Added: 2 years ago
From: village1diot
Views: 39,483
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (508)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You must bow down to the god of indigestion!

  • men are just as oppressed in the middle east as women, they have to dress and act a certain way.. the difference is that men have to go fight and die while women just stay home... both genders are oppressed! only men get killed..

  • @snoweyeball You are correct... if you don't count that in many places, women can't drive, must be covered from head to toe, and can be stoned to death for being raped... Not to mention female 'circumcision'. Otherwise, you are right. Men are just as oppressed.

  • Faith: firm belief in something for which there is no proof (2): complete trust in something that is believed especially with strong conviction;

  • This is a reply to a comment i made about faith being based on evidence. Biblical faith is based on evidence. Atheists can claim otherwise if they want. Evidence of things not seen. Like the wind or radio waves which are just as real as visible material like rocks. From belief in the historical record, or more importantly, personal and corporate experiences. Atheists simply choose not to believe what people say about what is happening to them.

  • He doesn't have a problem with islam, because in the West it is irrelivant?

    Has Matt been in a coma or something?

    As far as I'm concerned, islam is the biggest problem, globally.

  • @SicSeb how it islam the biggest problem globally? The islamic organisations in the west aren't very influential. Neither are the anywhere in china or south america for that matter. The only place islam really has any influence is in the islamic countries.

  • @SicSeb yeah, i don't think islam has much to do with rising numbers of refugees, famine or the economic crisis. All more important than an imagined issue with islam.

  • She knows that she knows that she knows - come on how can't anybody see that this is the truth? She KNOWS!

    I mean, seriously, I only know ONE thing.

    I know that I know nothing.

  • How do you know? I feel it! Go to a doctor. Maybe it's indigestion. ----- too funny, Matt.

  • Faith is based on evidence. Faith is not based on nothing. Faith is the substance of things hoped for based on the EVIDENCE of things not seen. Science uses "faith" by this definition from the bible all the time. Something is observed, or postulated, then experiements are created to test the hypothosis and a conclusion in eventually arrived at. People have "faith" in Jesus because of the evidence in their own lives as well as scripture. People know Jesus Experiencially which builds up faith.

  • @hellbindercda Science doesn't try to prove, it tries to disprove. If you come up with a hypothosis you're meant to disprove it, not prove it.

  • @hellbindercda Faith is based on evidence? You clearly are a long way off understanding the definition of faith then.

  • @hellbindercda If faith was really based on evidence as you claim, don't you think there would be only *one* faith in the world, instead of thousands?

  • @hellbindercda No, faith is NOT based off evidence. Faith is a belief in something despite lack of evidence, or evidence to the contrary.

  • @Fortune2point0 I would say Atheism is based on denial of evidence to the contrary. Atheists deny what they may experience but not see, Spiritual people believe in what they can see and what they experience that can not be seen but the affect/effect of it is still measurable and demonstrable..

  • @hellbindercda If there is measurable and demonstrable evidence of a spirits, a god, or anything of that nature, then present it. All of the evidence that I've gathered points to a lack of a "spiritual realm", or at least lack of one that can have any effect on the natural world.

  • I LOVE TRACIE!!!!!!!!

  • There is no truly meaningless information. It is the context in which the information is given/used that determines it's level of meaning or relevance.

    Even "The duck went to the other child until one goes with a black bonnet looks creepy" can be meaningful and relevant if it's, say, the password to your computer.

    As a purely hypothetical example, of course.

  • @SeedsOfHatred Thank you captain obvious.

  • @dkthg You're very welcome; Princess Cliche.

    Do understand, though, that not everyone is as incredibly discerning and intellectually-sound as yourself. Thus, they might find such a comment as mine interesting or thought-provoking.

    Besides, I don't really need to justify the philosophical statements that I made last night while I was drunk, do I?

    I think that you of all people should see that the answer to that question is, of course, obvious.

    :)

  • @SeedsOfHatred We all make mistakes. THAT'S WHY PENCILS HAVE ERASERS! When it comes to drinking and drugs JUST SAY NO! Now if you'll excuse me i have to coach a youth hockey team called the The Mighty Ducks i didn't wanna do it but these young kids have warmed my heart and now, thanks to a training MONTAGE, we're gonna win the championship! Wish us luck! Princess Cliche signing off.

