Ferrari BECAME the best team after MS came on board. He played a vital role in forming the structure of the team itself, placing the right people in the right positions. NO OTHER DRIVER HAS EVER DONE THAT, partly because no team would allow their driver to dictate to them who they should hire for key team positions. Thats why Michael is the greatest of all time and will always be!
Senna just got the crowd in his back because he died so tragically when Senna was living. He was at least as controversial as Schumacher (both as a driver and as a person) is now, and no, not everybody considered him as the greatest thing since sliced bread. His death made him more popular - also as a driver. Sad, but true.
you must have been living under a rock when he was alive. People loved him all over the world even before he died. What are you trying to accomplish with your stupid, disrespectful comment?
it's funny how the less someone knows about something, the more they talk. You left like 500 comments and they're all retarded as hell. shut your mouth already because you seriously have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
64) Senna was not so fast and consistent as Schumacher in races. Senna also made many mistakes because could not be as fast as Michael maintaining the control.
53) Exactly. Though senna domonated MS in qualifying, MS is the better racer, tactician, developer, teamplayer. Overall the better driver. As an ambassador for the sport I would rate MS higher than AS. Their only black side is in racing ethics. They were both bad and it's difficult to say who's worse
36) Winning % with pole: Schumacher - 59% (37 poles & wins in 63 poles) Senna - 45% (29 in 65) Winning % without pole: Schumacher - 31% (46 wins in 150 races) Senna - 12% (12 wins in 97 races) Winning % with 2nd in Qual: Schumacher - 63% (25 wins in 40 2nd Qualifying chances) Senna - 23% (5 wins in 22 2nd qualifying chances) Winning % with Front row start: Schumacher - 60% (62 wins in 103 front row starts) Senna - 39% (34 wins in 87 front row starts)
16) Michael Schumacher towers over his era in Formula One like an omnipotent colossus. It was a move rooted in hubris - he wanted to become a legend by becoming known as the man who returned greatness to the sport's most legendary team. He paid the price for a few years as Ferrari struggled to beat Williams and then McLaren - but since 2000 the German and his team have indeed carved out the "Ferrari era". Schumacher is the greatest driver of all time.
15) Senna has just 19 fastest laps after 41 victorious races while Schumacher has 41 fastest laps after 41 victorious races (and Michael reached 19 fastest laps in his career already after 1995 french gp)
14) 1993 European grand prix: Many say this was Senna's greatest drive, but he dismissed this, saying it was "easy" because of traction-control (but people forget that he had traction control (reportedly the most evolved at the time) where Schumacher didn't have (only in Monaco some races after).
10) I think Schumacher would win based purely on his relentless race pace. Over a race distance Schumacher was the fastest driver ever in my opinion. Schumacher had 76 fastest laps in his career compared with Sennas 19. Senna would win over one lap in qualifying but in a race i give it to Schumacher everytime.
b) Senna won first 40 races 28 times from pole position but Schumacher won his first 40 races just 10 times from pole. And Senna never won any race lower than 5 place on starting grid but Michael did it 3 times from his first 40 victorious races.
6)I feel that winning a Race proves the worthiness of a driver much more than qualifying.
Michael has always had in his hand the fastest cars of the grid, huh??? This is only true in 2001, 2002 and 2004. I agree that Senna was one of the best & perhaps the most aggressive, Michael Schumacher is the Complete Driver.
4) People here criticize Michael for some of his very unfair moves but why aren't they pointing out the fact that Senna did exactly the same and ADMITTED IT after.
2) Schumacher is the most strategic, technical driver and further more is very gifted in his driving ability.. His driving style, while not as aggressive as Senna's, was far more consistent Michael took Ferrari on higher level. Senna always moved to better teams. From Lotus to Mclaren easily when Lotus was not seen as good. If Senna was the best he would had changed the team.
Senna might be good in qualifying but cannot match Schumi over a race distance.
And u gotta think whats more important qualify or whole race? Senna's qualifying ability means little in terms of his race ability. Even when Schumacher does not qualify especially well he is still able to finish well, usually on top of the podium, because he is able to constantly deliver laps faster than the rest of the field
LMAO. This is stupid... so biased toward Senna. This is a pole lap vs a practice lap. Schumacher wins because his a 7 time champion, Senna is a 3 time champion.
@refleXstarr cheating-schumi and better than Senna ..????????? Senna was and is a F1 God ...!!!!! Cheating schumi only a lousy car without the driver never creates ...!!!! and had no team orders not to soft cheating ..... Barricello schumi-forward can .... this is not a True Champion ..!!!! we see now at GP ... sorry if stupid ...!!!
in my opinion MS is the one with patience, knowledge and talent. And AS the driver with passion and talent. both had dark sides. both did everything to win no matter what and that is what makes a great driver!(my opinion) who cares Senna vs. Prost or Schumacher vs. Hill etc...? both did everything to win no matter what.....thats racing. look at monza vs hammilton he did everything possible to stay infront! in my eyes the best race besides canada this year so far. Schumi go! Senna i miss u R.I.P
SCHUMACHER DROVE IN THIS RACE 3,5 MONTHS AFTER HIS LEG HAD BEEN SEVERELY BROKEN @ TWO SPOTS, HE COULD BARELY STEP ON HIS FOOT IN THAT CAR, GOT THE POLE & DID HIS EVERYTHING TO MAKE IRVINE THE WDC! TO ALL MR. "MANUALS"...WHO LIKE TO PLAY "MANUALLY."
Senna with a car back then which were like taming dinosaurs and a total death trap plus manual stick gear, and Schumi's 10 year later car can't beat him, that's a bit strange.
@ferrarif1360 oh god... brother, how many times did you see Schumacher moving his right hand from the steering wheel in this whole lap?? Did you, Mr Downshift , know that Sukuka was and still is one of the most difficult circuits in F1? with some really demanding corners? Got it now or should I be more specific??? answers in a post card. Please, give us a break and shift me gear, you can use my stick... wink wink, say no more...
@justdecay Justdecay, the image is tiny and of low quality. Let's be honest, it's impossible to tell from that image, moreover from that angle you cant see his fingertips shifting the car. Got it now....wink, wink, By the way, it may help if when you make your responses you aren't drunk or stoned. You are very nearly incoherent. It is still a terrifying track regardless of the era. Senna was unreal, so was Schumacher.
@ferrarif1360 My God, you are so freaking stupid that you're still arguing something which is beyond argument. Moreover, nonetheless, your English not withstanding, you/re missing the point here. it does not matter whether Schumacher was shifting his gears with the tip of fingers or with the tip of his d*ck, The point here is that he keeps both hands at the wheel at all times whereas drivers 15 years ago had to take one hand off on their way into corners, middle and out of them!! got it now???
@MUSIC1SMYSALVATION not to mention traction control system, brakes, aerodynamics and lots of others advantages that made it easier for Schumi. Just notice how Senna's car shakes.
