I have a 2010 Speed 3 and it's a killer car. The only thing I disagree with during this review s the statement about the aftermarket community being small. Corksport alone makes a shitload of parts for this car, performance parts.
@AgileMJOLNIR—you raise some good points. However, the tire size still sucks! It's hard to find tires in that size and they are very expensive. Also the MS3 roasts tires and brakes in a big way. —Ross Rapoport
Anyone out there who owns one of these, can you tell me how the long distance comfort is? I know it's more of a sports car and comfort isn't exactly it's forte, but I'm considering this car as my first car after I come out of Tech School. I'll be driving in snow and may find myself in mountainous areas as well. How easy is this car to pick up and become accustomed to its clutch and shifting? I'm not as experienced with driving a manual car yet, but I'm learning (less than a year driving manual)
@Arphalia I've driven this car across country 3 times now, fully packed to the brim with all my stuff....it is great on comfort, never had any issues I can think of. Great seats, alot of storage/hauling capacity, and still quick/nimble. Had it 3 years now and still running like new!
@davidjgmail I have the 9500ci installed, has gotten me out of WAY too many tickets to count, not a single ticket in 3 years yet and I zoom zoom all the time.
@JangoM1 haha sooo muthaf**king true, can't stand those fan boys, i mean i have respect if you car is at Least an SI model but a standard POS CIVIC? -_-....
why do you care if it's peaky. it makes way more power then a civic at half the rpms. the power is more useful and it's faster. how can someone be disappointed to have to stay in the powerband at 3000-5500. 9000 rpms is for ricers.
Good review. I would buy one if I didn't worry me to have a car with much less performance, refinement and ease of driving as soon the road became wet. IMHO, The gap between it's dry and wet abilities is its only downfall.
Does anyone know if you still have to saw off the gas and brake pedals and weld them back at a comfortable angle on Mazdas? We stopped buying them in 1995 due to this issue.
I have a '08 Speed3...and Mazda made a mess of everything! Front end is ridiculous, ugly wheels, cheesy interior materials/colors that just says "cheep".
Its too bad its a mazda, Honda and toyota really need to learn from this. We want the power, just not the ugly car and cheap car company. if it was a Honda it would sell much much more. Then again, they fell off and mazda still has the balls to make this kinda car.
@razioth and there ya go, im not into 5 doors either. I want sports cars. Mazda has never been known for good quality cars either or with great resale. Hyundai is going through the roof on both areas and so im going to be looking at them for future cars as Honda/Toyota doesnt make shit anymore. Mazda is basically ford and well...yah ford.
@Acc0rd79 Wait Honda and Toyota are coming back they will surprise you the Si is going to be resigned all over again for 2013/2014 model year. This why Toyota has Scion to make that happen and they are doing it. They are just getting started after the Tsunamis they had to continue production of current vehicles. New things are brewing. Not giving up on these to brands. Mazda is still a so so car company all their cars look the same. Mazda Speed 6 is gone so why now put the AWD in the Speed 3 ?
@PantstofryPWNZ I agree the 9th generation wasn't what everyone expected. From what I read and heard 2013/2014 a new one is in development now. So I guess we have to wait again to see what happens. I was hoping they would have at least put the 2.3L Turbo that the RDX uses then at least it would have a place in small sport segment again.
thanks charlie@roadflytv i just hope we dont get stuck on the parkway again in snow storm . and just to let you know youre road fly review helped us in making the decision to buy the juke we didnt know how fun the car was to drive.
I have to agree with you Ross I too like the nice touches like storage spaces and cup holders in sporty cars.....there is nothing wrong with adding a little functionality to any car even if it's geared towards performance. I don't get the ridiculous looking "smile" in the front air dam. I'm done buying FWD or RWD cars anyway after owning 4 Subaru's with AWD. With symmetrical AWD there is no torque steer at all. Like I say FWD is for tricycle LOL!
@select20 Are you a good shopper? Your price range is too open, doesn't look like you narrowed it down enough. I would go for the 2011 WRX. Check out RoadFly's video if you haven't.
@ILikeReallyBigButts Yeah, I just need to go test driving. I just got rid of my 2006 Evo IX. I love driving the car if I was just out to drive hard. However i hated it for a Daily driver. I'm looking for something that will be fun to take out for autocross, but also not mind driving for every day.
Yeah, my price range is pretty wide because I the max I'm wanting to spend is about 35k. But I've always had a soft spot for hot-hatches.
ross i know this is is way late but i was wondering if the nissan juke you test drove was good in snow with the stock tires, i know its late but winter is coming sooner than expected and i need to know my mom has a juke and i need to know if she will be okay come snow. greetings from northern va fairfax
@EVILGOKU1986 I tested the Juke in a snowstorm and it was awesome! No worries. Hope this isn't too late...obviously we didn't get much snow this year.