  • @dkthg I realize you're a troll, but at least you're a troll who's fun to listen to.

  • @SeedsOfHatred A troll? Naaaaaah, i'm just a girl having a bit a fun. Btw: you've got GREAT abs!

  • @dkthg Yes I know, thank you ;)

  • It's almost like she didn't even understand the questions Matt was asking.

  • Whenever someone says 'I know that I know that I know' (and says the word know three or four times.) I always want to say 'What the fuck does that even mean?' It's GIBBERISH!

    I know that I know makes some sense. You know you have a piece of knowledge. But when you add an extra I know or ten, how does that really change anything? Knowing you know you have a piece of knowledge is identical to knowing you have a piece of knowledge. Because if you know you have that knowledge, OF COURSE you know.

  • @TheSkunkCat

    I mean, not that I think theists KNOW, I think they don't even know what the word 'know' means. Because they can't seem to tell 'gut feeling' from 'cold hard fact'.

    I think mentally these people are sort of stuck in childhood. Like a small child might not believe someone has a pet peacock, because they think 'no one has a pet peacock' and to these children that settles it, because they can't quite think on an adult level yet.

    Some of these theists though, they NEVER learned.

  • @TheSkunkCat

    :) So...you believe everyone owns a invisible peacock...???

    Dude, you so craaaaaaaazy

  • @TheSkunkCat Completely agree SkunkCat. I know a few people who are in their twenties but seem to have the logic and understanding of a ten year old. They aren't capable of understanding certain ideas or taking different information other than their own into consideration. Its kind of funny, but also interesting to see how people think so differently.

  • @bigblockvista I'm 27 and I was always that age in my head after 16 years old o.o I guess I'm the exception to the rule or something, because I tend to be quite mature. In contrast, I've councilled a 37 year old who won't admit he's gay. He wants me to say "oh, this is a common mental illness, the dellusion of liking men.."

    It's a child's reaction "LALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!". Maturity comes with personality, not age :p

  • @LichQueenKathie Absolutely right. From what I've seen. age has nothing to do with maturity like you said. Only the type of person you are and your upbringing. Personally, I think upbringing, the way you were raised plays a big part in how you act as a later teen/adult. If your parents are shitty people it will most likely rub off onto you.

  • @bigblockvista Developmental psychologists would agree with you xD

  • I put that bitch on hold

    Bitches love bein put on hold.

  • @DasHinchen especially if you have dat elevator music or waiting room jazz on your line

  • @DasHinchen hahahahaha

  • oh, the truth is out there!!! dont ignore it, do the research

  • So so loved this rant. Nice, Matt. Spot on.

  • @fs93543 He's an atheist. An atheist is someone who doesn't believe that there is a god. If he had something against a god, whichever you like to pick as "the true one", he would believe that he exist, hence he wouldn't be an atheist.

    The more you know.

  • @fs93543 you have something against reality, and try your best to lead people away from reality because you think reality failed you, but you walked away from reality.

  • Jesus us lord who ever follows him will not walk in darkness but in righteous light

  • @fs93543 How do you know?

  • 6:26 hahahahahaha!

  • You know, they say that "infinite" as a concept can't be proven in the physical world, but I disagree because these atheist experience videos go on forever, seriously how many clips are there! It boggles my mind that the internet has the capacity to hold them all!

  • @dragonforce525 well that was stupid.

  • @SSjLuigi1 Relax friend it was just a joke.

  • Why did Tracie cut off her hair?

    In this video it looks awesome!

  • @tommiedepew1 I tell ya, those low-flying Hitlers.... gotta watch out for them

  • @tommiedepew1 "Trying." Maybe Hitler should teach you to spell. Funny though, but that's not socialism

  • "I'll gladly give my life for God"

    "Excellent, not just put on this explosive vest"

  • Can we just, like as a society, stop comparing things to Hitler? Nobody was as evil as Hitler and I find comparing things to him a little annoying and over played

  • @petegriswold I actually think religion has killed MANY more people in history than Hitler.

