees & Protect our Rain Forrests???. Also why make Fake Meat? Just stop ... Technology is only mimicking the perfect structures given to us by Nature... I like the ideas behind this Documentary, but am annoyed, by the Technology Quick wannabe fixes...
what about the wars that america is waging. dropping bombs. killing toddlers and producing tonnes of carbon dioxide, monoxide and tonnes of other gases. i wonder why these 'great' scientists featured in this documentary are not a shit concerned about that?
Many people need to defragment their minds, do a disk clean-up on their thoughts and reorganize those folders where all of that junk was stored. Start over from scratch and learn how and why there is always someone.....looking to control you?
Who exactly has been programming you people............?
@kingtoadius 3000 weather records was set in 2011 in US alone and still you watch it with you're own eyes and completely deny what is right infront of you, every proof is right there and still you chose to turn your head the other side, WHY?
Biased? Whats the other view? There are only one side to this, as with gravity and the heliosentric world view. Sure you always have some fringe idiots, just as you will always have some holocaust deniers and flat earthers.
The deniers had some sound arguments back in the 90s, but now it has all been refuted by science. Even Koch Industries funded Müller had to change his view at last.
Cons/Right Wingers are right in that EVEN if global warming is happening it is NATURAL.
It is, indeed, very natural, like the existence of Fe, C, H, Co, Au, O, etc. Problem with these ideologues is they THINK they're gonna be okay. Not true.
Earth WILL BE okay, but not homo sapiens. Earth's various cycles of gyrations last 10's of thousands of years. But 2-10 years (#1) of extreme drought or (#2) of volcanic ashes covering much of the earth & BILLIONS of homo sapiens could EASILY perish.
@HenryDavidT Thats like saying killing someone is natural, he was going to be dead anyway, right? This global warming is not natural, the effect of changes in solar force in recent decades is small, not enough to cause these changes in our atmosphere.
(please read article before the denier TROLL censors it)..
.
'Venice of Northwest Alaska' sinking because of climate change
.
The permafrost has sunk so much in one Northwest Alaska village that bridges are shifting, outdoor stairways hang over the ground and sagging water pipes are prone to break and freeze. Those are a few of the ways climate change is affecting life in the Inupiat village of Selawik.
you probably dont even know why the sun is heating up yet you still give your opinion. anyways, you and your black people will burn as easy as anyone else on this planet should solar flares strike the earth or if temperatures rise significantly at unprecedented levels.im dark brown (mexican) but the sun doesnt look at color even though my ancestors were obsessed with it, it doesnt matter. lets looks for solutions not hate.
Mr Thomas Robert Malthus was spot on population growth and foresaw that population reduction was necessary especially among the lower classes & that if population growth would exceed the growth of technology it would lead to disaster and now he is being proved accurate almost 200 years after his death.
It doesn't matter if we reduce our carbon emissions as long as the population continues to grow in the current pace it will continue to lead to disaster. the growth of populations must cease.
@SuperZiggy12 If you suggest that depopulation should occur then you should be one of those who are depopulated... anyways you have no right to decide on who gets to live noone has that right in my opinion
@blazin20aday Well sir. The past 200 years we've seen a rise in populations due to a variety of changes in both socio-economic & technological improvements. However due to a massive improvements in the medical field these changes has turned to the worse & as our resources are finite and being depleted and as we've allowed the lower classes to increase their umber of children especially in the third world we are now seeing the consequence of that. Depopulation is the only answer.
@blazin20aday I do want do continue with that as the western birthrates has plummeted due to improvement in technology, socio-economics & improved education though things has gotten worse in 3rd world countries with increasing birth-rates as a rapid pace and have resulted in devastating effect for both the environment & the Co2 emissions. I do not however argue for an entire eradication of the birth rates, but I'd rather see the implementation of a global birth-right policy.
@SuperZiggy12 simple solutions would work well for example I live in the UK and noticed there's incentive for a woman to get pregnant as the government will give them housing.. needless to say more? also concerning 3rd world countries what is wrong with them using solar power in Africa huge cities can be made using the latest solar panel technologies, why not give it to them. Give people somthing to do to fix things remake everything screw Money its nothing but a prison we created for ourselves.
The logic seems very simple (1) highest CO2 level in atmosphere in at least 600,000 years (2) high correlation between CO2 concentration and surface temperature... the evidence that the earth is already warming with Arctic/Antarctic melting and glaciers retreating from high mountains... The debate is whether human caused the sharp rise in CO2 level... my question to deniers is if not human, then who?
"and three degrees or more warmer before the end of the century", we will hit an ice age by then. Wow this global warming is ultra slow, relax kick back and breath some loving CO2 out.
Act as if it is human made and hope you are wrong. Something like Pascals wager... You don't want to gamble with the future of humanity and our fellow beings. It's not life after death,your soul or any other supernatural nonsense. It's life itself,the human conscientiousness and nature.
The laws of nature is the law of us. You might break a contract but you don't break THE LAW!!
Act as if it is human mad and hope you are wrong. Something like Pascals wager... You don't want to gamble with the future of humanity and our fellow beings. It's not life after death,your soul or any other supernatural nonsense. It's life itself,the human conscientiousness and nature.
The laws of nature is the law of us. You might break a contract but you don't break THE LAW!!
