@2:40 Nice. The Super Group in the Grand Canyon, the tilted layers under the level layers proving the earth is millions of years old. And my favorite part of the canyon.
I can't understand why so many people believe in science when there's perfectly good fairy tales to have faith in that have been around so much longer and SAY that they're true! That's proof! Now let's go kill our families if they don't believe and torture and mass murder those who have different views.
Atheism is the nihilistic belief in...nothing. Something coming from nothing is irrational, illogical and impossible. The chances of an accidental universe capable of supporting life are 1 in 10 to the 10th power to the 123rd power (calculations by famed British Mathematician Roger Penrose), making atheism's claim a mathematical impossibility.
Wow, this guy just does not believe in half truths. It MUST be all or nothing. And by the way based on every human I know, I would not put human reason on such a high pedestal.
Please explain to me what you find deceptive about the teaching of evolution. I find your statement quite ridiculous considering evolution is the backbone of modern biology and genetics.
@baudiirocz I know biologists who secretly deny evolution because they find this theory to be a scientific fairy tale but in fear of losing their job they still teach it And these guys are not creationists but unbiased ,honest,and THINKING scientists ,they even laugh at R.Dawkins ,they think that he s a clown or a media whore who is afraid of losing his fame witch in fact could diminish his erectile streght (Sorry his God Dellusion book is intellectualy poor )
The theory does seem very logical and it makes plenty of sense scientifically. For me personally, there are still too many holes in it to be accepted as absolute truth but I feel it's a definite possibility.
u dont hav2deny any of these things becos most of them r just evolutionary spin attached2observations.
homologous structures.
just prove theres no otha explanation 4 homologous structures.just prove that a common designer wldnt use similar structures.Vestigial organs hardly prove that new organs r growing or evolving. show us the bird that developed a partial wing not 1 that lost the use of the 1s it had.A wing? y would u assume it used 2 b4 flying?
i dont think its evolution per se that bothers people. its the idea that it denies the existence of god not by choice but by evidence. god created everything out of nothing. evolution says that everything started at something and then moved on or was pushed out of the way. i mean if evolution is such a terrible thing, that it goes against everything you have been told, then i guess it truly is just a theory. and btw, isnt the rapture supposed to happen soon or am i just ignorant?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The peppered moth is not valid its a hoax but you need this lie to prove your zombie science
Evolution is not science but if we refute it you call us retards even though some of us have Phd s in physics,biology,mathematics,medicals,philosophy,engineering etc.. you say that we are retards well i realise that you are brainwashed and you cannot admit your errors or hoaxes
Evolution is a parasite to science which you corrupted .God gave us a morsell of His science to help us live on this planet
@baudiirocz I learned it in school ,i thought that evolution was how we came to be but later as an investigator i questioned this theory because of its many lies that evolutionists spreaded in textbooks (Pepper moth,Piltdown man,Lucy etc.)So i ask myself this question:Why did they use lies to claim their theory as fact?An honest scientist would question it as opposed to ascientist who only wants fame so that he will get his p&%^s sucked by a drunk cheerleader (R.Dawkins is one of those )
You do realise how hypocritical your post is right? You're the one refusing to give up your bronze age religions and fairytales Evolution is science, wether you like it or not. It is by no means refuted, it's stronger then ever. just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean it didn't happen. If you just want to bury your head in the sand and be ignorant instead of thinking, fine. but please leave the thinking minds in our society do their job: make the world a better place.
@Nydracommander I understand evolution they fuckin cram it in my mind in school but as a science i find it not valid unlike other sciences ..Information is information in order to reproduce itself a cell must have a code and this code must come from an intelligent being because that code cannot be made by itself and chance is not scientific unless you have faith in chance (i dont) like most evolutionist have.Can you tell me the mathematical probability of a single living cell forming from dust?
