senna just took larger risks..which sometimes paid off, and sometimes did not, with this said Senna was definitely the most passionate and best at analyzing risks, but not the best technical driver
michael knew how to push his car to the limit at all times, squeezing the last bits of hp and torque out of his v10..he was an exceptional DRIVER
@TheChristianRose1 1 name better than the rest MICHEAL SCHUMACHER . the guy that was ALWAYS on the limit and he is unfairly called a cheat buy senna fans. and for all you senna fans look at 1990 suzuka grand prix. you dont ever hear people saying sennas a cheat do you and that time was far riskier than schumachers when it comes to delibratly crashing people out. you dont win 7 titles for nothing my freind. god help vettel when he gets that mercedes right lol
The fact is, Michael said himself he didn't deserve the title in 94. According to him it didn't count. That is why he went after the 7th, because in his mind he only had 5 at the time. He figured if he took 6 he would break Fangios record fair and square.
@dschmitt1010 incomplete info u r providing...complete schumi's statement u idiot! he said he didnt deserve the 94 title becoz he felt it was only ayrton's to take..he was the one who deserved it! see the respect in the guy for senna?? moron! it is quoted in his biography by james allen.. next time make sure u dont provide wit incomplete statement..
You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain, simple as that. If Schumacher quit after one or two Ferrari-championships, he would probably be just as respected as Senna. I'm not saying that Senna doesn't deserve the respect he has, he was great.
Haha, hilarious. Michael CHEATmacher the best ever? Anytime they make a poll to find out "Who's the best F1 driver of All-Time?", CHEATmacher nevers wins, huh? No one cares about his 91 wins --- we and the media all remember well how he got some of those. Not only is he Michael CHEATmacher, he's also Michael DIRTYmacher. Don't believe me? Watch his races (wins or losses) and you will see him sending people out of the road. If you don't like Senna, that's fine, but MS is NOT the best by far.
I hate the compare Senna versus Schumacher! Both are one of the greatest f1 Driver alltime! Than you can compare Tazio Nuvolari with Senna? Or all the greatest Rally-driver? Walter Röhrl? The 3 years of comparing was Senna was not better than Schumacher and Schumacher was not better than Senna!
look 1993 was an example and don't forget schumi in his carrer had very good cars and still the MP4/4 could be the best f1 car ever made but you can argue that senna was going against prost in 1988 which he haid the same car oh and prost they call him the professor for a reason.and other years like 1991 he won the championship but he struggled a lot against the williams and senna had for 2 years excellent cars at 88' and 89'
If you are not going to follow statistics then surely Senna is not the only one you should consider the best. What about Fangio, Clark, Stewart, Prost and many others I probably don't even know. Why would Senna be better then them if statistics are bullshit? Statistics are not 100% accurate but 7 titles of which 5 consecutive and 91 wins are not to be argued with. And if Senna would have lived it wouldnt matter much. He would have retired before 2000.
Senna was the best and i can explain it.Senna didn't had in his career good cars for example 1993.AND Senna was racong against prost,mansell and other very talented drivers
@MrRoadkillergtr Senna didn't have good cars? What about MP4/4, THE BEST F1 CAR EVER? Nevertheless, Schumi was fighting for the title in inferior cars for years... That's all I can tell you about your WRONG explanation. (I'm just wondering if the year 1993 was the only F1 season you ever saw...)
Man I think that only brazilians say "Senna is better,Sena has soul bla bla" his soul has gone to heaven while schumi was wining 94 championship.I'd like to say i'm brazilian but i think senna was a bit smug.
Even Schumacher admits Senna was better. HOWEVER, i only schumcher says this, because not to say that, would be an insult to Senna's memory. The Schumacher at his peak, and the Senna at his, would be very difficult to judge. Nobody knows who is better, so there is no point bickering about it. We know one thing however, its would be very very tight between them.
You can't say that shit!!! Shumacher is just a champion the Best of Champions ever is Ayrton Senna 1984-1994 (Dead for accident). Legen of F1 is Gilles Villeneuve 1977-1982 (Dead for Fatal Accident. His Cockpit ejected he T_T)
The epitome of the cheating, lying hypocrite. He could win 20 titles but so what? A terrible advert for 'sport', no shame in his cheating - it amazes me any one can be a fan of this guy.
Very strange. MS leads almost any record list in F1, but there are still idiots who say he isn't the best, that he won his WCs by cheating only. That's complete bullshit. First, in most of the cases where MS didn't play by the book, he got penalized. So, do you also say that Messi, Maradonna, Rummenige are bad players because they committed a foul, in the course of practicing the sport??? Second, how long would the list be of other drivers or teams having cheated??? The Schumy-haters r pathetic.
@joaquinveyron Toni Schumacher almost killed a man in the course of practising the sport ..search for Schumacher-Battiston in 1982...can you tell me pls what his penalty was?...i don't know, maybe it's in the name maybe Schumacher's stay in history for their ethics...humans forgive, history never.
(that is always the problem posting in a Schumachers video..you always have to explain)...toni schumacher was a good goalkeeper but he stayed in history as an unethical bad guy for his act against Battiston....better now?nobody remembers one of his savings but also nobody forgets this game against France.
@xpandia The fact that you have to explain yourselve has sth to do with your weirdness. Again, what has the Battiston-Toni Shumacher incident to do with Michael Schumacher, the greatest of the greatest??
Maybe, you should check your head. The problem with explaining things has to do with your head.
I dont think, clark or senna or schui should be compared, different times different tech in the cars and competition rules so YES they are all GREATS but all so unique to each others own era none will ever be know too be better then the other unless all put in the exact same car an race each other....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You said it. Schumacher is big but will never be the greatest. Schumi was just lucky to have an very reliable and fastest car on the track. When someone had a better car than him he didn't win. Senna did. 65 poles in 162 starts speaks clearly about how much he could get out of the car. Schumi is of course 68 poles of 250 starts. Very good also but it is far from Senna class.
Thats not true, schumi had win races with slow cars a lot of times. Think back to the years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000 and in my eyes 2003 too. And poles doesnt count so much. Senna had 65 poles, briliant, but only 41 victories. What happend to poles? Schumi had 68 poles but 91 victories. So Schumi doesnt need a pole to win a race like senna, so he can overtake during the race. So why does schumi is far from sennas class. Can you explain that?
