Panda cloud antivirus is simply great but it needs to improve it have alo of errors like antivirus has stopped and they need to improve the real time protection an the alarm i doesn't come up sometimes when it detects something and they needs also to improve thier scanner
I really want to see how will the next vertion of cloud antivirus.
Agree with DJRull. No AV is %100. None. Missing one sample is not a miserable failure.
You're also not doing your credibility any favors by claiming to have a rootkit without any further testing or providing any data on further testing.
The problem with these amateur tests, is that many less experienced users will base their protection on these alone. Taken in context, a test with only 14 samples can be helpful, but take it with a grain of salt.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Symantec Endpoint Protection - also a free protection, works kind of like an Internet Security, no serial numbers, no trials.. u have it forever and thanks to it u have ur laptop forever :D
the best is Kaspersky Internet Security but its a pain in the ass when u install it the "pirate" way .. so im sticking with Symantec Endpoint Protection - i had one of those "your computer is infected.. bla bla bla.. and then it starts some fake scaning.. << Symantec Endpoint Protection cleaned this up!!!!
I would never trust an AV that relies on cloud detection. What if the servers are down? It would seem to me that you would be defenseless in that case.
Panda is so "slow" at informing you that a virus has been detected.....lol.
moneykidz1 2 years ago
Panda cloud antivirus is simply great but it needs to improve it have alo of errors like antivirus has stopped and they need to improve the real time protection an the alarm i doesn't come up sometimes when it detects something and they needs also to improve thier scanner
I really want to see how will the next vertion of cloud antivirus.
ahmeeeeeeeeeeeed 2 years ago
Comment removed
ajudaaduja 2 years ago
@ajudaaduja linux is shit.
MrBoiGuy 1 month ago
Agree with DJRull. No AV is %100. None. Missing one sample is not a miserable failure.
You're also not doing your credibility any favors by claiming to have a rootkit without any further testing or providing any data on further testing.
The problem with these amateur tests, is that many less experienced users will base their protection on these alone. Taken in context, a test with only 14 samples can be helpful, but take it with a grain of salt.
asyland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
panda has and will always be a failure... :(
FuzzyBanana92 2 years ago
You fail not the program. There are alot of malwares that other AV's can't find. Also how he failed so badly by only failing with 1 virus.
TheDJRull 2 years ago 2
Security Tool is the one that disables the desktop.
DjToronto4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Symantec Endpoint Protection - also a free protection, works kind of like an Internet Security, no serial numbers, no trials.. u have it forever and thanks to it u have ur laptop forever :D
the best is Kaspersky Internet Security but its a pain in the ass when u install it the "pirate" way .. so im sticking with Symantec Endpoint Protection - i had one of those "your computer is infected.. bla bla bla.. and then it starts some fake scaning.. << Symantec Endpoint Protection cleaned this up!!!!
SinistaBG 2 years ago
I would never trust an AV that relies on cloud detection. What if the servers are down? It would seem to me that you would be defenseless in that case.
Dch52548 2 years ago
what do you prefer as an alternative?
ms101289 2 years ago
Avast!, Avira Free, Microsoft Security Essentials
decodeman 2 years ago
I cannot beliebe that pcav is weaker than all of them -.-
ms101289 2 years ago
that was a fast review ;)
ms101289 2 years ago
Still the same Panda. Pooor, ineffective.
jossmartins 2 years ago