@SonofJaphet The mathematical probability of a cell forming sponaneously from dust is nigh infinitely improbable.....good thing thats not what evolution says (exact opposite of chance...ie natural SELECTION)
@SonofJaphet in 2009 scientists formed self-replicating RNA in a lab. They only used heat, electricity, and chemicals that would have been around before life on earth. The probability that genetic code can come from non-life? One out of one. Be well. -BR
really? the invention of antibiotics alone reduced GOBAL deaths by 30%!! it's hard to wrap your mind around how massive that is. life expectancy has skyrocketed. Infant death has almost been eliminated. famine has disappeared. We have worldwidecommunication, firefighterplanes, tsunamiwarning systems... We no longer need to labor all day long so we have to enjoy our lives. how has science not made the world a better place?
I have to confess that I'm glad there is science in the world and it makes life better for some of us.
But still the earth will surprising human beens with all his powers and we can do nothing about that. Look at Haiti they didn't saw it coming. how is that possible.
that's why we need to let science progress. we may not be able to do it now, but in the future we might devise an earthquake warning system, so we can get those people out of harms way - earthquakes don't kill people, collapsing buildings do. for now we'll have to resort to building expensive erathquake resistant buildings, which are hard to come by in places like haiti sadly.
Okay that's reasonable.. I believe in science like I believe in faith and thinking that they have to go along with each other instead of ignoring each other.
@DjTankus - "I believe in science like I believe in faith"
Now that's an oxymoron. Not only that but an incredibly stupid and uneducated comment. To believe is to have faith, and all faith by definition is blind. I don't BELIEVE in the things science discovers to be true, I ACCEPT them as facts.
"they have to go along with each other instead of ignoring each other"
There was this one time period when "science" and faith didn't ignore eachother. We call it the DARK AGES!
i'm curious though, what you have to say to all the transitional forms presented by this video. I'm also curious why you say god gave us science. Science is the opposite of god. If you reject evolution, you reject science. you can't have it both ways.
@SonofJaphet And they use creationism in their field, how exactly?
There have not been a single theory coming from the creationist scientists, ever. Creationism has not contributed in any field with more knowledge on how the world works.
@simonwedege Do you want a list of scientists who believed that God created the Universe and made contributions to science ?Ill give you one name Lord Rayleigh who invented dimensional analysis .The problem with evolutionists is that a scientist who have many Phd s decides to reject evolution automatically becomes a fake scientist ,a retard even though he is more knowlegable than most of you ,ithis is hypocrisy or scientific censorship and that makes you like nazis
@SonofJaphet No, I wanted to know which scientists who use "creation science" or "intelligent design" in their field, instead of evolution? And why they haven't come up with a single theory?
There have been many scientists who believe or at some point believed in God. But that doesn't make them creationists, including young earth creationists.
@SonofJaphet A Ph.D. doesn't become a fake scientist if they reject evolution. But there must be some good reasons to reject one of the most well documented theories in science, which is being used in almost all fields of science.
There is no censorship. Maybe you confuse "peer-review" with "censorship"? It's certainly no the same thing. But science isn't a democratic process. Scientists don't get to vote on which theory they like best. It's all about evidence and testing.
@SonofJaphet "some of us" NOT YOU! The ones that do, do not deny evolution,but include in "God's plan". and do not envision a God as a actual entity but a figurative one, an explanation of the unknown, or as Einstein, the constants of the universe.
@NOmeansnoFAN Its not my problem if you believe in a pseudo-scientific fairy tale
I understand your position though ,you paid hundreds of dollars to learn this zombie science it is normal to defend it since you wasted your money on this crap
@SonofJaphet Name one Biology professor, other than Behe, who believes in creationism. Evolution is accepted by about 99.8% of scientists (you know, the guys who actually study it.) In comparison, there are 4 times as many historians who reject the holocaust as there are biologists who reject evolution.
@Ninvus2 Behe is not a creationist but an honest scientist and me i ve studied Darwinism,i acccepted this theory as fact but later i discarded it because it has no proof only suppositions so for me evolutionism is just a philosophy that dates back to Antique Greece (Anaximander,Empedocles,Plato Aristotle) who got it from the Vedic Hindoos .As for biologists there are more than .2% who dont believe it because they dont want to lose their jobs or have their career ended
The fact of the matter is that evolution is completely emasculated until it answers the question of the origin and existence of life. It is the single most important question. Without a suitable answer to this question evolution will remain the Scientific Eunuch!