Like I said before, MS drove in an era where the reability was huge, AS drove in an era where cars broke down all the time. 94-95 Benetton cheated with the fuel rig and anti-spin. 99 MH won but sure FIA tried to help Ferrari as they were driving with illegal barge-boards, they didn't even give them points deduction.
03 when MS came 8th at Hungary (lapped by FA). Ferrari complain to FIA (Michelin is too fast). FIA quickly goes out with a message, "Before the rule was that you measure the tire's width before the race, as of the next race, we measure the tire after the race". As a result, Michelin had 3 weeks in which to develop new tires. Of course it didn't went well and MS wins the championship.
@supersim2008 because senna died on track. simple as that. if schumacher were to go up in a ball of flames, no-one would argue of the best ever. sounds harsh, but senna's legend is boosted by the fact he died young...
@MrPhilsd Absolutely right. Schumacher's label as a 'cheat'... a rather failed, soft nudge in 97, a tactical stop in 2006 and whether he meant to or not, an impact in 94. People like to forget the Senna/Prost years. Suzuka in particular. We'll never know who was 'best' because the sport evolves too quickly to compare them of different generations.
@supersim2008 Let me explain this phenomenon. Senna could really push to extreme's, and hence was faster over some race distances than Schumacher. However, Schumacher, due to extreme levels of fitness and determination, could race faster than any of the others over a longer sustained period. Schumii did make some "mistakes" in his career, however, he himself would say now, that due to experience over the years, that Schumacher is now a better driver than before :) Msc x
@supersim2008 Senna won with the best car, also if with a teammate like prost... And rules gave more credits to the brazilian due to the final classification which considered only the best 11 results on the full championship... Without it in 1988 prost would got it...
Schumi won in 94-95 without the best car, and in 2000-04 made the difference with a car on the same level of top teams, except in a couple of years(02,04) where he dominated... After a bad season closed with a great 2006..
@Enri1989 What do you mean about 94-95! Especially 94! It was clear then and has been proven now that Bennetton cheated in 94 by using traction control, and then took out Damon Hill to win the championship! You also have to remember that reliability was a lot better in 2000-2004 than in the late 80's and early 90's.
@supersim2008 Read this article and remember the polls every year or every few years --- Senna has always won the "Best Driver in the History of F1". An award given by the media and former drivers (even those drivers that may have hated or disliked him) of all eras. Think about this: there's a difference between racing against an Alain Prost, Nelson Piquet, Nikki Lauda, Nigel Mansell, Gehard Berger, etc., than racing against Eddie Irvine, Rubens Barrichello, Montoya, Jacques Villeneuve, etc.
@ucchiu23 Not really my friend, Senna was a 3 time champion, by 2000 Schumi was a 3 time champion, that means he reached his sucess in 9 seasons, 8 seasons really because his debut season with Jordan was only the last few races of 91, you can hardly count that!
@supersim2008 Don't compare him with Senna. They are both the greatest if you ask me, but each one had a different style. We lost Ayrton unfairly when he was too young, having too much to offer. I'm afraid I can't explain this either..
@supersim2008 Ur calculation is irelevant. Think 65 poles in 10 years ? And think 68 poles 20 years ? Think competition for Senna back in 80's and 90's. And think Schumi driving and beating rookies during his time. Have good day. Senna is the best ever on skills, mind power, everything when it comes in speed. Schumi reflex reaction time was 0.311 milisec. Senna was the only one to get under 200 !. And done it 168 ! ! ! ! Analyze this capability please. No training can make u do that. Only God.
@burns985 absolutely silly your knowledge of F1 is very much evident when u value pole positions more than victory even going by your silly statement not being 1st while starting & then winning is still more creditable - Schumi - The Ultimate God of F1 - Senna a student of Schumi
@supersim2008 SEASON OF 93, SENNA with the worst car ever, wins 5 races, get´s in 2nd in the championship, only Prost (with FW15 C "A FREAKING ROCKET THAT DROVE ITSELF) SCHUMACHER HAD THE FACTORY FORD, MUCH FASTER THAN THE MCLAREN, SENNA WAS 2nd Schumacher was 4th, Schumacher had better engine (by far) and a better chassis (by far). So he couldn´t win Senna with a much better F1 and you think that he´s better?! there is a name for that..
@JONICRACHATLEITAO - Senna never drove an inferior car Schumi was leading Senna with his Benneton Ford which was no comparison to Senna's car . Schumi miles ahead of Senna
@multikannan100 Yes he did in 93.. watch "a season with mclaren".. it´s on youtube.. you are old enough, you watched in 93 like i did, if you were an F1 fan back then you would know.. The MP4/8 was much slower than the Benetton, wich had the Ford factory engine, whilste Mclaren. It had somethinh like 100hp less than the Benetton.. it´s a fact, don´t bend the truth to you will..
@JONICRACHATLEITAO - If u r serious then write to the respective co's to get the truth . Schumi's driving skills was is & shall always remain unmatched . The greatest drive possibly ever was when Schumi drove 40 laps in the Spanish grandprix when he was stuck up in the 5th gear .His skills are beyond compare
@multikannan100 I don´t need to, i told how to watch on youtube, and it was a knowned thing at the time, like you know today the RBR are superior on most tracks cuz they have better grip. And Senna won in Brasil with only 6th gear in 1991.. This conversation is useless. you seem to know very little about racing, or driving. And you twist the truth every single time,..
@JONICRACHATLEITAO But in 92 the Benetton was no match to the McLaren, and Schumacher finished his first full season infront of Senna. Why don't you mention that too?
The Benetton's engine was clearly underpowered, a Ford V8 was no match to McLaren's Honda V12 but still Michael managed to keep Senna behind him. Don't forget that too!
@ImFasterThanTheStig That is also not true.. In 92 they used 2 different evo´s of the Mclaren, the MP4/6B (2 first races) and MP4/7A(rest of the season). It was not a bad car, but it had many problems because it was still not fully developed.. That was the main reason, there were 7 retirements by Senna and still i was only 3 points behind Schumacher, although Schumacher had a probably slower car, it was more reliable and he could finish his races.Senna achieved 3 wins, Schumacher only 1.
