hahaha i love how everyone in this world has gone soft fuck animals kill em' all who gives a damn big small in between but the fact is all i just did there is voice my opinion just like you all did it make a difference? no!!! no one cares about how sensitive you are video responses aren't for whining get over it.
In the U.S. we beat the shit out of people mess with us while hunting. England must have a lot of pussies if this was bad. We buy a lot of guns from burmingham.
id drop that shooter where he stood the dickhead, iv been gameing for about 2 years and never come across anybody as aggressive and as childish as hime. tottal dick head, he would of seen the end of my barrel if he spoke to me like that.
4 fuk sake we go out shooting for fun at the end of the day the guns take some pheasants and the beaters do the same...and what is left is taken to the gamedealers to be sold at the farmers market or at the butchers!
i can understand that some people find shooting cruel...but its an english tradition so fuk of u cunts.............
Killing for fun is obviously addictive - this is why people become so agressive when asked to stop. Perhaps these people need some help so they can learn to live their lives without the thrill of the kill.
These hunters are inbreds only sick people get pleasure from killing things, go clay pigeon shooting insted. The royals kill everything that moves because they have reptilian brains so have no conscience. you watch Prince william is tha anti-christ and will be world leader by 2015. NWO, illuminati must be stopped.
This just proves to me that these people aren't hunting for 'food' - they are aggressive, dangerous bigots. I can't see any argument in their defense. Okay it might be annoying for someone to start filming you, but it doesn't justify threats in the slightest. It makes me sick to be living in the same country as these idiots.
fuckin inbread cunt id love to twat him, n before u say i live in the country. People have to have the right to film and shoot, i hate peeps who hurt animals less its for food, anything other than food just lay down n die, comersial farming doesnt count find another way to control so called vermin! You gotta have the right to hunt if ya want for food tho, there should always be lots countryside full of food i believe, yum yum. BTW that aggressive bloke is a wife beater
Really? Out of curiosity for what? Was he hunting on land without consent or was he a fool and damaged the camera? Even thought his actions toward the cameraman where hostile and I certainly don't approve it's not like he assaulted him and he was provoked, this is such a minor confrontation I am surprised it even went to court especially as both parties broke laws.
i personally would have took the camera from him and shoved it up his ass, antis are nothing but a waste space and no matter what they do hunting and shooting will always go on. pity they dont channel there time and energy in to stopping peodophiles.
Not true. He doesn't need their permission to film them; they are clearly visible from public land. I'm not sure what definition of "spying" you are using here, but there's no evidence of espionage that I can see. And if they want to apply for a restraining order, then let them do it, rather than taking the law into their own hands. More polite? They aren't polite at all as far as I can tell.
they needed to of handled the issue with restraint instead of aggression, thought they where provoked by the filming. If you want to film someone you must gain their consent, the person on film can take the cameraman to court and have it destroyed, have them blurred out or get paid a royalty. he can film them for his own viewing but not for public viewing or corperat work.
i can see two shooters here, one with a gun, legally shooting on permission. The other shooting a camera,where's the difference? the one with the gun kills a bird for the table to be eaten, the other looking for a reaction which he gets. Ask yourself who's enjoying it the most, the cameraman. He got the reaction he wanted, the man with the gun is the one being hunted/stalked and under the most duress
I have no idea who's enjoying anything here, but that's hardly the point. There is more than one man with a gun, of course, and I don't know how you know the cameraman wants this reaction. I think too that being assaulted, shouted at and threatened etc would qualify as significant duress, whereas being filmed from a distance is less so, unless you're using a definition of this term of which I am unaware.
Whose veal and McNuggets? Never touch the stuff. Personally I don't have a problem with pheasant hunting; I do care, though, about people who act as if our laws don't apply to them. If there's a right to shoot, there's also a right for someone to say what they think of it.
I agree, sorry, I wasnt aiming that directly at your comments, I just replied to yours by accident, I should have added my own comment.
In this case, the game keeper acted out of place, which doesnt exactly encourage the promotion of game shooting, though thats down to person rather than profession.
It's comforting to know that the law is firmly on the side of the photographer. I count several criminal offences by the guys with the guns: threatening behaviour, assault, attempted robbery (trying to taking the photographer's film). Maybe property damage and disorderly conduct to boot?