So where did this life factor come from and where is your proof for it. We know one empirical fact about life and that is that it comes from something living. The first human life came from a living God.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Show me one instance of non living atoms ( of which all the universe and life in it are made) becoming living things by nothing but the forces of nature. You can't even do it in the laboratory with all the high tech equipment and human resources. Now just tell me where it has happened or show me where has happened that non life gave rise to life. If you can't answer this simple question honestly you have no right to palaver on about some concocted story of origins called evolution.
show me any evidence that supports the that universe was created in six day by some all-mighty sky daddy, how a rib can be turned into a woman, how a bush can light on fire without burning.
we don't know everything in science, but we can separate educated guesses based on empirical evidence from pure bullshit written in some book 3000 years ago, i think i'm with the scientists on this one
by the way, bacterial life has been created in labs by scientists.
Nobody can prove anything empirically about the origin of life including evolutionists because no human alive today was there at the beginning. However you know as well as I do that it takes something Living to produce new life. That a Living God created "Life" is far more plausible than non living atoms (and where did they come from?) being able to form themselves into living things!
it still doesn't mean we should believe in fairy-tails. the reason I accept the theory of evolution is because it is the best theory we have to explain the diversity of life on earth, and it has withstood attacks on to today.
there is also nothing observable to tell us that intelligence created living matter anyway, so how can you assert that you know for sure it did? like you said we just don't know
and if intelligence created life, what created the intelligence? i doubt we'll ever know
You keep saying atoms like that's magic word. I hate to break it to you but inorganic sources produce organic atoms (basically any molecule with carbon) , that have never been part of anything living. From there's it not a big step to amino acids, the building blocks of life.
How the first living thing came together is a mystery. One scientists are determine to solve. What will you say when they solve it? And do it again and again under different conditions? Make up your lies now, it's coming.
Facts in science must be VERIFICABLE, not REPRODUCTIBLE! But put some soap into water, and than put a irregular structure, like a rock, o even twisted wire in and out! What you have! A membrane, much similar to cell membrane! The phisical principle is the same... So, one problem less! Put some phospholipids in water an see wath happens naturally.
Although this a great video with very detailed information (facts), there is one thing I disagree with which was at 8:29. I think that all people who deny evolution do so because of ignorance, especially, the ignorance of being unwilling to accept the truth when it doesn't fit into their beliefs.
I think your only disagreement then is that they say "most" while you say "all." Admittedly you are correct though. Peopel who deny evolution are ignorant in one way or another. Some may just be uneducated yet others are brainwashed into ignoring the evidence. It's a bit sad. Sometimes I feel as though we are Galileo, confident and proven in his facts yet not believed because others would rather accept fairytale than reality.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There are no transitional species found in the fossil record. There are no proven scientific test that support the Theory of Evolution. If you are right, why are there so many websites arguing: "Evolution is not JUST a THEORY, it is scientific fact" if they are one and the same? I'm sorry for your unwavering faith in a theory.
you argue from how many sites there are denying evolution?...
thank god(lol) the catholic church didnt have acces to the internett when copernicus was trying to tell people the world was not at the center of "creation".
there is NO "proof" disprooving evolution,, and observation backs u the "theory"
(its called theory in the same sense the theory of gravity is a "theory")
Thank you for all of your replies to my previous comment. Here are the two definitions for "Theory"
1:The analysis of a set of facts in their their relation to one another
(An educated guess)2:abstract thought or speculation
So where does that leave us? In a tight spot I guess, because you say a theory is a fact, well why does deduction have to play a part? Why not carry out repeatable trials and experiments that yield the same results by different researchers?
This song is beautiful, one of my favorites of all time.
brmadman4455 1 month ago
@2:40 Nice. The Super Group in the Grand Canyon, the tilted layers under the level layers proving the earth is millions of years old. And my favorite part of the canyon.
gregrutz 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
god has no proof its all masn imagination
Warxyph 5 months ago
I can't understand why so many people believe in science when there's perfectly good fairy tales to have faith in that have been around so much longer and SAY that they're true! That's proof! Now let's go kill our families if they don't believe and torture and mass murder those who have different views.