@JONICRACHATLEITAO But once again, you forget to mention that Benetton also used their 91-version for the first races and that it was Michael's first full season in F1, so coming up with Senna having 2 more wins and therefore drawing conclusions is narrowminded.
@ImFasterThanTheStig Even so, Senna won 3 times and retired 7, Schumacher retired 4 and won 1.. Schumacher had a more relieble car, i just said that on last comment... That´s the relevant part.. Hello?'????? Jesus
@ImFasterThanTheStig The really relevant part is that everyboy as a right to an opinion, even if it´s a wrong one as yours is.. Go delight yourself watching the videos of Schumacher being a cheater with illegal fuel rigs, and tenth´s of other situations, and throwing hundreds of thousands of fans away from F1.. It was a dark time for F1. Schumacher is a great driver, bottom line Senna was much better in all aspects..
1. Ayrton Senna always had the best cars to win his titles. Michael won two Championships in a Benetton that was equal at best to the Williams in 94 and inferior in 95. Michael then went to a team that hadn't won a single championship since 1979. With his input and work and the guys he brought to Ferrari, he turned them into a Championship winning team. So, 1-0 for Michael.
2. As it would be unfair to take all of Schumachers career seasons to compare him with Senna, I will take his first complete ten seasons, as well as Sennas complete seasons (which were ten aswell). In that time, Schumacher scored 4 WDC, 53 wins and 43 poles, while having inferior cars for 7 of those ten years. Senna scored 3 WDC, 41 Wins and 62 Poles in the same amount of time, having inferior cars for 6 years. 2-0 for Schumacher.
@JONICRACHATLEITAO (3/4) Schumacher is often regarded as being a cheater, but if you go into the details, you might see that Senna's unfair moves throughout his career have been much more dangerous, Senna, torpedoing into Prost at 150 mph out of spite, risking the death or serious maiming to a fellow driver, Senna almost smashed Prost against the wall in Estoril 88 too, Senna dirty against Mansell in Monaco 92, we have seen fatal accidents in similar circumstances... so, no difference here.
@ImFasterThanTheStig Yes they are my friend, all that i´ve said are facts, you are completly accurate,, Senna was and always will be the best, the most dedicated, the most courageous, and most definitly the fastest ever..actually that´s even the opinion of someone you might know, schumacher himself, as well as almost every single f1 drivers..
@JONICRACHATLEITAO The most dedicated? And what about Spain 94, or Hungary 98? Most courageous? Like torpedoing into Prost at 150mph or pushing him into the wall? The fastest? Senna, for example, had only 11% of fastest lap, while Schumi has 30%. In every other discussion people would laugh at you for the lack of facts and the overwhelming place you put down for you own opinion and favouritism. And besides that, do you really think Michael would mention himself as the best ever, while ...
@JONICRACHATLEITAO ... some people made a film about Sennas life and asked him for an interview? If he would have refused to do an interview, people like you would jump on that, if he would mention himself as the best ever, people like you would jump on him. You must be pretty naive to think an F1-driver of his calibre doesn't think about himself as being the best (and he has every right to do so).
@ImFasterThanTheStig What are you talking about?!!! You are in denial, and obviously have problems of interpretation.. You are talking about a movie that came out a year ago, i´m talking about interviews wich are 10 years old.. But i really do not want to discuss with someone that as no arguments, like you. Besides this conversation is completly useless with people like you.. Heil Schumacher the cheating nazi prick.
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Oh boy, sit down and look at my last posts. Clearly, I am the one with the arguments and facts, when I came up with plenty of them, you just repeated your opinion. And you seriously call that a discussion?
Besides that, the "Nazi-move" is commonly known on the net already, it's basically a pre-chewed-Daily-Mail-level-thought-terminating-cliché to express your helpless situation in a discussion based on facts. It's so old, and dull to come up with that, but it proves that...
@ImFasterThanTheStig I thin you hould read again what i wrote, those are facts, i need no arguments beacuse there are facts.. You really need either glasses or reading lessons. About the rest, grow up... Schumacher was and is a cheating driver who only the germans liked, wich lead to a dark era on F1. The schumacher era, not interesting or exciting at all... So if your conversation is based on ignoring facts and say that i have no arguments, your dumb as brick.
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Lol, one more thing: "Schumacher was and is a cheating driver who only the germans liked, wich lead to a dark era on F1. The schumacher era, not interesting or exciting at all"
Haha. Good one. Dark era of F1.... sounds scary, I can hear some Edgar-Wallace movie-intro in the background....
And of course, the fact that Michael totally humiliated the rest of the field is something which makes him worse than Senna, lol.
@ImFasterThanTheStig HAHAHA, that was hilarious.. You should learn about something in order to talk about it, you really know very little about F1. Bye little kid, keep talking to yourself.
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Senna with the worst car ever? I don't know the exact term for you illness, but such a sentence is simply ridiculous. In fact, Senna had only decent or by far the best cars, that's what he was looking for, like in 92, he wanted to leave McLaren immediately when not being given the best car to drive. It must hurt you hard-bitten Senna fans, that Michael achieved something Ayrton never did: Winnig World Championships with inferior cars.
@ImFasterThanTheStig It´s very clear that you are a kid, even more a german kid who like´s schumacher.. That doesn´t make him the best for how much it hurts coming up your ass... Learn a bit about f1 and racing, and then come and comment..
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Well, first of all I am not a kid and also not a german, but geography is not your biggest strength, right?
Anyway, I think your latest outburst shows how it must have hurt you seeing Michael desoying and humiliating British teams and drivers, and winning Titles with inferior cars, slowly breaking every record holy Senna has achieved. Have a nice day! :-)
@ImFasterThanTheStig Ok, Austria, Hitlers country... And you should learn more of f1, Senna eon Monaco 6 times, schumacher didn´t.. Fucke head, so that means not every record was broken. You wouldn´t be talking your mouth if he had continued racing...
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Schumacher won 5 times at Monaco. In 2000 he was leading the race convincingly, when his car broke down. In 2004 Montoya crashed into him, when MSC was in the lead.
Clearly, it is not me having little knowledge, but the one who is repeating it although his opponent has the facts. But maybe you didn't know all those things because it was so dark at Schumachers time, that you couldn't see how the races developed... hilarious.
