Added: 4 years ago
From: laurimyllyvirta
Views: 1,562
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • to previous shill comments - FUKUSHIMA -nuke chancers and fantasists squirm , spin and lie to the bitter end

  • How about you get a real job lady.

  • Every nuclear plant they stop is just another Coal plant to be built.

  • Greenpeace people need to get a life!

  • Its so funny watching greenpeace blockades. Especially when the founder of greenpeace is now a pro nuclear lobbist.

  • Well said jlg420, they also block reprocessing and storage efforts, then say that the waste problem hasn't been addressed.

    Anti-nuke people, forget greenpeace and embrace science based realistic solutions to environmental problems. This means nuclear, solar, wind NOW. Being wrong doesn't make you stupid, but refusing to change when you are shown to be wrong does. Come back from March 29, 1979 and join us here in 2008.

  • Greenpeace does everything it can to disrupt new plant construction, and then they yell and scream about delays and cost overruns.

    HILLARIOUS

  • millä tavalla sitten hommaamme sähkön, jos ei olisi ydin voimaa....Tuulivoimalla?????.. naurettavaa pelleilyä. (oma kantani)

  • That's funny...

    I don't see her Ph.D in civil engineering anywhere.

  • a Ph.D in civil engineering wouldn't do much to qualify you to participate in an ethical discussion, does it?

  • no, but it would give her some credibility with people who can think objectively

    being an activist and an expert are two completely different things. the stories i could tell about berkeley and LBNL...

    long story short, these people have little to no background in science, and they tell people what they want to hear. they take the words of a fictional story to be the absolute scientific truth

  • what the hell is she saying?

  • The question w the safety violations is if its ok to allow construction to go on when requirements arent met and even the regulator say the number of violations is so large that some might slip through. The violations in e.g. welding have gone on for years now in Olkiluoto which shows our call for stricter measures was in place: the measures STUK has taken havent put an end to cutting corners. We also commissioned a report on the problems from a PhD with plenty of experience in nuke construction

  • aren't there people who have PhDs and experience in biology who believe in creationism?

    even if your ringer has a PhD in nuclear engineering it's not a matter of his opinion. it's a matter of the scientific community laughing at his opinion

  • Its certainly not ethical discussion, its civil engineering or more like energy engineering discussion. Ethical discussions are like "is gay marriage wrong?".

    (No i don't think its wrong )

  • this is an ethical discussion. is it better to put nuclear science in the hands of political idealists or credentialed nuclear scientists?

  • @laurimyllyvirta

    An ethical discussion concerning civil engineering? Yes, it would. Sorry, I didn't mean to poke the embers of this one, but I just couldn't let that one go.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more