Ryakki 8 months ago
I am so pleased that there are others out there that seem to get it. Thank you cdk
JosephPatrickMcmahon 9 months ago
Atheism is the nihilistic belief in...nothing. Something coming from nothing is irrational, illogical and impossible. The chances of an accidental universe capable of supporting life are 1 in 10 to the 10th power to the 123rd power (calculations by famed British Mathematician Roger Penrose), making atheism's claim a mathematical impossibility.
moonlightbateman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So, why do you evangelize?
EltonJThe 1 year ago
Wow, this guy just does not believe in half truths. It MUST be all or nothing. And by the way based on every human I know, I would not put human reason on such a high pedestal.
bpechek 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I am sorry, i have to quote arsjth
"u dont hav2deny any of these things becos most of them r just evolutionary spin attached2observations."
I can't even believe they still teach evolution in schools to be honest. It is highly deceptive.
accident777 1 year ago
@accident777
Please explain to me what you find deceptive about the teaching of evolution. I find your statement quite ridiculous considering evolution is the backbone of modern biology and genetics.
baudiirocz 1 year ago 12
@baudiirocz I know biologists who secretly deny evolution because they find this theory to be a scientific fairy tale but in fear of losing their job they still teach it And these guys are not creationists but unbiased ,honest,and THINKING scientists ,they even laugh at R.Dawkins ,they think that he s a clown or a media whore who is afraid of losing his fame witch in fact could diminish his erectile streght (Sorry his God Dellusion book is intellectualy poor )
SonofJaphet 1 year ago
@accident777
Did you even watch the video?
generalataris 1 year ago
@accident777
you think they should teach old folk stories magic and myths? idiot
ginobene1 1 year ago
@ginobene1 old folk stories and magic myths IS running around telling people we came from monkeys
accident777 1 year ago
@accident777 old folk stories and magic myths is telling people we came from monkeys
accident777 1 year ago
Comment removed
accident777 1 year ago
Yes, I do deny logic and human reason - but only
on Thursdays. So you're way way off! :-/
OgeronimonominoregO 1 year ago
they must deny MRSA to
JM12101 1 year ago
The theory does seem very logical and it makes plenty of sense scientifically. For me personally, there are still too many holes in it to be accepted as absolute truth but I feel it's a definite possibility.
GinnyStoleMyMan 1 year ago
Excellent and informative video. Wish their was more views.
decoren45 1 year ago
u dont hav2deny any of these things becos most of them r just evolutionary spin attached2observations.
homologous structures.
just prove theres no otha explanation 4 homologous structures.just prove that a common designer wldnt use similar structures.Vestigial organs hardly prove that new organs r growing or evolving. show us the bird that developed a partial wing not 1 that lost the use of the 1s it had.A wing? y would u assume it used 2 b4 flying?
cos thats what winds r designed4!
obvious?
arsjth 1 year ago
30 secs in2 this video u r sprouting off crap already.
deny evolution but happily accept the rest science has to offer.
y not if its based on fact. y would u deny what is proven?
Then u try and link rather disingenuously evolution to computers, cars, planes & medicine.
How ridiculous!
you have embarrassed yourself above and beyond the call of duty already.
just make up a video called 'strawmen all evolutionists should feel free to use'.
creationists accept evolution but not common ancestry.
arsjth 1 year ago
i dont think its evolution per se that bothers people. its the idea that it denies the existence of god not by choice but by evidence. god created everything out of nothing. evolution says that everything started at something and then moved on or was pushed out of the way. i mean if evolution is such a terrible thing, that it goes against everything you have been told, then i guess it truly is just a theory. and btw, isnt the rapture supposed to happen soon or am i just ignorant?
cheomire 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The peppered moth is not valid its a hoax but you need this lie to prove your zombie science
Evolution is not science but if we refute it you call us retards even though some of us have Phd s in physics,biology,mathematics,medicals,philosophy,engineering etc.. you say that we are retards well i realise that you are brainwashed and you cannot admit your errors or hoaxes
Evolution is a parasite to science which you corrupted .God gave us a morsell of His science to help us live on this planet
SonofJaphet 2 years ago
Be gone troll. Come back when you are better educated on the subject.