You forgot one of the quirks being the big stupid black smiley face that ruins this car,even aftermarket bumpers can fix that problem, oh...thats right m there is no aftermarket for this car
@brihamlin1 Tech Package is basically what used to be included with the last gen's GT trim, plus some additional items. Self-leveling HIDs, adaptive headlamps, headlight trim LEDs, auto on/off headlights, blind spot monitor, rain sensing wipers, LED tails, satellite radio, navigation, push button start and alarm.
i dont understand how these turbo 4's get the same mpg as something like the v8 in the mustang or camaro. those cars cost the same as this and are faster, and i know they only have two doors but its a much more powerful v8 vs a 4 banger.
the mazdaspeed3 would be much better as a rwd car.
an awd car would be more expensive, heavier, and slower. the ms3 and ms6 were built in equal numbers in the US, dealers had a hard time keeping the ms3 in stock -- ms3 flew off the lots. the ms6 grew roots into the pavement. the ms6 only sold when dealers blew them out at firesale prices.
The old Mazda 3 was much better looking. Imho that car is giving the RX-8 a run for its money on the scale of over styled. Not particularly original sentiment, but they need to pick a styling direction and go with it (and ditch the grinning face while they are at it). The whole car, interior and exterior, is a bit fussy. Common Mazda lets simplify things a bit.
Nice review, but please stop with the crappy music in the background. I'd rather have just talking than having the crappy music you guys have been including in your videos lately. They make me embarrassed to watch your videos without any headphones.
I like the newness and the overall package but... The old 02 WRX hatch gets better mileage while being modified suspension and engine wise. I cant hate on its rattles and basic interior. Its payed for and this new mousy looking thing is far from burning a hole in my trade in pocket.
@orochimaruisugly not if someone wants a weekend warrior at the track!
I agree that the styling is better on the Golf, but it depends on where you live for the insurance, a 5-door hatch is usually cheaper than a hatch coupé (3-door). But I still wouldn't buy any of these 2 because they're FailWheelDrive ! I'd rather have an AWD Ralliart or a WRX (manual of course). FWD is just wrong for a sports car
i have the 2010 MS3 (nothing has changed for 2011 model) and i still love it! all i have is a full intake and a rear motor mount (RMM). I wanted more mods but i am actually happy with what i have now ;) great car.
On a side note, If you are getting this car or have it i recommend the rear motor mount. It greatly reduces torque steer and wheel hop. Plus puts more power to the ground! The best part is it takes only 5 minutes to install!
I really dont like it when they limit toque in lower gears. If they cant handle low down torque put the traction control on. As for torque its really not a big issue unless you cant hold a steering wheel properly
@ffdaasssd No they aren't. He said this thing tops out at 27K, That is 27,000 USD which come to about 19,000 Euro.... How are they almost the same price? Anyway everywhere is more expensive than the US.
Dont get me wrong i also like this car but when he said this car has insane power i thought he gonna say 400hp or 500hp. Now days having 264hp under your hood is common.
@ron20102002 Not in a compact. Most mid and compact cars barely have 200 these days, the only ones that do are ones with a V6 option in the midsize segments. 400-500 Hp is not suitable for such a car and would make it undriveable for the average person, not to mention the engine would not last very long if they kept it an I4.
Ross' definition of torque steer is incomplete. Unless that is what he really thinks defines it. You forgot to add the 'unequal length half shafts' as a variable w/ lots of power, that also induces this quirk.
Sad when Mazda is king, Honda and TOyota used to go neck and neck but they have fallen off so bad. I guess we can look forward to all the good Hyundais comming out though. Just not a fan of a wagon at all.
18/25 mpg is not good fuel econ considering that this is a compact hatch with a turbo direct injected engine. Some full size luxury cars with V8s without DI will damn near do that..and I think one or two actually do.
@DocWolph No kidding, right? The MS3 is a HIGHLY appealing car, and AWD with a torque vectoring rear differential would be an outstanding addition to the car. The flip side, of course is:
AWD => more weight => more power for same acceleration => need more boost and/or larger motor => more fuel used => less range on current tank OR larger tank and/or fuel saving tech => if larger tank and/or larger tank => or weight... and so on.
Still seeing what a good AWD for that car can do would be sweet!
@DocWolph I would like to see AWD on the MS3. In fact, I would prefer it if Mazda tries a rear biased AWD system on the MS3 with some form of torque vectoring. That said, I just wanted to point out to people that the introduction of AWD into the MS3 could potentially introduce a lot of weight into the car. I also wanted to highly some of the cascading effects of an AWD system.
