To get a speed of 480 mph was in a dive called the 9 G Pull. A force of about 9 G's was experienced during the dive. Some pilots didn't make it out because of blacking out during the dive. Would have interesting to see how well these planes would have done in combat. But by 1938 types like the Me109 and A5M were common so I don't think they would have held up for too long.
The cartridge shown here is used in what is known as a Kaufmann starter. It was used to dramatic effect by James Steward in the film Flight Of The Phoenix. The device was also used on some larger agricultural tractors too. Firing the Kaufmann into one cylinder would swing the engine enough to bring the other cylinders in on normal fuel...Hopefully.
Oh! I flew to the past... California and Miami were nice places... No junkies or vatos. If you wanted a big city, NY or Chicago were a place to be. Nice and real girls (no palstic boobs or lips)... Fly was a daredevil stick and rudder ol' prop job...
Now THAT'S flying! Keep your F-18's and F-22's, if you can't open the cockpit canopy and fly with the blast and heat of the engine in your face, then it ain't flyin'!
im was wondering, on the last photo or drawing/painting whatever, is that a belgian version? i was wondering because of the colors on the propeller are ones from the belgian flag
@ninetalis It's just how some of them had the tips of their props back then. Like today they're just a solid black or yellow. It's just to show people where not to step when the plane's running. :)
Yes, those black powder cartridges put out a lot of gas. The F4 Phantom could use a five lb black powder canister for start ups if there was no wolverine to pump air through the engine. It was for emergency conditions, of course.
What an informative look at this aircraft, of which I knew next to nothing.
Do I see a few stylistic features shared with the F4F? Those through-and-through wheel wells look familiar, as does the arrangement of undercarriage generally. I notice the fuselage underside appears much 'squarer' in form than the mid-winged Wildcat... I love seeing such 'evolutionary' features! Fun.
the Funny thing is, the Swedish built a jet, the J29 and called it "Tunnan" wich means barrell.^^ And it was called the flying barrell too. Strange coincidence, no? Or as Gibbs would say, there is no coincidence!^^
So are all the little "title" screens, like when it says "Literally giving her the gun", actually part of the old footage, or is it just made to look like it's out of an old movie? It's pretty well done, but some of the text doesn't look old at all, so I have to wonder. Obviously the FOOTAGE is real, but I can't tell whether it's an old silent movie, or if it's just a "fake" one.
@mongorians22 When it says "480" it's referring to the dive he just made..."and the wings stay on!" That was pretty good back then, to make a dive that fast and not shed your wings. Like you said, 480 is very fast for a biplane. But speed records are for LEVEL speed, how fast you can go on engine power alone. The P-38 had a max speed of like 400mph, but it could almost go supersonic in a dive. Early jet fighters could break Mach 1 in a shallow dive, but not in level flight, etc.
Is there anyone who can explain to me how the heck a cartridge starter WORKS? I mean, beyond "you put the cartridge in the slot and fire it and it spins the engine...."
I mean, does it work sort of like an inertia starter, only it uses the blast to spin up the flywheel before in engages the clutch? Even just a hint or something would be great.
@justforever96 When the cartridge is fired, the expanding gasses push down a piston in a small cylinder. At the bottom of the piston is a rack which connects to a cog in line with the crankshaft so the latter is set in motion and hopefully, if properly primed etc. the engine fires.
@spitfireJEJ Thanks; I think I've figured out the theory, but it still annoys me a bit that I can't find any actual diagrams of a Coffman starter, or any videos of one being used (besides the scene in The Flight of The Phoenix, which I don't think is very accurate). If the engine started right up, it'd be fine, but considering how long they have to crank old engines to start them at air shows, it's hard to imagine; a cartridge can't last very long. But better than hand-cranking like the Bf 109!
well, navies around the world thought that biplanes were needed to get off and on carriers. Brits used them well into WWII, helping to sink the Bismark and the Italian battle fleet.