@ImFasterThanTheStig I think 6 is a bigger number than 5.. You reckon? you must be as dumb as a freaking door, if 6 is bigger than 5, who has the record? Schumacher?!!!! That is the fact you tool.. and yes, you have little knowledge about F1, also a very visible fact,.
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Ok, so after 4 hours we found one thing where Ayrton had more success than Michael, despite Michael loosing on that one for bad luck.
Good overall results in terms of who's the best ever I would say.
@ImFasterThanTheStig Senna was better in all aspects, Schumacher just lived longer.. You really want to compare the turbo era (Senna´s first seasons) with schumacher´s first seasons? Don´t be ridiculous.. There was not 1 championship that he won that wasn´t controversial, if not hitting Hill, using illegal tyres, illegal fuel rigs, illegal wings, trying to the same to villeneuve that he had done to Hill, amongst some many other things. Schumacher is the most successfull, but not the best.
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Ok, that's why I took Michaels first ten years, so to make it more fair. And he's still better. The facts are speaking for Michael, but I've already noticed you don't care about facts, you rather call someone names or claim he has no clue. Childish.
And as far as I can remember, he didn't win the WDC in 97, so no point in coming up with that. The only controversial Championship was in 1994, so Michael had one controversial title, Senna had one in 1990. Another fact.
@JONICRACHATLEITAO 1995 he won although having an inferior car, 2000 he had, at best, a car that was equal to the McLarens in terms of speed. From 2001-2004 he won 4 more Championships with having the best car on the grid (not in 2003 though), so finally he got rewarded for going to a team that hasn't won titles for years, and finally he got rewarded for struggling with the crap Ferrari delivered for him in the first years. Justice, that's how I would call his domination-years.
@JONICRACHATLEITAO At the end of the day, Michael, despite being the best driver ever and the most succesfull one, never acted in a way where he would let people feel that he was the best, like Senna did.
The only thing Michael wants nowadays, is to be treated fair. And scum like you is not even willing to accept that. You are a disgrace for your country. And, more importantly, Senna would turn his back on you reading some stuff you already wrote down today. If Senna fans are represented ...
Ferrari did have the best car around that era. but Michael was a purely talented driver. hope he gets a good car in 2011. bet then he will be winning some races again, like the good ol days.
Its because nobody agreees he was the best = we all know he just had the best cars and team orders - he was slightly above average thats all. The master of them all was THE SENNA!
why does this video have so many thumbs down? it rocks!
NeoStrike1 2 months ago
@NeoStrike1 because it's not a video it's a slide show.... this is youtube bro...
carlosmoya83 5 days ago
Awful video.
psychocyberdisc 2 months ago
cant compare senna and schumacher,apples and oranges
schumacher-brilliant driver,
senna - brilliant driver
nuff said
formula1ondvd 2 months ago in playlist Michael schuhmacher
SCHUMACHER THE ALIVE LEGEND !!!
MegaSpiritlight 3 months ago
senna just took larger risks..which sometimes paid off, and sometimes did not, with this said Senna was definitely the most passionate and best at analyzing risks, but not the best technical driver
michael knew how to push his car to the limit at all times, squeezing the last bits of hp and torque out of his v10..he was an exceptional DRIVER
yagfob1 3 months ago 8
i see all 4 drivers... all are very good drivers... but schumi has the most titels etc... so he is the successful driver of all
fancyfranzi87 3 months ago
have you ever seen AYRTON SENNA drive??
gianzely 3 months ago
Fangio, Clark or Senna could never compete at the speeds Schumacher has, no way
bradst91 3 months ago
3 names. All 3 better than Schumacher.
Fangio
Jim Clark
Ayrton Senna
TheChristianRose1 3 months ago
@TheChristianRose1 1 name better than the rest MICHEAL SCHUMACHER . the guy that was ALWAYS on the limit and he is unfairly called a cheat buy senna fans. and for all you senna fans look at 1990 suzuka grand prix. you dont ever hear people saying sennas a cheat do you and that time was far riskier than schumachers when it comes to delibratly crashing people out. you dont win 7 titles for nothing my freind. god help vettel when he gets that mercedes right lol
jfzclips 3 months ago
The fact is, Michael said himself he didn't deserve the title in 94. According to him it didn't count. That is why he went after the 7th, because in his mind he only had 5 at the time. He figured if he took 6 he would break Fangios record fair and square.
dschmitt1010 3 months ago
@dschmitt1010 How about 98 & 06? & 99...
& where did Michael say it? Send us the link.
In 94, they suspended him for 2 races to advance Hill, but it still didn't work!
MSC is the best of the best, as the title says!
ilksen2010 3 months ago 3
@dschmitt1010 incomplete info u r providing...complete schumi's statement u idiot! he said he didnt deserve the 94 title becoz he felt it was only ayrton's to take..he was the one who deserved it! see the respect in the guy for senna?? moron! it is quoted in his biography by james allen.. next time make sure u dont provide wit incomplete statement..
ayansomvanshi 3 months ago
The best ever? I say Fangio.
tommykl 4 months ago
You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain, simple as that. If Schumacher quit after one or two Ferrari-championships, he would probably be just as respected as Senna. I'm not saying that Senna doesn't deserve the respect he has, he was great.
skeetskeet4lyfe 4 months ago 2
Schumi and Senna are two greatest drivers in f1 history! they are so different drivers, that comparing both of them is sick
zzracer 5 months ago
HONKY!!!!!!! MR PROLIFIC!!!!!!!
mrmikespence1964 5 months ago
@Enri1989 I believe Herbert won the British GP in 95? Schumacher only won in 94 because his team cheated, and he knew!
TheChristianRose1 6 months ago
er ist einfach der beste und wird es auch immer bleiben
passatfan94 6 months ago
Haha, hilarious. Michael CHEATmacher the best ever? Anytime they make a poll to find out "Who's the best F1 driver of All-Time?", CHEATmacher nevers wins, huh? No one cares about his 91 wins --- we and the media all remember well how he got some of those. Not only is he Michael CHEATmacher, he's also Michael DIRTYmacher. Don't believe me? Watch his races (wins or losses) and you will see him sending people out of the road. If you don't like Senna, that's fine, but MS is NOT the best by far.
gusandsummer 6 months ago
I hate the compare Senna versus Schumacher! Both are one of the greatest f1 Driver alltime! Than you can compare Tazio Nuvolari with Senna? Or all the greatest Rally-driver? Walter Röhrl? The 3 years of comparing was Senna was not better than Schumacher and Schumacher was not better than Senna!
samothsamothsamoth 6 months ago
Im pretty sure he drives cars not ride cars
teamlotusGP 6 months ago
The Song is: ACDC You Shook me all night long.
