this is all rubish, I've been on IFA "German equivalent of CES" some years ago and I've seen a TV like this there, I didn't need glasses at all and I even could walk from side to side and see that take effect. how can it be that these TV's are still not on sale? the technology exists for years already
@newbornalien Yes, but instead of using glasses to separate out the picture for each eye it uses a paralax screen which angles each image slightly differently to give the effect of depth. The downside being there is a very small sweet spot for the 3D effect and the resolution is much lower.
Also , THERE ARE 3 SPOTS ; it varies from company to company , but generally , it goes from 38° to 50° (some companies said even more with different technologies); also,consider that,on a flat surface,the viewing angle is 180° and that you can find more spots ,like so :lateral left 38+ center 38+ lateral right 38...got it ?
Also,a few feet far,the spot is small,but take some more steps away and the angle projection gets wider...allowing more people.
@zimtower that's gibberish... lenses are needed to angel the ray's differently, and I would prefer a cheap plastic sheet of tiny lenses compared to what you were speaking of. xD
@danman5856 First of all, they cant put a shutter in contact lenses. Second of all, if youre going to use polarity based 3d, contacts have to be perfectly aligned, which might be very difficult to maintain
By using this type of technology, not necessarily this model can source images be duplicated on the different viewing angles of the screen ?
In other words can a 2 frame stereoscopic 3D source be duplicated to fill 6 angles of the screen so that me and two other people can watch in 3D ? Obviously sat at just the right spacing and with eyes horizontal to the screen
@morgs2020 That wasn't shown on this TV and we haven't seen it in the flesh but there have been news stories in the last year about TVs hat could do exactly that.
That will never sell. You have to get close to the tv to see it, no thanks. I do not want to sit so close to it. I would rather wear the glasses. Honestly I like wearing the glasses. If my mom and dad watch they will not be able to see it because the tv and the couch is far away from each other. The glasses tv will sell but not the one without, unless they fix it.
@gamegod19 The camera didn't do a good job of capturing the image. In person it was a lot better, however it was still quite basic. What it did show was that there is potential for glasses-free 3D to work. It will be a long way off yet though.
But will it blend!?
zack36ooo 6 months ago
this is all rubish, I've been on IFA "German equivalent of CES" some years ago and I've seen a TV like this there, I didn't need glasses at all and I even could walk from side to side and see that take effect. how can it be that these TV's are still not on sale? the technology exists for years already
arand4 1 year ago
@arand4 maybe because it doesn't has an economical price yet?
ptuku 11 months ago
Nothing's indeed impossible with technology. Only time, patience, resources and knowledge limits it.
kkjgg112391 1 year ago
REAL LIFE: NEWEST TECHNOLOGY OF 3D!! NOW BEHIND EVERY FRONT DOOR, DONT MISS IT!
rafl.
Mastertim2006 1 year ago 6
does it work with very fast frames showing us 2 different images almost at the same time or not????
newbornalien 1 year ago
@newbornalien Yes, but instead of using glasses to separate out the picture for each eye it uses a paralax screen which angles each image slightly differently to give the effect of depth. The downside being there is a very small sweet spot for the 3D effect and the resolution is much lower.
WhichWebsite 1 year ago
WRONG!Resolution depends on company choices...
Also , THERE ARE 3 SPOTS ; it varies from company to company , but generally , it goes from 38° to 50° (some companies said even more with different technologies); also,consider that,on a flat surface,the viewing angle is 180° and that you can find more spots ,like so :lateral left 38+ center 38+ lateral right 38...got it ?
Also,a few feet far,the spot is small,but take some more steps away and the angle projection gets wider...allowing more people.
liadon666 1 year ago
One day we will have TVs that have LEDs that can change angles for 3D effect without having to use a lens over the screen.
zimtower 1 year ago
@zimtower that's gibberish... lenses are needed to angel the ray's differently, and I would prefer a cheap plastic sheet of tiny lenses compared to what you were speaking of. xD
ptuku 11 months ago
now ur gonna have things IN YOUR FACE coming from the idiot box..wow...
trufiend138 1 year ago
i cant see the hole bideo is stay cold at 0:25
coliacristo 1 year ago
0:26
coliacristo 1 year ago
Old technology.
high6808 1 year ago
3d sorry. iPhone spell check
danman5856 1 year ago
Idea: for normal 3G tvs. They should make contacts instead of glasses lol
danman5856 1 year ago
@danman5856 First of all, they cant put a shutter in contact lenses. Second of all, if youre going to use polarity based 3d, contacts have to be perfectly aligned, which might be very difficult to maintain
pokerface3699 1 year ago
We created with 3D eyes I think there is no need for these kind of technology.
TheShuieb 1 year ago
Fantastic!
amzproduct 1 year ago
0:12
undef75 1 year ago
By using this type of technology, not necessarily this model can source images be duplicated on the different viewing angles of the screen ?
In other words can a 2 frame stereoscopic 3D source be duplicated to fill 6 angles of the screen so that me and two other people can watch in 3D ? Obviously sat at just the right spacing and with eyes horizontal to the screen
morgs2020 1 year ago
@morgs2020 That wasn't shown on this TV and we haven't seen it in the flesh but there have been news stories in the last year about TVs hat could do exactly that.
WhichWebsite 1 year ago
@WhichWebsite Cheers!
morgs2020 1 year ago
That will never sell. You have to get close to the tv to see it, no thanks. I do not want to sit so close to it. I would rather wear the glasses. Honestly I like wearing the glasses. If my mom and dad watch they will not be able to see it because the tv and the couch is far away from each other. The glasses tv will sell but not the one without, unless they fix it.
MrDragontamer2009 1 year ago
I take it you have to see it in person because the video cant capture it and if it could and or is then im not impressed.
gamegod19 1 year ago
@gamegod19 The camera didn't do a good job of capturing the image. In person it was a lot better, however it was still quite basic. What it did show was that there is potential for glasses-free 3D to work. It will be a long way off yet though.
WhichWebsite 1 year ago 4
@WhichWebsite Nintendo is coming out with the 3DS which will project #D without glasses. Suppose to be out WAY before the 3D TV's arrive...
kenny6446 1 year ago
TCL THOMSON RCA
To ta sama firma!
RCA pokazał pierwszy stereoskopowy ekran rok temu i jest pierwszym ekranem na świecie na lotnisku w południowych Chinach!
W Chinach jest pod nazwą : TD-42F
Sprzedają nowe modely w maju 2010!
POWROTTATY 2 years ago
very interesting!
regisfun 2 years ago