@rbmac02 to science you don't have to believe but search for all logical options and it's always healthy to have opposition. century ago people find out there is many other galaxies 5.5 centuries kopernikus thought sun is the center of universe. we still don't know how we people get here. so all this certain conclusion is just by far misleading. i'm not arguing with that. something is happening, but animals they always adapt.only humans are trying change Earth so be very careful how2do
My understanding is that we have already had a one degree increase in the last 100 yrs. We are likely to have another degree increase in the next 30 yrs. By this point the Arctic will be releasing tons of methane from the perma-frost... so we will likely see another 1 degree rise in less than 30 yrs. So in 60 yrs we will have a 2 degree rise. I am 50, so I can expect to see a on degree rise. If you are 20 yrs old, then you will likely have to attempt to live through a 2 degree rise... good luck
Wow... I read some of the responses to this video and was surprised. I would have thought people using the internet, watching documentaries, etc would have been smarter and better able to synthesis complexity. The sad fact is that by the time the environment is degraded enough for fools to believe that man's use of fossil fuels have effected the climate... it will be to late to stop it.
@hyperstone6 I don't believe in neither (to be quite honest). Certainly,, the climate is changing but I don't see the human role in it. Did you know that Greenland was colonised by the Vikings because it was literary a green land ? Have you ever heard of something called "the Little Ice Age" (only a couple of centuries later). Surely you have seen the paintings by Avercamp ? Did you know that grapes (for wine) were grown in London and even more to the north during the Middle Ages?
@AmersfoortTristan Here's an article about scientific concensus on the subject: en . wikipedia . org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change (remove the spaces).
Besides, It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what emitting co2 24/7 for over a century throughout the whole planet would do. I suggest you educate yourself.
"I don't see the human role in it". scientific opinion > your opinion.
i disagree w this documentary. humans are a very small factor, in large scale of things, it happens, the planet goes through these cycles all the time... the only reason were making a big deal of it, is because it clashes with our lifestyles. but, uit happens.
thats arguable, its been proven that man created the dust bowl of the early 20th century in the US by cutting down the forests too fast and over working the land.
Europeans by the end of the 15th century had cut down an overwhelming portion of their forests and changed their environments big time.
I believe man is capable of extreme stupidity, so Im never surprised by how far badly we fuck up.
They can't figure out the weather two days from now accurately, how can they predict 100 years LOL!! People do need to be controlled though. We are a very selfish race and fear seems to be the only way to keep us in check. Whether it be fear of god or fear of global warming.
I think this is the globalists trying to mitigate the waste of and pollution that humans make. Global warming is bunk, but the millions of tons of crap we dump onto the ground/water/air every day isn't.
@jebes909090 "They can't figure out the weather two days from now accurately, how can they predict 100 years"
This really is one of the lamest arguments made by climate change deniers. The people who predict the weather 2 days from now are Meteorologists, many of whom are climate change skeptics. The people who are doing the climate change research are Climatologists. Meteorologists tend to doubt global warming because they aren't looking at the longterm models.
@arendr First of all drop the cliché climate change denier phrase. Its one of those brain washing rally behind terms that one side or the other seems to use. Second i said global warming not climate change. No one doubts climate change. Climate change is the new term that these people use because global warming was disproven at or at least put into serious doubt. They proved that people were tampering with the climate records to prove there WAS global warming. Climate gate
@jebes909090 Knowing how piss poor the Dutch Met Office is in predicting the weather 48 hours ahead... I wonder how on earth they would like to predict the weather 20, 40, 60, 100 years in advance. This program is pure propaganda.
alarmist crap doom on you doom on you global warming is causing floods drought storms i think your full of shit if the poles have melted why hasn't the sea risen because it hasn't i live near the sea and the sea is where it always is so blow it out your arse
@vmgqie if sea ice melts, sea levels go down (like when ice in a glass of water melts, the water level goes down) if glacial ice melts (which it is starting to) then sea levels will rise, also it is due to the thermal expansion of seawater that sea levels will rise. not that you will listen to anything i have to say..
@vmgqie I totally with you. Jesus Father, God, created everything to be the way it is; to change appropriately over time; and to have some flactuations now and then.
To imagine he don't know what he's doing and some Libral scientists know the earth better? That's just stupid. Real knowledge is in the Bible, which tells about the FLOOD that created the Grand Canyon, etc., much more severe events than what these modern day Global Warming hoaxters are saying. Everything is in the Bible!
this is absolute b.s. ... its the SUN causing climate change, yes we may have a SMALL factor, but what these guys arent telling u, is that the earths temperature has fluctuated on countless occasions. our planet's temperature is EXPECTED to increase. ... WAKE UP WORLD!
@fallopium911 Actually there's plenty of evidence, they even SHOWED evidence in this documentary such as measuring the different levels of ice, similar to how they calculate the age and health of trees. You're just too fucking stupid to understand or care for the evidence presented.
@Xadreos Wow you make such a strong case. Did they teach you in school that the way to win an argument is to state your argument, Use the subject matter in debate to back up your argument and then refer to your opponent as fucking stupid? Its a great tactic. Allow me to retort. measuring ice only tells us that the ice has melted, this alone proves nothing except that one fact.Remember climate gate? when we discovered the science had be skewed mostly by Allen Jones to show global warming.
@fallopium911 Lol, you addressed an environmental video with an ad-hominem attack expecting no one to take it personally? Wouldn't you say it's a tad hypocritical to attack my argument when you started off having not presented one?
I also understand statistics can be skewed, but I understand that if you look at the satellite imaging over the past 10 years, you can see that the permafrost which has been around for thousands of years is melting at a substantial rate. Why is that?
@Xadreos Well as we know the permafrost on all the planets in our solar system has also melted. This would therefore suggest that the cause of this warming was the giant ball of burning hydrogen, which also just happened to be in a period of no sun spots. Of course that is all over now and the earth is once again cooling which means the propaganda name was changed from Global warming to Global climate change. My argument is not that climate is not changing but that we are not responsible for it.