I suppose if Mazda does an AWD MS3, then the world finally gets a hatchback EVO X, HAHA!
@WRXXXual Adding parts always adds weight. No argument. But it is for a reason. The weight added is useful. Most AWD systems add about 150-200lbs to a car. But it is for a reason. Because AWD in real cars (RC is quite surprising) is usually kludged and needlessly complicated, it is never as fast as 2WD, in a straight line with the same power. But control, grip, and maneuverability are always the big pluses.
@DocWolph because then it would make it at least 3 grand more expensive which would put in competition to the WRX impreza which is an exponentially better car
@Alex19al I would argue that. The EVO X has proven to the vastly better car than the WRX in every regard, and of course you get what you pay for. But if you can get a car at least as good as the WRX for as much or less, then why not?
So what you are saying is, "don't try you'll endanger the car I love". I am I wrong?
@DocWolph oh don't get me wrong i agree in that the evo X is light years better than the wrx. And the reason why I think Mazda doesn't make the MS3 have AWD is because it would jack up the price of the MS3 and defeat the idea of the car, (which is cheap speed), and I think it would also put the car in a higher insurance group. Not to mention the subie fans won't drive anything different, and the evo fans won't touch it because of the limited aftermarket.
@ms3bani - The MS6 was always intended to be a limited-production car. Mazda sold exactly as many of the as they intended to sell. The reason there is no current-gen MS6 is because Mazda uses two different platform sizes for the Mazda6: one for North America and one for the rest of the world. So they'd have to duplicate a lot of development costs to bring it to market making it impossible for them to do so cost-effectively.
@DroverChicago I think the MS6 used a different front and rear mounting system not a new platform, to accommodate the AWD system. It would have cost far too much to build an entire new platform for a limited run car they were only going to sell for a year.
@DocWolph - Because it adds weight and cost, and 90% of the MS3's target market will be content with FWD. I have both a Mazda6 (V6, manual) and an MS6, and while the MS6 is obviously a much quicker car, the regular 6 is more nimble, more responsive, and provides a more direct connection between the driver and the road. The MS6 makes a better winter car and stoplight warrior, but other than that the regular 6 is more fun to drive without the extra weight and ponderous AWD system.
@DroverChicago Hence they need to work on it more. To just "do it" is romantic, but as long as the MS3 works fine as is, getting an AWD package or version right would be sufficient for now.
@RochesterGT - first of all, try reading for context -- I was comparing an MS6 to a Mazda6 V6 as a way of explaining why the MS3 won't necessarily be a better car with an AWD driveline. Second, if "every match up you've ever seen has the MS3 winning" you haven't watched many. of them. In the hands of a very skilled driver, the MS3 is a dead heat for an MS6. In the hands of average drivers, the MS6 will take an MS3 80% of the time.
@dickcheese663 He's not that tall. The MS3 is about 57.5in/4ft9.5in tall.
The belt line is fine. Buyers and fans honestly think "bubble tops" looks goofy now-a-days. So, a balanced look that has no perfromance aura, or higher belt line that exudes it. Then there are the safety regs to consider.
Besides it looks cool and those, who actually buy new cars, are comparing. "Chop-top", perennially cool, within limits.
I have a 2010 Speed 3 and it's a killer car. The only thing I disagree with during this review s the statement about the aftermarket community being small. Corksport alone makes a shitload of parts for this car, performance parts.
AgileMJOLNIR 1 week ago
@AgileMJOLNIR—you raise some good points. However, the tire size still sucks! It's hard to find tires in that size and they are very expensive. Also the MS3 roasts tires and brakes in a big way. —Ross Rapoport
TypeR1013 1 week ago
droid eris... i hope you have something else now... that phone drove me nuts for a year and half
champ1193 1 week ago
@champ1193—it's actually not an Eris. It was an HTC Hero.
I now have a Samsung Galaxy S2, which doesn't fit in any compartments, lol.
TypeR1013 1 week ago
Nice car
TheGenovski 3 weeks ago
Anyone out there who owns one of these, can you tell me how the long distance comfort is? I know it's more of a sports car and comfort isn't exactly it's forte, but I'm considering this car as my first car after I come out of Tech School. I'll be driving in snow and may find myself in mountainous areas as well. How easy is this car to pick up and become accustomed to its clutch and shifting? I'm not as experienced with driving a manual car yet, but I'm learning (less than a year driving manual)
Arphalia 1 month ago
@Arphalia I've driven this car across country 3 times now, fully packed to the brim with all my stuff....it is great on comfort, never had any issues I can think of. Great seats, alot of storage/hauling capacity, and still quick/nimble. Had it 3 years now and still running like new!