baudiirocz 2 years ago 17
@baudiirocz I learned it in school ,i thought that evolution was how we came to be but later as an investigator i questioned this theory because of its many lies that evolutionists spreaded in textbooks (Pepper moth,Piltdown man,Lucy etc.)So i ask myself this question:Why did they use lies to claim their theory as fact?An honest scientist would question it as opposed to ascientist who only wants fame so that he will get his p&%^s sucked by a drunk cheerleader (R.Dawkins is one of those )
SonofJaphet 1 year ago
@baudiirocz Sad thing, though, is that he's not even trolling. lol
ASubHumanOfSociety 1 year ago
@baudiirocz go dig in the desert and find the missing link at long last. then we will talk about education vs theory.
accident777 1 year ago
@accident777 actually they found the missing link...in fact they found dozens of them. many of them are listed in this video. talkorigins go there
tuseroni 1 year ago
You do realise how hypocritical your post is right? You're the one refusing to give up your bronze age religions and fairytales Evolution is science, wether you like it or not. It is by no means refuted, it's stronger then ever. just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean it didn't happen. If you just want to bury your head in the sand and be ignorant instead of thinking, fine. but please leave the thinking minds in our society do their job: make the world a better place.
Nydracommander 2 years ago
@Nydracommander I understand evolution they fuckin cram it in my mind in school but as a science i find it not valid unlike other sciences ..Information is information in order to reproduce itself a cell must have a code and this code must come from an intelligent being because that code cannot be made by itself and chance is not scientific unless you have faith in chance (i dont) like most evolutionist have.Can you tell me the mathematical probability of a single living cell forming from dust?
SonofJaphet 2 years ago
@SonofJaphet The mathematical probability of a cell forming sponaneously from dust is nigh infinitely improbable.....good thing thats not what evolution says (exact opposite of chance...ie natural SELECTION)
boorens18 2 years ago
@SonofJaphet in 2009 scientists formed self-replicating RNA in a lab. They only used heat, electricity, and chemicals that would have been around before life on earth. The probability that genetic code can come from non-life? One out of one. Be well. -BR
BrooklynRagtag 1 year ago 2
@Nydracommander. Will They make the world a better place. They didn't do a good job so far.. hihi
DjTankus 2 years ago
really? the invention of antibiotics alone reduced GOBAL deaths by 30%!! it's hard to wrap your mind around how massive that is. life expectancy has skyrocketed. Infant death has almost been eliminated. famine has disappeared. We have worldwidecommunication, firefighterplanes, tsunamiwarning systems... We no longer need to labor all day long so we have to enjoy our lives. how has science not made the world a better place?
Nydracommander 2 years ago 6
I have to confess that I'm glad there is science in the world and it makes life better for some of us.
But still the earth will surprising human beens with all his powers and we can do nothing about that. Look at Haiti they didn't saw it coming. how is that possible.
DjTankus 2 years ago
that's why we need to let science progress. we may not be able to do it now, but in the future we might devise an earthquake warning system, so we can get those people out of harms way - earthquakes don't kill people, collapsing buildings do. for now we'll have to resort to building expensive erathquake resistant buildings, which are hard to come by in places like haiti sadly.
Nydracommander 2 years ago
Okay that's reasonable.. I believe in science like I believe in faith and thinking that they have to go along with each other instead of ignoring each other.
DjTankus 2 years ago
@DjTankus - "I believe in science like I believe in faith"
Now that's an oxymoron. Not only that but an incredibly stupid and uneducated comment. To believe is to have faith, and all faith by definition is blind. I don't BELIEVE in the things science discovers to be true, I ACCEPT them as facts.
"they have to go along with each other instead of ignoring each other"
There was this one time period when "science" and faith didn't ignore eachother. We call it the DARK AGES!
byteresistor 2 years ago
@byteresistor You "believe" to much! Believes have nothing to do with science! RAmen!
anonimoculto 1 year ago
i'm curious though, what you have to say to all the transitional forms presented by this video. I'm also curious why you say god gave us science. Science is the opposite of god. If you reject evolution, you reject science. you can't have it both ways.
