Interview with Lara Terstenjak, spokeperson of GoTopless.org

[Alfarojv]

yes,people jerk off in public when they see a girl in bikini...we are men

[icytazmanian]

@kingcobra12899: I suggest that if most women went topless, there would be less to jerk off about. We are only sexually excited at the idea because it is taboo. You dont see men jerking off in public about exposed legs in short skirts do you? In times past, it was said that men would get a hard on when they see table legs because the sight of any leg was a novelty.

[DeaddudeRS]

The fact that men are very visual creatures and that hiding what were trying to visualize will only make them want to see the things your hiding from view due to men's visual nature. this has lead greatly in our society to the over hype of Women's breasts in our Society.

[1TopGunPaintballer]

@DeaddudeRS True because now I want to see more pussy.

[grendal742007]

From burqa to topless is a BIG difference. Titty equality is not a big priority in 2012 but world hanger and war.

[jordan5ans]

shut up go to the kitchen and get me my beer

[mayhempk1backup1]

She actually makes a good point about attractive legs not being less attractive because they are visible.

[loveherlips]

equality ?

but men dont have fakes nipples / pasties on their man boobs

[70scarrestoguy]

Let them go topless if they want to. I live in central NH, it's not uncommon to see young women swimming nude at a lake or swimming hole along a river.While driving through Vermont a few years ago, we exited Interstate 91 to get gasoline & eat lunch.We were surprised to see many young attractive people walking around the town completely nude. I asked about the nudity & was informed that Vermont has no laws against public nudity. I was told that a person could walk into a Mall completely nude-

[70scarrestoguy]

@70scarrestoguy but that person could be asked to leave if they were clothed but stripped in public. Makes no sense to me but I'm not complaining about the rights of Vermont's citizens.

[cathalena1]

why are there so many men there ?Its not because they want to see boobs surely.

[jonathanspindler]

if you press 3 over and over she talks about how her mouth feels after a spliff!!!

[WhItEFoG17]

ok let the dumb cunts do it, and for wile they will get sick of a men making sexual re-marks and wine and cry about it.

[unstroxii]

Not all "men" are created equal... if so I could pain like Leonardo Divinci... or write music like Beethoven, or fight like Chuck Norris.... and plus most of these girls are fugly and fat... not something I wanna see...

[AgentGhost]

@unstroxii

Not your choice to make.

[unstroxii]

@AgentGhost Its no ones choice, its simple logic no one is equal. We seek equality yes, but its simple logic we're arnt equal.

[AgentGhost]

@unstroxii

I agree it is simple but you don't seem to understand the debate, your point about not wanting to see ugly people naked makes no sense. It doesn't matter what you like or don't like to see, people don't live to serve you. It's not a question of want, it's a question of providing a basic freedom. I don't like what many people say for example but I recognize their right to say it. I don't pay taxes so the government can be a little dictator and make arbitrary laws about fashion.

[unstroxii]

@AgentGhost Ok, but there's nudist colonys. If they want to be naked so bad, they can go live there. What if children grew up in an environment where everyone is naked? What do you think they'll be like when they grow up? A nudist. And plus its inappropriate for women to be naked.... men arn't showing anything sexual... women are. Now it may not seem fair, but its for the better...

[soakthisup]

This is really fucking stupid. Get a husband and go about your life, and stop pretending that you're an honorary minority because you have a pussy.

BTW... did you see all the spades lingering around pretending they're behind this 'cause'? They just want to see some white titties are rape.

[BoredAtHome44]

I totally supported her until she said "The bikini top in America is like the burka in the middle east"..... I like the movement, but jesus christ that was stupid

[Eddief79]

This is Great, I support Women being topless! BUT keep dreaming because Women will never reach the same high level of a Man.

[nixonpunk222]

that black chick is sooooooo hot

[cacique311]

to be honest and seriously about this, i think women breast are very pretty and beautiful so why cover them? it is not bad to see beautiful things... and also they deserve been treat same way as a men.

[artiebarnes]

I came.

[kenneth04123]

I agree

we need sexual equality

[joelkilgore]

Alright, point one is that either man or woman topless causes the opposite sex to lust, that said, so does seeing his or her legs, biceps, raes, facial features, etc...

I went to a topless beach in Italy once and after 15 minutes, there was so many ladies topless that I was embarassed to gawk. Yes gawk.

Our lusts are in the imagination. Where there is no room for imagination, the lust dies out.

The ladies are only asking for equal rights to be wrong.

