Cheapest and best water filter - in the LONG TERM

[JohnLennon100]

Exactly ....whole house filtration is better because ...IT MAKES YOU MAKE MORE MONEY .....Do you thjink people are stupid? How come a filter system for a WHOLE house would require less mainteinance than drinking water system? It's just ridiculous ....

[PinchMeBand]

@JohnLennon100 - Average maintenance cost (after initial expense) for a quality whole house filter is $100 per year - Reverse Osmosis is $180.00 per year for just water from one auxiliary faucet, and possibly your ice maker. You do the math.

[JohnLennon100]

@PinchMeBand You're being deceiving like most business people have become in this country. A country of scamers. That (after initial expense) will save your throat when you do the right cost analysis and put also mainteinance and replacement cost. Stop scaming people, and be honest for once in your life!

[PinchMeBand]

@JohnLennon100 At least you like the Beatles.

[waterfiltersystems1]

why this video it so simple?

[miguelbgood]

Removes all chemicals? I think not. Reduces, yes; removes, no.

And is this system NSF certified? If not, what independent testing lab says this filter system does what it says it does, or does anything for that matter?

Anyone can say anything about a water filtration system, but unless it's NSF certified (NSF is an independent lab/ analysis / watchdog organization) you really don't know that it does what it says it does.

[PinchMeBand]

@miguelbgood Hi-

No claims of removing all chemicals here, Miguel! The filtration components we use in fabrication are NSF certified, but we build systems for specific water quality issues and certifying over 50 system configurations is cost prohibitive. If you dig hard - The WQA Gold Seal Certifications pass systems that are removing 50% of the stated chemical over the gallon life - This can be a disservice to the consumer at a high cost to the manufacturer. We appreciate your comments!