DrumminJ219 1 month ago
The turbocharged engine is not so handy in cities where cops are at every corner catching your speed :(
davidjgmail 1 month ago
@davidjgmail I have the 9500ci installed, has gotten me out of WAY too many tickets to count, not a single ticket in 3 years yet and I zoom zoom all the time.
DrumminJ219 1 month ago
I got 30 HWY and about 23 city, just upgrade the intake.
jerimierothwell 3 months ago
Civics are crap compared to speed3s. How dare you compare. Civics are for broke high school kids that don't know anything hahaha
JangoM1 3 months ago 2
@JangoM1 haha sooo muthaf**king true, can't stand those fan boys, i mean i have respect if you car is at Least an SI model but a standard POS CIVIC? -_-....
TVinmyEye 1 month ago
@shawnspeed3
You bought a Mazda 3 and you don't like it??? Were you forced to buy it or are you really stupid?
JangoM1 3 months ago
why do you care if it's peaky. it makes way more power then a civic at half the rpms. the power is more useful and it's faster. how can someone be disappointed to have to stay in the powerband at 3000-5500. 9000 rpms is for ricers.
thedenimvault 3 months ago
get outta the rain and go to LA Auto Show, give us some reviews there
SweetHubby82 3 months ago
Good review. I would buy one if I didn't worry me to have a car with much less performance, refinement and ease of driving as soon the road became wet. IMHO, The gap between it's dry and wet abilities is its only downfall.
lauriejamesmackeson 3 months ago
Does anyone know if you still have to saw off the gas and brake pedals and weld them back at a comfortable angle on Mazdas? We stopped buying them in 1995 due to this issue.
avlisk 4 months ago
I have a '08 Speed3...and Mazda made a mess of everything! Front end is ridiculous, ugly wheels, cheesy interior materials/colors that just says "cheep".
shawnspeed3 4 months ago
Its too bad its a mazda, Honda and toyota really need to learn from this. We want the power, just not the ugly car and cheap car company. if it was a Honda it would sell much much more. Then again, they fell off and mazda still has the balls to make this kinda car.
Acc0rd79 4 months ago
@Acc0rd79 you're the proof people buy looks&badges and not cars
I agree the front end of the car isn't attractive, but in black or white I think the car is looking good as a whole!
Mazda has made a great job making this great car, but made a poor job on the styling (for the front bumper)
razioth 4 months ago
@razioth and there ya go, im not into 5 doors either. I want sports cars. Mazda has never been known for good quality cars either or with great resale. Hyundai is going through the roof on both areas and so im going to be looking at them for future cars as Honda/Toyota doesnt make shit anymore. Mazda is basically ford and well...yah ford.
Acc0rd79 4 months ago
@Acc0rd79 Wait Honda and Toyota are coming back they will surprise you the Si is going to be resigned all over again for 2013/2014 model year. This why Toyota has Scion to make that happen and they are doing it. They are just getting started after the Tsunamis they had to continue production of current vehicles. New things are brewing. Not giving up on these to brands. Mazda is still a so so car company all their cars look the same. Mazda Speed 6 is gone so why now put the AWD in the Speed 3 ?
soyntgo4it 4 months ago
@soyntgo4it The Si is a sad shell of a car, far from what it used to be.
PantstofryPWNZ 3 months ago in playlist More videos from roadflytv
@PantstofryPWNZ I agree the 9th generation wasn't what everyone expected. From what I read and heard 2013/2014 a new one is in development now. So I guess we have to wait again to see what happens. I was hoping they would have at least put the 2.3L Turbo that the RDX uses then at least it would have a place in small sport segment again.
soyntgo4it 3 months ago
Is there limited slip differential?
vitaliy2008g 4 months ago
thanks charlie@roadflytv i just hope we dont get stuck on the parkway again in snow storm . and just to let you know youre road fly review helped us in making the decision to buy the juke we didnt know how fun the car was to drive.
EVILGOKU1986 4 months ago in playlist More videos from roadflytv
i can only imagine since he looks that small in MS3, do CX-9, we will have an invisible reviewer
kalargyi 4 months ago
I have to agree with you Ross I too like the nice touches like storage spaces and cup holders in sporty cars.....there is nothing wrong with adding a little functionality to any car even if it's geared towards performance. I don't get the ridiculous looking "smile" in the front air dam. I'm done buying FWD or RWD cars anyway after owning 4 Subaru's with AWD. With symmetrical AWD there is no torque steer at all. Like I say FWD is for tricycle LOL!
porsche558 4 months ago
Wrx or Speed3?
bartmatton 4 months ago
ugh, why the smiling car?
sordow 4 months ago
get a speed3 i love mine.
