Ugh, I watched this film shortly after I finished the game Stalker: Shadow of Chernobyl, so anyone who has played that knows how disappointed I was while watching this film, I had to fast forward some parts since they were so slooooowww!
Best Tarkovsky film to me will always be Solaris, though I still haven't seen Mirrors.
Tarkovsky's films were truly staggering works. The release of a Tarkovsky fillm was a major event. Each one is filled with great depths of thought and spirituality. I know of no other filmmaker more obsessed with stirring moods within us through imagery.
funny how Americans are obsessing over the least interesting part of the video, a sub machine gun. Never mind the brilliant use of reflections and water, just focus on the guns, people. It doesn't freaking matter that is was a tommy gun, he probably used whatever was handy. If he had cared, he probably would have used a PPSh, better than a tommy gun anyway. Way better.
Look at the Wikipedia encyclopaedia link on Stalker, the production notes..
The Vladimir Sharun quote near the bottom regarding the area it was shot, circumstances and deaths of Tarkovsky and his Wife in connection with this film.
It's amazing how good the film looks from the quality of the film itself. It doesn't look like it was from 1979, but perhaps the 90s. Where the Soviets making as high quality film equipment as the West was or did they get theirs imported in?
@mobius1aic Maybe, maybe not. I watched the whole film on Google Video (it's still available) and it looks the same. It must have something to do with the film itself. Listen to the music, that to, also sounds incredible Analog and warm. If you're interested, I've done a cover of the main theme "Meditation"; it's on my channel.
@VitasWishList Yah, I'm pretty sure that the game was first. The game came out in 2006 or something, this video is 2 years old. Come on, that's basic math. Don't be dum.
You're so stupid its not even funny. You trollin' or somethin?
People told you - its a movie from the 70's. Both the movie and the game are loosely based on the novel "Picnic on the Sideroad" by Strugatsky brothers.
@TheSauronator haha, calm down dude. I was making a joke with my first comment, but then that guy took it seriously and got angry, so I decided to mess with him.
Since the filming was done in Estonia, I'm willing to bet Tarkovsky found that thompson there. Most Estonians joined the Finnish in World War 2, where they used some British and American made-weaponry.
The scene's purpose is to show that everything man-made will eventually be forgotten. In the end, medicine (needle), memories (picture), wealth (coins), war (thompson) and technology (spring) will all corrode eventually be swolled up by the earth.
@someoneigna In a book, wich this movie is based on, took place in a ficticious western country, so they showed western artifacts there. People in Soviet Union didn't drive around in Land Rovers eighter. This movie is not about Russia, it's about humanity. Tarkovsky was not a typical soviet film director.
moving and wonderfull.i think its about human folly and failiure.all the objects in the water testify to our bankruptcy as a species.all thats missing is a hole gushing out oil!
Oh, and this scene... This scene is one of the most haunting ones in any movie, period. I still remember it down to minute details, even though I saw the film 4 years ago. P.S. Yes, the firearm is possibly a rusty Tommy gun.
Though I was a bit disappointed that the movie deviated from the novel in several ways, I still think it expressed the key themes and the bizzare post-apocalytpic atmosphere spot on. In spirit, it has a dark and cynical tone quite similar to that of the Strugatskis. So yeah, I was pleased. :-)
I am downloading this movie right now. (IDK where else to get it so I have to torrent :/) This looks like a really good movie. Found about this from S.T.A.L.K.E.R. SoC. Every scene, every frame, feels like it could be a piece of art.
@fakenphoney Definitely a Thompson with a dry mag-well. You can tell by the cocking handle on the receiver, and its controls. It does kinda look like a pistol though. It took me a while to catch it. :p
@egdqv13234 actualy its a Thompson 1928 w/o the front pistol grip, and a short stick magazine, you can tell because the charging handle is on the top of the reciever
@fakenphoney No, that's definitely some variant of a Thompson submachine gun. Because of the extensive lend-lease act during WW2, the USSR had a lot of American weapons, so its probable that they were easy to come by and use for filming in the '70s when this was shot. Brilliant shot btw; one of my favorite scenes in one of my favorite films!
@fakenphoney you can kind of see at the corner of the box shape has more gun to show. it looks more like a rifle to me, but i don't know if it's a thompson for sure.
It's a Thompson M1A1. The pistol grip has grooves for the fingers, and you can see the foregrip, the safety / selector, and the distinctive cocking handle on top.