[pizzba]

During the Civil Rights Movement the laws that denied black people equal rights were changed after they got arrested for breaking them. The same thing applies to the gender equality protests in C.A.: as long as you stay covered in tape the Christianist law won't change for a long time. In equal rights cities the law usually got changed by repeatedly breaking it—not by keeping nipples covered.

[CaptainGreen2008]

Three thumbs up !!!!

She is correct... if women were often seen topless, as often as men are, then the stigma would be lessened to the point where bare breast would not be instantly be associated with sexual behavior.

[hero92694able]

and now I have a crush on them

[imagineers0]

Because men will run red lights and into store fronts... or into kindergartens.

[kingcobra12899]

If the Topless law passes, all that will happen is men will have something to jerk off to in public. Hope they pass that law, will be a sight to see. Never need porn again. :)_

[Gamervidsman2000]

@kingcobra12899 Not like you're going to flop your dick out and start masturbating,,,

[icytazmanian]

@kingcobra12899: Do men jerk off in public when they see a bikini? Or legs? Or billboards with topless models and hidden nipples?

[07929295251]

bagarate americans

[Balli1937]

these people are worst than animal, animals are happy in a way they are created ,but they want themselves to be degraded more than animals.they are thankless people.

[MattSyTy]

She makes a very strong case. Traditional subjective thought about the human body needs to have it's legitimacy examined and adjusted for society as it is TODAY.

[theGspotfinders]

@MattSyTy Yeah, and society as it is today loves Titties!

[omlas6]

dawn women are stupid

[Jonnyiswhipped]

Lol this is ridiculous. Men and women are made differently, just deal with it. And they're saying you should be able to control your hormones and nipples aren't a big deal, then why are you covering them up? 3/4 of those people have tape or some stupid fake nipple thing overtop.

[shaneshaneist]

@Jonnyiswhipped Because in the place they are right now, it is illegal to bare all. That's the point of them being there, so they can change that law

[DobermansRock]

This group needs to co-ordinate for the next biker rally. Also the girl at 5:38 wins. Save the Ta Tas and support breast cancer research.

[killerhook07]

humans are strange

[onlythewise1]

someone said if im horney i should be able to wipe out his dick and rub one off, i said gross i might be eating.

[DomDaDJ]

but women need bras to support they breasts so it's firm and good looking .......only takes off whenever they feel like it

[hellofresbee]

lost

[hbadalyan]

the black girl at 5:38... damn you got some nice tits!

[onlythewise1]

@hbadalyan ya she does

[mithilag]

SO MUCH BULLSHIT.

This is NOT what woman's rights mean.

Do you really want men staring at your breasts the whole time, really, that's going to be how you feel like women have equal rights?

Not the fact that women get paid far less than men, that women have the least representation in government, etc etc

These dumb broads should just go around naked, let everyone go naked actually. Ban clothes!

[IAmMichaelMyers]

1. girl on the left is the only one who should be topless. The other one's probably wouldn't even get in trouble for being topless in public, people would probably just think they are men. Gross.

2. We have a lot more important things to worry about in the world than these trivial women's "rights"

Get your priorities straight you idiots.

[ulkord]

well you go ahead and take your bra off ! but dont expect men to not only look at your breasts then. because you are bitching about men not looking in your face. but if you really do that. expect men to not even notice your face. also you will see guys with boners everywhere

[baseballP25]

No one knows me so I'm gonna be honest... I thought her nips were hard at first then I realized they're pasties

[WildBuck007]

Holy bajeezus that chick with the silver hearts is SWEET !! 0_0

[onlythewise1]

why are they looked at as sexual object, i dont know, i think milk when i see them.

[lust4sig]

all we are say-ing...is give tits a chance....

gotta love free walking porn... ladies..if you thought guys were staring at you before..wait till the law changes then out come the cameras..you'll be all over the web

[misterbateman808]

even though she is really boring I do support her rights

[rapiercutsdeep]

well ok regardless of peoples views of mis lara terstenjak, gotopless and top free equality is a bloody good idea and nudity should not be sexualized but celabrated. Equality is important

[nitehunt3r]

Wow. Most women in America really ARE stupid! Who knew! xD

[LoveFilmAll]

chả thấy đẹp chut nào,nửa kín nửa hở đẹp và gợi tình hơn nhiều.

[david1234now]

It brings poverty, sickness, and cultural distortion/destruction at the levels even communists, capitalists and Nazis of the most ardent types, all combined, can only wish in their wildest dreams. If we bring the problems upon ourselves, changes in our species' identity will not by evolution. It's extinction. Yes, a small matter as going topless, yet carries implications beyond fairness in social life.