@fallopium911 Also, what about the global imaging from satellites over the past decade that shows the dramatic melting of the north and south poles? You don't think if those massive regions of ice continue to melt that flooding isn't going to be felt EVERYWHERE? The permafrosts also contain large amounts of methane and CO2, there is evidence of this, and that they both can function similar in effect to a magnifying glass.
@Xadreos You seem a very angry person. if it makes you feel better to think that our meager species can somehow alter this incredible planets weather just with a few naturally created CO2 molecules then I leave you to your belief and your anger. I just wanted to point out that calling someone fucking stupid is neither an argument or productive. It is how children solve problems and I am no longer a child. Thank you for taking the time to read my comments.
@fallopium911 to paraphrase Sir Paul Nurse, would you go against the overwhelming scientific consensus on another subject, such as evolution? cancer treatment? why is manmade global warming different? there may be a small number of scientists working individually or in small groups who go against the consensus, but there are NO large, prestigious, internationally recognised labs who disagree with the overwhelming amount of data which is pro mmcc.
@CriedForTheMoon Let me state that I am not religious. After having studied the evolution theory in depth I do question its validity. I think it is misrepresented. I also find treating cancer with chemo therapy barbaric and have seen cancer cured using less invasive methods. I would like to refer again to Climate Gate where it was shown that the large internationally recognized labs were purposefully skewing the data so it would show global warming. So YES I would go against.
@CriedForTheMoon I also want to point out one more time that even these "large, prestigious, internationally recognised labs" have changed their tune and they are no longer calling this global warming. Since the warming stopped! Its now global climate change. I will not be bullied into submission to accept that which cannot be proven. common sense dictates that large labs are those most likely to be bought off by corporate interests!
@fallopium911 i was wrong, there is 1 'internationally recognised' group that still supports your views, the American Association of Petroleum Geologists..
i just see the vast amount of peer reviewed material on the subject and think that anyone going against it must have a personal agenda. oh and Iain Stewart is actually my tutor, so i guess i would side with his views on the subject..
@CriedForTheMoon the fact that Iain Stewart, is your tutor? ... just give you a bias opinion. and for that fact alone, i dont believe you should have a right to comment your opinion on the matter.
@GoodFellows420 gives me the right to comment on this?! at least i study the subject and read the published read peer review literature. can you honestly say you have studied it? (reading up about it on the internet and studying it are two completley different things).
based on your logic, you shouldnt have the 'right' to comment on a video which is contrary to your views, but i accept your (wrong) opinion, and dont have a problem in you sharing it on a public channel.
'Climategate' lol, hacked private emails discussing which data is relevant and which either isnt or may not be? James Delingpole (he is a slimy, writhing, worm) twisted those emails to his personal agenda then published a stream of cr*p in the telegraph which some people seem to take as fact. no peer review, no fact.
@fallopium911 And no, I don't even know who Allan jones is, I do however know that a large majority of the scientific community accepts global warming because it IS in fact supported by a ton of evidence. When you can SEE it happening in real time, when you can take a CO2 sample of the air now as compared to a sample from say 30 years ago and see that it has increased by more than 10% then it becomes almost common knowledge. If you disagree though, what's your evidence to counter it?
@Xadreos Alan Jones is the main scientist said community and he has been found to have altered computer models to show global effects that dont exist and will not exist as a result of humans living on earth and creating CO2. I would suggest you look up the climate gate before you go any further. I also would like to point out that I am not arguing that climate change doesnt exist only that we have nothing to do with it and saying we do is just part of a eugenics program.
This is just a propoganda piece. There is no evidence at all that there has been any sort of change to our would that could have been caused by us. Infact Global warming which was caused by the SUN ! has now stopped that is why these so called scientists are now calling it Global climate change. Hahahahaha you would have to be a moron to believe this crap, its just a typical eugenics plan with the added bonus of being able to tax the world.
All the solutions provided in the documentary would be possible and implemented IF our society, political and economic systems are driven by reasons and Science.
Sadly that is hardly what it is in reality these days. So ... good luck to all of us ..
Thanks for the upload btw. You are doing something good to the world. :)
What a load of crap! Would you like some Socialism with your carbon tax sir...... Open your eyes, government weather modification is the cause of this fairy tale...
POWERMUSICMAN 1 week ago
@POWERMUSICMAN what has scientific evidence got to do with socialism?
lanceawatt 1 week ago
@POWERMUSICMAN WTF
aguyfromnorwayReal 3 days ago
This CO2 warming propaganda is just voodoo science. Instead check out the cosmic ray theory by Svensmark et al (can find the video here on youtube), the Church of Global Warming video and the Great Global Warming Swindle. There has been no warming for the past 15 years and actually earlier this winter it got soo cold that I saw socialists walking around with their hands in their own pockets!
runarolsen 1 week ago
@runarolsen your arguement is weak.
Data can not be taken from a specific place or instance for reliable evaluation. It is the pattern that emerges from varying data that gives a scientific hypothesis credit, at least in this instance. Socialism I dont understand it isnt relevant.
lanceawatt 1 week ago
@lanceawatt - My argument is just fine. I´m obviously not going to explain the whole thin in 500 word comment on youtube but if you are interested I suggests starting here
wattsupwiththat (.) com/2012/02/26/the-skeptics-case/
runarolsen 1 week ago
I'm not denying Global Warming/Cooling but it has happened before and its going to keep happening. The World is aways heating up and cooling down. We may be speeding up the process but the planet can and will reset its self. Even if the human race becomes extinct the World its self will still be here.
AndrewMarron 1 week ago
Global warming the latest non issue du jour. No increased warming int he past 15 years, yeppers this is a real problem.
Dodger481 1 week ago
I am very surprised by comments writen here.