@The0ptimistic0ne could be from lend-lease equipment in ww2, the soviets fielded churchill tanks and american trucks as well. or who knows maybe it was a creative decision.
@Lucidius134 It's a Thompson. During WW2 as part of Lend Lease, American tanks were sent to the USSR came equipped with Thompson SMGs as part of the normal support gear for the tank crew. Well, problem is, the USSR didn't use .45 ACP, so the Thompson SMGs were utterly useless due to a lack of ammunition and wound up being packed away as direct surplus. I imagine the one used in this film was one of those Lend Lease SMGs.
greatest movie ever made!! this is pure art !!! this is art!!! i saw it 5 or 6 times,and i still want to watch it over and over again,because i always find out new things in this movie.
I can't even imagine how much work went into getting these shots so perfect, if you watch closely right at the end there, the camera was moving downwards, tilting upwards and zooming out all at the same time :P
i once watched a russian film it was kind of like stalker all i remember is these guys walking around a forest with a geiger counter and then they went down a hole. There was a girl who was sick and needed massages or something. I think her dad was looking for a cure for her. It was really eery film if anyone knows whats its called please let me know :)
I was going through the special features on the DVD and everyone is dead! I'm not kidding, actor for the Stalker died in very early 60's of heart attack, actor for Writter died at age 47 of cancer, actor for Prof. was in his late 70's anyway and director in his mid 50's. And all but two crew members are still alive. In fact a sound tech that is still working today is positive that they were poisened when they shot the area at the plant. O_o
Chernobyl was in 1986 this film is from 71 so there is no way this could be about the chenobyl-disaster. I know, there where thinks like that before ( e.g. the Kyshtym disaster in Majak in 1957 which was top secret until the end of the cold war).
I read a book from tarkovskji and he said, he don't wants to answer these questions, because this questions are intended to be like they are. He might had answers in mind - but it wouldn't be him if he would tell them. Think about them for yourself
This movie was made in 1973. It's not about the Chernobyl disaster. Tarkovsky made it as a symbolic film for a man who leads people to God. In this particular excerpt the book for Revelation in which your number in your name is from is recited from. John 3:16.
In case you felt offended, I meant none. I thought you might have found it interesting that the movie quoted from the same book the numbers were from is all. =] Have a happy new year.
You're saying, numbers are numbers - but what is "numbers". "numbers" is a word which has a certain meaning. A simple numer like 7 oder 5 is a symbol and symbols are connected with meanings (otherwise you wouldn't know what to do with that symbol). If you read a 100 on a street-sign you'll know "oh I shouldn't drive more than 100 here" if you read it on a banknote you think "woah thats enaugh money for..."
But what you're never thinking is: "its just a number"
@Gotteskrieger07 Its not a good idea to read too much into Tarkovsky's films. Ie 'this image is symbolic of this...' etc. He intended his films to just be appreciated for what they are. People find whatever they want in them. He said once he didn't know what the images in his films mean.
@Gotteskrieger07 its been widely documented that the religious references depict a preoccupation only. tarkovsky has always said that the symbolism is flat, the objects are to be understood as objects, things of materiality and texture which hold age. he has described any direct metaphorical abstraction as crude. for me the film documents the complexity of the human condition rather than the pursuit of the afterlife. the greatness of a film like this is of course the broad interpretation
@Gotteskrieger07 The is no symbolism in this film, there is no true interpration of this film, only opinions imformed by personal experience of the veiwer.
@Gotteskrieger07 the stalker doesnt lead people to god but to the zone where all desires will come true. its based on a short story (called roadside picnic) where an alien race comes from another planet and mysteriously set up a zone to fullfill all our desires. my reading of this revolves around the question of what if a highly evolved aliens visited the earth who were so advanced that in relation to us they vertually would be gods in our eyes.
I remember seeing the Stalker for the first time. This was my intorduction ot Tarkovsky, a revelation in the sacred sense. During a longtime I flet there were only three authors in cinema : him, Bergman, and Antonioni. Of course I was wrong !
Its really atmospheric to watch this part even on youtube... And still the most joy this film brings me in a dark,silent room where you are almost like in open space, and on my big screen there is this everliving masterpiece slowly moving frame after frame, sound by sound into the deep world of imagination where you create your only unique meaning of this film. This is what i call the joy of life, the joy of moment... Thank you Andrey Tarkovsky.
