I sighed at 1:50 and yet it was pot luck, anything as low as 30k or even 120k before first head gasket failure. But you would have thought by the late nineties they would have realised there was a problem and used a proper gasket? After BMW ownership the pheonix four should have focused on replacement cars for their range instead of sports cars (MG SV), although the MG Z's are under-rated in my view as long as you opt for diesel, v6 (ish) or v8, 10 years too late to save them though
@Liamautomechanic I'm not saying they are bad cars by any means and yes the gasket fix does seem to work, there's no denying it. It's just a shame they never came out of the factory with a decent gasket. Interestingly MG are using what is essentially a 1.8 turbo k series, and the 6 drives alot like a ZT. Re-engineered technology perhaps
@gunnit1001 The first rover gaskit i fitted was on the rover 400 k series cleaned r well down. skimmed the head tightened r well down. never looked back. the new tin gaskit is a good job. grand wee motor.nice to drive.
What a concept, a company on the verge of collapse that decides to implement unproven technology to cut quality and costs. It was like they learned NOTHING from Honda.
The head gaskets mainly went on the 1.8 models due to the bigger capacity aqnd the cylinders were close to the water jackets but the 1.1 , 1.4 and 1.6 were all fine.
@JACQUES330 I wish my 1.6 K engine had of listened to you say this. Then I'd still have my 416 instead of selling it to a wrecker for £90 - the only way I could rid of that piece of shit after it died so dramatically.
K-series head gaskets contributed to the failure of the company. Instead of waffling he (they) should have put a value on the technical risk. He (they)didn't.
@engineroomapocalypse My teacher is an ex rover engineer and worked on the K-series project and he says it's not the gasket design, he said it's when BMW bought Rover and they had to make the engines bigger to a 1.6/1.8 by changing to damp liners, the original k-series used in the wedge cars had wet liners and were very reliable, ARG had Maestros and Montegos going around for testing and not one had head gasket failure or any other type of failure, the problems started 1996.
My Dad used to own a 414 which had covered 145,000 miles and was on its original headgasket when he sold it. Also faster and more efficient than any rival.
I had a 1.8 k series Freelander and it was a god damned shocking engine on that car. The headgasket failed nearly every year, and two of the bolts actually stretched too much, which meant that in turn the engine came apart whilst driving.
Shocking engine in the FL, sounds like its a gooden in the smaller cars though?
i fitted a fair few of the modified tin gaskit. seems to have cured the problem. none have blown since.grand wee car to drive. good video by the way.
Liamautomechanic 6 months ago
I sighed at 1:50 and yet it was pot luck, anything as low as 30k or even 120k before first head gasket failure. But you would have thought by the late nineties they would have realised there was a problem and used a proper gasket? After BMW ownership the pheonix four should have focused on replacement cars for their range instead of sports cars (MG SV), although the MG Z's are under-rated in my view as long as you opt for diesel, v6 (ish) or v8, 10 years too late to save them though
gunnit1001 7 months ago
@gunnit1001 they were a great car to drive.
Liamautomechanic 6 months ago
@Liamautomechanic I'm not saying they are bad cars by any means and yes the gasket fix does seem to work, there's no denying it. It's just a shame they never came out of the factory with a decent gasket. Interestingly MG are using what is essentially a 1.8 turbo k series, and the 6 drives alot like a ZT. Re-engineered technology perhaps
gunnit1001 5 months ago
@gunnit1001 The first rover gaskit i fitted was on the rover 400 k series cleaned r well down. skimmed the head tightened r well down. never looked back. the new tin gaskit is a good job. grand wee motor.nice to drive.
Liamautomechanic 5 months ago
What a concept, a company on the verge of collapse that decides to implement unproven technology to cut quality and costs. It was like they learned NOTHING from Honda.
PUREAAMERICAN 8 months ago
Unless that man with a beard designs engines. Shit engine. He was wrong.
mushroomscouser 11 months ago
i had a k series in a rover 216...head gasket death at 55,000...what a shit car!!!
chrisrkelly61 11 months ago
The head gaskets mainly went on the 1.8 models due to the bigger capacity aqnd the cylinders were close to the water jackets but the 1.1 , 1.4 and 1.6 were all fine.
JACQUES330 1 year ago
@JACQUES330 I wish my 1.6 K engine had of listened to you say this. Then I'd still have my 416 instead of selling it to a wrecker for £90 - the only way I could rid of that piece of shit after it died so dramatically.
Aussiemarco 1 year ago
@Aussiemarco they were a good car to drive, plenty of power for a 1.6 engine.apart from the originally dodgy gaskit.
Liamautomechanic 5 months ago
The guy with a beard is an absolute twat
Furthermore, he was wrong.
K-series head gaskets contributed to the failure of the company. Instead of waffling he (they) should have put a value on the technical risk. He (they)didn't.
He didn't. The rest, as they say, is history....
mushroomscouser 1 year ago
and that is a mono brow! lol
benbmx1000 1 year ago
50k miles, headgasket time!
L1CKMYBA11Z 1 year ago 2
@L1CKMYBA11Z Mine was 75k
JACQUES330 1 year ago
Shame they couldnt similate out Head-gasket and inlet manifold gasket failures
engineroomapocalypse 1 year ago
@engineroomapocalypse My teacher is an ex rover engineer and worked on the K-series project and he says it's not the gasket design, he said it's when BMW bought Rover and they had to make the engines bigger to a 1.6/1.8 by changing to damp liners, the original k-series used in the wedge cars had wet liners and were very reliable, ARG had Maestros and Montegos going around for testing and not one had head gasket failure or any other type of failure, the problems started 1996.
hamster639 11 months ago
the money spent developing this could have been used in adding engine mounts to achieve the same results, yet not compromising engine longevity
they should have K.I.S.S. more
authmaax 1 year ago
effectively bends,is that the head gasket hes talking about lol
tolsonryan 1 year ago
Buen video, mis felicitaciones, muy muy bueno
MakINE16V 1 year ago
My Dad used to own a 414 which had covered 145,000 miles and was on its original headgasket when he sold it. Also faster and more efficient than any rival.
morgman43 2 years ago
we had a 214 k series it would beat most cars from the lights
zincdustdust 2 years ago
I had a 1.8 k series Freelander and it was a god damned shocking engine on that car. The headgasket failed nearly every year, and two of the bolts actually stretched too much, which meant that in turn the engine came apart whilst driving.
Shocking engine in the FL, sounds like its a gooden in the smaller cars though?
jamesysam002 2 years ago
got a 1996 metro, k series 1.1l. Awesome engine, low maitainance and starts every time no problems!
djmonsta200883 2 years ago
if you never did this! rover would still be here! dikwads! i got a rover brilliant car, brill engine, shit idea ! for long headbolts
adamnshane 2 years ago
You can always trust a man with a beard and a woman with a posh English accent.
jsj24uk 2 years ago 8
FANTASTIC VIDEO!
i have got a rover 25 1.4k series, and i love this engine!!
danziga88 3 years ago
nice :)) keep going :) i'm waiting part 3 ;)
djmoner 3 years ago
That's all there is, I'm afraid.
rovamota 3 years ago
There was only two parts.
rovamota 2 years ago