I actually use photoshop and I love it. It's a great artistic tool and I use it to make digital paintings so it shouldn't be banned but it' shouldn't be used toile unrealistic pics of people.
Depends on the amount of retouching? I know photoshop really well, and it's stupidly easy to just get rid of a spot here and there, to change the colors so I look less pale. It's just like way to expensive make-up I guess?
But actually making my waist thinner, fixing my nose or enlarging my boobs, why would I want to do that. Nobody is going to believe I want from a size 6 to a 2 over night anyway ...
I disagree. The problem is how the brain processes the photo, and the words don't change that. If you hate watching torture porn movies like Saw and Hostile, do you think knowing that it's not real makes it less gross to watch? Does knowing that a gory crime scene on a TV is fake makes it less gruesome?
I wouldn't be surprised if the idea of disclaimers was introduced by magazine industry reps
themselves because they know that they won't do a damn thing.
@OmorosePanya Also, the idea of banning photoshop is unrealistic according to what? The publishing industry?
I have to wonder if this video made specifically to send a pro-photoshop message in disguise, because it sure does sound like it. Or, at the very least, to help spread an industry-endorsed (read: because it doesn't harm them) message.
It's not the photos that do the damage but the advertising context. If use brushes to paint a picture of an ideal woman and hang it in a gallery everyone instantly knows without thinking about it that I am alluding to an unattainable ideal. But If I photoshop a picture of Jennifer Anniston and add it to some text advocating her new diet, or line of clothing, then the context says that this product is what she uses to look like that and you can too.
banned for what!? EVERYONE should know by now not to take ANY image as real...every photo today is a model/CGI hybrid and that's just the way it is and people should explain that to their children
Good idea, but I don't think there should be a label in a big white box on every single page, at least put it in the corner without the big white box. Or maybe put that label in the first page.
I never compare myself to magazine celebritys, i compare myself to my friends haha. Celebrities have to look good because looking good is what they do for a living
i dont think either end of the interview was well represented. arguements weren't as good as they could have been, and they didnt interview males and females on both sides of the arguement. idk. i think they should redo this.
Hmm why stop there? Close down the Make up and Plastic surgery industries as well. If some teen age girl wants to kill herself because she can't look like the image in the magazine then let her. Get rid of her idiocy from the gene pool early.
I lol'd at some of those retouched labels: "this has been modified to lower your self esteem". Kind of sad though. I'd say society kind of dug themselves into a hole here; if the retouching didn't begin then no one would have these unrealistic expectations and thus expect to see retouched images in the 1st place. It's kind of a loop both ways and can only be scaled down slowly.
But the way we are headed, soon enough science will allow 'real life retouching" and that's a whole different topic.
The host looks like one of those girls you get on so called "amateur" porn. I kept expecting some guy to walk on and shove his d*ck down her throat! lol
Photoshop is just a tool, you can use it for comic sans glitter gifs, putting your friend's face on porn image, making girls thinner, or anything else immoral and/or tasteless, but it doesn't mean it has to be used that way. Lot of people do very beautiful art with it. People should just not buy those trashy magazines that are complete waste of paper, not ban Photoshop (which means all image editing ever).
its the fucking idiots who wanna be like what they see in the corporate whore media, and the same people most likely wouldnt understand (give a shit) about a stamp on it
YA and only woman and girls are affected, boys and man are "somehow" not affected by PS images. Give me a break, both male and female photos are edited, the sickness between the ears does not come from photoshop images.
@goglesux Well, maybe it doesn't come "only" from PS images, but it shouldn't be ruled out. My sister has had serious eating disorder for a couple of years now, to the point that she was in danger. And I've noticed that she's got more keen on tabloids. This doesn't prove causality, but I would take it as a clue.
The thing is, people can sub consciously tell when something is fake, and then we do not like it as much. Now you might look at her before she is retouched and think wow, that is kind of ugly, but the thing is, our eyes can not see in that type of quality... their camera is so good that it makes you see all the tiny things that are not meant to be seen.
you forget us real men know the diffarence. Now shutup about photo edditing there just gonna do it anyway. Its not a big deal what do you think ps was made for anyway? Making orbs? Na.
Oh yes, lets ban photoshopping pictures. While were at it, why not ban every form of media based glamorization. Then all the idiots out there can be happy with their lives, and all we had to do was sacrifice allitle bit of constitutional equity.
@CoolBreezeClub People can look LIKE that, but NOBODY has a perfectly proportioned body + perfect skin + perfect white teeth + bright eyes + ectectect. They Photoshop away EVERY flaw and NOBODY is flawless.
So far as "warning" labels go, WARNING!! WARNING ABOUT EVERYTHING CAUSES PEOPLE TO IGNORE THE MESSAGE AFTER AWHILE!!! How about dialing it back to "Notice," or "Caution," and save the WARNING!! for REAL hazards, like sulfuric acid. Or is everything too dumbed-down already?
Wow, people are attracted to smooth skin and nice bodies? HOW TERRIBLE!
Grow up people, this is reality. Only young good looking or intelligent people in this world stay on top. You can all sit at the bottom of the human ladder like a bunch of losers with your petty "morals" like it will change anything. This has been going on for millenia, and when you die alone, it will continue to go on this way until humanity kills itself with war or pollution.
Hollywood does create such an unrealistic image of "beauty." I think beauty comes from the inside and it also comes from the way you hold yourself. Be confident in the way that you look and as long as you feel healthy and happy, I don't think you should change.
Alright, everyone is against cosmetic surgery, but the least photoshop create wonderful pictures just for themselves isn't it? It's kinda too selfish for people to ban the usage of photoshop because they are confident with their own look.
im not bone thin, i have little freckles on me, i have curves, and a little junk in my trunk. i love my little imperfections i never want to have a picture of me photoshopped
Pretty much everyone under 40 that i know would realise images are shopped, everything is faked now, it's just the way it is. Even Singers use Autotune, some unable to hold a note naturally at all! Whats the difference?
Besides it is attainable, Photoshop in real life = Plastic Surgery Im afraid thats the way things are going now.
P.S Im a male and size zero does absolutely nothing for me, and from what i can tell most guys, do women think men prefer skin and bones?
some young girls want to be like that because they want to be good enough for boys. (i know i am a failure in english). because the boys think that girls are like that but it isn't.