I always thought that this scene represented the "dirt" of humanity.A syringe,a gun,ambigous metallic shards,picture of a political figure etc.Tarkovsky is the the best director of all time though if i had to pick the best movie,i can't decide between Stalker or Zerkalo.
This is a brilliant film. It definately requires patience. It's worth watching it to the end. It may be slow, but thats part of what makes it work. I love the long lasting shots. They're so impressive.
@repe112 hollywood has some nice films too but those effects just cant make the films deeper and dont forget it hollywood has learnt much from tarkovsky and russian cinema, of course stalker is still beats any hollywood film with its atmosphere but I guess isnt just for anyone
yes it is an artistic film so if you have strong ADD and have seen to many hollywood B movies , you might not have the patience required to appreciate this masterpiece.
If you have to ask what the meaning is you're missing the point. Tarkovsky's whole theory of film is that you should create your own symbolic associations, not allow them to be prescribed
This has been flagged as spam show
I love to stay inside and smoke to this movie, one of the best movies ever
Kingdagmarius 4 months ago
Ugh, I watched this film shortly after I finished the game Stalker: Shadow of Chernobyl, so anyone who has played that knows how disappointed I was while watching this film, I had to fast forward some parts since they were so slooooowww!
Best Tarkovsky film to me will always be Solaris, though I still haven't seen Mirrors.
Lpedraja2002 4 months ago
This is my favorite scene in Stalker.
shiffty1032231 5 months ago
Well, well, well... 1:57 illegal coat of arms on money. Soviet censors must be blind.
DeMysteriisDomSathan 6 months ago
This makes me want to scuba dive.
DuskAndHerEmbrace13 6 months ago
there are not words for describe this film. absolutly perfect
pablofilms4 6 months ago
Quite an opposite, that movie requiers very clear head to understand it. And wisdom. Else it would be like watching Mona Lisa painting drunk.
Quex01 6 months ago
Brilliant brilliant movie.
Yseulte 7 months ago
Tarkovsky's films were truly staggering works. The release of a Tarkovsky fillm was a major event. Each one is filled with great depths of thought and spirituality. I know of no other filmmaker more obsessed with stirring moods within us through imagery.
scottmackeen 8 months ago 2
funny how Americans are obsessing over the least interesting part of the video, a sub machine gun. Never mind the brilliant use of reflections and water, just focus on the guns, people. It doesn't freaking matter that is was a tommy gun, he probably used whatever was handy. If he had cared, he probably would have used a PPSh, better than a tommy gun anyway. Way better.
kellnola 10 months ago
"The passage of time and inertia time"
ateniense7 10 months ago
Comment removed
ateniense7 10 months ago
Comment removed
PigPotProductions 10 months ago
4 people didn't make it through the meat grinder.
TheWyrmOuroboros 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a great movie...
Fawkes002 11 months ago
Hypnotic and fascinating, speaks volumes without words! Thank you fakenphoney
for posting and to opensecret51 for sharing!
Kievest 11 months ago
At 2:35, you can see a calendar that's been opened to December 28th. Strangely, that turned out to be the date of Tarkovsky's death. Weird.
PrimusInterInpares 11 months ago 39
@PrimusInterInpares yes, especially since this movie is most likely what caused his death, from cancer.
kellnola 10 months ago
@PrimusInterInpares
how do you know it is december?, i only see the 28
berserkersen 10 months ago
@PrimusInterInpares
And it was exposure to this heavily polluted water that led to his death seven years later.
Blyledge 9 months ago
@PrimusInterInpares Extremely creepy, and I'll tell you why.
Look at the Wikipedia encyclopaedia link on Stalker, the production notes..
The Vladimir Sharun quote near the bottom regarding the area it was shot, circumstances and deaths of Tarkovsky and his Wife in connection with this film.
corso513 8 months ago
@corso513 alguien me tiene que decir por es aterradora ¡¡¡he¡
subsigma 8 months ago
you do realise of course that this is the greatest scene ever made right?
kathisterimata 1 year ago
amazing movie ! ! !