Zornus 4 months ago
I'm in the market for a new car. Looking between a new Speed3, GTI and STI. Thanks for the reviews on each of these cars, really helps.
select20 4 months ago
@select20 Are you a good shopper? Your price range is too open, doesn't look like you narrowed it down enough. I would go for the 2011 WRX. Check out RoadFly's video if you haven't.
ILikeReallyBigButts 4 months ago
@ILikeReallyBigButts Yeah, I just need to go test driving. I just got rid of my 2006 Evo IX. I love driving the car if I was just out to drive hard. However i hated it for a Daily driver. I'm looking for something that will be fun to take out for autocross, but also not mind driving for every day.
Yeah, my price range is pretty wide because I the max I'm wanting to spend is about 35k. But I've always had a soft spot for hot-hatches.
select20 4 months ago
ross i know this is is way late but i was wondering if the nissan juke you test drove was good in snow with the stock tires, i know its late but winter is coming sooner than expected and i need to know my mom has a juke and i need to know if she will be okay come snow. greetings from northern va fairfax
EVILGOKU1986 4 months ago
@EVILGOKU1986 The street tires on the Juke are fine. It would be a waste of money to have a second set of snows for the Juke in the DC area.
-Charlie@RoadflyTV
roadflytv 4 months ago
@EVILGOKU1986 I tested the Juke in a snowstorm and it was awesome! No worries. Hope this isn't too late...obviously we didn't get much snow this year.
TypeR1013 2 weeks ago
holy shit, i knew he was small, but he looks smaller than usual in this.
ohiost8freak 4 months ago
Pretty fast car with acceleration like that.
netman88 4 months ago
Thank u Ross u really knows how to do ur job ... I always like yr car reviews
maaaaccckkk11111 4 months ago
it sooo sad that in canada, it starts at 30k, before delivery and 13% tax...WTF
mooda4208 4 months ago
Awkward moment 3:44
aendzo 4 months ago
yay Ross!
rdwhite83 4 months ago
Pretty good speed but how is it that the ford mustang boss is twice as fast and they both have about the same fuel economy
smp336 4 months ago
Too bad Ford and Mazda are having issues. I'd like to see the Focus with this power plant.
swinglow33 4 months ago
27K for base!
Up here in Canada they want 33K. For that price a person can get a 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 And still have money left over to Insure the Stang.
GerryK61 4 months ago
Still loving my Mazdaspeed6... All four wheels driven = no torque steer!
blacksinrealm 4 months ago
Why did Mazda limited power out?
imaginaiton4me 4 months ago
@imaginaiton4me To limit the effects of torque steer. As you can see by the video, they didn't quite achieve their goal.
WRXXXual 4 months ago
You forgot one of the quirks being the big stupid black smiley face that ruins this car,even aftermarket bumpers can fix that problem, oh...thats right m there is no aftermarket for this car
sentrakidsr20 4 months ago
The Mazda Torque Steer.
phantomloita 4 months ago
What do you mean by "limited aftermarket" as a downside? Also, what is included in the "Tech package"?
good video, nice car!
brihamlin1 4 months ago
@brihamlin1 Tech Package is basically what used to be included with the last gen's GT trim, plus some additional items. Self-leveling HIDs, adaptive headlamps, headlight trim LEDs, auto on/off headlights, blind spot monitor, rain sensing wipers, LED tails, satellite radio, navigation, push button start and alarm.
builthatch 4 months ago
@builthatch got it, thanks for the info.
brihamlin1 4 months ago
Kind of a badass little car.
venom5809 4 months ago
gas mileage same as ford crown vic or linclon town car
GMCvancouver 4 months ago
Why they don't put that engine in the Mazda MX5 really baffles the heck out of me!!!
OneOfaKind949 4 months ago
263hp and 280foot pound of torque is no joke
i had a car with same hp but less torque with a weight of 1650kg and it was seriously fast....
Verification11 4 months ago
Mazda!!! Keeping the stick-shift alive!!!! :)
peelout40 4 months ago 14
@peelout40 and i love them for that!
datpimpinboy 4 months ago
i dont understand how these turbo 4's get the same mpg as something like the v8 in the mustang or camaro. those cars cost the same as this and are faster, and i know they only have two doors but its a much more powerful v8 vs a 4 banger.
whiteandnerdytuba 4 months ago
the mazdaspeed3 would be much better as a rwd car.
an awd car would be more expensive, heavier, and slower. the ms3 and ms6 were built in equal numbers in the US, dealers had a hard time keeping the ms3 in stock -- ms3 flew off the lots. the ms6 grew roots into the pavement. the ms6 only sold when dealers blew them out at firesale prices.
mazda learned their lesson, so no awd ms3.
