Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (106)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I know It's got nothing to do with the lawful proposition being offered here (purely for entertainment purposes, of course), but can I just say...It's mostly because the greedy bastards have got us all slaving our lives away that people rush about (in cars) so much. It's easy to say "oh well, the worlds not that simple these days", but if you have a bit of a think about it, it's true. If your day was yours, you could take all day getting there! Keep cars on the racetrack. Lov' n peace, danny.

  • The brilliant move is to get the officer, or, any beaurocrat who wants your money, to produce FACTS. What this man has done, and in a very crafty way, is to box the officer into a corner because he assumed everything and could not produce what is a fact - everyone has the Creator given right to travel without permission. It is buried under pounds of legalese in the Act itself, but the Act does not take away travel rights.

  • Absolutely brilliant vid, thanx so much for posting. I am very well aware of the so called freeman movement and this helps to sum it up in the most simple terms. Check out John Harris "it an illusion" if you have not done already.

  • the traffic ACTS here in CANADA say any PERSON who. The Criminal Code of Canada and Charter of Rights and Freedoms say anyONE who.

    Why the distinction? They just happened to choose a different word those days?

  • good come back, well thought out and makes no sense.  i take it your professionally trained barrister or possibly a negotiator

  • Highway CODE: COde is a code of BEHAVIOUR - its like going to work and you have a CODE of CONDUCT.

    So we have Laws and Acts and on top we have BYE LAWS and we need CODES aswell - DAMN THIS - we have more CONTROLS than SOVIET RUSSIA - PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE UP. We live in a CONTROLLED SYSTEM to the MAX!!

    CODE MY ARSE. HIGHWAY CODE.

    It is a CON - tr - ACT.

    CON and play ACTing

  • good stuff! time for more about the difference between common and commercial law. once every 'person' realises the cracks in the system it will crumble around those that use it to control the will of others. we are born free!!...untill our old man dobbed us in anyhow!!

  • firstly if your in a car, on a road, a cop can ask you for license, and you can be arrested. thats because he needs your license to make sure you have a license and then able to process you for the offence in this case speeding. the example your setting here is that the guy in the right is being an arse.

    asking for your license when youve committed a traffic offence is pretty basic stuff and probably the first thing cops get taught.

  • @fiddlest1cks

    So?

  • excellent video danny, thanks everso much! xx

  • what if you have been caught by a speed camera tho danny??????????

  • Could only listen to a part as the sound is soo bad. Interesting tho

  • Comment removed

  • Brilliant tactics.

  • if i am stopped for no real reason at all, can i just say has "this" car been reported stolen, and if not there has been no crime reported, or something like that?

    I got pulled a couple of years ago just cause i pulled out a pub car park, and that was there excuse, i broke no traffic laws.

  • Although I agree with what you do when you are stopped and searched in public areas for usings your megaphone and stuff (because you aren't committing a crime there), I don't understand why protest against the Highway Code.

    The Highway code is put up to minimise the many tragic and unnecessary deaths on public roads and has done successively. Why go over the speed limit when you are risking your life and the life of others? - Thanks.

  • @koolyman i am not protesting the highway code. I think you have missed the point. It actually goes to the rotten core of the legal system.

  • @koolyman 'The Highway code is put up to minimise the many tragic and unnecessary deaths on public roads' its not working in that respect

  • @MinistryofWeed I disagree. When it was introduced in 1931 there were over 7000 deaths per year with 2.3million vehicles on the roads. Now there are 2000 deaths with 32million vehicles. Not one death of those are acceptable but the number is better than before we had the code. So I believe it does work in that respect and that's why I respect it.

  • @koolyman those stats are always like that. but if you think about it in 1930's it took a car Xyards to stop now a super charged v8 can stop on a pin head but you think a code done it. if we took note of the code the million £ speeding ticket industry would not exist. you clearly don't drive because if you did you would see that 70% of drivers do not follow the code

    just looked at your chanel if your really 18 do not get back to me with your inexperience come back in 10... years

    sorry

  • @MinistryofWeed I am a driver, a new one, and I can say with confidence motorists do follow the code. If people 70% of people were reversing up a dual carriageway, pulling out regardless of another vehicle was on the main road or ignoring a red light, then that 70% of people would be breaking the code; but do you really see that happening?

    A couple of years ago I went to Italy and their highway code is ACTUALLY ignored. Italy has a considerably larger road traffic deaths per 1000.

