Added: 3 years ago
From: crazynicktaxi
Views: 358,697
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (649)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Always thought the melody shift was pure genius.

  • it's great, but I think it's valid to dislike this if you like the final mix better. I actually do prefer the final mix, but this has some nice gems in it.

  • No 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, all good children go to heaven. Really nice version though!

  • damn was that George shredding, that's ill!

  • How many song in one song! What a tune, genious or what?!?

    

  • 17 peeps dont know dislike is for jb videos

  • and not a single buck was given that day

  • Comment removed

  • what a jam!

  • why's there the option of muting the audio?

  • Comment removed

  • Wow, I never heard this before!!! Good stuff, thanks.

  • George is the most under rate beatle. look at this fucking guitar work!!!

  • funny paper

  • Beatiful ♥

  • Cool version; not the one that I was looking for though!

  • hahahah cool ending XD i guess thats why the final version fades out.. jaja

  • whats with pauls face xD hes like ):o

  • Paul owns John, big time. Sucked in John you dumb dead cunt

  • @LordChoxy Is that necessary?

  • Beautiful ♥

  • I'm sure when Lennon heard this demo he saw the writing on the wall. He knew that Paul completely outclassed him.

  • It sounds to me as if Paul or John is playing the drums... It doesn't really sound like Ringo... It could be a rough mix with a few overdubs.

  • i think paul must be looking at a road sign in china at the begging of this clip

  • Qué buena canción. Me encanta el primer minuto.

  • George Harrison god !

  • Thank you. Great history. Not as good as what made it onto Abbey Road, but great history, and I thank you. Shows what George Martin (producer) and Geoff Emerick (sound engineer) did for the band.

  • 15 people don't know how to work a mouse

  • who's playing the keys on this cut!?

  • @the1nkwell billy preston

  • @diazpepe figured!! thanks!!

  • wow, never heard this version before!

  • Mmmm, I agree. Sounds like a fake.

  • @Jacey1969 I'm guessing you haven't listened to a lot of Beatles bootlegs.

  • FAKE

  • @totaldrambeatles22

    Ever heard of "The Lost Lennon Tapes" radio series? There is nothing fake about this.

    It was played on the program around 1988.

  • @SuperBeherenow the gutair is buried at 3:09 to the end and the single tracked vocals are not believable

  • @totaldrambeatles22

    Have a nice day.

  • 14 people who disliked this masterpiece are total tasteless idiots who's not even worthy listening to this GEM!!!!!

  • The version on the B side of Abbey Road is superb. This is just sloppy noodling.

  • i think it's a great song ..oh , that magic feeling , no where to go !!!

  • love the 12 bar blues at the end

  • i used to have a lot of beatle bootlegs,including this one ....you are lucky to have it

  • this is a great song.lyrics about a marrige breakdown and a money grabbing BITCH!! lol.just my opinion nothing i,ve read.

  • @MrMGD92 I think it was more about the breakdown of the childhood friends business partners The Beatles themselves, contracts, lawsuits. George Harrison said that Apple Records was handled like a joke. There was so much money they had one large account, and if anybody needed money they just took it. Then all of a sudden it's like wait I want a buyout. Paul McCartney had the same trouble because he doesn't believe in prenuptials. This was the B-Side of their last album.

  • @drasticwillb Yes i,ve heard that I was joking about with the Money grabbing ........ but I think it was this year they brought in an acountant.

  • There is 13 dislikes.. Are they Music Retarded?!

  • Mañana lo hare peor... lo prometo!

  • Who the fuck could dislike this song?! For that matter. Who the fuck could dislike any Beatles song? They made fucken music you son's of bitches! Beatles are equivalent to God in music! Beatles4Ever!!! <3

  • @Space9Man well, i agree on you with the disliking this song part, but some of the songs are a little scary, and this is coming from a kid who grew up on the beetles, always disliking that justin bier crap

  • @Space9Man fuck yeah the beatles and led zeppelin are the the two best bands ever period.

  • @Space9Man 1,171 likes 16 dis. That's less than .01%  that are not with it Id take those odds any day.

  • @Space9Man I don't Honey Pie has always irked me :D

  • @Space9Man

    Who could dislike the song? Someone who didn't enjoy the tune maybe? Don't they have that right?

  • @Space9Man don't ever compare the beatles to god. I mean, he is good, but they are the fuckin beatles.