  • These guys are heroes!

  • People have ben wrong about a lot of things for as long as there have ben people.

    That should be made as a bumpersticker.

  • @Sweddude cookie for you sir

  • @WhyNotHateThemAll mmmmm, cookie.

  • These TAE women dont wear makeup. I like that. Jen doesnt either. Offensive misogynistic face paint be gone. You guys need to make a calendar with all the cast mocking religion. Ill buy one.

  • @699backstab I think it's just that the video filters are horrible on YouTube.

    And what's wrong with make-up?

  • I love Matt's question. It's a modified version of the question Hitchens poses over and over, but nobody has provided answer for.

  • some people are more special than others.

  • Are christians so brain dead that they don't realize when they are contradicting themselves?

  • 7:50 lmfao all hail matt d

  • Are we ever going to hear a good argument from a Christian, probably not, yet so many people subscribe to it. Is this the best evolution has to offer.

  • AS Mark Twain said : "Faith is believing what you know ain't so".

  • @truesouljs actually it was Friedrich Nietzsche who said that. Twain quoted Nietzsche

  • @PrinzVidar Thanks for correcting me.

  • @PrinzVidar and nietzsche was a moron.

  • @hellbindercda says the guy who says "faith is based on evidence"

  • @PrinzVidar :D Right on!

  • I can't remember Tracie ever putting anyone on hold the way Matt does. Tracie is doing the Socratic aproach, leading the callers to reach the conclusions themselves. Matt is using the 'listen while I explain for half an hour' approach. I understand that the callers can be irritating, that they present arguments that have been presented so many times and really need an uninterrupted, clear erbuttal, and i understand they have limited time. But I still like Tracie best.

  • @topperheartramada Yeah but I mean think about it, if Tracy did what she does for her, do you really think it would have changed the caller's opinion?

  • @topperheartramada Matt is pretty much a little bitch most of the time. But it WAS funny as hell to watch him rip apart the 911 kooks.

  • @EdgemanLL2 ,

    I think he's spreading good ideas around.. And good, critical attitude. Perhaps he's also compensating for the severe lack thereof in his callers.

  • @extropian314 Oh yes. He's a bitch. But a very sharp mind.

  • Good video, but holy shit the audio is bad. It's giving me a headache.

  • it's not just - good or bad reasons. that's too black and white to be real.

  • rev 20:4 is the guillotine scripture and 2:10 is ten days of torture 16: is the torches ...read revelations and the bible its the sons of god verses the children of Israel... the bible is a book about slavery for the main god (seth) of the bible that enslaves the children of pleroma

  • My father is probably the most open minded Christian once we were talking and argumenting about religion he said that beliving for just beliving is just stupid. Haha love him the most honest christian.

  • "maybe it's indigestion" lol

  • @powecell Bingo, you got it. They can't. Just as we can't prove he doesn't exist.

  • @TheHonestRoger

    And I'll go ahead and answer your other question, too: "What do you do w/'mere speculation?'" Simple! JUST APPLY THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD TO IT! lol! No, really, man!

    Go back and _carefully_ re-read the EXACT, NON-PARAPHRASED steps of the Scientific Method WORD-FOR-WORD. All of this and ur questions should then become totally clear to you. ^_^

  • @macgeek2004 Apply the scientific method to something with absolutely no evidence?? LOL You idiot

  • @TheHonestRoger

    "So, w/o any evidence, if it's logically impossible to rule them out, then any and all speculation or any idea presented becomes possibly true. So how should we treat mere speculation?"

    YES, YES, THAT'S *ABSOLUTELY* TRUE!!! Congrats, you FINALLY understood the concept! Lol.

  • @EdgemanLL2

    Dude, you have the patience of a SAINT, seriously!!! I just can't deal w/dumb people like that! If I were you, I'd've already invented a device to punch them over the Internet! Lol!

    Next time, tho, just give a simple, one-sentence answer w/e he asks you what "you should do with mere speculation?" You should reply, "Use the Scientific Method!"