BBC is a reputable station and broadcasts a lot of great documentaries. Are you all scientist that you can say they are all wrong and its just propaganda? hm.
VJMCS 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"In 2010, global average temperature was 0.53°C (0.95°F) above the 1961-90 mean. This value is 0.01°C (0.02°F) above the nominal temperature in 2005, and 0.02°C (0.05°F) above 1998." WMO 2011
checkyoursources 1 week ago
bullshit
raderator 1 week ago
it rained this morning..just saying
Ironjagg 1 week ago
tits or GTFO
TheDiving11 2 weeks ago
It isn't just increasing temperatures, it is also ocean acidification.
Snackay 3 weeks ago
14:00 the polar bear has no chance of adapting to the climate change...guess someone didn't pay attention when Darwins Survival of the Fittest Theory was explained in biology class :P
lexsoOr 3 weeks ago
@lexsoOr Polar Bears evolved over an enormous period of time. Sudden changes in climate will eliminate their food supply and cause them to die. Adaptation doesn't happen overnight and humans are disrupting the climate in a very unnatural way.
Snackay 3 weeks ago
propoganda film, the govts. will take taxpayers money to develop all kinds of essential technologies then sell these required gadgets back to the same taxpayers; and lets bio-engineer martian foods so that we can contaminate the food supply causing lots of new disease that will require lots of new medicines and vaccines=when the govt. pays scientists off to say what they want them to say-when the govt. or UN is involved=do not believe a thing that you hear
pugdogy 3 weeks ago
Add what ever you want it will do no good unless we have CMA energy and this world has found not one person willing to help. That means YOU and you will suffer under all political stupidity. God said it's better to live among the meek and lowly then to rule among fools. So why do you follow these parasites. Why are you following these selfishly motivated people? You better wake up before there is no research available for this energy C.M.A. energy we need it now.
CMAenergy 4 weeks ago
i live in canada we could use some heat lol
(but seriously pull ur head outta ur ass and put in some effort)
xVevanVx 1 month ago
For a different view on the topic please also take the time to watch The Great Global Warming Swindle here on Youtube
erlof08 1 month ago
Quote Professor Iain Stewart: "A third of the Earth's surface is devoted to livestock"....Well if two thirds is ocean then this statement is obviously Bullsh1t! Another climate lie...
purchville 1 month ago
@purchville never heard of fish farming have you ...
xVevanVx 1 month ago
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
purchville 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
purchville 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
purchville 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
purchville 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
purchville 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xVevanVx you seriously think that half of the oceans are fish farms? Fish farms are a tiny portion of the oceans in regards to area. I bet you think that half of the Earth's land surface is being mined for minerals too... Check out Google Earth! lol
purchville 3 weeks ago
@purchville Dude are you for real? Two thirds is ocean yes, however, a third of the earth's surface is a 3rd of it's Surface not the whole of the planet. Climate change is not a lie it's fact. The governments of the world are only now owning up to the problem. Sadly it will only be when the media makes the problem a bigger issue that people will care enough. People are blind because it isn't a big enough problem yet, and wont see until it is much to late
Dotsforall 1 week ago
Hi from SPCC LOL
sp20075781 1 month ago
its not depopulation you retard. Noone has to die. People simply need to understand that if they breed like rats, throwing litters of seven and eight children under circumstances in which they cannot even afford to feed themselves, then they will end up living like rats, wallowing in each others feces and ultimately being forced to eat each other. Why are people so stupid, the answer is so simple, the chinese got it right.
damian13531 1 month ago
please-please listen everyone!. we know climate change is real,like it or not. question is r we seriouse about tackling it? look around u and u will notice that Nope we are not serious about it at all. All our politicians care about is how to make a buck and how to win the next election that's it.Therefore they all talk about putting a price on carbon will help. Total rubbish.Instead of such lobbying there are better way to tackle climate change like FRee energy technologies..
kuvceebxab1 1 month ago
This is just one of many other pseudo media scientists who are on the money train, constant fear, maybe and could be prophecies of diasasters and global catashrophes, they're definetly profiting from scare mongering the public of constant destruction. Why hasn't he provided alternative theories on the topic? The science is not over, the debate has not concluded, conviently he forgot to mention the climategate emails and false IPCC data. Do not be taken in by these carbon taxing fraudsters.
mrocean21 1 month ago
We must be able to make these artificial trees then to produce more oxygen?
Oh, and the birds can live in them too, building theyre nest and all, wow :D
ThermalHD 1 month ago
So the artificial trees are going to store up lots of co2, so the trees and vegetation will not get enough themselfs and all die out. Oh we humans are going to ruin everything, we make so much wierd changes to mother earth we will be amazed in the future. :)
ThermalHD 1 month ago
@ThermalHD Are you retarded...the worlds problem is we realise more Co2 than the trees can absorb so how by using the engineered trees would we be harming the environment. The main reason global warming is happening in my eyes is not so much the burning of fossil fuels but more the way we obtain them same with a lot of things we use...the removal of trees and over population will be out biggest downfall.
chaoshawk69 1 month ago
@chaoshawk69 I was thinking, what if those take too much of the co2, and the trees get less or lots less,, then they will die or produce much less oxygen. Trees, plants etc needs co2 dont they ( i think i have heard this on a documentary somewhere)
ThermalHD 1 month ago
@ThermalHD clearly you heard it but didn't pay attention to it. The scientists would know the capacity that each "tree" could hold roughly so while you ignorantly make snide sarcastic remarks all you are doing is making yourself look more and more stupid. I don't know if you heard this part or not as well but but there was a 138 or so higher count of carbon in the atmosphere than back when the world's land mass was majority vegetation not buildings.
chaoshawk69 1 month ago
@ThermalHD So in conclusion to that, if more trees could survive back when there was less carbon in the atmosphere I'm pretty sure they will survive when artificial trees bring the Co2 levels back to how they should be.
chaoshawk69 1 month ago
i have an idea. our earths core is a big ball of hot lava, and the oil we drill out of the ground helps cool that heat from inside the earth. now that we are drilling so much and running out of alot of places to drill. our earth is getting hotter and gonna seize up like a motor would if it ran with no oil.
shortcoursetim 1 month ago
good quality :-) thanks :-)
mi9worm 1 month ago
Comment removed
hahanelsonhaha 1 month ago
@hahanelsonhaha why dont you google what billion means. There is a difference in british and american english. So yeah, dumb as shit and proud iof it, arnt you?