  • @Space9Man I have one request.....if you love, not like, love the Beatles, could we please show some respect? dude, I mean no disrespect but, a class group, in fact the classiest group, deserves respect.........please understand, I'm not trying to diss you but, please show respect to the gawds........hope I didn't offend you

  • @Space9Man ok, admitted, I'm older, I'm 56, first concert I ever saw was the last the Beatles last concert, I was there sept. '66 I was there, not just an ass but an ass w/a history, could we lighten up on the "F" word, we are Beatle freaks, we know music better than others, we respect music more than most....all I'm saying is :us Beatle freaks have class, can you just lighten up on the "F" word

  • @sirwob I think John would have taken your disgust of an "F" werd to mean you are a-sexual. All censorship is the wrong. Maybe you can relate to this comparison,,, the forced cover up of the female breast, can cause those that have never seen one in person to go ape over their new discovery, possibly to the extreme of rape.

    "Bad words" are like great breasts.

  • @SlackerSlayer I understand your point, I''m not offended by the word fuck, just seemed like there are better (classier) ways to describe the most brilliant band in recorded history

  • @sirwob In the 1960's us third graders were using it.

    It is just another 'thing' those that live their lives in some unreal ideal of this planet think is best.

    I apologize if my a-sexual remark offended you. It was used 'as if the person never left the house' could be offended with a word. The word is used and for good reasons some times.

  • @sirwob What's wrong with the word fuck? I mean The Beatles used to swear a lot especially in saying fuck?

  • 3:03 Mark in this Video, sounds like Robert Plant said to himself, "this is what I want to sound like".

  • Just can't stand to hear Beatles songs with out the bad ass bass lines.

  • Oh, Sir Paul McCartney, take me away with your amazing voice, siiigh <3

  • This song is the most sincere form of love to be able to put into music. RIP to the best band of all time. RIP Georgie Porgie and John Lemon. X)

  • Never heard this version before. I prefer the album one but this was a lovely surprise, great to hear session version/jams.. Beatles shaped my life, bless them all. Cant think of a Beatle song thats not right up there. Your day breaks....

  • Martin probably made the right choice with this. The end wasn't very coherent at all, and sounded of a much lesser band.

  • I love this song. I like the version here. The "ooooh" is better on this one. it sounds cooler i think.

  • @tomorrowneverknows94 I don't understand how people can think this was a rehearsal.

    This is the real deal (Take 30) which was overdubbed to the official version. And I think Paul's "oooooh" is simply to mark time for the overdubbed chorus. Love hearing the raw basic tracks though.

  • Oh that magic feeling, nowhere to go...

  • This is by FAR my favorite Beatles song! I was raised on the Beatles in the '70s, but never heard "Abbey Road" or "Let it Be" til the '80s. I only had their albums up to "SGT Pepper" when I was a kid. Thanks Jon, after numerous bong hits, for showing me the rest of the Beatles, and how the saga ended! Thank you too, crazynicktaxi for posting! You are AWESOME!!!

  • @x101st hahahha :)

  • What an incredible medley of songs to play out the last and (in my opinion) best Beatles album. This was an awareness that they were about to split up for good and they wanted to pour every last drop of their collective talent into this album. I feel so sad and so happy at the same time when I hear these songs. No other band has ever been able to make me feel that way.

  • 3:15 - 4:46 Blows my mind every time. Shame they cut out so much from the released version.

  • @DoctorPencilK whos playing that solo? george or john?

  • I'm pretty sure it's George, but I can't guarantee it.

  • Thumbs up if you know Bob Dylan got the Beatles to smoke their first joint!

    (learned that in music college LOL)

  • 3 different voices... holy poop i love paul!!!!

  • One two three four five six seven. All good children eat unleavened. At least on Passover they eat unleavened bread.

  • Classic. Could never figure whom played lead. The high B and E notes on the 12/13th frets are signature George Harrison, but this lead on this tune sounds like the major blues pentatonic with alot of E, G and A notes which is signature Paul McCartney. Anyone know who played this lead?

  • @SOLISDEUS george was really the guitar player in the band. he never got the credit he deserved. rip george--you will always be my fav beatle.

  • @SOLISDEUS if pauls on piano, and i think he is, then its george

  • @SOLISDEUS The whole tune sounds to me like Paul played all the instruments to show the others how it goes... Even though the end jam sounds more like a group effort. Who knows.

  • @ClueBand I agree. McCartney liked making acetates to show the others how the song played out.  No easy task and very time consuming. Maybe Lennon on his Epiphone Casino taking lead on the jam. Doesn't sound like George's style.