@FarhadMinecraft I don't think you'll have to worry about that. As was said in the video, banning photoshopped images isn't exactly realistic. But I'll agree with the narrator that a disclaimer that an image was photoshopped in cases like this is not an unrealistic expectation.
If they ban photoshopped images, the next thing to attack will be autotuned vocals... where will it end? Science fiction movies are mostly computer graphics. Should we ban that as well? Gimme a break...
If they ban photoshopped images, the next thing to attack will be autotuned vocals... where will it end? Science fiction movies are mostly computer graphics. Should we ban that as well? Gimme a break...
@ToasterknowsALL okay...? They aren't talking about making art on photoshop. That isn't the point of the video..it talks about editing photos, retouching them to make celebs look perfect. Understand the point of the video first. lmfao.
why ban photoshop? how about getting kids to understand that these ain't real? isnt that better?
Imagine too many kids believe in santa claus until they are 26 years of age, and it becomes detrimental to them.. will you then BAN christmas? Or will you just tell them stupid kids that santa claus ain't real?
Sometimes, you just cannot go after a fly with a fucking NUCLEAR MISSILE
@TaintedFaith88 That's a fallacious, and well, stupid argument. Why perpetuate an artificial sense of beauty at the expense of women's emotional health? Even in a perfect world in which all of us would understand that these images are fake--if we understand that they're fake, then why artificial-ize them to begin with?
@BRIANNAistalksick yea. so go ahead and ban everything. since everything offends everyone. soon we will be sitting at our homes with no tv, and only staring at bricks and humming. since that's the only thing that wont affect anyone.
@BRIANNAistalksick Even in the days of the ancient egyptians, ant eggs were put on your eyes to make a girl look prettier. Humans have always used illusions to mask their insecurities. This is not a new phenomenon. Humans just have to learn to LIVE with it, and live with it like an intelligent person, by seeing what is stupid (and bad for your body) and what is good for you.
Stop pushing the blame and onus of controlling these life choices to the dammed state! The state can't even fix the econo
I totally agree with this! Nowadays we all want beautiful (magazine cover looking girlfriends) and so we miss the true beauty of the human body and the extraordinary human mind!
like the adds only affect the female population. This crap like most crap can be be ended at home. If parents really took a serious interest in these issues the younger generations would be better off in the long run. Or better yet teach them with photoshop so they know how fake it really is
Whether someone has an eating disorder, is obese, has plastic surgery, is dieting or exercising each person is reacting to the requirement and pressure placed on them by our society - which is to look a certain way...
Magazines are so influential on young people as they are growing up - youngsters need to grow up believing they are beautiful on the inside and gain their confidence through achievement unassociated with appearance.
BAN PHOTOSHOPPING. It's not real. It's fake and destructive.
Ya know the more shit I see like this the more I believe what other country's say about us is true...... Americans are a bunch of cry baby bitches. Photoshop I's directly hurting you? Grow a brain and grow the fuck up.
if people arnt eating because of these pictures GOOD! i mean america is getting fat and what ever cna help THEN MAKE BETTER FREKIN PHOTO SHOP PICTURES AND STARVE THE FAT WHORES! lol idk o.o
Im overweight but i dont look it. I love my body and thats all that really matters. I dont care if people have perfect bodies, in my eyes im beautful and skinny
hmm... Perfection is perfection. A realistic goal is something else.
If someone doesn't realize that these photos are views of some perfection, that's their problem for being unrealistic. Should we ban Forbes because it lowers the self-esteem of average and poor people? It's pretty much the same question.
It might cause some cases of anorexia, but don't forget the thousands of people who start practicing sports and to start a diet while they are overweight.
I just don't get how girls/woman can get so influenced by images on magazines, if i see brad pit or another "hot" guy on a cover of a magazine or somewhere else, that doesn't make me think I'm ugly or should change how I look, this is not because I am already hot, the opposite of it, I don't realy look at myself as the most attractive guy in the world, but just because there is someone who is more attractive doesn't mean I am less attractive right?
@MrHmm500 Why are they different or how are they different? I can't tell you why they are different, but evolution suggests that the feminine mentality developed in a manner conducive to continuing the human race, as did men. Men are physically stronger and tend to have developed the ability to maintain focus and manipulate mechanical things. Women compensate for lack of physical strength enhancing comfort and harmony to produce an environment conducive to successfully raising kids.
@MrHmm500 1) *Young* girls are the most at risk, because they're just beginning to think about what boys/men want. and they're the least savvy consumers of images. 2) It's VERY different for girls than for boys. Boys are still conditioned to think of their worth in terms of what they DO and how smart they are, and girls are still indoctrinated to think of their worth in terms of how pretty/sexy they are. I'm not saying their parents literally say this. It's reinforced 1000 times a day on TV.
@aleatharhea, You are wrong here: "Boys are still conditioned". This is the way men behave around the world and have behaved for thousands of years. This is the exact same way males of most species behave. That's NOT conditioning. That IS instinct. The fact that I like the soft features of a woman's body isn't conditioning. It's built in. TV didn't teach me to like women with soft skin and nice curves. I feel that in my bones.
@evikjames I didn't say boys don't like soft curves or nice skin. I drew a distinction between the things that are reinforced in girls and the things that are reinforced in boys. For the most part, traits that are encouraged in boys (smart, skilled) are constructive, while traits that are encouraged in girls (pretty, sexy) are at best inconsequential to making her a person with a happy, fullfilled life. It's destructive to encourage sexiness to the exclusion of life's more important things.
Well, I believe we all are beautiful inside, that magazine makes you beautiful, outside, I feel sorry for the person who tries, to look diferent on a photo and then gets home and sees her or his sefl in the mirror, poor people, they might cry to se that no matter what they do, they will keep on getiing old....picture or no picture....life goes on and people try to look younger, WE ARE NOT GETTING ANY YOUNGER PEOPLE, jajajajaja we are on our way to the coffingsice the day we were born. el flacu
I think that retouching and making this kind of ilusion is wrong and you are absolutely right about that! But, how about to make a little balance and make it all a little more fair? Shouldn't you have a warning or notice, that the madam has a botox or some plastic surgery? How many unhealthy messages are you sending to the masteres her age? It's not her, it's not really her underneath the surgery. But I think you are right.. there should be some warning or something under the pictures.
It was amazing, walking through a grocery store with my mother and she spots a magazine with Johnny Depp on the cover, no wrinkles, totally looks about 30. She's wondering why she's 45 and has lines on her face. 'Because, Mom, you're not a walking photoshopped image'.