GhostFromTheFuture 1 month ago
@GhostFromTheFuture
Yeah I´am ;D
Sorry man that was really stupid :D
hahanelsonhaha 1 month ago
@hahanelsonhaha but thx for lettin me know :)
hahanelsonhaha 1 month ago
@hahanelsonhaha only ? you kidding me only ?
7 billion is an increase from 3,5 billion on average in pre industrial revolution.
izaccy 1 month ago
Iain's hot!
justmc9 1 month ago
Ummmm... Hmmmmm... Lets Make Plastic "Trees" why not just Plant more Trees & Protect our Rain Forrests???. Also why make Fake Meat? Just stop ... Technology is only mimicking the perfect structures given to us by Nature... I like the ideas behind this Documentary, but am annoyed, by the Technology Quick wannabe fixes...
teva0886 1 month ago
what about the wars that america is waging. dropping bombs. killing toddlers and producing tonnes of carbon dioxide, monoxide and tonnes of other gases. i wonder why these 'great' scientists featured in this documentary are not a shit concerned about that?
zulquarnainanwar 1 month ago
LOL climate change denial is awesome. Mannnnn were so fuckkedd i dont even care anymore?
moofdebowl 1 month ago
I've only seen the first 1.01 minutes, but was'nt the Earth warmer 600 years ago?
sungmoon1987 1 month ago
@sungmoon1987 no it wasn't you fucking asshole
ursodus 1 month ago
Comment removed
sungmoon1987 1 month ago
@ursodus yes it was you loose canon, go read your statistics first and then go to the gym and get all that anger out of you.
sungmoon1987 1 month ago
No talk about the ice-breakers up north?
No talk of chem-trails either? See chem-trails at 6:28 into the video....start it at six minutes and watch how the propaganda works
PhotoMaineAC 1 month ago
this isn't science, this is propaganda. very biased documentary
kingtoadius 1 month ago
They don't call it "TV Programming" for nothing!
Many people need to defragment their minds, do a disk clean-up on their thoughts and reorganize those folders where all of that junk was stored. Start over from scratch and learn how and why there is always someone.....looking to control you?
Who exactly has been programming you people............?
PhotoMaineAC 1 month ago
@kingtoadius 3000 weather records was set in 2011 in US alone and still you watch it with you're own eyes and completely deny what is right infront of you, every proof is right there and still you chose to turn your head the other side, WHY?
Luclinify 1 month ago
@kingtoadius
Biased? Whats the other view? There are only one side to this, as with gravity and the heliosentric world view. Sure you always have some fringe idiots, just as you will always have some holocaust deniers and flat earthers.
The deniers had some sound arguments back in the 90s, but now it has all been refuted by science. Even Koch Industries funded Müller had to change his view at last.
TheSaltyAdmiral 1 month ago
@kingtoadius fucking retard
ursodus 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CRITICISM OF ISRAEL OR ZIONISM....
I-S
N-O-T
A-N-T-I S-E-M-I-T-I-C
But STATE TERRORIST murder of civilians in Palestine, by Israel, is I-N-H-U-M-A-N-E
Hold Israel to account!
ENFORCE peace!
Remove America's veto at the U.N.
(which is always used to protect Israel and its CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY)
BlackRoof 1 month ago
Cons/Right Wingers are right in that EVEN if global warming is happening it is NATURAL.
It is, indeed, very natural, like the existence of Fe, C, H, Co, Au, O, etc. Problem with these ideologues is they THINK they're gonna be okay. Not true.
Earth WILL BE okay, but not homo sapiens. Earth's various cycles of gyrations last 10's of thousands of years. But 2-10 years (#1) of extreme drought or (#2) of volcanic ashes covering much of the earth & BILLIONS of homo sapiens could EASILY perish.
HenryDavidT 1 month ago
@HenryDavidT Thats like saying killing someone is natural, he was going to be dead anyway, right? This global warming is not natural, the effect of changes in solar force in recent decades is small, not enough to cause these changes in our atmosphere.
Luclinify 1 month ago
More evidence/impacts of climate change series..
(please read article before the denier TROLL censors it)..
.
'Venice of Northwest Alaska' sinking because of climate change
.
The permafrost has sunk so much in one Northwest Alaska village that bridges are shifting, outdoor stairways hang over the ground and sagging water pipes are prone to break and freeze. Those are a few of the ways climate change is affecting life in the Inupiat village of Selawik.
.
Anchorage Alaska Dispatch
3 January 2012
Nightversionn 2 months ago
The sun is heating the Earth rapidly
It is 45F in Detroit today Jan1, 2012 no snow in sight
I am a Black woman so the sun loves me and my people
whatever will non-melanated people do
suntan lotion won't help much
too bad
grossda410 2 months ago
@grossda410 The sun will burn you just as easily as it burns any other HUMAN on this earth
blazin20aday 2 months ago
"the sun is heating the earth rapidly"
you probably dont even know why the sun is heating up yet you still give your opinion. anyways, you and your black people will burn as easy as anyone else on this planet should solar flares strike the earth or if temperatures rise significantly at unprecedented levels.im dark brown (mexican) but the sun doesnt look at color even though my ancestors were obsessed with it, it doesnt matter. lets looks for solutions not hate.