  • Tracie Harris has a different hair style in here. Oh How I love her. Beauty AND brains. She does not speak often but when she does it becomes evident that she has a greater intellect compared with, say, Matt Dillahunty..

  • Theists universal reasoning against ALL arguments:

    Step 1) The bible is true because it says it's true.

    Step 2) God is real, I know that I know that because I know.

    Step 3) I've had a personal experience.

    Step 4) Believe or burn in hell FOREVER!

    Step 5) Repeat steps 1 - 4....over & over & over & over & over ............

    Madness.

  • @IAMLordJesusChrist - Lol, I hope u are kidding cause that is very funny, If u are not, well then WOW!!!

  • @paulcorda I command thee to laugh! (and think)

  • Just another preacher. Blah blah blah.

  • @powecell I don't care enough to go out of my way and prove that. As far as Im concerned you can think I'm gay, i don't care

  • Dude slipped a little at the beginning. No REAL scientist would say people are wrong on that question. Only that there is no evidence to support the belief.

    Athiesm itself (or agnostics) is also faith-based belief. Because there is no evidence either way, neither side can claim as a fact that God does/doesnt exist. All we can say, as a matter of scientific fact, logic, et cetera, is that there is zero evidence to support the existance of God.

  • @EdgemanLL2 Non-belief in something is not faith-based.

  • @00D00 Sure it is. When there is zero evidence to support the non-belief. But Further, the question was about those who say with certainty "there is no God.' There is just as much evidence to support that God does exist as to say that he doesnt.

    Its correct to say there is zero evidence of the existance of God. But its pure faith to claim he does, or doesnt exist. There is zero evidence to support either side.

  • @EdgemanLL2 "There is just as much evidence to support that God does exist, as there is to say he doenst."

    Meaning, there is zero evidence for either claim.

  • @EdgemanLL2 The burden of proof is on the believer, that's like saying not playing football's a sport. Also there's a LOT more evidence against a creator than there is for.

  • @00D00 Right. and for those who BELIEVE God doesnt exist, the burden is theres to support that. Just as those who claim God does exist have the burden to support their claim.

    Best we can say is the evidence isnt dispositive either way.

  • @EdgemanLL2 You don't have prove anything for not believing. Person A says they can fly me perosn says I don't believe them It's not up to me to disprove it. If they don't have reasonable evidence for their claims then you just don't have to believe them.

  • @nextgenvids "Not believing" isnt the issue. The issue is making declarative statements of fact.

    If someone says "God doesnt exist" that is an affirmative declaration. It is NOT demanding the disprove someone else. Its the burden of them to prove their own claims.

  • @EdgemanLL2 " those who BELIEVE God doesnt exist, the burden is theres to support that " from you. It is logically impossible to prove non-existence, so non-believers cannot be logically required to prove god doesn't exist. If I say there is a purple tad pole in a pond and person b says there isn't I can show him and prove it if it's true.

  • @nextgenvids Correct. Just as the bruden is on the people who say he doesnt exist to prove their claims. While there may never be a difinitive way to prove a non-existance, that doesnt change the irrefutable fact that absence of proof is not proof of absence.

    To say "Ive never seen proof of it, so thats proof it doesnt exist" is a logical fallacy. Appeal to ignorance.

  • @EdgemanLL2 Yes, but I haven't said anything about not seeing proof and claiming it's not true. If there is evidence then someone can assert it's true if there is absence of evidence from a claim then someone can say it's not true until proven. Proving the non-existence of something is again a illogical statement.

  • @nextgenvids Youre overlooking the original point. I am specifically speaking about Dude, at the very beginning, saying that people who believe in God are "wrong."

    Thats a statement that HE made, that isnt supported factally. Its not been proved either way. His belief has only faith to sustain it.

  • @EdgemanLL2 I honestly don't care what people believe more of what they claim. If they claim it we can say it's not true as much as we want, and it's up to them to prove their claims because claims require evidence. Belief doesn't mean it's true only evidence determines that.

  • @nextgenvids blah blah blah blah. Point remains. To state as a FACT (as dude did) its wrong to believe god exists is ONLY a valid statement, if there is PROOF to support it. There isnt.