@jakefree25 which was fortunate as the Bismark's anti aircraft guns were designed to shoot times planes flying at 300mph or above. They couldn't be calibrated for a plane flying as slow as the swordfish (98mph) and was defeated by the obsolescence of these planes.
@binaway The issue of Bismarck's poor AA gunnery has to be seen in context. Prior to the London Naval Treaty ships, NO capital ship had effective AA capacity; even then it wasn't until AA radar and VT fuses arrived that naval AA became a true counter to massed air attacks. All the old AA cruiser conversions demonstrate this, as does PoW's poor showing against massed G3Ms in 1941. Before 1944, the only effective AA defence at sea was a fighter CAP.
These were in a couple movies made before the US got into WW2, including "Dive Bomber" from 1941. The F4F replaced it just before the US got into the war
This is one of my favorite pre-war US planes--I have several books and plans for it. The F3F never saw combat in WW2. Its top speed was 250mph, while a Zero was 340mph. Would never have been used as a frontline fighter in WW2, as even the later F2A Buffalo was outclassed as a fighter. The SBD (Slow-But-Deadly nickname) Dauntless dive bomber was 250mph, so aviation progress simply surpassed this cute little biplane fighter by 1940. Still an important ancestor to the F4F and F6F USN fighters.
Actually Yes! it did fight the Zero, as the single winf F4F & F6F, both outgrowths of the F3F...& you all know what happenned...less manoeuvrable than the zero perhaps, but faster & much much tougher!!!
the shotgun shell is a blank, this was used to start the motor, the blast would get the prop spinning & hopefully the motor would fire. shotgun shell starters were common in the prop planes.
Beg to differ: this was a lovely 'plane...'crank-up' landing gear, but just charming. Yeah: I suppose it was a bit 'Polikarpov-esque', in certain ways. But the I-16 was basically a copy of the speed-winning planes of a couple of years prior.
Straight and level it does 175/180 mph just cruising. It's a pretty speedy little airplane." When asked how maneuverable they are, he replied "... they do good loops and things but the ailerons are not very effective like you think they would be. It's actually kind of sluggish with a low roll rate
Hinton, "... the thing accelerates real fast on take-off. When you push the throttle up you use 35 inches ... which is like 800 hp. The airplane rolls only a short distance before it breaks ground, so there's not a problem with directional control. The climb angle is real good. You don't have to run the engine very hard. It'll climb a couple of thousand foot a minute at 120 mph.
The Air Museum Planes of Fame president, Steve Hinton, still flies the planes, described them as "... really good airplanes, well built." The three examples are basically stock. The instrumentation has been changed and modern brakes added, and manual gear retraction system is still in place,electric system can also be used.
It never fired a shot in anger, but it trained many flyers. State of the art as far a biplanes went. Would have loved to have seen one go up against an Italian CR 42.
if the gloster gladiator could do it,the f3f could.the gladiator even had kills against the macchi monoplanes.the f3f would've been good against japanese perrys and fixed gear monoplane nates
Kind of nhard to think that only 5 years seperate the F3F from the F4F. Early F4F was also a bipe. this would be a cool plane to have. many WWII Navy & Marine pilots flew this in advanced training so it was an important aircraft.
480 mph? Who were they trying to kid? And who on earth thought it was a good idea to retract the u/c with all the other drag of a bipe? ;-) It's a KOFFMAN starter by the way. Used a special BLANK shotgun cartridge to ignite the mixture and get the motor running. Similar sort of effort used on some early jets.
Come on, they saved a lot of power by retracting the gear. It was a neat mechanism, too...when I was a kid I had an F3F-3 model with authentic working landing gear. Wish I still had it.