Nydracommander 2 years ago 3
@SonofJaphet shoo troll...no spreading misinformation. This is a "facts and things you can back up with science" video only!
boorens18 2 years ago
It's clear that your place is in school, a primary school, not here! Don't you know? There are ambients where child are not allowed!
anonimoculto 1 year ago
@SonofJaphet 99% of ALL scientists use and benefit from the evolutionary theory. Less than 1% use creationism.
How much of the worlds science and technology has the 1% contributed with?
simonwedege 1 year ago
@simonwedege Oceanography,Gravity law,Hydrology,Astromony,Mathematics,
Bacteriology,Energitics,Isotopic Chemistry,Optical Mineralogy,Celestial Mechanics
Do you want more of this 1%?
SonofJaphet 1 year ago
@SonofJaphet And they use creationism in their field, how exactly?
There have not been a single theory coming from the creationist scientists, ever. Creationism has not contributed in any field with more knowledge on how the world works.
simonwedege 1 year ago
@simonwedege Do you want a list of scientists who believed that God created the Universe and made contributions to science ?Ill give you one name Lord Rayleigh who invented dimensional analysis .The problem with evolutionists is that a scientist who have many Phd s decides to reject evolution automatically becomes a fake scientist ,a retard even though he is more knowlegable than most of you ,ithis is hypocrisy or scientific censorship and that makes you like nazis
SonofJaphet 1 year ago
@SonofJaphet No, I wanted to know which scientists who use "creation science" or "intelligent design" in their field, instead of evolution? And why they haven't come up with a single theory?
There have been many scientists who believe or at some point believed in God. But that doesn't make them creationists, including young earth creationists.
simonwedege 1 year ago
@SonofJaphet A Ph.D. doesn't become a fake scientist if they reject evolution. But there must be some good reasons to reject one of the most well documented theories in science, which is being used in almost all fields of science.
There is no censorship. Maybe you confuse "peer-review" with "censorship"? It's certainly no the same thing. But science isn't a democratic process. Scientists don't get to vote on which theory they like best. It's all about evidence and testing.
simonwedege 1 year ago
@SonofJaphet "some of us" NOT YOU! The ones that do, do not deny evolution,but include in "God's plan". and do not envision a God as a actual entity but a figurative one, an explanation of the unknown, or as Einstein, the constants of the universe.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@NOmeansnoFAN Its not my problem if you believe in a pseudo-scientific fairy tale
I understand your position though ,you paid hundreds of dollars to learn this zombie science it is normal to defend it since you wasted your money on this crap
SonofJaphet 1 year ago
@SonofJaphet Name one Biology professor, other than Behe, who believes in creationism. Evolution is accepted by about 99.8% of scientists (you know, the guys who actually study it.) In comparison, there are 4 times as many historians who reject the holocaust as there are biologists who reject evolution.
Ninvus2 4 months ago
@Ninvus2 Behe is not a creationist but an honest scientist and me i ve studied Darwinism,i acccepted this theory as fact but later i discarded it because it has no proof only suppositions so for me evolutionism is just a philosophy that dates back to Antique Greece (Anaximander,Empedocles,Plato Aristotle) who got it from the Vedic Hindoos .As for biologists there are more than .2% who dont believe it because they dont want to lose their jobs or have their career ended
SonofJaphet 4 months ago
The fact of the matter is that evolution is completely emasculated until it answers the question of the origin and existence of life. It is the single most important question. Without a suitable answer to this question evolution will remain the Scientific Eunuch!
rplende 2 years ago
@rplende
Sorry, but that's complete and total bollocks! No other word for it.
SLRL1A1 2 years ago
So where did this life factor come from and where is your proof for it. We know one empirical fact about life and that is that it comes from something living. The first human life came from a living God.
rplende 2 years ago
@rplende
Hi. I'm doing a project on the 12th century. I'd like to ask you a few questions!
SLRL1A1 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Show me one instance of non living atoms ( of which all the universe and life in it are made) becoming living things by nothing but the forces of nature. You can't even do it in the laboratory with all the high tech equipment and human resources. Now just tell me where it has happened or show me where has happened that non life gave rise to life. If you can't answer this simple question honestly you have no right to palaver on about some concocted story of origins called evolution.
rplende 2 years ago
show me any evidence that supports the that universe was created in six day by some all-mighty sky daddy, how a rib can be turned into a woman, how a bush can light on fire without burning.
we don't know everything in science, but we can separate educated guesses based on empirical evidence from pure bullshit written in some book 3000 years ago, i think i'm with the scientists on this one
by the way, bacterial life has been created in labs by scientists.
