Added: 3 years ago
From: shanedk
Views: 7,761
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (406)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Awesome vid!

    But I'd like to state that the religious harm is caused by the Maccabees, who ultimately disabled the Hellenization of the Jews. If they hadn't succeeded (and they were almost to be crushed) there wouldn't even be Christianity nor Islam and Judaism would be gone as well.

  • Add in the effects of statism since its birth (between 5000 and 7500 years ago), and we've probably been held back for at least 6000 years, not the 1200 estimated in this video.

  • @vspqbd Of course, statism and religion were inextricably linked. I don't know of any secular states before the Enlightenment.

  • How do you explain all the order and complexity that we can observe in the universe?

  • @ironman197268 Easily, when you know what physical laws led to it.

  • A major problem is how the bullshit is deeply entrenched into western society. Jesus and Mohammed respectively may have been great moral teachers for their day, and people should model themselves after their heroes in their hobbies, morality, professions, etc., but because of precedent most today have surpassed them. Did Jesus know of utilitarian ethics or Kant's categorical imperative? Emulating Paul Morphy is Chess is a bad idea because of the advancements made since then in chess, and...

  • (cont.) a parallel could also be drawn with morality.

  • religion is humanity's ball-and-chain

  • Ah christianity, single handedly destroying thousands of years worth of knowledge one dark age at a time.

    Note: currently christians are working on a plan to bring the dark ages back, its called creationism, be warned, be wary, and be afraid.

  • Like I said to my friends a few days ago: If it weren't for Christians I'd be living my life long dream as a cyborg fighting space orcs by now.

  • @LostManSays Yep, so you want to live in a different imaginary world eh?

  • A comment to Shanedk - Subscribed ;)

  • @allibyx Why would Christianity be a good source of morality? "Don't wash your hands, it's silly" "We don't need to take care of the enviroment, Jesus will come before global warming anyway!"

  • Some scholars make a case that some of the work of Archimedes (palimpsest) being lost is attributed to a slowing, if not halt, to advancements in math and science. Fundamentalists not only retard their own intellectual growth but when mobilized try to retard societies ability to advance in knowledge.

  • Shane, I'm sure you also recognize that changing history in that respect would change a great many other things. Look at the Mayans and the Aztecs. They had a great understanding of the motions of the stars, but no idea about the various geometries.

    Not all knowledge and discovery could be understandably derived from a past other than the one we have now.

  • @allibyx well that would be a credit with stains. who know we might have been able to figure out how not to pollute. i still think christianity (all religion) is a cancer.

    hey, just sayin.

    peace, lardo444.

  • Stupid Christianity... if not for them Gundams would be real by now...

  • @GeoRyukaiser haha :D

  • THIS VIDEO IS BULLSHIT! you know it was gods hand that put these ideas into there so called scientific minds! blasphemers!!!! nah just kidding. excellent vid.

  • Thank you for this Video. I am building our Home School High School we page and the Introduction to World History revolves around the destruction of the Library at Alexandria. I will be embedding this directly onto the page (if that is alright with you?). I will leave a link to the site on your page here.

  • good1. however if the industrial revolution were to begin 1000 earlier we probably wouldn't be here. the skies would be black.

    just sayin.

    peace, lardo444.

  • @lardo444 Why? They're not black now.

  • @shanedk i think they will be. we haven't learned what pollution will do in the long run. i'm not an environmental activist. but it looks dim for us. when they spilled millions of gallons of oil into the gulf and then claimed they cleaned it all up, HA. they really do think we are stupid. i live on the gulf of mexico, and i've seen all kinds of declining species from normal pollution, but the need for oil will destroy the oceans. along with the sky.

    have a peaceful stay.

    lardo444.

  • @shanedk they are where i am now cause i live in a city, so not many stars, and its night time, and theres a storm so no moon.

  • @deathman1021 Only at night, I'm guessing.

  • @shanedk indeed, i just felt like being a smartass, its kind of a hobby.

    Its like being a troll but theres no hate involved so its cool

  • @deathman1021 Ever heard of a thing called light pollution? It over powers the stars no matter what sort of smog there is.