Schumi is the best.
86Vili86 7 months ago
what is the song called
wuschkee 7 months ago
by the way GREAT VID!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MrRoadkillergtr 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
look 1993 was an example and don't forget schumi in his carrer had very good cars and still the MP4/4 could be the best f1 car ever made but you can argue that senna was going against prost in 1988 which he haid the same car oh and prost they call him the professor for a reason.and other years like 1991 he won the championship but he struggled a lot against the williams and senna had for 2 years excellent cars at 88' and 89'
MrRoadkillergtr 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrRoadkillergtr 7 months ago
I always enjoy looking at pictures on a VIDEO site. -_-
Preferably dubbed with some unfitting tune.
XeroNXS 8 months ago
If you are not going to follow statistics then surely Senna is not the only one you should consider the best. What about Fangio, Clark, Stewart, Prost and many others I probably don't even know. Why would Senna be better then them if statistics are bullshit? Statistics are not 100% accurate but 7 titles of which 5 consecutive and 91 wins are not to be argued with. And if Senna would have lived it wouldnt matter much. He would have retired before 2000.
philateliceun 9 months ago
Senna was the best and i can explain it.Senna didn't had in his career good cars for example 1993.AND Senna was racong against prost,mansell and other very talented drivers
MrRoadkillergtr 10 months ago
@MrRoadkillergtr Senna didn't have good cars? What about MP4/4, THE BEST F1 CAR EVER? Nevertheless, Schumi was fighting for the title in inferior cars for years... That's all I can tell you about your WRONG explanation. (I'm just wondering if the year 1993 was the only F1 season you ever saw...)
racemise 8 months ago
Man I think that only brazilians say "Senna is better,Sena has soul bla bla" his soul has gone to heaven while schumi was wining 94 championship.I'd like to say i'm brazilian but i think senna was a bit smug.
Arthurzeiro 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
0:01 drinks Red Bull, doesn't he? so funny : D
yasuhirogt4 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
0:01 drinks Red Bull, doesn't he? so funny : D
yasuhirogt4 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
0:01 He drinks Red Bull, doesn't it? hahaha : D
yasuhirogt4 11 months ago
Comment removed
yasuhirogt4 11 months ago
Even Schumacher admits Senna was better. HOWEVER, i only schumcher says this, because not to say that, would be an insult to Senna's memory. The Schumacher at his peak, and the Senna at his, would be very difficult to judge. Nobody knows who is better, so there is no point bickering about it. We know one thing however, its would be very very tight between them.
Phoenix1664 1 year ago 3
A Genius forms a Great Legend = Michael Schumacher
drejtim111 1 year ago
Shcumacher = Biggest Cheat in the sport!!!!
MrSymon68 1 year ago
Schummi is the best, but after a slideshow from 3:33 min, I'm still waiting for that promised video
Woutah2dmaX 1 year ago
Ferrari is the best car. Senna is the best driver. Just do it.
Maverick370 1 year ago
You can't say that shit!!! Shumacher is just a champion the Best of Champions ever is Ayrton Senna 1984-1994 (Dead for accident). Legen of F1 is Gilles Villeneuve 1977-1982 (Dead for Fatal Accident. His Cockpit ejected he T_T)
RedhotIta1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The epitome of the cheating, lying hypocrite. He could win 20 titles but so what? A terrible advert for 'sport', no shame in his cheating - it amazes me any one can be a fan of this guy.
KevHarkins1 1 year ago
Very strange. MS leads almost any record list in F1, but there are still idiots who say he isn't the best, that he won his WCs by cheating only. That's complete bullshit. First, in most of the cases where MS didn't play by the book, he got penalized. So, do you also say that Messi, Maradonna, Rummenige are bad players because they committed a foul, in the course of practicing the sport??? Second, how long would the list be of other drivers or teams having cheated??? The Schumy-haters r pathetic.
joaquinveyron 1 year ago
@joaquinveyron Toni Schumacher almost killed a man in the course of practising the sport ..search for Schumacher-Battiston in 1982...can you tell me pls what his penalty was?...i don't know, maybe it's in the name maybe Schumacher's stay in history for their ethics...humans forgive, history never.
xpandia 1 year ago
@xpandia Whar the fuck has this to do with Schumi?? Stupid!
joaquinveyron 1 year ago
@joaquinveyron
well i tell you if you don't get it ...
(that is always the problem posting in a Schumachers video..you always have to explain)...toni schumacher was a good goalkeeper but he stayed in history as an unethical bad guy for his act against Battiston....better now?nobody remembers one of his savings but also nobody forgets this game against France.
xpandia 1 year ago
@xpandia The fact that you have to explain yourselve has sth to do with your weirdness. Again, what has the Battiston-Toni Shumacher incident to do with Michael Schumacher, the greatest of the greatest??
Maybe, you should check your head. The problem with explaining things has to do with your head.
joaquinveyron 1 year ago
@joaquinveyron schumacher tops the list of every record in F1..check out on google 4mula1.. all the stats are there
bmwnasher 1 year ago
schumacher ist der beste den es gibt und schluss
manowar12334 2 years ago
Ist schon komisch. Schumacher führt nahezu jede Statistik die es in der Formel 1 gibt an, aber die Anderen sind trotzdem besser.
luxor6304 2 years ago
Ja ist schon sehr komisch!
bacKbam2000 2 years ago
Das ist nicht komisch! Das ist ganz normal, denn Schumi ist nicht tot. Wer tot ist, wird zur Legende, wie Senna oder Michael Jackson.
supersim2008 2 years ago
they where both the last and only true living legends of 20th century..you are just too young and too german to recognise it!!!
xpandia 1 year ago
I dont think, clark or senna or schui should be compared, different times different tech in the cars and competition rules so YES they are all GREATS but all so unique to each others own era none will ever be know too be better then the other unless all put in the exact same car an race each other....
cheakydarky 2 years ago 4
The third best,behind Clark and Senna.Number of titles dont mean anything,
mateus2001 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You said it. Schumacher is big but will never be the greatest. Schumi was just lucky to have an very reliable and fastest car on the track. When someone had a better car than him he didn't win. Senna did. 65 poles in 162 starts speaks clearly about how much he could get out of the car. Schumi is of course 68 poles of 250 starts. Very good also but it is far from Senna class.