ms3bani 4 months ago
this will be a perfect first car
ProJcool 4 months ago
The old Mazda 3 was much better looking. Imho that car is giving the RX-8 a run for its money on the scale of over styled. Not particularly original sentiment, but they need to pick a styling direction and go with it (and ditch the grinning face while they are at it). The whole car, interior and exterior, is a bit fussy. Common Mazda lets simplify things a bit.
alphaswimmer55 4 months ago
Quit the background music, it's distracting.
dinonoce 4 months ago
I'll wait for the Focus ST. That front end of the 3 is too ugly!
brikag 4 months ago 21
@brikag Oh yeah.........That Focus ST is gonna be badass! And looks hot as hell!
robertjdm 4 months ago
@brikag ... the king
rickyguti 4 months ago
@brikag Focus is uglier.
rforracing 4 months ago
@brikag I know, I just can't get over that stupid smiling face, I just want to punch it. Other than that, its a great car.
chigasaki06 4 months ago
@brikag Thats what i said, but when i looked at it in person, it grew on me. My brother owns a 2012 speed3 and i love it.
xlaostha704x 2 months ago
@brikag You serious????
MyRandomLife247 2 months ago in playlist More videos from roadflytv
@MyRandomLife247 Hell ya!!!! Probs?????
brikag 2 months ago
Nice review, but please stop with the crappy music in the background. I'd rather have just talking than having the crappy music you guys have been including in your videos lately. They make me embarrassed to watch your videos without any headphones.
urafudgehead 4 months ago
who shut the hatch?
conceptcs 4 months ago
It would be a good car if there wasn't already the WRX.
ChipotleAlpaca 4 months ago
looks like a fish :3
KarlowBOI 4 months ago
love your channel guys keep up the good work !!
spartandy 4 months ago
for the same money ill take a base GTI and chip it so that it makes around 270hp w/o the torque steer and spray paint look seats
AlternativeUses 4 months ago
I like the newness and the overall package but... The old 02 WRX hatch gets better mileage while being modified suspension and engine wise. I cant hate on its rattles and basic interior. Its payed for and this new mousy looking thing is far from burning a hole in my trade in pocket.
cold02rex 4 months ago
GTI interior destroys this car's interior.
orochimaruisugly 4 months ago
@orochimaruisugly No kidding. The GTI's interior is...perfect!
acurazdx4 4 months ago
@orochimaruisugly Agreed, but mazda is better everywhere else performance-wise
razioth 4 months ago
@razioth You would be a fool to buy this car over the GTI.
The GTI is more reliable, less expensive on insurance, better mileage, better interior, better exteior, etc etc etc.
orochimaruisugly 4 months ago
@orochimaruisugly not if someone wants a weekend warrior at the track!
I agree that the styling is better on the Golf, but it depends on where you live for the insurance, a 5-door hatch is usually cheaper than a hatch coupé (3-door). But I still wouldn't buy any of these 2 because they're FailWheelDrive ! I'd rather have an AWD Ralliart or a WRX (manual of course). FWD is just wrong for a sports car
razioth 4 months ago
@orochimaruisugly Everything you said is true but don't forget maintenance fees for VW are waaaay more expensive compared to Mazda!
iTzMattz 4 months ago
@iTzMattz Cause volkswagen has better parts!
orochimaruisugly 4 months ago
ohhhhhhhhh shit :D
thugangel662 4 months ago
i have the 2010 MS3 (nothing has changed for 2011 model) and i still love it! all i have is a full intake and a rear motor mount (RMM). I wanted more mods but i am actually happy with what i have now ;) great car.
On a side note, If you are getting this car or have it i recommend the rear motor mount. It greatly reduces torque steer and wheel hop. Plus puts more power to the ground! The best part is it takes only 5 minutes to install!
ooharloo 4 months ago
I really dont like it when they limit toque in lower gears. If they cant handle low down torque put the traction control on. As for torque its really not a big issue unless you cant hold a steering wheel properly
TheVtieg6 4 months ago
that was a good review
Betaops252 4 months ago
nice
iliasky 4 months ago
Love it. The impreza too.
flammnkta 4 months ago
The only Mazda vehicle I would consider buying.
Logicsupremacy 4 months ago
New ones are ugly AF! They smile at everything.
mazda6tuner99 4 months ago
You got on it. Note, didn't notice.