  • @coolhaztech yes i know what light pollution is, im just being a smartass, cause a previous person said the sky would be black if the industrial revolution started sooner, in no way recognizing that it would not have ended the same way it did if it had started sooner and just assuming it would have gone the entire time and history would otherwise be unchanged, so i was being a smartass i know why there is not many stars to see at night in a city

  • @lardo444 Yeah so good thing that happened right? To asume somthing like you are stating with no evidence is just as dogmatic as religions. Yer dumb...... just sayin

  • @sstan1337 well ssstan i can't argue with you. i am dumb.

    just sayin.

    peace, lardo444.

  • They did not actually follow the scientific method as we know it, in fact the intellectual contributions which allowed such a thing to develop arose in the Middle Ages which you seem to think were so static. If anyone is to blame here, it is the Muslim caliph Al-Ghazali for claiming that science went against the Koran and used his absolute power to end the learning of the Islamic world. I am not saying that religion has never interfered with scientific progress, but I am saying this is skewed.

  • @bigbear6161 Could you elaborate on how the scientific method arose during the Middle Ages? By whom? Because as far as I know, the Greeks were the first to establish some form of scientific method. Although initially, they believed measurements were solely for artists and craftsmen, famous figures such as Aristotle emphasized the importance of empiricism. I know my three comments were really long, but I would appreciate if you replied :) And also, I agree, this is a bit skewed since (continued)

  • @bigbear6161 (Damn it, now there's four replies to you). I agree, this video is a bit skewed. Of course, I agree with it on how Christianity influenced and prolonged this shadow on knowledge, and how Christianity was, indeed, a factor on the declination of Rome (And those times), but shanedk should have elaborated a bit more on other topics. That's what I prefer, anyways. Nevertheless, I like how he incorporated history here ;)

  • You're also forgetting that the collapse of the Roman Empire had a lot to do with the decline of learning. The Christians were one of the few literate people in the Early Middle Ages. (There is a discrepancy in this video: you claim that the Muslims somehow saved scrolls from a library that was burned 300 years before their time. How is that possible?) And Greek philosophy and mathematics was not science as we know it, i.e. the empirical method. They only had thought experiments. (*continued*)

  • @bigbear6161 Hi there :). I just wanted to clarify some things with your statements. You should replace Christians with ''the clergy in the monasteries'' since no normal Christians could read or write. In addition, the Roman Empire collapsed (not really because of learning) but from other factors as well. Not to mention that the Roman Empire was split into two, there were also economic troubles, and military troubles (as there were not enough land for all of the soldiers) continued...

  • @bigbear6161 What I mean by the military troubles is that, they promised their soldiers land to farm when they retire. Obviously, there is only so much land (so you can see that troubles). Another question. The video said that Muslims invaded and took hold of Alexandria in 642 AD. Why are you suggesting that the Muslims appeared 300 years after that? Are you implying that Muslims first ''appeared'' (for the lack of a better term) in around 900-1000 AD? (I'm really confused about that).

  • Now, I understand the point that you are trying to make here, but you're overlooking quite a bit of stuff. Now, the progress of non-Greek and Roman civilizations is handwaved away by the fact that none of them had comparable Greek philosophy-- but even accepting that, there are some problems with this. One is that the Library of Alexandria would have already been destroyed at least once; if it had been rebuilt before Hypatia's time, many ancient books were probably already lost. (*continued*)

  • Also, "why don't we know more" Maybe you should look into the use of fluoride in water and in toothpaste. Hitler used fluoride to dumb down the concentration camp prisoners. Our government uses it to dumb us down. (fluoridealert [dot] org) Or maybe you should address the fact that alcohol consumption stunts and prohibits brain development, or the fact that smoking kills brian cells, or the chem-trails in the sky, or the drugs, toxins, and hormones in the food we eat. You are so naive.

  • But obviously, thanks you to your stunningly accurate research in your video, it must be because of one's personal views that is the reason we are so dumb... I wonder if this lack of knowledge applies to you too? Instead of getting so mad and offensive (which by the way is a defense mechanism, which in this case occurs when your own personal view is challenged and you aren't quite smart enough to accept anything other than your own "lack" of knowledge) do some research.

  • FYI, I have already clicked the down thumb, since that is what you seem to do to all the post that challenge you mentally.

  • I read from Lloyd DeMause that the Psycho-history explanation for why we had the Renaissance was because of the end of swaddling in child-rearing practices.

    Is that plausible?

    I asked Lord T Hawkeye about this video, and he said that he's seen this video, and that it was also true that the ruling Christians (at least during that time) were really good at child abuse.

  • @vspqbd There may be. It's known that movement in early infancy has a lot to do with neural development, especially in coordination between the two hemispheres of the brain. It makes sense that restricting that movement might inhibit neural development.