  • @koolyman if we all lived in cotton wool lined coffins without stepping outside of them then there would be zero deaths on the road

  • @ConspiracyLoon I did say before the code is there to minimise deaths. Not diminish them which would be near impossible without getting rid of traffic all together.

  • @koolyman Assuming your use of the word 'diminish' to mean eliminate, then I do not agree, all deaths could be eliminated by, for arguments sake, introducing speed limits of 1mph everywhere, people would still be driving, and any deaths from them driving at 1mph, would not be due to them driving. lol, quite unlike the present system, where if a pedestrian plays chicken with cars, it is the drivers fault.

  • @ConspiracyLoon That's why I carefully said "near impossible" :) . I think Sweden or is, or was, or at least said it was attempting to eliminate all traffic deaths. If the speed limit was 20mph, let alone 1mph, I would probably kill myself anyway haha.

  • @koolyman to diminish is to reduce, reduce coincides with the act of minimisation. I don't understand ur last statement in the context of your first. Cheers

  • @ConspiracyLoon Oh sorry. I used that word wrongly. When I said diminish I meant eliminate.

  • @koolyman Doesnt everyone, including the police, go over the speed limit? The fact is, the speed limit, amongst millions of other codes, are put in place to feed the machine

  • @walkertonkidd excellent question. Of course almost everyone does it, some get caught more often than others !

  • @walkertonkidd Yes speed limits are an interesting part as many, many people do it. A lot of those people are lucky enough to never crash. But the fact remains if you're travelling faster than the rest of traffic you are more likely to crash.

    Finally I do agree with your point - the way this country is being managed politically with EU policy such as 'improving the living standards of dogs in Hungary'. It's just meaningless revenue.

  • @koolyman You are putting forth an opinion based on a scenerio that may not be real. You assume that because you travel over the posted limit, you are moving faster than the other traffic, therefore you are more likely to crash and you are lucky if you dont. factually, there are more crashes at intersections than anywhere else. Speed factor crashes are a small percentage of the sum total. IT IS TO FACILLITATE COMMERCE ONLY! Their brainwash techniques work wonderfully though....

  • @walkertonkidd When I talked about when you travel faster than the rest of traffic,I did not make the assumption that would happen once you were above the limit.I should have clarified that. It is still true (I'm sure you'll agree) that once you are travelling faster than the rest you are more likely to crash.

    Now if the number of deaths wouldn't increase if the speed limit increased, and you gave me outstanding evidence the speed limit is there to facilitate commerce, I would change my argument

  • @koolyman Firstly, there is a big legal difference between "breaking" a law and "violating" a code. Secondly, the more outstanding evidence is, it costs you money when you are caught speeding. What other way to facillitate commerce is there? Intersections are the largest percentage of crash sites, where most people arent speeding.They have bankrupted us, they own us, and we let it happen, now what do we do about it?

  • @walkertonkidd But what other kind of punishment can there be other than financial to prevent people from breaking laws or violating codes. Say if you were in a shooting range, one rule is do not ever lean against the weapon. Same thing with cars. Right?

    Road safety continuously develops. Some junctions can be complicated and therefore cause some people to be confused. I would think that would be down to bad design rather than an intended flaw to maximise crashes.

  • @koolyman "Road safety continuously develops. Some junctions can be complicated and therefore cause some people to be confused. I would think that would be down to bad design rather than an intended flaw to maximise crashes."

    I agree about bad design. It's not to cause crashes. It is however, DELIBERATE "bad design", and it's done to hamper progress, to limit everyone's productivity. This causes a need for more cars, fuel sales, insurance, jobs etc. It's planned economic maximisation.

  • @walkertonkidd Now I disagree with you that the highway code and road designs are intentionally flawed and speed limits aren't there to minimise deaths; but I do agree with you that once rules are broken, the punishment system can be abused to be made too harsh and to make a profit.

  • freeman bullshit.. what a massive waste of time...spending hours of free time learning just to add complication to your life and interactions with society in a delusion that this in some way liberates you.. lol

  • Some questions for your friend Danny, or any freeman.

    Do the benefits of being a freeman out weigh the potential hassles? Is traveling internationally difficult? How does health care operate should you need care? Is there trouble with employers, would it be best to be self employed as a freeman?

    thanks

  • Can someone explain this concept for me better? What I am picking up is that the 'driver' is claiming to not be subject to a law that applies to all who chose to use the road. This doesn't make any sense as he clearly is. If there's something anyone sees that I can't please tell me. Thanks!