@Jerycho94 And Schumacher also have compeditors that can use both their hands on the entire track while Sennas compeditors must change gears manually. So whats your point???? Do you think Schumacher was looking for the fastest run or to beat his compeditors?? Theres always a higher risk to drive faster. Schumacher "had a better car". I can tell you, Schumacher is the one that developed alot of Ferrari cause of his insight and technical ability. This is absolutely a part of this sport.
@varfordogjesus sorry...but senna's time is slightly worse than schumacher's time...so to make almost the same time with '89 mclaren vs. a car who is with 10 years advanced,you must be brilliant...and this is Senna, just brilliant.
@Jerycho94 You missed something in my earlier comment. "....do you think Schumacher was looking for the fastest run...theres awalys a higher risk to drive faster". As I said. There never was any reason for Schumacher to drive faster when he is in first place. Theres also many things that today are banned. For example; active suspension, ground effect, turbochargers, no bigger engine than V8. Since -94 you also have the "board" that is placed under the car that bounds the driving.
@varfordogjesus one question...if Senna don't died at Imola you think that Schumi still win 7 world championships?..Schumacher is awesome..but not brilliant..Schumacher drives with his senses not with his heart...Schumacher was exacly and is exacly at this moment..but Senna was the passion, "PURE RACING" as he say, so i don't have anything with Schumi..but in a coparison with Senna is a little bit complicated.
@Jerycho94 I think it would have been more even. So what?? Schumacher still competed with great drivers as; Hekkinen, Barrichelo, Räikkönen. Beated Senna:s 65 pole position records!!! Senna was very gifted and a great F1 driver, but the fact that we will never ever know whether Schumacher could have beaten Senna or vice versa should not lead to Schumacher's down fall!!! You only see Senna with a heart for driving. I see both, thats the difference.
@Jerycho94 You also have Irvine that Schumacher was beating. Senna had Cecotto, a great driver. And Brundle was driving both against Senna and Schumacher. Also a great driver. Schumacher won against Brundle though.
@Jerycho94 One question. Did u think Senna had a HEART of driving cos he was changing his gears manually. Or cos u saw that as if he was masturbating?
@Jerycho94 It was more a joke than seriousity. Im a fan of both of these drivers. You are not the only one, true. But maybe u are the only one that say that Schumacher dont.
Very nice to see two champions on the same track with a ten years difference. Come and see my profile to watch my (virtual) lap at Suzuka with technical info, explaining the lines a driver has to take into great detail.
@thehitchrules I still love it too, but those days were so much better man ... nowadays it is more like a battle between the pilot vs his human nature of making mistakes. On those days the car was a wild beast that the driver had to control
@arkeivi Yea, I agree with you. We took it for granted at the time. Golden days. Even the drivers of today can't comprehend driving those cars (back then ) on the limit. Makes you wonder just how skillful the drivers of today really are. Will still be glued watching Spa this weekend.
@hunt2727 You've got to be kidding. You said that Senna's 1993 McLaren was full of electronics. Now THAT shows how ignorant you are. When Senna died he had 3 poles that season and was leading the race with a very unstable car. You should read more.
Senseless to compare two absolutely different vehicle eras. If you'd like to compare both, compare them in 1993 and 1994, and both were absolutely outstanding at those times.
you cant compare this.! two different cars with different technology and power....senna had the fastest racing car built on earth with no driving aids....while schumacher had electronic driving aids and different grip technology
@Insanaty You are right! Shitmacher, who really doesn't exist, will never be so good as Senna was. Schumacher is one of the greats as well as Senna! Thank you for the SO MUCH SENCE of your statement..... LOL
Its called Senna from 2010 and it was made by Asif Kapadia, there are two versions of it, one with 1hour,40 minutes aprox (theater version) and another one with 2hours and 40 minutes aprox. (extended not edited version). You can buy it or get it via torrents.
In 1989 they had only banned turbos, and teams had to come up with NA engines that year. By 1999, those engines were almost reaching their peak performance, so you can't compare this, by any means.
Senna was a god amongst men. A true legend & an inspiration. I was 14 yrs old when he passed away & it was the first time I saw my father cry. It wasn't until I matured that I understood why. A hero is a very important thing for any man & Senna is a role model that any man should look up to.
The Senna movie is a must for any fan. Very emotional & I'm sad I never got to see his genius with my own eyes.
Notice how Senna is reaching down to shift. This is the older style gearbox that didn't have the paddles on the steering wheel yet. Amazing that in some turns he is one handing the wheel thru the turns.
I am so lucky to have been able to watch Senna race through his prime then Shumacher. Both great drivers indeed.
Doing exactly or even better what Shumi is doing, with a manual gearbox and a car that doesnt have the same amount of downforce and electronic aids is just fantastic.
In old times Senna was fast like a bullet with a crappy and not safe technology. Back then Shumacher was like a little boy playing need for speed against real racers!
@vicxon100 Well, Schumi qualified on pole that year despite the McLaren arguably being the better car and having broken his leg earlier in the year. As for the cars, the McLaren has less downforce, but a lot more rubber on the road. It also had qualifying tyres designed for one fast lap. If there's any comparison to be made on lap times, most cars in 1999 were about 1.5 sec quicker than the car in the same spot in 1989. Schumacher was only .6 sec quicker than Senna.
Senna won in Donninton 93 in the rain with a car full of electronic aids, while Schumacher had not any electronic aid. Even Michael Andretti in that Mclaren overtook Schumi! That was a joke!!!
But in Barcelona 92 in the rain, both drove with no traction controls, and Senna could not be as fast as Schumacher and finally Senna crashed trying to catch Schumi. First victory of Schumacher, Spa 92, and there was rain, beating Mansell, Senna... everyone !
senna its jus better driver than schumi... u cant ccompare this 2 cars cuz of the diference of tecnologys in both cars. but SEnna its the best driver ever!!!
U CANT COMPARE THIS,,,,BOO-MACHER DID.NT TAKE HIS HANDS OFF THE WHEEL ONCE,FFS,HE SHUD OF DONE IT IN SENNA.S CAR,THEN WE,D SEE HOW SO-CALLED GOOD HE WAS,,,,,LONG LIVE AYRTON,,,,
10 years in Formula 1 evolution is humungus big. In china, red bull beat the lap record owned by ferrari's V10 car from 2004, in 2004 the ferrari had around 1000hp, todays formula 1 cars have around 750hp, 250hp less! Now imagine the chassis and brake evolutions, not to mention the adrian newey genius at aerodynamics!
why this video have more than 1000 likes?? I mean, this comparison is completely nonsense. The Ferrari would be like 3 or 4 seconds faster anywhere, perhaps more.
@RyckardPT but you can see that the laptimes are almost even, and senna has to work much harder , damn that was a bumpy ride, and almost as quick as Schumi.
Any1 who knows or driven an old car compared to a new must know senna is better driver older models r like deathtraps. Lmao when he moved to williams for the gadgets they changed the rules. N i reckon shumacer would be a few titles light if senna lived.