  • Comment removed

  • Unfortunately, the greeks had a failed political system.

    *sighs*

  • Shanedk,

    I was wondering what your sources on the issue of Theophilus' role in the destruction of the library of Alexandria are? I can't find any that state what you did.

    FYI - I'm an atheist and an ex-Christian, (so I'm surely no apologist for Christianity) I'm just absolutely committed to rigorous scholarship.

  • @dissonantsonorant Yes, I too would like to know where all of your sources are, because apparently you just want people to blindly believe what you are saying in your videos. And so far it is working! Oh, and be careful about saying anything that is relatively true... it will get down thumbed. LoL

  • And this is why, taking christianity as anything but a joke, is ignorance.

  • You rock, Shanedk, you rock! ☼♥☼

  • Thanks Christianity for fucking up human progression on an epic scale, all for the selfish reason of having your ghost being able to party with your imaginary friend in the sky for eternity.

  • @TheHomelessCripple And don't forget Judaism. The monotheistic seed of all the degenerate Abrahamic religions.

  • In 1492, Columbus might have blasted off to Mars to explore another planet instead of discovering the New World full of Indian savages. Oh, what might have been!

  • According to Wikipedia "The word size may refer to how big something is. In particular:... Dimensions: length, width, height, diameter, perimeter, area, volume "

  • @sxdirtbikedudemx

    Obvious troll is obvious.

  • you made a mistake in this video. You said the ratio of the size of the earth to the moon is 3.7 to 1. its closer to 50:1, it has 3.7 times the diameter.

  • @interstate317

    By size, I think that's what he meant, dude.

  • Diameter = size.

  • @shanedk

    Volume = size.

  • No, volume = space.

  • @shanedk

    my apologies,

  • i've never witnessed such a case of self-ownage

  • and you never will, because its all in your head.

  • Yes, it is in my head, as well as on youtube

  • Fuck Christianity.

  • I think I am going to make a video blaming all of the world's stupidity and misguided information on fat white people with glasses. Because if you really do think about it, fat white people with glasses have been the leading cause for our misguided information.

  • Imagine if the Christian dark ages didn't happen, and in place of it, we had an enlightenment revolution, coupled with what we know now as Austrian (Free Market) economics.

  • @Surhotchaperchlorome Don't do that. I'm just going to be pissed off that we could have at least had an instant cure for obesity by now, much less the ability to upgrade our bodies with super-awesome cybernetic alternatives.

  • Sorry...

  • @Surhotchaperchlorome It's okay. Just makes you think, sometimes. I tend to see this movie as a grave marker for the future that could've been, although that would probably more fittingly be descriptive of the ruins of the library at Alexandria, if they still existed.

  • They didn't exist because we didn't yet have the technology to pull it off. He was ahead of his time. We needed to be able to pull off things like electrical generation and internal combustion to make his inventions a reality. The IR was about a LOT more than mass production.

  • I don't think you are getting the point... you cannot just take one historicle event, and then blame all of histories "development" on one type of religon. You could do that with ANY religon, or Ethnic Group, and ect...

  • But this WASN'T just one historical development; this was the systematic, wholesale destruction of learning and information by what was at the time the world's superpower.

  • ... And it wasn't the first time that it was done in history either. I still don't see why you think or any of the other viewers think that we would have "flying cars" and "pills that cure obesity" or "cy-borg human parts" or even that we would live longer??? And again, you could blame any type of religion, ethnic group, or civilization for where we are today. You act like the Roman's, Greek's, Hindu's, Budhist, Athiest, Pagans, Catholics, Morman's ect... had no part in history?

  • In the BIG picture, Religion does not have anything to do with it... regardless of someones religion, they are still HUMAN, and still desire Power, Money, ect... Also most KINGS adopted religion in order to gain "control" over the masses, or acceptence of the "people" - OBAMA on CAMERA has claimed that he is apart of SIX different religions. (Ex: he said he is christain, muslim, ect...)

  • So what would make one think that this hasn't been done in the past. I am not deffending "Christianity" because honestly RELIGION is man made. All I am trying to point out to you is how narrow minded the video is. You are pointing out one historicle event and blaming EVERYTHING on it with disregards to EVERY other historicle event that has ever taken place. Forget about the Ceasar's, Napolean's, Stalin's, Hitler's, ect... cause they have had no part in history.