BarrioAztrologist89 1 month ago
Mr Thomas Robert Malthus was spot on population growth and foresaw that population reduction was necessary especially among the lower classes & that if population growth would exceed the growth of technology it would lead to disaster and now he is being proved accurate almost 200 years after his death.
It doesn't matter if we reduce our carbon emissions as long as the population continues to grow in the current pace it will continue to lead to disaster. the growth of populations must cease.
SuperZiggy12 2 months ago
@SuperZiggy12 If you suggest that depopulation should occur then you should be one of those who are depopulated... anyways you have no right to decide on who gets to live noone has that right in my opinion
blazin20aday 2 months ago 2
@blazin20aday : ) I love it!
elarrebat 2 months ago
@blazin20aday Well sir. The past 200 years we've seen a rise in populations due to a variety of changes in both socio-economic & technological improvements. However due to a massive improvements in the medical field these changes has turned to the worse & as our resources are finite and being depleted and as we've allowed the lower classes to increase their umber of children especially in the third world we are now seeing the consequence of that. Depopulation is the only answer.
SuperZiggy12 2 months ago
@blazin20aday I do want do continue with that as the western birthrates has plummeted due to improvement in technology, socio-economics & improved education though things has gotten worse in 3rd world countries with increasing birth-rates as a rapid pace and have resulted in devastating effect for both the environment & the Co2 emissions. I do not however argue for an entire eradication of the birth rates, but I'd rather see the implementation of a global birth-right policy.
SuperZiggy12 2 months ago
@SuperZiggy12 simple solutions would work well for example I live in the UK and noticed there's incentive for a woman to get pregnant as the government will give them housing.. needless to say more? also concerning 3rd world countries what is wrong with them using solar power in Africa huge cities can be made using the latest solar panel technologies, why not give it to them. Give people somthing to do to fix things remake everything screw Money its nothing but a prison we created for ourselves.
blazin20aday 2 months ago
The logic seems very simple (1) highest CO2 level in atmosphere in at least 600,000 years (2) high correlation between CO2 concentration and surface temperature... the evidence that the earth is already warming with Arctic/Antarctic melting and glaciers retreating from high mountains... The debate is whether human caused the sharp rise in CO2 level... my question to deniers is if not human, then who?
gaulehero 2 months ago
We are saved ! Long fast energy wise transportation can be made on ... 30 km.
Personnaly i just need a bike or even a pair of runners.
kervennic 2 months ago
Ludd, come back and give us the strength to fight the industrial leviathan before he kills us all.
kervennic 2 months ago
wonderful documantary. bbc is always the best eye opener
2323jpms 2 months ago
Cooling down the documentary with the snow feature. lol
mi9worm 2 months ago
"and three degrees or more warmer before the end of the century", we will hit an ice age by then. Wow this global warming is ultra slow, relax kick back and breath some loving CO2 out.
Or go say its the end of the world...
IRUSIpanzermaster 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Act as if it is human made and hope you are wrong. Something like Pascals wager... You don't want to gamble with the future of humanity and our fellow beings. It's not life after death,your soul or any other supernatural nonsense. It's life itself,the human conscientiousness and nature.
The laws of nature is the law of us. You might break a contract but you don't break THE LAW!!
olai2000 2 months ago
Act as if it is human mad and hope you are wrong. Something like Pascals wager... You don't want to gamble with the future of humanity and our fellow beings. It's not life after death,your soul or any other supernatural nonsense. It's life itself,the human conscientiousness and nature.
The laws of nature is the law of us. You might break a contract but you don't break THE LAW!!
olai2000 2 months ago
Also... there is no real reason arguing with people who don't believe in the science. It is willful ignorance.
rbmac02 2 months ago
@rbmac02 to science you don't have to believe but search for all logical options and it's always healthy to have opposition. century ago people find out there is many other galaxies 5.5 centuries kopernikus thought sun is the center of universe. we still don't know how we people get here. so all this certain conclusion is just by far misleading. i'm not arguing with that. something is happening, but animals they always adapt.only humans are trying change Earth so be very careful how2do
tammas789 2 months ago
My understanding is that we have already had a one degree increase in the last 100 yrs. We are likely to have another degree increase in the next 30 yrs. By this point the Arctic will be releasing tons of methane from the perma-frost... so we will likely see another 1 degree rise in less than 30 yrs. So in 60 yrs we will have a 2 degree rise. I am 50, so I can expect to see a on degree rise. If you are 20 yrs old, then you will likely have to attempt to live through a 2 degree rise... good luck
rbmac02 2 months ago
Wow... I read some of the responses to this video and was surprised. I would have thought people using the internet, watching documentaries, etc would have been smarter and better able to synthesis complexity. The sad fact is that by the time the environment is degraded enough for fools to believe that man's use of fossil fuels have effected the climate... it will be to late to stop it.
rbmac02 2 months ago
I may say whatever might happen we must be responsible in everything we are doing.
ryanq515 3 months ago
4 climate change deniers rather believe in the Easter bunny than science.
(Embarrassing fact about them exposed!). =)
hyperstone6 3 months ago
@hyperstone6 I don't believe in neither (to be quite honest). Certainly,, the climate is changing but I don't see the human role in it. Did you know that Greenland was colonised by the Vikings because it was literary a green land ? Have you ever heard of something called "the Little Ice Age" (only a couple of centuries later). Surely you have seen the paintings by Avercamp ? Did you know that grapes (for wine) were grown in London and even more to the north during the Middle Ages?