Svargedorath 1 year ago
Comment removed
ateniense7 1 year ago
What a strange movie! It explores some major philosophical themes.
khashayar44 1 year ago
Oh my god this movie is beautiful
Nerevar1990 1 year ago 2
Funny that 1:59 there are some old Estonian coins from 1930s
Estonian coins and thompson in soviet movie?
pealik22 1 year ago
Comment removed
Saltsa1989 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pealik22 The movie was shot in Estonia so maybe that explains the coins :)
Saltsa1989 1 year ago
@pealik22 actually this scene was shot in Estonia near Tallin.
eziux 1 year ago
It's amazing how good the film looks from the quality of the film itself. It doesn't look like it was from 1979, but perhaps the 90s. Where the Soviets making as high quality film equipment as the West was or did they get theirs imported in?
mobius1aic 1 year ago
@mobius1aic Yes, and to think that much of the film's appearance is due to it being incorrectly processed!
neocoders 1 year ago
@mobius1aic Analog, my friend, Analog. It will always look "warmer".
TheSYNTHOID 1 year ago
@TheSYNTHOID Yeah but it looks "warmer" than western movies from that era. Maybe it's the lack of quality on youtube that keeps us from seeing that.
mobius1aic 1 year ago
@mobius1aic Maybe, maybe not. I watched the whole film on Google Video (it's still available) and it looks the same. It must have something to do with the film itself. Listen to the music, that to, also sounds incredible Analog and warm. If you're interested, I've done a cover of the main theme "Meditation"; it's on my channel.
TheSYNTHOID 1 year ago
I have a stalker. she's insane.
zeldakix2007 1 year ago
Stalker + joint = mystical experience.
NenziTre 1 year ago 32
@NenziTre
I think shrooms would be more interesting.
TheRussianGlory 11 months ago
@NenziTre
haha i was sure i wasn't the only one to think this is a good idea
i`m gonna watch it tonight stoned
also i fucking love this movie
Caomusca 10 months ago
Comment removed
PigPotProductions 10 months ago
Strugatsky brothers rewrote the script five times, and only about the latest version Tarkovsky said: this is what I wanted
olddino2005 1 year ago
Just amazing cut scene.. But I think you should had the dog scene too... That make the whole scene complete.
Aramastad 1 year ago
Dont just stand there, come in!
sk8rocksick1 1 year ago 2
So they made a movie out of that game, huh? Nah, the game is better. This is BOOOOORRRINNNNGGGGG.
ThwartedVillainy 1 year ago
@ThwartedVillainy Ignorant comment...
No, Tarkovsky made the movie based on short story. The game was made 25 years later.
After such unresearched statement (sign of you not caring about what you're saying), why would anyone care about your opinion?
VitasWishList 1 year ago
@VitasWishList Yah, I'm pretty sure that the game was first. The game came out in 2006 or something, this video is 2 years old. Come on, that's basic math. Don't be dum.
ThwartedVillainy 1 year ago
@ThwartedVillainy
You're so stupid its not even funny. You trollin' or somethin?
People told you - its a movie from the 70's. Both the movie and the game are loosely based on the novel "Picnic on the Sideroad" by Strugatsky brothers.
TheSauronator 1 year ago
@TheSauronator haha, calm down dude. I was making a joke with my first comment, but then that guy took it seriously and got angry, so I decided to mess with him.
ThwartedVillainy 1 year ago
@ThwartedVillainy
Well then sorry - my bad. I thought you were a fail troll =)
TheSauronator 1 year ago
you alloy with Broomhandle. it is a ww2 german pistol but in the, it is obviously thompson
hellmine 1 year ago
good hunting stalker XD
LKerRKwa 1 year ago
Dirty commie movie for the win.
Urdalibertine 1 year ago
OMG, he's Strelok!
89Obscure 1 year ago 2
Does 'Roadside Picknick' shed any light whatsoever on the meaning of this movie?
loribit85 1 year ago
definitely a thompson, you can see the handle, if it was a mouser it would just have the barrel.
ToggleJabaut 1 year ago
my favourite part of the movie.
almost 4 minutes of reflection about your life.
Szczotkov 1 year ago
@Szczotkov
I agree with you. The pure beauty of this sequence may come from its very slow rhythm that allow us to think, at last.
nitroglobus 1 year ago
I heard a lot people died during the filming becouse of the radiation
DJDAVIDXJOVAN 1 year ago
The video is corrupted for me. It stops at 0:15.
Darkinsigniosis 1 year ago
Has Stalker been made available on Blu-Ray yet? Metropolis has one now, so why not?