  • @sxdirtbikedudemx

    /watch?v=6PaHcZUHI00

  • I'm not aware of any of them destroying the whole of the learning of an entire civilization, no.

  • well then I guess people were pretty stupid back then... or the King had some type MIB device that wiped people's minds clean. Or maybe when he destroyed the books, the "knowlege" or memories in peoples heads went with it. :) The Odyssey / The Illiad were told by word of Mouth for HUNDREDS of years before they were finally written down.

  • I can see though that I am just wasting my time, because appearently you are not as bright as I thought that you were. Just wish you knew some of the things that I did, maybe you wouldn't be so ignorant. So, now that you have blamed "Christianity" for where we are in today's world... what are you going to do about it? LoL Maybe I will try to give myself a down thumb to save yourself the "click" LoL

  • You realize that we only have a fraction of what Homer, Sophocles, and others wrote, due to this very destruction?

    If you think that individual memory has anything to do with it, you're either stupid or deluded. Writing is the ONLY way we've been able to progress. You destroy writing, you destroy human progress. Period.

  • You think you can regenerate all of human progress with your intellect???

    Go ahead: I'd like to see you try. Build a nuclear reactor without referencing ANY writings at all.

  • Enough people can, with enough time.

    You're sure going through a hell of a lot to avoid the proof that you're completely wrong.

  • How were the resources not available? It's not like there's suddenly a lot of stuff on the planet that wasn't there before.

  • Great video dude!

    Keep up the good work.

    I enjoyed this one very much.

    I knew about the christians burning the alexandria library...sad thing...Humanity would be much more evolved and in peace if they would have not done this horrible thing.

  • I think I come back to re-watch this video more than any other on youtube.

  • Dude!

    Finally I'll have something to show to everyone who says that science is destructive.

    Thank you so much for the incredible vid.

    And as to where we might've been today...

    I'm thinking of the SS Enterprise back at the 1500's, and maybe right now, we would've started colonizing new planets, and dicovered how to connect them by building a grid of stargates, much like the subways we have in most major cities...

  • There's no doubt in my mind about any of this. What makes me sick about Christianity and Abrahamic thinking in general is that they're hell bent on destroying anything and everything just to keep a strangle hold on the masses.

    But here's what makes it worse: Christianity didn't simply take power from the masses, the masses gave it to them willingly. The collective mind is a powerful thing. This is something the churches no doubt know. Only WE can end this.

  • when religion was respected times were called The Dark Ages. if u like religion an brainwashing try living in a theocratic country. stalin was a dictator, democracy did not exist in russia. rowanrox u are proof of the saying- 'little knowledge is dangerous'. thank ur religious conditioning, from childhood, for that.

  • rowanrox, hateful libelous comments are NOT allowed on this channel. Your comment was deleted. First warning.

  • latest family guy episode shows a reality where christainity never existed and we are 1000 years more advanced

  • It's RELIGIOUS people who keep threatening nuclear war. It's RELIGIOUS people who keep denying Global Warming. Talk to the fucking mirror, pal.

  • Ha! Global warming is a farce... we are coming out of an "ICE AGE" according to the United States Geolgist Association. Also if you were to take a Geology class like I suggested previously, you would see the history of the earths temperature. Global Warming... we got over 2 inches of Snow this year in SOUTHERN TEXAS...

  • @sxdirtbikedudemx

    I just tried to google "United States Geologist Association" and there doesn't seem to be such a thing.

  • @aNdYmAtTeR usgs [dot] gov.

  • @aNdYmAtTeR usgs . gov

  • Universities were started in ancient Greece. They were repressed during the Christian era.

  • Yes, with the church fighting it tooth and nail...

  • I'm a christian, and I approve of this video.

    I think it somewhat ironic that the religious dogma shanedk talks about isn't all that dissimilar from the religious dogma of the pharasees. Take from that what you will.

  • Concerning the Library I wonder was there really a library by that time,when it was considered JuliusCaesar did the most damage?AlexandrianChristianswe­re famous forteachingphilosophy in their ownschools, giving us Gregory of Nyssa, Origen, Gregory Nazienzus, Athanasius, Clement of Alexandria, Athenagorus, etc. I find it hard to believe that Christianity alone destroyed the Library, when the earliest Alexandrian Christians (and Jews, like Philo) benefited from it in their schools of thought.