VuDu4000 2 years ago
Thats not true, schumi had win races with slow cars a lot of times. Think back to the years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000 and in my eyes 2003 too. And poles doesnt count so much. Senna had 65 poles, briliant, but only 41 victories. What happend to poles? Schumi had 68 poles but 91 victories. So Schumi doesnt need a pole to win a race like senna, so he can overtake during the race. So why does schumi is far from sennas class. Can you explain that?
supersim2008 2 years ago 58
Like I said before, MS drove in an era where the reability was huge, AS drove in an era where cars broke down all the time. 94-95 Benetton cheated with the fuel rig and anti-spin. 99 MH won but sure FIA tried to help Ferrari as they were driving with illegal barge-boards, they didn't even give them points deduction.
VuDu4000 2 years ago
03 when MS came 8th at Hungary (lapped by FA). Ferrari complain to FIA (Michelin is too fast). FIA quickly goes out with a message, "Before the rule was that you measure the tire's width before the race, as of the next race, we measure the tire after the race". As a result, Michelin had 3 weeks in which to develop new tires. Of course it didn't went well and MS wins the championship.
VuDu4000 2 years ago
At least 3 titles going away because of pure cheating. The remaining 4 titles feels stale because of explicit team orders, including Austria 2002.
VuDu4000 2 years ago
@supersim2008 schumacher is an asshole.... senna was a great driver and a even greater man so schumacher will never compare to senna.
8CRAZYHORSE8 1 year ago
@8CRAZYHORSE8 u r an asshole. u stupid fucking dick
MrDewanchand 1 year ago
@supersim2008 , THE POINTS AND WINS SAY IT ALL AND MANY ANTI-SCHUMI FANS CAN'T TAKE IT!
dave00075f1 1 year ago
@supersim2008 because senna ha soul
motorhead1995able 10 months ago
@supersim2008 because senna died on track. simple as that. if schumacher were to go up in a ball of flames, no-one would argue of the best ever. sounds harsh, but senna's legend is boosted by the fact he died young...
MrPhilsd 10 months ago 12
@MrPhilsd Absolutely right. Schumacher's label as a 'cheat'... a rather failed, soft nudge in 97, a tactical stop in 2006 and whether he meant to or not, an impact in 94. People like to forget the Senna/Prost years. Suzuka in particular. We'll never know who was 'best' because the sport evolves too quickly to compare them of different generations.
WhyGenFM3 10 months ago
@MrPhilsd не пори хуйню!!!
dapoxyinax 5 months ago
@MrPhilsd
hard but it´s a fact^^
Hardundkrass 4 months ago
@supersim2008 Let me explain this phenomenon. Senna could really push to extreme's, and hence was faster over some race distances than Schumacher. However, Schumacher, due to extreme levels of fitness and determination, could race faster than any of the others over a longer sustained period. Schumii did make some "mistakes" in his career, however, he himself would say now, that due to experience over the years, that Schumacher is now a better driver than before :) Msc x
manomogul 9 months ago
@supersim2008
senna race you last race in 1994....
schumi 10 years more.
MAJORLanna 8 months ago
@MAJORLanna Senna raced in the 1980s... Schumi didn't....
racemise 7 months ago
@supersim2008 2005 he had a poor car too ;D
Marko130000 7 months ago
@supersim2008 Senna won with the best car, also if with a teammate like prost... And rules gave more credits to the brazilian due to the final classification which considered only the best 11 results on the full championship... Without it in 1988 prost would got it...
Schumi won in 94-95 without the best car, and in 2000-04 made the difference with a car on the same level of top teams, except in a couple of years(02,04) where he dominated... After a bad season closed with a great 2006..
Enri1989 6 months ago
@Enri1989 What do you mean about 94-95! Especially 94! It was clear then and has been proven now that Bennetton cheated in 94 by using traction control, and then took out Damon Hill to win the championship! You also have to remember that reliability was a lot better in 2000-2004 than in the late 80's and early 90's.
TheChristianRose1 6 months ago
@TheChristianRose1 BULLSHITS! WHY VERSTAPPEN, LEHTO AND HERBERT DIDN'T WIN ANYTHING??
Enri1989 6 months ago
@supersim2008 Read this article and remember the polls every year or every few years --- Senna has always won the "Best Driver in the History of F1". An award given by the media and former drivers (even those drivers that may have hated or disliked him) of all eras. Think about this: there's a difference between racing against an Alain Prost, Nelson Piquet, Nikki Lauda, Nigel Mansell, Gehard Berger, etc., than racing against Eddie Irvine, Rubens Barrichello, Montoya, Jacques Villeneuve, etc.
gusandsummer 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@supersim2008 Forgot, here's the article: t i n y u r l . c o m/ 4 y u 5 8 2 3 (make sure to remove all the spaces.)
gusandsummer 6 months ago
@supersim2008 senna died during his 10th season, schumacher took 16 seasons to reach his success
ucchiu23 6 months ago
Comment removed
Phoenix1664 5 months ago
@ucchiu23 Not really my friend, Senna was a 3 time champion, by 2000 Schumi was a 3 time champion, that means he reached his sucess in 9 seasons, 8 seasons really because his debut season with Jordan was only the last few races of 91, you can hardly count that!