AmersfoortTristan 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AmersfoortTristan Here's an article about scientific concensus on the subject: en . wikipedia . org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change (remove the spaces).
Besides, It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what emitting co2 24/7 for over a century throughout the whole planet would do. I suggest you educate yourself.
"I don't see the human role in it". scientific opinion > your opinion.
hyperstone6 2 months ago
@AmersfoortTristan Eirik Raude was promoting not informing.
olai2000 2 months ago
i disagree w this documentary. humans are a very small factor, in large scale of things, it happens, the planet goes through these cycles all the time... the only reason were making a big deal of it, is because it clashes with our lifestyles. but, uit happens.
GoodFellows420 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodFellows420
thats arguable, its been proven that man created the dust bowl of the early 20th century in the US by cutting down the forests too fast and over working the land.
Europeans by the end of the 15th century had cut down an overwhelming portion of their forests and changed their environments big time.
I believe man is capable of extreme stupidity, so Im never surprised by how far badly we fuck up.
USMarineRifleman0311 3 months ago
They can't figure out the weather two days from now accurately, how can they predict 100 years LOL!! People do need to be controlled though. We are a very selfish race and fear seems to be the only way to keep us in check. Whether it be fear of god or fear of global warming.
I think this is the globalists trying to mitigate the waste of and pollution that humans make. Global warming is bunk, but the millions of tons of crap we dump onto the ground/water/air every day isn't.
jebes909090 3 months ago
@jebes909090 "They can't figure out the weather two days from now accurately, how can they predict 100 years"
This really is one of the lamest arguments made by climate change deniers. The people who predict the weather 2 days from now are Meteorologists, many of whom are climate change skeptics. The people who are doing the climate change research are Climatologists. Meteorologists tend to doubt global warming because they aren't looking at the longterm models.
arendr 3 months ago
@arendr First of all drop the cliché climate change denier phrase. Its one of those brain washing rally behind terms that one side or the other seems to use. Second i said global warming not climate change. No one doubts climate change. Climate change is the new term that these people use because global warming was disproven at or at least put into serious doubt. They proved that people were tampering with the climate records to prove there WAS global warming. Climate gate
jebes909090 3 months ago
@jebes909090 Knowing how piss poor the Dutch Met Office is in predicting the weather 48 hours ahead... I wonder how on earth they would like to predict the weather 20, 40, 60, 100 years in advance. This program is pure propaganda.
AmersfoortTristan 2 months ago
global warming is great the warmer the less sheilas wear bloody fantastis
vmgqie 3 months ago
alarmist crap doom on you doom on you global warming is causing floods drought storms i think your full of shit if the poles have melted why hasn't the sea risen because it hasn't i live near the sea and the sea is where it always is so blow it out your arse
vmgqie 3 months ago
@vmgqie if sea ice melts, sea levels go down (like when ice in a glass of water melts, the water level goes down) if glacial ice melts (which it is starting to) then sea levels will rise, also it is due to the thermal expansion of seawater that sea levels will rise. not that you will listen to anything i have to say..
CriedForTheMoon 3 months ago
@vmgqie I totally with you. Jesus Father, God, created everything to be the way it is; to change appropriately over time; and to have some flactuations now and then.
To imagine he don't know what he's doing and some Libral scientists know the earth better? That's just stupid. Real knowledge is in the Bible, which tells about the FLOOD that created the Grand Canyon, etc., much more severe events than what these modern day Global Warming hoaxters are saying. Everything is in the Bible!
HenryDavidT 3 months ago
@HenryDavidT Your god never existed, it a story in a book written by primitive men that knew nothing of the sciences of the world we now live in.
No magic man will save you from your own stupidity.
You think that the world was made by magic just for you to abuse.
If you are not a living part of this planet then fuck of and live with your fantasy and don't watch videos like this.
Your bible is just words in a book
non of it is relevant to today.
dubldeka 3 months ago
this is absolute b.s. ... its the SUN causing climate change, yes we may have a SMALL factor, but what these guys arent telling u, is that the earths temperature has fluctuated on countless occasions. our planet's temperature is EXPECTED to increase. ... WAKE UP WORLD!
GoodFellows420 3 months ago
@GoodFellows420 At 3:30 minutes they actually do mention earths temperature fluctuations... other wise known as temperature cycles.
ReverendOhm 3 months ago
@fallopium911 Actually there's plenty of evidence, they even SHOWED evidence in this documentary such as measuring the different levels of ice, similar to how they calculate the age and health of trees. You're just too fucking stupid to understand or care for the evidence presented.
Xadreos 4 months ago
@Xadreos Wow you make such a strong case. Did they teach you in school that the way to win an argument is to state your argument, Use the subject matter in debate to back up your argument and then refer to your opponent as fucking stupid? Its a great tactic. Allow me to retort. measuring ice only tells us that the ice has melted, this alone proves nothing except that one fact.Remember climate gate? when we discovered the science had be skewed mostly by Allen Jones to show global warming.
fallopium911 3 months ago
@fallopium911 Lol, you addressed an environmental video with an ad-hominem attack expecting no one to take it personally? Wouldn't you say it's a tad hypocritical to attack my argument when you started off having not presented one?
I also understand statistics can be skewed, but I understand that if you look at the satellite imaging over the past 10 years, you can see that the permafrost which has been around for thousands of years is melting at a substantial rate. Why is that?