  • I'm sorry, I meant to say benefited from whatever was preserved from the Library...I'm not saying that Christians might have not done it, but to blame it just on Christianity might be far fetched, when scholars seem to lean on the idea that Caesar was to blame, of course by accident, but at the same time, the above Christians I mentioned above were also promoting the reading of such philosophies for a well-rounded education, not just Christian theology.

  • Otherwise, the overall message of the video is well presented.

  • I did quite some research on Cyril of Alexandria.Socrates was a Novatian and a Constantinopitan, with much hatred theologically with Cyril, so Socrates' picture of Cyril is a biased one. John of Nikiu is also obviously biased of Hypatia, too. The question is was the mob associated with Cyril. The answer is unknown. Some people say yes, others no.

  • Let's never forget though, persecuting people who like to do things different and destroying knowledge to maintain the status quo is a fault of man, not religion. Religion was the excuse, not the reason. The reason was control. It's always all about control.

    Tis why I always say to the drug war promoters, if you want to fight dangerous addictions, fight the most dangerous one of all: power junkies.

  • It is the fault or religion. What happens to the aaronites for venerating the golden calf? god commands moses to kill them (Exodus 32:27-28)

    What does Josiah do with the priests of Baal? Read 2 Kings 23. Paul calls other gods daemons. Christians went around desecrating pagan temples and burning them to the ground once the emperors were on their side. These are but a few examples. Read the skeptics annotated bible. It's ilumminating. And don't get me started on the koran.

  • In other words, "this whole believing in god thing's just gotta go for the greater good of humanity"

    See what you just did there? Those sorts of lines of thinking never end well, doesn't matter which side is doing it.

  • It's not a belief in God (or whatever) that has to go; it's dogmatic thinking of ALL kinds.

  • RAmen!

  • It's gotta go but not by force. That is not an option that will create the greatest good.. We just need to keep doing what we are doing. Educate people more and it will go away on its own. Unbelief is growing more and more in the world thanks to mass education.

  • There is only one way religion could ever "go." Discover the meaning of life beyond any shadow of doubt.

    Best of all, that's no guarantee even if you did do that. Good luck!

  • /watch?v=EoiBTdqTsqw ("Anti-Theism")

    I thank you.

  • True, it will never completely go away. Just look at how there are people who believe Elvis is alive. But it probably will become a minority belief just like in many countries in Europe.

  • Aristarchus only devised a logical method of measuring the distance to the sun but moon and did so with a great deal of inaccuracy.

  • The following Wikipedia quote says the link to the Hypatia story is speculation:

    "Carl Sagan, in his series Cosmos, states that the library contained nearly one million scrolls, though other experts have estimated a smaller number (he also gives a speculative description of its destruction, linking it to the death of Hypatia, again without corroboration). No index of the library survives, and it is not possible to know with certainty how large and how diverse the collection may have been."

  • That is not true. He does not say that they were directly linked. But he says the same view of knowledge as dangereous is what was responsible for both. Watch it yourself.

  • Simplisitic. The means of communication for ideas across and smong different cultures did not exist. Though I have no argument that the actions of Christians were a setback, isolation of cultures contributed.

  • How were cultures any less isolated in the 16th century? The means of communication is a RESULT of science, and something else that was set back.

  • You named Bruno. Giordano Bruno? He's a new name to me and I have to get to learn about him. When I read about the demise the the Library of Alexandria, I always feel said but i'm happy that not everything was lost.

  • Yes; he had the audacity to say that not only was the sun the center of our solar system, but that the stars were other suns to that have planets and even human beings on them. So obviously, he HAD to die.

  • We take science for granted but we dont really appreciate how all this came to be...the many lost lives because of some Pope. Galileo is such a sad case as well.

  • Never mind. If history had been any different, none of us would have been born.

  • Wonderful, Now we can get on with stem cell research.

  • Stem cell research was never stopped. The stem cell "ban" was a political myth. I can point you to three firms IN MY STATE that were doing stem cell research while the "ban" was in place.

    It was another meaningless political distraction, on both sides. Nothing more.

  • Thanks, I had no idea that stem cell was going on. Glad you are keeping up with this. Love your vids. Very informative.

  • Fascinating Vid!

  • Excellent video. Excellent.

  • You are truly the best content provider on YT I have seen to this date.....you are easily better than thunderfoot... I cant believe I discovered your channel just 4 days ago...

  • I can't believe I missed this video when you first made it. Excellent analyses. It's only so often that we can lament on "ancient computer programmers" in all seriousness.