I am not supporting the actions of either man as they both broke the law however in court it would be argued the hunter was provoked where as the camera man chose to harrass. just because he has a camera does not mean he can invade other peoples privacy.
And that argument would likely fail, as filming is not necessarily the same as harrasment. Are you being harrassed when you are on CCTV at the shopping centre?
Day in day out, the same people that call for more organic & less intensively farmed food, start pumping their gums about field sports, eh? Well go figure. These are not migrating songbirds they are food. Organic, hand reared free-living food, on land cared for and maintained by rural community for the rural community. Do not judge what you don't understand. If you want something to moan about, try chicken-nuggets.
Organic???? They aren't reared on organic food, and they are now being reared in battery cages. Looks like its you who doesn't know what they are talking about.
The video isn't to highlight pheasant shooting its to highlight the despicable behaviour of the chairman of the national gamekeepers association.
Traindriver666 .....actually admits that he is a tweed wearing cretin! Case closed !
Sounds to me that he was the guy who would walk around stealing people's sweets in the playground too...until someone stood up to him and broke his nose and sent him running to the teacher. Men with guns ...quite possibly the weakest link in the human gene pool.
Great job! That's exactly the kind of reaction I'd expect from someone who kills for fun. Unfortunately most people are also totally disinformed about the huge number of human victims caused by this brutal, dangerous, unfair and useless "sport". Sadly unters can't be banned because they're supported by weapon industry lobby which uses the "sportsgun" sale as an alibi to justify their existence and hide its real trade, war.
Not well handled, but LACS are a not the most tactful people either. The shooting industry is not a cruel one - plus it employs thousands of people and ploughs millions into rural economies that really need it.
Gamekeepers have the highest suicide rate next to vets because of the pressure to deliver - but shooting puts more money to conservation than anything else. There is real fear in the countryside that we and out children will be attacked or killed by animal rights extremists. One man with a camera could quietly get enough pictures to wipe out your whole family.
Unfortunately the British countryside is riddled with these spineless, arrogant, tweed wearing cretins.They feel safe in numbers - but when alone they have no balls- I've seen it time and time again. The real dregs of humanity . KEEP FILMING . Excellent work.
hahaha i love how everyone in this world has gone soft fuck animals kill em' all who gives a damn big small in between but the fact is all i just did there is voice my opinion just like you all did it make a difference? no!!! no one cares about how sensitive you are video responses aren't for whining get over it.
Ltsm1ley 3 years ago
Another human killer in the making.
Exposingthem 3 years ago
if it's for food, i can tolerate, but if it's just to simply kill for fun sake then these fuckers need to face the same treatment.
rezzoro 3 years ago
When did bird hunting become cruel?
EDB0223 3 years ago
Kudos to the cameraman! I would have been scared as hell with all these retards. Having an IQ below 75 and toting a gun is a dangerous combination..
sommersonnenwenden 3 years ago
In the U.S. we beat the shit out of people mess with us while hunting. England must have a lot of pussies if this was bad. We buy a lot of guns from burmingham.
EDB0223 3 years ago
id drop that shooter where he stood the dickhead, iv been gameing for about 2 years and never come across anybody as aggressive and as childish as hime. tottal dick head, he would of seen the end of my barrel if he spoke to me like that.
mark2342003 4 years ago
4 fuk sake we go out shooting for fun at the end of the day the guns take some pheasants and the beaters do the same...and what is left is taken to the gamedealers to be sold at the farmers market or at the butchers!
i can understand that some people find shooting cruel...but its an english tradition so fuk of u cunts.............
stubbles07 4 years ago
You said it all....'for FUN'!
acigawis 4 years ago
Thats was interesting to say the least!!!
lt543 4 years ago
Killing for fun is obviously addictive - this is why people become so agressive when asked to stop. Perhaps these people need some help so they can learn to live their lives without the thrill of the kill.
fjay62 4 years ago
These hunters are inbreds only sick people get pleasure from killing things, go clay pigeon shooting insted. The royals kill everything that moves because they have reptilian brains so have no conscience. you watch Prince william is tha anti-christ and will be world leader by 2015. NWO, illuminati must be stopped.