  • @EdgemanLL2 You're ignoring what I'm telling you. If some makes a claim you can say it's false until it's proven by them. Matt ask for demonstrable proof, and there is non. She is making a claim. It's fallacious to say prove the non-existence of something. If I say santa doesn't exist it would'nt be my job to prove the non-existence of him if some claims it to be true. Get your index fingers out your ears.

  • @nextgenvids Stop projecting. Ive already agreed with what youve said, many times.

    But you really dont have a clue, not the smallest clue of what I was saying, do you?

    Tell me, what was the point that Ive been making. In your own words. I bet you cant.

  • @EdgemanLL2 I'm telling you what you said is false. You said he made a claim of evidence that god didn't exist and nowhere in there did he say that. The woman made a claim and he said she didn't have proof.

  • @nextgenvids Translation: "Youre right Edge. I IGNORED what you said, and just repeated "its false." because I have no real idea what you were saying."

    Try again. Re-read my comments. Repeat back to me the point I was making.

    Unless youre too skeeered to. Then you can ignore it.

  • @EdgemanLL2 Misqouting and trying to use intimidation are red herring fallacies. I told you what you said, but if you choose to ignore it there is nothing I can do about it. Quit it with the child's play.

  • @nextgenvids So you STILL cant tell me what my point was?

    Interesting, no?

  • @EdgemanLL2 Yes I did, and it's flawed so I corrected it. I won't let something that's false stand. " I am specifically speaking about Dude, at the very beginning, saying that people who believe in God are "wrong." "

    He said there is no demonstrable proof of her claims what you say is irrelevant.

  • @nextgenvids False. because I never said that he "claims to have evidence."

    Now, Ill be glad to educate you again. But you gotta promise to pay attention this time, OK?

  • @EdgemanLL2 You said " To state as a FACT (as dude did) its wrong to believe god exists is ONLY a valid statement, if there is PROOF to support it. There isnt. "

    You said he claimed it as fact which a fact requires evidence which is a claim.

  • @nextgenvids STILL not paying attention. That wasnt what I asked you.

    I asked you if you PROMISE to pay attention this time. Possible answers?

    a) Yes

    b) No.

    Whats your answer?

  • @EdgemanLL2 I corrected what you denied, and I'm ignoring your red herring.

  • @nextgenvids

    I guess youre still NOT willing to pay attention, since you cant pay attention long enough to answer a simple question. LMGDAOOOO

  • @EdgemanLL2 Red herring.

  • @nextgenvids Projection.

  • @EdgemanLL2 Another red herring. Stop getting off topic.

  • @nextgenvids Im ON topic, Youre not answering the question. Until the get back on topic and start answering, the topic is frozen.

    tick tick....tick tock....

    Projection.

  • @EdgemanLL2 You're changing the subject by asking something irrevelant for what you were talking about before. Calling false fallacies is a fallacy.

  • @nextgenvids Im not going to have the same retarded conversation over and over.

    answer the question, or I will simply wait until you do.

  • @EdgemanLL2 I'm not falling for a red herring if it were on topic I would have but it is not. It's not my choosing just logic.

  • @nextgenvids Still no answer? Ill wait.

  • @EdgemanLL2 Yeah there won't be because I'm not answering a red herring.

  • @nextgenvids You work on an answer. Ill check back with you later. =]

  • @EdgemanLL2 Your "point" seems to be- If there is no evidence at all, and someone makes a claim (which they cannot do) that something exists then someone else cannot claim that it doesn't exist.

    Of course, without any evidence talk of gods or invisible pixies is only speculation Perhaps I will interpret your comments as-anything is possible until proven impossible

  • @TheHonestRoger False. What I am saying is that while it is correct to say (paraphrased) "there hasnt been any evidence produced that proves a god exists," it is equally baseless to say (as a statement of fact) that god doesnt exist as it is to say god does exist.

    There is no proof in either direction.