Even men have to deal with this garbage, but only if they CARE enough.
@001php ageing is partly due to genetics, I realize that. But no one in my family in their 40s has lines/wrinkles. Not at all. Also if you eat right , dont smoke, and stay out of the sun, you shouldnt look much different at 40 than you do at 20. People expect to get ageing, but its not really a natural thing, its just what we choose to do. So it would be possible for a 45 year old Johnny Depp to look 30 without photo enhancement.
If you complain about photoshop corrections to photos you should also: * not wear makeup, * not color your hair, * not pluck or trim body hair, * not wear "slimming" garments or patterns, * not wear "enhancing" or "lifting" bras -- all of those things are illusions that hide the "real you". If you are prepared to concede that altering one's appearance is okay, then there is no problem with photo-editing. Just take the time to educate your sons and daughters that photos in mags are fake.
Should we put a warning on a car warning people they might crash? Should we put a warning on a plane warning people of terrorists? Should we put warnings on butter knives warning of cuts? Should we put warnings on peanut butter warning allergies./
@MightyFire There are warnings on food that the product might contain allergens. There is a warning in McDonalds that the products coffee, tea, pie are hot and it is common sense that they should be handled with caution. Everybody knows that smoking is dangerous for the health but still some countries put ugly images instead of warnings on packages. Just because we know of Photoshop and its excessive usages, that doesn't mean that a disclaimer is pointless.
My point was everything can be perceived as "dangerous". That chair your sitting on? It can snap and break your neck. Just because there is some sort of "danger" to something, doesn't mean we need to label it. If you don't understand that photos are retouched, you are either a moron, or a retard. Disclaimers and warnings are more for helping Business X avoid a lawsuit than helping the 2 dig IQ consumer. These magazines aren't dangerous at all and disclaimers would be stupid
NOT Photoshopping pictures should be banned. The host looks f****n hot in her Photoshopped pic. What's wrong with that? Nothing! In fact, it should be required for all media.
"I have never seen more dramatically sick girls...between their ears." This is just natural selection at work. Why would I want to breed with a female that was too mentally stupid to realize that popular print media is a complete farce and a propaganda tool? She deserves to wither. Moreover, a warning on a magazine is probably about as smart as a warning on a cigarette carton. If you truly want to smoke, the warning means absolutely nothing, if you don't want to smoke, the warning is old news.
@xpostal1289x That's really ignorant of you. Do you know what the word "sick" means? It means that they don't voluntarily think that way. Take it from someone who knows, they don't want to be that way and it's not just because of the media. It's not stupidity, eating disorders are mental illnesses just like clinical depression, anxiety, PTSD, schizophrenia, ect. are illnesses. Try and have some compassion instead of thinking you know everything.
@TheErickaJane Your grouping of example diseases is idiotic. A 2000 Duke University study demonstrated that merely exercising was more effective than taking depression drugs (Talk to your doctor to see if getting off your ass is right for you!) PTSD has a clear demonstrable cause, namely, a highly traumatic event. Schizophrenia is actually a medical disorder. Both PTSD and Schiz. you cannot will yourself to have. However, you can voluntarily choose to starve yourself or vomit up your guts.
@TheErickaJane In short, eating disorders are self-imposed. People can chose to be obese fat asses in the same way that they can choose to be twigs. The fat ass merely has to eat less and exercise more, the twig merely has to eat more and exercise less. Both "diseases" can be cured merely by changing the amount of trips one takes to the kitchen, and treating the conditions as "diseases" merely reinforces the idea that individuals are powerless, which is not only wrong but counterproductive.
@xpostal1289x I'm sorry, but you're wrong. A person with a TRUE eating disorder can't just decide one day to eat more or to get healthy, they need help. Straight from the DSM: "Though some individuals may acknowledge being thin, they typically deny the serious medical implications of their malnourished state." The fact that eating disorders are in the DSM at all proves that they're mental illnesses. To diminish it is disrespectful and callous.
@TheErickaJane Yet again you weigh in with moronic pronouncements. "The fact that eating disorders are in the DSM at all proves that they're mental illnesses." Homosexuality used to be in the DSM until the 80s. Does that prove that homosexuality is a mental illness? If the DSM said being a woman was a mental illness, what would that prove? Your appeal to authority not only skirts a legitimate response to my multiple objections, but it's also laughable for being so dumb.
This irritates me so much and also makes me feel so stupid. I know no one can be perfect and i think people should except the way they come and others will appreciate that about that person. But what irritates me the most is that these people have been deceiving young girls eyes (me being one of them) and making us do stupid things to get results that aren't even real. I think its cool, but over-used in our society.
@WalkingFishes just have confidence in what you have and find positive things about yourself and admire those wonderful physiques and you can improve on certain things you are not as proud of. But there will be something a person can like about you, trust me.
Personally, I see nothing wrong with photo shopping images. It's a hobby. It's a job. But I do know that it lowers self esteem, I know it;s lowered mine several times. That's why I agree with the idea of putting a disclaimer of sorts on retouched images, I believe it would help out teenagers ALOT with their confidence,
You have to assume that every photo you see in a magazine has been retouched. If a photo for a product hasn't, they'll usually tell you that because it's a good marketing technique, it says either "look how pure and wholesome our company is" or "look how amazing our product is, it looks perfect with no Photoshop"
And honestly? Writing that a photo has been retouched will not help prevent eating disorders.
Funny side-effect where every one call it "photoshop" where Photoshop its actual name of popular application, process itself its simply retouching. Surely company hit the jackpot due this
Girls should live their own lifes not thinking : wow i really am far from being like thins woman in the magazine ...
I'm a girl and now i LOVE myself , but to years ago i used to cry cause i wasnt like the girls in the magazines and that used to drive me crazy ! We should live our lifes knowing that no one is perfect and that being healthy and happy is more important that load of shit of photoshop !
I am glad I don't feel too insecure looking at the magazines. Seeing the difference between her first photo and the second touched up in the first video, I would like to say that real humans are beautiful to me and seeing the difference it almost makes me feel like I'm staring at a fake avatar in magazine pictures now, so it really doesn't matter...
she still looks good without photoshop!
ManuelitaCardona 4 days ago 3
I actually use photoshop and I love it. It's a great artistic tool and I use it to make digital paintings so it shouldn't be banned but it' shouldn't be used toile unrealistic pics of people.