  • @MrJamesPhillpott i think you need to understand the concept a bit better. i think your missing the point. he is abiding by the law totally.

  • I wonder how this would go down if you tried it in China.I heard UK judges are unlawfully sentencing people anyway who know the freeman stuff.This stuff is interesting but will only take freedom so far.The best form of freedom is an assault rifle when the police state come kicking doors in.Sad but true.

  • @UndefeatedArmy09

    No, you'll be outpowered by their guns and will face a fast death.

  • @CleverDjembe Well the best advise would be to do nothing & obey your orders in the concentration camp then until the state decides to dispose of you anyway.

  • @UndefeatedArmy09

    HAHAHA, grim!

  • @CleverDjembe The truth usually is.

  • @UndefeatedArmy09

    Hmm... sometime yes, sometime no. Stupid answer - I know :)

  • 303rd again how odd

    

  • He is "stoned" (on his t-shirt) and is "there's enough" (on your t-shirt) for me too? :D

  • Are there people doing this in the United States? Are the laws pretty much the same where I could challenge them and potentially get away without a ticket?

  • @mattattam11 Technically yes, America is a common law society, just like England. There has to be a victim in order for there to be a crime, according to common law.

  • @OrganGrindersSwing so since I am not victimizing anyone by speeding I am not committing a crime?

  • @mattattam11 Correct, that's how are law system was originally set up, but now we have been usurped into an admiralty or corporate law system, where everything is controlled by rules and regulations. In reality, if there's no victim, there's no crime, period.

  • @OrganGrindersSwing I've never thought of it like that before. Thank u for ur responses :). It seems like there are a lot of laws to prevent from creating a potential victim. I can see how many regulations are abused and downright ridiculous at times. But aren't some regulations beneficial? An example is having restrictions on buildings being too high next to airstrip so they won't crash into them. Also restricting access to a dangerous area so people won't get hurt.

  • @mattattam11 Of course some regulations are necessary, that's where common law=common sense regulations. I'm not suggesting that there are no regulations, like suggested speed limits, but if you are the only person on the road and going 10 over the speed limit, then there's no victim or danger. Therefore common sense would tell you that there's no crime. We've strayed away from common sense law to strict corporate law that's about nothing more than revenue collection.

  • @OrganGrindersSwing that's a great point on common sense law versus corporate law. That makes a lot of sense.

  • What I see in the conversation is a refusal and argument all the time by the guy being stopped by the spiritual officer... therefore don't think it would work that much...

  • Thanks for the upload. There is a similar video on youtube that you should all have a look at. On youtube search "BUSTED: The Citizen's Guide to Surviving Police Encounters" its a 45 minute long dvd and is set in the states but you will get the point. worth a look folks.

  • @tearimissyou The dog was role-playing being a border patrol dog and was trying to alert the policeman that there was a body in the boot of the car! ;D

  • It's very interesting.

    I wish for better audio or a text transcription, because I couldn't hear everything.

  • @CleverDjembe Same here.

  • i think the freeman perspective is also a response to europäische gemeinschaft a doccument signed by the allies and the germans in 1942 which states that sould germany lose the war militarily, they could continue for european dictatorship through political and economic means, europäische gemeinschaft translates to and is the nazi vision for a 'european union' which we joined in the 70's, a treasonous act and slowly our soveriegnty and power to govern ourselves fades away unnoticed.........

  • Yes I have seen her. She is pretty impressive

  • nice idea danny!!;)

  • @tiatdivad you do understand you were born into a Prison and you have become so accustomed your reality is distorted, YOU are the very problem that has caused all this, start thinking and living for YOU and NOT your slave masters

  • i should send you my wireless mic, as i cannot use it with my laptop, and You can. really i would like to send it. PM me if you'd like. i live in ashland,oregon. peace brother.

  • you should admit to doing 60 miles per hour in a 50 zone but explain to them that you are responsible and able to govern yourself. 70 mile per hour in a 50 zone proves that you arent able to govern yourself and that your not responsible enough for the safty of others, and in my opinion you should have to do some community service rather than pay a fine.

  • Rich people do not pay taxes or fines. Therefore freeman movement is validated.