Ah, hello.. Just researching some, as I picked up a 'Special Hobby' 1/72 F3F-3 kit for the Christmas competiton.. I now have a month to build it.. It's a nice kit to look at, with resin and etched brass.. but Im don't know what it's like to build yet.. :) :)
Smiert.. Neither do I.. but it's things like the cockpit floor, and sides, which otherwise isn't included.. and it'll be easier to do the resin once it's sawn and cut off it's mould, than to scratchbuild with plastic card.. Not that I know why they did such a detailed cockpiot anyway, they provided a closed canopy.. :P The build will be as tricky as I make it.. :) It'll need some rigging, but I haven't yet found a decent picture to use, to see how the rigging goes.. :)
I did the F3F in 1/32, it was extremely tricky to build: the propeller was connected with the undercarriage (done by Zahnräder - do not know the english word for it), so when you turn it, the undercarriage will go up/down, never saw this kind of mechansm again.
I did the F3F in 1/32, it was extremely tricky to build: the propeller was connected with the undercarriage (done by Zahnräder - do not know the english word for it), so when you turn it, the undercarriage will go up/down, never saw this kind of mechansm again.
@yyk99 It is the starter, I believe it was called a Coffman Cartridge. The thing probably burns fairly slowly, but it does appear to be a shot gun shell, so maybe since they were fairly common perhaps was used without the shot They made self starters mandatory back in the day for the Indy 500/ Harry Miller was the Penske of his day, more so actually. He dicided to forgoe the standard fare of a battery and starter and used a similar system to the Coffman, which met the spirit of the rules.
My dad was a Navy airplane mechanic in the late 30's. He worked on a lot of F3F's, and we still have some photos of his squadron's F3F-3's. Dad was with Fighting 3, which used the "Felix the Cat" logo. (Earlier Felix had belonged to another squadron--VF-6, I think--but the logo went to VF-3 after some kind of reorganization.)
To get a speed of 480 mph was in a dive called the 9 G Pull. A force of about 9 G's was experienced during the dive. Some pilots didn't make it out because of blacking out during the dive. Would have interesting to see how well these planes would have done in combat. But by 1938 types like the Me109 and A5M were common so I don't think they would have held up for too long.
Gasbaggful 1 month ago
Those cartridge starters were how the engine of the rebuilt airplane in Flight of the Phoenix was started. First time I'd ever seen them in use.
carmium 5 months ago
480 mph for a bi-plane! wow.
ChorltonBrook 8 months ago
@ChorltonBrook That 480mph was probably in a DIVE!?!
YTM021807 7 months ago
@YTM021807 Without a doubt. Like the video said though, impressive the wings stayed on! That's a lot of drag to pull forward at 480mph!
JaleelJohanson62 5 months ago
The cartridge shown here is used in what is known as a Kaufmann starter. It was used to dramatic effect by James Steward in the film Flight Of The Phoenix. The device was also used on some larger agricultural tractors too. Firing the Kaufmann into one cylinder would swing the engine enough to bring the other cylinders in on normal fuel...Hopefully.
crankbv1 9 months ago
@crankbv1 Just for the sake of precision... "Coffman starter", not Kaufmann ;o) Cheers!
Elhombresombra 4 months ago
@Elhombresombra l stand corrected,sir. You're right of course,Coffman is the correct name. lt must be early senility creeping in. Cheers.
crankbv1 4 months ago
@crankbv1 you don't need to be so tough with yourself! :-P Cheers! :o)
Elhombresombra 4 months ago
Beautiful Old ship...Great Post!!
Greenhornet270 11 months ago
Among other things, Grumman fighters had a very clear DNA.
dorkf1sh 1 year ago
The music reminds me of old Tom and Jerry cartoons.
300ZXrider1 1 year ago
Oh! I flew to the past... California and Miami were nice places... No junkies or vatos. If you wanted a big city, NY or Chicago were a place to be. Nice and real girls (no palstic boobs or lips)... Fly was a daredevil stick and rudder ol' prop job...