I haven't been a fan of F1 for a while, just got into it recently. However the fact that the lap times were that close to each other even when senna is using a 10 year old f1 car is astonishing, and shows the skill of Aryton Senna
When it comes to stuff like this you base them on facts all i have to say is MICHAEL SCHUMACHER 7 champion AYRTON SENNA 3 champion naw whos the best? it has to be MICHAEL SCHUMACHER , who cares if Senna died and he was good at the time of his death, aint my fault his dead =)
sorry but schumacher wouldn't have been schumacher if Senna didn't die. He's a good driver, no doubt, but he had the luck of not being a total beginner by the time Senna passed, as well as being the number 1 ferrari driver at Ferrari's very best cars (by comparison) ever. I even think Alain Prost was a far better driver than schumi.
@kriklan49 it wasn't only suspected, but benetton was caught in 94 for having a higher fuel input valve than it was allowed to. Ayrton knew this and that they that they had traction control although that was never proven. That team was just dirty that year, it served them well receiving a 500,000 dollar fine.
@CapoeiraPiper Thanks for this info. Well, 500 grand, what is it for a F1 team? I think that F1 racing is a wonderful idea, but the FIA spoils it absolutely. Their regulatiuons and penalty decisions are just ridiculous. By the way, have you heard about the technical regulations for year 2013? They want the F1 to be more ECO.
If they want any motorsport to be Eco, why dont they just cancel the championship? The logic is almost the same.
@kriklan49 im right there with you. But since F1 is one of the primary forces of automotive evolution I see the sense in the in it. It's already brought so many automotive developments with restrictions and regulations anyways. I just hope they don't overdo it.
Michael Schumacher got to finish his career, while Senna was killed prematurely. Had Senna got to finish his career, it may have been a different story. Also, how would Senna have been in a car with todays technology. Senna is the best race car driver hands down. NO QUESTION ABOUT IT! Senna also had something else that Schumacher lacks... it's called CLASS....
@ryapickinup I agree with you... Senna could've been a fantastic driver with the new F1 cars today, but for sure I'd say that he'd have been very bored and could've decided to retire very soon coz what he liked about F1 is the challenge... But, F1 is not challenging anymore is it?... It's like a play station set for professional drivers. That time was, as Senna said, pure driving.
Schumacher drives with precision and technical accuracy, Senna drove with his soul and a natural ability that I don't think we will ever see again ... Senna was one of a kind
Senna no electronics...others...just robots....and at the end of the round they was at the same point...Put a today pilot on that old seat and i'll wait to see what he will do....if he will do something....
Senna finished a Race only with the 6th Gear. Schumacher does the same in a Grand Prix (Spa/Belgium). It´´s not a question who was better, it was other Technical standard. Today is Vettel No.1 and you can´´t say, that Senna was better than Vettel, because they never have a have a race against. Vettel won his first Race with a very slow car on heavy rain, that´´s the same like Senna.
Running on a rainy day with flat tires and win the race, only Senna same ...
Running with a car in the hands of any one serving to be tardy and still win the race (I'm
speaking of his first victory in Formula 1) only Senna same ... He's simply the best in sports today, and if he had not died in that accident, nor Schumacher
With all my respect to Senna. Schumacher is the King. Just check Senna's comments.."I'm having a hard time keeping with this Kid..." Talking about a young and inexperience Schumacher with a Second Class Benneton!!!
Around sometime in 2006, I had an opportunity to chat with an Indy driver who drove formula 1 as well (he is retired now) and asked him if he considered Schumi as the greatest ever and he said, very close based on records, but he would give it to Senna just on talent.
@Legendary081 Why can't people just accept it's not possible to compare the two? Schumacher's prime and Senna's death overlapped. The sport evolved beyond all recognition in '98, and again in '01 because of the electronics and wheelbase - it became a different sport. Unfortunately, Schumacher's success in the car he created made the sport take step after step from 2004 to stop it being a straight race, just a manipulatively 'fair' chance to let the underdogs compete.
@WhyGenFM3 Senna was chosen the best of all times from F1 as A.S sayd in 1993 "since now the cars are winning the Gps the drivers does not have to do anything!"
Ayrton was the only rider capable of winning that I saw a race in extremely adverse conditions. He does not always had the best car, he was not always the best team, the best technology. Can not count on a second pilot squire. For many, many times they played dirty with him, yet he never gave up. He won not only great world champions but also all the "Dark forces" the politics of F1. The strength of Ayrton was in your heart and your spirit.
Sorry du'ds clear me? Senna drives a mechaniks speeds car and the other was automatic????.... no comparations senna drives anithing on everywherre...let's give he a chance... Ayrton The King of 80/90 and more...
Look how hard Senna is working in 1989 compared to Schumacher in 1999.... Formula 1 became too easy and less about the Driver and more about the car and its electronic gadgets.
@Legendary081 well to say senna would never lose against rosberg even at an age of 50 like you said is pure bullshit. i agree that schum. never had a top teammate, but senna also never had another great qualifier as teammate, beside the three races against the very young hakkinen (who wasn´t close to his prime time!) and hakkinen was closer to him than any other guy before and could beat him in his first qualifying! in the second race senna was only 0,1sec faster than hakkinen. regards sunnyAK
@oneinamillion232 they only were teammates for three races and hakkinen was far from his prime time! in the second race hakkinen again had almost the same time as senna. senna never had a really fast young guy in his team challing him beside the three races with hakkinen and there it was difficult for senna and he wasn´t that dominant in the qualifyings! sunnyak.forenworld.at
Hunt2727 is an ass! mocking Senna fans for not knowing thier facts then posts big lies to make schumi look better than he actually was!
Here's the truth so you know In 93 Scumi's ford was always 2 specs ahead of Senna's (condition under which Briatore allowed ford to sell engines to other teams fact!) Schumi's valve's where therefore pneumatic and Senna's spring loaded so schumi's max rpm was roughly 2000 more!
Dont know who is better senna or schumacher but we can say that senna did not raced just whit good race driver, he raced whit the giants Mansell, Prost, Niki Lauda, Nelson Piquet... with a inferior Tolleman and Lotus wining races looking for gaps with no limits and no fear of death.
Não da pra comparar um carro de 89 com um de 99 pela mor de Deus a diferença é gigante 89 o cambio ainda era manual e esse video só mostrou ainda mais a qualidade de senna ele é anos luz melhor que shumacher !!
i think that senna was the fastest driver ever but if we look at the races...well..the best f1 driver is michael schumacher. numbers can show it...senna takes 65 poles but "only" 41 wins and 19 fastest laps....schumacher takes 68 poles ok but 91wins and 76 fl are impossible to beat
@HavocTimeful Schaumacher had so many wins, because Senna died to early. Besides, a good driver is recognized on the track, not on numbers. Nobody forgot that Senna with a inferior car, could do great things. In Donington in 1993, he made the 1st lap, from 5ft place to 1st place in four turns, in 1988 he made from 14th place to 4th in less than 4 laps, with a camel lotus, in 1993, Canada, he made form 8th to 3th in less than 2 laps. Senna was the greatest ever, and even Schumacher agreed...
