If you have a kid in the MA public schools you'll soon find out how your parental rights have been taken away from you. Your Kindergardener will be required to read books such as King and King (a story about 2 men falling in love). Parents aren't even allowed to opt their kids out of that curriculum. Tolerance is a two way street. When it becomes a one way street it is tyranny, not tolerance.
If marriage is sacred, as I believe it is, then, Government should NOT even come close to touching it...lisencing, probate, registration,,,ALL of it should be gone. The problem is, the government makes too much money off of marriage...and, consequently, divorce.
1/No same sex marriage is giving reglion the right to make law. That is theocratic. That is unamerican. The first admendment is against therocracy america. Therefore banning same sex marriage is unconstitutional.
2/People have the right to love who they wish and spend the rest of their life ith who they wish. To ban it is mob rule. That is why it is a civil right.
1- Government NOT being involved in ANY aspect of marriage affords the freedom for people to marry whoever they want.
2- We agree on your 2nd point, they already have the right to love each other, cohabbitate. They SHOULD have same treatment for insurance, hospital visitation..all of it. The solution is NOT more government involvement, it is less. Take away tax advantages for married people as well.
Liberals are not asking for more government. We trying to get people to do what Barry Goldwater suggests to the reglious right. "Kick them in the ass."
you ron Paulers say you are not like the reglious crazies in this country like John Hagee. They why do you want to ban one group of people from marriage.? Why support the reglious nuts?
Yeah! Voted NO on 1 this afternoon! I'm so nervous about the results, though... =/
This wouldn't be such a problem if Bishop Malone hadn't ordered his minions to vote YES... and then my dad had to go and write an article in the Journal defending him... X/
The big problem with the Maine system is that the opponents get to select the question - it should instead be - do you approve the legislation? not do you want to remove this legislation?
In a tight race like Maine the fact the people who want the law have to vote no does not make sense.
The phrasing has always been backwards for the People's Veto because of the title of the Article in Maine's Constitution, so they're always "Do you want to veto this bill?" when the actual wording of the article says that the questions should be phrased the other way around (or so I've been told).
The R71 people in Washington have a nicer question - they get to say yes to the legislation - which seems psychologically better for the legislation proposers.
We need Sarah Palin as President so that she will completely BAN and ABOLISH same-sex marriage! She will have all gays and lesbians go through a mandatory federal re-education program backed by the church so that they convert from homo to hetero and straight! There is no room for gays, homos and lesbians in Christian Conservative Palinist America!
This has been flagged as spam show
We provide real Russian ladies online now gettop5.info
othaminjaresjdl 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Be ready Latin ladies ** rockmycity.info **
gimireeta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Marry a beautiful Russian lady gettop5.info
gwynrangeraal 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Online marriage service from Russia gettop5.info
othaminjaresjdl 1 year ago
If you have a kid in the MA public schools you'll soon find out how your parental rights have been taken away from you. Your Kindergardener will be required to read books such as King and King (a story about 2 men falling in love). Parents aren't even allowed to opt their kids out of that curriculum. Tolerance is a two way street. When it becomes a one way street it is tyranny, not tolerance.
MrsDoGood 2 years ago
take government out of all marriages!
TheDuckofLaw 2 years ago
If marriage is sacred, as I believe it is, then, Government should NOT even come close to touching it...lisencing, probate, registration,,,ALL of it should be gone. The problem is, the government makes too much money off of marriage...and, consequently, divorce.
MrProgressivelib 2 years ago
0 for 31. Marriage is NOT a RIGHT, therefore, it is NOT a civil liberty. Government should be totally removed from any aspect of ALL marriage.
MrProgressivelib 2 years ago
Two points
1/No same sex marriage is giving reglion the right to make law. That is theocratic. That is unamerican. The first admendment is against therocracy america. Therefore banning same sex marriage is unconstitutional.
2/People have the right to love who they wish and spend the rest of their life ith who they wish. To ban it is mob rule. That is why it is a civil right.
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
"Two Points"
1- Government NOT being involved in ANY aspect of marriage affords the freedom for people to marry whoever they want.
2- We agree on your 2nd point, they already have the right to love each other, cohabbitate. They SHOULD have same treatment for insurance, hospital visitation..all of it. The solution is NOT more government involvement, it is less. Take away tax advantages for married people as well.
MrProgressivelib 2 years ago
Liberals are not asking for more government. We trying to get people to do what Barry Goldwater suggests to the reglious right. "Kick them in the ass."
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
you ron Paulers say you are not like the reglious crazies in this country like John Hagee. They why do you want to ban one group of people from marriage.? Why support the reglious nuts?
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
Really, then why are straights allowed to get married anywhere they want, but not gays.
Also, try taking marriage away from straight people, and see what kind of response you get.
BoredomCorner 2 years ago
Government should get out of the marriage biz. Period,
MrProgressivelib 2 years ago
What about people who want to get married in a secular context?
BoredomCorner 2 years ago
Go ahead. Government shouldn't be involved. Pick whoever you want to perform whatever ceremony you want.
MrProgressivelib 2 years ago
Yeah! Voted NO on 1 this afternoon! I'm so nervous about the results, though... =/
This wouldn't be such a problem if Bishop Malone hadn't ordered his minions to vote YES... and then my dad had to go and write an article in the Journal defending him... X/
Dentarthurdent54 2 years ago
I live in Maine, and I was so excited to vote today. But I'm too sick to get up. :(
TheAbbyNormal 2 years ago
The big problem with the Maine system is that the opponents get to select the question - it should instead be - do you approve the legislation? not do you want to remove this legislation?
In a tight race like Maine the fact the people who want the law have to vote no does not make sense.
johncrwarner 2 years ago 2
The phrasing has always been backwards for the People's Veto because of the title of the Article in Maine's Constitution, so they're always "Do you want to veto this bill?" when the actual wording of the article says that the questions should be phrased the other way around (or so I've been told).
Dentarthurdent54 2 years ago
The R71 people in Washington have a nicer question - they get to say yes to the legislation - which seems psychologically better for the legislation proposers.
johncrwarner 2 years ago
Vote NO on 1!!
(Finally, some recognition that my state exists!! lol)
ATFrez 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
We need Sarah Palin as President so that she will completely BAN and ABOLISH same-sex marriage! She will have all gays and lesbians go through a mandatory federal re-education program backed by the church so that they convert from homo to hetero and straight! There is no room for gays, homos and lesbians in Christian Conservative Palinist America!
ecwaufisxtreme 2 years ago
He's a troll guys, don't get so wound up lol
SirPwn4lot 2 years ago 2
so your for brainwashing?
idaman12345 2 years ago
Separation from church and state WTF!! Come on no one remembers this?
Oban2006 2 years ago 4
VOTE NO ON 1! VOTE NO ON HATE!
slytherinspy1960 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
first comments make me so excited
tat1anagee 2 years ago
you just cant hide it
MartinezCowboys1 2 years ago
And an idiot.
dEdGrimley 2 years ago 2
yeeeee
tat1anagee 2 years ago