Phoenix1664 5 months ago
@supersim2008 Don't compare him with Senna. They are both the greatest if you ask me, but each one had a different style. We lost Ayrton unfairly when he was too young, having too much to offer. I'm afraid I can't explain this either..
wanderingody 6 months ago
@supersim2008 Ur calculation is irelevant. Think 65 poles in 10 years ? And think 68 poles 20 years ? Think competition for Senna back in 80's and 90's. And think Schumi driving and beating rookies during his time. Have good day. Senna is the best ever on skills, mind power, everything when it comes in speed. Schumi reflex reaction time was 0.311 milisec. Senna was the only one to get under 200 !. And done it 168 ! ! ! ! Analyze this capability please. No training can make u do that. Only God.
burns985 5 months ago
@burns985 absolutely silly your knowledge of F1 is very much evident when u value pole positions more than victory even going by your silly statement not being 1st while starting & then winning is still more creditable - Schumi - The Ultimate God of F1 - Senna a student of Schumi
multikannan100 5 months ago
@multikannan100 You seem too old to make a comment about F1.
burns985 5 months ago
@burns985 You seem too young to understand & comment on F1
multikannan100 5 months ago
@supersim2008 SEASON OF 93, SENNA with the worst car ever, wins 5 races, get´s in 2nd in the championship, only Prost (with FW15 C "A FREAKING ROCKET THAT DROVE ITSELF) SCHUMACHER HAD THE FACTORY FORD, MUCH FASTER THAN THE MCLAREN, SENNA WAS 2nd Schumacher was 4th, Schumacher had better engine (by far) and a better chassis (by far). So he couldn´t win Senna with a much better F1 and you think that he´s better?! there is a name for that..
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO - Senna never drove an inferior car Schumi was leading Senna with his Benneton Ford which was no comparison to Senna's car . Schumi miles ahead of Senna
multikannan100 5 months ago
@multikannan100 Yes he did in 93.. watch "a season with mclaren".. it´s on youtube.. you are old enough, you watched in 93 like i did, if you were an F1 fan back then you would know.. The MP4/8 was much slower than the Benetton, wich had the Ford factory engine, whilste Mclaren. It had somethinh like 100hp less than the Benetton.. it´s a fact, don´t bend the truth to you will..
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO - If u r serious then write to the respective co's to get the truth . Schumi's driving skills was is & shall always remain unmatched . The greatest drive possibly ever was when Schumi drove 40 laps in the Spanish grandprix when he was stuck up in the 5th gear .His skills are beyond compare
multikannan100 5 months ago
@multikannan100 I don´t need to, i told how to watch on youtube, and it was a knowned thing at the time, like you know today the RBR are superior on most tracks cuz they have better grip. And Senna won in Brasil with only 6th gear in 1991.. This conversation is useless. you seem to know very little about racing, or driving. And you twist the truth every single time,..
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO But in 92 the Benetton was no match to the McLaren, and Schumacher finished his first full season infront of Senna. Why don't you mention that too?
The Benetton's engine was clearly underpowered, a Ford V8 was no match to McLaren's Honda V12 but still Michael managed to keep Senna behind him. Don't forget that too!
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig That is also not true.. In 92 they used 2 different evo´s of the Mclaren, the MP4/6B (2 first races) and MP4/7A(rest of the season). It was not a bad car, but it had many problems because it was still not fully developed.. That was the main reason, there were 7 retirements by Senna and still i was only 3 points behind Schumacher, although Schumacher had a probably slower car, it was more reliable and he could finish his races.Senna achieved 3 wins, Schumacher only 1.
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO But once again, you forget to mention that Benetton also used their 91-version for the first races and that it was Michael's first full season in F1, so coming up with Senna having 2 more wins and therefore drawing conclusions is narrowminded.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig Even so, Senna won 3 times and retired 7, Schumacher retired 4 and won 1.. Schumacher had a more relieble car, i just said that on last comment... That´s the relevant part.. Hello?'????? Jesus
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO The relevant part is that Schumi is better than Senna, nearly all facts are backing that up.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig The really relevant part is that everyboy as a right to an opinion, even if it´s a wrong one as yours is.. Go delight yourself watching the videos of Schumacher being a cheater with illegal fuel rigs, and tenth´s of other situations, and throwing hundreds of thousands of fans away from F1.. It was a dark time for F1. Schumacher is a great driver, bottom line Senna was much better in all aspects..
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JONICRACHATLEITAO (1/4)
1. Ayrton Senna always had the best cars to win his titles. Michael won two Championships in a Benetton that was equal at best to the Williams in 94 and inferior in 95. Michael then went to a team that hadn't won a single championship since 1979. With his input and work and the guys he brought to Ferrari, he turned them into a Championship winning team. So, 1-0 for Michael.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JONICRACHATLEITAO (2/4)
2. As it would be unfair to take all of Schumachers career seasons to compare him with Senna, I will take his first complete ten seasons, as well as Sennas complete seasons (which were ten aswell). In that time, Schumacher scored 4 WDC, 53 wins and 43 poles, while having inferior cars for 7 of those ten years. Senna scored 3 WDC, 41 Wins and 62 Poles in the same amount of time, having inferior cars for 6 years. 2-0 for Schumacher.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO (3/4) Schumacher is often regarded as being a cheater, but if you go into the details, you might see that Senna's unfair moves throughout his career have been much more dangerous, Senna, torpedoing into Prost at 150 mph out of spite, risking the death or serious maiming to a fellow driver, Senna almost smashed Prost against the wall in Estoril 88 too, Senna dirty against Mansell in Monaco 92, we have seen fatal accidents in similar circumstances... so, no difference here.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO (4/4) These my friend, are facts.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig Yes they are my friend, all that i´ve said are facts, you are completly accurate,, Senna was and always will be the best, the most dedicated, the most courageous, and most definitly the fastest ever..actually that´s even the opinion of someone you might know, schumacher himself, as well as almost every single f1 drivers..
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JONICRACHATLEITAO The most dedicated? And what about Spain 94, or Hungary 98? Most courageous? Like torpedoing into Prost at 150mph or pushing him into the wall? The fastest? Senna, for example, had only 11% of fastest lap, while Schumi has 30%. In every other discussion people would laugh at you for the lack of facts and the overwhelming place you put down for you own opinion and favouritism. And besides that, do you really think Michael would mention himself as the best ever, while ...
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO ... some people made a film about Sennas life and asked him for an interview? If he would have refused to do an interview, people like you would jump on that, if he would mention himself as the best ever, people like you would jump on him. You must be pretty naive to think an F1-driver of his calibre doesn't think about himself as being the best (and he has every right to do so).
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig What are you talking about?!!! You are in denial, and obviously have problems of interpretation.. You are talking about a movie that came out a year ago, i´m talking about interviews wich are 10 years old.. But i really do not want to discuss with someone that as no arguments, like you. Besides this conversation is completly useless with people like you.. Heil Schumacher the cheating nazi prick.
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Oh boy, sit down and look at my last posts. Clearly, I am the one with the arguments and facts, when I came up with plenty of them, you just repeated your opinion. And you seriously call that a discussion?