GeorgiaFraietta 1 week ago
@GeorgiaFraietta this is about whether or not retouching should be banned not photoshop
prodigy1605 1 week ago
Yes it should be said!!
vbarrefull 1 week ago
Depends on the amount of retouching? I know photoshop really well, and it's stupidly easy to just get rid of a spot here and there, to change the colors so I look less pale. It's just like way to expensive make-up I guess?
But actually making my waist thinner, fixing my nose or enlarging my boobs, why would I want to do that. Nobody is going to believe I want from a size 6 to a 2 over night anyway ...
svdm83 1 week ago
434 people don't have photoshop.
demeet2k 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I disagree. The problem is how the brain processes the photo, and the words don't change that. If you hate watching torture porn movies like Saw and Hostile, do you think knowing that it's not real makes it less gross to watch? Does knowing that a gory crime scene on a TV is fake makes it less gruesome?
I wouldn't be surprised if the idea of disclaimers was introduced by magazine industry reps
themselves because they know that they won't do a damn thing.
It needs to be BANNED.
OmorosePanya 1 week ago
@OmorosePanya Also, the idea of banning photoshop is unrealistic according to what? The publishing industry?
I have to wonder if this video made specifically to send a pro-photoshop message in disguise, because it sure does sound like it. Or, at the very least, to help spread an industry-endorsed (read: because it doesn't harm them) message.
OmorosePanya 1 week ago
They should post the real photos on their site
Voldyrule 2 weeks ago
Put the stop on photoshopping!
huffari 2 weeks ago
dumb bitch question "why have they not done anything" MONEH BAY BEH.
EndureFocusEngageDie 2 weeks ago
It's not the photos that do the damage but the advertising context. If use brushes to paint a picture of an ideal woman and hang it in a gallery everyone instantly knows without thinking about it that I am alluding to an unattainable ideal. But If I photoshop a picture of Jennifer Anniston and add it to some text advocating her new diet, or line of clothing, then the context says that this product is what she uses to look like that and you can too.
Reboot809 3 weeks ago
having sex with photoshop, lol...
when i die, imma hook up god with some photoshop
qx4n9e1xp 3 weeks ago
What about movies in HD that show more flaws? Is that like the balance?
glict 3 weeks ago
and that is why photoshop cost a lot of money l0l
digitalmus 3 weeks ago
LMFAO xD Warning:This photo has been retouched to lower your self esteem! lol mann all i can say is I feel better:)
tweetyrocks818 1 month ago 3
yes photoshop should be banned, and prevent image distortion issues, and stop setting false examples
Branditheone 1 month ago
0:08 Botox??
SchmidtFilms86 1 month ago
Put a logo on the photos that hasn't been retouched
Lazie4life 1 month ago
meanwhile in Africa...
leschica4u 1 month ago 4
With or without photoshop, the blond girl is absolutely beautiful!
Latszee 1 month ago 2
No more watermarks on pornography, please.
It's cutting into my meatslapping time.
YakuzaJoe88 1 month ago
Self-conscious bitches. Women problem in first world countries.
PimpMatt0 1 month ago
boobs brought me here
ivanatotra 1 month ago 2
this is why i prefer porn
laxball535 1 month ago 2
banned for what!? EVERYONE should know by now not to take ANY image as real...every photo today is a model/CGI hybrid and that's just the way it is and people should explain that to their children
Kunoichified 1 month ago
Good idea, but I don't think there should be a label in a big white box on every single page, at least put it in the corner without the big white box. Or maybe put that label in the first page.
VannaCuppycake13 1 month ago
YES IT SHOULD BE BANNED BUT IT GIVES PPL A JOB
xxkEtchUpxx1 2 months ago
Why should everyone look like a barbie? :s
Springfairy92 2 months ago
0:41
Her posture is the same as everyone watching this video.
dkidane 2 months ago 42
@dkidane uhm... first, I'm a male, second, I'm 18. I dont think I look like her O_o
ChippZanuff93 2 weeks ago
@dkidane I'll be damned if I ever in my life sit like that! A lot of people do though...and i don't like it.
Valerius2316 1 week ago
I never compare myself to magazine celebritys, i compare myself to my friends haha. Celebrities have to look good because looking good is what they do for a living
CourtneyJadeex 2 months ago
i dont think either end of the interview was well represented. arguements weren't as good as they could have been, and they didnt interview males and females on both sides of the arguement. idk. i think they should redo this.
stupify62 2 months ago
Hmm why stop there? Close down the Make up and Plastic surgery industries as well. If some teen age girl wants to kill herself because she can't look like the image in the magazine then let her. Get rid of her idiocy from the gene pool early.
Brashenn 2 months ago
How did I get here from watching Crysis graphics videos?!
snake6483 2 months ago 2
teach more people how to photoshop so everyone knows how it's done and how to tell.
pwnmonkeyisreal 2 months ago
This girl is just butthurt
Marle111 2 months ago
I lol'd at some of those retouched labels: "this has been modified to lower your self esteem". Kind of sad though. I'd say society kind of dug themselves into a hole here; if the retouching didn't begin then no one would have these unrealistic expectations and thus expect to see retouched images in the 1st place. It's kind of a loop both ways and can only be scaled down slowly.
But the way we are headed, soon enough science will allow 'real life retouching" and that's a whole different topic.
Pzypro 2 months ago
Sarah, i think your sexy without photo-shop ;)
skimkingnl 2 months ago
why do she talks like that ???? im afraid D:
diegushio91 2 months ago
The host looks like one of those girls you get on so called "amateur" porn. I kept expecting some guy to walk on and shove his d*ck down her throat! lol
jwfastback 2 months ago
@jwfastback I don't blame you, but that's probably because you're watching too much porn ! :)
Baliwog 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
photoshop cs5 free download no more sharecash links!! - watch?v=QrYzg9zBfng
websitemaster7799 2 months ago
Photoshop is just a tool, you can use it for comic sans glitter gifs, putting your friend's face on porn image, making girls thinner, or anything else immoral and/or tasteless, but it doesn't mean it has to be used that way. Lot of people do very beautiful art with it. People should just not buy those trashy magazines that are complete waste of paper, not ban Photoshop (which means all image editing ever).
