JFK assassination Do the Math Part 3B.mp4

[Kens167]

I am assuming you get the 3 deg from the slope of the road. This is accounted for by adding the 3 degrees to the angle of the rifle. We have a visual record through the Zaprueder film. The president was in a normal sitting postion, so the theorem can be used with accuracy.

[xu1997]

If the president was sitting forward 3 deg from the true vertical then the calculation are out by 3 deg. The point I make is the body of the president has to be exactly 0 deg to the vertical in order to accuratly apply the pythagorean thoery. The problem is that we dont know at what angle his body was to the vertical axis.

I would be interested in your thoughts.

[xu1997]

Firstly I would like to say I enjoyed your presentation and I myself am intrigued with this event. I am however concerned with the foundation of your theory ,that being the pathologist report on the angle of the entry/exit wound. Your calculation are accurate but unfortunately they are based on an estimation.

The body of the president is not fixed compared to the buildings in the vicinity so how can an estimated differential angle be related to a fixed building.

[Kens167]

Some speculated that the bullet tumbled, but the forensice pannel of 6 said no, the bullet went in a straight line. No ER doctor could have testified to the tumbling. They didn't have the expertise.The slight elongation was because of the shirt and jackect being dragged slightly into the wound AND because of the angle from nose to end. A tumbling bullet could not rise the 1 degree (not 2). It would be bleeding energy so badly it would have dropped, not risen. (more)

[Kens167]

@DrinkingwFish A tumbling bullet is a most rare item. The only way the wound could be 1 degree above is for there to have been a second shot as recorded (time wise) on the dictabelt recording for the distance the limo traveled between the 2 shots (and the recrding must be adjusted for the additional time the sound traveled).

[tibe2003]

5:40 il nocciolo

[Kens167]

@tibe2003 What ever uyou wanted to say didn't come out. Try again

[themeaningoflife38]

that dale meyers thing is hilarious.He says he's gonna use the Z film to prove the single bullet lie,but in order to that he makes a cartoon.That's why it was on ABC, more lies being fed to the public. ha ha

[justinjoyit13]

I heard that too and there was Ugene Hale Brading caught there getting off the elevator whos got ties to Calos Marcello and HL Hunt, the theres James Files saying Charles Nicoletti was up there. It would explain why the shooters waited till the car turned into Elm St since the TSBD had the best vantage point as the car approached rather than wait till it was moving away. The head shot still looks like a back/front impact to me though- with two shots almost simultaneous. Math/physics on that?

[bobharris77]

@justinjoyit13 I believe you are definitely correct about the Daltex building and Braden. I recently made a comprehensive video about the shooting which also explains the headshot(s).

watch?v=gkAc76n8q44

[Kens167]

Yep. See part 1. It explains it completely. Watch Part 1A for the reason the body goes backwards and to the left. Part 1

b explains where the bullet came from and how I found the location. There will be a slight correction shortly to 1b. It just moves the location up slightly. A very slight oops.

[slappy09]

I could be wrong but I think I remember reading that later on shell from a rifle was found on top of the Dal Tex Building. Does anyone have any information on that? Thanks for "Doing the Math" I stink at math...ahahahaha