[david1234now]

Can one imagine a world where men no longer aroused by women making the world a safer place, more right for women? Homosexuality is the least to be concerned with. In such a world the concept women as distinct from men will be undefined. Sexual homogeneity brings not only equality, but also the inherent unpredictability to Earth.

[david1234now]

Sexuality is the sole means that enlivens or destroys a man's spirit, the absence of which makes him kill, and that makes him inhuman. The implication is tremendous, and while going topless important for some, yet trivial to others; prudent societies also weigh in cost versus benefit. So, it is not a matter of beauty or of principle of equality. It all comes down to the orthodoxy of stability, of need, and of surviving species as humans.

[david1234now]

The only thing that's natural about going topless for women is to promote such occurrences. Remember the last time when ideal, prohibition, gave way to practicality, the repeal of prohibition? This is wine, big thing to social creatures such as the male humans, but sex is another thing. It is the biggest thing one can fear from a man. Sexuality means more than lust and copulation. There will not be enough prison cells for this new concept of equality. Don't forget the price for a civilization.

[david1234now]

The other problem involve fundamentally the evolution of the human species by sexual selection, and there is nothing in natural selection that needs not sexuality, in the context of human society. This unorthodoxy shall always be restrained to practices in localities, only as a gesture an escape for those minorities seeking exoticism. It is experimental at best. Rapes happen due to the nature of male hostility and impulsive sexuality.

[david1234now]

So, women being topless or even naked has consequences for society beyond the concerns for the eye corners of the beholders or its dichotomy of beauty versus imprudence. I fear of two things were this right going topless to be allowed. One concerns sex crime rates, in addition to its opening to questions of revising laws concerning minors. How can they be protected? Sexual impulse of a male even as just a boy is tremendous. How to protect young girls? Would this right be a curse to them?

[david1234now]

And for its unorthodoxy it at best can only be exercised in the localities of public life. Now, it is my opinion that right going topless shall, of course, be constitutionally guaranteed. However, for its highly unorthodox demand of such a "minority" as the demanding crowds for the female sex, cities' codes and ordinances are enough to kill this right off the streets. Even for a democratic society like us, we sometimes trade in minority rights for social stability and orthodoxy. The status quo.

[david1234now]

A constitution, like for the U.S., is an after-the-fact solution to ruling power, an attempt to limit and regulate the use of such state/federal powers. Only part of this article definitively offers basic rights to the governed, such as the Bill of Rights. Clarification of such constitutional vagueness is to be left for the judiciary. Thus, right going topless in a big-picture sense, is not constitutionally guaranteed; it has to be argued in high court, the Supreme Court.

[david1234now]

Social science is only the offspring of such a progressive idea such as democracy, where what good or bad for whom and why are left to the policymakers. By principle of enclosure, any nation encircles its inhabitants geopolitically and ethnically with almost absolute ruling powers. In any case! The rule of the game is that a nation's rulers hold in hand the claim of right to rule over all, of the governed by force, though by consent in theory. Democracy or not.

[david1234now]

This gives life to the fact of a society triumphed with ruling power to the majority. Good or bad for any particular segments of the collective is, indeed, immaterial; this seems thoughtless and groundless politically. Yet, that is the rule of the social life in any civilization governed by any set of laws. Democracy, therefore, is not a social science/policy in the making; it is a fact of sustainable communal life amongst humans. Even more, rule of law asks for no one social member's opinion.

[david1234now]

Dictatorial rule is the sole means to maintain society by the rule of all without fairness; while democracy goes for compromise, for its political founders may be well aware of the nature of unanimity in human opinions with respect to what constitute fairness and for whom it is meant to be written, rendering unison an impossibility. Thus, such founders opts for feasibility and stability both politically and socially, hence the antagonistic roles between the majority and the minority.

[david1234now]

In one sense, this is a good thing with respect to identity survival of such societal bodies Issue arises more often inevitably when in reality, there is nothing unanimous in the human society, and that no matter how small a social constitution/group might be, orthodoxy shall either be willfully revered or be coerced upon the dissent members. In a human culture/society, there cannot be orthodoxy if there is no system in resemblance of a legal system, of law.

[david1234now]

Vì cuộc phỏng vấn diễn ra bằng tiếng Anh, xin góp ý vài câu bằng ngôn ngữ này: orthodoxy is the protectionist closure of what a social entity collectively decides that certain ideals and the proper conducts thereof be enforced and confirmed, & that its societal members be conforming to its wishes. This is the making of social fabric, a process by which norms are created to ensure the purity of its collective body by technical constitution as well as by unanimity. This is social conservatism.