  • Comment removed

  • It´s fantastic to be able to hear a rehersal of You never give me your money. This song is one of the best It´s about a financial crisis they had, it describes the confusion of numbers, lack of money etc they had at a certain period. If tou take the orignal try to see the relationship between the lyrics and movements of the melody. It´s amazing. 4 geniuses, but Paul MCcartney was and is the most talented one with all respect and veneration to the other 3. Tx.

  • @musicseverything

    Agreed :D

  • Often one of my favorite Beatles songs, which of course means it's often one of my favorite songs of all time. Captures the zeitgeist of the early 70s for me perfectly...despite the facts that it was released in 1969 (I think) and I wasn't born until 1972...

  • derp....lol

    and once again there are 10 deaf people listening apparently.

  • @spacemanjoeb yes, they are deaf or they probably hve pressed the negative button by mistake since this song is one of The Beatles masterpieces.

  • derp....lol

    

  • I've always wondered how this song originally ended. I think they knew they were beyond the point of what they were going to keep and just let it melt down into a jam session. I'll bet they could improvise live better than any band out there; they just never did it.

  • Guys, guys..... The Beatles pretty much invented the "concept album" with Sgt. Pepper, and Paul thought that one of the ways to tie a pop album together and give it the feeling that the album was more than a collection of singles packed together for a cheap Xmas present was to have a reprise near the end of the album. The reprise doesn't have to invoke the first cut on the album, just a previous one. And every McCartney album I'm aware of since the breakup has included this.

  • my favorite beatles song.

  • Es Parte del tema Boy Your Gona Carry That Weyg

  • This song is amazing.

  • Great extended version! But I do miss the "1234567 all good children go to heaven"

  • I just don´t have that much jam.....as them

  • that's why i like the B side of Abbey Road, because one song is the continuation of the other one. :)

    but the whole album is a master piece, my personal favorite ♥

  • Was anyone on bass this time round, if not, it that why it sounds endearingly odd to me?

  • But Oh that magic feeling!...Nowhere to go.

  • This is a great song. I have a vinyl copy of "Abbey Road" and it sounds great, but the 6 minute version is better.

  • Why does this song sound so much like "Carry That Weight"

  • @auttisticcoww

    cause Carry That Weight is a reprise of that one....

  • @crazynicktaxi No, it's beacuse this is one of about eight or so songs on the Abbey Road medley. So, all of the songs sound sort of the same especially the ones tha tuse the same instruments.

  • @sgtpepper19671 so i hope that answers your question auttisticcoww

  • @crazynicktaxi You're a bloody genius. A band, doing a reprise of the opening track in the mix near the end(literally :3)? Unheard of. Don't have any idea how you would have came to that conclusion on your own. It's not like that was a common occurrence in the 60's-70's AT ALL or anything! I could give examples, but I'm too lazy. Pink Floyd dunnit a couple 'a times I think, but that's just off the top of my head. Nice video among other things. Thanks for sharing the bootleg. :P

  • @crazynicktaxi yeaa... every beatles fan knows that...

  • @crazynicktaxi Oh. Thank you.

  • @crazynicktaxi * contains a reprise

  • @auttisticcoww

    because they were the beatles, and they could'nt do easy things....they invented genially this reprise

  • @auttisticcoww Because its in the reprise

  • @auttisticcoww i am not a beatles expert--but i heard that they had a bunch of songs with no beginning or no end and they put this together as a compilation--it worked out good--dont ya think?

  • Comment removed

  • @auttisticcoww Because almost all the songs of the B side of the album are composed on the same pattern of keys. It is a suite.

  • @auttisticcoww cause its all supose to go together, they wanted it all to be one big song but it ended up n like 6 sagments

  • Underrated song.

  • @Benkenobi8118 Still awesome.

  • @Benkenobi8118 Nothing about the Beatles is underrated. EVERYONE considers them the greatest band to ever grace modern music.

  • @IElrekkaI

    Yes, but how many regard "you never give me your Money" as one of their best songs?

  • @Benkenobi8118 Probably a lot :v

  • @Benkenobi8118 your comment is the understatement of the century :3

  • great piece of Beatles history here. and the Happy Organ homage near the end; i love it!

  • thank you so very much

  • cool alternate version ;D.

  • Comment removed

  • awesome song!

  • Bach, Beethoven, Beatles!

  • epic.

    simple as that

  • This jam session is simply fabulous!!