Darkinsigniosis 1 year ago
Does anybody know the music?
seekthedragonout 1 year ago
@seekthedragonout
Eduard Nikolaevich Artemyev - composer for 3 of Tarkovsky movies.
ksushka 1 year ago
Thompson question and scene question answered:
Since the filming was done in Estonia, I'm willing to bet Tarkovsky found that thompson there. Most Estonians joined the Finnish in World War 2, where they used some British and American made-weaponry.
The scene's purpose is to show that everything man-made will eventually be forgotten. In the end, medicine (needle), memories (picture), wealth (coins), war (thompson) and technology (spring) will all corrode eventually be swolled up by the earth.
Penfish2k 1 year ago 3
I'm not religious, but here's the bible reference in the opening dialogue for the curious:
Revelations 6:12-17
I've got to admit, even tho I'm atheist--it's a pretty awesome passage lol
Penfish2k 1 year ago 2
Why is there a Thompson in a Russian lake? haha that was funny
someoneigna 1 year ago
@someoneigna In a book, wich this movie is based on, took place in a ficticious western country, so they showed western artifacts there. People in Soviet Union didn't drive around in Land Rovers eighter. This movie is not about Russia, it's about humanity. Tarkovsky was not a typical soviet film director.
Quex01 6 months ago
Why is there a Thompson in a Russian lake? haha that was funny oh is not a lake, is a flooded house, haha
someoneigna 1 year ago
best szene from best movie EVER! genius!
creamneuron 1 year ago
and it is not a thomson! it's mauser
amineurin 1 year ago
this sequence ...is outstanding! the best i ever saw! a true masterpiece!
amineurin 1 year ago
moving and wonderfull.i think its about human folly and failiure.all the objects in the water testify to our bankruptcy as a species.all thats missing is a hole gushing out oil!
bradshawvincent 1 year ago
great post thank you. someone knows if the soundtrack was ever released
crismartinus 1 year ago
Interesting Video Mate!!!!!!!!!!
777TIZZable 1 year ago
what would an american gun be doing there...i mean how would it get there?.... if it was an mp40 i would get it but hmm....
fjuraa 1 year ago
the Chernobyl is used as symbol for the whole world, and the chamber is the symbol for the meaning of the entire life, God
LovecraftsNest 1 year ago
Oh, and this scene... This scene is one of the most haunting ones in any movie, period. I still remember it down to minute details, even though I saw the film 4 years ago. P.S. Yes, the firearm is possibly a rusty Tommy gun.
ZemplinTemplar 1 year ago 2
Though I was a bit disappointed that the movie deviated from the novel in several ways, I still think it expressed the key themes and the bizzare post-apocalytpic atmosphere spot on. In spirit, it has a dark and cynical tone quite similar to that of the Strugatskis. So yeah, I was pleased. :-)
ZemplinTemplar 1 year ago
I am downloading this movie right now. (IDK where else to get it so I have to torrent :/) This looks like a really good movie. Found about this from S.T.A.L.K.E.R. SoC. Every scene, every frame, feels like it could be a piece of art.
TearsOfWar1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Lucidius134 1 year ago 2
@Lucidius134 looks like a pistol, maybe a Mauser?
fakenphoney 1 year ago
@fakenphoney
It lacks the 'broomhandle'. And by that I mostly mean the handles don't look too simular.
Also you can see a foregrip.
Lucidius134 1 year ago
@fakenphoney Definitely a Thompson with a dry mag-well. You can tell by the cocking handle on the receiver, and its controls. It does kinda look like a pistol though. It took me a while to catch it. :p
Kos45 1 year ago
EDIT: been answered 100 times.. woops :p
Kos45 1 year ago
@fakenphoney definitely a thompson
ianispooponastick 1 year ago
@fakenphoney That's an American M1A2 Thompson
SMGJohn 1 year ago
@fakenphoney it is a thompson because it's bigger than a mauser
scarfaceforevr 1 year ago
@fakenphoney No, it IS a Thompson! The for of the grip and the safety switch tells everything. Just compare it to this image:
Kicsur 1 year ago
@fakenphoney @fakenphoney No, it IS a Thompson! The for of the grip and the safety switch tells everything. Just compare it to an image of a thompson!