SuperMsifiableful 2 months ago
its the fucking idiots who wanna be like what they see in the corporate whore media, and the same people most likely wouldnt understand (give a shit) about a stamp on it
TomaCukor 3 months ago
YA and only woman and girls are affected, boys and man are "somehow" not affected by PS images. Give me a break, both male and female photos are edited, the sickness between the ears does not come from photoshop images.
goglesux 3 months ago 3
@goglesux Well, maybe it doesn't come "only" from PS images, but it shouldn't be ruled out. My sister has had serious eating disorder for a couple of years now, to the point that she was in danger. And I've noticed that she's got more keen on tabloids. This doesn't prove causality, but I would take it as a clue.
Baliwog 2 months ago
@Baliwog
Eating disorder is a problem,from between the ears.
Makeup and cosmetic industry does not likes photoshop, thats all.
takes away the customers.
so PS had to be painted as the devil it slef,contributing to wordwide shockwave of terror and horror.
can't rule it out, or say it is defaco the thing that started eating disorder.
I do not expect most to understand the wisdom between these lines :D
goglesux 2 months ago
The thing is, people can sub consciously tell when something is fake, and then we do not like it as much. Now you might look at her before she is retouched and think wow, that is kind of ugly, but the thing is, our eyes can not see in that type of quality... their camera is so good that it makes you see all the tiny things that are not meant to be seen.
dolerbom 3 months ago
you forget us real men know the diffarence. Now shutup about photo edditing there just gonna do it anyway. Its not a big deal what do you think ps was made for anyway? Making orbs? Na.
snakev10v5 3 months ago
just put the Adobe PS logo on photo's
kalyndahaaf 3 months ago 85
@kalyndahaaf or in fine print put 'Edited by ------'
eagleandy1 1 month ago
@kalyndahaaf
Great idea! I second that!
chumark54 3 weeks ago
i think yes. it should be said on magazine that the photo has been retouched!! :<
veroniqu123 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh yes, lets ban photoshopping pictures. While were at it, why not ban every form of media based glamorization. Then all the idiots out there can be happy with their lives, and all we had to do was sacrifice allitle bit of constitutional equity.
MrDarkemblem 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrDarkemblem 3 months ago
Yes, it is an unrealistic image to portray. NO ONE actually looks like that.
GeekGraphic 3 months ago
@GeekGraphic My wife looked like that until she started eating at fast food restaurants....
CoolBreezeClub 3 months ago
@CoolBreezeClub People can look LIKE that, but NOBODY has a perfectly proportioned body + perfect skin + perfect white teeth + bright eyes + ectectect. They Photoshop away EVERY flaw and NOBODY is flawless.
GeekGraphic 3 months ago
Stupids labels. Maybe just let it be, or inform the girls?! Hate labels... also on my cigerats. omg
Vincentmahone 3 months ago
So far as "warning" labels go, WARNING!! WARNING ABOUT EVERYTHING CAUSES PEOPLE TO IGNORE THE MESSAGE AFTER AWHILE!!! How about dialing it back to "Notice," or "Caution," and save the WARNING!! for REAL hazards, like sulfuric acid. Or is everything too dumbed-down already?
greengringo2003 3 months ago
Ban it :o
GeekyGirlyShadow 3 months ago
Wow, people are attracted to smooth skin and nice bodies? HOW TERRIBLE!
Grow up people, this is reality. Only young good looking or intelligent people in this world stay on top. You can all sit at the bottom of the human ladder like a bunch of losers with your petty "morals" like it will change anything. This has been going on for millenia, and when you die alone, it will continue to go on this way until humanity kills itself with war or pollution.
ElnAlter 3 months ago
Yes they should be banned!
MissDisette 3 months ago
Hollywood does create such an unrealistic image of "beauty." I think beauty comes from the inside and it also comes from the way you hold yourself. Be confident in the way that you look and as long as you feel healthy and happy, I don't think you should change.
saintpattysday16 3 months ago
Alright, everyone is against cosmetic surgery, but the least photoshop create wonderful pictures just for themselves isn't it? It's kinda too selfish for people to ban the usage of photoshop because they are confident with their own look.
LimHwee 3 months ago
That and make up explains gay people
orlin258 3 months ago
im not bone thin, i have little freckles on me, i have curves, and a little junk in my trunk. i love my little imperfections i never want to have a picture of me photoshopped
lilcheynestoke 3 months ago
Am I the only one who clicked the video cause there were boobs in the thumbnail?
MitchellTiwon 3 months ago
@MitchellTiwon no
ispawn2own 3 months ago
Once eating disorders were more physical instead of mental? Thats such bullshit.
geganobo 3 months ago
LOL i just ran to the kitchen and ate a taco (; i aint getting no eating disorder
michelle10283 3 months ago 2
Pretty much everyone under 40 that i know would realise images are shopped, everything is faked now, it's just the way it is. Even Singers use Autotune, some unable to hold a note naturally at all! Whats the difference?
Besides it is attainable, Photoshop in real life = Plastic Surgery Im afraid thats the way things are going now.
P.S Im a male and size zero does absolutely nothing for me, and from what i can tell most guys, do women think men prefer skin and bones?
ElroyHarvey 3 months ago
is it all about digital photos.can picasa or photoshop do something about the non digital ones taken a century back.
12345678912215 3 months ago
some young girls want to be like that because they want to be good enough for boys. (i know i am a failure in english). because the boys think that girls are like that but it isn't.
paddyanouk 3 months ago
@FarhadMinecraft I don't think you'll have to worry about that. As was said in the video, banning photoshopped images isn't exactly realistic. But I'll agree with the narrator that a disclaimer that an image was photoshopped in cases like this is not an unrealistic expectation.
dantesinfernal0 3 months ago
If we were to ban every single thing that marketing does to deceive people, we would have to ban marketing altogether!
joaosing 3 months ago
The thumbnail effect. It did us click for this video.
TheSeriousStone 3 months ago
Thumbs up if u clicked only for the video pic.
Kosichful 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If they ban photoshopped images, the next thing to attack will be autotuned vocals... where will it end? Science fiction movies are mostly computer graphics. Should we ban that as well? Gimme a break...
ElijahBailey2000 4 months ago
If they ban photoshopped images, the next thing to attack will be autotuned vocals... where will it end? Science fiction movies are mostly computer graphics. Should we ban that as well? Gimme a break...
ElijahBailey2000 4 months ago
Photoshop isn't just for editing photos, idiots. My sister is an artist and uses photoshop to make her art.