Cavelson 1 year ago
BomberGuy...thanks for this great clip and the music was perfect
2c1496 1 year ago
Now THAT'S flying! Keep your F-18's and F-22's, if you can't open the cockpit canopy and fly with the blast and heat of the engine in your face, then it ain't flyin'!
CaesarInVa 1 year ago
@yyk99: It's known as a Coffman Starter.
SSGDragonSoldier 1 year ago
The Japanese called the F-4-F the "Beer Bottle" It was just an F-3-F with one less wing.
killingamps 1 year ago
In "Flight of the Phoenix" you'll see a Coffman Starter used..
SSGDragonSoldier 1 year ago
im was wondering, on the last photo or drawing/painting whatever, is that a belgian version? i was wondering because of the colors on the propeller are ones from the belgian flag
ninetalis 1 year ago
@ninetalis It's just how some of them had the tips of their props back then. Like today they're just a solid black or yellow. It's just to show people where not to step when the plane's running. :)
ManofWonder82 1 year ago
@ManofWonder82
Just wondering, because i heard that belgium did had some, but i wasnt sure
ninetalis 1 year ago
@ninetalis I know the Dutch had some in Indonesia. So it could very well be the Belgians had them too:)
evildeathmonkey1 1 year ago
@evildeathmonkey1
Ive seen a book today about the aviation of belgium, and they had some in the regions of the pacific
ninetalis 1 year ago
Beautiful. I love this plane..
nagant1934 1 year ago
Thanks for posting this.
Yes, those black powder cartridges put out a lot of gas. The F4 Phantom could use a five lb black powder canister for start ups if there was no wolverine to pump air through the engine. It was for emergency conditions, of course.
macnutz 1 year ago
Очень хорошая хроника!А песня вообще великолепная!*****
Bruno47602 1 year ago
Now THAT is classy!!
mulletcar 1 year ago
What an informative look at this aircraft, of which I knew next to nothing.
Do I see a few stylistic features shared with the F4F? Those through-and-through wheel wells look familiar, as does the arrangement of undercarriage generally. I notice the fuselage underside appears much 'squarer' in form than the mid-winged Wildcat... I love seeing such 'evolutionary' features! Fun.
KrillLiberator 1 year ago
thanks for sharing these great videos
aircarguy1 1 year ago
If you are a buff of F3'F-2's then you would like the 1940 Robert Taylor movie "Flight Command" a melodrama of Navy Aviators flying them.
verbusen 1 year ago
the Funny thing is, the Swedish built a jet, the J29 and called it "Tunnan" wich means barrell.^^ And it was called the flying barrell too. Strange coincidence, no? Or as Gibbs would say, there is no coincidence!^^
LupusAries 1 year ago
So are all the little "title" screens, like when it says "Literally giving her the gun", actually part of the old footage, or is it just made to look like it's out of an old movie? It's pretty well done, but some of the text doesn't look old at all, so I have to wonder. Obviously the FOOTAGE is real, but I can't tell whether it's an old silent movie, or if it's just a "fake" one.
justforever96 1 year ago
>0:59~1:20 What was he doing? what was that cartridge?
Engine starter?
damedamewanko 1 year ago
480? are you sure you didn't mean 380 because the air speed record in 1939 was 469 mph, and biplanes arent really built to exceed 400 mph
mongorians22 1 year ago
@mongorians22 When it says "480" it's referring to the dive he just made..."and the wings stay on!" That was pretty good back then, to make a dive that fast and not shed your wings. Like you said, 480 is very fast for a biplane. But speed records are for LEVEL speed, how fast you can go on engine power alone. The P-38 had a max speed of like 400mph, but it could almost go supersonic in a dive. Early jet fighters could break Mach 1 in a shallow dive, but not in level flight, etc.
justforever96 1 year ago
As ever- a great video and music from Bomberguy- Thank you.
MCCXK120 1 year ago
Is there anyone who can explain to me how the heck a cartridge starter WORKS? I mean, beyond "you put the cartridge in the slot and fire it and it spins the engine...."