@MegaLandini i agree with you about senna's races but i grew up with schumacher's win and it was very exciting for me....i remember suzuka 2000, brasil 2006, usa 2003, china 2006, monaco 1997, spain, spa 1996 and many other...you've seen senna and think that he's the best as well as those who have seen jim clark thinks that he's the best....and maybe in the future people will think that vettel or hamilton are the strongest....times change.
Ferrari BECAME the best team after MS came on board. He played a vital role in forming the structure of the team itself, placing the right people in the right positions. NO OTHER DRIVER HAS EVER DONE THAT, partly because no team would allow their driver to dictate to them who they should hire for key team positions. Thats why Michael is the greatest of all time and will always be!
vertel84 1 month ago
Senna just got the crowd in his back because he died so tragically when Senna was living. He was at least as controversial as Schumacher (both as a driver and as a person) is now, and no, not everybody considered him as the greatest thing since sliced bread. His death made him more popular - also as a driver. Sad, but true.
vertel84 2 months ago
@vertel84
you must have been living under a rock when he was alive. People loved him all over the world even before he died. What are you trying to accomplish with your stupid, disrespectful comment?
AlexBrasil123123 2 months ago 2
@vertel84
it's funny how the less someone knows about something, the more they talk. You left like 500 comments and they're all retarded as hell. shut your mouth already because you seriously have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
AlexBrasil123123 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
64) Senna was not so fast and consistent as Schumacher in races. Senna also made many mistakes because could not be as fast as Michael maintaining the control.
vertel84 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
53) Exactly. Though senna domonated MS in qualifying, MS is the better racer, tactician, developer, teamplayer. Overall the better driver. As an ambassador for the sport I would rate MS higher than AS. Their only black side is in racing ethics. They were both bad and it's difficult to say who's worse
vertel84 2 months ago
41) Michael is rather a mixture of Senna and Prost.
vertel84 2 months ago
vertel84 2 months ago
16) Michael Schumacher towers over his era in Formula One like an omnipotent colossus. It was a move rooted in hubris - he wanted to become a legend by becoming known as the man who returned greatness to the sport's most legendary team. He paid the price for a few years as Ferrari struggled to beat Williams and then McLaren - but since 2000 the German and his team have indeed carved out the "Ferrari era". Schumacher is the greatest driver of all time.
vertel84 2 months ago
15) Senna has just 19 fastest laps after 41 victorious races while Schumacher has 41 fastest laps after 41 victorious races (and Michael reached 19 fastest laps in his career already after 1995 french gp)
vertel84 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
14) 1993 European grand prix: Many say this was Senna's greatest drive, but he dismissed this, saying it was "easy" because of traction-control (but people forget that he had traction control (reportedly the most evolved at the time) where Schumacher didn't have (only in Monaco some races after).
vertel84 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
10) I think Schumacher would win based purely on his relentless race pace. Over a race distance Schumacher was the fastest driver ever in my opinion. Schumacher had 76 fastest laps in his career compared with Sennas 19. Senna would win over one lap in qualifying but in a race i give it to Schumacher everytime.
vertel84 2 months ago
11) Senna was fast but erratic
vertel84 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
b) Senna won first 40 races 28 times from pole position but Schumacher won his first 40 races just 10 times from pole. And Senna never won any race lower than 5 place on starting grid but Michael did it 3 times from his first 40 victorious races.
vertel84 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
6)I feel that winning a Race proves the worthiness of a driver much more than qualifying.
Michael has always had in his hand the fastest cars of the grid, huh??? This is only true in 2001, 2002 and 2004. I agree that Senna was one of the best & perhaps the most aggressive, Michael Schumacher is the Complete Driver.
vertel84 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
4) People here criticize Michael for some of his very unfair moves but why aren't they pointing out the fact that Senna did exactly the same and ADMITTED IT after.
vertel84 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2) Schumacher is the most strategic, technical driver and further more is very gifted in his driving ability.. His driving style, while not as aggressive as Senna's, was far more consistent Michael took Ferrari on higher level. Senna always moved to better teams. From Lotus to Mclaren easily when Lotus was not seen as good. If Senna was the best he would had changed the team.
vertel84 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1) No other team in f1 history had so much amount to its driver like Ferrari had to Michael.
vertel84 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Senna might be good in qualifying but cannot match Schumi over a race distance.
And u gotta think whats more important qualify or whole race? Senna's qualifying ability means little in terms of his race ability. Even when Schumacher does not qualify especially well he is still able to finish well, usually on top of the podium, because he is able to constantly deliver laps faster than the rest of the field
vertel84 2 months ago
LMAO. This is stupid... so biased toward Senna. This is a pole lap vs a practice lap. Schumacher wins because his a 7 time champion, Senna is a 3 time champion.
refleXstarr 2 months ago
@refleXstarr cheating-schumi and better than Senna ..????????? Senna was and is a F1 God ...!!!!! Cheating schumi only a lousy car without the driver never creates ...!!!! and had no team orders not to soft cheating ..... Barricello schumi-forward can .... this is not a True Champion ..!!!! we see now at GP ... sorry if stupid ...!!!
BlackLabel0660 2 months ago
first things first.. Different cars, no matter how years passed, they are NOT comparable..
mlcorreia 2 months ago
schumachers video is slowed down a bit, because they want to demonstrate the track!
haninngway 2 months ago
in my opinion MS is the one with patience, knowledge and talent. And AS the driver with passion and talent. both had dark sides. both did everything to win no matter what and that is what makes a great driver!(my opinion) who cares Senna vs. Prost or Schumacher vs. Hill etc...? both did everything to win no matter what.....thats racing. look at monza vs hammilton he did everything possible to stay infront! in my eyes the best race besides canada this year so far. Schumi go! Senna i miss u R.I.P
SLiDaRr 2 months ago
Thumbs up for Senna!
End of.
aminman15 2 months ago 4
SCHUMACHER DROVE IN THIS RACE 3,5 MONTHS AFTER HIS LEG HAD BEEN SEVERELY BROKEN @ TWO SPOTS, HE COULD BARELY STEP ON HIS FOOT IN THAT CAR, GOT THE POLE & DID HIS EVERYTHING TO MAKE IRVINE THE WDC! TO ALL MR. "MANUALS"...WHO LIKE TO PLAY "MANUALLY."
ilksen2010 2 months ago in playlist Ayrton Senna
OMFG !! This us the ultimate of any fucking comparison between the G.O.A.T and Schumi.
1989 x 1999 cars ... and still so close ? Holy cow ! Is easy to see Schumi is faster in straights .. and Senna does it in corners.
Holy cow .. the GOAT Senna, RIP .. my friend !
Tyler83Mr 3 months ago
guys, it's same as we compare 2pac with eminem :)
bestisbmw 3 months ago
1999 Pole:1:37.470
1989 Pole:1:38.041
eireoflot82 3 months ago
Senna- you`re simply the best !!!!