PrinceOfDoubt 2 years ago
Nobody can prove anything empirically about the origin of life including evolutionists because no human alive today was there at the beginning. However you know as well as I do that it takes something Living to produce new life. That a Living God created "Life" is far more plausible than non living atoms (and where did they come from?) being able to form themselves into living things!
rplende 2 years ago
it still doesn't mean we should believe in fairy-tails. the reason I accept the theory of evolution is because it is the best theory we have to explain the diversity of life on earth, and it has withstood attacks on to today.
there is also nothing observable to tell us that intelligence created living matter anyway, so how can you assert that you know for sure it did? like you said we just don't know
and if intelligence created life, what created the intelligence? i doubt we'll ever know
PrinceOfDoubt 2 years ago
You keep saying atoms like that's magic word. I hate to break it to you but inorganic sources produce organic atoms (basically any molecule with carbon) , that have never been part of anything living. From there's it not a big step to amino acids, the building blocks of life.
How the first living thing came together is a mystery. One scientists are determine to solve. What will you say when they solve it? And do it again and again under different conditions? Make up your lies now, it's coming.
bahramthered 2 years ago
Living God created "Life"
How do you know? Were you there?
gregrutz 2 years ago
How do you know, were you there, did you see it?
gregrutz 2 years ago
Did you eat lunch? Some none living atoms maybe. Then turned them into living you.
You violated the 2nd Law of thermodynamics !
gregrutz 2 years ago
No bright spark! Food which is derived from plant "Life" doesn't make living things. It only sustains that which has been given life!
rplende 2 years ago
Facts in science must be VERIFICABLE, not REPRODUCTIBLE! But put some soap into water, and than put a irregular structure, like a rock, o even twisted wire in and out! What you have! A membrane, much similar to cell membrane! The phisical principle is the same... So, one problem less! Put some phospholipids in water an see wath happens naturally.
anonimoculto 1 year ago
Ah, Tchaikovsky. Brilliant.
Iwannabubbletube 2 years ago 3
Although this a great video with very detailed information (facts), there is one thing I disagree with which was at 8:29. I think that all people who deny evolution do so because of ignorance, especially, the ignorance of being unwilling to accept the truth when it doesn't fit into their beliefs.
justinjsaley 2 years ago 5
I think your only disagreement then is that they say "most" while you say "all." Admittedly you are correct though. Peopel who deny evolution are ignorant in one way or another. Some may just be uneducated yet others are brainwashed into ignoring the evidence. It's a bit sad. Sometimes I feel as though we are Galileo, confident and proven in his facts yet not believed because others would rather accept fairytale than reality.
baudiirocz 2 years ago 5
Thanks for your feedback and I totally agree with what you have said.
justinjsaley 2 years ago 2
@baudiirocz Those who deny evolutionism are more intelligent because they have the nerve to questio this outdated theory
SonofJaphet 4 months ago
Excellent Video - Can't understand why so few views
Artifactorfiction 2 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There are no transitional species found in the fossil record. There are no proven scientific test that support the Theory of Evolution. If you are right, why are there so many websites arguing: "Evolution is not JUST a THEORY, it is scientific fact" if they are one and the same? I'm sorry for your unwavering faith in a theory.
ndlynn08 2 years ago
you argue from how many sites there are denying evolution?...
thank god(lol) the catholic church didnt have acces to the internett when copernicus was trying to tell people the world was not at the center of "creation".
there is NO "proof" disprooving evolution,, and observation backs u the "theory"
(its called theory in the same sense the theory of gravity is a "theory")
evilblades 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank you for all of your replies to my previous comment. Here are the two definitions for "Theory"
1:The analysis of a set of facts in their their relation to one another
(An educated guess)2:abstract thought or speculation
So where does that leave us? In a tight spot I guess, because you say a theory is a fact, well why does deduction have to play a part? Why not carry out repeatable trials and experiments that yield the same results by different researchers?
ndlynn08 2 years ago