I mean, does it work sort of like an inertia starter, only it uses the blast to spin up the flywheel before in engages the clutch? Even just a hint or something would be great.
justforever96 1 year ago
@justforever96 When the cartridge is fired, the expanding gasses push down a piston in a small cylinder. At the bottom of the piston is a rack which connects to a cog in line with the crankshaft so the latter is set in motion and hopefully, if properly primed etc. the engine fires.
spitfireJEJ 1 year ago
@spitfireJEJ Thanks; I think I've figured out the theory, but it still annoys me a bit that I can't find any actual diagrams of a Coffman starter, or any videos of one being used (besides the scene in The Flight of The Phoenix, which I don't think is very accurate). If the engine started right up, it'd be fine, but considering how long they have to crank old engines to start them at air shows, it's hard to imagine; a cartridge can't last very long. But better than hand-cranking like the Bf 109!
justforever96 1 year ago
Wow, an old cartridge ignition.
CheetahFoxx 2 years ago
I can not believe that it is almost two years ago, that I´ve seen this video first. Again thank you for sharing and the excellent choice of music =)
Bazgatow87 2 years ago
well, navies around the world thought that biplanes were needed to get off and on carriers. Brits used them well into WWII, helping to sink the Bismark and the Italian battle fleet.
MadDogDucati 2 years ago
Because the Brits gave their carrier aviation the last priority in aircraft procurement and budget
jakefree25 2 years ago
probably, but the philosophy was also different.
MadDogDucati 2 years ago
@jakefree25 which was fortunate as the Bismark's anti aircraft guns were designed to shoot times planes flying at 300mph or above. They couldn't be calibrated for a plane flying as slow as the swordfish (98mph) and was defeated by the obsolescence of these planes.
binaway 1 year ago
@binaway The issue of Bismarck's poor AA gunnery has to be seen in context. Prior to the London Naval Treaty ships, NO capital ship had effective AA capacity; even then it wasn't until AA radar and VT fuses arrived that naval AA became a true counter to massed air attacks. All the old AA cruiser conversions demonstrate this, as does PoW's poor showing against massed G3Ms in 1941. Before 1944, the only effective AA defence at sea was a fighter CAP.
KrillLiberator 1 year ago
1:23 ng hmm?
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
These were in a couple movies made before the US got into WW2, including "Dive Bomber" from 1941. The F4F replaced it just before the US got into the war
DEP717 2 years ago
This is one of my favorite pre-war US planes--I have several books and plans for it. The F3F never saw combat in WW2. Its top speed was 250mph, while a Zero was 340mph. Would never have been used as a frontline fighter in WW2, as even the later F2A Buffalo was outclassed as a fighter. The SBD (Slow-But-Deadly nickname) Dauntless dive bomber was 250mph, so aviation progress simply surpassed this cute little biplane fighter by 1940. Still an important ancestor to the F4F and F6F USN fighters.
ralsterV 2 years ago
I like the position of the wheels in flight...
paulrandig 2 years ago
shotgun shell is to start the aircraft and i understand 480 mph is top speed in a dive !
jetstreamone 2 years ago
lol looks like a 8 guage shell
jetdog95 2 years ago
Why is 480 mph mentioned?
jagerfaust2009 2 years ago
@jagerfaust2009 capable of 480mph in a dive.
pramboy09 2 years ago
Actually Yes! it did fight the Zero, as the single winf F4F & F6F, both outgrowths of the F3F...& you all know what happenned...less manoeuvrable than the zero perhaps, but faster & much much tougher!!!
sbchelldiver 2 years ago
WHATS THE SHOTGUN CASE FOR????
jetdog95 2 years ago
To start the engine. It's actually a blank (no Shot), fired into the cylinders to turn the engine.