ShermanMR2 4 months ago
if only it was AWD and had better brakes
bmwrocks325 4 months ago
the power of the car is great, the only thing that would stop me from getting this car is the look of the interior and exterior
isev94 4 months ago
Very nice 3. It looks sweet and sounds pretty quiet for a performance car too. Love the sound of the engine.
giannial1985 4 months ago
This car , in my country has ~33.000 euro , that is about 40.000 uds ... :(
Great car
ffdaasssd 4 months ago
@ffdaasssd US is still one of the cheapest places in the world to buy a car.
flatblackstrat 4 months ago
@flatblackstrat yes but , it is allmost have the price .. :P :D
ffdaasssd 4 months ago
@ffdaasssd No they aren't. He said this thing tops out at 27K, That is 27,000 USD which come to about 19,000 Euro.... How are they almost the same price? Anyway everywhere is more expensive than the US.
flatblackstrat 4 months ago
@flatblackstrat on my previous port * half price :D
and in greece , this car on the high taxe rate ( 2.3 cc ... )
ffdaasssd 4 months ago
Dont get me wrong i also like this car but when he said this car has insane power i thought he gonna say 400hp or 500hp. Now days having 264hp under your hood is common.
ron20102002 4 months ago
@ron20102002 Not in a compact. Most mid and compact cars barely have 200 these days, the only ones that do are ones with a V6 option in the midsize segments. 400-500 Hp is not suitable for such a car and would make it undriveable for the average person, not to mention the engine would not last very long if they kept it an I4.
flatblackstrat 4 months ago
Comment removed
ron20102002 4 months ago
MS3 is a nice car, but I'd be hard pressed to take this when a WRX is in the same price range.
Sadfhorde 4 months ago
Finally a car that's shorter than ross.
nforspeed91 4 months ago
Ross' definition of torque steer is incomplete. Unless that is what he really thinks defines it. You forgot to add the 'unequal length half shafts' as a variable w/ lots of power, that also induces this quirk.
bajabusta 4 months ago
Looks like an insect from the front.
upiluften 4 months ago
@upiluften to me it looks like a whale smiling at you
hopkinspro 4 months ago
Sad when Mazda is king, Honda and TOyota used to go neck and neck but they have fallen off so bad. I guess we can look forward to all the good Hyundais comming out though. Just not a fan of a wagon at all.
Niche79 4 months ago
Like the video and car, but the reviewer was kind of boring. Anyway decent job.
313hotboi 4 months ago
18/25 mpg is not good fuel econ considering that this is a compact hatch with a turbo direct injected engine. Some full size luxury cars with V8s without DI will damn near do that..and I think one or two actually do.
2003SCT 4 months ago
I'm happy with my 2012 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 R-Spec for 25k.
mehsdomi 4 months ago
i want
stinky242 4 months ago
Ahh yeah finally got a review on my favorite car.
raspad67 4 months ago
veloster anytime soon?
walkthepark 4 months ago
Too bad you can't get a sunroof on the MS3.
bottomlayer 4 months ago
zoom zoom zoooom !
soroboro8 4 months ago
MAZDA needs to work on a AWD MS3 at least as an option. They did it for the MS6, so why the deuce not?
DocWolph 4 months ago 23
@DocWolph No kidding, right? The MS3 is a HIGHLY appealing car, and AWD with a torque vectoring rear differential would be an outstanding addition to the car. The flip side, of course is:
AWD => more weight => more power for same acceleration => need more boost and/or larger motor => more fuel used => less range on current tank OR larger tank and/or fuel saving tech => if larger tank and/or larger tank => or weight... and so on.
Still seeing what a good AWD for that car can do would be sweet!
WRXXXual 4 months ago
@WRXXXual Are you trying to argue against and AWD option or not?
DocWolph 4 months ago
@DocWolph I would like to see AWD on the MS3. In fact, I would prefer it if Mazda tries a rear biased AWD system on the MS3 with some form of torque vectoring. That said, I just wanted to point out to people that the introduction of AWD into the MS3 could potentially introduce a lot of weight into the car. I also wanted to highly some of the cascading effects of an AWD system.
I suppose if Mazda does an AWD MS3, then the world finally gets a hatchback EVO X, HAHA!
WRXXXual 4 months ago
@WRXXXual Adding parts always adds weight. No argument. But it is for a reason. The weight added is useful. Most AWD systems add about 150-200lbs to a car. But it is for a reason. Because AWD in real cars (RC is quite surprising) is usually kludged and needlessly complicated, it is never as fast as 2WD, in a straight line with the same power. But control, grip, and maneuverability are always the big pluses.
I get what you are saying. I think we agree.
DocWolph 4 months ago
@DocWolph because then it would make it at least 3 grand more expensive which would put in competition to the WRX impreza which is an exponentially better car
Alex19al 4 months ago
@Alex19al I would argue that. The EVO X has proven to the vastly better car than the WRX in every regard, and of course you get what you pay for. But if you can get a car at least as good as the WRX for as much or less, then why not?
