Added: 4 years ago
From: catalystmovement
Views: 6,648
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • knowing that cigarettes might cause cancer in myself has never deterred me, but knowing that my cigarettes are tested on animals and that i am contributing to the harm of innocent animals, has, for the first time in my life, made me decide to quit.

  • we should talk about the mouse house!!!

  • Smoking is a great habit. BUt cigarettes are DISGUSTING, which is why smokers should go roll your owns, or use organic tobacco products, or grow their own.

  • ok can't we just test it on humans you fucking idiots?!

  • care2. com /c2c/share /detail/294781 (add w's adn remove spaces)

  • This vid does not show the real 'testing', forcing dogs, monkeys, chickens etc to smoke and later killing them. This actually kept warnings OFF cigarette packs as the animals did not get lung cancer. Thats the real purpose of animal 'tests', to conceal the truth.

    curedisease. net

  • where did you get this burgarner footage

  • 1981 Congressional Testimony by Dr. Irwin Bross, former Director of the Sloan-Kettering, the largest cancer research institute in the world, "The uselessness of most of the animal model studies is less well known...Indeed, while conflicting animal results have often delayed and hampered advances in the war on cancer, they have never produced a single substantial advance either in the prevention or treatment of human cancer."

    Disease makes money! Animal tests never cure...they = money

  • the big tobacco corporations are the greatest terrorists of any age. those who support them, by smoking their products & wearing their lousy t-shirts and baseball caps, are braindead tools.

    i smoked for a few years back in the '90s. i smoked because i was suicidal & was dying for an early grave. i remember thinking one day that if the surgeon general were to suddenly determine that cigarettes no longer caused cancer, then i would instantly quit.

    i think a lot of people feel this way.

  • i sell cigarettes for a living. i work in a liquor store, full-time, with nice benefits. (my co-worker Melanie is HOT, etc. and you know, all these animal testings are long done with: the animals are long dead and the experimentators have all committed suicide.

    the humans who are retarded enough to continue smoking big tobacco products are the new, much needed, guinea pigs for the system. the brain-dead dipshits whose sole purpose in life is expendability.

  • reminds me of a pinky and the brain episode.

  • this is horrible

  • I smoke 20 a day,so we need to get testing animals by making them smoke to help us find a cure incase i ever get lung cancer,im sure everyone would agree with that.

  • Fucking quit then, or do you want me to stick you in a room full of cigarettes smoke for days on end intill you get ill or die?

  • do i want you to put me in a room full of cigarettes and make me smoke for days?"Yes please,the price of fags today is a disgrace mate"

  • no...thats your choice if you choose to smoke..but an animal doesnt, they force them to.. they shouldnt suffer by being exposed to cigarettes..

  • What happened to all the beagle dogs they used to test the fags on,we should get them smoking again to see if we can find a cure for cancer,i remember they seemed to like smoking,well they looked happy enough to me.

  • seeing as how those beagle dogs were tested on back in the 60s and 70s, and seeing as how their life-span is generally 16 or so years, most idiots can tell they're long dead..

    the exception being you.

  • yes but we can get more beagles to test on,im worried cause i smoke 60 a day so we need to test on these dogs quickly as my life may depend on it,im sure no one would disagree with that.

  • 60 of which brand? i recommend American Spirits. big tobacco products (Marlboro, Camel, etc.) seem nothing more than a sad matter of population control. and no, we cannot get more beagles to test on. they have been declared the President's favourite pet and must forevermore remain unswervingly adored. besides, the testing results are already in: smokers are zombies.

  • BENSONS,and hedges 60 a day so please get testing on those dogs before i die of cancer,its only a few dogs,people would rather see me (a human )alive than a dog.

  • a very select group, i'm sure.

    i suggest you switch brands and cut back a bit. have you ever tried smoking opium? it's good stuff. you should be happy to be alive... please don't remain so reckless with your life!

  • I am happy to be alive,but I want to stay alive,thats why im in favor of animal testing,so the animals can come up with a cure incase I get cancer through me smoking too much,its people like you who try to stop the testing that put my life in danger. Ive not tried opium yet,I think ill leave the opium for you my friend.

  • i would appreciate being your friend, my darling fellow being. and i am purely well-acquainted with the majesties of opium; so, i shall attempt to fill you in, in time, with its mind-blowing splendor.

    the 3 of us, becoming 1.

    NO NEED FOR TORTURING HARMLESSLY ADORABLE BEAGLES!! if you please. if WE please. please, let US please.

    we're all friends here. in the end. let's work to put an end to the enemy: the divisibility of humanity. the divisibility of animality.

    let us kill the tormentors

  • w t fuck did all that mean please

  • like the character count here permits. i'd need the character count from an OED volume to state the least.

    to put it bluntly: make up your own mind, minus the nicotine.

  • yes fair enough but who are the tormentors you want us to kill?

  • Kill the chemically placed urgencies that keep us creating more and more drags, bring us closer to CANCER.

    we are not puppets.

  • bringing

  • true enough.

  • 'tis strange though... how i typed bring before bringing.

  • it basically means that the tobacco company found out them self that cigarettes are bad and to prevent anyone else to know about it they terminate the research and destroy all evidence.

  • i was talking about a comment by POOPSTOMP below 5 hours ago,it didnt make sense.

  • hahaha..uh no.

  • lol its funny how they do all this work to sell death to people

  • more animal testing. i like buying shampoos and medicines that have been tested on animals! :)

  • .....without animal testing, do you realise how many animals would be out of a job?

  • anyone who works for RJR, or any branch of big tobacco, is a brain-dead terrorist.... in desperate need of being thoroughly sodomized by an obese blue whale.

  • I also agree with vonedel.

  • OK, we know what smoking can do, and has done, but does testing still need to be conducted, after knowing the plain hard facts?.

    same dance different tune.

    and yet THEY still do animal testing.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more