ToasterknowsALL 4 months ago 2
@ToasterknowsALL okay...? They aren't talking about making art on photoshop. That isn't the point of the video..it talks about editing photos, retouching them to make celebs look perfect. Understand the point of the video first. lmfao.
Smileyy74 4 months ago
@Smileyy74 Art is art, no matter if your altering photo's, or if you are starting from scratch, I think.
ToasterknowsALL 3 months ago
It's like ooooh your kids are overweight... BAN MACDONALDS.
Wtf? Just get them to eat less? Teach them that junk food ain't healthy?
Is it THAT hard to tell people to take personal initiative? Abolishing these things only take personal responsibility AWAY from individuals.
TaintedFaith88 4 months ago
why ban photoshop? how about getting kids to understand that these ain't real? isnt that better?
Imagine too many kids believe in santa claus until they are 26 years of age, and it becomes detrimental to them.. will you then BAN christmas? Or will you just tell them stupid kids that santa claus ain't real?
Sometimes, you just cannot go after a fly with a fucking NUCLEAR MISSILE
TaintedFaith88 4 months ago
@TaintedFaith88 That's a fallacious, and well, stupid argument. Why perpetuate an artificial sense of beauty at the expense of women's emotional health? Even in a perfect world in which all of us would understand that these images are fake--if we understand that they're fake, then why artificial-ize them to begin with?
BRIANNAistalksick 4 months ago
@BRIANNAistalksick yea. so go ahead and ban everything. since everything offends everyone. soon we will be sitting at our homes with no tv, and only staring at bricks and humming. since that's the only thing that wont affect anyone.
TaintedFaith88 3 months ago
@BRIANNAistalksick Even in the days of the ancient egyptians, ant eggs were put on your eyes to make a girl look prettier. Humans have always used illusions to mask their insecurities. This is not a new phenomenon. Humans just have to learn to LIVE with it, and live with it like an intelligent person, by seeing what is stupid (and bad for your body) and what is good for you.
Stop pushing the blame and onus of controlling these life choices to the dammed state! The state can't even fix the econo
TaintedFaith88 3 months ago
I totally agree with this! Nowadays we all want beautiful (magazine cover looking girlfriends) and so we miss the true beauty of the human body and the extraordinary human mind!
And i speak for myself!
petruz1993 4 months ago
uhm that warnings on the magazines might be very funny to read :)
Tryllly 4 months ago
how did i get here?
MrsTokyo 4 months ago 94
@MrsTokyo I'm asking that myself it was in my suggested videos :O LOL
jjammmees 4 months ago
@MrsTokyo All I came for 1:50
1NorMel 1 month ago
@MrsTokyo The door opened, and you got in.
SGTPOONISHER 1 month ago
@MrsTokyo HOLY SHIT! I was watching 3DS trailers just a few moments ago xD
MrBAWgaming 1 month ago
like the adds only affect the female population. This crap like most crap can be be ended at home. If parents really took a serious interest in these issues the younger generations would be better off in the long run. Or better yet teach them with photoshop so they know how fake it really is
B3ast72 4 months ago
Allow me to cut to the chase. The document is right on in terms of the link associated with emotional health and imagery!
Now in term of Sarah Beck, she does not need any touch-ups at all. She's beautiful: indeed.
MarineChaps 4 months ago
i hate this theres no beauty in whats not real
angelzxox555 4 months ago
do we know what behind a womans mind?
I never know and can t tell you and afcourse i am a guy
arjanbg 4 months ago
Whether someone has an eating disorder, is obese, has plastic surgery, is dieting or exercising each person is reacting to the requirement and pressure placed on them by our society - which is to look a certain way...
Magazines are so influential on young people as they are growing up - youngsters need to grow up believing they are beautiful on the inside and gain their confidence through achievement unassociated with appearance.
BAN PHOTOSHOPPING. It's not real. It's fake and destructive.
sarannec79 4 months ago in playlist Photoshop Effects
Ya know the more shit I see like this the more I believe what other country's say about us is true...... Americans are a bunch of cry baby bitches. Photoshop I's directly hurting you? Grow a brain and grow the fuck up.
sn1pedyou 4 months ago
I'm gonna get that image of her and photoshop it so her bra disappears.
Error404AccessDenied 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Society killed the teenager.
pandac0ffee 4 months ago
Society killed the teenager.
pandac0ffee 4 months ago
WTF, what that guy does is easy, I could make good money right now...
Dymamyd 4 months ago
if people arnt eating because of these pictures GOOD! i mean america is getting fat and what ever cna help THEN MAKE BETTER FREKIN PHOTO SHOP PICTURES AND STARVE THE FAT WHORES! lol idk o.o
ronGryffindor 4 months ago
This old woman is so stupid.
youmadbro96 4 months ago
Im overweight but i dont look it. I love my body and thats all that really matters. I dont care if people have perfect bodies, in my eyes im beautful and skinny
BlondieDancer24 4 months ago
What ever happened to good parenting do we need a god damn label on everything to tell idiots that things in the media are not real.
DanGroenhof 4 months ago
hmm... Perfection is perfection. A realistic goal is something else.
If someone doesn't realize that these photos are views of some perfection, that's their problem for being unrealistic. Should we ban Forbes because it lowers the self-esteem of average and poor people? It's pretty much the same question.
It might cause some cases of anorexia, but don't forget the thousands of people who start practicing sports and to start a diet while they are overweight.
jsboutin3 4 months ago
Perfection = perfect, could not be better.
Doesn't mean it has to be achiviable!
Derp derp.
RuneFinity44 4 months ago
I just don't get how girls/woman can get so influenced by images on magazines, if i see brad pit or another "hot" guy on a cover of a magazine or somewhere else, that doesn't make me think I'm ugly or should change how I look, this is not because I am already hot, the opposite of it, I don't realy look at myself as the most attractive guy in the world, but just because there is someone who is more attractive doesn't mean I am less attractive right?
MrHmm500 4 months ago
@MrHmm500, Of course you don't see what they see. You're not a woman.
evikjames 4 months ago
@evikjames THAT'S SEXIST.
kjevo 4 months ago
@evikjames I get that, but can you explain to me why?
MrHmm500 4 months ago
@MrHmm500 Why are they different or how are they different? I can't tell you why they are different, but evolution suggests that the feminine mentality developed in a manner conducive to continuing the human race, as did men. Men are physically stronger and tend to have developed the ability to maintain focus and manipulate mechanical things. Women compensate for lack of physical strength enhancing comfort and harmony to produce an environment conducive to successfully raising kids.
evikjames 4 months ago
@evikjames Sorry but you just a bit right, the Focus and manipulating of mechanical things.