So what you are saying is, "don't try you'll endanger the car I love". I am I wrong?
DocWolph 4 months ago
@DocWolph oh don't get me wrong i agree in that the evo X is light years better than the wrx. And the reason why I think Mazda doesn't make the MS3 have AWD is because it would jack up the price of the MS3 and defeat the idea of the car, (which is cheap speed), and I think it would also put the car in a higher insurance group. Not to mention the subie fans won't drive anything different, and the evo fans won't touch it because of the limited aftermarket.
Alex19al 4 months ago
@DocWolph why have AWD? only so u dont have to deal with the shame of having a fwd?
geppegep 4 months ago
@geppegep Because you want one or need one.
DocWolph 4 months ago
@DocWolph ya!
kozes 4 months ago
Comment removed
ms3bani 4 months ago
@DocWolph
look at how well the ms6 did, a complete smashing sales success was it not?
no sir no, awd. it would make the ms3 slower and price it out of the segment.
if anything rwd would be a far, far better idea.
ms3bani 4 months ago
@ms3bani - The MS6 was always intended to be a limited-production car. Mazda sold exactly as many of the as they intended to sell. The reason there is no current-gen MS6 is because Mazda uses two different platform sizes for the Mazda6: one for North America and one for the rest of the world. So they'd have to duplicate a lot of development costs to bring it to market making it impossible for them to do so cost-effectively.
DroverChicago 4 months ago
@DroverChicago I think the MS6 used a different front and rear mounting system not a new platform, to accommodate the AWD system. It would have cost far too much to build an entire new platform for a limited run car they were only going to sell for a year.
DocWolph 4 months ago
@DocWolph - Because it adds weight and cost, and 90% of the MS3's target market will be content with FWD. I have both a Mazda6 (V6, manual) and an MS6, and while the MS6 is obviously a much quicker car, the regular 6 is more nimble, more responsive, and provides a more direct connection between the driver and the road. The MS6 makes a better winter car and stoplight warrior, but other than that the regular 6 is more fun to drive without the extra weight and ponderous AWD system.
DroverChicago 4 months ago 3
@DroverChicago Hence they need to work on it more. To just "do it" is romantic, but as long as the MS3 works fine as is, getting an AWD package or version right would be sufficient for now.
DocWolph 4 months ago
@DroverChicago The MS6 is not "a much quicker car." Every match up I've ever seen has the MS3 winning.
RochesterGT 4 months ago
@RochesterGT - first of all, try reading for context -- I was comparing an MS6 to a Mazda6 V6 as a way of explaining why the MS3 won't necessarily be a better car with an AWD driveline. Second, if "every match up you've ever seen has the MS3 winning" you haven't watched many. of them. In the hands of a very skilled driver, the MS3 is a dead heat for an MS6. In the hands of average drivers, the MS6 will take an MS3 80% of the time.
DroverChicago 4 months ago
STI is the better car;)
BloodyHawk39 4 months ago
GTI is better car.
blackseries99 4 months ago
I rather buy a GTI.
davesecx 4 months ago
the car is like =D
bestguy656 4 months ago
The smiley face front grill should be an option! ;-)
Other than that it seems like a lot of car for the money.
groove420 4 months ago
ice review
Underxman 4 months ago
also....the belt line on this car is mega high, just look, is at his neck level, or he isn't tall....who knows
dickcheese663 4 months ago
@dickcheese663 He's not that tall. The MS3 is about 57.5in/4ft9.5in tall.
The belt line is fine. Buyers and fans honestly think "bubble tops" looks goofy now-a-days. So, a balanced look that has no perfromance aura, or higher belt line that exudes it. Then there are the safety regs to consider.
Besides it looks cool and those, who actually buy new cars, are comparing. "Chop-top", perennially cool, within limits.
DocWolph 4 months ago
Will you guys be looking at the VW Golf R?
desurgeon 4 months ago 29
@desurgeon or scirocco:D
catalin357 4 months ago
@desurgeon
More like seat leon cupra r which has the golf r but is cheaper and fwd
TheVtieg6 4 months ago
@desurgeon Really want this review.
dotZodiac 4 months ago
Torque Steer 2:37
QAdeputy 4 months ago
lots of power for a small car.
Nice.
hahaha10001 4 months ago
looks good, but just like a Volvo S60 T5 FWD.......torque steer kings!
dickcheese663 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is my first first comment on a video ever!!!
redsoxfan5240 4 months ago
@redsoxfan5240 congratulations on your first thumbs down, and flag as spam than
DoomTra1n 4 months ago
@DoomTra1n I doubt it's the first thumbs down, but I appreciate how highly you think of me.
redsoxfan5240 4 months ago