that commercial proposition video sounded like it was an israeli company by the accent. so they cud have had that tech to use that day, as they know everything america does n has all its tech.
the reporter was very ept to ask them this question. who was she? where is she now, dead? and was her question pointed because she knew something and was hinting hey i know how u fucks did it, or was she stumbling randomly? anyone who knows please fill me in with info evidence thanks. im on the case. wud be nice if she knew n was patriotically hitting at them in a public forum, we know!
@SuperBandstand yeah possbile, possible. but every individual who got out there cam couldnt all be cia or mossad. theres got to be some people who thought, holy fuck check this out, i gotta get my cam this is history in the making. i know i would have if i lived there. and u can bet those tourists did, especially those weird orientals, japs love their foto! foto! so some gotta be real. and these videos show some interesting anaomalies. super weapons were used im sure. israel did.
TO ALL THE FAMILIES AFFECTED DIRECTLY BY THE ATTACKS, OR BY LOSING SOMEONE IN THE MILITARY, I AM SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS. GOD BLESS.
I WILL NEVER FORGET.
--->
WAIT: What is it that you will never forget: ... that your foregone conclusion is clearly conveyed by your operative adjective ATTACK; rather, it was an EVENT, whose actual factors are fully known, presently, only to those persons (clearly more than one person: that alone can be deemed FACT) whom perpetrated it.
Additionally, consider this u-tube series: MIT 3.60 | Lec 20a: Symmetry, Structure, Tensor Properties of Materials: lots of calculations and simulations were run. ... Thanks Dr Judy Wood, intriguing perspective, re DEW DUST TOWERS 9 11; nano-analysis.
REVIEW SERIES, re eg, nano-crystalline and quasi-crystalline structures, as per inert gas techniques for creation of nano-materials: preparation of nano-materials by divergent routes: see this Indian VID series on u-tube: Lec-3 Nano Crystalline Materials ... there are many illuminating relevant parts to this stellar series ..... Lec-17 Mechanical Alloying; Lec-16 Rapid Solidification Processing. Thanks Dr Wood, intriguing perspective, worthy, too, of nano-analysis.
@jusrag: So no, no moron here -- just another set of less than obvious but all so germane observations, re avarice, maniac racial superiority deeply seeded in a derivative religiosity mythos touted by a particular ilk of prognosticators, a fervent desires by same -- a cabal -- to exact GOLD in accord with the massively re-written PSALM 105: check eg, Bibles with pub dates to the 1950s verses any from more recent pub dates eg, the 2000s. Get educated ... the facts are readily available.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
I was just watching loose change again, and the plane that attacked the pentagon had an unusual piece of machinery that looked like a small turbine that was not destroyed in the fire and could not be accounted for. I wonder if it is an early prototype for the airborne laser system. Anyone know how to compare the videos to see if it has the right size and structure?
"the power of 1000 suns" hahahaha thats COMEDY!! yeah maybe the power of 1000 ice cubes! lol jk. but the flash before impact is obviously a bomb that went off dedinated by the terrorists in the plain. its obvious...
What you debunkers and willful idiots don't realize is that a laser target designator has been in existence since the 80's. The technology only advanced to the point that they could fit one on a very small observation platform. You now have a laser in the tip of a power point pen. Wake up, this is not the stone age sheeple. Everything proposed here is theoretically possible.
@Daddyo930 While something might be theoretically possible, that doesn't mean it's needed. The side of the towers was not built to withstand the impact of a jetliner going at high speeds.
@daexion Have you watched the History Channel's documentary about the World Trade Center and how it was constructed. In the video, the architects specifically designed the building to withstand several impacts of a commercial airliner. Don't ever try to make that argument here again unless you have the History Channel issue a correction first. Jesus H. Christ in a chicken basket, that was stupid!
@Daddyo930 It was designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 moving at about 200 MPH and lost in fog, not a jetliner moving nearly at max speed flown intentionally into the building. Leslie Robertson himself stated this is the case and he designed the building. Jesus H. Christ in a chicken basket, you are stupid. Don't ever make that argument here again.
@daexion Ok smart guy. Lets just analyze the speed of the objects that hit the building. Data provided by the NTSB, FEMA, NORAD and the flight data recorder have the speeds at 420 knots and 510 knots. It is physically impossible for commercial airliners to achieve that speed. Limiting factor 1. Engines were not designed to achieve that speed. Limiting factor 2. aircraft exceeding VMO experience structural failure every time. VMO limit of 767 is 320 knots. Starting to get the picture now?
@mikefan09 The truth is evident if we take a look at our ancient past. The same beings that existed in that time and caused all the trouble have never left. They are still here and you are part of their matrix. It's falling apart now, just like in the movie except the ending will be different. There will be no accommodation made for those who violate universal law.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered?
If there was no flight 77, please explain how 130+ witnesses reported seeing a plane?
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?
If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?
How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?
1. The first law of thermodynamics indicates that energy cannot be created or destroyed. What does this have to do with the collapse of the 3 buildings on 911?
2. How many pounds of force per second would it take to simulate the collapse on 911?
3. How come NIST didn't submit any of their simulations of the building collapse for peer review?
An increase in the internal energy of any system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings.
WTC 1, 2, & 7 ALL collapsed in the path of least resistance.
2nd question is so stupid. Do I include WTC 5, WTC 4, & WTC 6?
How's an entire "system" heated, thru a localised (small% of total area), conventional fire to give u the energy required?
FAIL "debunk" cole
Through a load-baring structure (rather than falling sidewards into empty air) is "path of LEAST resistance" now?
FAIL "debunk"
2nd question is a bit badly written, but it's FAR less "stupid" than u STILL lying that "witnesses reported SEEing a plane" a year AFTER I "pwnd" u that only around 40 said they SAW it.
"bolted connections" (He want's you to think "mechano"(LOL)
...You DO realise we are talking about BIG bolts don't you Cole, and WELDING, and CONCRETE...You DO understand we ARE talking about "cascading" (actually provably "blasting) PARTS, not one single mass ?( a diminishing percentage of the weight, which those "bolted connections" had been perfectly able to stop falling through themselves for decades).
"Aydan Kizildrgli, an English language student who is a native of Turkey, saw the jetliner bank slightly then strike a western wall of the huge five-sided building that is the headquarters of the nation's military. 'There was a big boom,' he said. 'Everybody was in shock. I turned around to the car behind me and yelled "Did you see that?" Nobody could believe it.'"
- "Bush Vows Retaliation for 'Evil Acts'." USA Today, 11 Sep 2001
@ctcole77 Homerbear46 "THRU a load-bearing structure rather than sideways into thin air, is "path of least resistance" Cole? ctcole77 "You are such a moron. The WTC would NEVER fall sidways". I didn't say ANYTHING about how the "WTC could fall sideways" Cole, why r u PRETENDING I did? I asked if its easier for a masses to fall thru a structure or air, I never mentioned ANYTHING that the masses have to stay in ONE PIECE, did I? Oh yeah. CTcole classic. When getting Pwnd badly. "strawman" XD
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane, an American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass & it came in screaming over my head. I felt an impact. The whole ground shook & the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
IF "thin air" happens to be 'sideways", is it not logical that individual "falling" pieces will tend to go in THAT direction (thus causing a "cascade"), rather than directly down THRU a LBring structure(in speeds 60% of going thru "thin air", a rate curiously TOTALLY consistent with contrd-demos)?
Was the general "moronic" point I was making,
Funny how u NEEDED to turn it into me claiming a Skyscraper should topple like a fucking tree.XD
So Fail on an attempt at "debunking" my answer to ur "debunking" of that guy's 2nd question, with a weak & easily revealed desperate strawman. & Failed to demonstrate ur definition of "POLR"
LIED again about those 40"witnesses"(something any reader can research)
Failed to respond to ur "engineer" boasts (again)
& failed to respond to- "How's an entire "system" heated, thru a localised (small% of total area), conventional fire to give u the energy required?"
In a desperate bid to avoid acknowledging he couldn't reply for 4 hours, after getting PWND for trying to use a retarded "strawman" yesterday...
& STILL unable to account for LYING that all 130 of his pentagon witnesses claimed to have "reported seeing a plane" in their Testimonies, when forced to face the FACT that most of them didn't..
Cole AGAIN uses the straw-man debate method (lying about what opponent has said)
of claiming Homer is calling ALL 130.."LIARS" ....
...ThUS Cole doesn't have to acknowledge the point HERE,
ether he intentionally LIES about the content of witness statements..or if he's just a fucking bitch the STILL hasn't been bothered to READ them
Cole THEN randomly throws in the name "Jason Bermas" (attack messenger ploy) and pretends Homer is calling "people" LIARS "without evidence" when infact he's using EVIDENCE (the actual CONTENT OF those witness testimonies, which anyone can research) to prove ctcole77 is a LIAR.