MrMikeHunt 4 years ago
I would of kicked the shit out of the guy with the camera, he has no right to be there.
striketeam100 4 years ago
He has every right!
acigawis 4 years ago
This just proves to me that these people aren't hunting for 'food' - they are aggressive, dangerous bigots. I can't see any argument in their defense. Okay it might be annoying for someone to start filming you, but it doesn't justify threats in the slightest. It makes me sick to be living in the same country as these idiots.
logosthedestroyer 4 years ago
Much as I hate all the anti hunting bigots such as the "League against cruel sports", that game keeper was being an aggressive idiot.
ORBEX 4 years ago
fuckin inbread cunt id love to twat him, n before u say i live in the country. People have to have the right to film and shoot, i hate peeps who hurt animals less its for food, anything other than food just lay down n die, comersial farming doesnt count find another way to control so called vermin! You gotta have the right to hunt if ya want for food tho, there should always be lots countryside full of food i believe, yum yum. BTW that aggressive bloke is a wife beater
Skonkkongkushka 4 years ago
lol ok thats a lie i just want you to hate him
Skonkkongkushka 4 years ago
that old beater lol"dont take pictures of me or i will stick that camera up your arse" ha,ha quality.
hoothootferreter 4 years ago
see even on here you are nasty little violent scum, with no self control.
blackvelvetoriginal 4 years ago
id fugin kick shit outa the stupid anti
beddiewhippet 4 years ago
Really? Out of curiosity for what? Was he hunting on land without consent or was he a fool and damaged the camera? Even thought his actions toward the cameraman where hostile and I certainly don't approve it's not like he assaulted him and he was provoked, this is such a minor confrontation I am surprised it even went to court especially as both parties broke laws.
milesoverton 4 years ago
Threatening behaviour and common assault.
I really don't see how he gamekeeper was provoked, it is legal to film in a public place.
The cameraman didn't break the law at all.
acigawis 4 years ago
i personally would have took the camera from him and shoved it up his ass, antis are nothing but a waste space and no matter what they do hunting and shooting will always go on. pity they dont channel there time and energy in to stopping peodophiles.
workingdogs07 4 years ago
The shooters could also channel their time better and stop paedophiles, instead of killing innocent creature.
Exposingthem 4 years ago
Not true. He doesn't need their permission to film them; they are clearly visible from public land. I'm not sure what definition of "spying" you are using here, but there's no evidence of espionage that I can see. And if they want to apply for a restraining order, then let them do it, rather than taking the law into their own hands. More polite? They aren't polite at all as far as I can tell.
rederic2004 4 years ago
they needed to of handled the issue with restraint instead of aggression, thought they where provoked by the filming. If you want to film someone you must gain their consent, the person on film can take the cameraman to court and have it destroyed, have them blurred out or get paid a royalty. he can film them for his own viewing but not for public viewing or corperat work.
milesoverton 4 years ago
i can see two shooters here, one with a gun, legally shooting on permission. The other shooting a camera,where's the difference? the one with the gun kills a bird for the table to be eaten, the other looking for a reaction which he gets. Ask yourself who's enjoying it the most, the cameraman. He got the reaction he wanted, the man with the gun is the one being hunted/stalked and under the most duress
craftycarper2007 4 years ago
I have no idea who's enjoying anything here, but that's hardly the point. There is more than one man with a gun, of course, and I don't know how you know the cameraman wants this reaction. I think too that being assaulted, shouted at and threatened etc would qualify as significant duress, whereas being filmed from a distance is less so, unless you're using a definition of this term of which I am unaware.
rederic2004 4 years ago
Whose veal and McNuggets? Never touch the stuff. Personally I don't have a problem with pheasant hunting; I do care, though, about people who act as if our laws don't apply to them. If there's a right to shoot, there's also a right for someone to say what they think of it.
rederic2004 4 years ago
I agree, sorry, I wasnt aiming that directly at your comments, I just replied to yours by accident, I should have added my own comment.