  • @Nomels Yes they do?

  • This was pretty fun and interesting Danny, thanks for sharing. nice one.

  • oh yeah and cops where i live all wear that stoner t shirt ;)

  • Awesome upload many thanks for sharing this wisdom ;)

  • in the u.s. this guy would be in the back of the police car after about 90 seconds.

  • recently got busted by camera doing 27 in a 20mph zone - I've opted for the 'Speed Awareness Course' at the sum of nearly £100 (otherwise it's £60 & a 3 point penalty which means an increase in the insurance premium, which incidentally, will more than likely rise come the time of renewal).

    AA Direct host the course and it is presented as a service. We are described as 'customers'.

  • Does that mean that The Magna Carta is null & void because it was signed under duress?

    I know that sounds like a troll type comment (not intended to be) but the point being, do freemen still use article 61 for their own advantage?

    The sound did make it tough to follow if, like me, the viewer can only access this by phone :-(

    Apart from that, I'm loving the videos.

  • @tiatdivad fair enough. I too am not convinced about it but I think htere is a lot of truth in it and I think people like John Harris make an important link with who we really are and what the system has turned us into

  • Thanks for this, I really appreciate it : D

  • He would not reach court because he would write to them stating this. He has had many successes doing this

  • Point is that once the threat is made the contrAct is null and void because it's signed under duress

  • Even if they had evidence hispoin

  • the police car would record the speed from the dashcam and the drivers gps would also proove his speed. the word of a policeman is also worth alot on the stand.

  • @tiatdivad please expand. there are actually a lot of intersting aspects to what eyal is saying here if you think about it.

  • Trouble is Danny it doesn't work like that in the real world. When they get you into "their" court you're "a gonna"! The police will lie their arse off , fabricate allegations and or charges against you. We don't live in a utopian world where justice is done. Road Traffic Acts are about fleecing money from the people by deception . The whole legal system is supposed to be based on the concept of a higher entity than humankind , but i haven't seen one in court to ensure justice is done ....yet.

  • @dynotuner " just for your spiritual entertainment "

  • @dynotuner i forgot to mention that you record everything. crucial.

  • @spiritualentertainer Danny, are you familiar with a woman from BC, Canada named Irene Gravenhorst?

    I just came across some interesting videos where she elucidates some of the freeman/freewoman information. She actually had some very long legal battles which ultimately sided in her favor. This seems like an incredible example of someone using common law to challenge, and beat, the banks and the courts at their own game. I don't know much at all, but what she does fascinates me. Cheers.

  • @spiritualentertainer P.S. I'm sure if you search her name, you'll find everything I've seen on the subject and more.

    I love your work. Thanks for being so brave.

  • who's yawning in the background?

  • @globalbankfraud it's The Police! =D

  • thats a debtor freeman, be a creditor, always bring remedy to the situation. poor example bro. and talk about BITCOIN

  • @42kang dont really understand what you are saying here. i put this up to se what reactions might follow so please do explain more.

  • @spiritualentertainer I recognised the word bitcoin, it's an entirely virtual currency with no centralised system of control, it uses cryptography and computation to ensure it's security. Very interesting from a technical perspective but also it has a lot of interesting implications on society and governments if it were to become widely adopted.

  • @egokick Bitcoin is a really great idea.. but... at the moment the Internet or portions of it can be completely turned off by just a few "leaders" such as Obama and his Cybersecurity Act. It would be deemed a threat to National Security if such a system encroached on the national currency. The first thing we need is an Internet guaranteed to be free from government interference. If Bitcoin can operate on a layer or a network outside of government control though...

  • @spiritualentertainer

    Regarding the debtor / creditor approach, Ben lowery is a good person to watch on youtube as well as the Spaniard among others.

    Personally i dont have the level of focus required to get it all down but i am using the basic freeman approach. The simplest thing is not recognising these statutes and the enforcers authority over you the sovereign human being.

  • @spiritualentertainer hey danny, all i meant is when an argument takes place, you have dishonored the charge and dropped the proverbial ball. I shouldn't really complain.

  • @spiritualentertainer I got stopped and questioned by police on my bike without a helmet like you did, Its not easy to remain honourable, especially after a few drinks.

  • Shame the sound wasn't very clear Danny. I found it a bit hard to follow.

  • zeleventh

  • furzt

  • @SanzB zecund

    

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more