Cole THEN shows his butthurt about EVERYONE on YT (including his "debunker" friends), laughing their asses off about him being a copy-pasting moron that gets pwnd every day, using "evoke authority" ploy (a notoriously dangerous "shill"-ploy that most the smarter ones avoid) whenever he's getting pwnd...by pre-emtvley suggesting the reason he wont PROVE his claims, is cos "we both know" (*cos Cole's psychic now) that I will call him "a liar" despite what "evidence" he shows....
...Thus rather than show EVIDENCE, That he is a Top Engineer, cole is actually content to let someone he makes effort to argue with online, think he's a bullshitting fuckwit..
Cole of course could easily prove his claims...but thinks it's better not to try, incase the "moron" Homerbear, invents some ridiculous reason to not believe Cole's easily provable credentials, and all the Truthers will believe Homer cos they are morons too...
XD
YOU really don't see how PWND that excuse makes u look Cole?
..then a bit of classic ironic "narcissistic projection" about how "truthers" are "scared" real engineers don't believe in "magic theories"
(yep like "POLR being THRU structure", or "systems being heated by low amounts/area-percentages of heat, resulting in FAR greater "energy" than said heat would account for"..lol remember getting pwnd on BOTH those yesterday Cole?...na.. probably not..)
LOL...SO is THAT your answer to my FIRST question "why did you FEEL the NEED to tell Homer you was an engineer in the first place?"...because you hoped it would "scare" him.
Yep...THAT worked out WELL for you..LMFAO
AND IS THAT why u STILL lie (calling everyone a liar/idiot with NO evidence) that most of A&E for 9-11 truths 1600 members are "students"?
Is it cos you are SCARED that those REAL ENGINEERS don't agree with YOUR "magic theories"?
the only thing "we both know", IS how much Homerbear fuicking "pwns" U.
XD
CopyPasted SPAM questions that got answered in 2007-08 + bizarre nbility to recognise it +LIES+ avoidance of issues/refusal to answer simple question+ strawmen+unprovable boasts of credentials+getting pwnd EVERY time he tries to talk about "science".+ pwning himself with ironic hypocrisy EVERY time he gets dragged into typing a comment that isn't SPAM.
@ctcole77 ...Yep quite happy to explain Cole..unlike you I'm not "scared" of even *your* ..(I suspect.. someone gave you this *new* one, to try and help you out, cos it's the first time I've heard it from you) MOST "tricky" questions.
The easy, simple "explanation" Cole, is that you're LYING again AND trying to avoid answering any of my comments from last night where I destroyed your moron-science & got you to admit u were unable to prove ur made-up credentials...
.....The 'explanation" is again U r DESPERATLEY trying to gloss over ur HUMILIATION with a transparent combination of "attack messenger ploy" and "change subject".
The FACT that COLE uses misleading language "130 SAW a plane" (when it's provable only 40 of then even claim to have SEEN it)..doesn't NEED to be accounted for...Cole's actions DON'T need to be accounted for BY HIMSELF...No much safer to move it to the actions of people that arent here..
..again with MISLEADING language "ALL reject no flight 93" (in truth David R G has said a few things I don't like, Chandler's a person I've argued with a few times, so whatever, Steven E Jones I haven't heated mention it, and RG seems to avoid 77,93, or even PNAC and CIA ties to AQ compleatly..does that mean they "ALL reject AlQaeda ties to CIA" too Cole...cos they don't talk about them?..probably to you it does, and will be the backbone of your newest "question truthers are afraid of" LOL) .
...YOU are also showing your only "debunking source" nowadays is the wikipedia 9-11 conspiracy page. XD
SO..
The simple "Loose-Change Troofer" answer
"NONE of them "reject" the FACT there was NO plane at the Pentagon...it's just NOT their issue as THEY focus on the 100% structural impossibility of the "collapses" in NY",
The answer of a more experienced, cynical, sceptical "truther"...
Cos THEY are probably "management shills" themselves, (I know at ur strictly "1st level" pay-grade with the "play-dumb" ethos, it's impossible (like "remote detonation charges) for u to envisage that certain "truth-leaders" being pre-placed (a contingency plan for FAILURE of cover-up) "pied-pipers" for "movements" which can then be harnessed, & used to build evidence on "enemies".
.well trained in "disinfoist-debate-tactics" that are too smart to be drawn into "demanded complete solutions"
..ME?...I'd personally say the truth is somewhere in the middle Cole.
NOW YOU have to account for Wikipedioa's clear misinterpretations of 9-11CT..either find PROOF of ALL THREE of them actually "rejecting no flight77" (saying there WAS a plane at Pentagon) or apologise for your LIE here. and then maybe have another little crying fit....
THEN we'll talk about why you think your provable engineer-credentials will be so easily made to look "fake" by a "moron" enemy on Youtube, that you think it's just not worth proving them, but worth mentioning them..(& insisting that anyone who suspects they are MADE UP BULLSHIT by an over-compensation FOOL..is them-self the "moron") ... whenever you get....what was that word you used?...oh yes..."scared"
@homerbear46 ——————/´ ¯/) —————--/—-/ —————-/—-/ ———--/´¯/'--'/´¯`·_ ———-/'/--/—-/—--/¨¯\ ——--('(———- ¯~/'--') ———\————-'—--/ ———-'\'————_-·´ ————\———--( ————-\———--\ YOU WILL NEVER GET A NEW INVESTIGATION INTO 911!
@ctcole77 HAHAHA "Debunkernut debate tactic 27" When getting "pwnd", and are clearly getting upset.... try copy-pasting the text-pic of the bird-flip finger....but even fuck THAT up too.
911 TWOOFER DEBATE TACTIC # 1: When confronted by facts and science that debunks your magical theories simply claim everyone is lying while offering no refuting evidence.
"The easy, simple "explanation" Cole, is that you're LYING"
LOL...so I guess you COULDN'T actually find proof of SEJ,DRG,DC, etc saying they reject "no flt77" then?...cos that was what I asked you for...and I still don't see it.
XD I love how you can never remember the lies that lead to "truthers" calling u "a liar" & ur total inability to argue against them.. ridiculous LIES to make yourself look important, offer NO proof, ignore requests for proof, make excuses to avoid giving proof,
THEN PRETEND "troofer" HASn'T already proven you a fucking liar ,. like a retarded teenager with his fingers in his ears going "wa wa wa I cant hear you".. and continue to bitch about how they are just calling you a liar "unfairly" & with classic debunkernut narcissism, try to somehow warp, yourself pathetically pretending to be an engineer on YT ..into (LMFAO) "the truther being confronted by science and evidence" .....
I am simply employing the LOGIC of BASIC common-sense, & experience with bullshitters.
Accept nothing unless PROVEN
If someone keeps offering u ridiculous claims that have NO evidence eg "I AM an important engineer, but I don't want to prove it cos..(insert excuse)" OR keeps making statements that are clearly LIES eg "130 reported seeing a plane"(around 40 of 130 testimonies claim to have seen "plane")
The EASY, simple explanation IS that they ARE a fucking sperm-lipped, shit-chinned LIAR.
3 KSM (CIA asset, with plenty of fake "confessions" to his name) & Cole suddenly flipping from calling the Truthers a bunch of fringe kooks, to a Political Group that can demand shit. (call a grand-jury+demand complete solutions) Cole FAILS to answer for this hypocrisy OR KSM OBL's or AQs CIA background.
GO on Cole...CopyPaste another set of ur questions that truthers are absolutely terrified of.
@gell7 I know. I like letting them know that their time is almost up. Those fake ass jews who now occupy Israel will find out who the real jews are. I know that counter intelligence operations have been working overtime for the past ten years trying to keep a lid on this pressure cooker but it's too late. They should have spent a lot more money on suppressing information and they might have gotten away with it.
If the experimental lazer weapon around 4:00 has the power of 1,000 suns, wouldn't it have burned through the tower completely and possibly through anything else in its way?
@Born2Flesh There is some feces at the end of my digestive tract, sure, but there is it in yours too. Just because I have (like all humans) some unnecessary products of food in my rectum, doesn't mean that I'm wrong!
you people do realize that STEEL reinforced concrete has steel in it, that flash is from metal scrape. All you conspiracy theorists need to get a fucking life
@Born2Flesh Get a fucking clue? Give me some solid 150% proof that a fucking high powered Star Trek laser blew up the towers and then get back to me. Even if weaponized, a laser is a highly concentrated source of energy meaning... it can only go in a straight line meaning.... you would have a hole through both sides before the plane even hit. You would see perforation beforehand, go live in 3005 meatball.
Listen Dumbass..... Some people say there is evidence of laser targeting systems being used along with military drones. This would make it much easier for the drone to have locked on the target building. ...then their are others that say, a high energy weapon had to be used for the buildings to turn to dust. There were no large pieces of concrete found at ground zero, and the powdered concrete was everywhere. You're suppose to ask your government these questions, not me. DO RESEARCH.