  • Wow!

    Great vid, Shane!

    Any diagrams on those ancient steam engines?! Is that for real?!

  • As far as I know, the original documents were lost completely, and we only know of them by reference.

  • Your error is condemning all of Christianity based on the acts of a few. Poor execution by flawed humans does not make the underlying principle at fault.

    The same logic would condemn the Consitution because flawed people still found a way to justify slavery.

    As a person who has found the Bible to be a source of great wisdom and truth, I mostly agree with shanek's last statement. When you find someone attacking science (or religion) as being destructive, start looking at the evidence.

  • I'm not condemning every single Christian; I'm condemning people who hold to ANY sort of dogma--religious, political, or otherwise--to the point of denying honest inquiry.

  • I pity them.

  • I suggest that the nature of mankind itself caused the loss of human knowledge, and not Christianity. All people are born with a sin nature. This also includes people within the church. In the story of Hypatia, shanek mentions that Hypatia and Christians had mutual respect for each other. The bishop, who is a single man, labeled the library pagan and ordered it destroyed. The bishop, despite his title, was not representing Christianity in this case but was a single misguided and flawed man.

  • "I suggest that the nature of mankind itself caused the loss of human knowledge,"

    But the nature of mankind hasn't changed! So why there this big coincidence that we ONLY started making progress when we started relying more and more on science?

    "All people are born with a sin nature."

    Prove it.

    "The bishop, who is a single man,"

    did not personally take part in the murder. IT WAS A MOB. A mob who NEVER would have done that without their dogmatic beliefs.

  • I agree we have made tremendous scientific progress, and science has made my life personally better, but when it comes to mankind I don't think much has changed. There is a dark side to science /technology as well (really it is man's use of technology/science) that has allowed mankind to kill its fellow man in higher numbers (Hitler, Mao). In other words, instead of killing people with a sword, science has now given mankind better tools like the machine gun, or the nuclear bomb.

  • yes it's true that there is a dark side to technology, there is even a possibility that most of our technology has been discovered or invented much earlier than recorded in our 'history books'. The Manhattan project for instance has been overdramatized into making us beleive that the scientists dramatically came together and built this superweapon and with excellent timing dropped it on our enemy nation(s) etc....killing vast numbers of people in only minutes.

  • Having come to this video through shanedk's constitutional video series which I enjoyed and found quite informative, I have to disagree with this particular video's premise. As I understand it, the point of this video is to make a case that the rise of Christianity caused a loss of human knowledge which set back the human race by about ~1600 years.

    Is Christianity really the cause, or was it really just the tragic flaws inherent in all mankind? Why the 500 character limit? See next post.

  • "Is Christianity really the cause, or was it really just the tragic flaws inherent in all mankind?"

    No, because if it were inherent in all mankind, everyone would do it. But it only seems to be those who adhere to a dogma. Why is that?

  • Not the best use of words in the above statement. The above statement should be reworded to say "Is Christianity really the cause, or was it really just the sin nature inherent in all mankind?"

    I should point out that even though people have a sin nature. We as individuals free choice.

  • Yes, but why is it only the ones who follow a dogma that push Jews into ovens or fly planes into buildings?

  • It's always the same people , but in different diguise each time. tehre's nothing new under the sun.

  • I tell you why it took 1500 years to reinvent it.

    The Vatican burned the scientific books of the Greeks, because it was heresy. Creationist are still trying to do is!!!

    Thanks to the occupation of muslims in Spain some of these book were saved.....but discovered very late.

    Just image a world without the Vatican... sigh, we would idd have had the age of enlightenment a 1000 years ago...

  • "it's just that theists generally don't think they are EVER wrong..."

    PART 1

    Well, is there truth or not? That seems to be the question. Are Christians supposed to be open minded? I mentioned several religions previously. Do you think they deserve equal time?"

    The Carthigenians sacrificed their children to Moloch. Should we listen to them? The Muslims beat their wives, suicide bomb their enemies, punish women for being raped, etc. Do you think they might have the truth?

  • PART 2

    Do you think maybe the followers of Zeus have something going to them? And next is the most disgusting of all. Those who deny everything even God. Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all the tyrants in history put together. They are a religion of pure hatred. Do you think we should listen to them?

    I don't think so. You do whatever you want. You're going to anyway. Now did you listen and think or are you knee jerking like you accuse Christians of?