Xadreos 3 months ago
@Xadreos Well as we know the permafrost on all the planets in our solar system has also melted. This would therefore suggest that the cause of this warming was the giant ball of burning hydrogen, which also just happened to be in a period of no sun spots. Of course that is all over now and the earth is once again cooling which means the propaganda name was changed from Global warming to Global climate change. My argument is not that climate is not changing but that we are not responsible for it.
fallopium911 3 months ago
@fallopium911 Also, what about the global imaging from satellites over the past decade that shows the dramatic melting of the north and south poles? You don't think if those massive regions of ice continue to melt that flooding isn't going to be felt EVERYWHERE? The permafrosts also contain large amounts of methane and CO2, there is evidence of this, and that they both can function similar in effect to a magnifying glass.
Xadreos 3 months ago
@Xadreos You seem a very angry person. if it makes you feel better to think that our meager species can somehow alter this incredible planets weather just with a few naturally created CO2 molecules then I leave you to your belief and your anger. I just wanted to point out that calling someone fucking stupid is neither an argument or productive. It is how children solve problems and I am no longer a child. Thank you for taking the time to read my comments.
fallopium911 3 months ago
@fallopium911 to paraphrase Sir Paul Nurse, would you go against the overwhelming scientific consensus on another subject, such as evolution? cancer treatment? why is manmade global warming different? there may be a small number of scientists working individually or in small groups who go against the consensus, but there are NO large, prestigious, internationally recognised labs who disagree with the overwhelming amount of data which is pro mmcc.
CriedForTheMoon 3 months ago
@CriedForTheMoon Let me state that I am not religious. After having studied the evolution theory in depth I do question its validity. I think it is misrepresented. I also find treating cancer with chemo therapy barbaric and have seen cancer cured using less invasive methods. I would like to refer again to Climate Gate where it was shown that the large internationally recognized labs were purposefully skewing the data so it would show global warming. So YES I would go against.
fallopium911 3 months ago
@fallopium911 im with you.
GoodFellows420 3 months ago
@CriedForTheMoon I also want to point out one more time that even these "large, prestigious, internationally recognised labs" have changed their tune and they are no longer calling this global warming. Since the warming stopped! Its now global climate change. I will not be bullied into submission to accept that which cannot be proven. common sense dictates that large labs are those most likely to be bought off by corporate interests!
fallopium911 3 months ago
@fallopium911 i was wrong, there is 1 'internationally recognised' group that still supports your views, the American Association of Petroleum Geologists..
i just see the vast amount of peer reviewed material on the subject and think that anyone going against it must have a personal agenda. oh and Iain Stewart is actually my tutor, so i guess i would side with his views on the subject..
CriedForTheMoon 3 months ago
@CriedForTheMoon the fact that Iain Stewart, is your tutor? ... just give you a bias opinion. and for that fact alone, i dont believe you should have a right to comment your opinion on the matter.
GoodFellows420 3 months ago
@GoodFellows420 gives me the right to comment on this?! at least i study the subject and read the published read peer review literature. can you honestly say you have studied it? (reading up about it on the internet and studying it are two completley different things).
based on your logic, you shouldnt have the 'right' to comment on a video which is contrary to your views, but i accept your (wrong) opinion, and dont have a problem in you sharing it on a public channel.
CriedForTheMoon 3 months ago
'Climategate' lol, hacked private emails discussing which data is relevant and which either isnt or may not be? James Delingpole (he is a slimy, writhing, worm) twisted those emails to his personal agenda then published a stream of cr*p in the telegraph which some people seem to take as fact. no peer review, no fact.
CriedForTheMoon 3 months ago
@fallopium911 And no, I don't even know who Allan jones is, I do however know that a large majority of the scientific community accepts global warming because it IS in fact supported by a ton of evidence. When you can SEE it happening in real time, when you can take a CO2 sample of the air now as compared to a sample from say 30 years ago and see that it has increased by more than 10% then it becomes almost common knowledge. If you disagree though, what's your evidence to counter it?
Xadreos 3 months ago
@Xadreos Alan Jones is the main scientist said community and he has been found to have altered computer models to show global effects that dont exist and will not exist as a result of humans living on earth and creating CO2. I would suggest you look up the climate gate before you go any further. I also would like to point out that I am not arguing that climate change doesnt exist only that we have nothing to do with it and saying we do is just part of a eugenics program.
fallopium911 3 months ago
he has a shitty accent
billyboy8888 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@billyboy8888 Really ?! That's all you have to say about the documentary ?! .....
serip 3 months ago
This is just a propoganda piece. There is no evidence at all that there has been any sort of change to our would that could have been caused by us. Infact Global warming which was caused by the SUN ! has now stopped that is why these so called scientists are now calling it Global climate change. Hahahahaha you would have to be a moron to believe this crap, its just a typical eugenics plan with the added bonus of being able to tax the world.
fallopium911 4 months ago
Comment removed
Xadreos 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fallopium911 Is money all you care about you conservative twat ?
IC1101 4 months ago
@fallopium911 this is a very useful channel for all those interested in real science : greenman3610
"Climate Denial Crock of the Week" /user/greenman3610
nbj01 3 months ago
@nbj01 Thank you! I can tell I am going to be on this page for a couple of days at least!
fallopium911 3 months ago
All the solutions provided in the documentary would be possible and implemented IF our society, political and economic systems are driven by reasons and Science.
Sadly that is hardly what it is in reality these days. So ... good luck to all of us ..
Thanks for the upload btw. You are doing something good to the world. :)
ktawut 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@ktawut -- Ron Paul says end the EPA -- and pollution laws should be TOUGHER!
/watch?v=XsZ6-2BdpIQ
Learn about United Nations Agenda 21 for the true agenda behind the carbon tax -- global government.
As far as world's poor/immigration check: /watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
global government = global poverty
vechorik 4 months ago