10 years before....manual shift....less horse powers.....same results....
the diference is: Arms!!!!
The F1 races will never be the same without your genius!!!!
Thanks 4 making our brasilians sundays so pleasant!!!!
RIP
fredman106 3 months ago
Senna with a car back then which were like taming dinosaurs and a total death trap plus manual stick gear, and Schumi's 10 year later car can't beat him, that's a bit strange.
NationOfMasturbation 3 months ago 3
senna wins :>
linomaluco 3 months ago 5
STFU EVERYONE, SENNA IS BETTER THAN SCHUMACHER, NO COMMENTS MORE, PLEASE.
soneca19900 4 months ago
SENNA.
diocleziano01 4 months ago
Ayrton !!!
NEWaYRTON 4 months ago
Funny thing is, I didn't see the great Schumi manually shifting a gear in this entire video,,, wink wink, say no more...
justdecay 4 months ago
@justdecay I might be wrong, but I think in the year of the video for the Schumacher car, there were automatic upshifts but not downshifts.
ferrarif1360 4 months ago
@ferrarif1360 oh god... brother, how many times did you see Schumacher moving his right hand from the steering wheel in this whole lap?? Did you, Mr Downshift , know that Sukuka was and still is one of the most difficult circuits in F1? with some really demanding corners? Got it now or should I be more specific??? answers in a post card. Please, give us a break and shift me gear, you can use my stick... wink wink, say no more...
justdecay 4 months ago
@justdecay Justdecay, the image is tiny and of low quality. Let's be honest, it's impossible to tell from that image, moreover from that angle you cant see his fingertips shifting the car. Got it now....wink, wink, By the way, it may help if when you make your responses you aren't drunk or stoned. You are very nearly incoherent. It is still a terrifying track regardless of the era. Senna was unreal, so was Schumacher.
ferrarif1360 4 months ago
@ferrarif1360 My God, you are so freaking stupid that you're still arguing something which is beyond argument. Moreover, nonetheless, your English not withstanding, you/re missing the point here. it does not matter whether Schumacher was shifting his gears with the tip of fingers or with the tip of his d*ck, The point here is that he keeps both hands at the wheel at all times whereas drivers 15 years ago had to take one hand off on their way into corners, middle and out of them!! got it now???
MUSIC1SMYSALVATION 4 months ago
@MUSIC1SMYSALVATION not to mention traction control system, brakes, aerodynamics and lots of others advantages that made it easier for Schumi. Just notice how Senna's car shakes.
arkeivi 4 months ago
@arkeivi and Schumi drive with both hands on the entire track , while Senna must change gears manual.
Jerycho94 3 months ago 17
@Jerycho94 And Schumacher also have compeditors that can use both their hands on the entire track while Sennas compeditors must change gears manually. So whats your point???? Do you think Schumacher was looking for the fastest run or to beat his compeditors?? Theres always a higher risk to drive faster. Schumacher "had a better car". I can tell you, Schumacher is the one that developed alot of Ferrari cause of his insight and technical ability. This is absolutely a part of this sport.
varfordogjesus 2 months ago
@varfordogjesus sorry...but senna's time is slightly worse than schumacher's time...so to make almost the same time with '89 mclaren vs. a car who is with 10 years advanced,you must be brilliant...and this is Senna, just brilliant.
Jerycho94 2 months ago
@Jerycho94 You missed something in my earlier comment. "....do you think Schumacher was looking for the fastest run...theres awalys a higher risk to drive faster". As I said. There never was any reason for Schumacher to drive faster when he is in first place. Theres also many things that today are banned. For example; active suspension, ground effect, turbochargers, no bigger engine than V8. Since -94 you also have the "board" that is placed under the car that bounds the driving.
varfordogjesus 2 months ago
@Jerycho94 Senna was a great driver. But so is Schumacher. And who did take most WC titles??
varfordogjesus 2 months ago
@varfordogjesus one question...if Senna don't died at Imola you think that Schumi still win 7 world championships?..Schumacher is awesome..but not brilliant..Schumacher drives with his senses not with his heart...Schumacher was exacly and is exacly at this moment..but Senna was the passion, "PURE RACING" as he say, so i don't have anything with Schumi..but in a coparison with Senna is a little bit complicated.
Jerycho94 2 months ago
@Jerycho94 I think it would have been more even. So what?? Schumacher still competed with great drivers as; Hekkinen, Barrichelo, Räikkönen. Beated Senna:s 65 pole position records!!! Senna was very gifted and a great F1 driver, but the fact that we will never ever know whether Schumacher could have beaten Senna or vice versa should not lead to Schumacher's down fall!!! You only see Senna with a heart for driving. I see both, thats the difference.
varfordogjesus 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jerycho94 You also have Irvine that Schumacher was beating. Senna had Cecotto, a great driver. And Brundle was driving both against Senna and Schumacher. Also a great driver. Schumacher won against Brundle though.
varfordogjesus 2 months ago
@Jerycho94 One question. Did u think Senna had a HEART of driving cos he was changing his gears manually. Or cos u saw that as if he was masturbating?
varfordogjesus 2 months ago
@varfordogjesus c'mon you're from Schumacher fan's club or what?...i'm not the only pers who say that Senna drive with his "heart"...so keep cool!
Jerycho94 2 months ago
@Jerycho94 It was more a joke than seriousity. Im a fan of both of these drivers. You are not the only one, true. But maybe u are the only one that say that Schumacher dont.
varfordogjesus 2 months ago
@ferrarif1360 it was butterfly, left down, right up
arkeivi 4 months ago
10 years later, and at some point Senna catched up in late braking ! You could notice in track side lines. Senna 4ever
burns985 4 months ago
Michael had the numbers, Senna had the talent.
ChapolinBatera 4 months ago 4
@ChapolinBatera Agreed
burns985 4 months ago
I agree with you! No comparisons! The times were different! Schumacher was a cheater! Today, the poor do not win anything!
hayabusanordeste 5 months ago
Schumacher was an excelent driver but there is nothing like Ayrton Senna !!!!!!!! simply the greatest !!!!
akula1055 5 months ago 3
Te amo Ayrton!!!
luizgracie 5 months ago
Very nice to see two champions on the same track with a ten years difference. Come and see my profile to watch my (virtual) lap at Suzuka with technical info, explaining the lines a driver has to take into great detail.