Tomcat425uk 2 years ago 5
the shotgun shell is a blank, this was used to start the motor, the blast would get the prop spinning & hopefully the motor would fire. shotgun shell starters were common in the prop planes.
kdraper2007 2 years ago
Beg to differ: this was a lovely 'plane...'crank-up' landing gear, but just charming. Yeah: I suppose it was a bit 'Polikarpov-esque', in certain ways. But the I-16 was basically a copy of the speed-winning planes of a couple of years prior.
bigkitten 2 years ago 4
whaaaaaaaaaat isnt the mustang faster?
leviterande 2 years ago
Haha and we thought that was good when Germany was making the 109, not even close to comparison with this plane
genysys20 2 years ago
Retractable gear on a biplane ! Did,nt see that everyday back then.
pinwizz69 2 years ago
Would have been 'interesting' getting into a dogfight with a Japanese Zero
dustziggy 3 years ago
Beautiful.
Parubhi 3 years ago 2
It all indicates that this bullet could have been a simple copy of the famous Sovietische Polikarpov 16, ain't it?
julay77 3 years ago
Polikarpow I153
xmeda 3 years ago
Ummmmmm, not really. Other than the fact that they're both single seat biplanes, they really don't have much in common.
blownglasslide 2 years ago
Straight and level it does 175/180 mph just cruising. It's a pretty speedy little airplane." When asked how maneuverable they are, he replied "... they do good loops and things but the ailerons are not very effective like you think they would be. It's actually kind of sluggish with a low roll rate
HRMOKeefe 3 years ago
Hinton, "... the thing accelerates real fast on take-off. When you push the throttle up you use 35 inches ... which is like 800 hp. The airplane rolls only a short distance before it breaks ground, so there's not a problem with directional control. The climb angle is real good. You don't have to run the engine very hard. It'll climb a couple of thousand foot a minute at 120 mph.
HRMOKeefe 3 years ago
The Air Museum Planes of Fame president, Steve Hinton, still flies the planes, described them as "... really good airplanes, well built." The three examples are basically stock. The instrumentation has been changed and modern brakes added, and manual gear retraction system is still in place,electric system can also be used.
HRMOKeefe 3 years ago
Three new F3Fs built in Ft Worth in the last few years, one now at Galveston Air museum?
HRMOKeefe 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
does anhyone have msn!!! msg me my msn live id is jane22fall R
asakurakleme 3 years ago
Cool video, thanks for posting!!!
ryanspeed 3 years ago
The Gulf Oil Co. GulfHawk F3F flew in airshows untill well after WW II.
The Brewster Buffalo, mentioned, above is an entirely differant aircraft.
J.C.
375GTB 3 years ago
What was that cartridge for?
saito125 3 years ago
The cartridge is for the Coffman starter. Basically it's using a blank shotgun shell to start the engine.
spencnaz 3 years ago
It never fired a shot in anger, but it trained many flyers. State of the art as far a biplanes went. Would have loved to have seen one go up against an Italian CR 42.
R686Mack 3 years ago
if the gloster gladiator could do it,the f3f could.the gladiator even had kills against the macchi monoplanes.the f3f would've been good against japanese perrys and fixed gear monoplane nates
osp80 3 years ago
Loved this lil Plane saw it fly at Amarillo Texas; incredibly maneuverable; they are BUILDING these again for special orders (Millionaires).
cajunhornet60 3 years ago
My grandad used to have one of those.
Awesome piece of work, though it makes landing tricky.
peepeevagi 3 years ago
An ex-military pilot named Al Williams, piloted a modified F3F called the "Gulfhawk",
for Gulf Oil.
It was used to test new oils, lubricants, etc,
during WW2.
It currently resides in the Smithsonian.
planeguy51 4 years ago
is it just me or does that look close to a F2A buffalo?
itsOthatOguy 4 years ago
Yeah, I think you're right.