Kicsur 1 year ago
@fakenphoney
Definitely a Thompson Model 1928 sub-machine gun.
hobofactory 1 year ago
@fakenphoney nop its a thompson sub machinegun a1 i think
egdqv13234 1 year ago
@egdqv13234 actualy its a Thompson 1928 w/o the front pistol grip, and a short stick magazine, you can tell because the charging handle is on the top of the reciever
Bl0odVomit 1 year ago
@Bl0odVomit yah gangster one from godfather...
egdqv13234 1 year ago
@fakenphoney No, that's definitely some variant of a Thompson submachine gun. Because of the extensive lend-lease act during WW2, the USSR had a lot of American weapons, so its probable that they were easy to come by and use for filming in the '70s when this was shot. Brilliant shot btw; one of my favorite scenes in one of my favorite films!
IneptTroopr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fakenphoney you alloy with Broomhandle. it is a ww2 german pistol but in the, it is obviously thompson
hellmine 1 year ago
@fakenphoney you can kind of see at the corner of the box shape has more gun to show. it looks more like a rifle to me, but i don't know if it's a thompson for sure.
ByardJones 1 year ago
@fakenphoney
It's a Thompson M1A1. The pistol grip has grooves for the fingers, and you can see the foregrip, the safety / selector, and the distinctive cocking handle on top.
Beautiful clip by the way.
Stoitist 1 year ago
@fakenphoney No. Thomspon for sure.
bobohobo1441 1 year ago
@fakenphoney That's a Thompson alright
jakobborg 1 year ago
Comment removed
ateniense7 1 year ago
@fakenphoney
nah i looked closer it is a thompson.
Starioshka 1 year ago
@fakenphoney Looks like a tommy to me, I always wondered why they had US weapons in the movie (I think they showed an m1911 later on as well).
The0ptimistic0ne 11 months ago
@The0ptimistic0ne could be from lend-lease equipment in ww2, the soviets fielded churchill tanks and american trucks as well. or who knows maybe it was a creative decision.
skumar8 10 months ago
@Lucidius134
it is a thompson..
you may wonder what is doing there until you see writer´s gun´s fate
Lievcocijo 1 year ago
@Lucidius134 It's a Thompson.
anz00n 1 year ago
@Lucidius134 Yeah, that's a Thompson
Isosyth 1 year ago
@Lucidius134 It is a Thompson.
TheSirSandro 1 year ago
@Lucidius134 I know my ww2 guns, that's a thompson.
Socrates271 1 year ago
@Lucidius134
It`s Thompson M1928A1 or M1921
TheNaturat 1 year ago
@Lucidius134 It's a Thompson. During WW2 as part of Lend Lease, American tanks were sent to the USSR came equipped with Thompson SMGs as part of the normal support gear for the tank crew. Well, problem is, the USSR didn't use .45 ACP, so the Thompson SMGs were utterly useless due to a lack of ammunition and wound up being packed away as direct surplus. I imagine the one used in this film was one of those Lend Lease SMGs.
deussolinvictus 1 year ago
@Lucidius134 it is
ghost9431 1 year ago
@Lucidius134 naw thats an m1928 thompson you can tell by its open bolt on top of the gun you got it right
waddupnoob 11 months ago
@Lucidius134 yes, is a tommy gun
Boldark 10 months ago
Comment removed
kellnola 10 months ago
@kellnola no, is a tommy gun
Boldark 10 months ago
This might just be the best movie ever. I was blown away the first time I saw it.
mrErikLundgren 1 year ago
Composer Artemyev made incredable music
AlexeiBuldakov 1 year ago
this is the most beautiful thing i´ve ever seen in my life
PIKlynch 1 year ago 2
greatest movie ever made!! this is pure art !!! this is art!!! i saw it 5 or 6 times,and i still want to watch it over and over again,because i always find out new things in this movie.