TheyCallTheSandman 5 months ago
10 anos à mais de tecnologia no carro do schumacher e praticamente o mesmo tempo de ambos....
o alemão é bom, mas sem comparação com Senna
joaobtssj 5 months ago
They should bring the F1 cars back to those days, stick and hard to drive, fuck all this eletronic shit
arkeivi 5 months ago 28
@arkeivi with 1200 horsepower qualifying engines. The drivers absolutely loved those cars!
niv06290 5 months ago
@arkeivi completely agree. way too much emphasis on technology. Still love it though.
thehitchrules 5 months ago
@thehitchrules I still love it too, but those days were so much better man ... nowadays it is more like a battle between the pilot vs his human nature of making mistakes. On those days the car was a wild beast that the driver had to control
arkeivi 5 months ago
@arkeivi Yea, I agree with you. We took it for granted at the time. Golden days. Even the drivers of today can't comprehend driving those cars (back then ) on the limit. Makes you wonder just how skillful the drivers of today really are. Will still be glued watching Spa this weekend.
thehitchrules 5 months ago
@thehitchrules For sure, qualifying tomorrow ... Senna's nephew will be racing again
arkeivi 5 months ago
@arkeivi He'll be in the lotus black and gold trim just like Senna's car in 1985 .
thehitchrules 5 months ago
@arkeivi Yeah, there was the x-factor in the cars before....
TUTOU 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@arkeivi
"They should bring the F1 cars back to those days, stick and hard to drive, fuck all this eletronic shit"
theres barely any electronics anymore you ignorant moron.
joyfulvulture 2 months ago
to watch old f1 seasons of the last 22 years for free check out classicgrandprixclub
foginabog 6 months ago
@hunt2727 You've got to be kidding. You said that Senna's 1993 McLaren was full of electronics. Now THAT shows how ignorant you are. When Senna died he had 3 poles that season and was leading the race with a very unstable car. You should read more.
binhonz 6 months ago
Senseless to compare two absolutely different vehicle eras. If you'd like to compare both, compare them in 1993 and 1994, and both were absolutely outstanding at those times.
t3hroOf 6 months ago
you cant compare this.! two different cars with different technology and power....senna had the fastest racing car built on earth with no driving aids....while schumacher had electronic driving aids and different grip technology
AKITILOgamemachine 6 months ago
my god delete the stupid schumacher video!
Apoic123 6 months ago
senna was the best believe ir or not
crazycraches 6 months ago
shitmacher = cheater will never, never, never, never so good like senna
Insanaty 6 months ago
@Insanaty You are right! Shitmacher, who really doesn't exist, will never be so good as Senna was. Schumacher is one of the greats as well as Senna! Thank you for the SO MUCH SENCE of your statement..... LOL
racemise 6 months ago
@racemise you are to stupid to understand my comment
Insanaty 6 months ago
@Insanaty No, no, no... Don't talk about my mental capacity writing the comments you wrote... Anyhow I was making fun of you, LOL...
racemise 6 months ago
@racemise again, you are to stupid for my royal comments
Insanaty 6 months ago
SENNA WAS THE BEST. SIMPLE.
artur4467 6 months ago 4
I hear you :)
Its called Senna from 2010 and it was made by Asif Kapadia, there are two versions of it, one with 1hour,40 minutes aprox (theater version) and another one with 2hours and 40 minutes aprox. (extended not edited version). You can buy it or get it via torrents.
f0XxXxXxX 6 months ago
E P I C ! ! !
dia8el 6 months ago
In 1989 they had only banned turbos, and teams had to come up with NA engines that year. By 1999, those engines were almost reaching their peak performance, so you can't compare this, by any means.
efusiongaming 6 months ago
Although Michael was faster on his lap, Ayrton was by far better driver, Rest in Peace Ayrton.
SebbyHaughtonf1 6 months ago
Two true Legends
poddesetnikG 6 months ago 2
@Legendary081
Your an idiot!
rockie071 6 months ago
oeee oeeee oeee oeee.... senna senaaaa...!!!!!
pineza 6 months ago
10years of evolution ??
depret5 6 months ago
Senna was a god amongst men. A true legend & an inspiration. I was 14 yrs old when he passed away & it was the first time I saw my father cry. It wasn't until I matured that I understood why. A hero is a very important thing for any man & Senna is a role model that any man should look up to.
The Senna movie is a must for any fan. Very emotional & I'm sad I never got to see his genius with my own eyes.
david101316 6 months ago 4
Notice how Senna is reaching down to shift. This is the older style gearbox that didn't have the paddles on the steering wheel yet. Amazing that in some turns he is one handing the wheel thru the turns.
I am so lucky to have been able to watch Senna race through his prime then Shumacher. Both great drivers indeed.
commandrow 6 months ago
equal time !!!
fabiano75s 6 months ago
Doing exactly or even better what Shumi is doing, with a manual gearbox and a car that doesnt have the same amount of downforce and electronic aids is just fantastic.
f0XxXxXxX 7 months ago 2
In old times Senna was fast like a bullet with a crappy and not safe technology. Back then Shumacher was like a little boy playing need for speed against real racers!
melkisedeck 7 months ago
you can't compare schumacher and senna becous senna is a real driver, schumacher is just a guy with a fast car
vicxon100 7 months ago
@vicxon100 Well, Schumi qualified on pole that year despite the McLaren arguably being the better car and having broken his leg earlier in the year. As for the cars, the McLaren has less downforce, but a lot more rubber on the road. It also had qualifying tyres designed for one fast lap. If there's any comparison to be made on lap times, most cars in 1999 were about 1.5 sec quicker than the car in the same spot in 1989. Schumacher was only .6 sec quicker than Senna.
gturner38 6 months ago
wow senna had to shift gears by taking his hands off the steering wheel.
cardude1992 7 months ago
@cardude1992 Schumacher also droved in the are of manual gear shifts in F1
osteomex 7 months ago in playlist Ayrton Senna 3
@esukem
i don't think so...
1HeerenveenSC 7 months ago
SENNA THE BEST EVER.
thehitchrules 7 months ago
Senna is a legend - Schumacher a living legend!
WWEBorusse 7 months ago in playlist Ayrton Senna 3
stop the nonsense debate about who's better schumy or senna.. they both are amazing driver... who care about "the greatest " title ??
respect for senna and schumy !!
maskmanyeah 7 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Senna won in Donninton 93 in the rain with a car full of electronic aids, while Schumacher had not any electronic aid. Even Michael Andretti in that Mclaren overtook Schumi! That was a joke!!!
But in Barcelona 92 in the rain, both drove with no traction controls, and Senna could not be as fast as Schumacher and finally Senna crashed trying to catch Schumi. First victory of Schumacher, Spa 92, and there was rain, beating Mansell, Senna... everyone !