Males are not better at that, however the rest is right.
nisteven 4 months ago
@MrHmm500 1) *Young* girls are the most at risk, because they're just beginning to think about what boys/men want. and they're the least savvy consumers of images. 2) It's VERY different for girls than for boys. Boys are still conditioned to think of their worth in terms of what they DO and how smart they are, and girls are still indoctrinated to think of their worth in terms of how pretty/sexy they are. I'm not saying their parents literally say this. It's reinforced 1000 times a day on TV.
aleatharhea 4 months ago
@aleatharhea, You are wrong here: "Boys are still conditioned". This is the way men behave around the world and have behaved for thousands of years. This is the exact same way males of most species behave. That's NOT conditioning. That IS instinct. The fact that I like the soft features of a woman's body isn't conditioning. It's built in. TV didn't teach me to like women with soft skin and nice curves. I feel that in my bones.
evikjames 4 months ago
@evikjames I didn't say boys don't like soft curves or nice skin. I drew a distinction between the things that are reinforced in girls and the things that are reinforced in boys. For the most part, traits that are encouraged in boys (smart, skilled) are constructive, while traits that are encouraged in girls (pretty, sexy) are at best inconsequential to making her a person with a happy, fullfilled life. It's destructive to encourage sexiness to the exclusion of life's more important things.
aleatharhea 1 week ago
pause it at 1:08, the woman looks crazy
germancarfan8195 4 months ago
I think she looked better unphotoshoped.
norwegianunicycle 4 months ago
oh get over it.
KristianMarque 4 months ago
Well, I believe we all are beautiful inside, that magazine makes you beautiful, outside, I feel sorry for the person who tries, to look diferent on a photo and then gets home and sees her or his sefl in the mirror, poor people, they might cry to se that no matter what they do, they will keep on getiing old....picture or no picture....life goes on and people try to look younger, WE ARE NOT GETTING ANY YOUNGER PEOPLE, jajajajaja we are on our way to the coffingsice the day we were born. el flacu
putarraco10 4 months ago
I think that retouching and making this kind of ilusion is wrong and you are absolutely right about that! But, how about to make a little balance and make it all a little more fair? Shouldn't you have a warning or notice, that the madam has a botox or some plastic surgery? How many unhealthy messages are you sending to the masteres her age? It's not her, it's not really her underneath the surgery. But I think you are right.. there should be some warning or something under the pictures.
dextrush 4 months ago
It was amazing, walking through a grocery store with my mother and she spots a magazine with Johnny Depp on the cover, no wrinkles, totally looks about 30. She's wondering why she's 45 and has lines on her face. 'Because, Mom, you're not a walking photoshopped image'.
Even men have to deal with this garbage, but only if they CARE enough.
Pro-tip from men: just stop caring.
001php 4 months ago 59
@001php ageing is partly due to genetics, I realize that. But no one in my family in their 40s has lines/wrinkles. Not at all. Also if you eat right , dont smoke, and stay out of the sun, you shouldnt look much different at 40 than you do at 20. People expect to get ageing, but its not really a natural thing, its just what we choose to do. So it would be possible for a 45 year old Johnny Depp to look 30 without photo enhancement.
VASINGER 4 months ago
@VASINGER Face shape changes when you age too, though. It's not skin deep, it's bone deep. :D
My source: stage make-up class.
But very true. If my mum hadn't smoked, she probably wouldn't have as many lines as she does right now.
001php 4 months ago
@001php i never cared
victor714ps3 3 months ago
that girl has one huge cammel.... back
llVIU 4 months ago
If you complain about photoshop corrections to photos you should also: * not wear makeup, * not color your hair, * not pluck or trim body hair, * not wear "slimming" garments or patterns, * not wear "enhancing" or "lifting" bras -- all of those things are illusions that hide the "real you". If you are prepared to concede that altering one's appearance is okay, then there is no problem with photo-editing. Just take the time to educate your sons and daughters that photos in mags are fake.
PlasteredDragon 4 months ago
Should we put a warning on a car warning people they might crash? Should we put a warning on a plane warning people of terrorists? Should we put warnings on butter knives warning of cuts? Should we put warnings on peanut butter warning allergies./
MightyFire 4 months ago
@MightyFire There are warnings on food that the product might contain allergens. There is a warning in McDonalds that the products coffee, tea, pie are hot and it is common sense that they should be handled with caution. Everybody knows that smoking is dangerous for the health but still some countries put ugly images instead of warnings on packages. Just because we know of Photoshop and its excessive usages, that doesn't mean that a disclaimer is pointless.
SielofJM 4 months ago
@SielofJM
My point was everything can be perceived as "dangerous". That chair your sitting on? It can snap and break your neck. Just because there is some sort of "danger" to something, doesn't mean we need to label it. If you don't understand that photos are retouched, you are either a moron, or a retard. Disclaimers and warnings are more for helping Business X avoid a lawsuit than helping the 2 dig IQ consumer. These magazines aren't dangerous at all and disclaimers would be stupid
MightyFire 4 months ago
but its true tho all those magazines the girls are starting too feel fatter and uglier by every pape they look at
koen075zaanstad 4 months ago
shes fucking hot dude
koen075zaanstad 4 months ago
60% of Americans are overweight....
Lolitakira 5 months ago 138
@Lolitakira and 30%germans but its not even better :D
DerKuhleKlaun 4 months ago
@Lolitakira 70........
TheTorbjoern 4 months ago
@Lolitakira Its 67% O_O
LlameStarcraft 4 months ago 3
@Lolitakira You mean 99%
Maximalnoob 4 months ago
@Lolitakira 90% of that 60 are male
ThisVidSuxAss 4 months ago
whats real anymore? what , is , real , these , days? can someone please tell me .
NightWolfBeast 5 months ago
how the FUCK does photoshop lower the self esteem of girls.
unknown188888888 5 months ago
Damn, that other woman needs to be Photoshopped. The host is fine.
gillettecrackers 5 months ago
NOT Photoshopping pictures should be banned. The host looks f****n hot in her Photoshopped pic. What's wrong with that? Nothing! In fact, it should be required for all media.
thinkbigize 5 months ago
Photoshop shouldn't be banned. it really wasn't made for making an image of "perfection".