  • @EdgemanLL2 What did I say that was false? So,without any evidence, if it's logically impossible to rule them out then any and all speculation or any idea suggested becomes possibly true. Invisible pixies,gods,heaven,hell,flying spaghetti monsters,vampires,invisible friends.the list goes on,limited only by our imaginations.So how should we treat mere speculation?

  • @TheHonestRoger Yuour falsity was your spin on what my point was.

    As it is logically impossible to (as we agree) "rule him out," then its logically retarded for someone to insist its wrong to say a god exists.

    All one can say is that there is no evidence of one. Stating that a god does, or does not exist, it equal speculation ,

  • @EdgemanLL2 All I am saying is that this works exactly the same for invisible pixiesor vampires secretly living among us or talking frogs or anything we can imagine. So how should we treat mere speculation?

  • @TheHonestRoger So, thus proving my original point. Dude was WRONG to insist it is a wrong belief. its a belief about which there is no evidence.

  • @EdgemanLL2 He never mentioned god at all !! If you want to make a point then just make it. Don't put words into people's mouths

  • @TheHonestRoger Jesus tittifucking CHRIST, woman!

    Its very simple. At the very beginning, in response to the caller stating a religeous belief in god, Dude says (paraphrased) "people have been WRONG about things for as long as there have been people."

    That only means ONE thing.

    ::shakes head::: fuxing home schoolers. I swear....

  • @EdgemanLL2 Hey sweetpants, there is a big difference between religion and god and I can explain it to you if you like. I hoped you might have had an original idea of your own about how we should handle such speculations, in fact I asked for your thoughts twice. Instead you just parrot your pointless point. You say nothing.

  • @TheHonestRoger You dont seem capable to explain velcro, much less anything more complex.

    Youve already agreed with me. lol

  • @EdgemanLL2 Matt implied that her religion was wrong, and I agree him, as their is evidence against it. He never stated for a fact that there is no god as you claim. Every believer has their own view or description of a god or gods. Everyone's imagination is different,millions of different claims,whatever they want it to be. Many claims of a god I have heard are logically impossible and some are entirely possible.How should we treat such speculations?

  • @TheHonestRoger "Matt implied that her religion was wrong,"

    Correct. Which he can NOT (as a scientist) claim, without proof that God doesnt exist.

    For the 87th time, I repeat myself. The BEST science can say is tha tthere is no proof of God. It cant say its actually a wrong belief.

  • @EdgemanLL2 Not all religions can be true, many are mutually exclusive. In fact every religion on Earth could be wrong and yet some type of god still could exist totally unknown to us. Matt does not talk of gods but of her religion being wrong, which as a scientist he can do as there is evidence against it.

  • @TheHonestRoger That wasnt the question. Nor does it do anything to invalidate my irrefutable point.

  • @EdgemanLL2 At the start of this video (which is obviously not the start of the conversation and we don't know what was said immediately prior), the caller humbly realises religion didn't start in 2008 and Matt says peolpe have been wrong about a lot of things for a long time. You have managed to turn this into "To state as a FACT its wrong to believe god exists" WOW !!

  • @EdgemanLL2 God is the snake that crawls up the staff (The god in the bible or Koran is not your god... but he demands to be worshipped by you ... his name is Seth...you want proof look up the all seeing eye of Horus... make your dollar bills into air planes and watch the World Trade Center fall (same bills since 1950) 7 is his number 7 seas 7 continents 7 sins.. Seth is everywhere... listen to Hells Bells by AC/DC and hear his plan and other music forward and backwards.. (Egyptain Mythology)

  • @EdgemanLL2 The pyramids are his creation, the 7 spikes on the statue of Liberty did you know that the statue of liberty represents a half naked beaten prostitute that was force to stand on a stool and hold up a torch... She was beat and probably killed by freemasons who sent the statue to America. The illuminati follow gods plan, bilderbergs, nwo, bohemian club, Skull and bones.... every world leader is associated with one or all of these groups... what more evidence ..I have 40k words worth

  • @SethJesusSatan you know youre a grown man, right? Shave? Pay Taxes? have public hair?

    Put away childish things.