You can clearly see the tip of the shadow at the center of the flash. The flash at the point of contact is a conversion of kinetic to heat energy on impact.
Ok first let me say that I work on around passenger airliners every day. I can say with 100% confidence there was nothing on the bottom of the first plane...it was painted like every other AA plane. It is nothing more than a white stripe. The bulge they claim to point out is where the landing gear goes. Second, this guy's entire reasoning behind his laser theory is the flash of light.
laser ignite's what they call "Nano-thermite spray" a substance used in demolition and is the reason for the "Heat signature" off the steele after the "Demolition" of the towers?
Ok, sooo nobody on the planes then, huh? (if guided missles) Then or course there was NO ONE in the buildings at the time, cos they all knew it was a set up. OOKKK... I see how the liberal-facist mind thinks. Besides PHOTOSHOP is a great tool of deception!!
@MoonlighZ09 LAsers dont leave behind Ballistics..and people know what C4 sounds and looks like and Smells like....they needed somonething more subtle..your being stupid and not thinking....
never heard of or seen a real laser? ...typical dumbass American. Youtube has videos on dumb Americans;you may already be on tape. lol ...you may also be in one of National Geographic's monkey studies. lol
...because large passenger planes aren't easy to fly into buildings at 500mph. The fact is, these were lasers used to pen point a target. Then, the drone/missle only had to fly towards the laser target.
@MoonlighZ09 because the steel frame of the building would crush the planes...therefore, in order for the planes to enter the building,the lasers were used just before impact. you dumbass whore
@MoonlighZ09 TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A TERRORIST ATTACK SUCCESSFUL WITHOUT GIVING AWAY THE HELP OF HIGHER POWERS, THAT IS, THE MUCH MORE CAPABLE TECH OF THE U.S.A.F COMMAND ECHELON CONSPIRATORS.
04/12/2007 NIST logged receipt of RFC from SJones, KRyan and RGage. This RFC doesn't contain the words molten metal or thermite or does it include SJones research, said to be "conclusive"
NIST contracted the NCSTAR1 report to ARA, SAIC and Boeing.
ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of DEW (directed energy weaponry)and are experts in psyops. SAIC sponsors DEPS(directed energy professionals society) Lockheed Martin also sponsors DPES. Norman Mineta was VP at Lockheed Martin.
The 1 reason why people refuse to believe their own government was in on this is because once they realize the truth then they'll be forced to do something about it.
BTW. lasers.. really? first it was holograms now lasers. this does nothing but hurt your credibility. stick to what can be proven.
Hate to rain on your parade TEUFEL, but there is not ONE well known scientific organization that agrees with the 9/11 conspiracy claims. In fact there are a dozen or more who have studied the "facts" and agree with the "official story". Like:
MIT,Purdue U,Columbia U,American Scientific,Popular Mechanics,Nat Geo,History Channel,NOVA,Implosion World Demolitions,American Society of Civil Engineers Etc...
@JLaw012 Its not a parade... Check out the video i sent you. Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center. Nano-thermite is in no way associated with passenger planes, i'm sure of that cuz i work on airframe/powerplants.
Unfortunately the fact is that if anyone from your list of scientific organizations chose to take the slightest difference of opinion about the official story, they would lose their job or lose tenure if @ a university.
1. Anyone with a modicum of common sense would not take this report seriously when the items they based this report on were given to them by residents of Lower Manhattan almost SIX YEARS after the Towers fell. These samples were not kept in sterile environments by any stretch of the imagination and were handled by ordinary, non-scientist New Yorkers.
@JLaw012 youre so full of shit! how much are you getting paid for calling people teufle? Yea buildings that are 1369 feet tall fall in 10,2 seconds and 9.6 seconds that's .09 second per floor through the greatest point of resistance.
@JLaw012 no, i don't believe in the laser weapon, but to think it was 19 hijackers is just as absurd. They cant make the Air Force stand down. They couldn't prevent an investigation for 2 years. Its pretty sad when they only spend 12 million on the 911 investigation and they spent 40 million on a jizz stain on a dress.
Who is "they" and who said they make the air force stand down? for once thing NO ONE knew the planes were going to be used as missiles and the transponders were turned off and thousands of planes are all along the east coast at that time so how are "they" going to find a few planes? THAT is absurd.
There were already real investigations going on, scientific ones done by NIST and the American Society of Civil Engineers which is one of highly acclaimed civilian engineer contractor in the world.
Please, you show some video that just says things without even showing the evidence of how they know it, what "facts" did it contain that prove the Rothchilds own everything?? how are they "in on it" you still have yet to prove anything. i can sit here all day and post videos. i guess when you're a brainless robot that all you can do.
Oh please you give me some stupid YouTube video from some unknown dude who does not even back up his own "facts" and you just buy it?? i asked you for specific evidence to prove they organizations are run by the rothchilds and evidence that the rothchilds even did anything on 9/11 and you can't prove ANY of it.
Bullshit, you are talking out of our ass right now. For one thing you have to prove the Rothchilds are "in on it" and for another thing you would have to prove that ALL of the organizations are owned by the Rothchilds. Can You do either or do you just like to regurgitate nonsense you hear online?
Right, they just go around posting blogs and websites and are on Arab national television, and teaching their hate in schools all across the world. You need to get your head out of the sand and stop being a typical ignorant American who thinks we don't have any enemies in this world who want to do us harm. it is all around you, yet you ignore it. Scientific organizations from all over and not ONE well known organization/magazine etc..supports the conspiracy theories, and especially this one.
WOW! and i thought this was a joke, then i see morons like You on here. I can't believe there are people that actually believe they shot the towers down with high powered LaZeRs. hahhhaaha.
well you probably dont know that last summer...pentagon realised a public document that said they were ready now to make a 767 with a laser weapon and without a pilot ....
and i say
really? not beforee 2009....maybe 2001 was the test of this technology?
So they shot the twin towers with lasers?? and the airplane was a figment of millions of new yorkers and the people on the planes are not actually missing. Oh wait, they flew the airplanes into the building, then shot a mega invisible laser at to knock it down......And WE are the ones who need to "wake up". hahaha
with the stupid statements that you say, i figure out that u have done 0 research on this topic, i will try to explain....what could happen
the planes were militar planes (they had a pod attached and a famous flash ocurred in both cases just before the explosion, (could be the laser), a very small fast drone was seen just after the plane crashed, the people probably was killed after the real plane landed in ohio, the famous fottage of atta was in portland airport ...ask yourself why ...
martyr, if you actually gullible enough buy into that stupid flare and drone nonsense then there is no real reason to talk to you. Lasers? and for what purpose in the end? to get involved in an unpopular war that cost billions of dollars....its just a bad conspiracy and you cannot even show evidence of ONE PERSON who you can Prove was "in on it".
@martyr2005 "with the stupid statements that you say, i figure out that u have done 0 research on this topic"
Classic no planer garbage. Call someone stupid or brainwashed, say they've done no research, then proceed to write poorly composed gibberish with ZERO supporting evidence. You probably also believe in the NWO, shapeshifting reptiles, and chemtrails.
the shadows touch then the flash occurs giving the appearance of no touch then the rest of the plane smashes into the goddamned motherfucking structure you fucking damnnutted pissballed cuntsucking dickchomping dumbasses!!!
may i say something... it was a horrible event and the fact you are exploiting such a horrible event is completely stupid and idiotic, not to mention disrespectful. there is no way that plane nor the other carrying 300+ people each would be able to house the machines and tech to fire a laser. and the flash was most likely the fucking tip of the plane hitting the goddamned building you motherfucking assholic bitch. I hope you get AIDS and H1N1.
so 3400+ people did not die in a screaming metal and fire death trap? was fucking david copperfield in town? hundreds of people did not jump to their deaths? are you actually so fucked up in ur head as to think our own government would kill thousands of innocent lives just to start a war? a war that has ruined the global economy, sent us into a recession, and claimed the lives of tens of thousands???
let me tell you about In Plane Site... if this man is so respected why does he not try to process the footage...? there are so many wonderful new technologies in that field that using only raw un processed footage is like telling someone where the sun is at in a snow blizzard...
and i don't know if you know ANY lawmakers or anyone in the government but I do and I can tell you that I have met some truly remarkable people in my life. A member of my ward is in government...
and he is one the most caring individuals i have ever met... if they were so heartless as you say then why would they even care about things like equal rights for women and african americans, minorities, or even religion? Why would the government even discuss moral (meaning humanic soul) issues like same sex marriage if they did not care. And please shut up about "Obama's New World Order" shit. That man has been handed a lot of shit that everyone expects him to clean up in the first year of...
his presidency. So when he proposes ways to get rid of the clutter and the problems in this country that is unlike what ohter presidents have done everyone automatically calls him a terrorist or a dictator, or worse... when you think about it, FDR made his "New Deals" which were unthinkable to the people at the time, but saved the american population from destruction. Because he did something outside of the normal rational thought... if we do not learn from our past, we are doomed in our future.