In this case, the game keeper acted out of place, which doesnt exactly encourage the promotion of game shooting, though thats down to person rather than profession.
jhoulder1 4 years ago
It's comforting to know that the law is firmly on the side of the photographer. I count several criminal offences by the guys with the guns: threatening behaviour, assault, attempted robbery (trying to taking the photographer's film). Maybe property damage and disorderly conduct to boot?
rederic2004 4 years ago
I am not supporting the actions of either man as they both broke the law however in court it would be argued the hunter was provoked where as the camera man chose to harrass. just because he has a camera does not mean he can invade other peoples privacy.
milesoverton 4 years ago
And that argument would likely fail, as filming is not necessarily the same as harrasment. Are you being harrassed when you are on CCTV at the shopping centre?
rederic2004 4 years ago
It's not illegal to film in a public place.
The gamekeeper was taken to court and found guilty
acigawis 4 years ago
lurcherboy......I doubt if you could punch a hole in a wet newspaper....... stick to acting tough on rabbits, it's about your level.
rrbh 4 years ago
I would have beat the animal fucker to a coma. But thats just me :)
Lurcherboy1906 4 years ago
There is not enough shooting/killing for me to be convinced this is animal suffering.
ZEFFERING 4 years ago
Its not illegal to film people or take photos. If you can tell us where its illegal I'm sure we'd stop.
Anyway what they got to worry about if they are taking part in a legal activate?
Exposingthem 4 years ago
Day in day out, the same people that call for more organic & less intensively farmed food, start pumping their gums about field sports, eh? Well go figure. These are not migrating songbirds they are food. Organic, hand reared free-living food, on land cared for and maintained by rural community for the rural community. Do not judge what you don't understand. If you want something to moan about, try chicken-nuggets.
mkw478 4 years ago
Organic???? They aren't reared on organic food, and they are now being reared in battery cages. Looks like its you who doesn't know what they are talking about.
The video isn't to highlight pheasant shooting its to highlight the despicable behaviour of the chairman of the national gamekeepers association.
What have these people got to hide?
Exposingthem 4 years ago
Traindriver666 .....actually admits that he is a tweed wearing cretin! Case closed !
Sounds to me that he was the guy who would walk around stealing people's sweets in the playground too...until someone stood up to him and broke his nose and sent him running to the teacher. Men with guns ...quite possibly the weakest link in the human gene pool.
rrbh 4 years ago
"Men with guns ...quite possibly the weakest link in the human gene pool".
Wow! What a clever reply! Seeing as it was a weak nerd who was filming them!
There is nothin wrong with hunting!
Weve been doing it for thousands of years. I'm sure you could find something better to do than attack sprots you know NOTHING about.
booplexie 4 years ago
Great job! That's exactly the kind of reaction I'd expect from someone who kills for fun. Unfortunately most people are also totally disinformed about the huge number of human victims caused by this brutal, dangerous, unfair and useless "sport". Sadly unters can't be banned because they're supported by weapon industry lobby which uses the "sportsgun" sale as an alibi to justify their existence and hide its real trade, war.
alexmoky 4 years ago
Not well handled, but LACS are a not the most tactful people either. The shooting industry is not a cruel one - plus it employs thousands of people and ploughs millions into rural economies that really need it.
bonio73 4 years ago
Gamekeepers have the highest suicide rate next to vets because of the pressure to deliver - but shooting puts more money to conservation than anything else. There is real fear in the countryside that we and out children will be attacked or killed by animal rights extremists. One man with a camera could quietly get enough pictures to wipe out your whole family.
Trebedderyet 4 years ago
Great to see this. These people are real scum!! They really show themselves for what they are when they gang up on ONE MAN.
Suzievegan 4 years ago
What a bunch of pricks
bruncle 4 years ago
Unfortunately the British countryside is riddled with these spineless, arrogant, tweed wearing cretins.They feel safe in numbers - but when alone they have no balls- I've seen it time and time again. The real dregs of humanity . KEEP FILMING . Excellent work.
rrbh 4 years ago
Haha, thanks for showing these scum for what they really are.
fire2burn 4 years ago
Just goes to show what scum these people are.
I just wander what they have to hide?
Exposingthem 4 years ago
They're scum.
Thanks for highlighting this.
Wish we could get the normal media to show more of this stuff.
MartynJohnston 4 years ago