  • @EdgemanLL2 Wow you have the wit of a child..I don't think you have the capacity to understand but you have to try or you can ignore my warning but when you learn Im right you will know you could have helped your family, friends and yourself..Obama is fulfilling biblical scripture Revelation 2:10 guillotines are being set up in Fema camps Revelation 16:8, 16:9 large furnaces are connected to the camps... they're going to burn people with torches the worst torcher imaginable you will surrender!

  • @EdgemanLL2 LOOK IT UP NOW! ITS REALLY HAPPENING! YOUTUBE IT NOW...OPEN YOUR EYES ...FAST ...REAL FAST!

  • @SethJesusSatan Well, if its on YT its GOTTA be true. ::eyeroll:::

    And they wonder why no one takes them seriously? LOL

  • @EdgemanLL2 Its real buddy, and when you know it's real, you will know you could have saved your friends family and yourself...goodbye

  • @SethJesusSatan And 50 year from now, youll have wasted your life living in a unabomber shack. And Ill be laughng at you wasting your life, cowering in fear of non-existent threats.

    But, you WILL have the pride in having given all your money to Alex Jones. lolol

  • @EdgemanLL2 Allow me to explain my learning process: I was an atheist.. I researched lee oswald (jfk killer) I was blown away to learn a secret society controlled both the usa and ussr during the cold war (lee a nobody committed treason and nothing was done?)

  • @SethJesusSatan Your learning process is that youre a gullible moron who believes every internet rumor. 

  • @EdgemanLL2 I then learned about secret societies and their bizarre rituals.. I found them to be the occult also I learned their symbolism and found it everywhere in our world.. I studied the bible and ancient religions and learned what they are doing and why... I'm not wrong the evidence is everywhere

  • @EdgemanLL2 Just so you know I do not fear... but you should ...just like it says in reverse on so many songs (Stairway to Heaven being one of them) There is no escaping ... Jesus is our only savior... read Revelations ... The bible is percise and accurate...it just leaves a lot of details out .. Its a neutral book but it is not to tip us off..I wish I was wrong but i'm not... however the ones who find the way will avoid slavery and receive the greatest eternal reward!

  • @SethJesusSatan of COURSE you fear. your whole LIFE is fear. Youre controlled by it.

    Idiots sell you bullshit kookspiracies to scare you shitless, and you shit yourself readily.

  • @EdgemanLL2 Cancer, terrorist, global pollution, bad economy, crime in the neighborhood, skin color, credit cards, multiple religions, everything on the six o clock news, and everything on television is meant to scare you and control you… I’m not in hiding however I don’t underestimate… Anyway you look at it life on earth isn’t forever so I got my boots on and my eyes open! Wake up kid (or adult with a child’s capacity)

  • @EdgemanLL2 Hey patriot did you ever see the bomb strapped on the bottom of the second airplane that flew into the World Trade Center? or did you know the terrorist were trained on US soil in our air force bases? (according to former soldiers) Do you know what the Statue of Liberty represent? A beaten half naked prostitute that was forced to stand on a stool and hold up a torch. source: Bill Schnoebelen a former illuminati member ... You bought the bullshit and you're still buying.... Idiot!

  • @EdgemanLL2 Hey patriot did you ever see the bomb strapped on the bottom of the second airplane that flew into the World Trade Center? or did you know the terrorist were trained on US soil in our air force bases? (according to former soldiers) Do you know what the Statue of Liberty represent? A beaten half naked prostitute that was forced to stand on a stool and hold up a torch. source: Bill Schnoebelen a former illuminati member ... You bought the bullshit and you're still buying.... Idiot!

  • @SethJesusSatan

    1) There was no bomb

    2) if you believe the terrorists did train here, then you admit THEY ARE TERRORISTS WHO ATTACKED US ON 911.

    GOOD JOB RETARD! YOU DEBUNKED YOURSELF! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!

  • @EdgemanLL2 Am I debating with a 4 year old? You have the logic of one! Go flip some burgers and buy some good burn cream... you'll need it!

  • @SethJesusSatan Awe. Poor baby cried. "Edge hurt my vagina! He proved that I realy DO KNOW 911 was an outside job!" Boo hoo. LMGDAOOOO

    Edge wins.