please, before you start saying things like "You have had a film pulled over your eyes" or "Obama will destroy this land" please actually listen to what I have said and not just start ranting again. NWO is just that, crap... It is not true, but Anti-Obama propaganda made by radicalistic men and women who fear any kind of change of their happy little bubbles and talk about how the aliens probed them in their beds at night...
the president is not in control you fuckin idiot - next you'll try and say that the federal reserve is a cool government bank out for the good of ol' uncle sam - yeeha - keep watchin the tv and believin it - Bin Laden did 9/11 too - what a genius crime lord - fbi knew zero about it til it happened , but an hour later he was named as the culprit - wow - great work - i've got some land on Uranus for sale - but the local prison population has devastated it
i do assume that you are an idiot because you are delusional. You are so wrapped up in your conspiracy theory that you yourself have been blinded to the truth. also, your random ravings about land on Uranus? Uranus is a gaseous giant and has no land to speak of. what sense was that supposed to make? the next i know you will be talking about hyper dimensional hexagons and how they lead to other galaxies, then I will you are a fool. If I listen to your point, doesn't that mean I try to understand?
if you think the nwo is not real google quotes of rockerfeller - he's very open about it coz he knows most people are fuckin idiots who won't even contemplate it being true and won't look into it - i.e. you
lmao!! who's the "president" then? don't even answer,,, i'm tired of dealing with you f*cktards, you act like you know something like some guy came to your place of employment and while you were filling his tank he let you in on the secret, where's your proof f*cktard? and don't give me a link to some google video that was written and produced by a 20 year old f*cktard who works at the same place you do,,, lol you guys have no brains at all
who controls the president? keep laughing dickhead - and Oswald shot JFK - read the patriot act and see what it means and ask would it have stopped anything? keep watchin the tv
@billybigrig10 Why all the anger? There are two kinds of people when it comes to 911. There are the one's with the intelligence and BRAINS to look at the evidence, and come to their own conclusions, Then there are people like you who blindly follow and believe everything the Government tell you. You need to look at the evidence before anyone can take you seriously. Just repeating the official government story is not enough.
Then there are morons like you that do not know that dozens of independent researchers have studied the facts behind 9/11 and there is NOT ONE well known scientific organization that agrees with the conspiracy theories.
MIT,Purdue U,Columbia U,Nat Geo,Popular Mechanics,American Scientific,Implosion World Demolitions,NOVA,American Society of Civil Engineers,History Channel Etc... All of them researched the facts and agree with the "official story" SCIENCE has spoken.
Rumsfeld is one of the biggest cunts that ever lived - lying inhuman - sold Saddam bio weapons and gave us aspartame and lies constantly - just listen to him rappin his shit - trying to pretend we don't have advanced weapons
tesla made particle beam a hundred years ago you fuckin muppet - and i didn't mention 9/11. The point was that Rumsfeld is a fuckin liar - perhaps you should research what tesla created and did - it's not top secret - you ignoramus sister fuckin paedo
Oh,and merlin.The so called arab hijackers you "know" where responsible.Well at least 6 of them have been tracked down,and are alive and well and living normal everyday lives and are at a loss as to how they are being accused of flying 747s into towers,
that commercial proposition video sounded like it was an israeli company by the accent. so they cud have had that tech to use that day, as they know everything america does n has all its tech.
mikefan09 1 month ago
the reporter was very ept to ask them this question. who was she? where is she now, dead? and was her question pointed because she knew something and was hinting hey i know how u fucks did it, or was she stumbling randomly? anyone who knows please fill me in with info evidence thanks. im on the case. wud be nice if she knew n was patriotically hitting at them in a public forum, we know!
mikefan09 1 month ago
all 911 footage is fake
SuperBandstand 3 months ago
@SuperBandstand how u figure?
mikefan09 1 month ago
@mikefan09 all the footage is cgi...i don t trust the imagery.mate
....
SuperBandstand 1 month ago
@SuperBandstand yeah possbile, possible. but every individual who got out there cam couldnt all be cia or mossad. theres got to be some people who thought, holy fuck check this out, i gotta get my cam this is history in the making. i know i would have if i lived there. and u can bet those tourists did, especially those weird orientals, japs love their foto! foto! so some gotta be real. and these videos show some interesting anaomalies. super weapons were used im sure. israel did.
mikefan09 1 month ago
FYI, re typical 9 II postings:
TO ALL THE FAMILIES AFFECTED DIRECTLY BY THE ATTACKS, OR BY LOSING SOMEONE IN THE MILITARY, I AM SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS. GOD BLESS.
I WILL NEVER FORGET.
--->
WAIT: What is it that you will never forget: ... that your foregone conclusion is clearly conveyed by your operative adjective ATTACK; rather, it was an EVENT, whose actual factors are fully known, presently, only to those persons (clearly more than one person: that alone can be deemed FACT) whom perpetrated it.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
Additionally, consider this u-tube series: MIT 3.60 | Lec 20a: Symmetry, Structure, Tensor Properties of Materials: lots of calculations and simulations were run. ... Thanks Dr Judy Wood, intriguing perspective, re DEW DUST TOWERS 9 11; nano-analysis.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
REVIEW SERIES, re eg, nano-crystalline and quasi-crystalline structures, as per inert gas techniques for creation of nano-materials: preparation of nano-materials by divergent routes: see this Indian VID series on u-tube: Lec-3 Nano Crystalline Materials ... there are many illuminating relevant parts to this stellar series ..... Lec-17 Mechanical Alloying; Lec-16 Rapid Solidification Processing. Thanks Dr Wood, intriguing perspective, worthy, too, of nano-analysis.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
@jusrag: So no, no moron here -- just another set of less than obvious but all so germane observations, re avarice, maniac racial superiority deeply seeded in a derivative religiosity mythos touted by a particular ilk of prognosticators, a fervent desires by same -- a cabal -- to exact GOLD in accord with the massively re-written PSALM 105: check eg, Bibles with pub dates to the 1950s verses any from more recent pub dates eg, the 2000s. Get educated ... the facts are readily available.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
@matbell Sorry about that. I was mad high.
Daddyo930 5 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
ctcole77 5 months ago
@matbell Was that a joke? The only thing funny around here is the way you look when your dancin.
Daddyo930 5 months ago
Comment removed
awkawk2011 6 months ago 2
I was just watching loose change again, and the plane that attacked the pentagon had an unusual piece of machinery that looked like a small turbine that was not destroyed in the fire and could not be accounted for. I wonder if it is an early prototype for the airborne laser system. Anyone know how to compare the videos to see if it has the right size and structure?
MrJDavidson 7 months ago
"the power of 1000 suns" hahahaha thats COMEDY!! yeah maybe the power of 1000 ice cubes! lol jk. but the flash before impact is obviously a bomb that went off dedinated by the terrorists in the plain. its obvious...
CartoonCharles 8 months ago
What you debunkers and willful idiots don't realize is that a laser target designator has been in existence since the 80's. The technology only advanced to the point that they could fit one on a very small observation platform. You now have a laser in the tip of a power point pen. Wake up, this is not the stone age sheeple. Everything proposed here is theoretically possible.
Daddyo930 8 months ago
@Daddyo930 While something might be theoretically possible, that doesn't mean it's needed. The side of the towers was not built to withstand the impact of a jetliner going at high speeds.
daexion 7 months ago
@daexion Have you watched the History Channel's documentary about the World Trade Center and how it was constructed. In the video, the architects specifically designed the building to withstand several impacts of a commercial airliner. Don't ever try to make that argument here again unless you have the History Channel issue a correction first. Jesus H. Christ in a chicken basket, that was stupid!
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@Daddyo930 It was designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 moving at about 200 MPH and lost in fog, not a jetliner moving nearly at max speed flown intentionally into the building. Leslie Robertson himself stated this is the case and he designed the building. Jesus H. Christ in a chicken basket, you are stupid. Don't ever make that argument here again.
daexion 7 months ago
@daexion Ok smart guy. Lets just analyze the speed of the objects that hit the building. Data provided by the NTSB, FEMA, NORAD and the flight data recorder have the speeds at 420 knots and 510 knots. It is physically impossible for commercial airliners to achieve that speed. Limiting factor 1. Engines were not designed to achieve that speed. Limiting factor 2. aircraft exceeding VMO experience structural failure every time. VMO limit of 767 is 320 knots. Starting to get the picture now?
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@Daddyo930 so what were those planes, purpose built military planes?
mikefan09 1 month ago
@mikefan09 Doesn't really matter. They were not commercial airliners therefore, the explanation of what happened on 911 is a lie.
Daddyo930 1 month ago
@Daddyo930 agreed, but we need the details to get closer to exactly who, how and why.
mikefan09 1 month ago
@mikefan09 The truth is evident if we take a look at our ancient past. The same beings that existed in that time and caused all the trouble have never left. They are still here and you are part of their matrix. It's falling apart now, just like in the movie except the ending will be different. There will be no accommodation made for those who violate universal law.
