Added: 4 years ago
From: leprechaun2011
Views: 21,991
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (91)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I play it all the time, it is quite short.

  • "The game is kind of short.. It can be beaten in sever hours!". Wow, really? If only they'd give games lower ratings for this nowadays, hell, most triple A games are less than 6 hours long if you take your time.

  • good game rember when it first came out not as dark as aod so gt boring easy but u dont get meny games better than this

  • just got the trilogy today out of a bet i won and so far legend is fucking awsome (havent played the other to yet though) but i cant wait

  • OMG THIS GUYS VOICE IS SO BORING

  • @Daproblem187 Then don't watch it...duh (look at that=, the answer is so obvious that I actually used that word for the first time in years)

  • I think the visual environments are beautiful in this game, as well as the story and emotional scenes from suspense/adrenaline to disappointment/satisfaction. It deserves a higher rating.

  • just ordered the ps2 version

  • just say location not abreviate it with local 

  • @BeLiZeAnBaLLeR517 locale is a word not an abbreviation 

  • This game was probably the best one for the xbox360 other than anniversary which is an amazing remake of the original :) and I'd give the game an 8.5

  • Tomb raider legend or underworld?

  • wow, the influence of prince of persia is so obvious

    horrible review btw...not the score but the content and presentation

    i think gamespot were the only ones to video review this game, the only reason for watching this

  • @ambarkumar

    First 3D prince of persia(1999)Prince of persia 3D

    First Tomb raider (1996) Tomb Raider

    If anything Prince of persia was influenced by Tomb raider.

  • @777term maybe you are right...i have played no tomb raiders(except one when i was a little kid and didn't have any idea who the hot girl was, don't even remember the name of that title now)

    i was only referring to the way she jumps those horizontal poles, the character animation is exactly the same

  • @ambarkumar

    Thanks for clearing that up.

  • i got this game for only like...2 bucks for the pc and i really enjoy it i never got into tomb raider mainly because i didnt understand it i have the ps1 version of tomb raider 2 that was the first one i played and i didnt even get past the first level (not including the manor) yea i suck ass at tomb raider lol but this one seems alot easier to get into so i like this one quite a bit its interesting and fun

  • This review is horrible. Not the score, I couldnt really care less, but this reviewer is not interesting at all. He also says Legend with an s. It sounds like Im listening to an amateur review of this game, I expect more from a gaming website. For shame gamespot.

  • i'd say a 7.8 is an ok score for this...

    i loved the game.. but as he said, i did beat it in around 7 hours.. and have not played it since... and the puzzles were not varied enough...

    still.. i loved the game ;D

  • Play it once? I've counted how many times i've replayed and it came to 13! And that is not including when i play over level by level.

  • play it once and forget it ?! i play it over and over again and it makes fun every time ^^

  • 7.8?...maybe 8.7 xD anyway...in my opinion this is the best tomb raider game

  • 10/10 man this game is awsome ive beat it on the ps2 and i wana do it again

  • GameSpot like to be harsh with their reviews, because they want the reputation of being "the site to impress." They probably enjoyed it more than a 7.8, but simply don't want to admit it in case it ruins their "reputation." Nearly all other game review sites gave it a much higher score - which will probably please GameSpot. It's easily worth more than a 7.8 for its sheer entertainment value, even if it is far too short.

  • My fav tomb raider game

  • not 7.6

    is 9.0

  • wow 7.8 thats not right its worth better than that i mean its at least  9.0

  • I think the Tomb Raider are overrated.

    These games have so much replay value in my opinion.

    One of the games that i ACTUALLY want to replay

  • @HorrificHavok you think tomb raider is overrated?!?!

    And yet you talk about it like it was underrated O_O

  • @Sbrff Loll yea spelling mistakes >.<

  • This reviewer's a friggin' idiot. This was one of the best games I've ever played on PS2 so far, and the time trials and unlockable contents gave it tons of replay value for me.

  • WOW this review sucks

  • @rasofthedead YES

    not 7.8

    is 9.0!

  • i like this game but I don't feel that any of the new tomb raider games hold up to the original games like 12345 and 6. I wish that they had kept the Beta version, it looked a hell of a lot better

  • i wish they had this on for ps3, but its cool i guess since i can play it on PC. just use Xpadder and a ps2 controler and it plays well enough :p

  • y r people so fuckin retarded if you move the camera whill platforming its gonna go nuts cause its trying to focus on the jump not on lara xp

  • does it have online

  • which do you guys think is better?legend or the anniversary version?

  • Kinda hard to choose because this is more of a new adventure whereas Anniversary is a remake of the first game. Which do you prefer?

  • A hard decision. Legend has its problems but its still a fun game, but I think I enjoyed Anniversary a bit more.

  • @jannyboi808 legend

  • The realistic graphics in Legend are a nice thing, but I sill prefer the older games, they just have that certain charm that the new games don't. I still even play the first TR sometimes, I'm halfway through Unfinished business right now.

  • good game?