Artwriter590 5 months ago
free brown bags for evrybodeeeeee!
kuntyfucstik 5 months ago
> What is a more reasonable approach to warn people about the excessive use of Photoshop in the media?
Remind people that it's IN THE MEDIA.
You act surprised that they would make pictures that are lies to go along with their ENTIRE REST OF THEIR CONTENT that are also lies?
You can't out-warn human gullibility.
rkyeun 5 months ago
lol at the warning 3:10
Zathorith555 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey everyone I need subs!!! im trying to get products to review on my channel.
when i get new subs i can get the products and review them PLEASE HELP.
I WILL HAVE GIVE AWAYS! :) thank you will also sub back
Reviewz11 5 months ago
What is real? That is absolutely correct. Every Photoshopped picture should be labeled so everyone knows.
bkdmd 5 months ago
lol good luck getting those disclaimers on there. On a side note, the host looks prettier without the Photoshop.
Kimusubi1 5 months ago
sure a smoking company would put smokers die younger on their packages so people buy less
LOL
aleprbla 5 months ago
"I have never seen more dramatically sick girls...between their ears." This is just natural selection at work. Why would I want to breed with a female that was too mentally stupid to realize that popular print media is a complete farce and a propaganda tool? She deserves to wither. Moreover, a warning on a magazine is probably about as smart as a warning on a cigarette carton. If you truly want to smoke, the warning means absolutely nothing, if you don't want to smoke, the warning is old news.
xpostal1289x 5 months ago
@xpostal1289x That's really ignorant of you. Do you know what the word "sick" means? It means that they don't voluntarily think that way. Take it from someone who knows, they don't want to be that way and it's not just because of the media. It's not stupidity, eating disorders are mental illnesses just like clinical depression, anxiety, PTSD, schizophrenia, ect. are illnesses. Try and have some compassion instead of thinking you know everything.
TheErickaJane 5 months ago
@TheErickaJane Your grouping of example diseases is idiotic. A 2000 Duke University study demonstrated that merely exercising was more effective than taking depression drugs (Talk to your doctor to see if getting off your ass is right for you!) PTSD has a clear demonstrable cause, namely, a highly traumatic event. Schizophrenia is actually a medical disorder. Both PTSD and Schiz. you cannot will yourself to have. However, you can voluntarily choose to starve yourself or vomit up your guts.
xpostal1289x 5 months ago
@TheErickaJane In short, eating disorders are self-imposed. People can chose to be obese fat asses in the same way that they can choose to be twigs. The fat ass merely has to eat less and exercise more, the twig merely has to eat more and exercise less. Both "diseases" can be cured merely by changing the amount of trips one takes to the kitchen, and treating the conditions as "diseases" merely reinforces the idea that individuals are powerless, which is not only wrong but counterproductive.
xpostal1289x 5 months ago
@xpostal1289x I'm sorry, but you're wrong. A person with a TRUE eating disorder can't just decide one day to eat more or to get healthy, they need help. Straight from the DSM: "Though some individuals may acknowledge being thin, they typically deny the serious medical implications of their malnourished state." The fact that eating disorders are in the DSM at all proves that they're mental illnesses. To diminish it is disrespectful and callous.
TheErickaJane 5 months ago
@TheErickaJane Yet again you weigh in with moronic pronouncements. "The fact that eating disorders are in the DSM at all proves that they're mental illnesses." Homosexuality used to be in the DSM until the 80s. Does that prove that homosexuality is a mental illness? If the DSM said being a woman was a mental illness, what would that prove? Your appeal to authority not only skirts a legitimate response to my multiple objections, but it's also laughable for being so dumb.
xpostal1289x 5 months ago
@xpostal1289x Alright, you know what? I'm so over this argument. We're just going to have to agree to disagree.
TheErickaJane 5 months ago
@TheErickaJane I consider this a victory.
xpostal1289x 5 months ago
shes hot and beautiful without photoshop
joseleandro75 5 months ago 3
This irritates me so much and also makes me feel so stupid. I know no one can be perfect and i think people should except the way they come and others will appreciate that about that person. But what irritates me the most is that these people have been deceiving young girls eyes (me being one of them) and making us do stupid things to get results that aren't even real. I think its cool, but over-used in our society.
WalkingFishes 5 months ago
@WalkingFishes just have confidence in what you have and find positive things about yourself and admire those wonderful physiques and you can improve on certain things you are not as proud of. But there will be something a person can like about you, trust me.
WalkingFishes 5 months ago
I like how there is a Portrait Professional photo editing software ad next to this video.
J0hannski 5 months ago 2
Personally, I see nothing wrong with photo shopping images. It's a hobby. It's a job. But I do know that it lowers self esteem, I know it;s lowered mine several times. That's why I agree with the idea of putting a disclaimer of sorts on retouched images, I believe it would help out teenagers ALOT with their confidence,
BotchStoleMyRamenDX 5 months ago 3
You have to assume that every photo you see in a magazine has been retouched. If a photo for a product hasn't, they'll usually tell you that because it's a good marketing technique, it says either "look how pure and wholesome our company is" or "look how amazing our product is, it looks perfect with no Photoshop"
And honestly? Writing that a photo has been retouched will not help prevent eating disorders.
admiralpeanutbutter 5 months ago
I'm sorry but if a woman can look at a picture of another woman and develop an eating disorder, she might be retarded. Or looking at a Bush wife.
yeaiskateduh 5 months ago
thumbs up if u think she looks hot without photo shop
Rangnahan48 5 months ago 3
Funny side-effect where every one call it "photoshop" where Photoshop its actual name of popular application, process itself its simply retouching. Surely company hit the jackpot due this
xNerfpl 5 months ago
Girls should live their own lifes not thinking : wow i really am far from being like thins woman in the magazine ...
I'm a girl and now i LOVE myself , but to years ago i used to cry cause i wasnt like the girls in the magazines and that used to drive me crazy ! We should live our lifes knowing that no one is perfect and that being healthy and happy is more important that load of shit of photoshop !
CommentQueen304 5 months ago 3
I am glad I don't feel too insecure looking at the magazines. Seeing the difference between her first photo and the second touched up in the first video, I would like to say that real humans are beautiful to me and seeing the difference it almost makes me feel like I'm staring at a fake avatar in magazine pictures now, so it really doesn't matter...
SimplyCecileP 5 months ago