Daddyo930 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered?
If there was no flight 77, please explain how 130+ witnesses reported seeing a plane?
ctcole77 1 month ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?
How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?
If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 7 hours in advance?
ctcole77 1 month ago
@ctcole77 Moron. Tool.
Daddyo930 1 month ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?
If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?
How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?
ctcole77 1 month ago
@ctcole77 Your a fool.
Daddyo930 1 month ago
@ctcole77 3 QUESTIONS CTCOLE77 RUNS AWAY FROM:
1. The first law of thermodynamics indicates that energy cannot be created or destroyed. What does this have to do with the collapse of the 3 buildings on 911?
2. How many pounds of force per second would it take to simulate the collapse on 911?
3. How come NIST didn't submit any of their simulations of the building collapse for peer review?
Daddyo930 3 weeks ago
@Daddyo930
What's up gullible shill? Miss me yet?
An increase in the internal energy of any system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings.
WTC 1, 2, & 7 ALL collapsed in the path of least resistance.
2nd question is so stupid. Do I include WTC 5, WTC 4, & WTC 6?
Robert J. Martinuzzi, P.E., University of Calgary
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 3 weeks ago
@ctcole77
CAPS LOCKS MEAN "DEBUNKED"
XD
How's an entire "system" heated, thru a localised (small% of total area), conventional fire to give u the energy required?
FAIL "debunk" cole
Through a load-baring structure (rather than falling sidewards into empty air) is "path of LEAST resistance" now?
FAIL "debunk"
2nd question is a bit badly written, but it's FAR less "stupid" than u STILL lying that "witnesses reported SEEing a plane" a year AFTER I "pwnd" u that only around 40 said they SAW it.
XD
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
@ctcole77
THREE more questions CopyPasteCunt runs away from...
1 why did you tell me u was "an engineer" Cole? why did you feel the NEED to tell me your "job" during Youtube comment-thread arguments?
2, How do you find time do be this highly respected TOP egineer AND constantly spam old answered "questions" on Youtube?
3 How come you STILL can't (after a year of me asking u to)..prove ur "credentials" in ANY way?
Professor CopyPasteCole , Head of Cocksucking at SpunkyMouth University.
XD
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
@homerbear46
You are such a moron. The WTC would NEVER fall sidways. Bolted connections aren't anywhere near strong enough to do that.
130+ eyewitnesses, deal with it.
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
ctcole77 3 weeks ago
@ctcole77 LMFAO Yes I'm a "moron"...
And Ur the 'structural engineer"
"bolted connections" (He want's you to think "mechano"(LOL)
...You DO realise we are talking about BIG bolts don't you Cole, and WELDING, and CONCRETE...You DO understand we ARE talking about "cascading" (actually provably "blasting) PARTS, not one single mass ?( a diminishing percentage of the weight, which those "bolted connections" had been perfectly able to stop falling through themselves for decades).
Tick tock MORON.
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
COPYPASTE ANGRYCAPSLOCK COLE=BUTTHURT PROVEN LIES
XD
130 Pentagon Staff, Political Analysts and related 'contractors" gave testimonies of their account of that day.
around 40 said they saw plane/plane-damage/plane parts, the rest are statements of explosions, noises damage, evacuation etc...
READ those "testimonies" you fucking MORON
THEN
"deal with it"
XD
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
@homerbear46
"Aydan Kizildrgli, an English language student who is a native of Turkey, saw the jetliner bank slightly then strike a western wall of the huge five-sided building that is the headquarters of the nation's military. 'There was a big boom,' he said. 'Everybody was in shock. I turned around to the car behind me and yelled "Did you see that?" Nobody could believe it.'"
- "Bush Vows Retaliation for 'Evil Acts'." USA Today, 11 Sep 2001
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 3 weeks ago
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
@homerbear46
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane, an American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass & it came in screaming over my head. I felt an impact. The whole ground shook & the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 3 weeks ago
@ctcole77
I guess the word "sideways" confused u eh Cole?
IF "thin air" happens to be 'sideways", is it not logical that individual "falling" pieces will tend to go in THAT direction (thus causing a "cascade"), rather than directly down THRU a LBring structure(in speeds 60% of going thru "thin air", a rate curiously TOTALLY consistent with contrd-demos)?
Was the general "moronic" point I was making,
Funny how u NEEDED to turn it into me claiming a Skyscraper should topple like a fucking tree.XD
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
Summary 2/19/12
So Fail on an attempt at "debunking" my answer to ur "debunking" of that guy's 2nd question, with a weak & easily revealed desperate strawman. & Failed to demonstrate ur definition of "POLR"
LIED again about those 40"witnesses"(something any reader can research)
Failed to respond to ur "engineer" boasts (again)
& failed to respond to- "How's an entire "system" heated, thru a localised (small% of total area), conventional fire to give u the energy required?"
Goodnight cole.
XD
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
@homerbear46
Summary 2/19/12
unable to disprove ANY of the 130+ eyewitness accounts to flight 77
Oh wait, that's right, homerbear using the Jason Bermas debate method of calling everyone a liar without any evidence.
We both know you will still use you "liar liar" debate method no matter what I give you proving I am an engineer.
It really scares you that engineers don't believe 911 twoofer magical theories.
Planes + fuel + office combustibles like PAPER
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 3 weeks ago
@ctcole77 Bonus FAIL.
XD
In a desperate bid to avoid acknowledging he couldn't reply for 4 hours, after getting PWND for trying to use a retarded "strawman" yesterday...
& STILL unable to account for LYING that all 130 of his pentagon witnesses claimed to have "reported seeing a plane" in their Testimonies, when forced to face the FACT that most of them didn't..
Cole AGAIN uses the straw-man debate method (lying about what opponent has said)
of claiming Homer is calling ALL 130.."LIARS" ....
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
...ThUS Cole doesn't have to acknowledge the point HERE,
ether he intentionally LIES about the content of witness statements..or if he's just a fucking bitch the STILL hasn't been bothered to READ them
Cole THEN randomly throws in the name "Jason Bermas" (attack messenger ploy) and pretends Homer is calling "people" LIARS "without evidence" when infact he's using EVIDENCE (the actual CONTENT OF those witness testimonies, which anyone can research) to prove ctcole77 is a LIAR.
......
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
..
Cole THEN shows his butthurt about EVERYONE on YT (including his "debunker" friends), laughing their asses off about him being a copy-pasting moron that gets pwnd every day, using "evoke authority" ploy (a notoriously dangerous "shill"-ploy that most the smarter ones avoid) whenever he's getting pwnd...by pre-emtvley suggesting the reason he wont PROVE his claims, is cos "we both know" (*cos Cole's psychic now) that I will call him "a liar" despite what "evidence" he shows....
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
...Thus rather than show EVIDENCE, That he is a Top Engineer, cole is actually content to let someone he makes effort to argue with online, think he's a bullshitting fuckwit..
Cole of course could easily prove his claims...but thinks it's better not to try, incase the "moron" Homerbear, invents some ridiculous reason to not believe Cole's easily provable credentials, and all the Truthers will believe Homer cos they are morons too...
XD
YOU really don't see how PWND that excuse makes u look Cole?
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
..then a bit of classic ironic "narcissistic projection" about how "truthers" are "scared" real engineers don't believe in "magic theories"
(yep like "POLR being THRU structure", or "systems being heated by low amounts/area-percentages of heat, resulting in FAR greater "energy" than said heat would account for"..lol remember getting pwnd on BOTH those yesterday Cole?...na.. probably not..)
.....
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
..
LOL...SO is THAT your answer to my FIRST question "why did you FEEL the NEED to tell Homer you was an engineer in the first place?"...because you hoped it would "scare" him.
Yep...THAT worked out WELL for you..LMFAO
AND IS THAT why u STILL lie (calling everyone a liar/idiot with NO evidence) that most of A&E for 9-11 truths 1600 members are "students"?
Is it cos you are SCARED that those REAL ENGINEERS don't agree with YOUR "magic theories"?
Tick Tock
YES Cole, you DO pwn urself FOR us.
XD
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
LOL
why do u even try Cole?
the only thing "we both know", IS how much Homerbear fuicking "pwns" U.
XD
CopyPasted SPAM questions that got answered in 2007-08 + bizarre nbility to recognise it +LIES+ avoidance of issues/refusal to answer simple question+ strawmen+unprovable boasts of credentials+getting pwnd EVERY time he tries to talk about "science".+ pwning himself with ironic hypocrisy EVERY time he gets dragged into typing a comment that isn't SPAM.
CtCole77 = WELL and truly DEBUNKED.
XD
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
@homerbear46
Oh that's right, I almost forgot dumb ass shill.
Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, and David Chandler all reject "no flight 77" magical theories.