  • Great post crazynicktaxi ♪.. agree, this take is just before mixing... a lot of whole takes/versions were left as ' a 1 minute or some' sample of the whole version... got to be this way or it was going to be 'the White Album No 2"!

    @ nitroplex : I think - not for sure - George play bass here... that fender VI... the same bass you see John playing Let it be...

    Peace ♪

  • "one, two, three, four, five, seven all good children go to heaven.."

  • nice

  • Interesting to hear what I seem is the original track before GM did his post production jiggery pokery magic

  • @crazynicktaxi Thanks buddy, nice job.

  • number=joint funny parers=lsd on tabs of paper

  • @Deangulos I thought paper was like a check, makes more sence

  • @Deangulos hmm, I always thought this "funny paper" bit was about the Beatles money being tied up in accounts, specifically the mess of Apple and Allen Klein's attempts to straighten out the finances (while lining his own pockets). The funny papers are statements of assets and amounts owed, rather than the actual cash, which is all the boys wanted.

  • ok, I honestly in my "heart of hearts" that nobody knows the Beatles better than me, holy crap this is hot, ty crazynick

  • 3:03 Oscar Eckenstein

  • 3:03 Oscar Eckenstein ton 40

  • Nunca me entregues todos tu duinero ni tus cosas burguesas

    Nunca confies en u7n tipo como yo

    podr{ias llevarte m{as de una sorpresa

    la gente como yo

    es de dudosa procedencia...

  • gosh, i enjoy this version even more, especially the little mistakes, much more personal than the final mix, even though that one is a phenomenal song itself, am I alone on this one?

  • @JonnoThomas Not hardly.

  • 1. May 6, 1969(AR Session#9): 36 Takes. This is Take 30 - basic track

    2. July 1, 1969(AR Session#10): Emi mixes SI and vocals onto (1)

    3. July 11, 1969(AR Session#18): Emi mixes Paul's Bass onto (2)

    4. July 15, 1969(AR Session#19): Emi mixes Back vocals, SI, Chimes onto (3)

    5. July 30, 1969(AR Session#30): Emi mixes more SI/Vocals onto (4)

    6. July 31, 1969(AR Session#31): Emi mixes more SI/Vocals onto (5)

    7. Aug 5, 1969(AR Session#35): Emi mixes cross fades onto (6) --> final

  • Wow - Never heard this before. Thank you VERY VERY much for posting this!!!!!

    This is definitely the real deal (May 6, 1969, Take 30) which was overdubbed with SI to the final product. This shows what mixing can do for a track.

    The Beatles were GREAT, but Martin & Emerick made them BRILLIANT!

  • Same guitar from Badge

  • One thing I missed with this version is the "One two three four five six seven, all good children go to heaven."

  • @nyshortline Added in later takes

  • @nyshortline Well don't miss it. Sing It ! Cuz there's even more fun in the singin' than there is in the listening.

    All together now, One two three four five six seven, All Good Children Go To Heaven !

  • @ng21644605 LOL!! Now if I was any good at singing maybe I would!!!

  • Tentei tocar aqui no violão. Ficou "ok", mas o solo não consegui fazer minimamente parecido e, nhé, é melhor só ouvir a música.

  • Where did you get this from??

  • This is indescribably sick

  • Outtake or later McCartney doodling? Does anyone definitively know? If it's an outtake, it's pretty clear that early on they realized that it wasn't going anywhere--the band isn't tight at all, the beginning of the guitar solo is sloppy, and overall McCartney's vocals are far inferior to the finished product--so they just said let's mess around and see what we get (which would be an explanation for some of the ridiculously tasteless piano fills and the lame boogie woogie ending).

  • @Galantski this took a lot of days.... they rehearsed it lots of times to get the basic track (sorry for my bad english) you can notice there's no bass because Paul is on piano and etc. John can't play the solo. This song was mixed in two parts... you can hear the difference between 2:00 and 3:00

  • @AdrianRojasF -- Yeah, I can believe that. The amount of production that went into it was incredible.

  • @Galantski Yeah, but first they needed a complete demo .. as a guide... Ringo used hearphones in Come Together to hear an early take (the one from Anthology)

  • @Galantski

    Come on now, 'lame boogie woogie ending'? This is such a cool clip of these guys just having some fun playing music together at a time when they needed it most as a band. For shame.

  • @georgethoro -- I guess we're looking at it from different angles. I was contrasting it with the finished product and you were taking it as a stress release; both are valid views.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • The greatest, head and shoulders above the rest.

  • long live Paul

  • why they didn't put this on the album???? It is soo good!!!!!