Nekronn 1 year ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
im so addicted to this game lol, best part about it is i got it FREE at
TownFinds . com
TubeTweaks 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
im so addicted to this game lol, best part about it is i got it FREE at
TownFinds . com
TubeTweaks 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This game is just wow! lol, im pretty much addicted i think, what tops the game is i got it for free at
TownFinds . com
TubeTweaks 1 year ago
I can't even imagine how much work went into getting these shots so perfect, if you watch closely right at the end there, the camera was moving downwards, tilting upwards and zooming out all at the same time :P
ShiftyMcSly 1 year ago
i once watched a russian film it was kind of like stalker all i remember is these guys walking around a forest with a geiger counter and then they went down a hole. There was a girl who was sick and needed massages or something. I think her dad was looking for a cure for her. It was really eery film if anyone knows whats its called please let me know :)
supagog 2 years ago
I was going through the special features on the DVD and everyone is dead! I'm not kidding, actor for the Stalker died in very early 60's of heart attack, actor for Writter died at age 47 of cancer, actor for Prof. was in his late 70's anyway and director in his mid 50's. And all but two crew members are still alive. In fact a sound tech that is still working today is positive that they were poisened when they shot the area at the plant. O_o
ShadowoOfBlood 2 years ago
Chernobyl was in 1986 this film is from 71 so there is no way this could be about the chenobyl-disaster. I know, there where thinks like that before ( e.g. the Kyshtym disaster in Majak in 1957 which was top secret until the end of the cold war).
I read a book from tarkovskji and he said, he don't wants to answer these questions, because this questions are intended to be like they are. He might had answers in mind - but it wouldn't be him if he would tell them. Think about them for yourself
Windkind0 2 years ago
this film is from 1979, Windkind0
FuckWorkdays 2 years ago
Doesn't matter, that's still way before Chernobyl
ACENLJ 1 year ago
Get out of here stalker.
MrBoBoTom 2 years ago 22
Comment removed
SupaKillah666 2 years ago
This movie was made in 1973. It's not about the Chernobyl disaster. Tarkovsky made it as a symbolic film for a man who leads people to God. In this particular excerpt the book for Revelation in which your number in your name is from is recited from. John 3:16.
Gotteskrieger07 2 years ago 11
Comment removed
SupaKillah666 2 years ago
In case you felt offended, I meant none. I thought you might have found it interesting that the movie quoted from the same book the numbers were from is all. =] Have a happy new year.
Gotteskrieger07 2 years ago
You're saying, numbers are numbers - but what is "numbers". "numbers" is a word which has a certain meaning. A simple numer like 7 oder 5 is a symbol and symbols are connected with meanings (otherwise you wouldn't know what to do with that symbol). If you read a 100 on a street-sign you'll know "oh I shouldn't drive more than 100 here" if you read it on a banknote you think "woah thats enaugh money for..."
But what you're never thinking is: "its just a number"
Symbol in context. That's it.
Windkind0 2 years ago
but as far as i know the end of the movie was filmed in front or close to the powerplant. unfortunately i havent seen the movie yet.
BrickBeige 2 years ago
i hope you are not talking about reactor 4...
this movie was made BEFORE the Chernobyl disaster
raulprima 1 year ago 8
According to Wikipedia the film was mainly shot somewhere around Tallin, so my info about Chernobyl was probably wrong.
BrickBeige 1 year ago
@raulprima also the director of this film died 1986 year of disaster, some say he was killed by KGB...??WTF??
I want to hear his thoughts on the disaster considering his movie was a premonition of it happening.
14ALL41OK 1 year ago
it came out 1979, Gotteskrieger07
FuckWorkdays 2 years ago
@Gotteskrieger07 Its not a good idea to read too much into Tarkovsky's films. Ie 'this image is symbolic of this...' etc. He intended his films to just be appreciated for what they are. People find whatever they want in them. He said once he didn't know what the images in his films mean.
Vandertop 1 year ago
@Gotteskrieger07 its been widely documented that the religious references depict a preoccupation only. tarkovsky has always said that the symbolism is flat, the objects are to be understood as objects, things of materiality and texture which hold age. he has described any direct metaphorical abstraction as crude. for me the film documents the complexity of the human condition rather than the pursuit of the afterlife. the greatness of a film like this is of course the broad interpretation
shalashaskalives 1 year ago
@Gotteskrieger07 The is no symbolism in this film, there is no true interpration of this film, only opinions imformed by personal experience of the veiwer.
almanacofsleep 1 year ago
@Gotteskrieger07 the stalker doesnt lead people to god but to the zone where all desires will come true. its based on a short story (called roadside picnic) where an alien race comes from another planet and mysteriously set up a zone to fullfill all our desires. my reading of this revolves around the question of what if a highly evolved aliens visited the earth who were so advanced that in relation to us they vertually would be gods in our eyes.
bradshawvincent 1 year ago 4
@Gotteskrieger07 fiction novel "Roadside Picnic" by Arkadii i Boris Strugatskie
bolotofloto 1 year ago
Comment removed
ShadowoOfBlood 2 years ago
This is russian language
MarselZiyazov 2 years ago
srry but what language is this? Just curious.
lilium202 2 years ago
Russian.