Please explain troll.
ctcole77 3 weeks ago
@ctcole77 ...Yep quite happy to explain Cole..unlike you I'm not "scared" of even *your* ..(I suspect.. someone gave you this *new* one, to try and help you out, cos it's the first time I've heard it from you) MOST "tricky" questions.
The easy, simple "explanation" Cole, is that you're LYING again AND trying to avoid answering any of my comments from last night where I destroyed your moron-science & got you to admit u were unable to prove ur made-up credentials...
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
.....The 'explanation" is again U r DESPERATLEY trying to gloss over ur HUMILIATION with a transparent combination of "attack messenger ploy" and "change subject".
The FACT that COLE uses misleading language "130 SAW a plane" (when it's provable only 40 of then even claim to have SEEN it)..doesn't NEED to be accounted for...Cole's actions DON'T need to be accounted for BY HIMSELF...No much safer to move it to the actions of people that arent here..
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
..again with MISLEADING language "ALL reject no flight 93" (in truth David R G has said a few things I don't like, Chandler's a person I've argued with a few times, so whatever, Steven E Jones I haven't heated mention it, and RG seems to avoid 77,93, or even PNAC and CIA ties to AQ compleatly..does that mean they "ALL reject AlQaeda ties to CIA" too Cole...cos they don't talk about them?..probably to you it does, and will be the backbone of your newest "question truthers are afraid of" LOL) .
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
...YOU are also showing your only "debunking source" nowadays is the wikipedia 9-11 conspiracy page. XD
SO..
The simple "Loose-Change Troofer" answer
"NONE of them "reject" the FACT there was NO plane at the Pentagon...it's just NOT their issue as THEY focus on the 100% structural impossibility of the "collapses" in NY",
...
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
..AND
The answer of a more experienced, cynical, sceptical "truther"...
Cos THEY are probably "management shills" themselves, (I know at ur strictly "1st level" pay-grade with the "play-dumb" ethos, it's impossible (like "remote detonation charges) for u to envisage that certain "truth-leaders" being pre-placed (a contingency plan for FAILURE of cover-up) "pied-pipers" for "movements" which can then be harnessed, & used to build evidence on "enemies".
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
.well trained in "disinfoist-debate-tactics" that are too smart to be drawn into "demanded complete solutions"
..ME?...I'd personally say the truth is somewhere in the middle Cole.
NOW YOU have to account for Wikipedioa's clear misinterpretations of 9-11CT..either find PROOF of ALL THREE of them actually "rejecting no flight77" (saying there WAS a plane at Pentagon) or apologise for your LIE here. and then maybe have another little crying fit....
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
...
THEN we'll talk about why you think your provable engineer-credentials will be so easily made to look "fake" by a "moron" enemy on Youtube, that you think it's just not worth proving them, but worth mentioning them..(& insisting that anyone who suspects they are MADE UP BULLSHIT by an over-compensation FOOL..is them-self the "moron") ... whenever you get....what was that word you used?...oh yes..."scared"
XD
LET's see the evidence please Mr Engineer Cole.
XD
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
ctcole77 3 weeks ago
@ctcole77 HAHAHA "Debunkernut debate tactic 27" When getting "pwnd", and are clearly getting upset.... try copy-pasting the text-pic of the bird-flip finger....but even fuck THAT up too.
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
homerbear46 2 weeks ago
@homerbear46
911 TWOOFER DEBATE TACTIC # 1: When confronted by facts and science that debunks your magical theories simply claim everyone is lying while offering no refuting evidence.
"The easy, simple "explanation" Cole, is that you're LYING"
911 was an OUTSIDE job!
ctcole77 3 weeks ago
@ctcole77
LOL...so I guess you COULDN'T actually find proof of SEJ,DRG,DC, etc saying they reject "no flt77" then?...cos that was what I asked you for...and I still don't see it.
XD I love how you can never remember the lies that lead to "truthers" calling u "a liar" & ur total inability to argue against them.. ridiculous LIES to make yourself look important, offer NO proof, ignore requests for proof, make excuses to avoid giving proof,
....
homerbear46 2 weeks ago
...
THEN PRETEND "troofer" HASn'T already proven you a fucking liar ,. like a retarded teenager with his fingers in his ears going "wa wa wa I cant hear you".. and continue to bitch about how they are just calling you a liar "unfairly" & with classic debunkernut narcissism, try to somehow warp, yourself pathetically pretending to be an engineer on YT ..into (LMFAO) "the truther being confronted by science and evidence" .....
XD
homerbear46 2 weeks ago
I am simply employing the LOGIC of BASIC common-sense, & experience with bullshitters.
Accept nothing unless PROVEN
If someone keeps offering u ridiculous claims that have NO evidence eg "I AM an important engineer, but I don't want to prove it cos..(insert excuse)" OR keeps making statements that are clearly LIES eg "130 reported seeing a plane"(around 40 of 130 testimonies claim to have seen "plane")
The EASY, simple explanation IS that they ARE a fucking sperm-lipped, shit-chinned LIAR.
XD
homerbear46 2 weeks ago
@ctcole77 PS Cole...ARE you going to LIE to everyone here that I haven't answered these questions this week?
Another question Cole probably wont answer.
XD
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
@ctcole77
1 Ctcole is "a top structural engineer" (aren't u Cole?...lulz)
But he doesn't know that any "unconventional" types of CDs exist, or remote detonators, and can't envisage ANY possibility of "sequenced charges"
2 same "playing dumb" required here to *forget* that "truthers" have suspicions we might NOT be talking about ordinary passenger aircraft.
....
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
@ctcole
3 KSM (CIA asset, with plenty of fake "confessions" to his name) & Cole suddenly flipping from calling the Truthers a bunch of fringe kooks, to a Political Group that can demand shit. (call a grand-jury+demand complete solutions) Cole FAILS to answer for this hypocrisy OR KSM OBL's or AQs CIA background.
GO on Cole...CopyPaste another set of ur questions that truthers are absolutely terrified of.
Yawwwn...
homerbear46 3 weeks ago
@Daddyo930 dont waste yur time wit thse debrunkers mosty paid by isreal with our tax dollar
gell7 6 months ago
@gell7 I know. I like letting them know that their time is almost up. Those fake ass jews who now occupy Israel will find out who the real jews are. I know that counter intelligence operations have been working overtime for the past ten years trying to keep a lid on this pressure cooker but it's too late. They should have spent a lot more money on suppressing information and they might have gotten away with it.
Daddyo930 6 months ago
If the experimental lazer weapon around 4:00 has the power of 1,000 suns, wouldn't it have burned through the tower completely and possibly through anything else in its way?
crypto144 8 months ago
@born2flesh and @jordanh614 zomg youtube fight whoop ass menz
TheEvilRaptor 10 months ago
there's no shadow NEXT TO A FLASH? must have been space lasers!
thezoombini 10 months ago
Lol!
Fact: when a very fast moving object hits something, light energy is created because of extreme temperatures in the collision point!
Video explaining this: watch?v=5j_c1tPMiG0
hypercub 1 year ago
You are sooo full of shit.
Born2Flesh 11 months ago
@Born2Flesh There is some feces at the end of my digestive tract, sure, but there is it in yours too. Just because I have (like all humans) some unnecessary products of food in my rectum, doesn't mean that I'm wrong!
hypercub 11 months ago
No, your greatest deposits are actually in your mouth and brain
Born2Flesh 11 months ago
it was a very fast terrorist with a box cutter?
lol still cant believe they did this... they did i know just cant believe it..
iTeaze888 1 year ago
rummy said they make weapons with the intention of not using them, wow!!!!!
oragami76 1 year ago
look into laser ignited thermite. this technology did exsist in 2001
MYAR15SaysImFree 1 year ago
you people do realize that STEEL reinforced concrete has steel in it, that flash is from metal scrape. All you conspiracy theorists need to get a fucking life
Jordanh614 1 year ago
@Jordanh614 metal scrapes?? before it actually hits..!!? Go back to sleep, nothing 2 see here.. zzz
TFaucheur 1 year ago
Go get a fucking clue.
Born2Flesh 11 months ago
@Born2Flesh Get a fucking clue? Give me some solid 150% proof that a fucking high powered Star Trek laser blew up the towers and then get back to me. Even if weaponized, a laser is a highly concentrated source of energy meaning... it can only go in a straight line meaning.... you would have a hole through both sides before the plane even hit. You would see perforation beforehand, go live in 3005 meatball.
Jordanh614 11 months ago
Listen Dumbass..... Some people say there is evidence of laser targeting systems being used along with military drones. This would make it much easier for the drone to have locked on the target building. ...then their are others that say, a high energy weapon had to be used for the buildings to turn to dust. There were no large pieces of concrete found at ground zero, and the powdered concrete was everywhere. You're suppose to ask your government these questions, not me. DO RESEARCH.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@Born2Flesh 30 year old commercial concrete turns to dust...... its designed to do so in case of collapse.... like i said, you're a fucking idiot.