Schumacher is the greatest driver ever!!
hunt2727 7 months ago
Não há comparação. Senna sempre será o melhor.
aquariosmaster 7 months ago
"THE BEST DRIVER WHO EVER LIVED" -Niki Lauda.
thehitchrules 7 months ago
SENNA TRUE CHAMP NO DOUBT.............
shwamaal 7 months ago
senna its jus better driver than schumi... u cant ccompare this 2 cars cuz of the diference of tecnologys in both cars. but SEnna its the best driver ever!!!
joseandres0212 7 months ago 2
the physical work senna was putting in!! and the car so nearly snatches away from him into the chicane
Hasselnorris 7 months ago
U CANT COMPARE THIS,,,,BOO-MACHER DID.NT TAKE HIS HANDS OFF THE WHEEL ONCE,FFS,HE SHUD OF DONE IT IN SENNA.S CAR,THEN WE,D SEE HOW SO-CALLED GOOD HE WAS,,,,,LONG LIVE AYRTON,,,,
theinoffkid 7 months ago
senna in the best.....we love senna....
eliseu7891 7 months ago
10 years in Formula 1 evolution is humungus big. In china, red bull beat the lap record owned by ferrari's V10 car from 2004, in 2004 the ferrari had around 1000hp, todays formula 1 cars have around 750hp, 250hp less! Now imagine the chassis and brake evolutions, not to mention the adrian newey genius at aerodynamics!
sorry for my bad english
RyckardPT 7 months ago
why this video have more than 1000 likes?? I mean, this comparison is completely nonsense. The Ferrari would be like 3 or 4 seconds faster anywhere, perhaps more.
NOTE: I am a Senna Fan.
RyckardPT 7 months ago
@RyckardPT but you can see that the laptimes are almost even, and senna has to work much harder , damn that was a bumpy ride, and almost as quick as Schumi.
whackyronu 7 months ago
never, 99 is slowmotion!!!
MrFreemon1 7 months ago
Any1 who knows or driven an old car compared to a new must know senna is better driver older models r like deathtraps. Lmao when he moved to williams for the gadgets they changed the rules. N i reckon shumacer would be a few titles light if senna lived.
EvilsOpposite 7 months ago
I haven't been a fan of F1 for a while, just got into it recently. However the fact that the lap times were that close to each other even when senna is using a 10 year old f1 car is astonishing, and shows the skill of Aryton Senna
gadaffi94 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When it comes to stuff like this you base them on facts all i have to say is MICHAEL SCHUMACHER 7 champion AYRTON SENNA 3 champion naw whos the best? it has to be MICHAEL SCHUMACHER , who cares if Senna died and he was good at the time of his death, aint my fault his dead =)
TheLynxPk 8 months ago
sorry but schumacher wouldn't have been schumacher if Senna didn't die. He's a good driver, no doubt, but he had the luck of not being a total beginner by the time Senna passed, as well as being the number 1 ferrari driver at Ferrari's very best cars (by comparison) ever. I even think Alain Prost was a far better driver than schumi.
CapoeiraPiper 8 months ago 2
@CapoeiraPiper And Benneton by the time Schumacher was their driver was suspected to be using forbiden electronical gadgets.
kriklan49 8 months ago
@kriklan49 it wasn't only suspected, but benetton was caught in 94 for having a higher fuel input valve than it was allowed to. Ayrton knew this and that they that they had traction control although that was never proven. That team was just dirty that year, it served them well receiving a 500,000 dollar fine.
CapoeiraPiper 8 months ago
@CapoeiraPiper Thanks for this info. Well, 500 grand, what is it for a F1 team? I think that F1 racing is a wonderful idea, but the FIA spoils it absolutely. Their regulatiuons and penalty decisions are just ridiculous. By the way, have you heard about the technical regulations for year 2013? They want the F1 to be more ECO.
If they want any motorsport to be Eco, why dont they just cancel the championship? The logic is almost the same.
kriklan49 8 months ago
@kriklan49 im right there with you. But since F1 is one of the primary forces of automotive evolution I see the sense in the in it. It's already brought so many automotive developments with restrictions and regulations anyways. I just hope they don't overdo it.
CapoeiraPiper 8 months ago
There are the Best Drivers in the History
dieguitopelusa 8 months ago
Michael Schumacher got to finish his career, while Senna was killed prematurely. Had Senna got to finish his career, it may have been a different story. Also, how would Senna have been in a car with todays technology. Senna is the best race car driver hands down. NO QUESTION ABOUT IT! Senna also had something else that Schumacher lacks... it's called CLASS....
ryapickinup 8 months ago
@ryapickinup Yep. No doubt about it SENNA WAS A CLASS ACT. the like of which we may not see again . Film out this friday, just cannot wait !
oneinamillion232 8 months ago
@ryapickinup I agree with you... Senna could've been a fantastic driver with the new F1 cars today, but for sure I'd say that he'd have been very bored and could've decided to retire very soon coz what he liked about F1 is the challenge... But, F1 is not challenging anymore is it?... It's like a play station set for professional drivers. That time was, as Senna said, pure driving.
dev83dfa 8 months ago
Comment removed
DesignArredamenti 8 months ago
Senna foreverrr....!!'
upilaronn 8 months ago
senna seemed to be bopping around a lot more than shoemaker. were the cars more rigid, less damping, or was the track bumpier?
ballickmoyler 8 months ago
Schumacher drives with precision and technical accuracy, Senna drove with his soul and a natural ability that I don't think we will ever see again ... Senna was one of a kind
Natas180 8 months ago
Senna no electronics...others...just robots....and at the end of the round they was at the same point...Put a today pilot on that old seat and i'll wait to see what he will do....if he will do something....
manico73 8 months ago
Senna is clearly the winner. To do laps within the tenth's o a second with a 10 year older car is amazing.
Zazquatch1 8 months ago
Senna finished a Race only with the 6th Gear. Schumacher does the same in a Grand Prix (Spa/Belgium). It´´s not a question who was better, it was other Technical standard. Today is Vettel No.1 and you can´´t say, that Senna was better than Vettel, because they never have a have a race against. Vettel won his first Race with a very slow car on heavy rain, that´´s the same like Senna.
Gintonik1980 8 months ago
erton keeps more of an inside line apart from that its stupid because of the age of the cars
waferthin99 8 months ago
Running on a rainy day with flat tires and win the race, only Senna same ...
Running with a car in the hands of any one serving to be tardy and still win the race (I'm
speaking of his first victory in Formula 1) only Senna same ... He's simply the best in sports today, and if he had not died in that accident, nor Schumacher
existed in the history of F1 ...
luizkim 8 months ago
With all my respect to Senna. Schumacher is the King. Just check Senna's comments.."I'm having a hard time keeping with this Kid..." Talking about a young and inexperience Schumacher with a Second Class Benneton!!!
adnoHis1 8 months ago
The commentator in this video forgot to mention that John Hugenholtz also designed Jarama in Madrid, Spain, which F1 also raced on for a time.
TheAntihero6212 8 months ago
senna drove a more challenging car nuff said....
dirtytrillionaire 8 months ago
Around sometime in 2006, I had an opportunity to chat with an Indy driver who drove formula 1 as well (he is retired now) and asked him if he considered Schumi as the greatest ever and he said, very close based on records, but he would give it to Senna just on talent.
sskgrs 8 months ago
@Legendary081 Why can't people just accept it's not possible to compare the two? Schumacher's prime and Senna's death overlapped. The sport evolved beyond all recognition in '98, and again in '01 because of the electronics and wheelbase - it became a different sport. Unfortunately, Schumacher's success in the car he created made the sport take step after step from 2004 to stop it being a straight race, just a manipulatively 'fair' chance to let the underdogs compete.