Besides that, the "Nazi-move" is commonly known on the net already, it's basically a pre-chewed-Daily-Mail-level-thought-terminating-cliché to express your helpless situation in a discussion based on facts. It's so old, and dull to come up with that, but it proves that...
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig I thin you hould read again what i wrote, those are facts, i need no arguments beacuse there are facts.. You really need either glasses or reading lessons. About the rest, grow up... Schumacher was and is a cheating driver who only the germans liked, wich lead to a dark era on F1. The schumacher era, not interesting or exciting at all... So if your conversation is based on ignoring facts and say that i have no arguments, your dumb as brick.
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Lol, one more thing: "Schumacher was and is a cheating driver who only the germans liked, wich lead to a dark era on F1. The schumacher era, not interesting or exciting at all"
Haha. Good one. Dark era of F1.... sounds scary, I can hear some Edgar-Wallace movie-intro in the background....
And of course, the fact that Michael totally humiliated the rest of the field is something which makes him worse than Senna, lol.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig HAHAHA, that was hilarious.. You should learn about something in order to talk about it, you really know very little about F1. Bye little kid, keep talking to yourself.
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO ... your IQ must be below your body-temperature. Congratulations on making yourself look like a complete idiot.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig Yes, tell yourself that.. Bye..
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig Really mature. Are you 12? come on...
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Senna with the worst car ever? I don't know the exact term for you illness, but such a sentence is simply ridiculous. In fact, Senna had only decent or by far the best cars, that's what he was looking for, like in 92, he wanted to leave McLaren immediately when not being given the best car to drive. It must hurt you hard-bitten Senna fans, that Michael achieved something Ayrton never did: Winnig World Championships with inferior cars.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig It´s very clear that you are a kid, even more a german kid who like´s schumacher.. That doesn´t make him the best for how much it hurts coming up your ass... Learn a bit about f1 and racing, and then come and comment..
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Well, first of all I am not a kid and also not a german, but geography is not your biggest strength, right?
Anyway, I think your latest outburst shows how it must have hurt you seeing Michael desoying and humiliating British teams and drivers, and winning Titles with inferior cars, slowly breaking every record holy Senna has achieved. Have a nice day! :-)
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig Ok, Austria, Hitlers country... And you should learn more of f1, Senna eon Monaco 6 times, schumacher didn´t.. Fucke head, so that means not every record was broken. You wouldn´t be talking your mouth if he had continued racing...
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Schumacher won 5 times at Monaco. In 2000 he was leading the race convincingly, when his car broke down. In 2004 Montoya crashed into him, when MSC was in the lead.
Clearly, it is not me having little knowledge, but the one who is repeating it although his opponent has the facts. But maybe you didn't know all those things because it was so dark at Schumachers time, that you couldn't see how the races developed... hilarious.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig I think 6 is a bigger number than 5.. You reckon? you must be as dumb as a freaking door, if 6 is bigger than 5, who has the record? Schumacher?!!!! That is the fact you tool.. and yes, you have little knowledge about F1, also a very visible fact,.
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Ok, so after 4 hours we found one thing where Ayrton had more success than Michael, despite Michael loosing on that one for bad luck.
Good overall results in terms of who's the best ever I would say.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@ImFasterThanTheStig Senna was better in all aspects, Schumacher just lived longer.. You really want to compare the turbo era (Senna´s first seasons) with schumacher´s first seasons? Don´t be ridiculous.. There was not 1 championship that he won that wasn´t controversial, if not hitting Hill, using illegal tyres, illegal fuel rigs, illegal wings, trying to the same to villeneuve that he had done to Hill, amongst some many other things. Schumacher is the most successfull, but not the best.
JONICRACHATLEITAO 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO Ok, that's why I took Michaels first ten years, so to make it more fair. And he's still better. The facts are speaking for Michael, but I've already noticed you don't care about facts, you rather call someone names or claim he has no clue. Childish.
And as far as I can remember, he didn't win the WDC in 97, so no point in coming up with that. The only controversial Championship was in 1994, so Michael had one controversial title, Senna had one in 1990. Another fact.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO 1995 he won although having an inferior car, 2000 he had, at best, a car that was equal to the McLarens in terms of speed. From 2001-2004 he won 4 more Championships with having the best car on the grid (not in 2003 though), so finally he got rewarded for going to a team that hasn't won titles for years, and finally he got rewarded for struggling with the crap Ferrari delivered for him in the first years. Justice, that's how I would call his domination-years.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO At the end of the day, Michael, despite being the best driver ever and the most succesfull one, never acted in a way where he would let people feel that he was the best, like Senna did.
The only thing Michael wants nowadays, is to be treated fair. And scum like you is not even willing to accept that. You are a disgrace for your country. And, more importantly, Senna would turn his back on you reading some stuff you already wrote down today. If Senna fans are represented ...
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
@JONICRACHATLEITAO ... by people like you, then that is something which Ayrton didn't deserve. Shame on you.
ImFasterThanTheStig 5 months ago
no! he was the best ! simply the best!
goef1 2 years ago 41
Ferrari did have the best car around that era. but Michael was a purely talented driver. hope he gets a good car in 2011. bet then he will be winning some races again, like the good ol days.
tompwh 1 year ago
@tompwh come on....he is to old now...the season just began...we`ll see...:)
goef1 1 year ago
@goef1 why did he come back if he is too old?
xpandia 1 year ago
@xpandia because he felt that he is still good..i don`t know...maby money..who knows?anyway...schumi is the best!;)
goef1 1 year ago
Comment removed
xpandia 1 year ago
I dont believe he was the best, but he was absolutely stunning.
GT5DrivingSchool 2 years ago
God video! :)
Rommelp5 2 years ago
Is this music AC/DC?
taku221 2 years ago
what's the song?
wowcanyonero 2 years ago
SIMPLY THE BEST
eriknaa 2 years ago
Notice there are no comments?
Its because nobody agreees he was the best = we all know he just had the best cars and team orders - he was slightly above average thats all. The master of them all was THE SENNA!
mallamoozoo 3 years ago
I agree, Schumacher is the best asshole/cheater ever.
lazerpod66 3 years ago
SENNA WAS INFINITE!
mallamoozoo 3 years ago