Jordanh614 10 months ago
Who told you some bullshit like that? lol
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
I'll never accept you as my son, no matter what you or your mother says
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@Born2Flesh I bet you think UFO's are real too..... mongoloid
Jordanh614 10 months ago
what a dum person. he exposed everything.
Bf2MastersMaster 1 year ago
You can clearly see the tip of the shadow at the center of the flash. The flash at the point of contact is a conversion of kinetic to heat energy on impact.
templeofvesarius 1 year ago
Ok first let me say that I work on around passenger airliners every day. I can say with 100% confidence there was nothing on the bottom of the first plane...it was painted like every other AA plane. It is nothing more than a white stripe. The bulge they claim to point out is where the landing gear goes. Second, this guy's entire reasoning behind his laser theory is the flash of light.
templeofvesarius 1 year ago
laser ignite's what they call "Nano-thermite spray" a substance used in demolition and is the reason for the "Heat signature" off the steele after the "Demolition" of the towers?
ryderc69 1 year ago
3:04 NO MA'AM!
majstor037 1 year ago
ok, let's get this straight.. Do you REALLY need laser guidance, to see a freakin SKYSCRAPER? It was an airliner, not a unmanned missle.
MoonlighZ09 1 year ago
Ok, sooo nobody on the planes then, huh? (if guided missles) Then or course there was NO ONE in the buildings at the time, cos they all knew it was a set up. OOKKK... I see how the liberal-facist mind thinks. Besides PHOTOSHOP is a great tool of deception!!
MoonlighZ09 1 year ago
if i were going to crash a plane into a building WHY THE HECK WOULD I NEED A LASER WEAPON to blow a hole it it first?!?!?!
MoonlighZ09 1 year ago 15
@MoonlighZ09 watch?v=--_RGM4Abv8
JZJYRWO 1 year ago
@MoonlighZ09 the laser paints the target. Like a laser guided missile..... or remote control cargo plane laden with explosives.
louthleviathan 1 year ago
@MoonlighZ09 LAsers dont leave behind Ballistics..and people know what C4 sounds and looks like and Smells like....they needed somonething more subtle..your being stupid and not thinking....
rockdiga 1 year ago
@rockdiga
LOL, yeah, so they used a laser from the DeathStar.
Well, how could we dispute the logic of that?
Merlin5x5 1 year ago
never heard of or seen a real laser? ...typical dumbass American. Youtube has videos on dumb Americans;you may already be on tape. lol ...you may also be in one of National Geographic's monkey studies. lol
Born2Flesh 11 months ago
@MoonlighZ09 Because it is used as guidance and so the plane could penetrate far enough in to the building !
SgtB4RN3S 1 year ago
@MoonlighZ09 just a thought, maybee they made sure, by using lasers, that the plane/missile would penetrate better? :)
TFaucheur 1 year ago
...because large passenger planes aren't easy to fly into buildings at 500mph. The fact is, these were lasers used to pen point a target. Then, the drone/missle only had to fly towards the laser target.
Born2Flesh 11 months ago
@MoonlighZ09 to make sure that the plane does not explode at the wall without going deep into the building.
if it would not go inside there is no reason for the tower to collapse.
pimpgangstaboss 9 months ago
@pimpgangstaboss The plane didn't need a laser weapon to go deep into the building.
daexion 7 months ago
@MoonlighZ09 because the steel frame of the building would crush the planes...therefore, in order for the planes to enter the building,the lasers were used just before impact. you dumbass whore
awkawk2011 6 months ago
@MoonlighZ09 TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A TERRORIST ATTACK SUCCESSFUL WITHOUT GIVING AWAY THE HELP OF HIGHER POWERS, THAT IS, THE MUCH MORE CAPABLE TECH OF THE U.S.A.F COMMAND ECHELON CONSPIRATORS.
mikefan09 1 month ago
if you can make a laser weapon out of a dismantled dvd burner and a couple of small batteries, you know they have them big time.
DINGLEtheBERRY 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have never noticed that.. but i have always known it was the us goverment
WannaExpressYourSelf 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have never noticed that.. but i have always known it was the us goverment
WannaExpressYourSelf 1 year ago
Comment removed
WannaExpressYourSelf 1 year ago
SAIC has security contract at WTC site post 9/11.
Los Alamos is funded and supervised by the DOE(dept. of energy) It is a developer of DEW. SJones did post graduate work at Los Alamos.
Bob Bowman has a Phd in nuclear engineering and was director of the Star Wars program under Reagan.
Van Romero, a controlled demolitions expert from New Mexico Tech, has ties to Los Alamos, DPES and DOE.
SJones discredited CF(cold fusion) research done by Pons/Fleishman in the 80s. These facts are undeniable
babybluesnowden 2 years ago
04/12/2007 NIST logged receipt of RFC from SJones, KRyan and RGage. This RFC doesn't contain the words molten metal or thermite or does it include SJones research, said to be "conclusive"
NIST contracted the NCSTAR1 report to ARA, SAIC and Boeing.
ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of DEW (directed energy weaponry)and are experts in psyops. SAIC sponsors DEPS(directed energy professionals society) Lockheed Martin also sponsors DPES. Norman Mineta was VP at Lockheed Martin.
(cont)
babybluesnowden 2 years ago
why would any country want to do something so harmful to their own economy? This is international business.
you stupid stupid fuckin son of a bitch
BloodyFaceThompson 2 years ago
The 1 reason why people refuse to believe their own government was in on this is because once they realize the truth then they'll be forced to do something about it.
BTW. lasers.. really? first it was holograms now lasers. this does nothing but hurt your credibility. stick to what can be proven.
TEUFELHuNDEN420 2 years ago
Hate to rain on your parade TEUFEL, but there is not ONE well known scientific organization that agrees with the 9/11 conspiracy claims. In fact there are a dozen or more who have studied the "facts" and agree with the "official story". Like:
MIT,Purdue U,Columbia U,American Scientific,Popular Mechanics,Nat Geo,History Channel,NOVA,Implosion World Demolitions,American Society of Civil Engineers Etc...
JLaw012 2 years ago
@JLaw012 Its not a parade... Check out the video i sent you. Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center. Nano-thermite is in no way associated with passenger planes, i'm sure of that cuz i work on airframe/powerplants.
Unfortunately the fact is that if anyone from your list of scientific organizations chose to take the slightest difference of opinion about the official story, they would lose their job or lose tenure if @ a university.
TEUFELHuNDEN420 2 years ago
TEUFEL.
1. Anyone with a modicum of common sense would not take this report seriously when the items they based this report on were given to them by residents of Lower Manhattan almost SIX YEARS after the Towers fell. These samples were not kept in sterile environments by any stretch of the imagination and were handled by ordinary, non-scientist New Yorkers.
JLaw012 2 years ago
2. The paper also never actually says that material in question is nanothermite or even regular thermite...rather that...
These observations reminded us of nano-thermite fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and elsewhere.
You see they can't really get their hands on this nano stuff because we're not sure it really exists. Ok.
JLaw012 2 years ago
@JLaw012 youre so full of shit! how much are you getting paid for calling people teufle? Yea buildings that are 1369 feet tall fall in 10,2 seconds and 9.6 seconds that's .09 second per floor through the greatest point of resistance.
spikenation69 2 years ago
Oh i guess spikenation thinks that laser weapons is a much more logical explanation, hahaha good one...
JLaw012 2 years ago
@JLaw012 no, i don't believe in the laser weapon, but to think it was 19 hijackers is just as absurd. They cant make the Air Force stand down. They couldn't prevent an investigation for 2 years. Its pretty sad when they only spend 12 million on the 911 investigation and they spent 40 million on a jizz stain on a dress.
spikenation69 2 years ago
Who is "they" and who said they make the air force stand down? for once thing NO ONE knew the planes were going to be used as missiles and the transponders were turned off and thousands of planes are all along the east coast at that time so how are "they" going to find a few planes? THAT is absurd.
There were already real investigations going on, scientific ones done by NIST and the American Society of Civil Engineers which is one of highly acclaimed civilian engineer contractor in the world.
JLaw012 2 years ago
Please, you show some video that just says things without even showing the evidence of how they know it, what "facts" did it contain that prove the Rothchilds own everything?? how are they "in on it" you still have yet to prove anything. i can sit here all day and post videos. i guess when you're a brainless robot that all you can do.
JLaw012 2 years ago
Oh please you give me some stupid YouTube video from some unknown dude who does not even back up his own "facts" and you just buy it?? i asked you for specific evidence to prove they organizations are run by the rothchilds and evidence that the rothchilds even did anything on 9/11 and you can't prove ANY of it.
JLaw012 2 years ago
Bullshit, you are talking out of our ass right now. For one thing you have to prove the Rothchilds are "in on it" and for another thing you would have to prove that ALL of the organizations are owned by the Rothchilds. Can You do either or do you just like to regurgitate nonsense you hear online?