WhyGenFM3 8 months ago
@WhyGenFM3 Senna was chosen the best of all times from F1 as A.S sayd in 1993 "since now the cars are winning the Gps the drivers does not have to do anything!"
AGUIABDON 8 months ago
@Legendary081 and he drove a faster lairier car with less grip
cheshiregangsta 8 months ago
Ayrton was the only rider capable of winning that I saw a race in extremely adverse conditions. He does not always had the best car, he was not always the best team, the best technology. Can not count on a second pilot squire. For many, many times they played dirty with him, yet he never gave up. He won not only great world champions but also all the "Dark forces" the politics of F1. The strength of Ayrton was in your heart and your spirit.
gersonsmjr 8 months ago
We're seeing a guy with a car 10 years old who's still in times greater than or equal to a Legendary Schumacher's Ferrari!
Senna Forever!
ViniTuriniAzevedo 8 months ago
Sorry du'ds clear me? Senna drives a mechaniks speeds car and the other was automatic????.... no comparations senna drives anithing on everywherre...let's give he a chance... Ayrton The King of 80/90 and more...
chichonaked 8 months ago
Look how hard Senna is working in 1989 compared to Schumacher in 1999.... Formula 1 became too easy and less about the Driver and more about the car and its electronic gadgets.
djdavedoc 8 months ago
like a video games level skill choices:
Hardest = Senna (Gear manual/ No controls automatics/ phisicals 100%)
Normal
Amateur = Shumacher (Gear autmatic/ All controls automatics/ phisicals 50%)
Easy
marceloweckerle 8 months ago
Senna are and always wil be THE BEST ...real Driver on REAL race ( manual transmission ) FINISH .
echoesroll 8 months ago
@Legendary081 well to say senna would never lose against rosberg even at an age of 50 like you said is pure bullshit. i agree that schum. never had a top teammate, but senna also never had another great qualifier as teammate, beside the three races against the very young hakkinen (who wasn´t close to his prime time!) and hakkinen was closer to him than any other guy before and could beat him in his first qualifying! in the second race senna was only 0,1sec faster than hakkinen. regards sunnyAK
lemmik76 8 months ago
@lemmik76 Hakkinen beating Senna to pole was a one off result. Everyone has an off day !
oneinamillion232 8 months ago
Comment removed
lemmik76 8 months ago
Comment removed
lemmik76 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@oneinamillion232 they only were teammates for three races and hakkinen was far from his prime time! in the second race hakkinen again had almost the same time as senna. senna never had a really fast young guy in his team challing him beside the three races with hakkinen and there it was difficult for senna and he wasn´t that dominant in the qualifyings! sunnyak.forenworld.at
lemmik76 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hunt2727 is an ass! mocking Senna fans for not knowing thier facts then posts big lies to make schumi look better than he actually was!
Here's the truth so you know In 93 Scumi's ford was always 2 specs ahead of Senna's (condition under which Briatore allowed ford to sell engines to other teams fact!) Schumi's valve's where therefore pneumatic and Senna's spring loaded so schumi's max rpm was roughly 2000 more!
In 93 Senna won 5 shcu 1!
See who is better
kouzouka 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dont know who is better senna or schumacher but we can say that senna did not raced just whit good race driver, he raced whit the giants Mansell, Prost, Niki Lauda, Nelson Piquet... with a inferior Tolleman and Lotus wining races looking for gaps with no limits and no fear of death.
krayziegus 8 months ago
if u wanna compare then just look at the corners how senna speed up on then and how he catches shummy.
mattioliii 8 months ago
Two legends at the wheel of their finest machines.
ohargreaves 8 months ago
@Legendary081 yeah right, Senna wouldn't lose to Rosberg, but he did lose to Schumacher my friend!!
elmerhomerochingon 8 months ago
If Senna is so much Better, than lets Compare Schumacher from Suzuka 2004, against Sennas fastest Suzuka Lap of All Time, then we gonna see....
kallo182 9 months ago
Não da pra comparar um carro de 89 com um de 99 pela mor de Deus a diferença é gigante 89 o cambio ainda era manual e esse video só mostrou ainda mais a qualidade de senna ele é anos luz melhor que shumacher !!
william020786 9 months ago
one video from the same period it is fair not the formula of 1999 with one old car
psrost 9 months ago
Enjoy SEnna on board
youtube.com/watch?v=W1LGyPLgIkc
psrost 9 months ago
Wow, look at Senna's hands vs. Schumacher's hands... crazy. That's why I (personally) don't think Schumi's anywhere near as godlike as Senna.
Max Papis just tweeted this link, btw. lol
kornnut43 9 months ago
i think that senna was the fastest driver ever but if we look at the races...well..the best f1 driver is michael schumacher. numbers can show it...senna takes 65 poles but "only" 41 wins and 19 fastest laps....schumacher takes 68 poles ok but 91wins and 76 fl are impossible to beat
HavocTimeful 9 months ago
@HavocTimeful Schaumacher had so many wins, because Senna died to early. Besides, a good driver is recognized on the track, not on numbers. Nobody forgot that Senna with a inferior car, could do great things. In Donington in 1993, he made the 1st lap, from 5ft place to 1st place in four turns, in 1988 he made from 14th place to 4th in less than 4 laps, with a camel lotus, in 1993, Canada, he made form 8th to 3th in less than 2 laps. Senna was the greatest ever, and even Schumacher agreed...
MegaLandini 8 months ago
@MegaLandini i agree with you about senna's races but i grew up with schumacher's win and it was very exciting for me....i remember suzuka 2000, brasil 2006, usa 2003, china 2006, monaco 1997, spain, spa 1996 and many other...you've seen senna and think that he's the best as well as those who have seen jim clark thinks that he's the best....and maybe in the future people will think that vettel or hamilton are the strongest....times change.
HavocTimeful 8 months ago
Schumi is great, but Ayrton is the greatest ever. RIP
AlexeyfromMoscow1981 9 months ago
Wow... the braking in 1:33 by Senna is just tremendous.. imagine yourself holding that mclaren in that moment...
brian7becker 9 months ago
@Legendary081 and Rosberg is not a great driver in my opinion
psrost 9 months ago
1989 :Permanent racing facility
5.859 km (3.641 mi) and the Pole position
Time 1:38.041 -great driving
and in 1999 :Permanent racing facility
5.864 km (3.644 mi) Pole position
Time 1:37.470 . the technology will improve every day .
in 2001 5.859 the pole position lap 1:32.484!!
psrost 9 months ago
Who won?
KenfromDublin 9 months ago
Senna realy was the best driver all the times. when he died,he was in first place.
Senna won with manual cars while schumacher was driving automatic cars. no comparison....
amarildo1a 9 months ago
Why Senna's right hand always moves down? Is it gear, clutch or something? ( I have just got into F1, I know nothing about the history. )
bcwl64 9 months ago