The Buffalo was a much maligned airplane,
that the Finns used with great success against the Russians.
planeguy51 4 years ago
Oh for the days when you could just pick one of these up from a surplus sale :)
blownglasslide 4 years ago 2
Kind of nhard to think that only 5 years seperate the F3F from the F4F. Early F4F was also a bipe. this would be a cool plane to have. many WWII Navy & Marine pilots flew this in advanced training so it was an important aircraft.
kdraper2007 4 years ago
The 480mph was the speed in a dive, not level flight, and any less drag is a good thing regardless whether it's a biplane or not.
Grendelrex 4 years ago 2
480 mph? Who were they trying to kid? And who on earth thought it was a good idea to retract the u/c with all the other drag of a bipe? ;-) It's a KOFFMAN starter by the way. Used a special BLANK shotgun cartridge to ignite the mixture and get the motor running. Similar sort of effort used on some early jets.
DartDakota 4 years ago
Come on, they saved a lot of power by retracting the gear. It was a neat mechanism, too...when I was a kid I had an F3F-3 model with authentic working landing gear. Wish I still had it.
smurfswacker 4 years ago
What is that cartridge for (in "literally giving her the gun" episode)?
yyk99 4 years ago
Thats a starter cartridge. Basically a gas generator that starts the engine
Bomberguy 4 years ago 3
Yeah I bet it started with a cough, man! ;)
SmiertSpionem 4 years ago
Ah, hello.. Just researching some, as I picked up a 'Special Hobby' 1/72 F3F-3 kit for the Christmas competiton.. I now have a month to build it.. It's a nice kit to look at, with resin and etched brass.. but Im don't know what it's like to build yet.. :) :)
KurtGnu 4 years ago
Expect a tricky build? I don't like the sound of resin.
SmiertSpionem 4 years ago
Smiert.. Neither do I.. but it's things like the cockpit floor, and sides, which otherwise isn't included.. and it'll be easier to do the resin once it's sawn and cut off it's mould, than to scratchbuild with plastic card.. Not that I know why they did such a detailed cockpiot anyway, they provided a closed canopy.. :P The build will be as tricky as I make it.. :) It'll need some rigging, but I haven't yet found a decent picture to use, to see how the rigging goes.. :)
KurtGnu 4 years ago
I did the F3F in 1/32, it was extremely tricky to build: the propeller was connected with the undercarriage (done by Zahnräder - do not know the english word for it), so when you turn it, the undercarriage will go up/down, never saw this kind of mechansm again.
BaronKrolok 3 years ago
Baron.. Yes, I have read a review aboiut the 32nd scale model.. It's nice with moving parts, but they do tend to complicate the build.. :)
KurtGnu 3 years ago
I did the F3F in 1/32, it was extremely tricky to build: the propeller was connected with the undercarriage (done by Zahnräder - do not know the english word for it), so when you turn it, the undercarriage will go up/down, never saw this kind of mechansm again.
BaronKrolok 3 years ago
@Bomberguy Used also in "Flight of the Phoenix"--they only had three of them left when it was time to start the engine, leading to some tension.
killingamps 1 year ago
@yyk99 It is the starter, I believe it was called a Coffman Cartridge. The thing probably burns fairly slowly, but it does appear to be a shot gun shell, so maybe since they were fairly common perhaps was used without the shot They made self starters mandatory back in the day for the Indy 500/ Harry Miller was the Penske of his day, more so actually. He dicided to forgoe the standard fare of a battery and starter and used a similar system to the Coffman, which met the spirit of the rules.
505197 1 year ago
@yyk99 It looks like a 12 guage blank shell
MrJp990 6 months ago
My dad was a Navy airplane mechanic in the late 30's. He worked on a lot of F3F's, and we still have some photos of his squadron's F3F-3's. Dad was with Fighting 3, which used the "Felix the Cat" logo. (Earlier Felix had belonged to another squadron--VF-6, I think--but the logo went to VF-3 after some kind of reorganization.)
smurfswacker 4 years ago
Keep 'em coming, Bomberguy!
denberg2 4 years ago