Revelation 6:12-13
Saavik256 2 years ago
i saw this movie for the first time yesterday.
It wasn´t slow for me at all, actually i didn´t wanted to end.
I just saw it again. Simply a masterpiece.
demonoide 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i dont understand why is this movie so awesome there is nothing srry i havent saw that film
MsKevin400 2 years ago
I remember seeing the Stalker for the first time. This was my intorduction ot Tarkovsky, a revelation in the sacred sense. During a longtime I flet there were only three authors in cinema : him, Bergman, and Antonioni. Of course I was wrong !
RADIOKLOW 2 years ago 3
Stalker was a fucking AMAZING film. Like Countevil said, the long lasGET OUT OF HERE STALKER
FSGrapecataz 2 years ago 4
"Come in, don't just stand there" and movie is good, vodka is fine, book is better HIGH-FIVE!
ViolentViolin 2 years ago
And yet,you must love them.This is the meaning of life,said the great Dostoievski....
Nekronn 2 years ago
Its really atmospheric to watch this part even on youtube... And still the most joy this film brings me in a dark,silent room where you are almost like in open space, and on my big screen there is this everliving masterpiece slowly moving frame after frame, sound by sound into the deep world of imagination where you create your only unique meaning of this film. This is what i call the joy of life, the joy of moment... Thank you Andrey Tarkovsky.
AbsoluteBrutality 2 years ago 4
I always thought that this scene represented the "dirt" of humanity.A syringe,a gun,ambigous metallic shards,picture of a political figure etc.Tarkovsky is the the best director of all time though if i had to pick the best movie,i can't decide between Stalker or Zerkalo.
ThoughtShard 2 years ago 3
what is the movie Zerkalo about?
raulprima 1 year ago
simply put, It is about Tarkovsky's mother
cyrusmir 1 year ago
This is a brilliant film. It definately requires patience. It's worth watching it to the end. It may be slow, but thats part of what makes it work. I love the long lasting shots. They're so impressive.
countevil 2 years ago 2
Ma favourite movie ! A masterpiece :)
Benoit1911 2 years ago 5
Yes, forget that hollywood shit and watch the real masterpieces like stalker.
repe112 2 years ago 69
@repe112 hollywood has some nice films too but those effects just cant make the films deeper and dont forget it hollywood has learnt much from tarkovsky and russian cinema, of course stalker is still beats any hollywood film with its atmosphere but I guess isnt just for anyone
ClaudeFrollon 1 year ago
@repe112
Preech bruther !!! That's what we call seventh art !!!
and fuck Transformers, Twilight, Iron man and all those hollywoodian shit!!!!
Manzeron 1 year ago
yes it is an artistic film so if you have strong ADD and have seen to many hollywood B movies , you might not have the patience required to appreciate this masterpiece.
sebastiantsiwt 2 years ago 3
any1 mind telling me what the meaning is behind all that i relly like it.
lordsamoth 2 years ago
If you have to ask what the meaning is you're missing the point. Tarkovsky's whole theory of film is that you should create your own symbolic associations, not allow them to be prescribed
BrokenGlassHandjob 2 years ago
u should configure ur own :)
posholvglush 2 years ago
ew 5.1 mix. USE THE ORIGINAL RUSSIAN MONO!
jpastuch 2 years ago
well i'll check it out, looks interesting.
aaman4567 2 years ago
is the movie any good? and is it anything like the game?
aaman4567 2 years ago
Yes... and no, the game only borrows little bits and pieces from this film and the book Roadside Picnic.
WeHaveExplosive 2 years ago
I say see it, it was really deap for me. The game takes things from this movie and the book roadside picknic. The book is a good read too :)
bob333336 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't recommend it. It's an art film... I guess I just don't get these things.
I can recommend the book, though; "Roadside picnic".
CommunistHamster 2 years ago
no. the game is nothing like the movie. there is nothing like this movie.
zagyex 2 years ago 2
art before profit
Muszynianka2 2 years ago 4
FISHES!!!!
Artas1984 2 years ago
I'm agree. This is one of the best sequences in cinema. The music is great!!
hermanitostandil 2 years ago 7
does anybody know if the syringe has any metaphoric meaning?
dirtysouthblues 2 years ago