JLaw012 2 years ago
Right, they just go around posting blogs and websites and are on Arab national television, and teaching their hate in schools all across the world. You need to get your head out of the sand and stop being a typical ignorant American who thinks we don't have any enemies in this world who want to do us harm. it is all around you, yet you ignore it. Scientific organizations from all over and not ONE well known organization/magazine etc..supports the conspiracy theories, and especially this one.
JLaw012 2 years ago
WOW! and i thought this was a joke, then i see morons like You on here. I can't believe there are people that actually believe they shot the towers down with high powered LaZeRs. hahhhaaha.
JLaw012 2 years ago
well you probably dont know that last summer...pentagon realised a public document that said they were ready now to make a 767 with a laser weapon and without a pilot ....
and i say
really? not beforee 2009....maybe 2001 was the test of this technology?
come on guys wake up
martyr2005 2 years ago
So they shot the twin towers with lasers?? and the airplane was a figment of millions of new yorkers and the people on the planes are not actually missing. Oh wait, they flew the airplanes into the building, then shot a mega invisible laser at to knock it down......And WE are the ones who need to "wake up". hahaha
JLaw012 2 years ago
with the stupid statements that you say, i figure out that u have done 0 research on this topic, i will try to explain....what could happen
the planes were militar planes (they had a pod attached and a famous flash ocurred in both cases just before the explosion, (could be the laser), a very small fast drone was seen just after the plane crashed, the people probably was killed after the real plane landed in ohio, the famous fottage of atta was in portland airport ...ask yourself why ...
martyr2005 2 years ago
martyr, if you actually gullible enough buy into that stupid flare and drone nonsense then there is no real reason to talk to you. Lasers? and for what purpose in the end? to get involved in an unpopular war that cost billions of dollars....its just a bad conspiracy and you cannot even show evidence of ONE PERSON who you can Prove was "in on it".
JLaw012 2 years ago
By the way, show me the link to the "public document" the pentagon released with the information about the laser. Lets see it.
JLaw012 2 years ago
@martyr2005 "with the stupid statements that you say, i figure out that u have done 0 research on this topic"
Classic no planer garbage. Call someone stupid or brainwashed, say they've done no research, then proceed to write poorly composed gibberish with ZERO supporting evidence. You probably also believe in the NWO, shapeshifting reptiles, and chemtrails.
nobraintheory 2 years ago
the towers probably where shot so the plane could entry easiely and nobody would see that ....it wasnt a comercial plane
martyr2005 2 years ago
this guys a friggen lunatic
billybigrig10 2 years ago
ok then watch The Fall of the republic !!1
k1llum1nat 2 years ago
the shadows touch then the flash occurs giving the appearance of no touch then the rest of the plane smashes into the goddamned motherfucking structure you fucking damnnutted pissballed cuntsucking dickchomping dumbasses!!!
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
may i say something... it was a horrible event and the fact you are exploiting such a horrible event is completely stupid and idiotic, not to mention disrespectful. there is no way that plane nor the other carrying 300+ people each would be able to house the machines and tech to fire a laser. and the flash was most likely the fucking tip of the plane hitting the goddamned building you motherfucking assholic bitch. I hope you get AIDS and H1N1.
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
911 is the biggest lie EVER
k1llum1nat 2 years ago
so 3400+ people did not die in a screaming metal and fire death trap? was fucking david copperfield in town? hundreds of people did not jump to their deaths? are you actually so fucked up in ur head as to think our own government would kill thousands of innocent lives just to start a war? a war that has ruined the global economy, sent us into a recession, and claimed the lives of tens of thousands???
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
sad ,
the government has no empahty and sympathy ,
they don't care about humans lifes,...
and what we do...if we are poor or drug addict. yea it is sad. Please look for the Gerogia Guidestones here on YT.
Or watch In Plane Site ..research the NWOcrap
k1llum1nat 2 years ago
let me tell you about In Plane Site... if this man is so respected why does he not try to process the footage...? there are so many wonderful new technologies in that field that using only raw un processed footage is like telling someone where the sun is at in a snow blizzard...
and i don't know if you know ANY lawmakers or anyone in the government but I do and I can tell you that I have met some truly remarkable people in my life. A member of my ward is in government...
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
and he is one the most caring individuals i have ever met... if they were so heartless as you say then why would they even care about things like equal rights for women and african americans, minorities, or even religion? Why would the government even discuss moral (meaning humanic soul) issues like same sex marriage if they did not care. And please shut up about "Obama's New World Order" shit. That man has been handed a lot of shit that everyone expects him to clean up in the first year of...
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
his presidency. So when he proposes ways to get rid of the clutter and the problems in this country that is unlike what ohter presidents have done everyone automatically calls him a terrorist or a dictator, or worse... when you think about it, FDR made his "New Deals" which were unthinkable to the people at the time, but saved the american population from destruction. Because he did something outside of the normal rational thought... if we do not learn from our past, we are doomed in our future.
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
please, before you start saying things like "You have had a film pulled over your eyes" or "Obama will destroy this land" please actually listen to what I have said and not just start ranting again. NWO is just that, crap... It is not true, but Anti-Obama propaganda made by radicalistic men and women who fear any kind of change of their happy little bubbles and talk about how the aliens probed them in their beds at night...
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
the president is not in control you fuckin idiot - next you'll try and say that the federal reserve is a cool government bank out for the good of ol' uncle sam - yeeha - keep watchin the tv and believin it - Bin Laden did 9/11 too - what a genius crime lord - fbi knew zero about it til it happened , but an hour later he was named as the culprit - wow - great work - i've got some land on Uranus for sale - but the local prison population has devastated it
mooners40 2 years ago
please refrain from using such crude when trying to prove a point, otherwise people just see you as annoying...
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
i'm hurt - maybe you shouldn't call people names before listening to their points and assuming they're idiots - it's annoying
mooners40 2 years ago
i do assume that you are an idiot because you are delusional. You are so wrapped up in your conspiracy theory that you yourself have been blinded to the truth. also, your random ravings about land on Uranus? Uranus is a gaseous giant and has no land to speak of. what sense was that supposed to make? the next i know you will be talking about hyper dimensional hexagons and how they lead to other galaxies, then I will you are a fool. If I listen to your point, doesn't that mean I try to understand?
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
what conspiracy theory? and i was punning on your anus - devastated - as in what happens in prison - keep up, without viagra
mooners40 2 years ago
which is why no one takes what you say seriously, because you are such a fool.
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
watch?v=XRLPG_HplrA
if you think the nwo is not real google quotes of rockerfeller - he's very open about it coz he knows most people are fuckin idiots who won't even contemplate it being true and won't look into it - i.e. you
mooners40 2 years ago
lmao!! who's the "president" then? don't even answer,,, i'm tired of dealing with you f*cktards, you act like you know something like some guy came to your place of employment and while you were filling his tank he let you in on the secret, where's your proof f*cktard? and don't give me a link to some google video that was written and produced by a 20 year old f*cktard who works at the same place you do,,, lol you guys have no brains at all
billybigrig10 2 years ago
who controls the president? keep laughing dickhead - and Oswald shot JFK - read the patriot act and see what it means and ask would it have stopped anything? keep watchin the tv
poppy1963hotass 2 years ago
@billybigrig10 Why all the anger? There are two kinds of people when it comes to 911. There are the one's with the intelligence and BRAINS to look at the evidence, and come to their own conclusions, Then there are people like you who blindly follow and believe everything the Government tell you. You need to look at the evidence before anyone can take you seriously. Just repeating the official government story is not enough.
romeolou1952 2 years ago
Then there are morons like you that do not know that dozens of independent researchers have studied the facts behind 9/11 and there is NOT ONE well known scientific organization that agrees with the conspiracy theories.
MIT,Purdue U,Columbia U,Nat Geo,Popular Mechanics,American Scientific,Implosion World Demolitions,NOVA,American Society of Civil Engineers,History Channel Etc... All of them researched the facts and agree with the "official story" SCIENCE has spoken.
JLaw012 2 years ago
Rumsfeld is one of the biggest cunts that ever lived - lying inhuman - sold Saddam bio weapons and gave us aspartame and lies constantly - just listen to him rappin his shit - trying to pretend we don't have advanced weapons
mooners40 2 years ago
we have them, but they were not used on 9/11 dumbass motherfucker..
SakarianOutcast 2 years ago
tesla made particle beam a hundred years ago you fuckin muppet - and i didn't mention 9/11. The point was that Rumsfeld is a fuckin liar - perhaps you should research what tesla created and did - it's not top secret - you ignoramus sister fuckin paedo
mooners40 2 years ago
Funny how they show off this technology yet claim they couldn't use it to prevent 9/11.
giantgreenbuddy 2 years ago
this fuck is a fucking retard
3ryanandwendy 2 years ago
Oh,and merlin.The so called arab hijackers you "know" where responsible.Well at least 6 of them have been tracked down,and are alive and well and living normal everyday lives and are at a loss as to how they are being accused of flying 747s into towers,