  • Definitely, if you're a fan of the Tomb Raider series ;)

  • Laaraa craafft! This dude sounds like a sheep

  • imagine a uncharted/tomb raider cross over!? where you can play co op campaign as nathan drake and lara croft

  • i love this game, the graphics on the ps2 version were pretty good, lara looked great, i don't get why some people thought the ps2 version sucked

  • is the ps3 version any good? i havent found it anywhere, did they not make it for playstation?

  • there's no tomb raider legend for ps3 sadly, only for ps2, xbox360 and pc. i think it's unfair though, especially with what they did to the ps2 version in underworld

  • Exactly, I had a ps1 when I was younger and mastered the Tomb Raider Core series. I bought a PS3 months ago and loved Underworld. I missed out on PS2 completely and recently bought one JUST for Legend and Anniversary.

  • 7.8!!!!???? are you kiddin me it deserves at leat a 9.0

  • @DeMetalMan01 is this better than underworld you think/know?

  • @Ffantasy501 yeh way better

  • @DeMetalMan01 nah the next gen graphics are to oily and everything looks plastic and the gameplay is to short and fast and it gets boring and the game is WAY to short and has a poor story

  • @Jmjgypsy i agree with you, this game was way to short , thats why i say this isnt a good game

  • @DeMetalMan01 At 7.0 hours and no reply "Good" is good enough for this game, I feel. I have every Tomb Raider game going back tot the first, which had the same retailer price and gave you 40 hours plus. Now that's 9.0 material!

  • 360 graphics are really good!

  • @EllaElla001 hell yea

  • I love playing this on PSP, I wish they put as much effort into all games on PSP.

    Tomb raider, GTA and Tekken look and play really well on the system.

    I hope to get Underworld on XBOX 360, people have told me the new one is awesome :)

  • Comment removed

  • yayerz i heart this game :D

  • Too short. Get underworld. NOW

  • one thing to describe her, fit

  • hmm....GAMESPOT gave Tomb Raider Anniversary a 8.5 ....well im gona play Legend too compare it ^_^

  • its a GREAT GAME but it once you beat it it doesnt have the "fun" factor like say the japan level in legend but som parts are realllly fun but im not gona go through a whole level for one part

  • first try to clear tomb raider legend for 100% than try underworld its a contine

  • Legend had some interesting level designs, but it should have expanded on those ideas. For instance, I would have found the Tokyo level much more engaging, if the club was located on the street and Lara had to progress vertically throughout the cityscape to the boss battle/goal.

  • So is this a skip or a buy? - I will have Tomb Raider: Anniversary tomorrow and will probably pick up Underworld.

  • Great game!

  • I prefer legend over anniversary. In legend, Lara has 2 allies, where they watch lara's every move and talk to her. Also, u have a binoculas that is not ordinary and finally, the levels vary and r beautiful, whereas in Anniversary it is pretty much same levels based around purly Egypt.

    Finally, 1 level in legenb is where u get to play on a motorbike, whilst shooting enemies at the same time and controlling the vehicle. Croft manor is the same as anniversary, only slightly varies.

  • I agree with you , although i do like anniversary's croft manor though.

  • shoho0809: let me first say that i also prefer legend over anniversary but only by a slim margin. Now, you do know that anniversary is a remake of the very first TR right? So naturally it wouldnt include Zip and Alister. And in anniversary egypt is only 1/4 of the game. The other levels take place in peru, greece, and the lost island

  • I dont know what all the complaining is about I thought it was a great game..no a fantastic game!

  • Yeah me too, but it was too short

  • Simplistic levels designed around pointless time trials. Invisible "barriers". Useless "unlockables" that add exactly zero to gameplay. Pointless "Simon says" sequences. Annoying "save points" that cause you to replay entire sections if you die. Short playtime.

    How review sites say this game "revitalizes" and "captures the spirit" of the Tomb Raider series is a mystery to me.

    Crystal Dynamics sure know how to screw up an existing series and make it for monkeys holding controllers.

  • u seem to be a one off among the population..

  • if your having to replay whole sections pf the game then maybe you should try to stop dieing

  • this game was a slap in the face for tomb raider fans,no exploration,loss of the sense of total isolation other games in the series had,absurdly short-the whole game is the size of about three of the levels of the original game from 1996,the controll system makes it feel like anything but a tomb raider game. a true turd of a game

  • this game didn't have a good ending

  • Because they left you hanging, their going to continue it in Underworld, well not directly but it will have connections, to legend, so it will answer questions.

  • I think the ending was great. I love how it was a cliff hanger and now I can't wait for Underworld to come out. I'm glad to also know more about Lara's past. Very nice.

  • he is right if u play the game once u will forget about it well u not me i love this game

  • i am bidding on a psp with this game another tomb raider game and spiderman 2 game..probs trade in sm2

  • Greaaat game!!! Played for many times.

  • yeah? i can buy this game for 9 $ should i buy it?

  • Yeah, buy it for the beautiful levels.

  • ah, ok then ;) i'm going 2 buy it :p

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more